2013-2014 Value-Added Estimates - Tulsa Public Schools · PDF fileinformation about how...

2013-2014 Value-Added Estimates

ii

Introduction to Value-Added/Achievement Scatter Plots

2013-2014 School Year In the past, the primary method of communicating a school's performance was student achievement data, a measurement of student knowledge at a single point in time and how well that performance compares against a standard. Achievement data alone, however, does not reflect the effectiveness of a school. Growth measures like value-added provide a more complete and accurate picture of a school's impact on student achievement over a school year. It isolates the effectiveness of the school and its teachers by combining achievement and growth information with other data sources to statistically control for factors outside of educators’ influence such as students' starting points, whether they are English language learners, their disability status, etc.

The District rolled out its first value-added reporting in the fall of 2011, including background information about how value-added works and detailed reports regarding each school’s value added estimates. This information is still available at the TPS Student Progress Portal. Value-added reporting is a project of the District's Teacher and Leader Effectiveness initiative made possible by community donor funds and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Both student achievement and value-added measures are important performance indicators. In the following pages, Tulsa Public Schools is reporting schools’ incoming achievement scores and their 2013-2014 value-added data on the same graph. This information is available with regard to elementary, middle and high schools, including (for the first time) results from Kindergarten through 3rd grade.

http://portal.battelleforkids.org/tulsa/home.html?sflang=en

iii

The scatter plots are not a “sorting” or “ranking” of schools. Identifying schools’ incoming achievement (students’ average starting point) and value added data in the same graphic allows for identification of effective practices and leveraging those practices across the district. Schools and teachers will use the information to create action plans, timelines and strategies to improve student achievement.

How to Read the Value–Added Scatter Plots

These scatter plots represent the value-added (students’ academic growth) and incoming achievement rates in Tulsa Public Schools. The subject and time span are listed below each scatter plot.

Along the x-axis (horizontal direction) is each school’s value-added estimate. Students to the

right of “District Average” are growing faster than what is typical for students with their individual characteristics. Students to the left of “District Average” are still gaining knowledge, but at a rate slower than what is typical. Along the y-axis (vertical direction) is each school’s incoming achievement. For grades K-3, incoming achievement is measured by the percentage of students who scored at the 50th percentile or better on their earliest MAP/MPG assessments. For grades 4 through 12, incoming achievement is measured by the percentage of students who scored in the proficient or advanced level on the prior test. The purpose of using incoming achievement with current year growth is to facilitate comparisons of schools based on similar student populations.

Bubble size represents the number of students included in the value-added estimate for each school site. The more students there are in calculation, the tighter the confidence intervals around the Value-Added estimate. Representative confidence interval sizes are displayed in the upper right of each scatter plot. Especially in the case of small schools, keep these 95% confidence intervals in mind when interpreting the scatter plots.

Outer ring color speci�es the school grade category. Black represents no valid school grade available.Inner color speci�es the VA score the school achieved.

State A-F ABCDF

Well below

average

Below average

Above average

Well above

average

VA category:Average

Examples:

A

Above average

DWell

below average

C Well

above average

B

Above average

School Grade:VA category:

Plot color key

Report Card Grade:

N/AWell

below average

N/A

1

Elementary Schools (2013‐2014)

(Grades K‐3 MPG/MAP results)

2

Key to Elementary Schools’ MPG/MAP Value‐Added/Achievement Scatter Plots

Number Name Number Name Number Name1 Academy Central 29 Grimes 50 Mcclure2 Anderson 30 Grissom 51 McKinley4 Bell 33 Hamilton 59 Mitchell5 Burroughs 34 Hawthorne 61 Owen6 Carnegie 35 Hoover 62 Park8 Celia Clinton 36 Jackson 63 Patrick Henry11 Chouteau 37 Jones 64 Peary13 Columbus 38 Kendall‐Whittier 65 Penn14 Cooper 39 Kerr 67 Remington15 Disney 40 Key 68 Robertson16 Dual Language 42 Lanier 69 Salk19 ECDC BUNCHE 43 Lee 70 Sequoyah20 ECDC PORTER 44 Lewis Clark 71 Skelly23 Eisenhower 45 Lighthouse 72 Springdale24 Eliot 46 Lindbergh 75 Traice25 Emerson 47 MacArthur 78 Twain26 Field 48 Marshall 81 Whitman27 Gilcrease 49 Mayo 84 Wright

85 Zarrow

3

Bubble size represents size of the schoolThese lines are 95% confidence intervalsfor representative school sizes

Grade K Reading Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

14

15

38

19

50 44

71

69

35

72

8

51

26

4

39

61

63

33

68

78

43

11

84

6

48

24

37

70

46

40

34

59

36

49

47

81

20

65

42

13

30

567

64

45

2

29

1

25

16

5421 District Average

2838

4858

6878

7


Grade K Math Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

14

15

71

19 38

4450

69

35

72

8

51

26

39

4

61

68

33

43

6378

11

24

84

637

70

48

46

40

34

59

36

49

47

20

42

30

65

13 567

64

45

81 2

29

1

25

16


2737

4757

6777

8


Grade 1 Reading Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

38

71

15

14

8

69 51

3950

46

7240

44

594

63

61

35

624

27

47

70

36

78

37

84

26

33

68

81

11

43

45

1

49

48

30

34

65

42

67

64

13

29

62

2

5


2838

4858

6878

9


Grade 1 Math Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

38 15

71

14

8

69

51

39

50

44

46

72

40

59

61

4

6

63

35

27

24

4770

36

37

84

78

26

33

68

11

81

43

45

1

30

49

48

42 34

67 64

1329

62

65

5

2


2131

4151

6171

81

10



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

38

71

15

14

35

44

70

39

72

69

8

6

63

51

59

40

461

50

47

33

24

37

27

68

7864

48

34

1

30

46

81

84

26

49

62

36

43

13

42

2

67

29

5

11


2838

4858

6878

88

11



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

38

71

1514

35

44

70

72

69

8

6

59

40

63

61

51

4

3350

4737

24

27

68

78

64 1

34

81

48

84

46

26

3049

62

36

43

13

42

2

67

29

11

5

65


2232

4252

6272

82

39

12



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

38

71 15

14

35

4

7244

8

24

33

70

6151

59

63

39

30

50

69

43

68

37

46

42

48

34

78

81

23

4727

40

49

45 26

64

29

25

11

67

84

2

1

13

5

36

65

62


2131

4151

6171

8191

13



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

38

71

15

1435

8

4427 70

24

61

33

4

5159

63

39

50

68

43

4637

81

42

48

34

47

23

7840

45

27

49

26

64

29

36

11

5

84

2

67

13

1

62

65


1424

3444

5464

7484

14

Elementary Schools (2013‐2014)

(grades 4‐6 and 4‐5, per school configuration)

15

Key to Elementary Schools’ Value‐Added/Achievement Scatter Plots

Number Name Number Name Number Name1 Academy Central 30 Grissom 51 McKinley2 Anderson 33 Hamilton 59 Mitchell4 Bell 34 Hawthorne 61 Owen5 Burroughs 35 Hoover 62 Park6 Carnegie 36 Jackson 63 Patrick Henry8 Celia Clinton 37 Jones 64 Peary11 Chouteau 38 Kendall‐Whittier 65 Penn13 Columbus 39 Kerr 67 Remington14 Cooper 40 Key 68 Robertson15 Disney 41 KIPP M.S. 69 Salk16 Dual Language 42 Lanier 70 Sequoyah19 ECDC BUNCHE 43 Lee 71 Skelly20 ECDC PORTER 44 Lewis Clark 72 Springdale23 Eisenhower 45 Lighthouse 75 Traice24 Eliot 46 Lindbergh 78 Twain25 Emerson 47 MacArthur 81 Whitman26 Field 48 Marshall 84 Wright27 Gilcrease 49 Mayo 85 Zarrow29 Grimes 50 Mcclure

16

hochst

Typewritten Text

17



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

38

1514

71

35

69

4

61 4451

8

63

59

24

39

43

72

33

23

68

2770

34

78

49

1337

40

45

46

84

5081

36

1

65

26

47

6425

42

48

11

62

2

30

5

29

6775


3141

5161

7181

91

20



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

3815

14

71

35

69

4

44

51

8

63

39

59

24

61

43

72

33

23

68

27

70

78

34

49

37

40

13

45

46

84

50

81

36

65

1

26

47

64

42

11

48

62

2

30

5

29

67


2232

4252

6272

82

21



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

3871

15

35

1439

70

63

43

51

24

6869

59

44

8

61

33

13

72

50

4

23

49

81

47

41

27

30

4011

78

45

1

65

46

48

84

62

42

37

5

34

67

25

64

29

2

36

26


1929

3949

5969

7989

22



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

38

71

15

35

14

39

70

63

43

51

24

68

69

5944

8

33

61

13

50

72

4

23

49

81 47

41

40

27

30

78

1165

1

48

45

62

84

42

46

37

5

3467

64

29

2

36


2333

4353

6373

8393

23


Grade 5 Science Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r E

xam

38

71

15

14

39

51

44

8

33

61

72

50

4

23

49

40

30

11

148

46

5

34

64

36

1 2 4 5District Average

2333

4353

6373

8393

24

Sixth Grade (2013‐2014)

25

Key to Sixth Grade Value‐Added/Achievement Scatter Plots

Number Name Number Name Number Name1 Academy Central 33 Hamilton 60 Monroe2 Anderson 34 Hawthorne 61 Owen4 Bell 35 Hoover 62 Park5 Burroughs 36 Jackson 64 Peary7 Carver M.S. 37 Jones 65 Penn8 Celia Clinton 38 Kendall‐Whittier 67 Remington11 Chouteau 39 Kerr 68 Robertson13 Columbus 40 Key 69 Salk14 Cooper 41 KIPP M.S. 70 Sequoyah15 Disney 44 Lewis Clark 71 Skelly22 Edison M.S. 46 Lindbergh 72 Springdale25 Emerson 47 MacArthur 73 Thoreau M.S.26 Field 48 Marshall 74 TLA27 Gilcrease 50 Mcclure 75 Traice29 Grimes 51 McKinley 77 Traice M.S.30 Grissom 59 Mitchell 78 Twain

81 Whitman

26


Grade 6 Overall Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

2273

7

15

3871

14

41

39

8

61

4

51

444647

69

70 59

60

40

27

3572

1362

33

5

37

67

26

1

2

68

50

11

25

81

34

36

78

29

48

64

65

30

77

74

75


1424

3444

5464

7484

27



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

22

73

7

15

38

7114

41

39

8

61

4

51

4446

47

69

70 59

60

27

40 35

7262

13

33

537

67

26

12

68

50

1125

81

3478

29

48

64

65

30


1424

3444

5464

7484

28



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

22 73

7

15

38

71

1441

398

614

51 4446

47

69

5970

60

40

27

35

72

13

62

5

37

6726

1

50

68

11

81

34

78

29

48

64

65

30


1020

3040

5060

7080

90

29

Middle School/Junior High (2013‐2014)

(grades 6‐8 and 7‐8, per school configuration)

30


M.S. Overall Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

Edison M.S.

Thoreau M.S.

Carver M.S.

East Central J.H.Hale J.H.Memorial J.H.

Will Rogers J.H.

Clinton M.S.

McLain J.H.

KIPP M.S.

Central J.H.

Monroe

MET J.H.

Traice M.S.

TLA

42 District Average

2333

4353

6373

8393

hochst

Typewritten Text

31

hochst

Typewritten Text

hochst

Typewritten Text

hochst

Typewritten Text

hochst

Typewritten Text

hochst

Typewritten Text

hochst

Typewritten Text

hochst

Typewritten Text

hochst

Typewritten Text

hochst

Typewritten Text


M.S. Reading Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

Edison M.S.

Thoreau M.S.

Carver M.S.

East Central J.H.

Hale J.H.

Will Rogers J.H.

Memorial J.H.

KIPP M.S.

Clinton M.S.

McLain J.H.Central J.H.

Monroe

MET J.H.

Traice M.S.

TLA

42 District Average

2333

4353

6373

8393

32


M.S. Math Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

Edison M.S.

Thoreau M.S.Carver M.S.

East Central J.H.Hale J.H. Memorial J.H.

Will Rogers J.H.Clinton M.S.

McLain J.H.

Central J.H.

KIPP M.S.

Monroe

MET J.H.

TLA


2636

4656

6676

86

33



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

Edison M.S.

East Central J.H.

Thoreau M.S.

Will Rogers J.H.

Hale J.H.

Carver M.S.

Memorial J.H. Clinton M.S.

Central J.H.

McLain J.H.

Monroe


3545

5565

7585

95

34



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

Edison M.S.

East Central J.H.

Thoreau M.S.

Hale J.H.

Will Rogers J.H.

Memorial J.H.

Carver M.S.

Clinton M.S.

McLain J.H.


3444

5464

7484

35



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

East Central J.H.

Hale J.H.

Edison M.S.

Carver M.S.

Memorial J.H.

Will Rogers J.H.

Thoreau M.S.

McLain J.H.

Clinton M.S.

Central J.H.

Monroe

Traice M.S.

42 District Average

2030

4050

6070

8090

36



Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

Hale J.H. East Central J.H.

Memorial J.H.

Carver M.S.

Will Rogers J.H.

Edison M.S.

Clinton M.S.

Thoreau M.S.

McLain J.H.MET J.H.

42 District Average

717

2737

4757

6777

87

37


Grade 8 Algebra I Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m Thoreau M.S.Carver M.S.

East Central J.H.

McLain J.H.

42 District Average

3646

5666

7686

96

38


Grade 8 Science Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

East Central J.H.

Hale J.H.

Edison M.S.

Carver M.S.

Memorial J.H.

Will Rogers J.H.

Thoreau M.S.

Traice M.S.


1727

3747

5767

7787

39

High Schools (2013‐2014)

40


H.S. Overall Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

WashingtonEdison

East Central

Hale

Will Rogers

Memorial

Central

Webster

McLain

Arts and Sciences

MET

TLA

Traice H.S.

2 4District Average

2232

4252

6272

82

41


H.S. English Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

Washington

East Central

Edison

Hale

Memorial

Will Rogers

CentralMcLain

Webster

Arts and Sciences

MET


4252

6272

8292

42


H.S. Math Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

Washington

Edison

East Central

Hale

Will Rogers

MemorialCentral

Webster

McLain

Arts and Sciences

MET


1020

3040

5060

7080

43


H.S. English II Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

Washington

Edison

East CentralMemorial

Will Rogers

Hale

Central

McLain

Webster


3343

5363

7383

93

44


H.S. English III Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

East Central

Hale

Will Rogers

Memorial

Edison

Washington

Central

Webster

McLain

42 District Average

5262

7282

92

45


H.S. Algebra I Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

East Central

Memorial

EdisonWashington

Hale

Will Rogers

Webster

McLain

CentralMET


717

2737

4757

67

46


H.S. Algebra II Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

Washington

Edison

East Central

Hale

Memorial

Webster

Arts and Sciences


4555

6575

85

47


H.S. Geometry Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m Washington

Edison

Hale

Will Rogers

East Central

Central

McLainMemorial

Webster

42 District Average

5060

7080

90

48


H.S. Biology I Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

Washington

Hale

Will Rogers

Memorial

East Central

Edison

Central

McLain

Webster

42 District Average

2535

4555

6575

49


H.S. U.S. History Value − Added (2013 − 14)

Stu

dent

s’ In

com

ing

Pro

ficie

ncy

Rat

e on

Prio

r Exa

m

Edison

East Central

Hale

Washington

Memorial

Will Rogers

CentralMcLain

Arts and Sciences

42 District Average

5767

7787

50

2013-2014 Value-Added Estimates - Tulsa Public Schools · PDF fileinformation about how...

Documents

Transcript of 2013-2014 Value-Added Estimates - Tulsa Public Schools · PDF fileinformation about how...