2012 Marek Vácha. Personhood in rural Japan: when an infant utters its first cry northern Ghana:...
-
Upload
daniel-mitchell -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 2012 Marek Vácha. Personhood in rural Japan: when an infant utters its first cry northern Ghana:...
Personhood
in rural Japan: when an infant utters its first cry
northern Ghana: 7 days after birth Ayatal aborigines: personhood is not
obtained until the child is named – and naming occurs 2 or 3 years after birth
native americans in Mojava desert: human life begins for children who live long enough to be put to the mother´s breast
(Gilbert, S.C., Tyler, A.L., Zackin, E.J., (2005) Bioethics and the New Embryology. Sinauer Associates, Inc. W.H. Freeman & comp. Sunderland, MA U.S.A. p. 32)
Embryos
Abortion Embryonic Stem Cell Research
the fetuses are unwanted, usually the result of "accidental" conception
the federal guidelines research (USA) permitt studies conducted on the not-at-all viable aborted fetus, such research merely takes advantage of available "products" of abortions
wanted and deliberately created the fate of these embryos
is not in conflict with the wishes of the pregnant women
deliberate production of embryos for the express purpose of experimentation (in some cases)
Embryos
Abortion Embryonic Stem Cell Research
not-at-all viable pre-viable the blastocyst is possibly
salvageable
Defininition of Human Embryo
A human embryo is a discrete entity that has arisen from either:
(i) the first mitotic division when fertilization of a human oocyte by a human sperm is complete or
(ii) any other process that initiates organized development of a biological entity with a human nuclear genome or altered human nuclear genome that has the potential to develop up to, or beyond, the stage at which the primitive streak appears,
and has not yet reached 8 weeks of development since the first mitotic division.
Extrauterine fetuses
The human brain keeps growing throughout childhood, making millions of new nerv cells each day
if humans were born at the same stage of brain development as their ape relatives, a baby would probably be born at around 18 months, and its head would be far too large to pass through the birth canal.
So it could be said that we spend the first few years of our lives as „extrauterine fetuses“, totally dependent on parental care.
(Gilbert, S.C., Tyler, A.L., Zackin, E.J., (2005) Bioethics and the New Embryology. Sinauer Associates, Inc. W.H. Freeman & comp. Sunderland, MA U.S.A. p. 27)
Personhood
you become human at fertilization in this "genetic view of human life, a new
individůual is ceated at fertilization, when the genes from two parents combine to from a new genome with unique properties.
This is a view that can be maintained with or without religious belief, and it is a position held by some scientists.
(Gilbert, S.C., Tyler, A.L., Zackin, E.J., (2005) Bioethics and the New Embryology. Sinauer Associates, Inc. W.H. Freeman & comp. Sunderland, MA U.S.A. p. 43)
Personhood
you become human at gastrulation this "embryologic" view proposes that a
human receives individual identity around day 14, when the embryo undergoes gastrulation
it is at this point that the embryo can no longer form twins, and it is here that the cells begin the process of diggerentioation into the specific cell types of the new body.
(Gilbert, S.C., Tyler, A.L., Zackin, E.J., (2005) Bioethics and the New Embryology. Sinauer Associates, Inc. W.H. Freeman & comp. Sunderland, MA U.S.A. p. 43)
Personhood
the acquisition of the human EEG pattern is when you become this "embryologic" view proposes that a
human receives individual identity around day 14, when the embryo undergoes gastrulation
it is at this point that the embryo can no longer form twins, and it is here that the cells begin the process of diggerentioation into the specific cell types of the new body.
(Gilbert, S.C., Tyler, A.L., Zackin, E.J., (2005) Bioethics and the New Embryology. Sinauer Associates, Inc. W.H. Freeman & comp. Sunderland, MA U.S.A. p. 43)
in the proper biological sense, „life“ does not begin anew with each generation. The sperm and the egg are moving, metabolizing cells and are in fact biologically alive
(Gilbert, S.C., Tyler, A.L., Zackin, E.J., (2005) Bioethics and the New Embryology. Sinauer Associates, Inc. W.H. Freeman & comp. Sunderland, MA U.S.A. p. 31)
Human EmbryoLuis Santamaría, U.A.M., Spain
Human embryos are not: some other type of animal organism, like a pre-
human entity neither are they a part of an organism, like a heart,
a kidney, or a skin cells nor again are they a disorganized aggregate, a
mere clump of cells awaiting some magical transformations
rather, a human embryo is a whole living member of the species Homo sapiens in the earliest of his or her natural development
Human EmbryoLuis Santamaría, U.A.M., Spain
Human embryos are, from the very beginning, human beings, sharing an identity with, though younger than, human beings they will grow up to become
Embryo science, Embryo technology, Embryo ethicsLuis Santamaría, U.A.M., Spain Embryo science
tells us what the embryos are and when they begin
Embryo technologies represent the abilities of researchers to do
things to or with embryos they can make embryos in lab, by IVF or by
cloning they can keep embryos alive in the lab whether
in culture, or indefinitely by freezing they can destroy these embryos
Embryo science, Embryo technology, Embryo ethicsLuis Santamaría, U.A.M., Spain Embryo ethics
are such manipulation morally right? it is not uncommon to hear embryo
researchers claim that only science should have a say what science does, and that ethics, religion and politics have no business in the concerns of science
it is true that moral philosophy cannot say what embryo is nor has anything to say about what can be done with an embryo
Embryo science, Embryo technology, Embryo ethicsLuis Santamaría, U.A.M., Spain
but science has nothing to say about what we ought to do, even in the domain of science
Geoffrey Chu, 2003
certain medical research is unethical and unjustifiable (i.e. Nazi experiments) and should always be prohibited, regardless of significant potential gains.
Accepting this premise renders utilitarian arguments in favour of ESC research irrelevant if the human embryo is considered to be an individual human being.
Utilitarian arguments have serious limitations because the eventual outcome of benefits and harms is initially uncertain and may remain unclear for a substantial period − decades or longer.
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118897797/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
Geoffrey Chu, 2003
In the early phases of this continuum, we casually redefine 'human' to suit our personal agendas. (…) Emergence of the embryonic streak on day 14 is another unfortunate arbitrary definition of who is human.
Those who have lost part of their cortex from a stroke or Alzheimer's Disease are no less human than they were beforehand.
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118897797/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
Arguments For
The demise of the unimplanted embryos would be analogous to the loss of numerous embryos wasted in the normal in vivo attempts to generate a child. It is estimated that over 50 percent of eggs successfully fertilized during unprotected sexual intercourse fail to implant, or do not remain implanted, in the uterine wall, and are shed soon thereafter, before a diagnosis of pregnancy could be made.
Any couple attempting to conceive a child tacitly accepts the sad fact of such embryonic wastage as the perfectly tolerable price to be paid for the birth of a (usually) healthy child.
Current procedures to initiate pregnancy with laboratory fertilization thus differ from the natural process in that what would normally be spread over four or five monthes in vivo is compressed into a single effort, using all at once a four or five months suply of eggs.
Kass, L.R., (2002) Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity. Encounter Books, New York, London. p. 88
Arguments Against
The natural loss of embryos in early pregnancy cannot in itself be a warrant for deliberately aborting them or for invasively experimenting on them in vitro, any more than stillbirths could be a justification for newborn infanticide.
There many things that happen naturally that we ought not do deliberately.
Arguments against
the zygote and early embryonic stages are clearly alive they metabolize, respire and respond to changes
in the environment; they grow and divide
the blastocyst is an organic whole, self-developing, genetically unique and distinct from the sperm and egg something new and alive in a different sense
comes into being with fertilization Kass, L.R., (2002) Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity. Encounter Books, New York, London. p. 87
Arguments against
Even Dr. Robert Edwards had apparently stumbled over this truth, perhaps inadvertently, in his remark about Louise Brown:
"The last time I saw her, she was just eight cells in a test-tube. She was beautiful then, and she´s still beautiful now!"
Kass, L.R., (2002) Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity. Encounter Books, New York, London. p. 88
Arguments against
I myself would agree that a blastocyst is not, in a full sense, a human being, or what the current fashion calls, a person
Yet, at the same time, I must acknowledge that the human blastocyst is human in origin potentially a mature human being, if all goes well in vitro blastocyst is exactly what a human being is
at that stage of human development. Kass, L.R., (2002) Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity. Encounter Books, New York, London.
p. 88
Arguments Against
… the intentional production of fetuses for research is tantamount to murder, and uses humen life simply as a means rather than as an end
Arguments Against
„A human embryo is a whole living member of the species homo sapiens in the earliest stage of his or her natural development. Unless denied a suitable environment, an embryonic human being will by directing its own integral organic functioning develop himself or herself to the next more mature developmental stage, i.e., the fetal stage. The embryonic, fetal, infant, child, and adolescent stages are stages in the development of a determinate and enduring entity—a human being—who comes into existence as a single cell organism and develops, if all goes well, into adulthood many years later.“
http://www.cbrinfo.com/cloning.html
Arguments Against
In this way, the practice of multiple embryo transfer implies a purely utilitarian treatment of embryos. One is struck by the fact that, in any other area of medicine, ordinary professional ethics and the healthcare authorities themselves would never allow a medical procedure which involved such a high number of failures and fatalities.