2012 Bond & Mill Levy Planning: Community Planning and ...€¦ · CPAC Mission and Stakeholder...

Denver Public Schools

2012 Bond & Mill Levy Planning:

Community Planning and Advisory Committee (CPAC)

Recommendation to the Board of Education

June 18, 2012

Agenda

� CPAC process

� Need for funds

� CPAC funding recommendations

� Regional impact and tax implications

� Next steps

- 2 -

CPAC Process

- 3 -

CPAC Mission and Stakeholder Responsibilities

- 4 -

Mission� Serve as an advisory committee to the district as to whether DPS should pursue a bond, mill

levy, or both, and if so, how to prioritize investments to be covered in those ballot initiatives

CPAC Responsibility

� Advise the district as to whether DPS should pursue a bond, mill levy, or both, and if so, how to prioritize investments to be covered in those ballot initiatives

� Determine committee members to chair the sub-committees

� Evaluate recommendations regarding prioritization of investments across committees, and create consolidated recommendation to the DPS Board of Education.

CPAC Sub-committee Responsibility

� Deeper level of analysis into specific areas of potential investment within sub-committee

� Provide recommendations to the overall committee regarding prioritization

DPS Responsibility� Identify needs and prioritize potential investments for the bond and mill levy

� Categorize investments to better organize efforts

Board of Education

Vote and prioritize as to whether to go forward with bond and/or mill levy initiatives

CPAC Membership & Organization

- 5 -

Name OrganizationAbarca, Marco Ready Foods President

Abramson, Cindy Denver Scholarship Foundation Executive Director

Anderson, Greg Wings Over the Rockies Air and Space Museum CEO

Arigoni , John Boys and Girls Club of Metro Denver CEO

Bamonte, Derek Guaranteed Rate Mortgage VP, CO Youth for a Change

Black, Kendra University of Colorado Denver

Brantley, Charlotte Clayton Early Learning CEO

Buescher, Tom Buescher, Goldhamer, Kelman & Dodge – current BMLOC

Burgess, Denise Burgess Services

Candelaria, Bernard State Dept of Revenue, Parent of DPS Student

Carroll, Terrance Greenberg Traurig

Childears, Linda Daniels Fund CEO

Clark, Leanna DPS Foundation Board, UCD

Dannemiller , Lauri Denver Park & Recreation Manager

Deibel, Bob OfficeScapes CEO

Dennis, Evie Former DPS Superintendent

Door, Tami Downtown Denver Partnership CEO

Duran, Eric D.A. Davidson & Co.

Elenowitz, Doug Brownfield Partners, LLC

Epperson, Kathy Parent of DPS Student

Flores, Lisa Gates Family Foundation

Fox, Lori United Airlines

Friedman, Amy Book Trust Executive Director

Garcia, Richard Colorado Statewide Parent Coalition

Gilmore, Stacie Environmental Learning for Kids/ Montbello 20/20

Giron, Robert SW Denver Coalition

Gonzales, Joseph Division Chief Denver Fire Department

Griffin, Jim Colorado League of Charter Schools President

Grogan, Barbara Western Industrial Contractors

Grunerud, Helga Hispanic Contractors of Colorado Executive Director

Haddon, Beverly Stapleton Foundation CEO

Haynes, Anna Jo Mile High Montessori President Emeritus

Hoyt, Heidi Community Leader

Johnson, Michael Kutak Rock

Kilgore, Roger Kilgore Consulting and Management

Lee, Eric Colorado Black Chamber of Commerce CEO

Leff, Suzanne Winzenburg, Leff, Purvis & Payne, LLP

Name OrganizationLeid, Kelly Denver Development Services Director

Lewis , Richard RTL Networks, Owner

Lopez Ramirez, Grace Mi Familia Vota Executive Director

Lhevine, Paul Stand for Children Executive Director

Mack, Lori Denver Economic Development – Current BMLOC

Martinez, Scott Deputy City Attorney

Mayr, Susie Parent of DPS Student (Bromwell)

Moss, Michelle Former DPS BoE Member - Current BMLOC

Mueller, Amy Kaiser Permanente

Murray, Malcolm Murray, Dahl, Kuechenmeister & Renaud LLP

Neil , Lindsay Mayor's Office for Education and Children Director

Norvelle, Glenna Denver Kids CEO - Current BMLOC

Pathy, Vatsala Rootstock Solutions - Current BMLOC

Piper, Eileen Denver Preschool Program Executive Director

Rau , Bruce Oakwood Homes/HC Development

Reinisch, Katie Parent of DPS Student (East)

Roberts, Charles Empire Construction President

Rodriguez, Bill HUNI Education Committee Chair

Robinson, Jon UMB Bank CEO

Rubio-Cortez, Gloria National Civic League President

Rusconi, Mike Oracle Corporation, Parent of DPS Student

Salem, Michael National Jewish Health CEO

Schoales, Van A+ Denver Executive Director

Sobanet, Jennifer Front Range Community College

Soler, Ana Civic Canopy

Stanford, Gully College in Colorado Partnerships Director

Strickland, Clark Retired UCD Assistant Dean – Current BMLOC

Taylor, Karen INC

Taylor Owens, Dawn College in Colorado Executive Director

Techmanski, Dave Wells Fargo President

Trierweiler, Ginny Family Star Montessori CEO

Ward, Tamra Colorado Concern CEO

Warter , Rick Breo Solutions CEO

Whalen, Reeves Burg, Simpson, Eldredge, Hersh, Jardine, PC

Withers, Molly Withers & Associates; Parent of DPS Student (Asbury)

Wood, Chris Parent of DPS Student (Brown)

Yankovich, Mike Children's Museum CEO

Overall CPAC

Facility Maintenance

Mill Levy

New Facilities

Technology

2012 Bond-Mill Levy: CPAC Meeting Schedule28 Planning Meetings were held over the past 5 months

- 6 -

2012

Feb Mar Apr May Jun

Feb 14900 Grant

Feb 29Place Bridge

Mar 21North HS

Apr 10Kunsmiller

May 9Swigert-McAuliffe

May 23Del Pueblo

June 6Emily

Griffith

Mar 6South

Mar 7DoTS

Mar 13Webb Building

Apr 3Charter League

Apr 17Stapleton

Apr 4900 Grant

Apr 18Del Pueblo

Mar 14900 Grant

Mar 19South

May 1Del Pueblo

May 8Del Pueblo

Apr 30Del Pueblo

Apr 5West

Apr 18Morey

Apr 25Thomas

Jefferson

May 2Valdez

May 16Cheltenham

Apr 4Grant MS

Apr 20NE Terminal

Apr 25DoTS

May 3900 Grant

CPAC Meeting Locations were held in a variety of locations across Denver

- 7 -

Community Voice Opportunities

- 8 -

Several ways of capturing feedback and input from the community were established

Survey Public CommentEmailPlanning Website

� On the DPS website, a link to a survey form was provided in both English and Spanish

� The survey captured feedback from over 1,100 community members and results were provided to CPAC members for consideration

� Printed survey forms – in English and Spanish - were offered at the Parent Forum, and multiple community meetings. Responses were entered and recorded in survey database.

� Printed surveys were offered at the Student Board of Education’s May meeting and responses were entered and recorded in database.

� On-line survey was advertised in English, Spanish and Vietnamese

� 15 minutes were allocated at the beginning of each CPAC meeting for public comment.

� A sign-up sheet was provided at each meeting and slots were assigned on a first-come first-serve basis.

� Individuals were allocated up to 3 minutes to speak.

� Community groups could present together, but were asked to select one speaker.

� Existing bond website was updated to include 2012 planning: bond.dpsk12.org/

� This site contains:� Calendar of meetings� Meeting materials� Reference materials

(research reports, appendix material, etc.)

� List of CPAC members� Sub-committee information� Meeting follow-up’s

� A dedicated email address was established for the CPAC chairs: [email protected]

� The chairs received email and responded to input from the community

Summary Findings from DPS Website Survey

- 9 -

28%

28%

30%

42%

46%

57%

69%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

EnrichmentPrograms

ClassroomTechnology

InstructionalAssistance

PreventLayoffs

Lengthen the School Day

Early ChildhoodEducation

Lengthen the Academic Year

Mill Levy Priorities

35%

45%

64%

67%

68%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Sustainability ofFacilities

Preserve Existing buildings

Technology

Safety

New SchoolCapacity

Bond Priorities

Nearly 1,100 respondents answered the question: “How would you prioritize bond (or mill levy) investments that are being considered by the CPAC. Please rank your top 3 investments.”

* Full survey results are provided as an appendix to this presentation

The Need for Funding

- 10 -

72,490 72,188 72,565 72,652 73,013 73,503 74,564

77,292

79,423

81,870

70,000

75,000

80,000

85,000

90,000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

District Enrollment Growth

- 11 -

Increase of 8,400 students, or 2.8% per year

Of metro districts, only Douglas county has added more students since 2006 than Denver.

Recent Growth

� Between 2006 and 2011 Colorado enrollment grew by 8%. During the same period DPS has grown 12%

� Over the past 5 years, DPS has increased enrollment 8,400 students, or 2.8% per year

� 2011 alone saw an increase of 2,000 students versus 2010, a 2.5% increase

� 2003 and 2008 Bonds had limited need for large investments in new capacity due to stagnant enrollment.

Drivers of Recent Growth

� Three primary factors have driven the increase in DPS enrollment:

� Continued, modest, demographic growth in all areas of the city

� Strong residential development in Stapleton and Green Valley Ranch

� Increasing capture rate of students due to improved school offerings, particularly midde and high school

Forecast: Enrollment will increase an additional ~5,400 students by 2016

- 12 -

Forecasted growth rates are well below what they were over past 5 years, but still represent a 1.2% per annum growth.

Over 50% of the growth is expected to come in middle and high school, given low capture rates and improving options.

Forecast increase of 5,400 students, or 1.2% per year

Population Growth

ResidentialDevelopment

Capture Rate

Input Factors Enrollment Forecasts

81,870

83,230 83,836

84,837

85,850

87,298

78,000

80,000

82,000

84,000

86,000

88,000

2011 2012Est.

2013Est.

2014Est.

2015Est.

2016Est.

- 13 -

Facility Maintenance Drivers: DPS buildings are an average of 55 years old

Facility Management – District-Wide Facility Deficiencies

- 14 -

� Total of $1.9 billion of identified needs (excludes new capacity needs)� Evaluations performed over a 20-year timeframe� 5-yr plan prioritized near-term needs into high, medium, and low categories

(over $600 million).

Values as of February 14, 2012

DPS evaluated deficiencies with a 20-year outlook. Prioritization for inclusion in the 2012 bond was determined by looking at the facility needs that need to be addressed over the next 5 years.

District-wide Assessments

ADA & Code, $38.2

Electrical, $36.3

Equipment, $9.9

Emily Griffith , $17.0

New Facility, 0

Fire Systems, $89.5

Mechanical, $218.1

Plumbing, $13.0

Renovation, $95.3

Roofing & Windows, $40.5

Site Work, $22.7

Water & Air Quality, $74.2

State funding cuts make it difficult to catch up with the areas of need

- 15 -- 15 -

The state has decreased per pupil funding by over $800 per student since 2009–10.

$7,672

$7,232

$6,873 $6,868

$6,400

$6,600

$6,800

$7,000

$7,200

$7,400

$7,600

$7,800

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

DPS Per Pupil Funding

Source: 2011-12 CDE Funding Summary

Reductions impact of over $76M in current budget year.

Per pupil funding from the 1988, 1998, and 2003 MLO have declined in

purchasing power, equivalent to over $300 per student

� The 1988, 1998, and 2003 MLO are constant revenue sources

� Both inflation and increases in student enrollment have eroded the purchasing power associated with each MLO

� In total, purchasing power has eroded 39% from the respective per pupil levels in the years of approval

� State and local reductions have resulted in a combined reduction of greater than $1,100/student and greater than $24M

for district.

- 16 -

Key Observations

$297

$224

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

2004 2011

2003 MLO: $20M

$266

$168

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

1998 2011

1998 MLO: $17M

37% decline

25% decline

* Using 1998 dollars * Using 2003 dollars

$223

$86

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

1988 2011

1988 MLO: $12.1M

61% decline

* Using 1988 dollars

Current metro district bond redemption mills & mill levy overrides comparison

- 17 -

Bond

DistrictExisting

Mills

Northglenn 22.765

Brighton 18.325

Westminster 18.128

Douglas Co. 15.447

Aurora 15.000

Cherry Creek 12.700

Jefferson Co. 11.250

Sheridan 10.351

Littleton 8.244

Denver 7.958

Mapleton 6.879

Boulder 5.999

Mill Levy Override

DistrictExisting

Mills

Littleton 21.308

Northglenn 20.456

Cherry Creek 12.295

Jefferson Co. 10.664

Westminster 15.304

Aurora 12.178

Boulder 12.096

Sheridan 10.351

Mapleton 10.295

Denver 7.584

Douglas Co. 7.441

Brighton 0.097

Source: CDE 2011-12 Mill Levy Table

Total School Mills

District Mills*

Northglenn 70.276

Westminster 61.473

Littleton 57.530

Cherry Creek 54.367

Aurora 54.159

Douglas Co 48.788

Jefferson Co 48.721

Brighton 45.629

Boulder 44.843

Mapleton 43.740

Denver 42.265

Sheridan 38.764

*Includes the School Finance Act

Summary of CPAC

Recommendations

- 18 -

Summary of Identified Needs and CPAC Recommendation by Sub-Committee

- 19 -

CPAC Sub-Committee Evaluated Needs Recommendation

Facility Mgmt. $637 Million $222 Million

New Schools $310 Million $196 Million

Technology $80 Million $40 Million

Total Bond $1,027 Million $457 Million

Mill Levy $105 Million $49 Million

Prioritization Criteria for Maintenance Investments

- 20 -

Criteria

Safe or efficient operation of a facility

Replacing or repairing systems in imminent danger of failure

Improving the teaching and learning environment

Financially and environmentally sustainable

Regional equity and strengthening the district as a whole

Support the technological infrastructure

Visible and real improvements to our facilities

One-time capital projects

Facility Mgmt New Capacity Technology Mill Levy

Investment Summary: Facility Management Sub-Committee

- 21 -

($ Millions)Evaluated

Need Allocation Project Highlights

ADA & Code $38.2 $29.6Includes ADA projects required by Office of Civil Rights, elevator addition & system modernizations (required by updated code), numerous projects to bring buildings up to code compliance.

Electrical $36.3 $2.5Includes several projects to upgrade electrical outlets in classrooms and other electrical improvements at multiple sites.

Equipment $9.9 $2.6 Includes stage rigging safety improvements, elevator modernization.

Emily Griffith New Facility

$17.0 $17.0Incremental cost for new facility, beyond allocated maintenance funding and the cost reimbursement from selling the current facility.

Fire Systems $89.5 $35.4Includes 5 fire sprinkler projects, prioritized with DFD; 41 Fire Alarm and Detection system upgrades

Mechanical $218.1 $62.3Includes 32 boiler replacement projects, 85 phase II Cooling Solutions projects at schools without air conditioning.

Plumbing $13.0 $7.7Includes 12 hot water storage projects, art room sink replacements, swimming pool system upgrades

Renovation $95.3 $22.642 Science lab safety improvements, 118 technology (MDF) room cooling solutions, 2 Open Plan renovation solutions, HS restroom renovations.

Roofing & Windows $40.5 $16.5 211 roofing projects, many campuses have different types of roofing

Site Work $22.7 $2.5 All City Stadium parking lot and site drainage improvements

Water & Air Quality $74.2 $22.8 20 water quality projects and 8 air quality projects

Total $637.5 $221.5


Prioritization Criteria for New Capacity Investments

- 22 -

FirstCriterion: Supply & Demand

Regional Enrollment Growth Forecasted Capacity UtilizationData-Driven Approach

Second Criterion:

Commitments

Regional EquityBoard of Education

Commitments

Third Criterion:

Fiscal Responsibility

Capacity Solution with the Lowest Taxpayer Cost


Investment Summary: New Schools Capacity Sub-Committee

- 23 -

Project (in the order of priority from the sub-committee)BoE

DistrictClass Level

SeatsCreated

Estimate ($ M)

New elementary facility at Dunkirk in Green Valley Ranch 4 E-5 650 $18.0

New secondary facility at Evie Dennis Campus 4 6-12 500 $21.2

7 Cottages for small elementary capacity expansions across the district ALL E-5 850 $11.3

Whiteman addition to address development near Lowry 3 E-5 100 $1.8

Additional K-5 capacity to address residential growth in Lowry 3 E-5 150 $2.0

New elementary facility at Hampden Heights in SE 1 E-5 500 $21.3

Support utilization of available facility capacity including shared campuses ALL ALL 1,200 $13.5

New secondary facility at Northfield 4 6-12 900 $38.5

New early education facility located on Kepner / Lutheran campus 2 ECE 700 $6.3

Cottages / new facility for early education needs in West/NW Denver 5 ECE 350 $4.5

Cole/Mitchell renovation to accommodate E-12 campus 4 6-12 350 $4.2

Crofton minor facility expansion to accommodate existing program 4 E-5 150 $3.8

Slavens build-out for final phase to address common space deficiencies 1 E-8 175 $3.4

New secondary facility at Colorado Heights University In SW Denver 2 6-12 900 $13.8

Renovation of Byers MS for secondary use 3 6-12 900 $20.0

Expansion cottages for early education needs across the district ALL ECE 350 $7.0

Florence Crittenton remodel and capacity addition 2 6-12 TBD $5.0

TOTAL ~8,000 $195.6


Prioritization Criteria for Technology Investments

- 24 -

Pillars

Expected Outcomes

Alignment with Denver Plan

Magnitudeof Impact

Ability to Implement

Prior Investments

OperationalSavings

PreliminaryCost Estimates

2008 Bond

Grants GeneralFund

Infrastructure requirements to enable devices / software

Enabling 21st century skills in students

Supporting more efficient and effective instruction

Ensuring equity of access to technology across all schools

Support for improving student achievement

Enabling educator effectiveness

Improving parent involvement

Improved decision-making

Aligns with ISTE Essential Conditions


Category Investments Allocation

Ed

ucati

on

al

Tech

no

log

y � Investment in most critical and high priority projects to provide additional devices for student use, additional software tools, and improved data analysis capabilities

� Computer & Device funding directly to schools at $125 per student� Investment in Assistive Technology for Special Needs students� Investment in additional online assessment tools

$16.2M

Safe

ty &

S

ecu

rity

� Integrated access control (card reader installation) at 88 schools and 5 non school facilities

� Video surveillance replacement of approximately 575 analog cameras including data storage needs

$6.4M

Infr

astr

uctu

re � Significant wireless capacity improvements to support video streaming and “Bring your own device” models

� Increased cyber security � Critical infrastructure replacements with minor improvements needed to support

new systems

$12.2M

Op

era

tio

ns

Imp

rovem

en

t

� Interactive parent tools� Investment in high priority projects for human resources (infrastructure, recruiting,

principal effectiveness & teacher effectiveness support systems)� Employee collaboration and information sharing system

$5.1M

Total $39.9M

Investment Summary: Technology Sub-Committee

- 25 -


Prioritization Criteria for Mill Levy Investments

- 26 -

Lenses

Criteria

Focus Fundson the Classroom

Degree of Flexibilityas Landscape Evolves

Appeals to Voters

Advance student achievement, including closing the achievement gap and increasing graduation rates

Measurable benefit with metrics to track the impact

Supports the whole child with well-rounded supports

Provide students the tools to succeed in the 21st

century economy

Provide equity, so that students will receive the necessary resources they need to achieve the same

academic outcomes


Investment Summary: Mill Levy Sub-Committee

- 27 -

Investment Summary Revised

Enrichment & Student Supports

� Provide instructional support to students in grades 4, 6, 8� Student-Based-Budget allocation for Arts/Music in 6-12; PE/Engagement for K-12� Wrap-around services and counseling funding to sustain existing programs and

provide matching for philanthropic grants� Expand parent and community engagement specialists

$28M

Early Childhood Education / Kinder

� Offer full-day kindergarten to all students� Expand ECE to 850 additional students� Expand to highest-need regions while maintaining tuition structure� Address 50% of ECE/kinder revenue shortfall

$13M

Classroom Technology for 21st Century Learning

� Allocate per pupil funding towards device replacement� Provide per pupil funding for licensing and maintenance of classroom software

$4M

Rigorous, High-Quality Curricular Materials

� Update curriculum to meet new state standards� Support faster refresh cycles of materials

$4M

Total $49M


Consolidated

Regional Impact

- 28 -

Consolidated Impact of the Bond and Mill Levy by BoE District. Every

school in the district will directly benefit from both bond and mill levy funds.

- 29 -Source: 2011-12 student enrollment | 2010 census population

Note: Additional bond and mill levy investments are assigned to district-wide facilities and projects, and are not allocated to regions. Numbers shown above are estimates, and may change. “PP” refers to per pupil allocations.

Enrollment: 13,467 (17%)Population: 108,102 (18%)

Maintenance $80M*

New Capacity $5M

Technology $7M

Total Bond $92M $6,832 pp

Mill Levy $6.8M $502 pp


Maintenance $39M

New Capacity $25M

Technology $7M

Total Bond $71M $4,002pp



Maintenance $28M

New Capacity $25M

Technology $5M




Maintenance $21M

New Capacity $24M

Technology $6M




Maintenance $39M

New Capacity $86M

Technology $11M



* Includes Emily Griffith Technical College (EGTC) New Facility

Impact on Property

Tax Mills

- 30 -

Metro District Bond Redemption Mills & Mill Levy Overrides Comparison

If 2012 Ballot Initiatives Pass

- 31 -

Bond

DistrictExisting

Mills*Proposed

Bond

Northglenn 22.765

Brighton 18.325

Westminster 18.128

Douglas Co. 15.447

Aurora 15.000

Cherry Creek 12.700 $125M

Jefferson Co. 11.250 $99M

Denver 10.958 $457M

Sheridan 10.351

Littleton 8.244

Mapleton 6.879

Boulder 5.999

Mill Levy Override

DistrictExisting

Mills*Proposed

MLO

Littleton 21.308

Northglenn 20.456

Cherry Creek 18.295 $25M

Jefferson Co. 16.264 $39M

Westminster 15.304

Denver 12.484 $49M

Aurora 12.178

Boulder 12.096

Sheridan 10.351

Mapleton 10.295

Douglas Co. 7.441

Brighton 0.097


* Includes the proposed 2012 override* Forecasts an increase only to DPS mills, CC and Jeff Co. are TBD

Total School Mills (incl. SFA)

District Mills* $ / 100k

Northglenn 70.276 $559

Westminster 61.473 $489

Cherry Creek 61.367 $488

Littleton 57.530 $458

Aurora 54.159 $431

Jefferson Co 50.521 $402

Denver 50.265 $400

Douglas Co 48.788 $388

Brighton 45.629 $363

Boulder 44.843 $357

Mapleton 43.740 $348

Sheridan 38.764 $309

* Includes proposed 2012 MLO + DPS Bond

Metro Area Property Tax for Education (based on $225,000 typical residence)

- 32 -

$1,259

$1,101 $1,075$1,030

$970$905 $900

$874$817

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400Existing Tax

Proposed 2012 Impact

$757

$873

$974


* Based on the typical Denver residence, defined as a detached single family residence

Concluding CPAC

Recommendation

- 33 -

CPAC Recommendation to the Board of Education

� The CPAC recommends that the Board of Education place two initiatives on the November 2012 ballot for

voter consideration.

� The CPAC believes the package will positively impact student achievement, has broad voter appeal,

provides specificity on the areas of investment, while allowing some flexibility at the individual school and

district level as things change in the future, and achieves the following:

– Delivers essential programs and supports to advance achievement for students throughout the district. (i.e.. music,

art, physical education, enrichment, academic support, technology, curricular materials, kindergarten and preschool)

– Infuses 21st century technology throughout the district, impacting student learning, enhancing student and parent

access

– Addresses critical facility needs across schools and regions throughout the city

– Adds school capacity where most needed, to address overcrowding and enrollment growth.

� The CPAC encourages the Board and DPS staff to develop a formal oversight committee charged

with establishing accountability measures and a monitoring plan for expenditures of the bond and

mill levy override funds, and encourages community voice in that process.

- 34 -

Mill Levy Override General Obligation Bond

$49 Million $457 Million

Next Steps

- 35 -

�Monday, July 30 – Board Focus on Achievement Session –

Topic: Bond and Mill Levy Override Package

�Monday, August 13 – Board Work Session – Bond and Mill

Levy Override Review

�Thursday, August 16 – Board Regular Meeting, scheduled

vote for bond and mill levy ballot language

2012 Bond & Mill Levy Planning: Community Planning and ...€¦ · CPAC Mission and Stakeholder...

Documents

Transcript of 2012 Bond & Mill Levy Planning: Community Planning and ...€¦ · CPAC Mission and Stakeholder...