2013 REPLACEMENT RESERVE STUDY - Fairlington · i. Roofing systems and associated flashings -...

2013 REPLACEMENT RESERVE STUDY

FAIRLINGTON GLEN CONDOMINIUMArlington, VA

February 27, 2014(2 Revision)nd

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Purpose. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Authority. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Background and Historical Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Management. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Scope of Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Forward-Looking and Updatable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5General Reserve Fund Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

OBSERVATIONS AND FINDINGS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8HARDSCAPE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

ASPHALT PAVEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8CONCRETE SIDEWALK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

UTILITIES.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11SANITARY SEWER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11STORM DRAINAGE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

MISCELLANEOUS SITE FEATURES.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18SIGNAGE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18FENCING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19HANDRAILS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21EXTERIOR LIGHTING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

RECREATIONAL FEATURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23SWIMMING POOL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23COURTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25TOT LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

BUILDING EXTERIORS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27SLATE ROOFING SYSTEMS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27FACADE.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

BUILDING INTERIORS & SERVICES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32INTERIORS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32TOOLS/EQUIPMENT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

Appendix A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

Appendix B. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

Appendix C. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

INTRODUCTION

Purpose: The purpose of this Capital Reserve Study is to provide the Board of Directors for the

Fairlington Glen Condominium Association with a document that establishes the replacement reserve

funding required to repair or replace physical assets when they reach the end of their useful service

lives. The replacement schedules are based on estimated useful life as determined by normal aging

schedules and a visual inspection of the existing conditions. This study, however, does not include a

detailed condition assessment of each item.

It is critical to the success of a condominium association to have an adequately funded replacement

reserve fund to provide for the replacement of the community’s common elements as they reach the

end of their useful lives. This Capital Reserve Study will help Fairlington Glen to determine the extent

and timing of the future gross reserve contributions that will be required to finance major replacements

and repairs as they become due. It will then be up to the Glen to provide for (1) the necessary funding

of its required reserve contributions and (2) a preventive maintenance program that will minimize any

reduction in the useful lives estimated in this study.

In developing this Capital Reserve Study, Restoration Engineering, Incorporated (REI) observed and

documented the condition of the property at random locations and noted its associated elements or

systems, and determined if the systems are functioning adequately and approximated when

replacement is required. By having a general idea of the useful life of commonly owned items within

the community, the Association can ensure that the monthly assessments are adequate to cover the

repair/replacement costs expected during any particular year. The property value of these

condominiums will be protected through the use of this study by providing ample funding for the

upkeep of these buildings.

Authority: This Type I Capital Reserve Study has been prepared in accordance with our proposal

dated September 11, 2012. Field work and gathering of information was performed between March

and May of 2013.

2

Background and Historical Information: Fairlington Glen Condominium is located near the

intersection of North Quaker Lane and King Street in Arlington. Fairlington Glen is comprised of 56

separate buildings each consisting of as little as 3 and as many as 11 individual townhome or

condominium style units.

Management: Presently, the Condominium is managed by Cardinal Management in Woodbridge,

Virginia. The Condominium Association is responsible for common elements used by all owners

(walkways, signage, sidewalks, etc.) as well as elements necessary to the function of the buildings

(i.e., sewer systems, roofing systems, parking lots, etc.).

Scope of Services: REI performed the following services in preparation of this study:

1. Reviewed construction drawings and details concerning numerous previous projects specified

by Restoration Engineering, Inc..

2. Reviewed available contracts and receipts for repair and replacement work on the buildings in

the last several years.

3. Reviewed and modified the Reserve Spreadsheet/Asset Schedule of the Association’s physical

assets that was previously prepared, in house, for the Glen’s 2008 Reserve Study by Mr.

William Worsley . This spreadsheet/schedule was modified based on site observations,

information collected and submitted by various Glen Board representatives and owners at

large, and from conversations with contractors who have worked on the buildings or are

familiar with construction conditions in the broader Fairlingon area of Arlington County.

4. Visually inspected, photographed and estimated the remaining service life of the following

common elements:

a. Hardscape including asphalt pavement, concrete curb and gutter and concrete

sidewalks.

b. Utilities including:

i. Sanitary Sewer System including existing cast iron and terra cotta sewers

including relining maintenance, cleanout installation, etc.

ii. Storm Sewer System including existing terra cotta, PVC, Orangeburg, concrete

and polyethylene piping systems and associated concrete and polyethylene

catch basins.

3

c. Miscellaneous Site Features including signage, fencing (multiple types), handrails and

exterior lighting.

d. Recreational Features including:

i. Swimming Pool and associated equipment and accessories

ii. Pool Deck and Coping

iii. Tennis Courts

iv. Paddleball Court

v. Basketball Court

vi. Tot Lot Equipment

e. Exterior Building Elements including:

i. Roofing systems and associated flashings - including gutters and downspouts

and chimney caps.

ii. Brick masonry stoops at entryways.

iii. Building facade including brick and stone masonry veneers and associated

architectural elements. While the architectural wood trim found throughout the

property is a common element, it is considered an ongoing maintenance item;

therefore, a certain percentage of the yearly budget is devoted to maintenance

of these elements and, thus, reserves are not generally used for repair or

replacement of these items.

iv. Common Area Doors and Windows at Apartment Style units.

f. Building Interiors and Services including:

i. General Common Elements at Common Interiors of Apartment Style units

including interior Finishes (Carpeting, Trim, etc.), Mailboxes and Interior

Lighting.

ii. Tools and Equipment utilized by on site maintenance personnel.

Please note that a comprehensive inspection of all elements was not performed. Only a small

percentage of an item are actually inspected/reviewed to approximate the existing conditions and

estimated quantities. We did not inspect every sealant joint, roof, gutter, metal flashing, etc.

5. Estimated the repair or replacement costs using the following sources:

4

a. Contractors’ bids/costs for similar repair/replacement work on other projects.

b. Previous amounts paid for renovation work done on this property.

c. Published cost data such as Means Construction Cost Data.

d. Industry publications such as trade journals and news bulletins that discuss

construction costs.

Note that the cost projections assume that regular maintenance and repairs will be performed in

accordance with accepted industry standards. The service lives of building components are reduced if

proper maintenance and repair schedules are not followed.

6. REI excluded the following services or items from the survey:

a. Items that are the responsibility of the Unit Owners including:

i. Windows (with the exception of windows at common areas and pool house)

ii. Doors (with the exception of building entry door at apartment style units and

doors at Pool House/Restroom Facility)

b. Items maintained by funds in the maintenance and operations budget, including but

not limited to exterior wood trim and fascia.

c. A code analysis to determine if items are in compliance with current local and State

building codes, including accessibility issues.

d. Projects to upgrade the existing facilities as required to comply with current or new

building codes or to upgrade to improve a specific system.

e. Identification or testing for any type of hazardous material.

f. Demolition or destructive testing to determine actual conditions.

g. Evaluation of mechanical and electrical items by specialized consultants to better

assess the mechanical and electrical systems.

7. REI also included a line item for the reserve study itself, with a useful life of 5 years (the

statutory interval between reserve studies) because the Glen has chosen to save for such

studies and to fund them from reserves.

Forward-Looking and Updatable: We were asked to make this study, as much as possible, a

forward-looking analysis of the actual condition of the property. To further this goal, no asset that was

5

fully functioning was listed as fully depreciated (with annual depreciation = 0), even though it might

have exceeded the average useful lifespan reported in trade studies for such assets, unless the Glen

was in the process of contracting for its replacement. In other words, when an aging Glen asset was

still fully functioning, we did our best to estimate how much longer was it likely to last, given its age

and the fact that it had already lasted so long. In making this determination, we relied on a wide

variety of information, including trade studies of depreciation, conversations with contractors, and

experience with similar assets in the much broader Fairlington area that includes the Glen.

As with the Glen's 2008 reserve study, this study was designed to provide an easily updatable model

as well as a report on the condition of the Glen's assets. Asset replacement costs can be easily

updated by using spreadsheet formulas to update inflation factors and replacement costs/unit (for

example, by updating older roof replacement costs/square foot with those reflected in recent

contracts).

General Reserve Fund Information: We did not perform a cash flow analysis, as might typically be

done in a capital reserve study, because the Condominium will do this in house based upon the

required reserve expenditure projections provided by this study. Thus, projections of revenues,

operating expenses, gross reserve contributions, and the extent to which reserves will be fully funded

(reserves = accrued depreciation) were beyond the scope of this study. REI will continue to work

with the Glen’s in house accounting to revise the reserve funding figures once a funding plan is

approved and established by the Board.

Appendix A of this Study is the Asset Schedule for all Common Elements. As noted in Appendix A, the

Estimated Annual Depreciation Cost for Fairlington Glen’s assets is around $300,000.00.

SubAppendices A1, A2, etc. include specific data for some general items listed in the Asset Schedule.

Appendix B, Multi-Year Reserve Expenditures Table, shows the expected Reserve expenditures over

the next 20 years. All appendices are incorporated into a single spreadsheet which is derived from the

Glen’s 2008 Reserve spreadsheet, prepared by Mr. Bill Worsley. It is important to understand that

these tables/appendices show a best estimate of repair/replacement requirements. The true cost can

only be determined by obtaining bids based on a specific scope of work from several Contractors.

Also, the tables do not dictate that replacement must occur in a given year.

6

This study reflects current building conditions and possible expenses for the Association, but the study

is not a substitute for proper management of and maintenance of the community’s common property.

Usually, items are not replaced in the specific year that they are scheduled for replacement in the

study. Since some aesthetic items do not jeopardize the integrity of the building systems, their

replacement timing and value will vary depending on the desires of the Association. In addition, some

items will not survive their expected life spans and will require early replacement. Likewise, other

items will exceed their expected life span and allow replacement to be delayed. Costs will vary as well

and all estimates are based on conditions prevailing and observed at the time this report was

prepared.

Capital Reserve Studies are required under the Virginia Condominium Act every five years. In addition,

the Board is to review the results of the study at least annually to determine if reserves are sufficient

and make any adjustments to maintain reserves. The Glen has been following and should continue to

follow these practices.

7

OBSERVATIONS AND FINDINGS

General: The information provided in the following sections is grouped in accordance with the

Reserve Schedule so that similar or related building systems and components are together. Each

section is further broken down into numbered component parts which describe specific elements. The

condition of each component is then determined and either the repair or replacement work

recommended is identified. We also provide more detailed explanations of items where we found

unusual conditions or where we made basic assumptions based on our knowledge of building

systems. Each component number corresponds to a line item on the expenditure charts.

The information in the following sections discusses each building component, its condition, and

recommendations for either repair or replacement. Each number has a corresponding line item in the

Table at Appendix B that provides the estimated remaining useful life of each item and the estimated

cost for replacement.

1. HARDSCAPE

1.1 ASPHALT PAVEMENT

1.1.1 General: All Courts are paved with asphalt. Based on test cut data from our 2006

Pavement Study, the original profile of the pavement probably consisted of a 2 to 2 ½ inch

base course and a 1 to 1 ½ inch surface course. Over the years, multiple asphalt overlays

have been installed, raising the profile of the pavement throughout the community and

covering the original concrete curb at almost all locations.

1.1.2 Condition: The existing asphalt pavement is generally in fair condition, as documented

in our 2013 Pavement Survey. Two courts that were previously (in 2006) listed to be in Poor

condition have subsequently been overlaid and all Courts have been frequently sealcoated.

8

1.1.3 Life Expectancy: Despite the rigorous maintenance, we anticipate that full replacement

of the pavement will be necessary around 2023 with the exception of Court 9. The pavement

should be reevaluated, at that time, prior to proceeding with full scale replacement work. For

the purposes of this Study, the life expectancy of all Courts (except 9) has been set at 10

years.

1.1.4 Replacement Considerations: As noted in the Pavement Survey, when the pavement is

replaced the associated concrete curb and gutter should also be replaced and reconfigured as

necessary. In addition, compliance with Arlington County regulations governing water runoff

to the Chesapeake Bay may limit the Glen's ability to replace its parking lots completely down

to the subgrade (exposed earth) without either losing allowable surface area, using alternate

surface materials (such as a more expensive permeable surface) or constructing addititional

drainage structures elements (filtration berms, sediment traps, etc.). Consequently,

replacement of all Courts has been lumped together (in 2023) to mitigate some of these

additional costs and to achieve an economy of scale.

1.1.5 Cost Information: Unit Cost information for both replacement and ongoing asphalt

maintenance were derived from previously performed work by Dominion Paving and

conversations with asphalt paving contractors.

1.2 CONCRETE SIDEWALK

1.2.1 General: All common sidewalks in the community are fabricated from poured in

place concrete. Sidewalks are typically 4 feet wide but dimensions vary significantly. In the

previous Study, a total of 42,655 square feet of concrete sidewalk was estimated based upon

information derived from the Arlington County Survey Map. Using a more detailed plat of the

property that we prepared for previous work at Fairlington Glen, we calculated a more accurate

measure of the existing concrete sidewalk area. Based on the takeoff from our electronic

drawings we estimated a total of 47,469 square feet of concrete sidewalk which is

significantly higher than the previously estimated total. The Reserve Schedule reflects this

revised amount.

9

1.2.2 Condition: Given that many sections of sidewalk have been replaced over the years,

the condition of the sidewalk varies significantly. Overall, the sidewalk is in fair condition and

continued maintenance with periodic, targeted replacement should be performed.

1.2.3 Life Expectancy: Service life can vary significantly based on proximity to tree roots,

subgrade conditions, location (i.e. in a common walkway), exposure, etc. For the purposes of

this Study the life expectancy has been slated as 20 years which is consistent with previous

studies.

1.2.4 Replacement Considerations: We recommend that the Glen continue with targeted

concrete sidewalk replacement (approximately 5 to 10 percent) every three years. In addition,

if the Glen elects to proceed with a comprehensive pavement replacement project in 2023, the

concrete sidewalk immediately adjacent to the pavement and at adjoining entrance walks will

likely need to be replaced.

1.2.5 Unit Cost Information: Unit cost for sidewalk replacement is estimated at $8.32 per

square foot and is based on conversations with concrete/pavement contractors.

1.3 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER

1.3.1 General: Poured in place concrete curb and gutter is installed along the perimeter of

all Courts; however, in most locations, the gutter pan has been overlaid with asphalt and is not

visible. As discussed in the pavement section above, multiple overlays have been installed at

most Courts and, as a result, only the curb is visible.

1.3.2 Condition: Where visible the curbs are in fair condition but cannot be maintained

without damaging the asphalt pavement.

1.3.3 Life Expectancy: The existing concrete curb and gutter is at the end of its useful life

and should be replaced.

10

1.3.4 Replacement Considerations: Given that replacement of the concrete curb and gutter

will have a significant impact on the adjoining asphalt pavement, we recommend that this

work be performed in conjunction with the asphalt pavement reconstruction in 2023.

2. UTILITIES

2.1 SANITARY SEWER

2.1.1 General: During the condominium conversion in the 1970's, bathrooms were installed

in all basement levels. At that time, the original cast iron plumbing below the floor slab was

removed and replaced with plastic piping (to the best of our knowledge). All sanitary sewer

piping converges below the basement slab in the “Low Unit” where the newer plastic piping is

connected to an original cast iron, 4 inch diameter lateral that runs to a point a few feet outside

the building wall. The lateral then typically transitions to a 6 inch diameter, terra cotta pipe

which extends either to a manhole that is serviced by an Arlington County lateral or connects

directly to the Arlington County Main in the street.

2.1.2 Terra Cotta Piping:

2.1.2.1 Condition: As documented in our 2006 Sanitary Sewer Survey and

subsequent repair work, the original terra cotta piping was in marginal

condition at the time of the survey; however, was still in functional condition

and could be repaired. Subsequently, over the three-year period 2007-2009,

35 of the 56 terra cotta sewer laterals were relined using an epoxy injection

method. The remaining 21 had either been previously relined or fully replaced,

or in a few cases, were replaced by Dwyer during the 2007-2009 period. The

relining work was performed by US Sewer and Drain. To our knowledge there

have been relatively few issues subsequent to completion of the relining work

and the Glen no longer incurs cost for maintenance of the exterior sanitary

11

sewer laterals. However, we are aware of ongoing litigation between US

Sewer & Drain and an adjacent Fairlington Community regarding problems that

occurred subsequent to their relining project. The status and settlement of this

case should be closely monitored to determine what, if any, impact it may

have on the Glen. Our understanding is that some of the principal concerns

center on the tie in between the cast iron and terra cotta laterals and the

termination of the epoxy liner at that point. For the purposes of this Study, it is

assumed that similar repair work will not be necessary at the Glen; however, it

may be advantageous to perform some camera inspections of a few of these

tie-ins at the Glen.

2.1.2.2 Life Expectancy: The life expectancy of relined terra cotta piping is generally

estimated at 50 years; however, the technology has not been tested over a

long enough period of time to determine if this estimate is conservative,

realistic or overly optimistic. For the purposes of this Study the life expectancy

is listed as 50 years. In approximately 20 years, the Glen should again

perform a comprehensive inspection to assess the condition of the relined

piping at its supposed half-life.

2.1.3 Exterior Cleanouts:

2.1.3.1 General: Over the years, several exterior cleanouts were installed to provide

access to the terra cotta laterals at a point just outside the building walls.

Installation of the cleanouts was necessitated by the need to perform frequent

maintenance to prevent clogging of the laterals. When the comprehensive

relining project was performed, numerous additional cleanouts were installed

(except in 14 lines where access was from existing manholes) to provide

permanent access to specific lines for the purpose of facilitating future

inspection and maintenance. The cleanouts typically consist of a vertical, 6

inch diameter PVC pipe that extends just above grade where it terminates at a

removable plug. The vertical pipe is typically connected to the lateral with a

“Y” fitting.

12

2.1.3.2 Life Expectancy: It is reasonable to assume that the exterior cleanouts will

last as long as the sewer laterals. Given that the cleanouts would probably

need to be replaced in conjunction with any major work on the sewer laterals,

we estimate the life expectancy to be 50 years.

2.1.4 PVC Piping:

2.1.4.1 General: As previously noted, when the Glen was converted to condominiums

most of the below grade piping beneath the units was replaced with Poly Vinyl

Chloride (PVC) pipe. In addition, where original terra cotta sewer laterals were

replaced over the years, they were generally replaced with new PVC pipe.

2.1.4.2 Condition: Only a small portion of the PVC pipe from the conversion era has

been surveyed and is in good condition. Most of he replaced sewer laterals

are relatively new and are also presumed to be in good to excellent condition.

2.1.4.3 Life Expectancy: Typically, the life expectancy of below grade PVC piping has

been estimated at 50 years. However, recent research/testing on PVC pipe

suggests that the life expectancy may be significantly higher than this figure;

even up to and beyond 100 years. For the purposes of this study the life

expectancy is estimated at 65 years.

2.1.5 Cast Iron Piping

2.1.5.1 General: As previously noted, the sewer laterals that extend from the “Low

Unit” to the exterior laterals are fabricated from cast iron pipe that is typically 4

inches in diameter. During the relining project a few of the interior cast iron

laterals were relined but the vast majority have not been addressed. There is

also one unit (3571-A2 S. Stafford Street) where the original cast iron laterals

had to be replaced at a considerable cost and inconvenience to both the

Homeowner and the Association. When this original line was replaced, new

PVC piping was installed in lieu of cast iron.

2.1.5.2 Condition: In the course of the 2006 Sanitary Sewer Survey we were able to

inspect a small portion of the cast iron laterals in instances where access to

the exterior lateral could only be gained via the basement bathroom or interior

13

cleanout. From this limited observance we noted numerous locations with

standing water and widespread buildup of scale on the interior surface of the

pipe. In many instances the camera head could not be pushed through the

interior of the pipe due to the buildup of scale/corrosion. The scale can be

cleaned via high pressure washing equipment (as was performed by US Sewer

and Drain in locations where they installed an outside cleanout); however, the

scale will continue to buildup over time and continue to reduce the cross

sectional area of the pipe.

2.1.5.3 Life Expectancy: Cast iron piping, when properly installed with adequate

slope and compacted bedding can provide service for 100 years or more.

However, when not properly installed or in cases where the subgrade has

deteriorated (possibly due to high ground water/flooding) the piping can begin

to sag or “belly” and hold water. Standing water in the piping accelerates

corrosion of the cast iron and, eventually, will lead to failure of the pipe.

Although conditions probably vary significantly (as highlighted above), we

estimate the average service life to be 75 years at the Glen. Given this figure,

the cast iron piping is nearing the end of its useful life and replacement/relining

costs should be budgeted.

2.1.5.4 Replacement Considerations: There are three options for addressing

repair/replacement of the cast iron sewer laterals:

2.1.5.4.1 The first option is to simply replace the pipe with new pipe.

Replacement of the piping is an extremely invasive and

disruptive process which requires partial demolition of the

basement floor slab. Although the Association is not

responsible for replacement of damaged personal items (non

common elements) this is still the most expensive option and

should be avoided if at all possible. Although not desired, the

Board should still allocate enough funding to account for

complete replacement in at least 10 percent of the cases.

2.1.5.4.2 The second option is to reline the interior of the cast iron piping

in a manner similar to the relining of the exterior laterals. This

14

is probably the most economical option provided that the pipe

is sound and straight enough to allow for cleaning of the pipe

scale and insertion of the relining equipment and the liner itself.

We estimate that this option will be employed in 60 percent of

the cases.

2.1.5.4.3 The third and final option is pipe bursting. This method

involves pulling a new plastic pipe through the old pipe. The

method is called “Bursting” because the leading edge of the

new pipe is mounted to a bursting head that splits open the old

pipe to make room for the new pipe. We have estimated that

his method will be employed in 30 percent of cases. Please

note that pipe bursting in this capacity has not actually been

performed at the Glen (as opposed to the other two methods)

so the viability and cost of this option is not as well defined.

Once a few pipes have been replaced in this manner, the

estimated cost for this work may need to be updated.

2.2 STORM DRAINAGE

2.2.1 General: For this Study we provided a detailed breakdown of all Stormwater

Management elements as shown on the “Storm” tab of the Asset Spreadsheet. These

elements have been broken down into piping and structure components.

2.2.2 Concrete Manholes/Catchbasins and Manhole Covers:

2.2.2.1 General: There are numerous catchbasins throughout the property that collect

stormwater runoff and divert runoff, via underground piping, into the Arlington

County stormwater mains running along the various streets surrounding the

Glen. The catchbasin covers are typically made from concrete while the

basins themselves are made of either concrete or concrete masonry. At grade

inlet locations (in parking lots), cast iron grates are installed while at other

15

locations, the basin is accessed via manholes that are typically covered with

cast iron manhole covers.

2.2.2.2 Condition/Life Expectancy: In general, the various catch basins are in good

condition and should provide numerous additional years of service. For the

purposes of this study the useful life of the basins is listed as 100 years but

this figure may be exceeded. When the parking lots are reconstructed, it may

be advisable/necessary to reconstruct some of the existing grade inlet catch

basins that are within the parking areas.

2.2.2.3 Maintenance: Ongoing maintenance of all catch basins must be periodically

performed to maintain proper operation of all catch basins. For example,

some of the yard inlet basins have been choked with vegetative overgrowth or

overzealous application of mulch which has impeded the drain inlet.

Maintenance costs for these situations are not considered as part of the

Reserve Study.

2.2.3 Orangeburg Pipe

2.2.3.1 General: There are only two sections of Orangeburg pipe remaining on the

property (small section from catch basin between Courts 2 and 3 and short

line running beneath the Tot Lot). All other sections have been replaced with

PVC piping (see below).

2.2.3.2 Condition/Life Expectancy: The condition of the existing piping is unknown;

however, no recent problems have been reported. It is likely that the piping is

nearing the end of its useful life and will likely require replacement within 4 to 6

years. When the pipe is replaced, new PVC piping should be installed.

2.2.4 Terra Cotta Pipe

2.2.4.1 General: Many of the larger diameter pipes interconnecting catch basins or

leading to the Arlington County Main are fabricated from terra cotta segments.

This is the same type of piping that is used for the sanitary sewer laterals (see

above) and which required relining in that instance. In the case of the storm

16

laterals, the piping is a much larger diameter and, as such, is not as

susceptible to blockages from root intrusion.

2.2.4.2 Condition: When the storm sewer survey was conducted in 2007, many of the

terra cotta storm laterals were surveyed and were generally found to be in

good condition.

2.2.4.3 Life Expectancy: For the purposes of this study, the life expectancy of the terra

cotta piping has been set at 100 years; however, the service life may extend

well beyond this amount of time.

2.2.4.4 Eventually, when the piping requires repair, the terra cotta lines should be

relined with an epoxy liner in a manner similar to the sanitary laterals. The unit

cost for relining of 12 inch diameter terra cotta piping is approximately $140

per lineal foot (based on conversations with US Sewer and Drain).

2.2.5 Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) Pipe

2.2.5.1 As previously noted, some of the original Orangeburg stormwater piping

throughout the Glen has subsequently been replaced with PVC piping. The

condition of the piping was not verified but was assumed to be in excellent

condition given the age of the material. The generally anticipated life

expectancy of PVC storm drainage pipe is around 65 years.

2.2.6 Polyethylene Pipe

2.2.6.1 Throughout the Glen, in some areas, perforated and corrugated polyethylene

piping (and catch basins – see below) was installed to facilitate surface

drainage. The piping is typically installed just below grade and typically

interconnects plastic catch basins or discharges into a natural drainage feature

or a concrete catch basin.

2.2.6.2 Condition/Life Expectancy: The condition of the piping varies depending upon

age and installation. In locations where the piping was not properly wrapped

with filter fabric and not properly sloped it is choked with sediment and is in

poor condition. The polyethylene material itself is robust (especially when not

exposed to UV light); however, the performance of this material over an

17

extended period of time is not anticipated. For the purpose of this Study the

life expectancy is assumed to be 20 years.

2.2.6.3 Replacement Cost: When sections of corrugated polyethylene piping are

replaced, we recommend that new perforated PVC sewer and drain pipe be

installed in a manner similar to the recent work performed in the common area

between Court 9 and Court 15 by Environmental Enhancements. The

approximate unit cost to install new PVC S&D piping just below grade is $25

per lineal foot.

2.2.7 Polyethylene Catch Basins and Grates:

2.2.7.1 As noted in the previous Section, numerous polyethylene catch basins have

been installed throughout the Glen. The catch basins are generally in good

condition and should provide 20+ years of service.

3. MISCELLANEOUS SITE FEATURES

3.1 SIGNAGE

3.1.1 General: Site signage is limited to the entrance signs at each of the sixteen Courts.

These signs are carved and painted wooden signs that are approximately 5 to 10 square feet.

3.1.2 Condition: The signs are in fair condition and will require maintenance throughout their

remaining useful lives.

3.1.3 Life Expectancy: The signs are anticipated to provide 9 additional years of service

provided maintenance and repair (primarily painting) are routinely performed.

18

3.1.4 Replacement Cost: Current replacement unit cost for a carved wooden sign with 2

colors is approximately $80 to $100 a square foot. Based on the size and number of signs we

estimate the current replacement cost to be around $11,750.00.

3.2 FENCING

3.2.1 General: A “Fencing” tab has been added to the Asset Schedule/Spreadsheet to

provide detailed information regarding the quantity, life expectancy and anticipated

replacement cost of the various types of fencing utilized at the Glen.

3.2.2 Patio Fencing: Privacy fencing (approximately 6 feet high) is installed around all private

patio areas in the rear of the units. The pressure treated wood fencing is fabricated with

pressure treated 4 by 4 and 6 by 6 posts and is clad with 1x dimensional treated lumber on

one side.

3.2.2.1 We calculated the length of patio fencing to be approximately 13,250 lineal feet

based on the site plan that we previously prepared in AutoCad. Based on this

quantity we estimate the 2013 replacement cost to be approximately

$400,000 based upon conversations with various fencing contractors. The

patio fencing was last replaced in 1997 at a cost of approximately $250,000.

3.2.2.2 Condition/Life Expectancy: Although the patio fencing is 15+ years old it is

still, generally, in good condition. The life expectancy of the patio fencing had

been previously indicated as 20 years in the previous two studies; however,

given the condition, we believe the life expectancy can be extended another 3

to 5 years provided routine maintenance is performed.

3.2.3 Split Rail Fencing: The vinyl split rail fence installed along the sidewalk that abuts the

parking lot in Court 4 was installed in 2010 and is in excellent condition. We anticipate an

additional 27 years of service and maintenance costs should be minimal.

3.2.4 Perimeter Fencing: The border of the property that adjoins King Street and Quaker

Lane is protected by a 6 foot high chain link fence. The fence along Quaker Lane was installed

19

in 1977 and the short section of fencing between 36 Street and King Street (along Quakerth

Lane) was reportedly installed some time later. The installation date for the fencing along King

Street is not known and may date to the condominium conversion.

3.2.4.1 We estimated the length of perimeter fencing from field observations and a

takeoff from available CAD drawings resulting in a total estimated length of

2200 feet. The estimated unit cost for replacement, in $2013, is

approximately $30.00 per lineal foot yielding an anticipated replacement cost

of $66,000.00. Replacement costs assume in-kind replacement and costs

could be significantly higher if the Board elects to install an aluminum or

wooden fence in lieu of chain link when replacement is performed.

3.2.4.2 Condition/Life Expectancy: The perimeter fencing is overgrown with vegetation

in numerous locations which hinders assessment. Given the ages of the fence

sections we believe the perimeter fencing is nearing the end of its useful life

and should be replaced in approximately 2 to 3 years; however, prior to

proceeding with full scale replacement it would be advantageous to review the

existing condition with several fencing contractors to determine if certain

sections of the fencing may be salvaged if conditions vary significantly.

3.2.5 Pool Perimeter Fencing: A 6 foot high decorative aluminum fence is installed along the

perimeter of the pool deck and a shorter section of aluminum fencing is installed between the

baby pool and the main pool.

3.2.5.1 The aluminum fencing was replaced in 2003 at a cost of $32,200 or roughly

$80 a lineal foot. We estimate the 2013 replacement cost to be equivalent

with the 2003 cost.

3.2.5.2 Condition/Life Expectancy: The aluminum fencing has a lifespan of

approximately 30 years as estimated on the previous study. The fencing is still

in excellent condition and should provide 20 years of additional service as

planned.

20

3.2.6 Court Fencing: 10 foot high chain link fencing is installed around all of the tennis

courts and the paddle ball court. There is a short (3 foot) section of chain link fencing along

the north side of the basketball court.

3.2.6.1 We calculated the length of 10 foot high fencing to be approximately 1070

lineal feet and the length of 3 foot high fencing to be approximately 80 lineal

feet. The triple tennis court fence on the north side of Court 1 was replaced in

2011 at a cost of approximately $21,000 or roughly $40 a lineal foot. Based

on this figure we estimate the 2013 replacement cost for all fencing to be

approximately $43,000.

3.2.6.2 As noted, the triple tennis court fence and basketball court fence are new and

are in excellent condition. The single tennis court fence was installed in 2003,

is in fair condition and should provide another 10 to 12 years of service. The

paddle ball fence is in marginal condition and should be replaced in the next 3

to 5 years.

3.3 HANDRAILS

3.3.1 General: Throughout the property, in areas where there are more than 2 or 3 concrete

steps in succession, wrought iron handrails have been installed to prevent falls and to assist

pedestrians when climbing or descending the stairs. This item was not included on previous

studies but has been included with this study because it is a common element.

3.3.1.1 We counted a total of 40 handrail sections during our survey of the property.

The length of each section varies considerably but the actual lineal footage

was not calculated. We anticipate the replacement cost, in $2013, to be

approximately $225.00 per section or $9,000.00

3.3.1.2 Condition/Life Expectancy: In general the handrails are in fair condition

although there are a number of areas where the handrail posts are slightly

loose and are not anchored properly. Loose handrails could be a liability issue

so on site maintenance personnel should be vigilant with maintenance and

repair. We anticipate that the handrails will provide 15 years of additional

service.

21

3.4 EXTERIOR LIGHTING

3.4.1 Carriage Lights: Throughout the community, there are a number of “Carriage” lights

that are mounted to poles approximately 20 to 30 feet from the main entrances to individual

units. The carriage lights are connected via circuitry that runs to a common electrical panel.

In general, one circuit is provided per Court. Replacement of the circuitry that feeds the

carriage lights is considerably more expensive than the carriage lights themselves and the life

expectancies, following replacement, are different as well; therefore, for the purposes of this

study, the Carriage Lights and the circuitry that supports the carriage lights (see below) have

been separated into separate line items.

3.4.1.1 During our field survey we counted 186 total poles and carriage lights. The

estimated cost to replace the lights and poles is $250 per pole/light which

yields a total estimated replacement cost of $46,500.00. This cost could vary

substantially given that the cost of lighting fixtures varies tremendously

depending upon style and materials. Also note that the poles do not

necessarily need to be replaced when the carriage lights are replaced which

could yield additional unit cost savings.

3.4.1.2 Condition/Life Expectancy: The condition of the carriage lights varies

somewhat due to varying exposure conditions; however, in general, the lights

are in fair condition. We estimate that the lights will provide an additional 5 to

7 years of service. When the lights are replaced, the circuitry should also be

replaced (see below).

3.4.2 Carriage Light Circuits: As noted above, the carriage lights are connected to a

common lighting circuit at each Court. This circuit for the exterior lights is typically a buried

electrical cable that is, presumably, exterior rated. Based on conversations with electricians

who have performed worked at Fairlington Glen and other Fairlington properties, this circuitry

is not reliable and is not installed in accordance with current Code requirements. We strongly

recommend that the existing circuitry be replaced in conjunction with replacement of the lights

themselves. When the circuitry is replaced there are two options: 1) New, exterior rated,

22

insulated conductor (not in conduit) can be installed; however, this conductor must be buried

a minimum of 24 inches below grade level which will require substantial excavation

throughout the property; or 2) New, exterior rated, rigid metal conduit can be installed at a

minimum depth of 6 inches below grade. Clearly, option 2 is more economically viable and

less invasive to the property.

3.4.2.1 Based on conversations with electricians who have performed similar

replacement work at other Fairlington properties, we estimated the total length

of circuitry for the carriage lights to be around 8,500 lineal feet. The

approximate unit cost to install new conductor in rigid metal conduit is $12.00

a lineal foot yielding a total estimated replacement cost of around

$100,000.00.

3.4.3 Swimming Pool Pole Lights: There are 13 pole lights surrounding the swimming pool

that were presumably installed around the time of the conversion. These lights are generally in

good condition and should provide an additional 15 years of service. The estimated unit

replacement cost, in 2013 dollars, is 500 dollars per light; however, this cost could vary

significantly depending upon the material and style selected.

4. RECREATIONAL FEATURES

4.1 SWIMMING POOL

4.1.1 General: The existing swimming pool was constructed, reportedly, in 1974 and is a

standard, in ground, concrete swimming pool with a plaster “whitecoat”, tile borders and

precast concrete coping stones.

4.1.2 Whitecoating: Replastering or “Whitecoating” of the pools was performed in 2009 at a

cost of $21,782.00. The anticipated life expectancy of the whitecoat is approximately 10

years; therefore, reapplication of the “whitecoat” is anticipated in 2019. Based on

conversations with commercial swimming pool contractors, current pricing for whitecoating is

23

around $6.50 per square foot which calculates to a total 2013 cost of approximately

$25,500.00

4.1.3 Coping Stones and Perimeter Tile: The existing precast concrete coping stones and

decorative ceramic tile (at the water line) along the perimeter of the main pool and wading pool

are in fair condition and are estimated to have a remaining useful life of approximately 6 to 8

years; however, it is likely more cost effective to coordinate this work with the next whitecoat

application. Therefore, the anticipated replacement date is slated for 2019. The estimated unit

replacement cost of the coping stones, in 2013 dollars, is $75.00 per lineal foot yielding a

total anticipated replacement cost of around $25,000.00

4.1.4 Pool Deck:

4.1.4.1 Maintenance: The existing concrete pool deck surrounding the swimming

pools is in fair condition but continued maintenance will be necessary until the

deck is replaced due to isolated spalling and cracking that typically occur. The

Association has, to date, allocated funding for isolated concrete repairs on the

pool deck every five years with the next round of repairs anticipated to occur

next year (2014). We recommend performing repairs in 2014 and every fifth

year subsequently. It is estimated that 7.5 percent of the pool deck will require

repair at a unit cost of $32.00 per square foot when repairs are performed.

4.1.4.2 Deck Replacement: The life expectancy of the pool deck is approximately 16

years with replacement currently anticipated in 2029. The anticipated unit cost

for replacement (in $2013) is $14.50 per square foot yielding a total

anticipated construction cost of around 100 thousand dollars. The figures

referenced are based on conversations with various paving contractors.

4.1.5 Pool Reconstruction: The previous Study included an allocation of $500,000 for “Pool

Reconstruction” based on information garnered from a Reserve Study for an adjacent

Fairlington property and confirmed by the association’s pool contractor. Presumably,

“reconstruction” would entail complete removal and replacement of the existing pool shell and

associated piping. Based on conversations with various pool contractors, it is uncertain if

24

complete reconstruction of the pool will be required in the next 20 to 30 years as previously

allocated. Apparently, swimming pools constructed in the 1970's (such as FG) are often

superior in construction to those that were fabricated in the 1980's and even into the early

1990's due to changes in gunite/shotcrete materials and application methods. For this reason,

the swimming pool may not need complete reconstruction and periodic structural repair and

piping maintenance/replacement can be performed instead. For the purposes of this Study the

life expectancy is listed as 60 years but the funding has been reduced from $500,000 to

$250,000.

4.1.6 Pool Covers: Our understanding is that, currently, Fairlington Glen does not use a

pool cover. For the purposes of this Study and based on allocation in the previous Study,

funding is allocated for a pool cover in approximately 6 years at an estimated cost of $3.25

per square foot or around $11,000 (in $2013).

4.1.7 Pool Pumps/Filters/Drains: The existing pool pumps, filters and drains were installed in

2009 and are in good condition. The estimated life expectancy of the pool equipment is

around 10 years; therefore, replacement is anticipated again in 2019. Estimated Replacement

Costs are based on the 2009 pricing adjusted for inflation.

4.2 COURTS

4.2.1 Tennis Courts: The triple tennis court adjacent to Court 1 was reconstructed and

resurfaced in 2011 at a cost of $97,366.00 by Bishops Tennis, Inc. When the triple tennis

court was resurfaced, a new, specialized, waterproof fiber turf (“Nova Pro-Bounce” by General

Acrylics) was installed. The General Acrylics website describes the turf as follows “... The

Nova'Pro-Bounce consists of an all-weather densely fibered turf with a waterproof backing.

This turf is also laid out in large rolls and seamed together to form a single manufactured

composite that is fastened only at the court edges. The turf fibers are filled with silica sand

and then saturated with a liquid resin that cures and locks together the sand and fibers to form

a cushioned layer. The resin-filled turf is then toped with a standard, flexible liquid-applied

acrylic surface system...” The single tennis court adjacent to the Swimming Pool was

25

overlaid with asphalt in 2011 (also by Bishop Tennis) and coated (conventional coating - not

turf) at a cost of $41,655.00. The surface of the single tennis court was previously recoated

(prior to reconstruction work in 2011) in 2006, at a cost of $12,620.00.

4.2.1.1 Condition: The triple tennis court is practically brand new and is in excellent

condition while the single tennis court coating is also in good condition.

4.2.1.2 Life Expectancy/Maintenance: The life expectancy of the coatings on both the

triple tennis court and the single tennis court is approximately five years;

therefore, recoating is anticipated in 2016. The asphalt overlay should provide

15 years of service at the single tennis court while the life expectancy of the

new fabric surfacing at the triple tennis court should provide 20 years of

service.

4.2.1.3 Replacement Cost: Recoating cost information was obtained directly from Skip

Bishop. The estimated recoating cost for the single tennis court is $10,000.00

This cost also includes an allocation for miscellaneous leveling and crack

repair. The estimated recoating cost for the triple tennis court is $20,000.00.

Reconstruction costs are based on the original construction costs adjusted for

inflation.

4.2.2 Basketball Court: The basketball court was recently reconstructed and recoated by

Pro-Pave Inc. at a cost of approximately $17,000 and $4,000 respectively. The basketball

court has a history of foundation problems which have resulted in numerous repairs over the

years; however, the recent repairs involved complete reconstruction and compaction of the

subgrade which will, hopefully, reduce the ongoing maintenance costs. The life expectancy of

the basketball court is estimated at 20 years while the life expectancy of the color coating is

approximately 5 years.

4.3 TOT LOT

4.3.1 General: For the purposes of this Study, the life expectancy of the Tot Lot is

approximately 12 years with replacement anticipated in approximately 4 years (2017) as

indicated in the previous Study. Please also note that the equipment itself could likely last

26

significantly longer; however, replacement is recommended to improve the appearance,

functionality and safety for residents and guests. The anticipated replacement cost of the Tot

Lot Equipment, in 2013 dollars, is $40,000.00

5. BUILDING EXTERIORS

5.1 SLATE ROOFING SYSTEMS

5.1.1 General:

5.1.1.1 Almost all buildings at the Glen are covered with Slate Roofing (Buckingham,

Vermont or Bangor slate). Throughout the last several years numerous original

Bangor slate roofs have been replaced with Vermont slate in accordance with

our recommendations. A survey of all roofing systems was originally

conducted in approximately 1995 (by Seal Engineering, Inc.) at which time the

type and condition of all roofing systems was catalogued. Since that time, REI

has overseen replacement of dozens of roofs and periodically updated the

originally prepared roof schedule.

5.1.1.2 Two buildings in Court 2 (3535-3541 and 3549-3555 S. Stafford St.) with

original Bangor slate are being replaced in 2013 and, for the purposes of this

study, are designated as new with a useful life of 100 years.

5.1.1.3 Following 2013, there are still 13 buildings with the original Bangor slate on a

portion of the roof. These roof areas are designated for replacement within the

next five years. We have slightly adjusted the replacement dates for a few of

these roofs to reflect changes in the suggested order of roof replacement that

was recommended in our most recent 2012 Slate Update. Two roofs in Court

5 (4118 and 4112-4116 36 Street South) were originally designated forth

replacement in 2014 but were replaced in 2012 due to necessity.

Consequently, the replacement of the roofing on the two buildings in Court 2

(see previous paragraph) was pushed from 2012 to 2013 and the three

buildings (two in Court 3 and one in Court 12) originally designated for

replacement last year (2013) have been pushed to the following year.

27

5.1.1.4 There is also one building with “Superslate” that is designated for replacement

in 2014.

5.1.1.5 Condition/Life Expectancy: Once all the original Bangor roofs have been

replaced with Vermont slate, a roof replacement project will likely not be

necessary for approximately 30 years; however, periodic maintenance and

repair will need to be performed. The original Vermont/Buckingham slate roofs

are in good condition and should provide 100 years of service as anticipated.

5.1.1.6 Replacement Cost: We reviewed the last four years of roof replacement

projects at the Glen to determine the average replacement unit cost and

calculated an average of $23.64 a square foot. This figure is very close to the

figure that was utilized during the previous study ($24.10); therefore, we have

left the figure in place.

5.1.2 Gutters and Downspouts

5.1.2.1 All roofs are drained via aluminum gutters and downspouts. In general, the

gutters and downspouts have been replaced in conjunction with roof

replacement work throughout the last several years.

5.1.2.2 A comprehensive gutter repair and replacement project was undertaken in

2010 following the massive snowstorms that occurred in February of that year.

The resulting snow and ice buildup tore off or damaged the existing hanging

gutters at dozens of locations throughout the Glen. At that time, we conducted

a comprehensive survey of all gutters and prepared construction documents

for repair, reinforcement/refastening and/or replacement of gutters. In general,

these repairs were designed to reinforce the outside edge of the gutters and to

provide heavy duty strapping (above and beyond industry standards) to ensure

that the gutters did not fail if a similar event occurs in the future.

5.1.2.3 Given the recent repair work, the gutters are generally in good condition and

should provide an additional 50+ years of service provided routine

maintenance and repair are performed. We will continue to specify

replacement of the gutters and downspouts in conjunction with replacement of

roofing unless the gutters at these locations were recently replaced. Also note

28

that we will continue to specify the installation of larger gutters to facilitate

drainage as has been our practice throughout the last several years.

5.1.2.4 Reserve Funding: We do not recommend allocating any reserve funding for

replacement of gutters and downspouts because this work is generally

incorporated into the roof replacement funding or is addressed via annual

maintenance. The Board should continue to allocate yearly maintenance

funding for repairs to the gutters and downspouts.

5.1.3 Chimney Caps:

5.1.3.1 General/History: All of the original masonry chimneys were capped with

copper caps approximately 15 years ago.

5.1.3.2 The copper chimney caps are in good condition and should provide an

additional 60 years of service.

5.1.3.3 The copper chimney caps were not accounted for on the most recent reserve

study. This may have been because the costs were assumed to be part of the

roof replacement cost.

5.1.3.4 The estimated replacement cost, per chimney cap, in 2013 dollars is

$1,500.00

5.2 FACADE

5.2.1 Brick/Stone Veneer:

5.2.1.1 General/History: The facades of all buildings at the Glen are comprised

primarily of brick masonry veneer or brick bearing walls. There are also a

number of buildings with stone veneer.

5.2.1.2 To facilitate estimation of necessary facade repairs we reviewed some project

data from a repair project that was performed at a neighboring community in

the late 1990's. This project consisted of isolated repairs to the brick veneer

throughout the property. Repairs were not comprehensive; instead, repairs

were targeted to areas which exhibited immediate need for repair. The

approximate cost of these repairs was around 200 thousand dollars.

29

Consequently, we have estimated the cost to perform repointing and

miscellaneous facade repairs at the Glen to be around $250,000.00 per cycle.

5.2.1.3 It is important to note that the frequency and quantity of necessary masonry

repairs varies significantly depending upon the quality of the brick, the mortar

and the craftsmanship. As a general rule, masonry veneer will require

comprehensive repointing within 50 years of installation; however, the

masonry at the Glen is significantly older, is in good condition and is not

immediately in need of comprehensive repointing. We would recommend that

a comprehensive masonry survey be performed, similar to the survey

performed in 2004, prior to the first round of repairs to identify and prioritize

the masonry repairs that will be required in the next 25 years.

5.2.1.4 For the purposes of the study, the recommended interval between masonry

repair projects is 8 years. Given that a project has not been performed in the

last 10 years, we recommend incorporating the first round of masonry repairs

within the next one to three years. For the purposes of this Study, these

repairs are included in Calendar Year 2014.

5.2.2 Brick Masonry Stoops:

5.2.2.1 General/History: All building front entrances at the Glen are accessed via brick

masonry stoops (181 total) that are covered with small roofs. The stoops are

typically fabricated with brick placed over a concrete, concrete block and/or

clay tile structural foundation. In 2005, REI conducted a comprehensive

survey of all brick masonry stoops and, subsequently, recommended

reconstruction of (over 5 phases) 56 separate stoops throughout the property.

In 2006, the Glen embarked on the first phase of stoop reconstruction (13

total) which was performed by C.A. Lindman. Subsequent to the 2006 project,

the Glen elected not to proceed with the remaining four phases due to

changing reserve priorities.

5.2.2.2 Condition/Recommendations: In general, the brick masonry stoops are in fair

condition given their age. However, we would still recommend that the Glen

budget for reconstruction of the remaining 56 stoops that were originally

30

identified. For the purposes of the Study, the remaining stoops have been

broken down into four phases occurring every other year starting in 2016. The

priority for the phasing has been left as-is (based on original study) but could

be modified if desirable or practical. It may be more cost effective to combine

Phases if funds are available.

5.2.2.3 During the 2006 project, certain hidden structural conditions were identified

during the course of the reconstruction work that resulted in additional work for

the contractor. C.A. Lindman indicated, at the time, that the pricing should

have been higher. Consequently, for the purposes of the Reserve Study, we

have increased unit pricing for stoop replacement and included a base

mobilization figure per stoop.

5.2.2.4 Condition/Life Expectancy: The life expectancy of the remaining 125 stoops is

estimated at 90 years. Consequently, the Board should allocate funding for

substantial stoop construction in approximately 20 years.

5.2.3 Shutters:

5.2.3.1 Inoperable vinyl shutters are installed throughout the property, generally on the

front elevation. The shutters were recently installed (2005) and are in good

condition. Life expectancy is estimated at 25 years although, periodically,

some shutters will need to be replaced. The anticipated replacement cost for

the shutters (in $2013) is approximately $75,000.

5.2.4 B-Unit Doors: The installation date of the existing front entry doors at the Apartment

Style Units (“B-Units”) is not known; however, based on appearance, the doors have been in

place for some time. Despite their age, the doors are in fair condition and should provide ten

additional years of service. The anticipated unit replacement cost for the front doors is $1,500

per door assuming standard sized doors with standard hardware are installed.

5.2.4.1 When the doors are replaced the Board may wish to incorporate new

electronic lock technology which would improve security and enable each

resident to have an independent access code for the common access door.

31

5.2.5 B-Unit Windows: As with the doors, the installation date of the common windows at

the B-Units is not known. The existing windows are in poor condition and should be replaced.

The anticipated unit replacement cost for the windows is $500 per window assuming that all

windows are replaced concurrently with a standard, vinyl framed replacement window. If the

Board wishes to install wood replacement windows, the price will be approximately 30 percent

higher.

6. BUILDING INTERIORS & SERVICES

6.1 INTERIORS

6.1.1 B-Unit Finishes: The existing finishes (carpeting, paint, etc.) in the common lobbies of

the B-Units were installed in 2006 at a cost of $50,220.00 or approximately $2,200 per

building. The anticipated replacement cost is based on the original replacement cost adjusted

for inflation since 2006 or $57,500.00. The life expectancy for the interior finishes is

approximately 10 to 12 years; therefore, for the purposes of this Study, replacement is

anticipated in 2018.

6.1.2 B-Unit Mailboxes: The B-Unit mailboxes were replaced in 2011, at a cost of around

$10,000.00, and are in excellent condition. The life expectancy of the mailboxes is

approximately 35 years.

6.1.3 Maintenance Office: The Maintenance Office, including the maintenance building,

pump/equipment room, storage areas, restrooms, etc., immediately adjacent to the pool,

underwent an extensive renovation in 2009 at a cost of around $450,000.00. This facility will

require significant maintenance through the years due to its function; however, complete

refurbishment (in a manner similar to the 2009 project) is not anticipated for many years. For

the purposes of this study, the life expectancy is listed at 40 years.

6.2 TOOLS/EQUIPMENT

32

6.2.1 B-Unit Carpet Cleaner: The Association purchased a self contained, commercial style

carpet cleaning unit in 2011 at a cost of $2,333.00. We have not inspected the unit but it is,

presumably, in good condition given its age. The anticipated life expectancy of this unit is 8

years assuming frequent maintenance is performed. For the purposes of this study the

replacement cost is estimated at $2,400.00.

6.2.2 Tractor + Accessories: The Association purchased a small lawn tractor in 2003 at a

cost of $2,600.00. Since that time, several tractor accessories have been purchased to

supplement the capabilities of the tractor. Our understanding is that the tractor is used

frequently by the on site maintenance personnel to perform a variety of tasks. The tractor is

now ten years old and is likely nearing the end of its useful life. For the purposes of the study,

the useful life is listed as two years with replacement anticipated in 2015. When the tractor is

replaced, the new tractor will likely need new accessories for compatibility; consequently, the

estimated replacement cost is $5,000.00.

6.2.3 Snow Blower: The Association purchased a snow blower in 2010 at a cost of

$1,840.00. Presumably, given its age, the snow blower is operating well and is in good

condition. The life expectancy of the snow blower is estimated at 10 years with replacement

occurring in 2023. The estimated replacement cost is $2,500.00.

6.2.4 Pipe Camera: The Association purchased a recording, pipe inspection camera in

1996 at an approximate cost of $10,000.00. The camera is still in operating condition;

however, technology has improved significantly since the purchase date and the Association

may wish to purchase a new camera in the next few years to take advantage of the improved

performance. Our understanding is that the primary impetus for purchasing the camera was to

facilitate inspection and maintenance of the exterior sewer laterals.

6.3 SERVICES

33

6.3.1 Replacement Reserve Study: Per the request of the Board, costs to perform the

reserve study are also included given that a study must be performed every five years and that

the costs to perform/update the study are significant.

34

Appendix AFairlington Glen Condominium

2013 Replacement Reserve Study

SUMMARY TABLE

Full Funding Analysis of Replacement Reserves

Appendix A1 Supporting Estimate for Parking Lot Full Funding Amount

Appendix A2 Supporting Estimate for Sidewalk Full Funding Amount

Appendix A3 Supporting Estimate for Curb and Gutter Full Funding Amount

Appendix A4 Supporting Estimate for Sanitary Sewer Full Funding Amount

Appendix A5 Supporting Estimate for Storm Drainage Full Funding Amount

Appendix A6 Supporting Estimate for Fencing Full Funding Amount

Appendix A7 Supporting Estimate for Exterior Lighting Full Funding Amount

Appendix A8 Supporting Estimate for Swimming Pool Full Funding Amount

Appendix A9 Supporting Estimate for Roofing Full Funding Amount

Appendix A10 Supporting Estimate for Masonry Stoop Repairs

Appendix A11 Supporting Estimate for Masonry Maintenance/Repointing

Appendix A12 Supporting Estimate for B-Unit Elements

35

Section Component

Year Last

Replaced if Known

Historical Cost If

Available

Replacement Cost

Estimated in 2003 Study

Replacement Cost


Replacement Cost

Estimated in 2012 Update

Remaining Useful Life

Estimated in 2013

Useful Life


Percent Depreciated

Estimated Replacement Cost

(2013)Fully Funded

Balance

Annual Depreciation

Cost1.0 Hardscape

1.1 Asphalt Pavement1.1.a Replace asphalt in parking lots $1,165,135 10 30 9 67% $1,184,942 $791,392 $39,4981.1.b Maintain asphalt in parking lots annually $18,081 1 1 0 100% $6,609 $6,609 $6,609

1.2 Concrete1.2.a Sidewalk Replacement (see "Sidewalks" tab) $255,930 $316,950 15 20 14 42% $395,174 $164,242 $19,7591.2.b Curb and Gutter Replacement (see "Curb/Gutter" tab) $163,656 $202,676 10 30 9 98% $228,576 $224,713 $7,619

2.0 Utilities2.1 Sanitary Sewers (see "Sewers" Tab)

2.1.a Relining - Terra Cotta (outside building footprint) $0 $1,117,976 41 50 40 19% $899,993 $171,909 $17,9192.1.b Relining/Replacement - Cast Iron (inside footprint) $0 n/a 20 84 19 55% $304,720 $168,227 $2,8062.1.c Sewer cleanouts $187,961 34 75 33 56% $191,156 $106,319 $2,5492.1.d Sewer manholes n/a 10 80 9 89% $55,800 $49,523 $698

2.2 Storm Drainage (see "Storm" Tab)2.2.a Storm drain piping $290,500 $312,215 47 86 42 52% $167,279 $86,480 $1,9412.2.b Storm drainage structures n/a n/a 25 69 29 58% $72,064 $41,778 $1,038

3.0 Miscellaneous Site Features3.1 Signage

3.1.a Replace Site Signage $6,400 $10,000 $10,748 9 25 8 68% $11,747.80 $7,989 $4703.3 Fencing (see "Fencing" Tab for lineal footage of fencing with unit cost information)

3.3.a Replace Treated Wood Patio Fencing 1997 $236,000 $247,500 $306,510 9 25 8 68% $404,064 $274,764 $16,1633.3.b Replace Split-Rail Fence at Ct. 4 2010 $4,024 $4,208 27 30 26 13% $504 $67 $173.3.c Perimeter Fence 1975 $10,000 $5,000 $35,000 $37,616 2 50 1 98% $66,000 $64,680 $1,3203.3.d Replace Pool Perimeter Fence 2003 $32,200 $32,200 $39,877 20 30 19 37% $32,000 $11,733 $1,0673.3.e Replace Pool Tennis Court Fence $24,400 $15,000 $16,121 12 30 11 63% $14,000 $8,867 $4673.3.f Replace Triple Tennis Court Fence 2011 $20,750 $23,000 $21,373 28 30 27 10% $21,000 $2,100 $7003.3.g Replace Paddle Ball Fence $5,000 $5,374 2 40 1 98% $7,800 $7,605 $1953.3.h Replace Short Basketball Court Fence 2003 $1,100 $1,100 $1,100 $1,362 20 30 19 37% $1,320 $484 $44

3.3 Handrails (see "Fencing" Tab for takeoff)3.3.a Replace Cast Iron Handrails 1945 n/a n/a n/a 15 80 14 83% $9,000 $7,425 $113

3.4 Exterior Lighting (see "Outdoor Lighting" tab)3.4.a Replace Carriage Light Poles and Heads 1973 $20,000 $104,000 $111,774 5 25 4 84% $46,500 $39,060 $1,8603.4.b ReFeed Carriage Light Pole Circuits n/a n/a n/a 5 35 4 89% $101,100 $89,546 $2,8893.4.c Replace Pole Lights at Swimming Pool n/a n/a n/a 15 50 14 72% $6,500 $4,680 $1303.4.d Replace Ceiling Fixtures at Entry to B-Units n/a n/a n/a 10 15 9 40% $3,450 $1,380 $230

Estimates for the Current Year (2013)

Appendix A - Full-Funding Analysis of Replacement Reserves

Summary Table

2013 Capital Reserve StudyFairlington Glen Condominium

1 of 3January 14, 2014

prepared by:Restoration Engineering, Inc.

Section Component

Year Last

Replaced if Known

Historical Cost If

Available

Replacement Cost


Replacement Cost


Replacement Cost



Estimated in 2013

Useful Life


Percent Depreciated


(2013)Fully Funded

Balance

Annual Depreciation

Cost



Summary Table

4.0 Recreational Features4.1 Swimming Pool (see "Swimming Pool" Tab)

4.1.a Whitecoat Pools 2009 $21,782 $11,500 $23,387 6 10 5 50% $25,330 $12,665 $2,5334.1.b Replace Coping Stones & Tiles $5,000 $14,908 6 25 5 80% $24,525 $19,620 $9814.1.c.1 Pool Deck Repairs 2009 $2,150 $3,000 $2,308 0 5 -1 120% $16,080 $19,296 $3,2164.1.c.2 Pool Deck Replacement $65,367 16 50 15 70% $97,150 $68,005 $1,9434.1.c.3 Pool Structure Repair (Plumbing + Concrete) 1974 $500,000 $559,408 26 60 25 58% $250,000 $145,833 $4,1674.1.d Replace Pool Covers $5,000 $12,615 6 12 5 58% $10,951 $6,388 $9134.1.e Replace Pool Pumps, Filters and Drains 2009 $24,625 $10,000 $26,439 6 10 5 50% $27,695 $13,848 $2,7704.1.f Replace Lifeguard Chairs 2006 1 @ $3,00 $10,000 $6,881 4 10 3 70% $7,208 $5,045 $7214.1.g Replace Large Canvas Awning At Pool 2005 $2,600 $3,083 2 10 1 90% $3,229 $2,907 $3234.1.h Replace Small Canvas Awning At Pool 2010 $3,096 $3,237 7 10 6 40% $3,390 $1,356 $339

4.2 Courts4.2.a Reapply Color Coat At Pool Tennis Court 2006 $12,620 $8,000 $13,500 $14,509 3 5 2 60% $10,000 $6,000 $2,0004.2.b Renovate/Reconstruct Pool Tennis Court 2011 $41,655 $20,000 $22,000 $42,905 13 15 12 20% $43,634 $8,727 $2,9094.2.c Reapply Color Coat At Triple Tennis Courts 2011 $10,000 $19,250 $19,827 4 5 3 40% $20,769 $8,308 $4,1544.2.d Renovate/Reconstruct Triple Tennis Courts 2011 $97,366 $45,000 $50,250 $100,287 18 20 17 15% $101,992 $15,299 $5,1004.2.e Reapply Color Coat at Basketball Court 2012 $4,080 $6,000 $4,350 $4,675 4 5 3 40% $4,897 $1,959 $9794.2.f Renovate/Reconstuct Basketball Court 2012 $17,000 $15,000 $16,600 $16,600 19 20 18 10% $17,389 $1,739 $869

4.3 Tot Lot4.3.a Replace Tot Lot 1996 $21,000 $15,000 $35,000 $40,138 4 12 3 75% $40,820 $30,615 $3,4024.3.b Replace Tot Lot table and seats 2007 $1,000 $1,147 6 12 5 58% $1,166 $680 $97

5.0 Building Exteriors5.1 Roofs (see "Roofing" tab)

5.1.a Roofing and Flashings (see supporting estimate) $4,207,400 $6,342,441 56 93 55 44% $6,450,263 $2,849,428 $73,7935.2 Façade

5.2.a Masonry Stoops (see "Masonry" Tab) $688,966 20 82 19 75% $726,171 $556,783 $8,5485.2.b Masonry Veneer Maintenance/Repointing $197,184 $244,198 2 12 1 92% $350,000 $320,833 $29,1675.2.c Replace Shutters $60,000 $74,306 17 25 16 36% $76,164 $27,419 $3,0475.2.d Replace B-Unit Doors (see "B-Units" Tab) $5,000 $33,350 $35,843 10 40 9 78% $34,500 $26,738 $8635.2.e Replace B-Unit Common Windows (see "B-Units" Tab) $11,500 $12,360 1 25 0 100% $23,000 $23,000 $920




Section Component

Year Last

Replaced if Known

Historical Cost If

Available

Replacement Cost


Replacement Cost


Replacement Cost



Estimated in 2013

Useful Life


Percent Depreciated


(2013)Fully Funded

Balance

Annual Depreciation

Cost



Summary Table

6.0 Building Interiors & Services6.1 Interiors

6.1.a Replace B-Unit Interior Finishes 2006 $50,220 $50,000 $57,592 5 12 4 67% $58,571 $39,047 $4,8816.1.b Replace B-Unit Mailboxes (see "B-Units" Tab) 2011 $9,959 $10,258 33 35 32 9% $11,500 $986 $3296.1.c Refurbish Maintenance Office & Bathhouses 2009 $446,909 $12,500 $479,836 36 40 35 13% $487,993 $60,999 $12,200

6.2 Tools/Equipment6.2.a Replace B-unit Carpet Cleaner 2011 $2,333 $2,403 6 8 5 38% $2,444 $916 $3056.2.b Replace Tractor + Accessories 2003 $2,600 $7,500 $2,000 $2,150 2 10 1 90% $5,000 $4,500 $5006.2.c Replace Snow Blower 2010 $1,840 8 10 7 30% $2,500 $750 $2506.2.d Replace Pipe Camera 1996 $10,000 3 15 2 87% $6,500 $5,633 $433

6.3 Services6.3.a Replacement Reserve Study 2013 $16,000 5 5 4 20% $15,000 $3,000 $3,000

Total Funded Components $13,187,129 $6,619,893 $301,746

Full-Funding Percentage




Using 2013 survey by Restoration Engineering

Replacement Only

Court Area (sq ft) Useful LifeCondition

(2013)Year to be Replaced


Percent Depreciated

Replacement Cost (CY)

Fully Funded Balance

Annual Depreciation

Cost (CY)1 9,100 30 Fair 2023 9 70% 84,905 59,434 2,830 2 8,700 30 Fair 2023 9 70% 81,173 56,821 2,706 3 8,800 30 Fair 2023 9 70% 82,106 57,474 2,737 4 9,400 30 Fair 2023 9 70% 87,704 61,393 2,923 5 8,200 30 Fair 2023 9 70% 76,508 53,556 2,550 6 8,400 30 Good 2023 9 70% 78,374 54,862 2,612 7 7,700 30 Good 2023 9 70% 71,843 50,290 2,395 8 4,900 30 Good 2023 9 70% 45,718 32,003 1,524 9 7,200 30 Good 2040 26 13% 67,178 8,957 2,239 10 8,600 30 Fair 2023 9 70% 80,240 56,168 2,675 11 10,400 30 Excellent 2023 9 70% 97,035 67,924 3,234 12 7,500 30 Good 2023 9 70% 69,977 48,984 2,333 13 8,000 30 Good 2023 9 70% 74,642 52,249 2,488 14 4,700 30 Excellent 2023 9 70% 43,852 30,697 1,462 15 10,700 30 Fair 2023 9 70% 99,834 69,884 3,328 16 4,700 30 Good 2023 9 70% 43,852 30,697 1,462 Total 127,000 30 10 67% 1,184,942 791,392 39,498

Appendix A1.1 - Supporting Estimate for Parking Lot Full Funding Amount (1.1a)

2013 Capital Reserve StudyFairlington Glen Condominium 2/27/2014


Appendix A1.2 - Supporting Estimate for Parking Lot - Maintenance/Replacement Schedule (1.1b)

Recommended Annual Asphalt Maintenance (all figures in 2013 dollars)

None Unit CostsSealcoat 0.15$ /sfOverlay 1.25$ /sfReplace* 8.25$ /sf

Court SF 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Replace

-$ 1,365.00$ -$ -$ 1,365.00$ -$ -$ 1,365.00$ -$ -$ 75,075.00$ None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Replace



-$ 870.00$ -$ -$ 870.00$ -$ -$ 870.00$ -$ -$ 47,850.00$ None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Replace

-$ 1,230.00$ -$ -$ 1,230.00$ -$ -$ 1,230.00$ -$ -$ 67,650.00$ Overlay None None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Replace10,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ 1,260.00$ -$ -$ 1,260.00$ -$ -$ 69,300.00$ None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None Replace

-$ -$ 1,155.00$ -$ -$ 1,155.00$ -$ -$ 1,155.00$ -$ 63,525.00$ None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None Replace

-$ -$ 735.00$ -$ -$ 735.00$ -$ -$ 735.00$ -$ 40,425.00$ None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None Overlay

-$ -$ 1,080.00$ -$ -$ 1,080.00$ -$ -$ 1,080.00$ -$ 9,000.00$ None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Replace

-$ 1,290.00$ -$ -$ 1,290.00$ -$ -$ 1,290.00$ -$ -$ 70,950.00$ None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None Replace




-$ -$ 705.00$ -$ -$ 705.00$ -$ -$ 705.00$ -$ 38,775.00$ None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Replace

-$ 1,605.00$ -$ -$ 1,605.00$ -$ -$ 1,605.00$ -$ -$ 88,275.00$ None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None None Sealcoat None Replace

-$ -$ 705.00$ -$ -$ 705.00$ -$ -$ 705.00$ -$ 38,775.00$

10,500.00$ 8,985.00$ 8,265.00$ -$ 10,245.00$ 8,265.00$ -$ 10,245.00$ 8,265.00$ -$ 9,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 958,650.00$

Annual Maint. $ (thru 2019) 6,608.57$

14 4700

15 10700

Annual "Maintenance"Annual Replacement Cost

16 4700

11 10400

12 7500

13 8000

8 4900

9 7200

10 8600

5 8200

6 8400

7 7700

2 8700

3 8800

4 5800

91001

-No action for this period-Sealcoat (2 layers) entire Court-1 1/2" asphalt overlay -Replace pavement and curb & gutter;



Appendix A2 - Supporting Estimate for Sidewalk Full Funding Amount (1.2.a)

Estimated Amounts1 From Arlington County Survey Map (1 inch = 50 feet)2 From Restoration Engineering Site Plan

Court Map Inches Linear Feet Square Feet Square Feet1 10.750 538 2,150 2,669 2 8.600 430 1,720 2,442 3 10.550 528 2,110 3,115 4 19.825 991 3,965 4,925 5 10.875 544 2,175 2,092 6 12.000 600 2,400 2,748 7 12.750 638 2,550 1,945 8 9.600 480 1,920 2,334 9 10.750 538 2,150 3,087 10 18.175 909 3,635 3,018 11 17.250 863 3,450 3,155 12 11.450 573 2,290 2,393 13 9.100 455 1,820 2,248 14 5.300 265 1,060 893 15 22.300 1,115 4,460 4,538 16 6.250 313 1,250 911 Pool Area 17.750 888 3,550 4,956 Total 213.275 10,664 42,655 47,469

$6.00$7.62

$8.32

$255,930$324,877

$395,174

Life expectancy 20 15

Total replacement cost -- CY

Sidewalks (2008)1

Replacement cost per sq ft (2003)Replacement cost per sq ft (2008)Replacement cost per sq ft (CY)

Total replacement cost -- 2003Total replacement cost -- 2008

Sidewalks (2013)2



Estimated Amounts1 2008 From Arlington County Survey Map (1 inch = 50 feet)2 2013 From Restoration Engineering Site PlanSection

Court Map Inches Linear feet Takeoff Status1 8.000 400 412 Overlaid2 7.500 375 402 Overlaid3 7.250 363 405 Overlaid4 9.250 463 497 Overlaid5 6.750 338 360 Overlaid6 7.375 369 413 Overlaid7 6.475 324 366 Overlaid8 6.375 319 320 Overlaid9 6.250 313 382 Replaced 10 7.475 374 409 Overlaid11 8.750 438 495 Overlaid12 6.875 344 402 Overlaid13 6.875 344 389 Overlaid14 8.250 413 497 Overlaid15 8.600 430 456 Overlaid16 7.875 394 468 Replaced Pool Area 11.000 550 470Total 130.925 6,546 7143

Replacement cost per linear ft (2003) $25.00Replacement cost per linear ft (CY) $31.73

Total replacement cost -- 2003 $163,656Total replacement cost -- CY $228,576

2023Life expectancy 30

Percent depreciated (2003) 68.3%Percent depreciated (2006) 78.3%

Curb and Gutter1

Anticipated Replacement Year

Appendix A3 - Supporting Estimate for Curb and Gutter Full Funding Amount (1.2.b

Curb and Gutter2



$120 Outside Relining Cost Per Foot (6" diameter)$148 Outside Relining Cost Per Foot (4" diameter)$195 Inside Relining Cost Per Foot (4" diameter)

$5,356 Average excavation cost

SEWER LATERALS

Court Building

Inside Length

(feet)

Outside Length

(feet)

Outside Diameter (inches)

Outside Cleanout?

(1=Yes) NotesReplaced or Relined

Year Last Replaced or Relined Useful Life

Remain. Useful Life

Percent Depreciated

Relining Cost (CY $)

Fully Funded Balance (CY $)

Annual Depreciation

Cost

Anticipated Year of Reline/

ReplaceReplaced

or Relined

Year Last Replaced

or RelinedUseful

LifeRemaining Useful Life

Percent Depreciated

Excavation & Relining Cost

(CY $)Fully Funded

Balance (CY $)

Annual Depreciation

Cost

Excavation & Relining Cost

(CY $)Fully Funded

Balance (CY $)

Annual Depreciation

Cost

1 3501-3503 25 50 6 1 Original 1943 80 9 89% $4,875 $4,327 $61 2022 RL 2009 50 45 10% $11,367 $1,137 $227 $16,242 $5,463 $2881 3507-3513 20 55 6 0 Original 1943 80 9 89% $3,900 $3,461 $49 2022 RL 2008 50 44 12% $11,969 $1,436 $239 $15,869 $4,897 $2881 3515-3519 20 65 6 0 Original 1943 80 9 89% $3,900 $3,461 $49 2022 RL 2008 50 44 12% $13,171 $1,581 $263 $17,071 $5,042 $3121 3521-3525 25 65 6 0 Original 1943 80 9 89% $4,875 $4,327 $61 2022 RL 2008 50 44 12% $13,171 $1,581 $263 $18,046 $5,907 $3241 3527-3529 25 45 6 0 concrete barrier Original 1943 80 9 89% $4,875 $4,327 $61 2022 1943 80 9 89% $10,766 $9,555 $135 $15,641 $13,882 $1962 3535-3541 25 64 6 0 Original 1943 80 9 89% $4,875 $4,327 $61 2022 RL 2009 50 45 10% $13,051 $1,305 $261 $17,926 $5,632 $3222 3543-3547 26 86 6 0 Original 1943 80 9 89% $5,070 $4,500 $63 2022 RL 2009 50 45 10% $15,696 $1,570 $314 $20,766 $6,069 $3772 3549-3555 20 70 6 0 Original 1943 80 9 89% $3,900 $3,461 $49 2022 RL 2009 50 45 10% $13,772 $1,377 $275 $17,672 $4,838 $3243 3561-3563 25 68 6 1 Original 1943 80 9 89% $4,875 $4,327 $61 2022 RL 2009 50 45 10% $13,532 $1,353 $271 $18,407 $5,680 $3323 3565-3567 25 53 6 1 Relined 2009 50 45 10% $4,875 $488 $98 2058 RL 2008 50 44 12% $11,728 $1,407 $235 $16,603 $1,895 $3323 3569-3573 25 75 6 1 RP 1978; RL 2008 Replaced 2008 80 74 8% $4,875 $366 $61 2087 RL 2008 50 44 12% $14,373 $1,725 $287 $19,248 $2,090 $3483 3575-3579 25 64 4 1 Original 1943 80 9 89% $4,875 $4,327 $61 2022 RP 1983 50 19 62% $14,800 $9,176 $296 $19,675 $13,502 $3573 3581-3585 25 61 6 1 Original 1943 80 9 89% $4,875 $4,327 $61 2022 RL 2009 50 45 10% $12,690 $1,269 $254 $17,565 $5,596 $3154 4101-4111 21 199 6 0 Original 1943 85 14 84% $4,095 $3,421 $48 2027 RL 2009 50 45 10% $29,282 $2,928 $586 $33,377 $6,349 $6344 4113-4117 23 109 6 0 Original 1943 85 14 84% $4,485 $3,746 $53 2027 RL 2009 50 45 10% $18,461 $1,846 $369 $22,946 $5,592 $4224 4119-4123 20 81 6 0 Original 1943 85 14 84% $3,900 $3,258 $46 2027 RL 2009 50 45 10% $15,095 $1,509 $302 $18,995 $4,767 $3484 4125-4139 27 27 6 0 Original 1943 85 14 84% $5,265 $4,398 $62 2027 RL 2009 50 45 10% $8,602 $860 $172 $13,867 $5,258 $2345 4100-4110 20 74 6 0 Original 1943 85 14 84% $3,900 $3,258 $46 2027 RL 2009 50 45 10% $14,253 $1,425 $285 $18,153 $4,683 $3315 4112-4116 20 76 6 0 Original 1943 85 14 84% $3,900 $3,258 $46 2027 RL 2009 50 45 10% $14,493 $1,449 $290 $18,393 $4,707 $3365 4118 17 93 6 0 Original 1943 85 14 84% $3,315 $2,769 $39 2027 RL 2009 50 45 10% $16,537 $1,654 $331 $19,852 $4,423 $3705 4122-4128 20 41 6 1 Original 1943 85 14 84% $3,900 $3,258 $46 2027 RL 2009 50 45 10% $10,285 $1,029 $206 $14,185 $4,286 $2526 4130-4144 20 31 6 1 Original 1943 85 14 84% $3,900 $3,258 $46 2027 RL 2008 50 44 12% $9,083 $1,090 $182 $12,983 $4,348 $2286 4146-4156 20 62 6 0 Original 1943 85 14 84% $3,900 $3,258 $46 2027 RL 2008 50 44 12% $12,810 $1,537 $256 $16,710 $4,795 $3026 4158-4170 20 72 6 1 $17,300 Original 1943 85 14 84% $3,900 $3,258 $46 2027 RP 2009 50 45 10% $18,890 $1,889 $378 $22,790 $5,147 $4246 4172-4176 20 17 6 0 Original 1943 85 14 84% $3,900 $3,258 $46 2027 RL 2008 50 44 12% $7,400 $888 $148 $11,300 $4,146 $1947 4200-4208 20 20 6 1 Original 1943 85 14 84% $3,900 $3,258 $46 2027 RP 2002 50 38 24% $7,760 $1,863 $155 $11,660 $5,120 $2017 4210-4212 20 132 6 1 Original 1943 85 14 84% $3,900 $3,258 $46 2027 RL 2005 50 41 18% $21,226 $3,821 $425 $25,126 $7,078 $4708 3601-3609 20 51 6 1 Original 1943 90 19 79% $3,900 $3,077 $43 2032 RL 2009 50 45 10% $11,488 $1,149 $230 $15,388 $4,225 $2738 3611-3613 20 115 6 1 Original 1943 90 19 79% $3,900 $3,077 $43 2032 RP 2001 50 37 26% $19,183 $4,987 $384 $23,083 $8,064 $4278 3615-3625 20 110 6 1 Original 1943 90 19 79% $3,900 $3,077 $43 2032 RL 2007 50 43 14% $18,581 $2,601 $372 $22,481 $5,678 $4159 3513-3523 8 101 6 1 Original 1943 90 19 79% $1,560 $1,231 $17 2032 RL 2007 50 43 14% $17,499 $2,450 $350 $19,059 $3,681 $3679 3525-3533 25 176 6 1 Original 1943 90 19 79% $4,875 $3,846 $54 2032 RP 2001 50 37 26% $26,517 $6,894 $530 $31,392 $10,740 $5859 3535-3549 20 50 6 1 Original 1943 90 19 79% $3,900 $3,077 $43 2032 RP 2001 50 37 26% $11,367 $2,956 $227 $15,267 $6,032 $27110 4301-4309 20 60 6 1 $33,650 Original 1943 90 19 79% $3,900 $3,077 $43 2032 RP 2009 50 45 10% $36,743 $3,674 $735 $40,643 $6,751 $77810 4311-4321 20 200 6 1 $45,450 Original 1943 90 19 79% $3,900 $3,077 $43 2032 RP 2007 50 43 14% $29,402 $4,116 $588 $33,302 $7,193 $63110 4323-4343 20 138 6 1 Original 1943 90 19 79% $3,900 $3,077 $43 2032 RL 2004 50 40 20% $21,948 $4,390 $439 $25,848 $7,466 $48211 3588-3598 20 57 6 1 Reline 2009 50 45 10% $3,900 $390 $78 2058 RL 2007 50 43 14% $12,209 $1,709 $244 $16,109 $2,099 $32211 4201-4209 20 118 4 1 Original 1943 90 19 79% $3,900 $3,077 $43 2032 RP 1983 50 19 62% $22,768 $14,116 $455 $26,668 $17,193 $49911 4215-4223 20 115 6 1 Original 1943 90 19 79% $3,900 $3,077 $43 2032 RL 2007 50 43 14% $19,183 $2,686 $384 $23,083 $5,762 $42711 4227-4237 20 64 6 1 Original 1943 90 19 79% $3,900 $3,077 $43 2032 RL 2007 50 43 14% $13,051 $1,827 $261 $16,951 $4,904 $30412 3548-3562 20 45 6 1 Original 1943 95 24 75% $3,900 $2,915 $41 2037 RP 2000 50 36 28% $10,766 $3,015 $215 $14,666 $5,929 $25612 3564-3574 20 215 6 1 Original 1943 95 24 75% $3,900 $2,915 $41 2037 RP 2000 50 36 28% $31,206 $8,738 $624 $35,106 $11,652 $66512 3576-3584 20 80 6 1 Original 1943 95 24 75% $3,900 $2,915 $41 2037 RL 2003 50 39 22% $14,974 $3,294 $299 $18,874 $6,209 $341

Appendix A4 - Supporting Estimate for Sewer Full Funding Amount (2.1)

TotalInside Section Outside Section


1 of 22/27/2014


$120 Outside Relining Cost Per Foot (6" diameter)$148 Outside Relining Cost Per Foot (4" diameter)$195 Inside Relining Cost Per Foot (4" diameter)

$5,356 Average excavation cost

SEWER LATERALS

Appendix A4 - Supporting Estimate for Sewer Full Funding Amount (2.1)

TotalInside Section Outside Section13 3512-3522 20 150 6 1 connected to 4204 35th Original 1943 95 24 75% $3,900 $2,915 $41 2037 RP 2002 50 38 24% $23,391 $5,614 $468 $27,291 $8,528 $50913 3524-3532 20 185 6 1 Original 1943 95 24 75% $3,900 $2,915 $41 2037 RL 2004 50 40 20% $27,599 $5,520 $552 $31,499 $8,434 $59313 3534-3544 20 140 6 1 Original 1943 95 24 75% $3,900 $2,915 $41 2037 RP 2000 50 36 28% $22,188 $6,213 $444 $26,088 $9,127 $48514 4202-4210 + 3500 20 22 6 1 Original 1943 95 24 75% $3,900 $2,915 $41 2037 RP 2002 50 38 24% $8,001 $1,920 $160 $11,901 $4,835 $20114 4216-4218 20 75 6 1 Original 1943 95 24 75% $3,900 $2,915 $41 2037 RL 2007 50 43 14% $14,373 $2,012 $287 $18,273 $4,927 $32915 4226-4234 20 50 6 1 Reline 2009 50 45 10% $3,900 $390 $78 2058 RL 2008 50 44 12% $11,367 $1,364 $227 $15,267 $1,754 $30515 4236-4244 20 95 6 1 Original 1943 95 24 75% $3,900 $2,915 $41 2037 RL 2008 50 44 12% $16,778 $2,013 $336 $20,678 $4,928 $37715 4246-4254 20 75 6 1 Reline 2009 50 45 10% $3,900 $390 $78 2058 RL 2008 50 44 12% $14,373 $1,725 $287 $18,273 $2,115 $36515 4256-4264 20 78 6 1 Original 1943 95 24 75% $3,900 $2,915 $41 2037 RL 2008 50 44 12% $14,734 $1,768 $295 $18,634 $4,683 $33615 4266-4274 20 91 6 1 Reline 2009 50 45 10% $3,900 $390 $78 2058 RL 2008 50 44 12% $16,297 $1,956 $326 $20,197 $2,346 $40415 4276-4284 20 50 6 1 Original 1943 95 24 75% $3,900 $2,915 $41 2037 RL/RP 2003 50 39 22% $11,367 $2,501 $227 $15,267 $5,416 $26816 4300-4304 20 61 6 1 Original 1943 95 24 75% $3,900 $2,915 $41 2037 RL 2007 50 43 14% $12,690 $1,777 $254 $16,590 $4,691 $29516 4310-4320 20 70 4 1 Original 1943 95 24 75% $3,900 $2,915 $41 2037 RP 1980 50 16 68% $15,685 $10,666 $314 $19,585 $13,580 $355

Totals (CY $) 1172 40 $228,540 $168,227 $2,806 $899,993 $171,909 $17,919 $1,128,533 $340,136 $20,725

Averages 84 20 $4,081 41 19% $16,071 $20,152 $6,074 $370

SEWER CLEANOUTS

buildings with cleanouts (CY) 40buildings without cleanouts 16

replacement cost per cleanout (CY $) 3,414 total replacement cost of all cleanouts (CY $) 191,156

assumed life expectancy for cleanouts 75 1172assume existing cleanouts were 20 years old on average in 2007 234.4average age of existing cleanouts in current year 27

36% accumulated depreciation of existing cleanouts in current year100% equivalent depreciation applied to buildings without cleanouts

54% total percent depreciated76,180.00$

34 remaining useful years of life of sewer cleanouts

Total Interior Lateral Contingency Allocation

Additional Unit Cost for Interior Lateral ReplacementThis is an additional unit cost (above and beyond standard relining cost allocated above, which accounts for the difficulty of working within the finished basement and accounting for damage and replacement of certain interior finishes.

325.00$ /lf

Contingency Percentage*For the purposes of this study it is assumed that, at a certain percentage of locations, relining of the interior cast iron laterals will not be possible and complete replacement will be necessary

20%

Total Lineal Footage of Interior Cast Iron LateralTotal Lineal Footage Estimated for Complete Replacement


2 of 22/27/2014


Court Type

Size (Diameter in Inches) From To

Length(ft)

Age (yrs)

Useful Life (yrs)

Remaining Service Life

Percent Deprec. Installation Cost

Relining Cost$2013

Repl. Cost$2013


1 Terra Cotta 12" Parking Lot Catch Basin Arl. County Main - S. Stafford Street

170 70 100 30 70% $ 23,800.00 $ 16,660.00

1 Corrugated PE 4" Common Area betweeen 3519B and 3521

French Drain 100 2 20 18 10% $ 1,138.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 150.00


154 70 100 30 70% $ 21,560.00 $ 15,092.00

2 PVC 6" Tie in with Orangeburg pipe behind 3555 (see below)

Arl. County Catch Basin - S. Stafford Street

70 8 100 92 8% $ 8,400.00 $ 672.00

2 Orangeburg 6" Catch Basin behind 3551 Tie in with PVC (see above) 68 70 75 5 93% $ 8,160.00 $ 7,616.00 9 PVC S&D 6" Front yard of 3519 Catch Basin behind Court 16 150 5 100 95 5% $ 12,000.00 $ 15,232.80 $ 761.64 9 PVC S&D 4" Misc. downspouts and

basins from 3517 to 3525Main 6" PVC line (see previous) 80 5 100 95 5% $ 2,500.00 $ 3,173.50 $ 158.67

9 PVC S&D 3" Misc. downspouts and basins from 3517 to 3525

4" PVC line (see previous) 36 5 100 95 5% $ 1,500.00 $ 1,904.10 $ 95.20

10 PVC 6" Catch Basin at NW corner of parking lot

Catch Basin at NE corner of parking lot

100 3 100 97 3% $ 16,500.00 $ 17,543.17 $ 526.30

10 Terra Cotta 8" Catch basin at NE corner of parking lot

Yard Inlet Catch Basin in common area

64 70 100 30 70% $ 8,000.00 $ 5,600.00

10 Terra Cotta 8" Yard Inlet Catch Basin in common area

12" Diameter Line from Tot Lot Catch Basin

123 70 100 30 70% $ 15,375.00 $ 10,762.50

11 Corrugated PE 4" Trench between Pool Amenities Building and 4223

36 5 20 15 25% $ 900.00 $ 225.00

11 PVC S&D 4" Trench between Pool Amenities Building and 4223

70 5 50 45 10% $ 1,750.00 $ 175.00

11 Terra Cotta 6" Culvert beneath sidewalk to Swimming Pool entrance

20 70 100 30 70% $ 1,900.00 $ 1,330.00


98 70 100 30 70% $ 13,720.00 $ 9,604.00


76 70 100 30 70% $ 10,640.00 $ 7,448.00

14 Terra Cotta 12" Yard Inlet Catch Basin in common area

Arl. County Main - S. 35th Street 98 70 100 30 70% $ 13,720.00 $ 9,604.00

Averages 86 47 $ 115,215.00 $ 52,063.57

$ 86,480.31 52%

FULLY FUNDED TOTAL

Repair Options

$ 167,278.57 PIPING TOTAL

Overall Depreciation

Appendix A5 - Supporting Estimate for Storm Drainage Full Funding Amount (2.2)

STORM DRAINAGE PIPING


1 of 22/27/2014


Appendix A5 - Supporting Estimate for Storm Drainage Full Funding Amount (2.2)

Court Type LocationAge (yrs)

Useful Life (yrs)

Remaining Service Life

Percent Deprec. Installation Cost

Repl. Cost$2013


1 Grade Inlet Catch Basin

70 100 30 70% unknown $ 5,000.00 $ 3,500.00

1 French Drain 2 20 18 10% $ 2,452.00 $ 3,112.57 $ 311.26 2 Grade Inlet Catch

Basin70 100 30 70% unknown $ 5,000.00 $ 3,500.00

2 and 3 Yard Inlet Catch Basin 70 100 30 70% unknown $ 5,000.00 $ 3,500.00 9 Miscellaneous PE

Catch Basins5 20 15 25% $ 4,000.00 $ 5,077.60 $ 1,269.40


70 100 30 70% unknown $ 5,000.00 $ 3,500.00


70 100 30 70% unknown $ 5,000.00 $ 3,500.00

10 Trench Drain 3 30 27 10% $ 7,500.00 $ 7,974.17 $ 797.42 10 Yard Inlet Catch Basin 70 100 30 70% unknown $ 5,000.00 $ 3,500.00

10 and Tot Lot

Yard Inlet Catch Basin 70 100 30 70% unknown $ 5,000.00 $ 3,500.00

9, 15 and Tot

Lot

Miscellaneous PE Catch Basins

0 20 20 0% $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ -

11 Miscellaneous PE Catch Basins

10 20 10 50% unknown $ 1,200.00 $ 600.00


70 100 30 70% unknown $ 5,000.00 $ 3,500.00


70 100 30 70% unknown $ 5,000.00 $ 3,500.00

13 and 14


0 20 20 0% $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ -

13 and 14

Yard Inlet Catch Basin 70 100 30 70% unknown $ 5,000.00 $ 3,500.00

15 and 16


4 20 16 20% unknown $ 1,500.00 $ 300.00

16 Yard Inlet Catch Basin 70 100 30 70% unknown $ 5,000.00 $ 3,500.00 Averages 69 25

$ - $ 72,064.34

$ 41,778.07 58%

FULLY FUNDED TOTAL

NW corner of parking lot

Along Fence Line behind 4276-4284 South 35th Street

DEPRECIATION TOTAL

Common Area between Tot Lot, Swings, and Court 10

Common Area between Courts 9 and 15 extending toward Tot Lot

Common Area behind 4216 South 35th Street

Common Area behind 4210 South 35th Street

Front yards of 3515, 17, 19, 21 and 23

Common Area between Court 11 and Pool House

STRUCTURES TOTAL $ 72,064.34

Repair Options

Common Area betweeen 3519B and 3521

Common Area in Center of Court

Back of Parking Lot

Along North Side of Parking Lot



Common Area between Courts 2 and 3

Common Area between/behind 4304 and 4310 South 35th

STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES

Back of Parking Lot

NE corner of parking lot


2 of 22/27/2014


Location

LF of Treated Wood Patio Fence

LF of Chain Link Fence (10')

LF of Chain Link Perimeter Fence (6')

LF of Chain Link Fence (3')

LF of Aluminum Fencing - 6'

LF of Vinyl Split Rail Fencing

LF of Wood Split Rail Fencing

Wrought Iron Railings (per Section)

$ Totals per Location

Court 1 1081 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32,962.88$ Court 2 874 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,657.00$ Court 3 951 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29,680.50$ Court 4 894 0 0 0 0 300 0 1 35,276.75$ Court 5 653 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 22,616.50$ Court 6 989 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31,064.50$ Court 7 525 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 16,912.50$ Court 8 604 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 19,772.00$ Court 9 848 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 26,314.00$ Court 10 939 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29,074.25$ Court 11 910 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,739.75$ Court 12 843 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 26,836.50$ Court 13 844 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 25,966.00$ Court 14 486 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,823.00$ Court 15 1364 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 41,827.00$ Court 16 445 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,564.88$ Triple Tennis Court 0 525 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,000.00$ Single Tennis Court 0 350 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,000.00$ Swimming Pool 0 0 0 0 400 0 0 0 32,000.00$ Tot Lot 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 280.00$ Paddle Ball Court 0 195 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,800.00$ Basketball Court 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 1,320.00$ Perimeter Fencing 2200 66,000.00$

Total 13248 1070 2200 80 400 300 36 40 563,488.00$

Unit Replacement Cost(Current Year - 2013$) $ 30.50 $ 40.00 30.00$ 16.50$ 80.00$ 26.00$ 14.00$ 225.00$

Replacement Cost (Current Year) $ 404,064.00 $ 42,800.00 $ 66,000.00 $ 1,320.00 $ 32,000.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 504.00 $ 9,000.00

Appendix A6 - Supporting Estimate for Fencing Full Funding Amount (3.3)



LocationExterior Light

Poles

Exterior Conductor/ Conduit (lf)

Commercial Pole Lights

Sconce Lights at Rear Entries1

Entry Soffit Fixtures at

non-B Units1

Entry Soffit Fixtures at B

Units

$ Totals per Location (excluding non-

common elements)Court 1 12 500 0 24 25 1 $ 9,150.00 Court 2 9 450 0 20 14 3 $ 8,100.00 Court 3 11 500 0 21 15 3 $ 9,200.00 Court 4 18 800 0 21 19 1 $ 14,250.00 Court 5 7 425 0 15 13 1 $ 7,000.00 Court 6 11 600 0 24 24 0 $ 9,950.00 Court 7 6 500 0 13 4 3 $ 7,950.00 Court 8 13 500 0 14 12 1 $ 9,400.00 Court 9 10 500 0 20 18 1 $ 8,650.00 Court 10 14 550 0 23 21 1 $ 10,250.00 Court 11 14 700 0 22 22 0 $ 11,900.00 Court 12 12 400 0 20 18 1 $ 7,950.00 Court 13 11 500 0 19 15 2 $ 9,050.00 Court 14 8 350 0 10 6 2 $ 6,500.00 Court 15 18 800 0 32 28 2 $ 14,400.00 Court 16 6 350 0 10 8 1 $ 5,850.00 Triple Tennis Court 0 0 0 0 0 $ - Single Tennis Court 0 0 0 0 0 $ - Swimming Pool 0 13 0 0 0 $ 6,500.00 Tot Lot 6 0 0 0 0 $ 1,500.00 Paddle Ball Court 0 0 0 0 0 $ - Basketball Court 0 0 0 0 0 $ -

Total 186 8425 13 308 262 23 $ 157,550.00

Unit Replacement Cost(Current Year) $ 250.00 $ 12.00 $ 500.00 50.00$ 95.00$ 150.00$

Replacement Cost (Current Year) $ 46,500.00 $ 101,100.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 15,400.00 $ 24,890.00 $ 3,450.00

Appendix A7 - Supporting Estimate for Exterior Lighting Full Funding Amount (3.4)

1Not Common Elements (Excluded from Summary Table Calculations)



Swimming Pool Items Qty Unit

Swimming Pools 2930 sfCoping 327 lfPerimeter Tile 327 lfPool Deck 6700 sf

Unit Cost Descriptions Unit Cost Unit Qty Unit Total ($)WhiteCoat Pool 6.50$ /sf 3897 sf 25,329.85$ Replace Coping & Per Tile 75.00$ /lf 327 lf 24,525.00$ Repair Pool Deck (7.5%) 32.00$ /sf 503 sf 16,080.00$ Replace Pool Deck 14.50$ /sf 6700 sf 97,150.00$ Pool Structure Repair 250,000.00$ Pool Cover (Area + 15%) 3.25$ /sf 3370 sf 10,950.88$

Appendix A8 - Supporting Estimate for Swimming Pool Full Funding Amount (4.1)



CY: 2014Cost/sq. ft.: $24.51

Roofs Scheduled for Replacement -- Based on Restoration Engineering Estimates

Court Building NotesNumber of Roofs

Year Last Replaced

(Actual)

Year to be Replaced (Planned)

Useful Life


Percent Depreciated

(CY)Roof Area

(sq ft)

Est. Replacement

Cost (CY $)


(CY)

Annual Depreciation

Cost (CY) 1 3501-3503 Vermont 1.00 2010 2110 100 96 4% 3,200 $78,438 $3,138 $7841 3507-3513 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 4,800 $117,656 $83,536 $1,1771 3515-3519 Bangor 1.00 2006 2106 100 92 8% 6,000 $147,070 $11,766 $1,4711 3521-3525 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 3,500 $85,791 $60,912 $8581 3527-3529 Vermont 1.00 2005 2105 100 91 9% 4,000 $98,047 $8,824 $9802 3535-3541B Bangor 0.50 2013 2113 100 99 1% 3,400 $83,340 $833 $8332 3535-3541F Bangor 0.50 2013 2113 100 99 1% 3,400 $83,340 $833 $8332 3543-3547 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 5,500 $134,815 $95,718 $1,3482 3549-3555B Bangor 0.50 2013 2113 100 99 1% 3,800 $93,145 $931 $9312 3549-3555F Bangor 0.50 2013 2113 100 99 1% 3,800 $93,145 $931 $9313 3561-3563 Superslate 1.00 1980 2014 50 0 100% 3,200 $78,438 $78,438 $1,5693 3565-3567 Vermont 1.00 2007 2107 100 93 7% 3,000 $73,535 $5,147 $7353 3569-3573 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 4,800 $117,656 $83,536 $1,1773 3575-3579B Vermont 0.50 2002 2102 100 88 12% 1,900 $46,572 $5,589 $4663 3575-3579F Bangor 0.50 2014 50 0 100% 1,900 $46,572 $46,572 $9313 3581-3585B Vermont 0.50 2004 2104 100 90 10% 2,300 $56,377 $5,638 $5643 3581-3585F Vermont 0.50 2004 2104 100 90 10% 2,300 $56,377 $5,638 $5644 4101-4111 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 3,700 $90,693 $64,392 $9074 4113-4117Bt Vermont 0.50 2011 2111 100 97 3% 1,400 $34,316 $1,029 $3434 4113-4117To Vermont 0.50 1996 2096 100 82 18% 1,800 $44,121 $7,942 $4414 4119-4123B2 Vermont 0.25 1996 2096 100 82 18% 1,000 $24,512 $4,412 $2454 4119-4123F/B Vermont 0.75 2012 2112 100 98 2% 3,100 $75,986 $1,520 $7604 4125-4139 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 6,000 $147,070 $104,420 $1,4715 4118 Vermont 1.00 2012 2112 100 98 2% 4,400 $107,852 $2,157 $1,0795 4100-4110 Buckingham 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 3,700 $90,693 $64,392 $9075 4112-4116B Vermont 0.50 2012 2112 100 98 2% 2,200 $53,926 $1,079 $5395 4112-4116F Vermont 0.50 2012 2112 100 98 2% 2,200 $53,926 $1,079 $5395 4122-4128 Vermont 1.00 2003 2103 100 89 11% 4,400 $107,852 $11,864 $1,0796 4130-4144 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 6,000 $147,070 $104,420 $1,4716 4146-4156 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 3,600 $88,242 $62,652 $8826 4158-4170 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 4,500 $110,303 $78,315 $1,1036 4172-4176 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 3,000 $73,535 $52,210 $7357 4200-4208B Vermont 0.50 2003 2103 100 89 11% 3,350 $82,114 $9,033 $8217 4200-4208F Vermont 0.50 2011 2111 100 97 3% 3,350 $82,114 $2,463 $8217 4210-4212B Vermont 0.50 2011 2111 100 97 3% 2,500 $61,279 $1,838 $6137 4210-4212F Vermont 0.50 1998 2098 100 84 16% 2,500 $61,279 $9,805 $6138 3601-3609B Vermont 0.50 2000 2100 100 86 14% 2,000 $49,023 $6,863 $4908 3601-3609F Bangor 0.50 2015 50 1 98% 2,000 $49,023 $48,043 $9808 3611-3613 Vermont 1.00 2003 2103 100 89 11% 3,200 $78,438 $8,628 $7848 3615-3625 Vermont 1.00 2006 2106 100 92 8% 3,600 $88,242 $7,059 $8829 3513-3523 Buckingham 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 4,400 $107,852 $76,575 $1,0799 3525-3533B Vermont 0.50 1999 2099 100 85 15% 2,900 $71,084 $10,663 $7119 3525-3533F Bangor 0.50 2017 50 3 94% 2,900 $71,084 $66,819 $1,4229 3535-3549B Vermont 0.50 2001 2101 100 87 13% 3,900 $95,596 $12,427 $9569 3535-3549F Bangor 0.50 2017 50 3 94% 3,900 $95,596 $89,860 $1,91210 4301-4309B Vermont 0.50 2003 2103 100 89 11% 2,000 $49,023 $5,393 $49010 4301-4309F Bangor 0.50 2017 50 3 94% 2,000 $49,023 $46,082 $98010 4311-4321 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 5,600 $137,266 $97,459 $1,37310 4323-4343B Bangor 0.50 2015 50 1 98% 4,300 $105,400 $103,292 $2,10810 4323-4343F Vermont 0.50 2000 2100 100 86 14% 4,300 $105,400 $14,756 $1,05411 3588-3598 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 4,400 $107,852 $76,575 $1,07911 4201-4209 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 4,000 $98,047 $69,613 $98011 4215-4223 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 3,500 $85,791 $60,912 $85811 4227-4237 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 5,200 $127,461 $90,497 $1,27511 Pool Vermont 1.00 2009 2109 100 95 5% 3,000 $73,535 $3,677 $735

Appendix A9 - Supporting Estimate for Roofing Full Funding Amount (5.1)


1 of 22/27/2014


CY: 2014Cost/sq. ft.: $24.51

Roofs Scheduled for Replacement -- Based on Restoration Engineering Estimates

Court Building NotesNumber of Roofs

Year Last Replaced

(Actual)

Year to be Replaced (Planned)

Useful Life


Percent Depreciated

(CY)Roof Area

(sq ft)

Est. Replacement

Cost (CY $)


(CY)

Annual Depreciation

Cost (CY)

Appendix A9 - Supporting Estimate for Roofing Full Funding Amount (5.1)

12 3548-3562 Buckingham 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 7,000 $171,582 $121,823 $1,71612 3564-3574B Bangor 0.50 2014 50 0 100% 3,500 $85,791 $85,791 $1,71612 3564-3574F Vermont 0.50 1997 2097 100 83 17% 3,500 $85,791 $14,584 $85812 3576-3584B Vermont 0.50 1998 2098 100 84 16% 1,900 $46,572 $7,452 $46612 3576-3584F Bangor 0.50 2016 50 2 96% 1,900 $46,572 $44,709 $93113 3512-3522B Bangor 0.50 2016 50 2 96% 2,800 $68,633 $65,888 $1,37313 3512-3522F Vermont 0.50 1995 2095 100 81 19% 2,800 $68,633 $13,040 $68613 3524-3532 Vermont 1.00 2010 2110 100 96 4% 4,000 $98,047 $3,922 $98013 3534-3544B Vermont 0.50 1998 2098 100 84 16% 3,500 $85,791 $13,727 $85813 3534-3544F Bangor 0.50 2016 50 2 96% 3,500 $85,791 $82,359 $1,71614 4202-4210B + 3500 Vermont 0.38 2004 2104 100 90 10% 1,500 $36,768 $3,677 $36814 4202-4210B2 + 350 Vermont 0.25 1996 2096 100 82 18% 1,000 $24,512 $4,412 $24514 4202-4210F + 3500 Bangor 0.38 2014 50 0 100% 1,500 $36,768 $36,768 $73514 4216-4218 Vermont 1.00 2010 2110 100 96 4% 4,000 $98,047 $3,922 $98015 4226-4234 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 2,200 $53,926 $38,287 $53915 4236-4244B Vermont 0.50 1998 2098 100 84 16% 2,700 $66,182 $10,589 $66215 4236-4244F Bangor 0.50 2015 50 1 98% 2,700 $66,182 $64,858 $1,32415 4246-4254B Vermont 0.50 2007 2107 100 93 7% 1,800 $44,121 $3,088 $44115 4246-4254F Bangor 0.50 2017 50 3 94% 1,800 $44,121 $41,474 $88215 4256-4264 Vermont 1.00 2007 2107 100 93 7% 3,600 $88,242 $6,177 $88215 4266-4274B Vermont 0.25 1999 2099 100 85 15% 1,200 $29,414 $4,412 $29415 4266-4274F Vermont 0.75 1999 2099 100 85 15% 3,350 $82,114 $12,317 $82115 4276-4284 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 2,400 $58,828 $41,768 $58816 4300-4304 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 4,000 $98,047 $69,613 $98016 4310-4320 Vermont 1.00 2043 100 29 71% 4,400 $107,852 $76,575 $1,079Totals 57.00 263,150 $6,450,263 $2,849,428 $73,793Avg. Per Building 4,617 $113,163 $49,990 $1,295Avg. Per Square Foot 93 56 44% $24.51 $10.83


2 of 22/27/2014


/sf +$1,500 per stoop for mobilization, temp protections, etc.

Court Address Area (SF)Bond

Pattern

Year Last Replaced

(Actual)Year to be Replaced

Useful Life


(CY)

Percent Depreciated

(CY)Replacement Cost

(2006)


(CY)Fully Funded Balance (CY)

Annual Depreciation Cost (CY)

1 3503 S. Stafford 76 50 26.39 basket 2006 2080 75 67 11% $2,872 $3,083 $329 $419 3525-27 S. Utah 110 63 48.13 running 2006 2080 75 67 11% $3,432 $4,388 $468 $599 3531-33 S. Utah 110 63 48.13 running 2006 2080 75 67 11% $3,432 $4,388 $468 $5912 3560 S. Stafford 76 50 26.39 basket 2006 2080 75 67 11% $2,872 $3,083 $329 $413 3583 S. Stafford 76 50 26.39 basket 2006 2080 75 67 11% $2,872 $3,083 $329 $4115 4256 S. 35th 76 50 26.39 running 2006 2080 75 67 11% $2,872 $3,083 $329 $4115 4262-64 S. 35th 118 63 51.63 running 2006 2080 75 67 11% $3,642 $4,598 $490 $616 4130 S. 36th 76 50 26.39 basket 2006 2080 75 67 11% $2,872 $3,083 $329 $416 4134 S. 36th 76 50 26.39 basket 2006 2080 75 67 11% $2,872 $3,083 $329 $417 4200-02 S. 36th 118 63 51.63 basket 2006 2080 75 67 11% $3,642 $4,598 $490 $617 4206-08 S. 36th 118 63 51.63 basket 2006 2080 75 67 11% $3,642 $4,598 $490 $618 3615-17 S. Taylor 118 63 51.63 basket 2006 2080 75 67 11% $3,642 $4,598 $490 $618 3619-21 S. Taylor 118 63 51.63 basket 2006 2080 75 67 11% $3,642 $4,598 $490 $611 3523 A/B S. Stafford 118 63 51.63 running 2016 73 3 96% $3,642 $4,598 $4,409 $635 4104-06 S 36th 118 63 51.63 basket 2016 73 3 96% $3,642 $4,598 $4,409 $636 4146-48 S. 36th 118 63 51.63 running 2016 73 3 96% $3,642 $4,598 $4,409 $639 3545 S. Utah 76 50 26.39 basket 2016 73 3 96% $2,872 $3,083 $2,957 $4211 4227-29 S. 36th 118 63 51.63 basket 2016 73 3 96% $3,642 $4,598 $4,409 $6316 4314-16 S. 35th 118 63 51.63 running 2016 73 3 96% $3,642 $4,598 $4,409 $6313 3538-40 S. Stafford 118 63 51.63 running 2016 73 3 96% $3,642 $4,598 $4,409 $633 3569 A/B S. Stafford 118 63 51.63 basket 2016 73 3 96% $3,642 $4,598 $4,409 $636 4144 S. 36th 76 50 26.39 basket 2016 73 3 96% $2,872 $3,083 $2,957 $4210 4311 S. 36th 67 50 23.26 basket 2016 73 3 96% $2,521 $2,896 $2,777 $4015 4236-38 S. 35th 110 63 48.13 running 2016 73 3 96% $3,432 $4,388 $4,207 $601 3525 A/B S. Stafford 118 63 51.63 running 2018 75 5 93% $3,642 $4,598 $4,291 $612 3547 A/B S. Stafford 118 63 51.63 basket 2018 75 5 93% $3,642 $4,598 $4,291 $615 4122-24 S. 36th 118 63 51.63 running 2018 75 5 93% $3,642 $4,598 $4,291 $615 4126-28 S. 36th 118 63 51.63 running 2018 75 5 93% $3,642 $4,598 $4,291 $616 4132 S. 36th 76 63 33.25 basket 2018 75 5 93% $2,872 $3,495 $3,262 $479 3547 S. Utah 76 50 26.39 basket 2018 75 5 93% $2,872 $3,083 $2,878 $4111 3588-90 S. Stafford 118 63 51.63 running 2018 75 5 93% $3,642 $4,598 $4,291 $6111 4231-33 S. 36th 118 63 51.63 basket 2018 75 5 93% $3,642 $4,598 $4,291 $6112 3562 S. Stafford 76 50 26.39 basket 2018 75 5 93% $2,872 $3,083 $2,878 $4112 3582-84 S. Stafford 118 63 51.63 basket 2018 75 5 93% $3,642 $4,598 $4,291 $6115 4258-60 S. 35th 118 63 51.63 running 2018 75 5 93% $3,642 $4,598 $4,291 $6113 3542-44 S. Stafford 118 63 51.63 running 2018 75 5 93% $3,642 $4,598 $4,291 $615 4112-14 S. 36th 118 63 51.63 running 2018 75 5 93% $3,642 $4,598 $4,291 $61

Dimensions(inches)

Unit Cost for Replacement of Masonry Stoops = 60.00$

Front Stoops (renovations originally planned for 2006-2010, but later suspended)

Appendix A10 - Supporting Estimate for Masonry Stoop Repairs (5.2.a)


1 of 22/27/2014


/sf +$1,500 per stoop for mobilization, temp protections, etc.

Court Address Area (SF)Bond

Pattern

Year Last Replaced


Useful Life


(CY)

Percent Depreciated


(2006)




Dimensions(inches)

Unit Cost for Replacement of Masonry Stoops = 60.00$

Front Stoops (renovations originally planned for 2006-2010, but later suspended)

Appendix A10 - Supporting Estimate for Masonry Stoop Repairs (5.2.a)

1 3521 S. Stafford 76 50 26.39 running 2020 77 7 91% $2,872 $3,083 $2,803 $404 4103 S. 36th 76 50 26.39 basket 2020 77 7 91% $2,872 $3,083 $2,803 $4010 4319-21 S. 36th 118 63 51.63 basket 2020 77 7 91% $3,642 $4,598 $4,180 $6011 3592-94 S. Stafford 118 63 51.63 running 2020 77 7 91% $3,642 $4,598 $4,180 $6014 4202 S. 35th 67 50 23.26 basket 2020 77 7 91% $2,521 $2,896 $2,633 $3815 4242-44 S. 35th 110 63 48.13 running 2020 77 7 91% $3,432 $4,388 $3,989 $5716 4302 S. 35th 76 50 26.39 basket 2020 77 7 91% $2,872 $3,083 $2,803 $401 3517 A/B S. Stafford 118 63 51.63 basket 2020 77 7 91% $3,642 $4,598 $4,180 $603 3577 A/B S. Stafford 118 63 51.63 running 2020 77 7 91% $3,642 $4,598 $4,180 $604 4121 S. 36th 76 50 26.39 basket 2020 77 7 91% $2,872 $3,083 $2,803 $4010 4301 S. 36th 67 50 23.26 running 2022 79 9 89% $2,521 $2,896 $2,566 $3710 4313-15 S. 36th 118 63 51.63 basket 2022 79 9 89% $3,642 $4,598 $4,074 $5811 4235-37 S. 36th 118 63 51.63 basket 2022 79 9 89% $3,642 $4,598 $4,074 $5812 3558 S. Stafford 76 50 26.39 basket 2022 79 9 89% $2,872 $3,083 $2,732 $3915 4230-32 S. 35th 118 63 51.63 basket 2022 79 9 89% $3,642 $4,598 $4,074 $5815 4240 S. 35th 118 63 51.63 running 2022 79 9 89% $3,642 $4,598 $4,074 $5815 4254 S. 35th 76 50 26.39 basket 2022 79 9 89% $2,872 $3,083 $2,732 $394 4113 S. 36th 76 50 26.39 running 2022 79 9 89% $2,872 $3,083 $2,732 $394 4115-17 S. 36th 118 63 51.63 running 2022 79 9 89% $3,642 $4,598 $4,074 $58

65 20 70% $185,885 $224,672 $166,728 $2,975

Total number of stoops in Fairlington Glen 181Number of stoops in renovation group: 56Remaining stoops 125

Renovation cost per stoop in renovation group (CY): $4,012

Court AddressDimens

ionBond

Pattern

Year Last Replaced


Useful Life


(CY)

Percent Depreciated




125 remaining stoops 2033 90 20 78% - $501,499 $390,055 $5,572

Totals for all 181 stoops 82 20 75% - $726,171 $556,783 $8,548


2 of 22/27/2014


Repair Cost per Repair Cycle = 250,000$ Frequency of Repairs = 8 yearsRepair Extent Inflator 10%

1st Repair Cycle 2014 250,000$ 2nd Repair Cycle 2022 275,000$ 3rd Repair Cycle 2030 302,500$ 4th Repair Cycle 2038 332,750$

Tuckpointing & Miscellaneous Periodic Masonry/Stone Veneer Repair

Appendix A11 - Supporting Estimate for Masonry Maintenance/Repointing (5.2.b)


1 of 12/27/2014


Court Address #Doors#Windows/ Sidelites #Mailboxes

1 3501 S. Stafford 1 2 12 3537 S. Stafford 1 2 12 3545 S. Stafford 1 2 12 3551 S. Stafford 1 2 13 3563 S. Stafford 1 2 13 3571 S. Stafford 1 2 13 3581 S. Stafford 1 2 14 4123 S. 36th Street 1 2 15 4118 S. 36th Street 1 2 17 4204 S. 36th Street 1 2 17 4210 S. 36th Street 1 2 17 4212 S. 36th Street 1 2 18 3611 S. Taylor Street 1 2 19 3529 S. Utah Street 1 2 110 4317 S. 36th Street 1 2 112 3570 S. Stafford Street 1 2 113 3520 S. Stafford Street 1 2 113 3536 S. Stafford Street 1 2 114 4216 S. 35th Street 1 2 114 4218 S. 35th Street 1 2 115 4240 S. 35th Street 1 2 115 4270 S. 35th Street 1 2 116 4300 S. 35th Street 1 2 1

Total Quantity 23 46 23

Unit Cost for Replacement 1,500.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ Total Costs 34,500.00$ 23,000.00$ 11,500.00$

Appendix A12 - Supporting Estimate for B-Unit Elements (6.1)



Appendix BFairlington Glen Condominium


Multi-Year Expenditure Table

36

Section Component 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034

1.0 Hardscape1.1 Asphalt Pavement

1.1.a Replace asphalt in parking lots $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $958,650 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01.1.b Maintain asphalt in parking lots annually $8,985 $8,265 $0 $10,245 $8,265 $0 $10,245 $8,265 $0 $9,000 $0 $0 $18,510 $0 $0 $18,510 $0 $0 $18,510 $0 $0

1.2 Concrete1.2.a Sidewalk Replacement (see "Sidewalks" tab) $79,035 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,035 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,035 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,035 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,0351.2.b Curb and Gutter Replacement (see "Curb/Gutter" tab) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,576 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

2.0 Utilities2.1 Sanitary Sewers (see "Sewers" Tab)

2.1.a Relining - Terra Cotta (outside building footprint) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02.1.b Relining/Replacement - Cast Iron (inside footprint) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,895 $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,160 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,435 $0 $02.1.c Sewer cleanouts $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02.1.d Sewer manholes $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $55,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

2.2 Storm Drainage (see "Storm" Tab)2.2.a Storm drain piping $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,160 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $900 $0 $0 $1,500 $0 $0 $02.2.b Storm drainage structures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,078 $1,500 $0 $3,113 $0 $3,200 $0

3.0 Miscellaneous Site Features3.1 Signage

3.1.a Replace Site Signage $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,748 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03.3 Fencing (see "Fencing" Tab for lineal footage of fencing with unit cost information)

3.3.a Replace Treated Wood Patio Fencing $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $404,064 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03.3.b Replace Split-Rail Fence at Ct. 4 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03.3.c Perimeter Fence $0 $66,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03.3.d Replace Pool Perimeter Fence $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,000 $03.3.e Replace Pool Tennis Court Fence $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03.3.f Replace Triple Tennis Court Fence $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03.3.g Replace Paddle Ball Fence $0 $7,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03.3.h Replace Short Basketball Court Fence $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,320 $0

3.3 Handrails (see "Fencing" Tab for takeoff)3.3.a Replace Cast Iron Handrails $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

3.4 Exterior Lighting (see "Outdoor Lighting" tab)3.4.a Replace Carriage Light Poles and Heads $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03.4.b ReFeed Carriage Light Pole Circuits $0 $0 $0 $0 $101,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03.4.c Replace Pole Lights at Swimming Pool $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03.4.d Replace Ceiling Fixtures at Entry to B-Units $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,450 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Appendix B - Multi-year Reserve Expenditures Table




Section Component 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034

Appendix B - Multi-year Reserve Expenditures Table

4.0 Recreational Features4.1 Swimming Pool (see "Swimming Pool" Tab)

4.1.a Whitecoat Pools $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,330 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,330 $0 $0 $0 $0 $04.1.b Replace Coping Stones & Tiles $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,525 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $04.1.c.1 Pool Deck Repairs $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,080 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,080 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,080 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $04.1.c.2 Pool Deck Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $97,150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $04.1.c.3 Pool Structure Repair (Plumbing + Concrete) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $04.1.d Replace Pool Covers $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,951 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,951 $0 $0 $04.1.e Replace Pool Pumps, Filters and Drains $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,695 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,695 $0 $0 $0 $0 $04.1.f Replace Lifeguard Chairs $0 $0 $0 $7,208 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,208 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $04.1.g Replace Large Canvas Awning At Pool $0 $3,229 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,229 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $04.1.h Replace Small Canvas Awning At Pool $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,390 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,390 $0 $0 $0 $0

4.2 Courts4.2.a Reapply Color Coat At Pool Tennis Court $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $04.2.b Renovate/Reconstruct Pool Tennis Court $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $43,634 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $04.2.c Reapply Color Coat At Triple Tennis Courts $0 $0 $0 $20,769 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,769 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,769 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,769 $0 $04.2.d Renovate/Reconstruct Triple Tennis Courts $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $101,992 $0 $0 $04.2.e Reapply Color Coat at Basketball Court $0 $0 $0 $4,897 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,897 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,897 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,897 $0 $04.2.f Renovate/Reconstuct Basketball Court $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,389 $0 $0

4.3 Tot Lot4.3.a Replace Tot Lot $0 $0 $0 $40,820 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,820 $0 $0 $0 $0 $04.3.b Replace Tot Lot table and seats $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,166 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,166 $0 $0 $0

5.0 Building Exteriors5.1 Roofs (see "Roofing" tab)

5.1.a Roofing and Flashings (see supporting estimate) $247,569 $220,606 $200,996 $259,824 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $05.2 Façade

5.2.a Masonry Stoops (see "Masonry" Tab) $0 $0 $45,633 $0 $55,637 $0 $38,007 $0 $35,133 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $501,499 $05.2.b Masonry Veneer Maintenance/Repointing $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $302,500 $0 $0 $0 $05.2.c Replace Shutters $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $76,164 $0 $0 $0 $05.2.d Replace B-Unit Doors (see "B-Units" Tab) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $05.2.e Replace B-Unit Common Windows (see "B-Units" Tab) $23,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

6.0 Building Interiors & Services6.1 Interiors

6.1.a Replace B-Unit Interior Finishes $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,571 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,571 $0 $0 $0 $06.1.b Replace B-Unit Mailboxes (see "B-Units" Tab) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06.1.c Refurbish Maintenance Office & Bathhouses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

6.2 Tools/Equipment6.2.a Replace B-unit Carpet Cleaner $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,444 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,444 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06.2.b Replace Tractor + Accessories $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06.2.c Replace Snow Blower $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500 $0 $0 $06.2.d Replace Pipe Camera $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0

6.3 Services6.3.a Replacement Reserve Study $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0

TOTAL PER YEAR $608,588 $310,900 $263,129 $343,763 $294,312 $171,146 $51,642 $20,765 $802,506 $1,307,256 $79,035 $22,229 $72,144 $91,478 $37,558 $290,040 $440,625 $137,722 $107,000 $538,019 $79,0352014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034




Appendix CFairlington Glen Condominium


Plat Drawings

37

COURT 9

COURT 1

COURT 2

COURT 3

COURT 4

COURT 5

COURT 6

COURT 7

COURT 8

COURT 11

COURT 10

COURT 16

COURT 15

COURT 13

COURT 14

COURT 12

So

ut h

St

af

fo

rd

St

re

et

So

ut

h

36

th

S

tr

ee

t

So

ut h

T a yl o

r S t r e e t

So

ut

h U

ta

h

St

re

et

S o u t h 3 5 t h S t r e e t

Ki n

g S

t r ee

t

No

rt

h Q

ua

ke

r L

an

e

SWINGS

TOT LOT(2017)

SITE PLANSCALE: 1/64" = 1'-0"

COURT 1

3501-A1/B1

3507A 3507B 3509A 3509B 35113513A 3513B

3501-A2/B23503

3515A3515B

3517A3517B

3519A3519B

3529B3529A

3527B3527A

3525B3525A

3523B3523A

3521

3535A 3535B 3537 A1/B13537 A2/B2

3534

3536 A2/B2

3536 A1/B1

3538

35403542

3544

3522

3518 3516 3514 3512

42104208

42064204

4202

3500

3520 A1/B1 3520 A2/B2

4218 A2/B2

4218 A1/B1

4216 A2/B2

4216 A1/B1

3532

3530

3528

3526

3524

COURT 13

COURT 14

2010VRMT GRN

3,200sf(2110)

ORIGINALVRMT GRN4,800sf(2043)

2006VRMT GRN

6,000sf(2106)

ORIGINALVRMT GRN

3,500sf(2043)

2005VRMT GRN

4,000sf(2105)

2013VRMT GRN

7,000sf(2113)

ORIGINAL (BACK)BANGOR2,800sf(2016)

ORIGINAL (FRONT)BANGOR3,500sf(2016)

1995 (FRONT)VRMT GREEN

2,800sf(2095)

1998 (REAR)VRMT GRN

3,500sf(2098)

2010VRMT GREEN

4,000sf(2110)

ORIGINAL (FRONT)BANGOR1,500 sf(2014)2010

VRMT GREEN4,000sf(2110)

1996VRMT GREEN

1,000sf(2096)

2004VRMT GREEN

1,500sf(2104)

ARLINGTON COUNTY SAN SEWER LATERAL

TRIPLE TENNIS COURTSRECONSTRUCTED &

RESURFACED IN 2011 (2031)

TRIPLE TENNIS COURTFENCING - REPLACED IN

2011 (2046)

12" TERRA COTTASTORM LATERAL(RELINE - 20??)

MASONRY STOOPREBUILT - 2006


FRENCH DRAIN(2011)

SERIES OF PE CATCHBASINS AND PIPINGINSTALLED 2011/ 12 INTHIS AREA - EXACTCONFIGURATIONUNKNOWN

LINE COULD NOT BERELINED DUE TOOBSTRUCTION FROM OLDSTEAM PLANT DUCTBANK

12" ARLINGTON COUNTY STORM SEWER LATERAL

MAS. STOOP -PHASE I(2016)

MAS. STOOP - PHASE I(2016)

MAS. STOOP -PHASE II

(2018)

MAS. STOOP - PHASE II(2018)


MAS. STOOP - PHASE III(2020)

MAS. STOOP -PHASE III(2020)

SUMP PUMP DISCHARGECONNECTED TO DRAINLINEBELOW GRADE EXTENDINGTO DISCHARGE POINTALONG CURB AND GUTTERAT QUAKER LANE (2011)

LEGEND

GENERALPROPERTY LINE

BACKYARD FENCELINE

BUILDING OUTLINE

ADDRESS

SIDEWALK

CURB AND GUTTER

EXISTING TREE (NOTE: NOTALL TREES SHOWN)

SANITARY SEWERARLINGTON COUNTY MAIN

CAST IRON LATERAL

TERRA COTTA LATERAL

PVC LATERAL

SANITARY MANHOLE

EXTERIOR CLEANOUT

INTERIOR CLEANOUT

STORM SEWERARLINGTON COUNTY MAIN

FG STORM LATERAL(TYPE, AGE, REPL DATE)

FG STORM PIPING -CORRUGATED POLYETHYLEN

STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN - CURB INLET - GRADE INLET - YARD INLET - POLYETHYLENE

STORM WATER MANHOLE

ROOFINGEXTENT OF ROOF SECTION

AGE OF ROOFTYPE OF SLATE ROOFINGAPPROX. SQUARE FOOTAGEANTICIPATED REPL DATE

ORIGINAL ROOFING - BANGOR SLATE

- BUCKINGHAM SLATE

- VERMONT SLATE

NEW ROOFING - VERMONT GREEN SLATE

FENCINGWOODEN PRIVACY FENCE

WOODEN SPLIT RAIL FENCE

CHAIN LINK FENCING

ALUMINUM FENCING

2010VRMT GREEN

4,000sf(2110)

4310

COURTS 1, 13 & 14SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"

3535A 3535B 3537 A1/B13537 A2/B2

3539A 3539B3541

3543A3543B

3545 A1/B13545 A2/B2

3547A3547B

3555

3553B

3553A

3551 A1/B1

3551 A1/B1

3549B

3549A

35613563 A1/B1

3563 A2/B23565A

3565B3567

3569A3569B

3571 A1/B13571 A2/B2

3573A3573B

3579

3577B

3577A

3575B

3575A

3585

3583

3581 A2/B2

3581 A1/B1

41394137

35623560

35583556

35543552

35503548

35983596

35943592

35903588

3576

3578

3580

3582

3584

3564

3566

3568

3570

A2/

B2

3570

A1/

B135

7235

74

COURT 2

COURT 3

COURT 12

So

ut h

St

af

fo

rd

St

re

et

2013VRMT GRN

7,000sf(2113)

ORIGINALVRMT GRN

5,500sf(2043)

2013VRMT GRN

7,600sf(2113)

1980SUPERSLATE

3,200sf(2014)

2007VRMT GRN

3,000sf(2117)

ORIGINALVRMT GRN

4,800sf(2043)

2002 (BACK)VRMT GRN

1,900sf(2102)

2004VRMT GRN

4,600sf(2104)

ORIGINALBANGOR1,900sf(2014)

ORIGINALVERMONT

4,400sf(2034)

ORIGINALBUCKINGHAM

7,000sf(2034)



3,500sf(2097)


1998 (REAR)VRMT GRN

1,900sf(2098)

(2098)

ARLINGTON COUNTY SAN SEWER LATERAL

ARLINGTON COUNTY SAN SEWER MAIN

ORIGINAL 4"Ø CI INTERIORCAST IRON SANITARYSEWER LINE REPLACEDWITH 4"Ø PVC LINE IN JUNE2008.

INTERIOR CASTIRON LATERALRELINED 2008

INTERIOR CASTIRON SEWERLATERAL ALSORELINED IN 2007


COPING STONE &TILE - 1974 (2020)

POOL FENCING - 2003

POOL DECKREPAIR - 2009 (2013)REPLACEMENT (2029)

6" PVC STORMLATERAL - 2007(2057)




ORIGINAL CATCH BASINRELOCATED SOUTHWEST BYAC (2010?): IN CONUNCTION,FG LATERAL RELOCATED TODISCHARGE INTO NEW BASIN

12" ARLINGTON COUNTY STORM SEWER LATERAL

MAS. STOOP -PHASE I(2016)

MAS. STOOP -PHASE II

(2018)





MAS. STOOP -PHASE III

(2020)

MAS. STOOP -PHASE IV

(2022)

LEGEND


BACKYARD FENCELINE

BUILDING OUTLINE

ADDRESS

SIDEWALK

CURB AND GUTTER



CAST IRON LATERAL

TERRA COTTA LATERAL

PVC LATERAL

SANITARY MANHOLE

EXTERIOR CLEANOUT

INTERIOR CLEANOUT





STORM WATER MANHOLE




- BUCKINGHAM SLATE

- VERMONT SLATE




CHAIN LINK FENCING

ALUMINUM FENCING

2010VRMT GREEN

4,000sf(2110)

4310

COURTS 2, 3, 11(PART.) & 12SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"

41394137

41354133

41314129

41274125

4123 A1/B14123 A2/B2

41214119

4117

41154113

4111

4109

4107

41054103

4101

4100

410241

04

4106

4108

411041

12

4114

4116

4118

A1/B1

4118

A2/B2

4128

4126

4124

4122

4136

4134

4132

4130

COURT 4

COURT 5

COURT 6

So

ut

h

36

th

S

tr

ee

t

No

rt

h Q

ua

ke

VRMT GRN1,900sf(2102)

ORIGINALVERMONT

6,000sf(2034)

2011 (BACK)VRMT GRN

1,400sf(2111)

ORIGINALVERMONT

3,700sf(2034)

1996 (FRONT)VRMT GRN

1,800sf(2096)

1996 (BACK)VRMT GRN

1,000sf(2096)

2012VRMT GRN

3,100sf(2112)

ORIGINALBUCKINGHAM

3,700sf(2034)

2012VRMT GRN

4,400sf(2112)

2012VRMT GRN

4,400sf(2112)

2003VRMT GREEN

4,400sf(2103)

ORIGINALVERMONT

6,000sf(2034)


VINYL SPLIT RAILFENCING - 2010(2040)



MAS. STOOP -PHASE II(2018)





(2020)


(2022)

LEGEND


BACKYARD FENCELINE

BUILDING OUTLINE

ADDRESS

SIDEWALK

CURB AND GUTTER



CAST IRON LATERAL

TERRA COTTA LATERAL

PVC LATERAL

SANITARY MANHOLE

EXTERIOR CLEANOUT

INTERIOR CLEANOUT





STORM WATER MANHOLE




- BUCKINGHAM SLATE

- VERMONT SLATE




CHAIN LINK FENCING

ALUMINUM FENCING

2010VRMT GREEN

4,000sf(2110)

4310

COURTS 4 & 5SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"

4144

4142

4140

4138

4136

4134

4132

4130

4156

4154

4152

4150

4148

4146

4158

4160

4162

4164

4166

4168

4170

4172

4174

4176

4208

4206

4202

4200

4204 A2/B2

4204 A1/B1

3613

3611 A2/B2

3611 A1/B1

4210

A1/B1

4210

A2/B2

4212

A1/B1

4212

A2/B2

3609

3607

3605

3603

3601

3625

3623

3621

3619

3617

3615

4209 4207

4227

COURT 6

COURT 7

COURT 8

COURT 11So

ut h

T a yl o

Ki n

g S

t r ee

t

ORIGINALVERMONT

6,000sf(2034)

ORIGINALVERMONT

3,600sf(2034)

ORIGINALVERMONT

4,500sf(2034)

ORIGINALVERMONT

3,000sf(2034)

2003 (BACK)VRMT GREEN

3,350sf(2103)


3,350sf(2111)


2,500sf(2111)

1998 (REAR)VRMT GRN

2,500sf(2098)


2,000sf(2100)


2003VRMT GREEN

3,200sf(2103)

2006VRMT GREEN

3,600sf(2106)

PADDLE BALL COURT(20??)

PADDLEBALL COURTFENCING - (2020)





SAN SEW 6-3 25 LFTC RELINED-2009 / (2059)




LEGEND


BACKYARD FENCELINE

BUILDING OUTLINE

ADDRESS

SIDEWALK

CURB AND GUTTER



CAST IRON LATERAL

TERRA COTTA LATERAL

PVC LATERAL

SANITARY MANHOLE

EXTERIOR CLEANOUT

INTERIOR CLEANOUT





STORM WATER MANHOLE




- BUCKINGHAM SLATE

- VERMONT SLATE




CHAIN LINK FENCING

ALUMINUM FENCING

2010VRMT GREEN

4,000sf(2110)

4310

COURTS 6, 7 & 8SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"

COURT 9

42644262

42604258

42544252

4250 4248

4256

43434341

43394337

43354333 4331

4329

35493547

3545

3543

3541

35393537

3535

43204318 4316

4314

4312

4310

4304

4302

4300 A2/B2

4300 A1/B1

4282

4280

4278

4276

4274

4272

4270

A2/

B2

4270

A1/

B142

6842

66

42444242

4240 A2/B2

4240 A1/B14238

4236

42344232

42304228

35333531

3529-A2/B2

3529-A1/B13527

3525

4226

4284

4246

COURT 16

COURT 15

So

ut

h U

ta

h

St

re

et

S o u t h 3 5 t h S t r e e t

3523

3521

3519

3517

35133515

SWINGS

ORIGINALBUCKINGHAM

4,400sf(2043)



2001 (REAR)VRMT GRN

3,900sf(2101)


ORIGINALVERMONT

2,200sf(2034)

1998 (REAR)VRMT GRN

2,700sf(2098)



2007 (REAR)VRMT GRN

1,800sf(2107)

2007VRMT GREEN

3,600sf(2107)

1999VRMT GREEN

4,550sf(2099)

ORIGINALVERMONT

2,400sf(2034)

ORIGINALVERMONT

4,000sf(2034)

ORIGINALVERMONT

4,400sf(2034)



INTERIOR CASTIRON SEWER

LATERAL ALSORELINED IN 2008

TOT LOT(2017)

BASKETBALL COURT

12" TERRA COTTASTORM LATERAL

(RELINE - 20??)


(RELINE - 2043)


(RELINE - 2043)

6" PVC STORMLATERAL - 2008(2058)

3" & 4" PVC STORMLATERALS, TYP. -

2008 (2038)

ARLI

NGTO

N CO

UNTY

SAN

SEW

ER M

AIN

1999 (REAR)VRMT GRN

2,900sf(2099)











(2020)

MAS. STOOP -PHASE III(2020)


(2022)


(2022)

MAS. STOOP - PHASE IV(2022)

LEGEND


BACKYARD FENCELINE

BUILDING OUTLINE

ADDRESS

SIDEWALK

CURB AND GUTTER



CAST IRON LATERAL

TERRA COTTA LATERAL

PVC LATERAL

SANITARY MANHOLE

EXTERIOR CLEANOUT

INTERIOR CLEANOUT





STORM WATER MANHOLE




- BUCKINGHAM SLATE

- VERMONT SLATE




CHAIN LINK FENCING

ALUMINUM FENCING

2010VRMT GREEN

4,000sf(2110)

4310

COURTS 9, 15 & 16SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"

4210

A2/B2

4212

A1/B1

4212

A2/B2

3609

3607

3605

3603

3601

42234221

4219 4217

4209 4207 4205 4203 4201

4215

43434341

43394337

43354333 4331

43294327

43254323

43014303

43054307

4309

4237

4235

4233

4231

4229

4227

35983596

3594

43114313

4315

4317 A2/B2

4317 A1/B14319

4321

COURT 8

COURT 11

COURT 10

t r e e t

SWINGS


2,500sf(2111)

1998 (REAR)VRMT GRN

2,500sf(2098)


2,000sf(2100)





4,300sf(2100)

2003 (REAR)VRMT GREEN

2,000sf(2103)

ORIGINALVERMONT

5,600sf(2034)

POOL HOUSE

2009VRMT GREEN3,000sf(2109)

ORIGINALVERMONT

4,000sf(2034)

ORIGINALVERMONT

3,500sf(2034)

ORIGINALVERMONT

5,200sf(2034)


2007 (REAR)VRMT GRN

1,800sf(2107)

SINGLE TENNIS COURTRECONSTRUCTED &

RESURFACED IN 2011(2031)

BASKETBALL COURTRECONSTRUCTED &

SINGLE TENNIS COURTFENCING - (2028)

RESURFACED IN 2012(2027)

SWIMMING POOL - 1974

WHITECOAT -2009 (2019)(RECONST. 2034)

COPING STONE &TILE - 1974 (2020)

POOL FENCING - 2003(2033)

POOL DECKREPAIR - 2009 (2013)REPLACEMENT (2029)

BASKETBALL COURTFENCING - 2003 (2033)

6" PVC STORMLATERAL - 2011

(2061)


(RELINE - 20??)


ELECTRICALTRANSFORMER, TYP.

MASONRY STOOP





(2020)


(2020)


(2022)


(2022)


(2022)

LEGEND


BACKYARD FENCELINE

BUILDING OUTLINE

ADDRESS

SIDEWALK

CURB AND GUTTER



CAST IRON LATERAL

TERRA COTTA LATERAL

PVC LATERAL

SANITARY MANHOLE

EXTERIOR CLEANOUT

INTERIOR CLEANOUT





STORM WATER MANHOLE




- BUCKINGHAM SLATE

- VERMONT SLATE




CHAIN LINK FENCING

ALUMINUM FENCING

2010VRMT GREEN

4,000sf(2110)

4310

COURTS 10, 11(PARTIAL) & POOLSCALE: 1" = 20'-0"

2013 REPLACEMENT RESERVE STUDY - Fairlington · i. Roofing systems and associated flashings -...

Documents

Transcript of 2013 REPLACEMENT RESERVE STUDY - Fairlington · i. Roofing systems and associated flashings -...