2012 workshop print
-
Upload
realisticreepham -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
35 -
download
0
Transcript of 2012 workshop print
![Page 1: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
your town ...prepared July 2012
![Page 2: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
your town
![Page 3: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Reepham could change massively over the next fifteen years.
At least 100 new houses – and perhaps as many as 250 – could be built as part of Broadland District Council’s Local Development Framework.
What do YOU think about this?
![Page 8: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Could Reepham’s roads, schools and other facilities cope?
How would town-edge estates affect the landscape?
What about the natural environment?
Would Reepham become less attractive to visitors?
Who would really benefit?
![Page 10: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Why so many new homes?
Ambitious 37,000 ‘target’ for Norwich area set by Greater Norwich Development Partnership
Government gave them a chance to reduce this target –but they declined!
District councils wish to finalise allocation of land for development by spring 2014
Under the government Homes Bonus scheme, district councils receive equivalent of six years’ Council Tax for each new home built!
Over-supply of new homes could affect property values.
![Page 14: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Why on greenfield sites?
Because there is not enough space within the settlement limit for 100+ more houses
Because it is more profitable for developers – lower costs compared to brownfield sites
Because it is easier for the local authority to manage a small number of large development sites
Because it is far more profitable for landowners to build on land than to farm it!
![Page 16: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Did you know ...
That outline planning permission has been grantedfor over 40 new homes on sites within the Reephamsettlement limit, in recent times. Should these be prioritised for building before greenfield?
That 95% of the levy collected from development in Reepham by Broadland District Council may be spent elsewhere … mostly on the Norwich Northern Distributor Road and the Long Stratton Bypass. This doesn’t leave much for our town … which will then have many more residents!
![Page 19: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
What about our community?
Will estates on the town edge ever really becomepart of Reepham … especially if people living therework and shop elsewhere … and if their young children cannot attend Reepham Primary School because it is full?
Would major development replace our independent food shops with supermarkets?
Would Reepham lose the special charm that visitors love so much?
![Page 22: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Let’s askfor REALISTIC
options forfuture
development
which keep our town alive and distinctive
![Page 23: 2012 workshop print](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051617/55a348091a28abc81f8b478a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Let’s askfor REALISTIC
options forfuture
development
which keep our town alive and distinctive… and protect its beautiful landscape setting.