2012 Portfolio
-
Upload
chad-wulleman -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
description
Transcript of 2012 Portfolio
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO
SECTION A ACADEMIC Huntington Theatre Expansion Experimental Project Studio Ergonomics of Space: Thesis
SECTION B PROFESSIONAL Buckley & Associates R. Riccardi Architects
SECTION C PERSONAL
Arch Photography Graphic Designs
-
ACADEMIC WORK: WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
-
HUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION CONCEPTUALHUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION VIEW ANALYSIS
PROPOSED SITE
PROPOSED SITE
-
PARTIAL COMPUTER MODELS HUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION
-
HUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION CONCEPTUALThe huntington Theatre Expansion emcompasses the addition of several supposrt spaces for the primary theatre on Huntington Avenue including workshops for set design, a green room, black box theatre and a large lobby to accomadate not only the new addition but for the existing theatre as well. My initial expolarations began by attempting to address the issue of how incredibly lost the theatre had been along its current facade. By studying site lines and possible view points I was able to develop an overall concept focused on opening the building toward Copley square in an attempt to draw more of this part of the city to the site as well as creat very distict views framing the prudential tower. This concept would additionally expand to encompass ways in which to open up to and capture natural lighting. Thru numerous light studies through renderings and animations I was able to create a variety of methods of capturing light while mimizing direct light contact on occupants of the building. The large concrete planes that rotate outward and upward would become the aligning force within the building. By opening and splaying it would allow circulation to move around these places to create spaces while never allowing the occupants to travel directly thru them.
-
PARTIAL COMPUTER MODELS HUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION
Partial Model 1.1 Partial Model 1.2
Partial Model 1.3
-
HUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION RENDERED SECTION
-
DETAILED SECTION HUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION
Ground Floor3'-10"
2nd Floor15'-2 1/4"
3rd Floor26'-9 1/8"
3rd Floor55'-2"
0 5 10 15 20 25 FT
-
BLACK BOX
WOMENS'
WOMENS'
PRINCIPAL
DRESSING
PRIMARY
DRESSINGBOX
OFFICE
LOBBY
MECHANICAL
ROOM
HVAC DUCT SPACECHORUS
DRESSING
TECH
BOOTH
0 25 35 45 55 65 FT
SHOP FLOOR
STORAGE
PRINCIPAL
DRESSING
PRIMARY
DRESSING
CHORUS
DRESSING
PRINCIPAL
DRESSING
PRIMARY
DRESSING
CHORUS
DRESSING
BLACK BOX
LIGHT
WELL
0 10 20 30 40 50 FT
HUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION SITE SECTIONS
-
BLACK BOX
WOMENS'
WOMENS'
PRINCIPAL
DRESSING
PRIMARY
DRESSINGBOX
OFFICE
LOBBY
MECHANICAL
ROOM
HVAC DUCT SPACECHORUS
DRESSING
TECH
BOOTH
0 25 35 45 55 65 FT
SHOP FLOOR
STORAGE
PRINCIPAL
DRESSING
PRIMARY
DRESSING
CHORUS
DRESSING
PRINCIPAL
DRESSING
PRIMARY
DRESSING
CHORUS
DRESSING
BLACK BOX
LIGHT
WELL
0 10 20 30 40 50 FT
-
HUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION 1ST FLOOR PLAN
LOBBY
BOX OFFICE
WOMEN'S
MEN'S
PRIMARYDRESSING
SHOP FLOOR
LIGHT LAB
OFFICESPRAY BOOTH
FIRE
FIRE
LIGHTWELL
PRIMARYDRESSING
HANGOUT ZONEAGE
UP
UP
DN
DN
DN
UP
UP
DN
DN
UP
UP
193
97 sf
A1
A1
A2 A2
00 10 20 30 40 FT
-
2ND FLOOR PLAN HUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION
00 10 20 30 40 FT
OPEN TO BELOW
CHILLAX AREA
WOMEN'S
MEN'S
PRINCIPALDRESSING
OPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TOBELOW
FIRE
FIRE
LIGHTWELL
PRINCIPALDRESSING
OPEN TOBELOW
OPEN TOBELOW
OPEN TO BELOW
UP
DN
UP
UP
DN
DN
DN
UP
-
LIGHT WELL
0 5 10 15 20 FT
HUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION DETAILED PLAN
-
RAIL / LIGHTING DETAILSCALE 2 = 1-0
SETTING BLOCK
NEOPRENE GASKETS
DOUBLE GLAZED
SAFETY GLASS
FLASHING
STRUCTURAL RAFTER
ANCHOR BOLT
CURB RAIL
CONDENSATE GUTTER
0 1 2 3 FT
DETAILS HUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION
-
HUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION INTERIOR RENDERINGS
-
EXTERIOR RENDERINGS HUNTINGTON THEATRE EXPANSION
-
EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT STUDIO SITE PLANThe studio for experimental projects in Berlin, Germany was developed in coordination with two other architecture students from Wentworth. Beginning with the development of a quite simple site design strategy to implement three new programmatic spaces into a site with several existing art and theatre buildings. By examining factors such as methods of transportation surrounding the site we developed an idea of varying porosity from solid almost non existent. My individual project became the one that would be a non-building or rather one which would have the least impact at ground level. Hence allowing complete freedom of movement a ground level with little obstruction. I began with a simple strategy of placing as many programmatic spaces as possible below grade which would have the lease impact of reduced opportunity for natural light. Spaces such as the auditorium and rehearsal spaces would work naturally well in this environment. Several spaces however such as offices and any type of common space would require a great deal more natural light and would ultimately lead to elevating the majority of these spaces to the third floor resulting in a building that at first glance would appear to be a bridge whilst housing a much larger building below grade. This idea of a bridge building would begin to influence all aspects of the building including an entry walk at grade elevated above large sunken courtyards, which would allow natural light into the more public spaces below. The detailing would also reflect that of a bridge creating an all encompassing concept creating an overall powerful unity.
-
FLOOR PLANS EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT STUDIO
PERFORMANCE
REHEARSAL REHEARSAL REHEARSAL REHEARSAL
WORKSHOP
WORKSHOP
SEMINAR
SEMINAR
MECHANICAL STORAGE
CAFE
WCWC
WC WC
LOBBY
CONFERENCE CONFERENCEOFFICE OFFICE OFFICESTG. STG.
WCWCWCWC
LOBBY
PERFORMANCE
P1. BASEMENTSCALE=1:200
P2. GROUND FLOORSCALE=1:200
P3. FIRST FLOORSCALE=1:200
1
S
1
S
1
E
1
E
1
S
1
S
1
E
1
E
1
S
1
S
1
E
1
E
E1. SOUTH ELEVATIONSCALE=1:200
S1. SECTIONSCALE=1:200
CAFE WORKSHOP SEMINARCOURTYARDCOURTYARD
COURTYARD COURTYARD
WCWC
OPEN TO BELOWOPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TO BELOWOPEN TO BELOW
P6
P5
P4
WORKSPACEWORKSPACE
WORKSPACEWORKSPACE
CONFERENCE
305 sqm
6 sqm
20 sqm 20 sqm 20 sqm 20 sqm
75 sqm
110 sqm 110 sqm
29 sqm 29 sqm
97 sqm
97 sqm 50 sqm
50 sqm
6 sqm
36 sqm44 sqm
15 sqm 15 sqm
14 sqm 14 sqm
20 sqm 20 sqm
100 sqm
20 sqm7 sqm 82 sqm 23 sqm
23 sqm22 sqm 60 sqm 7 sqm
6 sqm 6 sqm
20 sqm
6 sqm 6 sqm
-
EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT STUDIO BASEMENT DETAIL FLOOR PLAN
REH
EA
RSA
LREH
EA
RSA
L
AD
JU
STA
BLE F
LO
OR
AD
JU
STA
BLE
HEIG
HT S
TA
GE
UP
11 R @ 17cm
11
R @
17
cm
PERFO
RM
AN
CE S
PA
CE
OU
TD
OO
R C
OU
RT
CA
FE
OU
TD
OO
R C
OU
RT
WC
WC
BEN
CH
SEA
TIN
GBA
R
2.5
m7
.04
m3
.26
m3
.26
m
4.55m 2.2m 15.95m
UP
11 R @ 17cm
11
R @
17
cm
WC
WC
11
R @
17
cm
10 R @ 17cm
DO
WN
LO
BBY
RECEPTIO
N D
ESK
OPEN
TO
BELO
W
OPEN
TO
BELO
W
OPEN
TO
BELO
W
OPEN
TO
BELO
W
2.4
1m
5.9
m1
.07
m3
.52
m3
.52
m1
.07
m
4.91m 2.23m 16.31m
WA
TER
WA
TER
0.0
0m
F.F
.
-0.1
6m
R.F
.
-5.5
0m
F.F
.
-5.7
0m
R.F
.-5
.70
m F
.F.
-5.5
0m
F.F
.
-5.7
0m
R.F
.
SLO
PE U
P 2
%
SLO
PE U
P 2
%
-4.9
0m
F.F
.
-5.1
0m
R.F
.SLO
PE U
P 2
%
ACO
USTIC
PA
NEL W
ALL
ACO
USTIC
PA
NEL W
ALL
ACO
USTIC
PA
NEL W
ALL
OU
TD
OO
R G
ATH
ERIN
G S
PA
CE
P4
. PA
RTIA
L P
LA
N
SCA
LE =
1:5
0
P5
. PA
RTIA
L P
LA
N
SCA
LE =
1:5
0
-
1ST FLOOR DETAIL PLAN EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT STUDIO
REH
EA
RSA
LREH
EA
RSA
L
AD
JU
STA
BLE F
LO
OR
AD
JU
STA
BLE
HEIG
HT S
TA
GE
UP
11 R @ 17cm
11
R @
17
cm
PERFO
RM
AN
CE S
PA
CE
OU
TD
OO
R C
OU
RT
CA
FE
OU
TD
OO
R C
OU
RT
WC
WC
BEN
CH
SEA
TIN
GBA
R
2.5
m7
.04
m3
.26
m3
.26
m
4.55m 2.2m 15.95m
UP
11 R @ 17cm
11
R @
17
cm
WC
WC
11
R @
17
cm
10 R @ 17cm
DO
WN
LO
BBY
RECEPTIO
N D
ESK
OPEN
TO
BELO
W
OPEN
TO
BELO
W
OPEN
TO
BELO
W
OPEN
TO
BELO
W
2.4
1m
5.9
m1
.07
m3
.52
m3
.52
m1
.07
m
4.91m 2.23m 16.31m
WA
TER
WA
TER
0.0
0m
F.F
.
-0.1
6m
R.F
.
-5.5
0m
F.F
.
-5.7
0m
R.F
.-5
.70
m F
.F.
-5.5
0m
F.F
.
-5.7
0m
R.F
.
SLO
PE U
P 2
%
SLO
PE U
P 2
%
-4.9
0m
F.F
.
-5.1
0m
R.F
.SLO
PE U
P 2
%
ACO
USTIC
PA
NEL W
ALL
ACO
USTIC
PA
NEL W
ALL
ACO
USTIC
PA
NEL W
ALL
OU
TD
OO
R G
ATH
ERIN
G S
PA
CE
P4
. PA
RTIA
L P
LA
N
SCA
LE =
1:5
0
P5
. PA
RTIA
L P
LA
N
SCA
LE =
1:5
0
-
EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT STUDIO 2ND FLOOR DETAIL PLAN
AD
JUSTA
BLE F
LO
OR (
appro
x. 1
m)
11 R @ 17cm
11
R @
17
cm
DO
WN
LO
UN
GE
OPEN
TO
BELO
W
10 R @ 17cm
CO
NFEREN
CE R
OO
MCO
NFEREN
CE R
OO
MO
FFIC
E
5.5
0m
F.F
.
5.3
0m
R.F
.
6.7
4m
6.5
2m
4.32m 2.08m 2.38m 7.85m 6.02m
PERFO
RM
AN
CE S
PA
CE
REH
EA
RSA
L
OFFIC
E
SU
SPEN
DED
CEIL
ING
GRID
AD
JUSTA
BLE S
TA
GE
Base
ment
Flo
or
-5.5
0m
Gro
und F
loor
0.0
0m
First
Flo
or
+5
.50
m
Roof
+1
0.5
0m
CO
NFEREN
CE R
OO
M
Bridge R
oof
+9
.00
m
ACO
USTIC
PA
NELS
ACO
USTIC
PA
NELS
Sub B
ase
ment
Flo
or
-6.5
0m
ACO
USTIC
PA
NELS
D2
S3
P6
. PA
RTIA
L P
LA
NSCA
LE =
1:5
0
S2
. EN
LA
RG
ED
SECTIO
NSCA
LE =
1:5
0
-
ELEVATION?SECTION EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT STUDIO
PERFO
RM
AN
CE
REH
EA
RSA
LREH
EA
RSA
LREH
EA
RSA
LREH
EA
RSA
L
WO
RKSH
OP
WO
RKSH
OP
SEM
INA
R
SEM
INA
R
MECH
AN
ICA
LSTO
RA
GE
CA
FE
WC
WC
WC
WC
LO
BBY
CO
NFEREN
CE
CO
NFEREN
CE
OFFIC
EO
FFIC
EO
FFIC
ESTG
.STG
.
WC
WC
WC
WC
LO
BBY
PERFO
RM
AN
CE
P1
. BA
SEM
EN
TSCA
LE=
1:2
00
P2
. G
RO
UN
D F
LO
OR
SCA
LE=
1:2
00
P3
. FIR
ST F
LO
OR
SCA
LE=
1:2
00
1 S
1 S
1 E
1 E
1 S
1 S
1 E
1 E
1 S
1 S
1 E
1 E
E1
. SO
UTH
ELEV
ATIO
NSCA
LE=
1:2
00
S1
. SECTIO
NSCA
LE=
1:2
00
CA
FE
WO
RKSH
OP
SEM
INA
RCO
URTYA
RD
CO
URTYA
RD
CO
URTYA
RD
CO
URTYA
RD
WC
WC
OPEN
TO
BELO
WO
PEN
TO
BELO
W
OPEN
TO
BELO
WO
PEN
TO
BELO
W
P6
P5
P4
WO
RKSPA
CE
WO
RKSPA
CE
WO
RKSPA
CE
WO
RKSPA
CE
CO
NFEREN
CE
30
5 s
qm
6 s
qm
20
sqm
20
sqm
20
sqm
20
sqm
75
sqm
11
0 s
qm
11
0 s
qm
29
sqm
29
sqm
97
sqm
97
sqm
50
sqm
50
sqm
6 s
qm
36
sqm
44
sqm
15
sqm
15
sqm
14
sqm
14
sqm
20
sqm
20
sqm
10
0 s
qm
20
sqm
7 s
qm
82
sqm
23
sqm
23
sqm
22
sqm
60
sqm
7 s
qm
6 s
qm
6 s
qm
20
sqm
6 s
qm
6 s
qm
-
EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT STUDIO DETAILED SECTION
AD
JUSTA
BLE F
LO
OR (
appro
x. 1m
)
11 R @ 17cm
11
R @
17
cm
DO
WN
LO
UN
GE
OPEN
TO
BELO
W
10 R @ 17cm
CO
NFEREN
CE R
OO
MCO
NFEREN
CE R
OO
MO
FFIC
E
5.5
0m
F.F
.
5.3
0m
R.F
.
6.7
4m
6.5
2m
4.32m 2.08m 2.38m 7.85m 6.02m
PERFO
RM
AN
CE S
PA
CE
REH
EA
RSA
L
OFFIC
E
SUSPEN
DED
CEIL
ING
GRID
AD
JUSTA
BLE S
TA
GE
Base
ment
Flo
or
-5.5
0m
Gro
und F
loor
0.0
0m
First
Flo
or
+5.5
0m
Roof
+1
0.5
0m
CO
NFEREN
CE R
OO
M
Bridge R
oof
+9.0
0m
ACO
USTIC
PA
NELS
ACO
USTIC
PA
NELS
Sub B
ase
ment
Flo
or
-6.5
0m
ACO
USTIC
PA
NELS
D2
S3
P6
. PA
RTIA
L P
LA
NSCA
LE =
1:5
0
S2
. EN
LA
RG
ED
SECTIO
NSCA
LE =
1:5
0
-
DETAILS EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT STUDIO
Glazing
wing/cap
End plate,
web stiffener
Guide rail
Loadbearing glazing bar
Column
Purlin
Insulating glass
Permanently elastic preformed seal
Sunblind
Sandwich panel
Rigid Insulation (100 mm)
COLUMNS BEHIND FACADE
STEEL PANELS
Roof Membrane (1 mm)
Vapour Barrier (1 mm)
Vapour Barrier (1 mm)
Concrete (100 mm)
Steel Decking
Steel Tube (12 cm dia.)
Suspended Acoustic Tiles
OFFICE
REHEARSAL
Rigid Insulation (100 mm)
Wood Flooring (10 mm)
Vapour Barrier (1 mm)
Concrete (100 mm)
Steel Decking
Screed (5 cm)
Steel I-Beam (W310 x 202)
Rigid Insulation (100 mm)
Wood Flooring (10 mm)
Vapour Barrier (1 mm)
Concrete (200 mm)
Screed with unfedoor heating (50 mm)Vapour Barrier (1 mm)
Lean Concrete (50 mm)
Concrete (200 mm)
Vapour Barrier (1 mm)
Rigid Insulation (100 mm)
S3. Wall SectionScale = 1:20
E2. Bridge ElevationScale = 1:20
P7. Plan SectionScale = 1:20
D1. Mullion DetailScale = 1:2
D2. Skylight DetailScale = 1:5
Silicone / Adhesive Aluminum Spacer
Thermal Break
Edge Seal
Post Section
-
ERGONOMICS OF SPACE CONCEPTUALERGONOMICS OF SPACE CONCEPTUAL
-
PARTIAL COMPUTER MODELS ERGONOMICS OF SPACEIn the current state of architecture the dominance of rectilinear spaces has created an architecture that has little to no relation to the program contained within. Each room has become an open space that could contain an innumerable amount of programs. This dilemma is one that could be considered as equal to that of a building placed within a site that makes no relation to its surrounding context. To create architecture sympathetic to what is contained within a very rigorous analysis is necessary. The means in which the occupant moves through space as well as their interaction with equipment becomes one necessary aspect while that of the equipment itself and its proper usage must also be examined. This analysis must also take into consideration site forces that can begin to inform the overall building form. In this instance the program is that of a vocational school due to its inherent variety in activities that take place. Through this analysis every space can become a near perfect fit for each of its uses. It is a building essentially created by the manner in which it is occupied and utilized that fits like a glove. An architecture of ergonomic spaces. A building reacting to the movement of its occupants, the high speed movement on its exterior, and in response to properly moving natural lighting into the varying spaces. As the human occupant is of utmost importance the building itself reacts by providing the user a variety of necessary surfaces from tables, to seating, to counters, to storage. One might deem it a building and a piece of furniture.
Reactionary architecture.
-
ERGONOMICS OF SPACE CONCEPTUAL: SPATIAL OCCUPATION
-
CONCEPTUAL: SPATIAL OCCUPATION ERGONOMICS OF SPACE
-
ERGONOMICS OF SPACE CONCEPTUAL: LONG EXPOSURE LED
-
LONGXPOSURE LED TRANSLATIONS ERGONOMICS OF SPACE
-
ERGONOMICS OF SPACE CONCEPTUAL: PROGRAMMATIC SPACE APPLICATION
-
ERGONOMICS OF SPACE CONCEPTUAL: MULTIPLE EXPOSURE A
-
CONCEPTUAL: MULTIPLE EXPOSURE B ERGONOMICS OF SPACE
-
ERGONOMICS OF SPACE SURFACE AND MATERIALS
Poured Concrete:Floor Slabs
Oakum Plywood:Wood Shop, Caf
Wood Banding:Auditorium
Brushed Steel Cladding:Facade Skin
Plastic Panels:Facade, Gallery
-
FLOOR PLANS ERGONOMICS OF SPACE
AUD IT OR IUM
C AF E
S T OR AG E
K IT CH E N
OFF ICE
R E C EP T ION
WOO D S HOP
ME T AL S HOP
DE MONS T R AT ION R OO M
S HOP S T OR AG E
S HOP S T OR AG E
G ALL E RY
C LASS R OO M
C LASS R OO M
Open to B elow
Open to B elow
Open to B elow
Open to B elow
LIB R ARY
R AISE D R E ADING AR E A
1st Floor Plan 2nd Floor Plan
B
C
A
-
ERGONOMICS OF SPACE SECTION PERSPECTIVES
Section A
Section B
-
Section C
-
ERGONOMICS OF SPACE RENDERINGS
Above: Exterior Perspective Below: Gallery Perspective
-
RENDERINGS ERGONOMICS OF SPACE
Above: Shop Perspective from Gallery Below: 2nd Floor Hall Perspective
-
PROFESSIONAL WORK: GREATER BOSTON AND NEW YORK
-
BUCKLEY & ASSOCIATES FOX RESIDENCE
-
FOX RESIDENCE BUCKLEY & ASSOCIATES
-
BUCKLEY & ASSOCIATES FOX RESIDENCE
-
FOX RESIDENCE BUCKLEY & ASSOCIATES
-
BUCKLEY & ASSOCIATES FOX RESIDENCE
-
ST. ANNES HOSPITAL BUCKLEY & ASSOCIATES
-
RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS FAIRLEY RESIDENCE KITCHEN RENDERINGS
-
FAIRLEY RESIDENCE BATHROOM RENDERING RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS
-
RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS WILLIAMS RESIDENCE OUTDOOR SHOWER DESIGN
-
WILLIAMS RESIDENCE OUTDOOR SHOWER RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS
Above: Shower Rendering Below: Actual Shower Location
-
RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS WILLIAMS RESIDENCE SCREEN PORCH SECTION
-
WILLIAMS RESIDENCE SCREEN PORCH CONSTRUCTION RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS
-
RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS WILLIAMS RESIDENCE STAIR CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM
-
WILLIAMS RESIDENCE STAIR CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS
-
RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS 101 CENTRAL PARK WEST RENDERINGS
-
101 CENTRAL PARK WEST RENDERINGS RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS
-
RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS 320 WEST END AVE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: PLAN
-
RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS 320 WEST END AVE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: ELEVATIONS
-
RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS 320 WEST END AVE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: ELEVATIONS
-
RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS 320 WEST END AVE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: DETAILS
-
RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS MERCER STREET MAIN LOBBY RENDERING
-
MERCER STREET MAIN LOBBY RENDERING RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS
-
RUSSELL RICCARDI ARCHITECTS MERCER STREET REAR LOBBY SECTION
-
PERSONAL WORK: PHOTOGRAPHY AND GRAPHIC DESIGN
-
PHOTOGRAPHY BARCELONA
-
BERLIN PHOTOGRAPHY
-
PHOTOGRAPHY PARIS
-
WOLFSBURG PHOTOGRAPHY
-
PHOTOGRAPHY HAMPTONS RESIDENCE R
-
HAMPTONS RESIDENCE C PHOTOGRAPHY
-
GRAPHIC DESIGN TEXTURE APPLICATION
-
COMMISSIONED CHRISTMAS CARD GRAPHIC DESIGN