2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board...
-
Upload
bianca-pedder -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board...
![Page 1: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2012-2013 NJASK Test Results
and2011-2012
NJ School Performance Report
Presentation for the Board of Education
October 29, 2013
![Page 2: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview of 2013 NJ ASK 3-8 Content
The NJ ASK 3–8 initially designed to provide information about each
student’s achievement in the areas required by the NJ Core Curriculum Content Standards.
The NJ ASK 2013 was in a period of transition to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) English Language Arts (ELA) tests addressed these
standards 3-8Mathematics tests in grades 3–5
Grades 6–8 Mathematics tests and Grades 4 & 8 Science tests were still aligned with the NJ CCCS.
![Page 3: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2014 NJ ASK Administration
The 2014 NJ ASK LAL and Math grades 3 through 8 will test students on the Common Core State Standards as we
continue to prepare for the PARCC administration in 2014-2015
![Page 4: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
This report serves to summarize the Spring 2013 NJ ASK 3-8 test scores, including summary results that permit comparisons of district factor group
(DFG), and statewide data. This report also includes a three-year comparison of NJ ASK test
scores.
![Page 5: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
District Factor Group (DFG)District Factor Group (DFG)DFG results compare our children’s test results to similar
districts across the state in demographics, including similar socio-economic status and average level of education.
DFGs range from levels A – J. Sea Girt Borough has been identified as an “I” district.
Monmouth County DFG I Districts:
Avon Colts Neck Fair HavenHolmdel Marlboro MillstoneMonmouth Beach Sea Girt ShrewsburySpring Lake
Other Districts In DFG I Outside of Monmouth County
Madison Cranford PrincetonFranklin Lakes Summit WestfieldBerkeley Heights New Providence
Bridgewater-Raritan
![Page 6: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
BenchmarksBenchmarks
100-199 Partially Proficient
200-249 ProficientWorking at Grade Level in
Accordance to Standards
250-300 Advanced ProficientWorking at or Above Grade Level in
Accordance to Standards
![Page 7: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Score AnalysisScore Analysis
The Big Picture
![Page 8: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Language Arts Total ProficiencyLanguage Arts Total ProficiencyGrade Level
Percentage of General Education Students who
scored Proficient/Advanced
Proficient
Percentage of Total Population who
scored Proficient/Advanced
Proficient
3 91 85
4 100 92
5 100 100
6 93 94
7 95 90
8 100 95
Sea Girt
School Total
Population
Average of
93%
Proficient +
![Page 9: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Mathematics Total ProficiencyMathematics Total ProficiencyGrade Level
Percentage of General Education Students who
scored Proficient/Advanced
Proficient
Percentage of Total Population who
scored Proficient/Advanced
Proficient
3 100 92
4 100 92
5 100 100
6 80 81
7 95 90
8 100 85
Sea Girt School
Total Population
Average of
90%
Proficient +
Grade 6 outlier includes students educated outside of the district and students enrolled in the school for less than one year.
![Page 10: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Science Total ProficiencyScience Total Proficiency
Grade Level
Percentage of General Education Students who
scored Proficient/Advanced
Proficient
Percentage of Total Population who
scored Proficient/Advanced
Proficient
4 100 92
8 100 100
Sea Girt School
Total Population
Average of
96%
Proficient +
![Page 11: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Scale Score Mean: Language ArtsScale Score Mean: Language ArtsGradeLevel
Sea Girt Borough General Education Students
DFG “I” General Education Students
3 220 219
4 231 224
5 230 224
6 225 224
7 227 232
8 242 235
Sea Girt School
Mean Scores
Surpass the DFG
in 5 out of 6
grade levels in
Language Arts
![Page 12: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Scale Score Mean: MathematicsScale Score Mean: MathematicsGrade Sea Girt Borough
General Education Students
DFG “I” General Education Students
3 255 256
4 264 252
5 258 262
6 241 250
7 247 242
8 254 248
Sea Girt School
Mean Score
Surpassed the
DFG in 3 out of 6
grade levels in
Mathematics
![Page 13: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Scale Score Mean: ScienceScale Score Mean: Science
GradeLevel
Sea Girt Borough General Education Students
DFG General Education Students
4 263 259
8 247 251
![Page 14: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Language Arts: Language Arts: Area We Are Surpassing DFGArea We Are Surpassing DFG
Total Population Comparisons Total Population Comparisons Grade Level Partially
ProficientProficient Advanced
Proficient
SG DFG “I”
SG DFG “I”
SG DFG “I”
3 15.4 17.2 84.6 74.7 0 8.1
4 7.7 21.4 76.9 62.2 15.4 16.4
5 0 20.4 85.7 63 14.3 16.6
6 6.3 16 81 75 9.5 9
7 10 15.4 80 60.2 10 24.5
8 5 6.5 65 72.6 30 21
![Page 15: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Mathematics: Mathematics: Area We Are Surpassing DFGArea We Are Surpassing DFG
Total Population ComparisonsTotal Population ComparisonsGrade Level Partially
ProficientProficient Advanced
Proficient
SG DFG “I”
SG DFG “I”
SG DFG “I”
3 7.7 9.3 30.8 31.3 61.5 59.4
4 7.7 9.0 30.8 39.7 61.5 51.3
5 0 8.3 42.9 29.3 57.1 62.4
6 18.8 9.7 43.8 43 37.5 47.3
7 10 18.9 45 39.7 45 41.5
8 15 15.1 35 37.9 50 47
![Page 16: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Science: Science: Area We Are Surpassing DFGArea We Are Surpassing DFG
Total Population ComparisonsTotal Population ComparisonsGrade Level
Partially Proficient
Proficient Advanced Proficient
SG DFG “I”
SG DFG “I”
SG DFG “I”
4 7.7 3.2 23.1 34.3 69.2 62.5
8 0 7 50 41.4 50 51.6
![Page 17: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Grade 3 All time SG
High for AP in Math
and Surpasses DFG
and STATE 2 years
in a row!
Grade 4 All time SG High for AP in Math
and Surpasses DFG and STATE!
Grade 5 100% Of
Students Proficient/
Advanced Proficient
in ELA and Math!
Grade 6 All time SG High for AP in ELA
and Surpasses DFG and STATE!
Highlights From Three Year Comparison
![Page 18: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Grade 7 All time SG
High for AP in Math
and Surpasses DFG
and STATE!
Grade 8 Math and ELA Surpasses DFG and STATE for
AP 2 years in a row!
In 2013, 15% of the total
population of Sea Girt Elementary
students received a score at or near
300!
Highlights From Three Year Comparison (Continued)
![Page 19: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Goals - based on resultsGoals - based on results
CCSS Call For: Increased expository writing Increased exposure to and study of nonfiction
LiteracyEarlier identification of at risk students and implementing
intervention based on assessment through Fountas and Pinnell, Language Literacy Intervention
Identification of at risk students experiencing a specific area of weakness or language learning disability through implementation of Fundations
Continue to increase our teaching of content area reading and writing in both science and social studies
![Page 20: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Goals – based on resultsGoals – based on results
MathMaintaining the pace and challenge at each grade level
focusing on differentiated instruction
Implementing Common Core State Standards
Pre-High Math review of curriculum and course offerings in grades 7 & 8, building upon the good work we started for grade 6 in the spring of 2013.
![Page 21: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Where Do We Go From Here?
Increase data analysis to analyze specific strengths and weaknesses using multiple measures
Fine tune curriculum aligned with CCSS and raised instructional bar
Prepare for changes in testing from NJ ASK to National PARCC (Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers)
![Page 22: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Sea Girt Elementary School continues to
prepare students well beyond the state’s
average ability and expectations, and surpasses
DFG schools in out of 42 categories.
![Page 23: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Sea Girt Elementary SchoolNJ School Performance Report
2011-2012New Jersey School Performance Reports (NJSPR) for all schools in the state were released in March 2013. This report built upon and replaced the former School Report Card. The NJSPR includes brand new data on college and career readiness and provide comparison to “peer schools” in order to provide a more complete picture of school performance for educators and the general public.
Visit our website to view a copy of the School Performance Report at: http://www.seagirt.k12.nj.us
![Page 24: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
What is a Peer School?The peer school methodology compares schools to
approximately 30 similar “peer schools” from across the state with similar grade configurations and that are educating students with similar demographic characteristics such as free/reduced lunch eligibility, limited English proficiency or special education program participation.
Peer school data provides information about how similar
schools are performing to help identify strengths and areas for improvement.
Peer schools (single buildings in any district that are similar in demographics) are different from DFGs (whole districts that are identified by similar demographics).
![Page 25: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Areas Measured on NJ School Performance Report
Academic Achievement: SGES Scored 100%Language Arts Proficiency = 100%Mathematics Proficiency = 100%
College and Career Readiness: SGES Scored 50%% of Students enrolled in Algebra I = 100%% of Students w/ Chronic Absenteeism = 0%
The state has identified the acceptable benchmark is 6%.
SGES had 9% of students chronically absent.
Student Growth – Scored 100%Growth in Language Arts = 100%Growth in Mathematics = 100%
Sea Girt School Met
All of the Statewide
Targets Except for
Chronic
Absenteeism
Indicator
![Page 26: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
What is Chronic Absenteeism?
A chronically absent student is a student who was not present for any reason for more than 10% of the total days possible for that individual student.
10% of 180 days = 18 days therefore students absent more than 18 days are considered chronically absent.
9% of Sea Girt
Students were absent
for more than 18 days
last year
![Page 27: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
College and Career Readiness
Among the behaviors that research has shown to be indicative of success and college and career readiness are regularly attending school and challenging themselves with rigorous course work.
![Page 28: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Steps SGES Has Taken in Response to the NJSPRChronic Absenteeism:
Identified the families of students that were chronically absent last year and discussed
Implemented a monthly tracking and notification system of chronically absent students.
Informed families of the importance of school attendance and ways the school will partner with them to support their child’s attendance and well-being.
Algebra I Enrollment:Identify a means for increasing the percentage of students on
track for enrollment in Algebra in Gr. 7 or 8Build upon the more rigorous grade 6 program that was
implemented for this school year by aligning our Gr. 7&8 curriculum to the CCSS and review adjusting /expanding course offerings.
![Page 29: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
SGES Remains Committed to Excellence
Administration, teachers and support staff are committed to our students’ high achievement and to a well-rounded education.
There is always good work to be done to ensure that our students are achieving at the highest level. We embrace the challenge.
NJ was recently ranked #3 in the nation, behind Massachusetts and Michigan, for performance in Mathematics and Science. Sea Girt remains as a top performing school district in the state of NJ.
![Page 30: 2012-2013 NJASK Test Results and 2011-2012 NJ School Performance Report Presentation for the Board of Education October 29, 2013.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013100/551aaeaa550346e0158b6160/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Contact Us
To learn more about our performance and programs, you are encouraged to contact our school administration or teachers.
Link to our staff contact information: http://www.seagirt.k12.nj.us
Sea Girt is a very special place for children to live and learn and we are honored to have a hand in developing our students.