2013 Nonprofit Engagement Data Management Study: A Graphic Report

1
1 FTE NONPROFIT ENGAGEMENT DATA MANAGEMENT STUDY: 2013 A GRAPHIC REPORT When it comes to tracking and using “engagement” data – the actions, interactions, and even conversations that relate to an organization’s work but don’t necessarily represent the transactional or financial data that have been traditionally used for measuring an organization’s health – today’s nonprofits are either tracking a lot, or hardly anything at all. And very few organizations are applying that data to make decisions about their programs or measure their strategic outcomes. What Kind of NON-FINANCIAL HOW DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION USE THIS PARTICIPATION OR ENGAGEMENT DATA ACTIVITY ARE YOU TRACKING ABOUT Email Open-Rates 88 % 86 % 86 % 72 % 69 % E-newsletter Subscription Activity on Organization Facebook Page Mention of Organization Twitter Profile Virality or Reach of Social Networks (i.e. "sharing" activity and reach of your fans/followers/networks) CONSTITUENTS? (i.e. "participation" or "engagement") Email Open-Rates 24 % Attendance at free events 27 % 23 % 18 % 17 % 17 % E-newsletter Subscription Activity on Organization Facebook Page Mention of Organization Twitter Profile Virality or Reach of Social Networks (i.e. "sharing" activity and reach of your fans/followers/networks) SOCIAL TRADITIONAL Email Open-Rates 20 % Attendance at free events 23 % 16 % 16 % 14 % 14 % 47 % 35 % 36 % 30 % 31 % 38 % E-newsletter Subscription Activity on Organization Facebook Page Mention of Organization Twitter Profile Virality or Reach of Social Networks (i.e. "sharing" activity and reach of your fans/followers/networks) SOCIAL TRADITIONAL SOCIAL TRADITIONAL To measure OUR ORGANIZATIONAL HEALTH To measure OUR STRATEGIC OUTCOMES APPROXIMATELY 2/3 OF RESPONDENTS Annual Fundraising Amount Frequency of Donations Giving Level (gift size) Constituent/Donor Retention Constituent/Donor Growth Event Participation SEE AT LEAST SOME CORRELATION BETWEEN ENGAGEMENT DATA AND OTHER KEY INDICATORS ENGAGEMENT/PARTICIPATION Have you seen any correlation between your data and other areas of your work for which you collect data? ENGAGEMENT/PARTICIPATION Do you plan to invest in any resources related to this kind of data collection, analysis, and use in the next 12 months? "PARTICIPATION" OR "ENGAGEMENT" DATA? What is your organization's biggest challenge in terms of collecting and using What does this mean for Brought to you by YOUR ORGANIZATION? Organizations tracking and analyzing this kind of engagement data are finding “some” to “a significant amount of” correlation between engagement level and other key organization areas such as: annual fundraising amount, constituent and donor retention, giving levels and frequency, and event participation. 1 in 10 organizations responded that they don't know how to determine correlation for engagement data and other key organizational areas such as: annual fundraising amount, constituent and donor retention, giving levels and frequency, and event participation. Yet despite acknowledging an inability to track and/or measure a correlation between engagement data and other key operational areas, organizations indicated a plan to invest in evaluation projects, staff and even new systems in the coming year to begin or improve their management of this type of constituent data. If your organization has room for improvement – or just needs to get started – when it comes to tracking and making use of the engagement data of your key constituents and donors, you’re not alone. Here are resources we think will help you take the right next steps to becoming more data-savvy: Book: Measuring the Networked Nonprofit, by Beth Kanter and Katie Delahaye Paine. With an emphasis on social networking data, this book provides concrete lessons for measuring what matters for your mission. http://www.amazon.com/Measuring-Networked-Nonprofit-Using-Change/dp/1118137604 Free Workbook: Getting Started With Data-Driven Decision-Making, from NTEN and produced by Idealware. Step-by-step worksheets to help you define your goals, determine what data you need, what data you can use, and how to put it together into a data-measurement plan for your organization. http://www.nten.org/research/2013-data-workbook-download Free Whitepaper: Donor Attrition: Stopping the Downward Spiral to build long-term meaningful relationships. http://success.avectra.com/donorretentionGAinfographic.html Coming soon! Stay tuned for a deeper look at how nonprofits are working with engagement data within their organizations in our Case Study companion report, which includes examples and insights from nonprofits tackling the evolving role of engagement data in their day-to-day work. Methodology: We distributed an online survey in March, 2013, to nonprofit and association professionals via email to NTEN and Avectra contacts, as well as through the social media channels of NTEN and Avectra. We received 244 responses. Which of the following is your organization's primary focus area -- as determined by your NTEE category on your IRS Form 990? Answer Options I. Arts, Culture, and Humanities II. Education III. Environment and Animals IV. Health V. Human Services VI. International, Foreign Affairs VII. Public, Societal Benefit VIII. Religion Related IX. Mutual/Membership Benefit X. Unknown/Unclassified XI. Other Response Percent 6.4% 14.8% 8.5% 13.6% 19.5% 3.4% 12.3% 3.0% 8.1% 3.4% 7.2% 35.1 % 29.8 % 9.6 % 9.2 % 25 % Plan to implement a data evaluation project Plan to add related job task(s) to current staff responsibilities Plan to hire a consultant/contract person for a data analysis project Plan to hire new staff with data analysis responsibilities Plan to invest in new systems to help collect/analyze this kind of data Less than 1 FTE staff person responsible for these tasks 0 Staff / no defined job responsibilities to this More than 3 FTE 1.5 - 3 FTE ENGAGEMENT/PARTICIPATION HAVE LESS THAN APPROXIMATELY 80% Do you have dedicated staff positions or defined job responsibilities related to collecting and analyzing this kind of data? Please consider in Full Time Equivalency (FTE). 29 % 49 % 12 % 8 % 2 % ENGAGEMENT PARTICIPATION DATA 1 FTE

description

We surveyed nonprofit professionals about the "engagement" data their organizations track, how they use it, what their key challenges are regarding working with this data for their missions, and what their plans are regarding engagement data projects in the next 12 months. This is our graphic report of the results. The study was conducted by NTEN (nten.org) in partnership with Avectra (Avectra.com) in the spring of 2013.

Transcript of 2013 Nonprofit Engagement Data Management Study: A Graphic Report

Page 1: 2013 Nonprofit Engagement Data Management Study: A Graphic Report

1 FTE

NONPROFIT ENGAGEMENT DATA MANAGEMENT STUDY:

2013

A GRAPHIC REPORT

When it comes to tracking and using “engagement” data – the actions, interactions, and even conversations that relate to an organization’s work but don’t necessarily represent the transactional or financial data that have been traditionally used for measuring an organization’s health –today’s nonprofits are either tracking a lot, or hardlyanything at all. And very feworganizations are applying thatdata to make decisions about their programs or measure their strategic outcomes.

What Kind ofNON-FINANCIAL

HOW DOES YOURORGANIZATIONUSE THIS PARTICIPATION OR ENGAGEMENT DATA

ACTIVITY ARE YOUTRACKING ABOUT

Email Open-Rates 88%

86%

86%

72%

69%

E-newsletter Subscription

Activity on Organization Facebook Page

Mention of Organization Twitter Profile

Virality or Reach of Social Networks (i.e. "sharing" activity and reach of your fans/followers/networks)

CONSTITUENTS?

(i.e. "participation" or "engagement")

Email Open-Rates 24%

Attendance at free events 27%

23%

18%

17%

17%

E-newsletter Subscription

Activity on Organization Facebook Page

Mention of Organization Twitter Profile

Virality or Reach of Social Networks (i.e. "sharing" activity and reach of your fans/followers/networks)

SO

CIA

LTR

AD

ITIO

NA

L

Email Open-Rates 20%

Attendance at free events 23%

16%

16%

14%

14%

47%

35%36%

30%31%

38%

E-newsletter Subscription

Activity on Organization Facebook Page

Mention of Organization Twitter Profile

Virality or Reach of Social Networks (i.e. "sharing" activity and reach of your fans/followers/networks)

SO

CIA

LTR

AD

ITIO

NA

L S

OC

IAL

TRA

DIT

ION

AL

To measureOUR ORGANIZATIONAL HEALTH

To measureOUR STRATEGIC OUTCOMES

APPROXIMATELY2/3 OF RESPONDENTS

Annual Fundraising AmountFrequency of DonationsGiving Level (gift size)Constituent/Donor RetentionConstituent/Donor GrowthEvent Participation

SEE AT LEAST SOME CORRELATION

BETWEENENGAGEMENT DATA AND OTHER KEY INDICATORS

ENGAGEMENT/PARTICIPATION Have you seen any correlation between your

data and other areas of your work for which you collect data?

ENGAGEMENT/PARTICIPATION Do you plan to invest in any resources related to this kind of

data collection, analysis, and use in the next 12 months?

"PARTICIPATION" OR "ENGAGEMENT" DATA?What is your organization's biggest challenge in terms of collecting and using

What does this mean for

Brought to you by

YOUR ORGANIZATION?

Organizations tracking and analyzingthis kind of engagement data are finding “some” to “a significant amount of” correlation between engagement level andother key organization areas such as: annual fundraising amount, constituent and donor retention, giving levels and frequency, and event participation.

1 in 10 organizations respondedthat they don't know how to determine correlation for engagement data and other key organizational areas such as: annual fundraising amount, constituent and donor retention, giving levels and frequency, and event participation.

Yet despite acknowledging an inability to track and/or measure a correlation between engagement data and other key operational areas, organizations indicated a plan to invest in evaluation projects, sta� and even new systems in the coming year to begin or improve their management of this type of constituent data.

If your organization has room for improvement – or just needs to get started – when it comes to tracking and making use of the engagement data of your key constituents and donors, you’re not alone. Here are resources we think will help you take the right next steps to becoming more data-savvy:

Book: Measuring the Networked Nonprofit, by Beth Kanter and Katie Delahaye Paine. With an emphasis on social networking data, this book provides concrete lessons for measuring what matters for your mission.http://www.amazon.com/Measuring-Networked-Nonprofit-Using-Change/dp/1118137604

Free Workbook: Getting Started With Data-Driven Decision-Making, from NTEN and produced by Idealware. Step-by-step worksheets to help you define your goals, determine what data you need, what data you can use, and how to put it together into a data-measurement plan for your organization.http://www.nten.org/research/2013-data-workbook-download

Free Whitepaper: Donor Attrition: Stopping the Downward Spiral to build long-term meaningful relationships. http://success.avectra.com/donorretentionGAinfographic.html

Coming soon! Stay tuned for a deeper look at how nonprofits are working with engagement data within their organizations in our Case Study companion report, which includes examples and insights from nonprofits tackling the evolving role of engagement data in their day-to-day work.

Methodology:We distributed an online survey in March, 2013, to nonprofit and association professionals via email to NTEN and Avectra contacts, as well as through the social media channels of NTEN and Avectra. We received 244 responses.

Which of the following is your organization's primary focus area -- as determined by your NTEE category on your IRS Form 990?Answer Options I. Arts, Culture, and HumanitiesII. Education III. Environment and Animals IV. Health V. Human Services VI. International, Foreign A�airs VII. Public, Societal Benefit VIII. Religion Related IX. Mutual/Membership Benefit X. Unknown/UnclassifiedXI. Other

Response Percent 6.4% 14.8% 8.5% 13.6% 19.5% 3.4%12.3%3.0% 8.1%3.4%7.2%

35.1%

29.8%

9.6%

9.2%

25%

Plan to implement a data evaluation project

Plan to add related job task(s) to current sta� responsibilities

Plan to hire a consultant/contract

person for a data analysis project

Plan to hire new sta� with data analysis

responsibilities

Plan to invest in new systems to help

collect/analyze this kind of data

Less than 1 FTE sta� person responsible for these tasks

0 Sta� / no defined job responsibilities to this

More than 3 FTE

1.5 - 3 FTE

ENGAGEMENT/PARTICIPATION

HAVE LESS THAN

APPROXIMATELY

80%

Do you have dedicated sta� positions or defined job responsibilities related to collecting and analyzing this kind of

data? Please consider in Full Time Equivalency (FTE).

29%

49%

12%

8%

2%

ENG

AG

EMEN

T PA

RTI

CIP

ATI

ON

DA

TA

1 FTE