2012  Summer  Bridge  Math  Program:    Enrollment  and  Course  Success  Rates  

Basic  Skills  Workgroup  February  7,  2013  

E.  Kuo  and  M.  Navi  FHDA  IR&P  

Overview  

•  Two  week  summer  program:  July  9-­‐19,  2012  – Emphasis  on  Math  – Goal:  provide  a  refresher  course  to  help  boost  math  placement  

– Coupled  with  Counseling  50  •  73  students  began  program  •  66  completed  program  

Overview  

•  66  enrolled  in  fall  2012  – 61  completed  Summer  Bridge  – 42  enrolled  in  a  math  course  (69%)  – NCBS  takers  (N=13)  have  been  omi]ed  from  success  rate  data  analysis  because  there  were  no  final  grades  •  8  took  NCBS  401A  •  5  took  NCBS  405  

– None  of  the  non  completers  enrolled  in  math  (N=5)  

 

Overview  Fall  2012  Enrollment  

•  Out  of  61  students,  roughly  half  of  student  enrollment  were  in  PSME  and  LA  divisions  (53%)  

•  35  students  enrolled  in  English  and  Math  (57%)  

1PS26%

1LA27%

1FA13%

1PE12%

1SS9%

1BH6%

1GU4%

1SE3%

2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Fall 2012 Enrollment by Division (N=185)

Fall  2012  Course  Success  

•  LA  had  88%  course  success  rate  •  PSME  had  50%  course  success  rate  

3  PHED  courses  were  excluded  due  to  missing  grades.  

6

17

8

43

16

24

5

11

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1BH 1FA 1GU 1LA 1PE 1PS 1SE 1SS

2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Fall 2012 Students Performance by Division (N=182)

Fall  2012  English  

•  45  students  out  of  the  61  students  who  completed  Summer  Bridge  enrolled  in  an  English  course  (74%)  

•  Majority  of  students  passed  their  English  course  (90%)  

 English  242A  is  corequisite  with  English  1S,  so  two  students  were  double  counted.  

Success90%

NonSuccess8%

Withdrew2%

2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program CohortFall 2012 English Course Success (N=47)

ENGL-F209.60%ENGL-F001A

13%

ENGL-F110.11%

ENGL-F001B8%

ENGL-F001S4%

ENGL-F242A4%

2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Fall 2012 Enrollment in English Department (N=47)

Fall  2012  Math  

•  Out  of  the  21  students  who  didn’t  pass  their  math  course,  the  highest  nonsuccess  rates  were  in:  Math  10:  38%          Math  105:  24%          Math  220:  24%  

Charts  include  all  students  who  finished  the  SB  program  and  enrolled  in  math.  

MATH-F010.26%

MATH-F220.29%

MATH-F105.21%

MATH-F235.12%

MATH-F108.5%

MATH-F217.5%

MATH-F048A2%

2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Fall 2012 Enrollment in Math Department (N=42)

Success50%

NonSuccess36%

Withdrew14%

2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program CohortFall 2012 Math Course Success (N=42)

Math  Course  Success  

•  Students  enrolled  in  Math  108,  217,  220  and  235  had  higher  success  rates,  where  over  half  of  students  passed  the  course.  

•  Over  half  of  the  students  who  were  not  successful  in  their  math  course  experienced  success  in  their  other  courses  (13  out  of  19  students).  

Math Course N % N % N % N %F010. 3 27% 4 36% 4 36% 11 100%F048A 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 1 100%F105. 4 44% 3 33% 2 22% 9 100%F108. 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%F217. 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%F220. 7 58% 5 42% 0 0% 12 100%F235. 3 60% 2 40% 0 0% 5 100%

NonSuccessSuccess Withdrew

2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Cohort (N=42)Math Course Success Rate

Total

Course  Success  by  Placement  

•  Half  the  students  were  successful  in  the  math  course,  regardless  of  whether  their  placement  level  increased.  

Students  with  no  pretest  data  were  excluded.  

4 10

4 11

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No level change or decrease 1 Level and more increase

2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program CohortMath Course Success Rate by

Math Placement Level Change (N=29)

Success NonSuccess

4 3 2

3

2

0

4 4 3

1

2

1

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

No level change or decrease

1 level increase

2 level increase

3 level increase

4 level increase

5 level increase

2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program CohortMath Course Success Rate by

Math Placement Level Change (N=29)

Success NonSuccess

NCBS  405  

•  5  Students  enrolled  in  NCBS  405  – 4  students  took  NCBS  405  and  F010  concurrently  with:    •  50%  Success  •  25%  Nonsuccess  •  25%  Withdrew  

– 1  student  didn’t  take  any  Math  course  

Overview  Winter  2013  Enrollment  

•  Compared  to  Fall  2012,  where  enrollment  was  centered  in  the  Language  Arts  and  PSME  divisions,  enrollment  is  now  more  evenly  distributed  among  Language  Arts,  Social  Sciences  and  PSME  divisions.  

•  At  the  department  level,  enrollment  is  more  concentrated  in  ENGL  (23%),  MATH  (19%)  and  PHED  (12%).  

1LA24%

1SS22%

1PS21%

1PE15%

1FA10%

1BH4%

1GU3%

1SE1%

2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Winter 2013 Enrollment by Division (N=183)

Winter  2013  English  

•  45  students  out  of  the  61  students  who  completed  Summer  Bridge  enrolled  in  an  English  course  in  fall  (74%).  

•  39  students  out  of  56  students  who  completed  Summer  Bridge  enrolled  in  an  English  course  in  winter  (70%).  

•  Students  appear  to  be  progressing  through  English  sequence.    

 ENGL242A  is  a  corequisite  with  ENGL1S,  and  ENGL242B  is  a  corequisite  with  ENGL1T,    so  two  students  are  double  counted  in  fall  and    three  students  were  double  counted  in  winter.  Note  that  out  of  the  7  students  enrolled  in  ENGL  209  in  W13,  3  are  repeaeng  the  course.  

ENGL-F209.60%ENGL-F001A

13%

ENGL-F110.11%

ENGL-F001B8%

ENGL-F001S4%

ENGL-F242A4%

2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Fall 2012 Enrollment in English Department (N=47)

ENGL-F11050%

ENGL-F20917%

ENGL-F001A14%

ENGL-F001B5%

ENGL-F001T5%

ENGL-F242B5%

ENGL-F001S2%

ENGL-F242A2%

2012 Foothil College Summer Bridge ProgramWinter 2013 Enrollment in English Department (N=42)

Winter  2013  Math  

•  Fall  2012:  42  students  out  of  the  61  students  who  completed  Summer  Bridge  enrolled  in  a  Math  course  (69%)  –  35  students  enrolled  in  English  and  Math  (57%)  

•  Winter  2013:  34  students  out  of  the  56  students  who  completed  Summer  Bridge  enrolled  in  a  Math  course  (61%)  –  24  students  enrolled  in  English  and  Math  (43%)  

MATH-F10535%

MATH-F01024%

MATH-F23518%

MATH-F2309%

MATH-F0576%

MATH-F2206%

MATH-F048A3%

2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge ProgramWinter 2013 Enrollment in Math Department (N=34)

MATH-F010.22%

MATH-F220.24%

MATH-F105.18%

NCBS 401A16%

MATH-F235.10%

MATH-F108.4%

MATH-F217.4%

MATH-F048A2%

2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Fall 2012 Enrollment in Math Department (N=42)

½  of  NCBS401A  students  in  F12  enrolled  in  MATH  235  in  W13  

Fall  2012  and  Winter  2013  Enrollment  

66  enrolled                        

61  completed  Summer  Bridge  

                 

 42  enrolled  in  

Math              

6  Fall  only    3  with  Math,    

3  without  Math  

61  enrolled                      

56  completed  Summer  Bridge  

             

 34  enrolled  in  

Math          

1  Winter  only  

The  three  who  enrolled  in  math    were  unsuccessful  (10,  220,  235)  

Enr.  In  Eng  209,  no  math  Math  placement:  NCBS  401A  

55  students  enrolled    in  fall  and  winter  

27  students  enrolled    in  Math  in  fall  and  winter  

5  non-­‐completers  enrolled  in    fall  and  winter  (same  students),    No  math.  One  enrolled  &  successfully    Passed  English  1A  in  fall  

Summer  Bridge  Cohort  Math  Course  Progress  

73  66  

42  

21   17  

21  

10  

Enrolled in next course Repeated fall courseMath 10 4 4Math 48A 1 0Math 57 2 0Math 105 7 4Math 108 0 0Math 217 0 0Math 220 0 1Math 230 3 0Math 235 0 1Total 17 10

7  N

Math 105 1Math 220 1Math 235 5Total 7

Total  num

ber  e

nrolled  in  th

e  program  

Completers  

Enrolled  in  m

ath  

Success  

Non

 Success  

Next  course  enr.  

Repeaters  

Winter  only  

Summary  

•  Majority  of  students  who  succeeded  in  their  math  course  are  taking  next  level  math  in  winter  (81%).  

•  Almost  half  of  the  students  who  didn’t  pass  their  math  course  are  repeaeng  in  winter  (48%).  

•  Increase  in  Math  placement  levels  does  not  appear  to  necessarily  translate  into  higher  success  at  the  math  courses.  

•  Lower  level  math  courses  had  higher  level  of  success.  

Implicaeons  

•  Consider  the  effect  of  placing  students  at  a  higher  math  level  and  whether  they  are  successful  in  this  course  

•  Consider  interveneon  aher  Summer  Bridge  •  Consider  math  skills  needed  in  Math  10  (staesecs)  compared  to  other  math  courses  

•  Consider  students  who  only  need  Math  105/108