2011/12/02 STP COL - FW: Section 3.7 & 3.8 Actions ...
31
1 PMSTPCOL PEmails From: Wunder, George Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 9:52 AM To: STPCOL Subject: FW: Section 3.7 & 3.8 Actions - Updated December 1, 2011 Attachments: 3.7 & 3.8 Punch List 120111.pdf; Approach - Site Personnel Dose 120111.pdf From: Price, John E [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 9:08 AM To: Tai, Tom Cc: Thomas, Brian; Chakrabarti, Samir; Chakravorty, Manas; Joseph, Stacy; Wunder, George; Thomas, Steven; Head, Scott; Mookhoek, William; Dujka, David; Hinson, Charles; Eudy, Michael; Bense, Richard Subject: Section 3.7 & 3.8 Actions - Updated December 1, 2011 Tom, The attached document, 3.7 & 3.8 Punch List 120111, provides scope and status for all known actions required for FSAR Sections 3.7 and 3.8. This document will be used on our weekly telephone conference. The next call is scheduled for Wednesday, December 7, 2011. The attachment contains the following: • Sheets 1 through 15, dated December 1, 2011, show the status of actions for FSAR Sections 3.7 and 3.8. • Sheets 16 through 27, dated October 7, 2011, address Clarification Issues provided by NRC. Only two Punch List Items remain open. Recent and current actions include: • RAIs 03.07.01-29 S1, 03.08.04-30 S7, 03.08.04-34 S2, and 03.08.01-11 were issued to NRC on 11/14/2011 or 11/17/2011. • RAIs 03.07.01-29 S1 R1, 03.07.01-30, 03.07.02-13 S3, and 03.07.02-13 S4 were issued to NRC on 11/23/2011. • Two remaining RAIs, 03.07.02-32 R1 and 03.07.01-29 S2, are scheduled for issue to NRC by 12/21/2011. These two RAIs will close the remaining open Punch List Items (129 and 149). Note that two items are not resolved and further discussion is needed during the phone call: • Punch List Item 125 was closed on 09/12/2011 when RAI 03.08.04-37 was issued. This item, related to the Radwaste Building classification, is still under review by the NRC. In response to a question last week by the Staff, attached is a file Approach- Site Personnel
Transcript of 2011/12/02 STP COL - FW: Section 3.7 & 3.8 Actions ...
1
PMSTPCOL PEmails
From: Wunder, GeorgeSent: Friday, December 02, 2011 9:52 AMTo: STPCOLSubject: FW: Section 3.7 & 3.8 Actions - Updated December 1, 2011Attachments: 3.7 & 3.8 Punch List 120111.pdf; Approach - Site Personnel Dose 120111.pdf
From: Price, John E [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 9:08 AM To: Tai, Tom Cc: Thomas, Brian; Chakrabarti, Samir; Chakravorty, Manas; Joseph, Stacy; Wunder, George; Thomas, Steven; Head, Scott; Mookhoek, William; Dujka, David; Hinson, Charles; Eudy, Michael; Bense, Richard Subject: Section 3.7 & 3.8 Actions - Updated December 1, 2011
Tom,
The attached document, 3.7 & 3.8 Punch List 120111, provides scope and status for all known actions required for FSAR Sections 3.7 and 3.8. This document will be used on our weekly telephone conference. The next call is scheduled for Wednesday, December 7, 2011.
The attachment contains the following:
• Sheets 1 through 15, dated December 1, 2011, show the status of actions for FSAR Sections 3.7 and 3.8.
• Sheets 16 through 27, dated October 7, 2011, address Clarification Issues provided by NRC.
Only two Punch List Items remain open. Recent and current actions include:
• RAIs 03.07.01-29 S1, 03.08.04-30 S7, 03.08.04-34 S2, and 03.08.01-11 were issued to NRC on 11/14/2011 or 11/17/2011.
• RAIs 03.07.01-29 S1 R1, 03.07.01-30, 03.07.02-13 S3, and 03.07.02-13 S4 were issued to NRC on 11/23/2011.
• Two remaining RAIs, 03.07.02-32 R1 and 03.07.01-29 S2, are scheduled for issue to NRC by 12/21/2011. These two RAIs will close the remaining open Punch List Items (129 and 149).
Note that two items are not resolved and further discussion is needed during the phone call:
• Punch List Item 125 was closed on 09/12/2011 when RAI 03.08.04-37 was issued. This item, related to the Radwaste Building classification, is still under review by the NRC. In response to a question last week by the Staff, attached is a file Approach- Site Personnel
2
Dose 120111 addressing NINAs recommended approach to resolve this issue. Concurrence with this approach is needed on Wednesday to ensure that the calculation can be performed in a timeframe to support the schedule.
• A potential NRC request to revise the Hurricane parameters in Chapter 2, which could then require further revision to Section 3.8.
NRC has confirmed that a “Final” Audit for COLA Chapters 3.7 and 3.8 will be held the week of January 9, 2012 in the S&L Office in Chicago.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or clarifications. Regards,
John E. Price
Licensing Engineer - STP Units 3 & 4
972.754.8221 (cell)
Hearing Identifier: SouthTexas34Public_EX Email Number: 3218 Mail Envelope Properties (DAC719623E968245BD52D03696111100906242EF4B) Subject: FW: Section 3.7 & 3.8 Actions - Updated December 1, 2011 Sent Date: 12/2/2011 9:51:45 AM Received Date: 12/2/2011 9:51:47 AM From: Wunder, George Created By: [email protected] Recipients: "STPCOL" <[email protected]> Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2436 12/2/2011 9:51:47 AM 3.7 & 3.8 Punch List 120111.pdf 136640 Approach - Site Personnel Dose 120111.pdf 16990 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
1M
esh
sens
itivi
ty
Rev
iew
ed d
urin
g M
arch
Aud
it
03.0
7.02
-25,
R1
03.0
7.02
-29,
R1
03.0
7.02
-22
3/15
/11
May
Aud
it3.
7 - D
.
203
.07.
02-2
83/
15/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- D.
3N
/AP
rovi
de IT
AA
C to
clo
se 1
0CFR
21 is
sue
rela
ted
to d
ynam
ic a
naly
sis
of th
e Tu
rbin
e B
uild
ing
03.0
7.02
-31
3/28
/11
May
Aud
it3.
7 - D
.
4
Site
Spe
cific
Sei
smic
Ana
lyse
s of
Rad
was
te B
uild
ing
• A
mpl
ified
inpu
t mot
ion
c
onsi
derin
g th
e ef
fect
of n
earb
y
Rea
ctor
Bui
ldin
g •
Fix
ed b
ase
seis
mic
ana
lysi
s fo
r
det
erm
inat
ion
of s
eism
ic S
SE
fo
rces
for I
I/I d
esig
n
Not
Aud
ited
by N
RC
NR
C C
ompl
ete
Aud
it
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - C
. 13.
13.
8 - C
. 13.
2
53.
7-1
NR
C w
ould
like
to h
ave
an IT
AA
C fo
r II/I
des
ign
in a
dditi
on to
the
curr
ent d
iscu
ssio
ns
in C
OLA
, RA
I 03.
07.0
2-20
03.0
7.02
-20
S14/
13/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- D.
63.
7-3
Che
ck R
SW
Pip
ing
Tunn
el S
SI a
naly
sis
desc
riptio
n to
see
if it
fully
des
crib
es h
ow th
e m
otio
n at
var
ious
poi
nts
of tu
nnel
wer
e ad
dres
sed
and/
or a
mpl
ified
03.0
7.01
-27
S35/
17/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- D.
73.
7-4
Che
ck D
GFO
S V
AU
LT S
SI a
naly
sis
desc
riptio
n to
see
if it
fully
des
crib
es h
ow th
e m
otio
n at
var
ious
poi
nts
of v
ault
wer
e ad
dres
sed/
ampl
ified
Pro
vide
add
ition
al d
escr
iptio
n in
CO
LA, a
s ne
eded
. See
Item
3.7
-22
03.0
7.01
-27
S35/
17/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- D.
89
In D
GFO
SV
cal
cuat
ion
for S
SI a
naly
sis,
U7-
CA
LC-D
SN
-600
1, R
ev. B
, the
refin
ed
mod
el s
pect
ra v
alue
s ar
e 14
.6%
hig
her a
t 3.8
Hz.
than
thos
e in
the
base
mod
el.
The
appl
ican
t is
requ
este
d to
pro
vide
just
ifica
tion
for r
econ
cilin
g th
is d
iffer
ence
.
Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
9, N
o fu
rther
act
ion,
ans
wer
ed o
n a
prev
ious
RA
I
03.0
7.01
-27
S1 R
13/
7/11
May
Aud
it3.
7 - D
.
93.
7-5
Che
ck D
GFO
S T
UN
NE
L S
SI a
naly
sis
desc
riptio
n to
see
if it
fully
des
crib
es h
ow th
e m
otio
n at
var
ious
poi
nts
of tu
nnel
wer
e ad
dres
sed
and/
or a
mpl
ified
.
Pro
vide
add
ition
al d
escr
iptio
n in
CO
LA, a
s ne
eded
. See
Item
3.7
-22
03.0
7.01
-27
S35/
17/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- D.
103.
7-6
2
Iden
tify
soil
case
s us
ed fo
r all
SS
SI a
naly
sis,
and
pro
vide
bas
is.
As
a m
inim
um fo
r All
SS
SI a
nlay
sis
uppe
rbou
nd a
nd u
pper
boun
d ba
ckfil
l sho
uld
be
cons
ider
ed. R
evie
w C
OLA
mar
kup
for c
onsi
sten
cy w
ith s
oil c
ases
ana
lyze
d.
03.0
7.01
-27
S35/
17/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- F. f
.
113.
7-8
2
Why
for S
SS
I of R
SW
Tun
nel w
as U
B in
situ
use
d vs
UB
bac
kfill
soi
l
As
a m
inim
um fo
r All
SS
SI a
nlay
sis
uppe
rbou
nd a
nd u
pper
boun
d ba
ckfil
l sho
uld
be
cons
ider
ed. R
evie
w C
OLA
mar
kup
for c
onsi
sten
cy w
ith s
oil c
ases
ana
lyze
d.
03.0
7.01
-27
S35/
17/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- F. f
.
123.
7-36
2C
onfir
m th
at a
s a
min
imum
for A
ll S
SS
I anl
aysi
s up
perb
ound
in-s
itu a
nd u
pper
boun
d ba
ckfil
l sho
uld
be c
onsi
dere
d. P
rovi
de a
dditi
onal
info
rmat
ion
in R
AI r
espo
nse
as
appr
opria
te03
.07.
01-2
7 S3
5/17
/11
May
Aud
it3.
7 - F
. f.
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
1 of
27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
133.
7-7
1
Rev
ise
App
endi
x 3A
and
3H
.6 to
reco
ncile
gro
und
wat
er e
leva
tion
with
Cha
pter
2
Dem
onst
rate
that
soi
l spr
ings
val
ues
due
to g
roun
dwat
er e
leva
tion
reco
ncili
atio
n do
no
t affe
ct fo
unda
tion
desi
gn
Dem
onst
rate
that
cal
cula
ted
gap
valu
es a
re n
ot a
ffect
ed b
y du
e to
gro
undw
ater
el
evat
ion
reco
ncili
atio
n fo
r set
tlem
ent a
naly
sis
03.0
7.01
-27
S35/
17/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- F. g
.
143
Cle
arly
des
crib
ing
in th
e FS
AR
how
sei
smic
dem
and
for n
on-s
eism
ic II
/I st
ruct
ures
for
stab
ility
eva
luat
ion
is d
eter
min
edS
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
n03
.07.
02-1
3 S3
7/28
/11
153.
7-10
Cla
rify
SS
SI s
oil p
ress
ures
in C
OLA
figu
res
to in
dica
te th
at th
ey re
pres
ent e
nvel
ope
of a
ll so
il ca
ses
anal
yzed
03.0
7.01
-27
S35/
17/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- D.
163.
7-11
Incl
ude
in F
SA
R th
e fo
llow
ing
info
rmat
ion
for t
he ti
me
hist
orie
s de
velo
ped
for 0
.3g,
1.
60 R
eg. G
uide
spe
ctru
m:
1) D
evel
opm
ent m
etho
d by
refe
renc
e to
DC
D;
2) P
lots
of t
hree
acc
eler
atio
n tim
e hi
stor
ies;
3) C
ompa
rison
of 5
% re
spon
se s
pect
ra
03.0
7.01
-2 S
24/
13/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- D.
173.
7-15
Freq
uenc
y/ac
cele
ratio
n ev
alua
tion
for U
HS
col
umns
with
and
with
out h
ydro
dyna
mic
m
ass
Det
erm
ine
colu
mn
acce
lera
tions
for c
olum
n m
ass
and
hydr
odyn
amic
mas
s ba
sed
on
colu
mn
frequ
ency
and
spe
ctra
at t
op a
nd b
otto
m o
f the
col
umns
and
revi
se R
AI
03.0
8.04
-30
supp
lem
ent 1
to re
port
new
info
rmat
ion
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
8.04
-30
S46/
30/1
1
183.
7-18
Effe
ct o
f stru
ctur
al m
esh
refin
emen
t on
max
imum
acc
eler
atio
n fo
r des
ign
In th
e m
anua
l cal
cula
tion
for d
esig
n of
PH
Roo
f sla
b, in
crea
se th
e ve
rtica
l sei
smc
load
for P
H R
oof b
ased
on
exam
inat
ion
of s
truct
ural
mes
h se
nsiti
vity
resu
lts
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
8.04
-30
S46/
30/1
1
193.
7-2
Det
erm
ine
if FS
AR
(App
endi
x 3C
) rev
isio
n is
requ
ired
for t
he u
se o
f com
pute
r pr
ogra
ms
used
by
Wes
tingh
ouse
Will
pro
vide
info
rmat
ion
in C
OLA
03.0
7.01
-2 S
24/
13/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- D.
207
Just
ify c
ompa
rison
of S
AP
2000
to A
NS
YS
03.0
7.02
-29
S15/
10/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- E.
213.
7-28
6
SA
SS
I Val
idat
ion
- Run
asp
ect r
atio
pro
blem
with
redu
ced
shea
r wav
e ve
loci
ty in
ve
rtica
l dire
ctio
n an
d ge
t tra
nsfe
r fun
ctio
n at
the
cent
er o
f the
sla
b
S&
L to
revi
se th
e S
AS
SI2
000
test
pro
blem
for t
wo
way
sla
b ac
tion
to m
atch
that
by
SG
H.
Add
a c
autio
nary
not
e to
SA
SS
I200
0 re
leas
e m
emo
for u
sers
to e
xam
ine
trans
fer
func
tions
for a
ny s
ign
of in
stab
ility
03.0
7.02
-29
S15/
10/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- E.
223.
7-19
Pro
vide
a fi
gure
in C
OLA
sho
win
g 0.
3g R
eg. G
uide
1.6
0 sp
ectra
env
elop
es a
mpl
ified
m
otio
ns fo
r all
thre
e st
ora g
e va
ults
03.0
7.01
-27
S35/
17/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- D.
233.
7-22
Incl
ude
ampl
ified
site
-spe
cific
spe
ctra
for R
SW
Pip
ing
Tunn
el, D
GFO
SV
, and
DG
FO
Tunn
el in
FS
AR
03.0
7.01
-27
S35/
17/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- D.
243.
7-26
Con
firm
that
DG
FO ta
nk ri
gidt
y re
quire
men
t is
incl
uded
in th
e pr
ocur
emen
t sp
ecifi
catio
nN
/AN
/AM
ay A
udit
3.7
- F. h
.
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
2 of
27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
253.
7-27
Con
solid
ate
all 0
3.07
.01-
27 re
spon
ses.
Als
o in
clud
e th
e sp
ectra
com
paris
ons
for
wha
t was
don
e in
the
audi
t for
cra
cked
con
cret
e ca
ses.
With
read
er's
gui
de p
rovi
ded,
ther
e is
no
need
to c
onso
lidat
e 3.
7.1-
27.
Spe
ctra
co
mpa
rison
s w
ill b
e pr
ovid
ed.
03.0
7.01
-27
S35/
17/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- D.
263.
7-28
6S
AS
SI V
alid
atio
n - R
un a
spec
t rat
io p
robl
em w
ith re
duce
d sh
ear w
ave
velo
city
in
verti
cal d
irect
ion
and
get t
rans
fer f
unct
ion
at th
e ce
nter
of t
he s
lab
03.0
7.02
-29
S15/
10/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.7
- E.
273.
7-33
8
For E
s us
e th
e S
SS
I pre
ssur
e di
agra
m a
s th
e dr
ivin
g fo
rce
in th
e st
abili
ty e
valu
atio
n an
d us
ing
pass
ive
on th
e re
sist
ing
side
for F
OS
Vau
lt, R
SW
Pip
ing
Tunn
el, F
OS
Tu
nnel
Pro
vide
requ
este
d in
form
atio
n in
RA
I res
pons
e
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.02
-13
S411
/23/
11
283.
7-35
8
Con
firm
for F
OS
Vau
lt th
at E
' is
mor
e th
an th
e in
ertia
l for
ce fo
r am
plifi
ed s
ite-s
peci
fic
SS
I ana
lysi
s in
the
stab
ility
eva
luat
ion
Pro
vide
requ
este
d in
form
atio
n in
RA
I res
pons
e
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.02
-13
S411
/23/
11
29P
erfo
rm s
ensi
tivity
ana
lysi
s re
late
d to
Poi
sson
's R
atio
NR
CN
/AN
/AM
ay A
udit
3.7
3013
Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
13
For t
he R
adw
aste
Bui
ldin
g, p
rovi
de a
dditi
onal
info
rmat
ion
and/
or ju
stifi
catio
n fo
r the
fo
llow
ing:
1. D
esig
n an
d A
naly
sis
(3H
.3.5
.1 &
2)
2. II
/I A
naly
sis
and
desi
gn (3
H.3
.5.3
)3.
Loa
d C
ombi
natio
n fo
r She
ar (S
teel
) (3H
.3.4
.3.4
.2)
4. U
ltim
ate
soil
bear
ing
capa
city
(3H
.3.4
.2.1
)5.
Tor
nado
Par
amet
ers
(3H
.3.B
& 3
H.3
.4.3
.3.1
)6.
Flo
od D
esig
n (3
H.3
.4.2
.3)
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - C
. 13.
Pun
ch L
ist 9
2
31R
evie
wed
dur
ing
Mar
ch A
udit
03.0
8.04
-18
3/15
/11
May
Aud
it3.
8 - C
. 13.
2
Pun
ch L
ist 9
2
32R
evie
wed
dur
ing
Mar
ch A
udit
03.0
8.04
-18
R1
S23/
15/1
1
May
Aud
it3.
8 - C
. 13.
4
Pun
ch L
ist 9
2
33
Des
ign
of D
GFO
T in
clud
ing
desi
gn c
onsi
dera
tions
for s
eism
ic w
ave
prop
agat
ion
• D
esig
n in
puts
• S
truct
ural
ana
lysi
s m
odel
• D
esig
n of
wal
ls, f
loor
s, fo
unda
tions
,
an
d ot
her s
truct
ural
com
pone
nts
• S
tabi
lity
eval
uatio
n
Not
Aud
ited
by N
RC
in M
arch
Aud
it
03.0
8.04
-30
S13/
15/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.8
- H.
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
3 of
27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
34
Des
ign
of U
HS
/RS
W P
umph
ouse
•
Des
ign
inpu
ts •
Stru
ctur
al a
naly
sis
mod
el •
Des
ign
of w
alls
, flo
ors,
foun
datio
ns,
a
nd o
ther
stru
ctur
al c
ompo
nent
s •
Sta
bilit
y ev
alua
tion
Not
Aud
ited
by N
RC
in M
arch
Aud
it
03.0
8.04
-30
S13/
15/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.8
- A.
35
Dur
ing
the
audi
t hel
d on
Oct
ober
18
thro
ugh
22, 2
010,
the
staf
f not
ed th
at th
e ap
plic
ant d
id n
ot in
clud
e fo
unda
tion
bear
ing
pres
sure
cal
cula
tions
for w
ind
and
torn
ado
load
ings
for U
HS
/PH
The
appl
ican
t agr
eed
to in
clud
e th
e be
arin
g pr
essu
re e
valu
atio
ns fo
r win
d an
d to
rnad
o in
its
calc
ulat
ions
(CA
LC-E
OR
A-0
20, “
Dyn
amic
Bea
ring
Cap
acity
Ana
lysi
s fo
r th
e U
HS
Bas
in a
nd R
SW
Pum
p H
ouse
und
er W
ind
and
Torn
ado
Load
ing”
, Rev
isio
n 0)
for t
he U
HS
/PH
acc
ordi
ngly
.
MA
CTE
CR
ob S
mith
CA
LC-E
OR
A-0
20,
Rev
isio
n 0
3/12
/11
May
Aud
it3.
8 - A
.
3614
Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
14
For a
ll S
ite-S
peci
fic C
ateg
ory
I Stru
ctur
es, p
rovi
de a
dditi
onal
info
rmat
ion
and/
or
just
ifica
tion
for e
xtre
me
win
d an
d to
rnad
o lo
adin
g (3
H.6
.4.3
.2)
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - C
. 14.
Pun
ch L
ist 7
4
373.
8-1
RA
I 03.
08.0
1-9
+/- 2
5% o
f the
gap
: How
doe
s th
is c
ompa
re to
long
term
set
tlem
ent v
alue
s? C
larif
y if
25%
mov
emen
t env
elop
es lo
ng te
rm s
ettle
men
t.
The
25%
mov
emen
t env
elop
s th
e ex
pect
ed lo
ng te
rm s
ettle
men
t at t
he R
B/C
B
inte
rface
, bel
ow fl
ood
leve
l
Rev
ise
resp
onse
to R
AI 0
3.04
.02-
6 &
03.
08.0
1-9
to re
quire
the
test
ing
to b
e th
e m
axim
um o
f +/-
25%
or l
ong
term
set
tlem
ent.
03.0
8.01
-9 S
14/
13/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.8
- E.
383.
8-2
For S
ectio
n 3H
.6-7
in R
AI 0
3.08
.04-
17, S
uppl
emen
t 1, p
rovi
de c
larif
icat
ion
for l
ast l
ine
of th
e fir
st p
arag
raph
.
(Cla
rify
that
env
elop
of S
SS
I pre
ssur
e an
d A
SC
E 4
-98
is u
sed.
)
Rev
ise
resp
onse
to R
AI 0
3.08
.04-
17 S
uppl
emen
t 1 to
cla
rify
that
the
enve
lop
is u
sed.
03.0
8.04
-17
S14/
26/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.8
- E.
393.
8-3
11
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-28
Bul
let 4
: Sho
w th
e ba
sis
for r
educ
tions
in th
e dy
nam
ic re
sist
ance
coe
ffici
ents
(Par
t C
of q
uest
ion)
.
Exp
lain
in re
vise
d re
spon
se to
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-28
how
val
ues
wer
e de
term
ined
(fro
m
MA
CTE
C c
alcu
latio
n)
Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
11A
pplic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to p
rovi
de a
com
paris
on b
etw
een
the
stra
in ra
nges
ass
umed
in
the
abov
e re
fere
nce
and
the
stra
in v
alue
s ex
pect
ed b
enea
th th
e fo
unda
tion
of C
at I
build
ings
of U
nits
3&
4.
03.0
8.04
-28
S14/
26/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.8
- E.
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
4 of
27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
403.
8-5
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-32
NR
C to
com
pare
resp
onse
to o
ther
app
lican
t res
pons
es.
N/A
N/A
Per
6/1
/11
Tele
con
413.
8-6
RA
I 03.
08.0
1-7,
Rev
. 2
Rev
iew
resp
onse
- sh
ould
the
pres
sure
load
ing
be b
ased
on
a flo
od h
eigh
t of 8
' vs.
7'
?
The
pres
sure
load
ing
shou
ld b
e ba
sed
on a
hei
ght o
f 8',
but t
his
does
not
cha
nge
the
resu
lt.
Rev
ise
resp
onse
to R
AI 0
3.08
.01-
7 an
d re
late
d re
spon
ses
to c
larif
y th
is.
03.0
8.01
-7 S
14/
13/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.8
- E.
423.
8-7
Doc
ket t
he d
esig
n pa
ram
eter
s ta
ble
(Age
nda
Item
A)
N/A
4/18
/11
May
Aud
it3.
8 - B
. 1.
Pun
ch L
ist 7
5
433.
8-8
4 5
Con
cret
e an
d co
ncre
te to
wat
erpr
oofin
g fri
ctio
n co
effic
ient
of 0
.6 is
bas
ed o
n st
atic
, bu
t soi
l coe
ffici
ent o
f 0.4
7 is
bas
ed o
n dy
nam
ic.
Rev
ise
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-28
or 0
3.08
.04-
19 to
sho
w re
vise
d re
quire
d st
atic
coe
ffici
ent o
f fri
ctio
n of
con
cret
e an
d m
embr
ane
incr
ease
d to
� 0
.75
Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
4D
esig
nate
whe
ther
the
frict
ion
coef
ficie
nts
repo
rted
in T
able
3H
.6-1
4 ar
e st
atic
or
dyna
mic
coe
ffici
ent o
f fric
tion
valu
es. (
Rev
ise
resp
onse
to R
AI 3
.7.2
-13
S1)
Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
5 (N
o ac
tion
requ
ired)
03.0
8.04
-19
S103
.07.
02-1
3 S2
4/26
/11
May
Aud
it3.
8 - B
. 2.
3.8
- C. 4
.
4416
Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
16
Pro
vide
add
ition
al in
form
atio
n an
d/or
just
ifica
tion
for s
peci
fied
min
imum
sta
tic
coef
ficie
nt o
f fric
tion
at th
e va
rious
inte
rface
s, s
peci
fical
ly a
t the
wat
erpr
oofin
g m
embr
ane.
Als
o, th
e re
quire
men
t of i
nten
tiona
lly ro
ughe
ning
the
conc
rete
sur
face
sh
ould
be
incl
uded
in th
e FS
AR
.
Ref
er to
Act
ion
Item
3.8
-29
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - C
. 16.
Pun
ch L
ist 7
7
453.
8-9
S&
L to
eva
luat
e m
etho
d of
reco
ncili
atio
n fo
r soi
l pre
ssur
e fro
m e
quiv
alen
t pre
ssur
e m
etho
d fo
r bea
ring
pres
sure
eva
luat
ion
and
soil
pres
sure
from
fini
te e
lem
ent a
naly
sis.
Form
ally
pro
vide
the
prop
osed
reco
ncili
atio
n m
etho
d in
resp
onse
to R
AI 3
.8.4
-35.
03.0
8.04
-35
4/11
/11
May
Aud
it3.
8 - B
. 3.
463.
8-9
S&
L to
per
form
the
reco
ncili
atio
n ev
alua
tion
Form
ally
pro
vide
the
prop
osed
reco
ncili
atio
n m
etho
d in
resp
onse
to R
AI 3
.8.4
-35.
Ref
er to
Act
ion
Item
3.8
-38
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - B
. 3.
3.8
- C. 1
5.
Pun
ch L
ist 9
3
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
5 of
27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
4715
Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
15
Pro
vide
add
ition
al in
form
atio
n an
d/or
just
ifica
tion
for f
ound
atio
n be
arin
g pr
essu
res
reco
ncili
atio
n.
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - B
. 3.
3.8
- C. 1
5.
Pun
ch L
ist 9
3
483.
8-11
Rev
iew
the
win
d lo
adin
g us
ed fo
r des
ign
and
stab
ilty
calc
ulat
ions
for t
he v
ault.
NR
C to
revi
ew th
e ju
stifi
catio
n fo
r the
impo
rtanc
e fa
ctor
for w
ind
pres
sure
cal
cula
tion
prov
ided
in re
spon
se to
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-30
Sup
plem
ent 1
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - B
. 4.
Pun
ch L
ist 7
4
493.
8-12
Dis
cuss
with
Joh
n P
rice
deliv
ery
of th
e R
evie
wer
's G
uide
to N
RC
N/A
4/8/
11M
ay A
udit
3.8
- E.
5017
Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
17
Mis
cella
neou
s Q
uest
ions
from
Aud
it an
d R
evie
wer
s G
uide
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - C
. 17.
Pun
ch L
ist 7
5, 7
8, 7
9,
80 &
81
513.
8-15
DG
FOS
V d
esig
n ca
lcul
atio
n: C
onfir
m th
e to
rnad
o w
ind
load
use
d in
des
ign,
pg.
26
Rev
ise
desi
gn p
aram
eter
s ta
ble
(See
Item
3.8
-7).
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - E
.
523.
8-16
DG
FOS
V d
esig
n ca
lcul
atio
n: V
erify
acc
eler
atio
n va
lues
on
pg. 1
13 w
ith A
ttach
men
t B
Det
erm
ine
the
late
st re
visi
on o
f the
SS
I cal
cula
tion.
Ref
. 7.1
9 (d
esig
n) v
s 7.
30
(sta
bilit
y).
B is
the
corr
ect r
evis
ion;
refe
renc
e in
sta
bilit
y ca
lcul
atio
n w
ill b
e re
vise
d in
the
calc
ulat
ion.
(PIP
201
1-03
65)
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - E
.
5310
As
both
, the
SA
SS
I and
the
SA
P m
odel
s, s
houl
d be
bas
ed o
n th
e sa
me
geom
etry
an
d to
tal w
eigh
t and
are
sub
ject
to th
e sa
me
abso
lute
acc
eler
atio
ns, i
t is
not a
ppar
ent
why
an
addi
tiona
l, re
lativ
ely
larg
e am
plifi
catio
n w
ould
be
need
ed in
ver
tical
dire
ctio
n to
obt
ain
com
para
ble
tota
l bas
e se
ism
ic lo
ads.
The
refo
re, t
he a
pplic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to p
rovi
de a
just
ifica
tion
rega
rdin
g th
e di
ffere
nt b
ehav
ior o
f bot
h st
ruct
ural
mod
els.
03.0
8.04
-30
S25/
17/1
1M
ay A
udit
3.8
- C. 1
0.
543.
8-20
Use
of n
ewer
ver
sion
of A
CI-3
49 &
AS
ME
Sec
tion
III, D
ivis
ion
2 C
odes
, Res
pond
to
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-36
03.0
8.04
-36
4/11
/11
May
Aud
it3.
8 - E
.
553.
8-21
Bea
m s
hear
dis
cuss
ion
Com
mitm
ent t
o in
corp
orat
e N
RC
feed
back
will
be
prov
ided
in a
n R
AI R
espo
nse
03.0
8.04
-34
4/11
/11
May
Aud
it3.
8 - E
.
563.
8-21
Bea
m s
hear
dis
cuss
ion
Cal
cula
tions
will
be
revi
sed
and
FSA
R ta
bles
will
be
upda
ted
as a
Con
firm
ator
y A
ctio
nC
OLA
upd
ates
refle
ctin
g th
e re
sults
of t
he h
ydro
dyna
mic
mas
s ef
fect
on
the
colu
mns
w
ill b
e in
clud
ed in
this
resp
onse
(Pun
ch L
ist N
o. 1
7)
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
8.04
-34
S1(A
ll bu
t RW
B &
DG
FOSV
)9/
12/1
1
573.
8-22
Atta
ch S
uppl
emen
t to
the
rele
ase
mem
o fo
r SA
FE (r
egar
ding
she
ar)
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - B
. 6.
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
6 of
27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
58
Aud
it R
epor
t 3.8
K. C
ompu
ter S
oftw
are
Val
idat
ion
and
Ver
ifica
tion,
PC
AC
OLU
MN
, V
ersi
on 4
.10
AC
I 349
-97
used
in S
TP 3
&4
desi
gn is
not
cov
ered
by
this
V&
V, h
owev
er it
was
as
sure
d th
at re
sults
from
PC
AC
olum
n ar
e ev
alua
ted
in th
e ca
lcs
agai
nst t
he s
peci
al
code
requ
irem
ents
in A
CI 3
49-9
7. T
he s
taff
need
s to
revi
ew in
furth
er d
etai
l how
this
as
sura
nce
is im
plem
ente
d. T
his
will
be
incl
uded
in th
e ne
xt a
udit.
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8
593.
8-23
Ver
ify th
at 0
.21
g us
ed in
the
basi
c de
sign
of R
SW
Tun
nel e
nvel
opes
the
seis
mic
ac
cele
ratio
ns
Pro
vide
d S
GH
cal
cula
tion
show
ing
whe
re th
e en
velo
ping
acc
eler
atio
ns c
ame
from
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - B
. 7.
3.8
- C. 1
2.
Pun
ch L
ist 8
2
603.
8-24
RS
W T
unne
l: C
onfir
m th
at s
oil p
ress
ures
con
side
r add
ition
al w
ave
prop
agat
ion
effe
ct
Cal
cula
tion
will
be
revi
sed
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - B
. 7.
3.8
- C. 1
2.
Pun
ch L
ist 8
2
6112
App
lican
t is
requ
este
d to
exp
lain
the
appa
rent
dis
crep
ancy
with
the
3,00
0 ft/
sec
shee
r w
ave
velo
city
den
oted
in th
e C
OLA
and
a v
alue
of 6
,600
ft/s
ec u
sed
for t
he w
ave
prop
ogat
ion
effe
ct in
the
calc
ulat
ions
calc
ulat
ion.
Cal
cula
tion
will
be
clar
ified
or r
evis
ed
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - B
. 7.
3.8
- C. 1
2.
Pun
ch L
ist 8
262
Not
Use
dN
/AN
/A
63
Aud
it re
port
3.8
I 8. C
alcu
latio
n no
. U7-
RS
W-S
-CA
LC-D
ES
N-6
001,
Rev
isio
n D
, “B
asic
S
truct
ural
Des
ign
of R
eact
or S
ervi
ce W
ater
(RS
W) T
unne
l”.
The
staf
f not
ed th
at s
ever
al a
reas
of d
esig
n of
the
tunn
el w
ere
not c
ompl
ete
at ti
me
of
the
audi
t, e.
g., g
loba
l tor
nado
mis
sile
impa
ct e
valu
atio
n fo
r the
acc
ess
regi
on o
f the
tu
nnel
, tun
nel w
alls
in th
e co
rner
regi
on, a
cces
s co
vers
, etc
.
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8
Pun
ch L
ist 1
02
643.
8-25
Rev
ise
Con
trol B
uild
ing
Ann
ex s
tabi
lity
calc
ulat
ion
to e
limin
ate
stat
emen
t reg
ardi
ng
desi
gn b
eing
app
licab
le to
DC
D S
tand
ard
Pla
nt
Cal
cula
tion
will
be
revi
sed
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8 - B
. 8.
6518
Com
men
ts o
n R
espo
nse
to R
AI 0
3.07
.02-
22O
n th
e C
OLA
Mar
kup,
Sec
tion
3H.6
.6.2
.1 U
HS
bas
in, U
HS
Coo
ling
Tow
er E
nclo
sure
, an
d R
SW
Pum
p H
ouse
, pro
vide
an
expl
anat
ion
of th
e pr
essu
re d
istri
butio
n fo
r the
ca
lcul
ated
sei
smic
soi
l pre
ssur
es o
n th
e R
SW
Pum
p H
ouse
Nor
th W
all s
how
n in
Fi
gure
3H
.6-2
19 fr
om 2
D S
SS
I.
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
7 - F
6619
Com
men
ts o
n R
espo
nse
to R
AI 0
3.07
.02-
24, S
uppl
emen
t 1, R
evis
ion
1O
n th
e C
OLA
Mar
kup,
Sec
tion
3H.6
.5.3
Sei
smic
Ana
lysi
s of
RS
W P
ipin
g Tu
nnel
, in
the
4th
bulle
t on
the
follo
win
g pa
ge (P
age
11 o
f 27)
, ple
ase
clar
ify fo
r whi
ch s
oil c
ase
the
crac
ked
conc
rete
and
soi
l sep
arat
ion
anal
ysis
was
per
form
ed. T
his
info
rmat
ion
is
not p
rovi
ded
in th
e C
OLA
mar
kup.
Ref
er to
Act
ion
Item
3.7
-48
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8
Pun
ch L
ist 9
8
6720
Com
men
ts o
n R
espo
nse
to R
AI 0
3.07
.01-
27, S
uppl
emen
t 1, R
evis
ion
1O
n th
e C
OLA
Mar
kup,
Sec
tion
3H.6
.7 D
iese
l Gen
erat
or F
uel O
il S
tora
ge V
ault
(DG
FOS
V),
prov
ide
furth
er c
larif
icat
ions
why
two
diffe
rent
inpu
t mot
ions
are
de
velo
ped
and
used
in s
epar
ate
SS
I ana
lyse
s of
DG
FOS
V
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
7 - F
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
7 of
27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
6821
Com
men
ts o
n R
espo
nse
to R
AI 0
3.07
.02-
29, S
uppl
emen
t 1
Pos
t Aud
it C
larif
icat
ion
Issu
e #6
sub
mitt
ed a
s pa
rt of
the
resp
onse
to R
AI 0
3.07
.02-
29, S
uppl
emen
t 1.
Bec
ause
the
shap
e of
the
resp
onse
, tra
nsfe
r fun
ctio
ns a
re
stro
ngly
dep
ende
nt o
n th
e a o
val
ue (e
.g. a
s sh
own
in F
ig. 0
3.07
.02-
29 S
1.6
prov
ided
w
ith th
is re
spon
se),
the
appl
ican
t is
requ
este
d to
ext
end
the
resu
lts o
f the
abo
ve te
st
prob
lem
s in
term
s of
the
foun
datio
n re
spon
se tr
ansf
er fu
nctio
ns (i
nclu
ding
bot
h co
mpl
ianc
e an
d sc
atte
ring
func
tions
) cal
cula
ted
usin
g th
e su
btra
ctio
n m
etho
d to
ao
valu
es u
p to
at l
east
8.
Issu
e a
revi
sion
to th
e S
AS
SI R
elea
se M
emo.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
Upd
ate
Rel
ease
Mem
o6/
30/1
1
6922
DN
FSB
Issu
es R
elat
ed to
the
SA
SS
I Sub
tract
ion
Met
hod
The
Def
ense
Nuc
lear
Fac
ilitie
s S
afet
y B
oard
(DN
FSB
) iss
ued
a le
tter o
n A
pril
8th,
20
11 re
ques
ting
the
Dep
artm
ent o
f Ene
rgy
(DO
E) t
o ad
dres
s te
chni
cal a
nd s
oftw
are
qual
ity a
ssur
ance
issu
es re
late
d to
pot
entia
lly e
rron
eous
sei
smic
ana
lyse
s pe
rform
ed
usin
g th
e S
AS
SI S
ubtra
ctio
n m
etho
d. S
AS
SI s
ubtra
ctio
n m
etho
d ha
s be
en u
sed
for
STP
app
licat
ion
for e
mbe
dded
stru
ctur
es.
As
such
, the
app
lican
t is
requ
este
d to
re
view
thes
e co
ncer
ns a
nd a
sses
s th
e po
tent
ial i
mpa
ct o
n S
TP’s
sei
smic
ana
lysi
s.
Ref
er to
Act
ion
Item
s 3.
7-37
& 3
.7-3
8
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8
Pun
ch L
ist 7
1 &
72
70
Aud
it R
epor
t 3.8
D2
5. “T
he a
ccel
erat
ions
are
take
n fro
m th
e S
SI a
naly
sis
of th
e va
ult.
A re
fere
nce
is g
iven
in th
e re
port
from
whe
re th
e ac
cele
ratio
ns w
ere
take
n. A
s th
is in
form
atio
n w
as n
ot v
erifi
ed d
urin
g th
e au
dit,
the
staf
f pla
ns to
ver
ify th
e so
urce
an
d th
e ac
cele
ratio
n va
lues
dur
ing
the
next
aud
it.”
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8
713.
7-37
22P
rovi
de in
an
RA
I res
pons
e a
plan
to re
solv
e th
e is
sues
rela
ted
to s
ubtra
ctio
n m
etho
d in
SA
SS
I, as
des
crib
ed in
the
DO
E le
tter.
(Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
22)
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-29
6/20
/11
723.
7-38
22S
ubse
quen
t to
Act
ion
Item
3.7
-37,
revi
se th
e re
sults
pre
sent
ed in
CO
LA a
s ne
cess
ary.
(Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
22)
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-29
S1 D
raft
9/1/
11
733.
7-39
Rev
ise
RW
B s
tabi
lity
calc
ulat
ion
cons
ider
ing
ampl
ified
mot
ion
at g
roun
d su
rface
and
re
vise
CO
LA a
s ne
cess
ary.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.02
-13
S37/
28/1
1
743.
8-26
14
Rev
ise
the
resp
onse
for I
mpo
rtanc
e Fa
ctor
use
d fo
r win
d lo
adin
g (R
AI 0
3.08
.04-
30
S1)
to s
tate
that
our
pos
ition
is d
evia
ting
from
SR
P 3
.3 g
uida
nce
base
d on
the
just
ifica
tion
prov
ided
in th
e R
AI r
espo
nse.
Als
o re
vise
the
Impo
rtanc
e Fa
ctor
from
1.
15 to
1.0
. (C
larif
icat
ion
Issu
e 14
)
S&
LP
. K. A
graw
al03
.08.
04-3
0 S3
6/20
/11
753.
8-27
13.6
17.6
Upd
ate
the
desi
gn p
aram
eter
s ta
ble
with
dam
ping
val
ues
for R
adw
aste
Bui
ldin
g D
esig
n, a
nd in
clud
e th
e ta
ble
in S
ectio
n 3.
8 of
CO
LA. (
Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sues
13.
6 an
d 17
.6)
S&
LP
. K. A
graw
al03
.08.
04-3
0 S3
6/20
/11
763.
8-28
Exa
min
e am
plifi
ed in
put m
otio
n us
ed fo
r Ser
vice
Bui
ldin
g st
abili
ty e
valu
atio
n.
Ref
er to
Act
ion
Item
3.8
-27
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
8
Pun
ch L
ist 7
5
773.
8-29
16C
larif
y re
spon
se to
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-19
to s
tate
that
the
stat
ic c
oeffi
cien
t of f
rictio
n at
the
inte
rface
of m
udm
at a
nd s
oil w
ill n
ot e
xcee
d 0.
75. A
lso
incl
ude
the
requ
irem
ent f
or
rou g
heni
ng th
e co
ncre
te s
urfa
ces
in th
e C
OLA
. (C
larif
icat
ion
Issu
e 16
)
S&
LP
. K. A
graw
al03
.08.
04-1
9 S2
6/20
/11
783.
8-30
17.3
Pro
vide
mor
e le
gibl
e Fi
gure
s 3H
.6-1
38 a
nd 1
39 in
CO
LA. (
Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
17.3
)S
&L
P. K
. Agr
awal
03.0
8.04
-30
S36/
20/1
1
793.
8-31
17.4
Add
in th
e FS
AR
that
the
Larg
e E
quip
men
t Acc
ess
Bui
ldin
g (L
EA
B) f
ound
atio
n w
ill b
e de
sign
ed s
uch
that
the
surc
harg
e on
the
DG
FOS
V lo
cate
d di
rect
ly e
ast o
f the
LE
AB
w
ill b
e ne
glig
ible
. (C
larif
icat
ion
Issu
e 17
.4)
S&
LP
. K. A
graw
al03
.07.
01-2
7 S4
7/11
/11
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
8 of
27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
803.
8-32
17.1
The
CO
LA w
ill b
e re
vise
d to
refe
r to
Figu
res
3H.6
-212
thro
ugh
3H.6
-217
for R
SW
P
ipin
g Tu
nnel
des
ign.
(Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
17.1
)S
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
n03
.07.
01-2
7 S4
7/11
/11
813.
8-33
17.5
Cla
rify
title
for F
igur
e 3H
.6-1
37 to
spe
cify
that
it is
app
licab
le to
Cat
egor
y I s
ite-s
peci
fic
stru
ctur
es (C
larif
icat
ion
Issu
e 17
.5)
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.02
-13
S37/
28/1
1
823.
8-34
12
Rev
ise
the
wav
e pr
opag
atio
n ca
lcul
atio
ns fo
r the
tunn
els
usin
g th
e fo
llow
ing:
1)
an
appa
rent
wav
e ve
loci
ty o
f 300
0 ft/
s2)
max
imum
gro
und
velo
city
bas
ed o
n si
te-s
peci
fic S
SE
max
imum
gro
und
acce
lera
tion
of 0
.13g
3)
a tr
iang
ular
pre
ssur
e di
strib
utio
n lim
ited
by th
e m
axim
um p
assi
ve p
ress
ure
Rev
ise
CO
LA to
refle
ct th
ese
chan
ges
also
.(C
larif
icat
ion
Issu
e 12
, AI 3
.8-2
3 an
d 3.
8-24
)
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
8.04
-30
S57/
15/1
1
833.
8-35
3 8P
rovi
de in
CO
LA th
e di
scus
sion
of s
tabi
lity
eval
uatio
n fo
r eac
h st
ruct
ure
incl
udin
g a
disc
ussi
on o
f the
inpu
t mot
ion.
(C
larif
icat
ion
Issu
es 3
and
8)
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.02
-13
S411
/23/
11
843.
8-36
Ver
ify e
quiv
alen
t sta
tic lo
adin
g fo
r RS
W P
ipin
g Tu
nnel
and
Fue
l Oil
Tunn
el e
xcee
d th
at fr
om S
SI
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.02
-13
S411
/23/
11
853.
7-40
Pro
vide
resp
onse
to q
uest
ions
on
late
ral p
ress
ure
diag
ram
s
Ref
er to
Act
ion
Item
s 3.
7-42
& 3
.7-4
4
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
7
Pun
ch L
ist 8
7 &
89
863.
7-41
Dis
cuss
the
effe
cts
of g
roun
dwat
er c
hang
e on
UH
S re
spon
ses
Ref
er to
Act
ion
Item
3.7
-46
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
N/A
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
7
Pun
ch L
ist 9
1
873.
7-42
Rev
ise
Figu
re 3
H.6
-219
to re
mov
e 2D
'Alo
ne' s
oil p
ress
ure
prof
ile. A
lso
revi
se th
e fig
ure
to p
rovi
de s
eism
ic p
ress
ure
prof
ile u
sed
for d
esig
n in
lieu
of s
tatic
+ d
ynam
ic.
Als
o ch
eck
othe
r fig
ures
for t
he s
ame
issu
es.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-27
S47/
11/1
1
883.
7-43
Add
the
fact
or o
f saf
ety
for f
loat
atio
n in
Tab
le 3
H.6
-14
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.02
-13
S37/
28/1
1
893.
7-44
Ver
ify th
at S
GH
's v
alid
atio
n fo
r SA
SS
I inc
lude
d ve
rific
atio
n fo
r soi
l pre
ssur
es a
nd
prov
ide
valid
atio
n fo
r NR
C re
view
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
N/A
May
Aud
it3.
7
903.
7-45
Turb
ine
Bui
ldin
g S
eism
ic C
alcu
latio
n, F
luor
cal
cula
tion
num
ber U
3-TB
-S-C
ALC
-DE
SN
-21
00 R
ev B
, sho
uld
be re
vise
d fo
r the
follo
win
g:1)
Ass
umpt
ion
1 on
she
et 9
of 2
88 s
houl
d be
cla
rifie
d to
cle
arly
des
crib
e ho
w m
ass
and
stiff
ness
es w
ere
deriv
ed fr
om d
iffer
ent T
urbi
ne B
uild
ing
mod
els
2) O
n sh
eet 8
of 2
88, c
orre
ct R
efer
ence
3 d
ocum
ent n
umbe
r fro
m U
3-TB
-S-C
ALC
-D
ES
N-2
001
to U
7-TB
-S-C
ALC
-DE
SN
-200
13)
Rev
ise
Sec
tion
5.15
to c
lear
ly d
escr
ibe
how
the
seis
mic
dem
and
was
det
erm
ined
. Fo
r exa
mpl
e, c
larif
y th
e st
atem
ent i
n th
e la
st p
arag
raph
of s
heet
250
"afte
r run
ning
th
e R
SA
sta
tic a
naly
sis
is th
en ru
n w
ith th
e R
SA
resu
lts to
det
erm
ine
the
base
she
ar".
Als
o de
scrib
e ho
w th
e R
ISA
anl
aysi
s w
as d
one
in 3
dire
ctio
ns a
nd h
ow th
e 3
dire
ctio
nal r
espo
nses
wer
e co
mbi
ned.
TAN
EJi
m F
isic
aro
03.0
7.02
-13
S37/
28/1
1
913.
7-46
For g
roun
dwat
er re
solu
tion,
in a
dditi
on to
the
RA
I res
pons
e pr
ovid
ed, p
erfo
rm th
e fo
llow
ing:
1) U
se 2
8 ft
grou
ndw
ater
leve
l in
the
anal
ysis
bei
ng p
erfo
rmed
for D
OE
lette
r (A
I 3.7
-37
)2)
Rev
ise
the
CO
LA m
arku
p pr
ovid
ed in
the
prev
ious
RA
I res
pons
e 03
.07.
01-2
7 S
33)
Rev
ise
the
SS
I cal
cula
tions
to a
dd a
cla
rific
atio
n fo
r gro
undw
ater
leve
l
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-29
S1 D
raft
9/1/
11
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
9 of
27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
923.
8-37
For R
adw
aste
Bui
ldin
g, re
vise
the
CO
LA fo
r the
follo
win
g:--
Add
cla
rific
atio
n in
Sec
tion
3H.3
.5.1
, 2 a
nd 3
for s
eism
ic a
naly
sis
mod
els
(stic
k m
odel
for s
tabi
lity,
FE
M m
odel
for d
esig
n an
d II/
I) [C
larif
icat
ion
Issu
e 13
.1]
-- D
elet
e ve
rtica
l acc
eler
atio
ns fr
om T
able
3H
.3-1
[Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
13.1
]--
Rev
ise
Sec
tion
3H.3
.4.3
.4.2
to in
clud
e N
690
prov
isio
n fo
r she
ar a
llow
able
[C
larif
icat
ion
Issu
e 13
.3]
-- R
evis
e S
ectio
n 3H
.3.4
.2.1
to s
tate
that
bea
ring
pres
sure
cap
acity
is d
eter
min
ed
usin
g m
etho
dolo
gy d
escr
ibed
in C
OLA
Sec
tion
2.5S
.4 [C
larif
icat
ion
Issu
e 13
.4]
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
8.04
-18
S37/
28/1
1
933.
8-38
Rev
ise
resp
onse
to R
AI 0
3.08
.04-
35 to
exp
lain
des
ign
in li
eu o
f fur
ther
ana
lysi
s fo
r eq
uiva
lent
bea
ring
pres
sure
.S
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
n03
.08.
04-3
5 R
16/
30/1
1
943.
8-39
Pro
vide
que
stio
ns o
n Tu
rbin
e B
uild
ing
and
Ser
vice
Bui
ldin
g st
abili
ty c
alcu
latio
ns b
y ab
out 1
0 a.
m. o
n 5/
26
Ref
er to
Act
ion
Item
3.7
-45
NR
CC
hakr
abar
tiN
/AN
/A
May
Aud
it3.
8
Pun
ch L
ist 9
0
953.
8-40
Dis
cuss
add
ition
al in
form
atio
n to
be
incl
uded
in C
OLA
for I
I/I e
valu
atio
ns o
f non
-se
ism
ic C
ate g
ory
I stru
ctur
es w
ith O
GC
NR
CTo
m T
aiN
/AN
/A7/
22/1
1
963.
8-41
Rev
ise
UH
S d
esig
n ca
lcul
atio
n to
use
N69
0-19
94 S
uppl
emen
t 2S
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
n
U7-
UH
S-S-
CA
LC-D
ESN
-60
02U
7-YA
RD
-S-C
ALC
-DES
N-
6001
6/30
/11
973.
7-47
For S
ervi
ce B
uild
ing
stab
ility
cal
cula
tion
(U3-
SB
-S-C
ALC
-DE
SN
-210
0 R
ev. B
), ex
pand
Sec
tion
5.14
to fu
lly d
escr
ibe
how
the
seis
mic
ana
lysi
s w
as p
erfo
rmed
and
sp
ecifi
cally
add
ress
the
follo
win
g:1)
How
the
stic
k m
odel
mas
s an
d st
iffne
ss w
ere
calc
ulat
ed o
r pro
vide
a c
opy
of R
ef.
No.
23,
U3-
SB
-CA
LC-D
ES
N-2
001
Rev
. 0, "
Cal
cula
tion
of S
ervi
ce B
uild
ing
Mas
s an
d S
tiffn
ess
Mod
el" f
or re
view
.2)
RS
A d
etai
ls:
- 1.
mod
al c
ombi
natio
n m
etho
d -
2. c
ombi
natio
n of
3 d
irect
iona
l res
pons
esA
ttach
men
t 01
shee
ts 4
and
5 -
1. W
hat a
re m
odes
5 a
nd 6
with
freq
uenc
y >
3.0x
108
Hz?
Writ
e C
ondi
tion
Rep
ort t
o do
cum
ent r
espo
nse
and
track
cal
cula
tion
revi
sion
. See
A
ctio
n Ite
m 3
.8-4
0.
TAN
EJi
m F
isic
aro
03.0
7.02
-13
S37/
28/1
1
983.
7-48
Cla
rify
CO
LA S
ectio
n 3H
.6.5
.3 to
spe
cify
that
UB
Bac
kfill
soi
l cas
e w
as u
sed
for
crac
ked
and
sepa
rate
d ca
ses
(Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
19)
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
8.04
-30
S36/
20/1
1
993.
7-49
Rev
ise
calc
ulat
ion
U7-
UH
S-C
-CA
LC-D
ES
N-6
007
to d
elet
e Ta
ble
3 (R
efer
ence
Mar
ch
2011
aud
it re
port)
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
U7-
UH
S-C
-CA
LC-D
ESN
-60
079/
1/11
100
Not
Use
dN
/AN
/A
101
3.8-
42
Rev
ise
the
Con
trol B
uild
ing
Ann
ex s
tabi
lity
eval
uatio
n to
use
AS
CE
7-0
5 in
stea
d of
A
SC
E 7
-88.
Che
ck fo
r tw
o ca
ses,
(1) w
ith li
ve lo
ad fo
r bot
h th
e st
abili
zing
forc
e an
d th
e dr
ivin
g fo
rce
and
(2) w
ith n
o liv
e lo
ad fo
r eith
er th
e st
abili
zing
forc
e or
the
driv
ing
forc
e
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.02
-13
S37/
28/1
1
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
10 o
f 27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
102
3.8-
43
Aud
it R
epor
t Sec
tion
3.8
I 8. C
alcu
latio
n no
. U7-
RS
W-S
-CA
LC-D
ES
N-6
001,
Rev
isio
n D
, “B
asic
Stru
ctur
al D
esig
n of
Rea
ctor
Ser
vice
Wat
er (R
SW
) Tun
nel”.
The
staf
f not
ed th
at s
ever
al a
reas
of d
esig
n of
the
tunn
el w
ere
not c
ompl
ete
at ti
me
of
the
audi
t, e.
g., g
loba
l tor
nado
mis
sile
impa
ct e
valu
atio
n fo
r the
acc
ess
regi
on o
f the
tu
nnel
, tun
nel w
alls
in th
e co
rner
regi
on, a
cces
s co
vers
, etc
.
Incl
ude
the
clos
ure
in th
e M
ay a
udit
repo
rt
NR
CC
hakr
abar
tiN
/AN
/A
103
Eva
luat
e D
NFS
B Is
sues
Rel
ated
to th
e S
AS
SI S
ubtra
ctio
n M
etho
d w
ith th
e m
odel
us
ed to
per
form
sen
sitiv
ity a
naly
sis
rela
ted
to P
oiss
on's
Rat
io (P
unch
Lis
t Ite
m 2
9)N
RC
N/A
N/A
Dis
cuss
ed a
t S
epte
mbe
r Aud
it
104
Pro
vide
legi
ble
prin
ts o
f Tab
le 3
H.8
-1 c
onta
ined
in th
e Ju
ne 1
6 re
spon
se in
Let
ter U
7-C
-NIN
A-N
RC
-110
081
S&
LP
. K. A
graw
alN
/A6/
29/1
1
105
Pro
vide
a p
lan
for p
rovi
ding
info
rmat
ion
that
will
allo
w th
e S
taff
to m
ake
a de
term
inat
ion
that
II/I
for t
he A
FIP
H is
ade
quat
ely
addr
esse
d in
the
FSA
RW
ill b
e ad
dres
sed
unde
r RA
I 03.
07.0
2-32
(Pun
ch L
ist I
tem
109
)
S&
LP
. K. A
graw
alN
/A7/
22/1
1
106
Pro
vide
app
lican
t with
an
upda
te o
n w
hat a
ctio
ns, i
f any
, are
requ
ired
as a
resu
lt of
hu
rric
ane
win
d lo
ad c
onsi
dera
tion
in C
hapt
ers
2 an
d 3
- no
actio
n re
quire
d by
NIN
AN
RC
Cha
krab
arti
N/A
N/A
7/27
/201
1
107
23
Sta
ff ha
s a
conc
ern
that
AC
I 349
-97
App
endi
x B
Ste
el E
mbe
dmen
ts, r
efer
ence
d in
R
espo
nse
to R
AI 0
3.08
.04-
33 (p
age
3 of
7),
is n
ot e
ndor
sed
by N
RC
.
App
lican
t will
pro
vide
cla
rific
atio
n.
Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
#23
S&
LP
. K. A
graw
al03
.08.
04-3
3 S1
7/28
/11
108
Sta
ff re
ques
ts a
dditi
onal
des
crip
tion
of fo
unda
tions
in F
SA
R 3
.8.5
. A
pplic
ant w
ill p
rovi
de a
brie
f des
crip
tion
of th
e fo
unda
tions
, fou
ndat
ion
anal
ysis
, and
di
ffere
ntia
l set
tlem
ent d
eter
min
atio
n, in
clud
ing
cons
ider
atio
n of
con
stru
ctio
n se
quen
ce.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.02
-13
S37/
28/1
1
109
Dev
elop
a re
spon
se a
nd IT
AA
C to
add
ress
II/I
issu
es a
ssoc
ited
with
3.7
.2.8
in
resp
onse
to a
n up
com
ing
RA
I
Ref
er to
Pun
ch L
ist I
tem
95
S&
LP
. K. A
graw
al03
.07.
02-3
29/
1/11
110
From
the
July
12,
201
1 su
bmitt
al in
NIN
A le
tter 1
1009
9 (R
AI 0
3.08
.04-
30):
(a) T
able
3H
.6-6
, “R
esul
ts o
f RS
W P
ipin
g Tu
nnel
Des
ign”
, dis
cuss
the
smal
l di
ffere
nces
bet
wee
n R
equi
red
vs. P
rovi
ded
Rei
nfor
cem
ent (
0.7
vers
us 0
.79
or 0
.97
vers
us 1
.00)
or n
on-e
xist
ent (
1.56
for b
oth)
.(b
) Che
ck s
ee if
Not
e 3
in T
able
3H
.6-6
is c
lear
as
writ
ten.
(c) D
eter
min
e if
ther
e is
a s
ketc
h de
finin
g th
e re
info
rcin
g zo
nes
in th
e R
SW
PT
(d) I
n Fi
gure
3H
.6-2
47, i
s th
e pa
ssiv
e pr
essu
re s
how
n ap
plic
able
to th
e en
tire
RS
WP
T de
sign
?
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
8.04
-30
S6(A
ll bu
t RW
B &
DG
FOSV
)9/
12/1
1
111
Pro
vide
the
requ
ired
mat
eria
l for
ver
ifica
tion
of th
e re
spon
se to
Pun
ch L
ist I
tem
18
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
N/A
8/12
/11
112
3.7-
50Id
entif
y R
AI r
espo
nses
that
just
ify e
xcee
danc
es s
een
in s
oil p
ress
ure
plot
sS
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
n03
.07.
01-2
9 S1
, R1
11/2
3/11
`
113
3.7-
51Id
entif
y R
AI r
espo
nse
that
dis
cuss
es s
eism
ic g
ap jo
int m
ater
ial
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
N/A
8/16
/11
114
3.7-
5222
In R
AI r
espo
nse,
pro
vide
exp
lana
tion
of "m
odifi
ed s
ubtra
ctio
n m
odel
" -- s
tate
th
at a
ll su
rface
nod
es a
re in
clud
edS
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
n03
.07.
01-2
9 S1
Dra
ft9/
1/11
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
11 o
f 27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
115
3.7-
5322
In R
AI r
espo
nse,
whe
n de
scrib
ing
soil
case
s fo
r Sec
tion
6 S
SS
I ana
lysi
s, ju
stify
co
nsid
erin
g on
ly U
B B
ackf
ill a
nd L
B In
-situ
soi
l cas
esS
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
n03
.07.
01-2
9 S1
Dra
ft9/
1/11
116
3.7-
5422
In R
AI r
espo
nse,
pro
vide
reas
onin
g as
to w
hy fo
r the
sec
tion
east
of S
ectio
n 7
whe
re n
o S
SS
I ana
lysi
s is
per
form
ed, t
he D
GFO
SV
is a
dequ
ate.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-29
S1 D
raft
9/1/
11
117
3.7-
5522
In R
AI r
espo
nses
, whe
re "e
ngin
eerin
g ju
dgem
ent"
is u
sed,
pro
vide
sup
porti
ng
tech
nica
l jus
tific
atio
nS
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
n03
.07.
01-2
9 S1
Dra
ft9/
1/11
118
22P
rovi
de re
sults
for P
unch
Lis
t Ite
ms
72, 1
14, 1
15, 1
17, 1
23, a
nd 1
24 (R
efer
to R
AI
03.0
7.01
-29
S1
Dra
ft )S
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
n03
.07.
01-2
9 S1
11/1
4/11
`
119
3.8-
21B
eam
she
ar d
iscu
ssio
nC
alcu
latio
ns w
ill b
e re
vise
d an
d FS
AR
tabl
es w
ill b
e up
date
d as
a C
onfir
mat
ory
Act
ion
Follo
w u
p to
Pun
ch L
ist I
tem
56
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
8.04
-34
S2(R
WB
& D
GFO
SV)
11/1
4/11
`
120
3.7-
578
Follo
w u
p to
Pun
ch L
ist I
tem
s 27
, 28,
83
& 8
4 re
late
d to
sta
bilit
y ev
alua
tions
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.02
-13
S411
/23/
11
121
22P
rovi
de re
sults
for P
unch
Lis
t Ite
ms
91 &
116
rela
ted
to g
roun
dwat
er e
leva
tion
and
DO
E le
tter r
esol
utio
nIn
clud
e re
sults
in C
OLA
Mar
k-up
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-29
S111
/14/
11`
122
22P
rovi
de S
SI s
oil p
ress
ures
for t
he R
SW
Tun
nel
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
8.04
-30
S6(A
ll bu
t RW
B &
DG
FOSV
)9/
12/1
1
123
22S
how
why
soi
l pre
ssur
es o
btai
ned
from
MS
M S
SI a
naly
sis
for t
he U
HS
/RS
W
Pum
phou
se a
nd D
GFO
SV
are
con
serv
ativ
ely
boun
ded
by th
e ac
tual
des
ign
pres
sure
s.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-29
S1 D
raft
9/1/
11
124
22
Dur
ing
the
Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
, Uni
ts 3
&4,
Aud
it of
FS
AR
Sec
tion
3.7,
RA
I 03.
07.0
1-29
, SA
SS
I Iss
ues
Rai
sed
by th
e D
NFS
B L
ette
r to
DO
E, N
INA
pre
sent
ed T
able
6.2
–
Com
paris
on o
f Dire
ct a
nd M
odifi
ed S
ubtra
ctio
n M
etho
d B
eam
For
ces
in th
e Y
-D
irect
ion.
NIN
A is
requ
este
d to
cla
rify
Tabl
e 6.
2.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-29
S1 D
raft
9/1/
11
125
24D
escr
ibe
whe
re in
the
FSA
R th
e ba
sis
for t
he C
assi
ficat
ion
IIb fo
r the
RW
B is
ju
stifi
ed.
S&
LP
. K. A
graw
al03
.08.
04-3
79/
12/1
1Is
sues
rem
ain
unde
r di
scus
sion
bet
wee
n N
INA
and
NR
C
126
Des
crib
e th
e R
adw
aste
Tun
nel i
n th
e FS
AR
in s
uffic
ient
det
ail f
or S
taff
to c
oncl
ude
its
pote
ntia
l effe
ct o
n ad
jace
nt s
truct
ures
or d
escr
ibe
whe
re th
e in
form
atio
n m
ay b
e fo
und
in e
xist
ing
docu
men
tatio
n
S&
LP
. K. A
graw
alA
udit
Dis
cuss
ion
N/A
Was
dis
cuss
ed
durin
g au
dit;
no
rela
ted
RA
I.
127
25Is
sues
iden
tifie
d by
NR
C th
at n
eed
furth
er c
onsi
dera
tion
to re
solv
e D
OE
SA
SS
I is
sues
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-30
11/2
3/11
`
128
Cor
rect
a ty
po in
FS
AR
Tab
le 3
.2-1
on
Pag
e 3.
2-5
unde
r Com
pone
nt P
8, b
y re
visi
ng
the
pare
nthe
tical
text
from
U16
to U
20.
S&
LP
. K. A
graw
al09
.02.
05-1
R1
9/15
/11
129
Pro
vide
cla
rific
atio
n re
gard
ing
how
the
desi
gn o
f non
-Cat
egor
y I s
truct
ures
is b
ased
on
IBC
-200
6 re
sult
in "t
he m
argi
n of
saf
ety
of th
e st
ruct
ure
is e
quiv
alen
t to
that
of t
he
Cat
egor
y I s
truct
ures
" for
II/I.
Res
pons
e to
RA
I 03.
07.2
-32
(eR
AI 5
919)
on
the
acce
ptan
ce c
riter
ia o
f ITA
AC
Tab
les
3.0-
21 to
3.0
-25
for t
he tu
rbin
e bu
ildin
g, s
ervi
ce b
uild
ing,
radw
aste
bui
ldin
g, c
ontro
l bu
ildin
g an
nex,
and
the
stac
k on
the
reac
tor b
uild
ing
roof
, res
pect
ivel
y.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.02
-32
R1
12/2
1/11
Dra
ft re
visi
on fo
r IT
AA
C w
as d
iscu
ssed
w
ith N
RC
. NR
C
prov
ided
feed
back
on
11/0
2.
130
Dis
cuss
Con
tain
men
t IS
I in
FSA
RS
&L
R. W
. Hoo
ks03
.08.
01-1
111
/17/
11
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
12 o
f 27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
131
3.7-
58R
AI 0
3.08
.04-
30 S
5, c
larif
y w
hy th
e w
ave
prop
agat
ion
for D
GFO
ST
is b
ased
on
site
-sp
ecifi
c S
SE
. D
esig
n pa
ram
eter
s ta
ble
will
be
upda
ted
per A
ctio
n Ite
m 3
.7-5
8.S
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
n03
.08.
04-3
0 S7
11/1
4/11
`
132
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-30
S6
The
note
d 11
% m
argi
n fo
r RS
W p
ipin
g tu
nnel
s is
not
app
licab
le to
she
ar, p
leas
e pr
ovid
e ju
stifi
catio
nFo
r RS
W p
ipin
g tu
nnel
s it
is s
tate
d th
at p
assi
ve p
ress
ure
cont
rols
the
desi
gn, p
leas
e cl
arify
.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
Aud
it D
iscu
ssio
nN
/AW
as d
iscu
ssed
du
ring
audi
t; no
re
late
d R
AI.
133
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-34
S1,
Fig
ure
3H.7
-10a
refe
renc
ed in
the
resp
onse
doe
s no
t exi
st.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
Aud
it D
iscu
ssio
nN
/AW
as d
iscu
ssed
du
ring
audi
t; no
re
late
d R
AI.
134
3.7-
58
CO
LA R
ev. 6
, Fi
gure
s 3H
.7-3
1 an
d 3H
.7-3
2 ar
e no
t leg
ible
. Tab
le 3
H.9
-1, t
he T
able
hea
ding
is
note
d as
Tab
le 3
H.8
-1. C
OLA
Rev
6 fi
gure
s 3H
.7-3
1 an
d 32
will
be
repl
aced
.D
esig
n pa
ram
eter
s ta
ble
will
be
upda
ted
per A
ctio
n Ite
m 3
.7-5
8.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
8.04
-30
S711
/14/
11`
135
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-18
S3,
cla
rify
why
all
acce
lera
tions
for t
he R
WB
wer
e de
lete
d.S
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
nA
udit
Dis
cuss
ion
N/A
Was
dis
cuss
ed
durin
g au
dit;
no
rela
ted
RA
I.
136
3.7-
563.
7-57
Cla
rify
if th
ere
is a
ny S
SI a
naly
sis
for S
ervi
ce B
uild
ing
(RA
I 03.
07.0
2-13
Sup
plem
ent
3) a
nd a
lso
clar
ify re
spon
se fo
r Tur
bine
Bui
ldin
g an
d S
ervi
ce B
uild
ing
In re
spon
se to
RA
I 03.
07.0
2-13
S4
desc
ribe
in th
e FS
AR
the
sour
ce fo
r E' a
nd E
s an
d di
scus
s th
e co
mpa
rison
of E
' and
Es
vers
us w
hat i
s ob
tain
ed fr
om S
SI o
r SS
SI
and
add
a st
atem
ent t
hat t
he c
oncl
usio
ns a
re c
onse
rvat
ive
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.02
-13
S3 R
111
/23/
11
137
3.7-
59Fo
r sta
bilit
y ev
alua
tions
add
ress
all
exce
edan
ces
base
d on
am
plifi
ed m
otio
nS
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
n03
.07.
01-2
9 S1
, R1
11/2
3/11
`
138
3.7-
60Fo
r RS
W P
ipin
g Tu
nnel
, sca
ling
of s
pect
ra fo
r all
dam
ping
s sh
ould
be
calc
ulat
ed a
t sa
me
frequ
ency
inte
rval
s us
ed fo
r UH
S b
ased
on
the
ratio
of n
ew a
mpl
ified
mot
ion
over
the
old
ampl
ified
mot
ion
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-29
S1, R
111
/23/
11`
139
3.7-
61A
lso
addr
ess
ampl
ified
mot
ion
for F
uel O
il S
tora
ge V
ault
adja
cent
to U
ltim
ate
Hea
t S
ink
for U
B s
oil c
ase
usin
g M
SM
met
hod
for b
oth
full
and
empt
y ba
sin
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-29
S1, R
111
/23/
11`
140
3.7-
62In
clud
e flo
w c
hart
for D
OE
issu
e in
the
resp
onse
to R
AI 0
3.07
.01-
29 S
1S
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
n03
.07.
01-2
9 S1
11/1
4/11
`
141
3.7-
63In
RA
I res
pons
e 03
.07.
01-3
0, a
lso
disc
uss
the
pres
sure
exe
rted
by th
e co
mpr
essi
ble
mat
eria
l on
the
Pum
p H
ouse
wal
l and
als
o w
hy n
o ad
ditio
nal S
SS
I sec
tion
is n
eede
d fo
r the
Fue
l Oil
Sto
rage
Vau
lt ad
jace
nt to
the
RS
W T
unne
l
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-29
S1, R
111
/23/
11`
142
3.7-
64W
hen
addr
essi
ng a
mpl
ified
mot
ion,
cle
arly
des
crib
e w
hy C
ontro
l Bui
ldin
g A
nnex
is
not a
ffect
ed b
y D
OE
issu
eS
&L
Java
d M
osle
mia
n03
.07.
01-2
9 S1
, R1
11/2
3/11
`
143
1. D
emon
stra
te th
at th
e am
plifi
ed s
eism
ic in
put (
i.e.,
ampl
ified
inpu
t spe
ctra
due
to
pres
ence
of t
he n
earb
y he
avy
stru
ctur
es),
if ge
nera
ted
by u
sing
the
Sub
tract
ion
Met
hod
(SM
) for
DG
FOT,
RS
WP
T, D
GFO
SV
, and
any
oth
er s
truct
ures
as
appl
icab
le
wou
ld b
e co
nser
vativ
e as
com
pare
d to
thos
e ob
tain
ed u
sing
the
Mod
ified
Sub
tract
ion
Met
hod
(MS
M) o
r the
Dire
ct M
etho
d (D
M).
Alte
rnat
ivel
y, th
e ap
plic
ant m
ay u
se
ampl
ified
spe
ctra
der
ived
from
the
use
of M
SM
or t
he D
M.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-30
11/2
3/11
`
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
13 o
f 27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
144
2. W
hile
SS
I soi
l pre
ssur
es o
btai
ned
usin
g bo
th th
e S
M a
nd th
e M
SM
wer
e in
gen
eral
co
mpa
rabl
e (S
ee F
igur
e 4.
13 o
f Jul
y 27
& 2
8 au
dit p
rese
ntat
ion,
SA
SS
I Iss
ues
Rai
sed
by th
e D
NFS
B L
ette
r to
DO
E),
the
resu
lts, p
rese
nted
at J
uly
27, a
udit,
did
not
fu
lly d
emon
stra
te a
ccep
tabi
lity
of th
e so
il pr
essu
re d
istri
butio
n ob
tain
ed fr
om e
ither
th
e M
SM
or S
M in
com
paris
on to
resu
lts o
btai
ned
from
the
DM
. STP
’s p
roje
ct s
peci
fic
conf
irmat
ion
of th
e M
SM
met
hod
(usi
ng C
B S
SI a
naly
sis)
or t
he S
SS
I ana
lysi
s pe
rform
ed fo
r one
mod
el (c
onsi
stin
g of
RW
B, R
SW
Tun
nel,
and
RB
) did
not
incl
ude
any
com
paris
on o
f the
tran
sfer
func
tions
of t
he s
oil p
ress
ure
para
met
er a
t the
in
tera
ctio
n no
des
at th
e ex
terio
r wal
ls a
nd th
e in
tera
ctin
g ad
jace
nt b
uild
ing
wal
ls. T
he
appl
ican
t is
requ
este
d to
furth
er d
emon
stra
te th
at th
e so
il pr
essu
re d
istri
butio
n ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e S
M o
r MS
M m
etho
d is
acc
epta
ble
and
is c
onse
rvat
ive
for u
se in
se
ism
ic d
esig
n.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-30
11/2
3/11
`
145
3. F
or S
SS
I ana
lysi
s (fo
r soi
l pre
ssur
e de
term
inat
ion
cons
ider
ing
inte
ract
ion
of
adja
cent
bui
ldin
g), o
nly
one
mod
el (c
onsi
stin
g of
RW
B, R
SW
Tun
nel,
and
RB
) was
ev
alua
ted
usin
g th
e D
M, S
M, a
nd M
SM
. STP
has
com
plet
ed th
e an
alys
is o
nly
for t
he
low
er b
ound
soi
l cas
e (U
B c
ase
usin
g ba
ckfil
l will
als
o be
per
form
ed).
Pre
limin
ary
resu
lts in
dica
te th
at a
bsol
ute
soil
pres
sure
pro
file
obta
ined
from
SM
and
MS
M in
so
me
inst
ance
s (p
artic
ular
ly fo
r ext
erio
r wal
ls) d
id n
ot c
ompa
re w
ell w
ith th
ose
obta
ined
from
the
DM
. How
ever
, max
imum
tota
l wal
l for
ce (o
btai
ned
from
the
TH
anal
ysis
) due
to s
oil p
ress
ure
in g
ener
al is
with
in 5
% fo
r all
thre
e m
etho
ds (T
able
5.1
of
Jul
y 27
& 2
8 au
dit p
rese
ntat
ion,
SA
SS
I Iss
ues
Rai
sed
by th
e D
NFS
B L
ette
r to
DO
E).
Bas
ed o
n th
is a
naly
sis,
STP
pre
limin
arily
con
clud
ed th
at th
e to
tal s
oil p
ress
ure
on th
e em
bedd
ed w
all o
btai
ned
from
SM
is a
ccep
tabl
e. H
owev
er, t
he a
pplic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to fu
rther
cla
rify
the
entri
es (i
nclu
ding
how
they
wer
e co
mpu
ted)
as
pres
ente
d in
Tab
le 5
.1 p
rovi
ded
by S
TP a
t Jul
y 27
Aud
it.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-30
11/2
3/11
`
146
4. T
he a
pplic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to re
asse
ss th
e se
ism
ic d
eman
d fo
r sta
bilit
y ev
alua
tion
of a
ny a
pplic
able
Cat
egor
y I a
nd II
/I st
ruct
ures
in li
ght o
f the
DN
FSB
issu
e an
d co
nfirm
acc
epta
bilit
y of
the
fact
ors
of s
afet
y ag
ains
t sta
bilit
y du
ring
an S
SE
.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-30
11/2
3/11
`
147
5. T
he a
pplic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to re
view
all
the
Pun
ch L
ist I
tem
s an
d an
y ap
plic
able
R
AI r
espo
nses
to d
eter
min
e if
any
of th
e re
spon
ses
prev
ious
ly p
rovi
ded
shou
ld b
e re
vise
d as
a re
sult
of th
e as
sess
men
t per
form
ed fo
r add
ress
ing
DN
FSB
issu
es.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-30
11/2
3/11
`
6. T
he is
sue
of z
ero
SS
SI p
ress
ure
on p
ortio
ns o
f the
RS
WP
H N
orth
wal
l (Fi
gure
3H
.6-2
19, l
ette
r U7-
C-N
INA
-NR
C-1
1009
6) w
as fu
rther
dis
cuss
ed w
ith S
TP a
t Jul
y 27
, 20
11 m
eetin
g. It
was
indi
cate
d th
at th
ere
is a
gap
at t
hese
loca
tions
bet
wee
n th
e R
SW
PT
sout
h w
all a
nd th
e R
SW
PH
nor
th w
all f
illed
by
the
com
pres
sibl
e m
ater
ial.
How
ever
, for
bet
ter c
larit
y an
d un
ders
tand
ing
of th
e an
alys
is m
odel
, STP
is re
ques
ted
to p
rovi
de a
n en
gine
erin
g sk
etch
sho
win
g ty
pica
l sec
tions
bet
wee
n th
e R
SW
PT
and
RS
WP
H in
clud
ing
the
tunn
el e
ntrie
s to
the
RS
WP
H.
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
14 o
f 27
Dec
embe
r 1, 2
011
NIN
A A
ctio
nN
RC
Act
ion
Act
ion
Clo
sed
Clo
sed
afte
r Pho
ne
Cal
l
Punc
hLi
stIte
mA
I No.
Cl I
Act
ion
Item
Des
crip
tion
Res
pons
ible
Eng
inee
rR
AI
Lette
r to
NR
CN
RC
Rev
iew
Punc
h Li
st fo
r Sou
th T
exas
Pro
ject
Uni
ts 3
& 4
Sect
ions
3.7
& 3
.8
In a
dditi
on it
was
not
ed th
at S
ectio
n 7
of F
igur
e 1
(see
sei
smic
soi
l pre
ssur
e ha
ndou
t of
Jul
y 27
& 2
8, 2
011
mee
ting)
was
cut
thro
ugh
RS
WP
H n
orth
wal
l, in
ter s
pace
be
twee
n th
e tu
nnel
ent
ries
to th
e R
SW
PH
nor
th w
all,
RS
W tu
nnel
cro
ss s
ectio
n, a
nd
othe
r bui
ldin
gs. H
owev
er F
igur
e 3H
.6-2
11 (s
ee le
tter U
7-C
-NIN
A-N
RC
-110
042
- 2D
S
SS
I mod
el o
f RS
WP
H, R
SW
PT,
DG
FOS
Vs,
and
RB
) ind
icat
es th
at th
e ac
tual
SS
SI
mod
el s
ectio
n ha
s be
en c
ut th
roug
h th
e tu
nnel
ent
ries
to th
e R
SW
PH
inst
ead
of th
e in
ter s
pace
bet
wee
n th
e tu
nnel
ent
ries
as d
epic
ted
in S
ectio
n 7.
Whi
le th
e S
SS
I m
odel
ana
lyze
d ap
pear
s to
be
cons
iste
nt w
ith th
e so
il pr
essu
re s
how
n in
Fig
ure
3H.6
-21
9, th
e re
sulti
ng S
SS
I pre
ssur
e m
ay n
ot c
onse
rvat
ivel
y re
pres
ent t
he in
tera
ctio
n pr
essu
re th
at c
ould
dev
elop
on
the
RS
WP
H N
orth
wal
l and
RS
WP
T so
uth
wal
l th
roug
h in
tera
ctio
n of
soi
l in
the
spac
e en
clos
ed b
y th
e tu
nnel
ent
ries,
RS
WP
H N
orth
w
all,
and
RS
WP
T so
uth
wal
l. Th
e ap
plic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to a
ddre
ss th
is is
sue
and
dem
onst
rate
that
SS
SI i
nter
actio
n pr
essu
re u
sed
for d
esig
n is
stil
l con
serv
ativ
e.
149
26
4. A
ccep
tanc
e of
sec
tion
cut f
orce
s ob
tain
ed fr
om S
AS
SI s
oil s
truct
ure
inte
ract
ion
(SS
I) an
alys
is fo
r stru
ctur
al d
esig
n (R
SW
pip
ing
tunn
el, d
iese
l gen
erat
or fu
el o
il tu
nnel
, die
sel g
ener
ator
fuel
oil
stor
age
vaul
t, an
d U
HS
/RS
W p
ump
hous
e).
5. R
efin
emen
t of S
SI m
odel
s to
ext
ract
sec
tion
cut f
orce
s fo
r stru
ctur
al e
valu
atio
n an
d de
sign
.
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-29
S212
/21/
11`
148
S&
LJa
vad
Mos
lem
ian
03.0
7.01
-30
11/2
3/11
`
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
15 o
f 27
Oct
ober
7, 2
011
Inco
nsis
tenc
ies
wer
e no
ted
amon
g va
rious
Sec
tions
of t
he F
SA
R c
once
rnin
g th
e sp
ecifi
ed d
esig
n gr
ound
wat
er le
vel a
nd th
e gr
ound
wat
er le
vel u
sed
in th
e se
ism
ic a
naly
sis
for C
ateg
ory
I stru
ctur
es.
For e
xam
ple
in F
SA
R S
ectio
n 2.
4S.1
2.5,
it is
sta
ted
that
“In
sum
mar
y, b
ased
on
mea
sure
d gr
ound
wat
er le
vels
in
obse
rvat
ion
wel
ls a
nd m
odel
ed p
ost-c
onst
ruct
ion
grou
ndw
ater
leve
ls, t
he m
axim
um p
ost-c
onst
ruct
ion
grou
ndw
ater
ele
vatio
n at
the
STP
Uni
ts 3
and
4 s
ite is
es
timat
ed to
be
28 ft
MS
L, a
s re
flect
ed in
Tab
le 2
.0-2
. Th
e no
min
al fi
nish
ed p
lant
gra
de in
the
pow
er b
lock
are
a is
app
roxi
mat
ely
34 ft
MS
L, s
ix fe
et h
ighe
r th
an th
e si
te c
hara
cter
istic
max
imum
gro
undw
ater
leve
l.” A
ppen
dix
3H.6
.4.2
.2, D
esig
n G
roun
d W
ater
Lev
el, a
lso
spec
ified
gro
und
wat
er le
vel a
t 28
MS
L es
tabl
ishi
n g th
e de
pth
of w
ater
tabl
e at
six
feet
belo
w th
e gr
ade.
H
owev
er, i
n S
ectio
n 3A
.15,
Site
Con
ditio
ns, i
t is
stat
ed th
at “
Bas
ed o
n th
e si
te g
roun
dwat
er c
ondi
tions
des
crib
ed in
FS
AR
Sub
sect
ion
2.4S
.12,
the
grou
ndw
ater
ele
vatio
n of
app
roxi
mat
ely
eigh
t fee
t be
low
gra
de w
as u
sed
in th
e an
alys
is to
det
erm
ine
the
soil
prop
ertie
s.”
It is
als
o no
ted
that
SS
I mod
el fo
r th
e se
ism
ic a
naly
sis
of C
ateg
ory
I stru
ctur
es c
onsi
dere
d th
e gr
ound
wat
er ta
ble
to b
e ap
prox
imat
ely
at e
ight
feet
bel
ow th
e gr
ade
elev
atio
n. A
s su
ch, t
he
appl
ican
t is
requ
este
d to
add
ress
thes
e in
cons
iste
ncie
s am
ong
vario
us s
ectio
ns o
f the
FS
AR
and
the
seis
mic
ana
lysi
s m
odel
and
revi
se th
e ap
plic
able
FS
AR
se
ctio
ns o
n gr
ound
wat
er le
vel a
nd s
truct
ural
des
ign
crite
ria.
The
appl
ican
t is
spec
ifica
lly re
ques
ted
to d
emon
stra
te th
at th
e FI
RS
, GM
RS
, and
the
resu
lts o
f se
ism
ic a
naly
sis
of th
e C
ateg
ory
I stru
ctur
es in
clud
ing
the
resu
lts o
f sta
bilit
y ca
lcul
atio
ns a
s cu
rren
tly e
stab
lishe
d in
the
CO
LA a
re n
ot a
dver
sely
affe
cted
and
in
clud
e th
is ju
stifi
catio
n in
the
appl
icab
le F
SA
R s
ectio
ns.
Rev
iew
of r
espo
nses
to R
AI 0
3.07
.01-
27, S
uppl
emen
ts 1
, Rev
isio
n 1
indi
cate
s th
at tw
o 2D
SS
SI m
odel
s (E
ast-W
est a
nd N
orth
-Sou
th S
ectio
ns) a
re a
naly
zed
to e
valu
ate
the
effe
cts
of n
earb
y st
ruct
ures
on
the
thre
e D
GFO
SV
s an
d ca
lcul
ate
the
seis
mic
soi
l pre
ssur
es. I
n th
e E
ast-W
est d
irect
ion
2-D
SS
SI D
GFO
SV
m
odel
(DG
FOT
1C +
DG
FOS
V 1
A +
CFR
W),
five
case
s of
soi
l and
bac
kfill
pro
perti
es a
re c
onsi
dere
d to
eva
luat
e th
e ef
fect
s of
the
soil
and
back
fill p
rope
rties
va
riatio
n. A
lso
resp
onse
to R
AI 0
3.07
.01-
27, S
uppl
emen
t 2, R
evis
ion
2 in
dica
tes
that
in th
e E
ast-W
est d
irect
ion
for D
GFO
T 1A
(RB
+ D
GFO
T 1A
+ C
FRW
), fiv
e ca
ses
are
run
with
var
ious
com
bina
tions
of s
oil a
nd b
ackf
ill p
rope
rties
. H
owev
er, i
n th
e N
orth
-Sou
th d
irect
ion
(UH
S/R
SWPH
+ R
SW T
unne
l + D
GFO
SV
1B +
DG
FOSV
1C
+ R
B),
only
one
cas
e w
as ru
n w
ith U
B s
oil p
rope
rties
.A
lso
as d
iscu
ssed
in re
spon
se to
RA
I 03.
07.0
2-24
, Sup
plem
ent 1
, Rev
isio
n 1,
in th
e E
ast-W
est d
irect
ion
for d
ynam
ic s
oil p
ress
ure
eval
uatio
n fo
r RS
W
Tunn
el a
nd R
WB
wal
ls, t
he 2
D S
SS
I mod
el (
RB
+ R
SW T
unne
l + R
WB
) inc
lude
d on
ly th
e U
B in
situ
soi
l with
out a
ny e
valu
atio
n fo
r bac
kfill
pro
perti
es.
As
such
, the
app
lican
t is
requ
este
d to
dem
onst
rate
that
con
side
ratio
n of
onl
y U
B s
oil p
rofil
e in
stea
d of
usi
ng a
com
bina
tion
of U
B s
oil a
nd b
ackf
ill p
aram
eter
s fo
r th
e ci
ted
case
s w
ill s
till b
e co
nser
vativ
e fo
r the
wal
l des
ign
of a
ll si
te s
peci
fic C
ateg
ory
I and
RW
B s
truct
ures
(UH
S/R
SW
PH
, DG
FOS
V, R
SW
Tun
nel,
UH
S/a
nd R
WB
). T
he a
pplic
ant i
s al
so re
ques
ted
to in
clud
e th
is e
valu
atio
n in
the
appl
icab
le s
ectio
ns o
f the
FS
AR
.
It is
not
cle
ar fr
om th
e de
scrip
tions
in th
e FS
AR
as
to h
ow th
e se
ism
ic d
eman
d is
det
erm
ined
for t
he s
ite-s
peci
fic s
tabi
lity
eval
uatio
n of
the
non-
seis
mic
II/I
stru
ctur
es c
onsi
derin
g th
e in
fluen
ce o
f nea
rby
heav
y st
ruct
ures
dur
ing
SS
E.
As
such
, the
app
lican
t is
requ
este
d to
des
crib
e in
suf
ficie
nt d
etai
l in
the
FSA
R
the
follo
win
g in
form
atio
n:
1.H
ow th
e in
put m
otio
n at
the
foun
datio
n le
vel o
f the
non
-sei
smic
II/I
stru
ctur
es a
re d
eter
min
ed u
sing
the
site
spe
cific
SS
E in
put s
pect
ra a
pplie
d at
the
grou
nd s
urfa
ce2.
How
the
effe
cts
of n
earb
y he
avy
stru
ctur
es a
re in
clud
ed in
the
inpu
t res
pons
e sp
ectra
for v
ario
us s
oil a
nd b
ackf
ill c
ondi
tions
3.D
emon
stra
te th
at h
oriz
onta
l inp
ut re
spon
se s
pect
ra a
t the
foun
datio
n le
vel o
f non
-sei
smic
II/I
stru
ctur
es is
bro
ad b
and
spec
tra w
ith p
eak
acce
lera
tion
grea
ter t
han
0.1g
and
env
elop
s FI
RS
4.Ty
pes
of s
eism
ic a
naly
sis
perfo
rmed
to d
eter
min
e se
ism
ic d
eman
d fo
r sta
bilit
y ev
alua
tion
(i.e.
, fix
ed b
ase
anal
ysis
, equ
ival
ent s
tatic
or d
ynam
ic a
naly
sis,
or
SS
I ana
lysi
s) a
nd h
ow th
e in
put i
s sp
ecifi
ed in
the
anal
ysis
5.
Incl
ude
5% d
ampe
d in
put r
espo
nse
spec
tra (v
ertic
al a
nd h
oriz
onta
l) as
am
plifi
ed b
y th
e pr
esen
ce o
f nea
rby
heav
y st
ruct
ures
use
d in
the
seis
mic
dem
and
eval
uatio
n fo
r site
-spe
cific
sta
bilit
y an
alys
is fo
r non
-sei
smic
II/I
stru
ctur
esD
iscu
ss o
r ref
er to
app
ropr
iate
FS
AR
sec
tion
of a
ny d
iffer
ence
s in
the
met
hod
of s
tabi
lity
eval
uatio
n fro
m th
at o
f Cat
egor
y 1
stru
ctur
es
Cla
rific
atio
ns fr
om N
RC
Issu
e 1
[Rec
eive
d 04
/04/
2011
] (A
udit
Act
ion
3.7-
7): R
evis
e A
ppen
dix
3A a
nd 3
H.6
to re
conc
ile g
roun
d w
ater
ele
vatio
n w
ith C
hapt
er 2
Issu
e 2
[Rec
eive
d 04
/04/
2011
] (A
udit
Act
ion
3.7-
6/3.
7-8/
3.7-
36):
Why
for S
SS
I of R
SW
Tun
nel w
as U
B in
situ
use
d vs
. UB
bac
kfill
soi
l?
Issu
e 3:
[R
ecei
ved
04/0
4/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] C
lear
ly d
escr
ibin
g in
the
FSA
R h
ow s
eism
ic d
eman
d fo
r non
-sei
smic
II/I
stru
ctur
es fo
r sta
bilit
y ev
alua
tion
is
Sout
h Te
xas
Proj
ect U
nits
3 &
4
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
16 o
f 27
Oct
ober
7, 2
011
Cla
rific
atio
ns fr
om N
RC
So
uth
Texa
s Pr
ojec
t Uni
ts 3
& 4
Des
igna
te w
heth
er th
e fri
ctio
n co
effic
ient
s re
porte
d in
Tab
le 3
H.6
-14
are
stat
ic o
r dyn
amic
coe
ffici
ent o
f fric
tion
valu
es.
Sec
tion
3H.6
.6.5
refe
rs to
Tab
le 3
H.6
-5 fo
r fac
tors
of s
afet
y ag
ains
t slid
ing
and
over
turn
ing
for R
SW
pip
ing
tunn
el.
How
ever
, Tab
le 3
H.6
-5 p
rovi
des
valu
es
for R
SW
pum
p ho
use.
Ple
ase
verif
y th
e ac
cept
abili
ty o
f thi
s re
fere
nce
Tabl
e.
In re
view
ing
the
SG
H S
AS
SI2
000
V&
V o
f the
sub
tract
ion
met
hod,
it w
as fo
und
that
the
test
pro
blem
s (S
AS
-3C
, SA
S-4
C a
nd S
AS
-8) a
re n
ot a
naly
zed
to
suffi
cien
tly h
igh
enou
gh fr
eque
ncie
s th
at c
an v
alid
ate
the
stab
ility
and
acc
urac
y of
the
subt
ract
ion
met
hod
for p
assi
ng fr
eque
ncy
of V
s/5h,
whe
re V
s is
the
low
est s
hear
wav
e ve
loci
ty o
f the
foun
datio
n m
edia
and
h is
the
larg
est e
lem
ent s
ize
in th
e so
il m
odel
.
In th
e ca
se o
f S&
L S
AS
SI2
000
V&
V T
est p
robl
ems
4 an
d 8
used
in v
alid
atio
n of
the
subt
ract
ion
met
hod,
the
anal
yses
wer
e ca
rrie
d ou
t to
suffi
cien
tly h
igh
frequ
enci
es to
cov
er th
e pa
ssin
g fre
quen
cy re
quire
men
t of V
s/5h.
How
ever
, the
con
clus
ion
does
not
add
ress
the
stab
ility
and
acc
urac
y of
the
subt
ract
ion
met
hod
used
in th
e co
ntex
t of t
he c
alcu
late
d re
sults
.
In b
oth
case
s, th
e ap
plic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to re
visi
t the
test
pro
blem
s an
d pr
ovid
e va
lidat
ion
that
ade
quat
ely
addr
esse
s th
e st
abili
ty a
nd a
ccur
acy
of th
e su
btra
ctio
n m
etho
d in
rela
tion
to th
e ac
cept
able
pas
sing
freq
uenc
y of
Vs/5
h us
ed in
the
STP
3&
4 de
sign
.
The
resp
onse
to R
AI.0
3.07
.02-
29, R
ev. 1
, doc
umen
ts a
dditi
onal
val
idat
ion
prob
lem
s fo
r SA
P 2
000.
The
val
idat
ions
incl
ude:
1)S
ectio
n cu
ts2)
Thic
k sh
ell o
ut-o
f-pla
ne re
spon
se3)
Tim
e hi
stor
y m
odal
sup
erpo
sitio
n w
ith s
hell
elem
ents
4)S
pect
ra c
alcu
latio
n us
ing
thic
k sh
ell e
lem
ents
Val
idat
ion
of it
em “1
” was
don
e by
han
d ca
lcul
atio
n. F
or it
ems
“2”,
“3” a
nd “4
”, th
e be
nchm
ark
solu
tions
for v
alid
atio
n w
ere
deve
lope
d w
ith A
NS
YS
util
izin
g “S
HE
LL43
“ele
men
t, w
hich
is w
ell s
uite
d to
mod
el li
near
, war
ped,
mod
erat
ely-
thic
k sh
ell s
truct
ures
acc
ordi
ng to
AN
SY
S U
ser’s
Man
ual.
For
item
s “2
”, “3
” and
“4
”, th
e fo
llow
ing
acce
ptan
ce c
riter
ia w
ere
used
: 5%
for f
requ
enci
es, 1
0% fo
r for
ces,
and
15%
for s
pect
ra.
The
5% d
iffer
ence
is c
onsi
dere
d ac
cept
able
w
ithin
the
engi
neer
ing
accu
racy
, whi
le th
e 10
% a
nd 1
5% c
riter
ia m
ay b
e ex
cess
ive.
The
app
lican
t is
requ
este
d to
ass
ess
the
impa
ct o
f the
abo
ve a
ccep
tanc
e cr
iteria
on
the
STP
3&
4 de
sign
.
Issu
e 6:
[Rec
eive
d 04
/04/
2011
] (A
udit
Act
ion
Item
3.7
-28)
SA
SS
I200
0 S
ubtra
ctio
n M
etho
d V
alid
atio
n
Issu
e 7:
[R
ecei
ved
04/0
4/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] S
AP
2000
V&
V
Issu
e 5:
[Rec
eive
d 04
/04/
2011
] (A
udit
Act
ion
Item
3.8
-8) R
efer
enci
ng T
able
3H
.6-5
Issu
e 4:
[Rec
eive
d 04
/04/
2011
] (A
udit
Act
ion
Item
3.8
-8) S
lidin
g Fr
ictio
n C
oeffi
cien
ts re
porte
d in
Tab
le 3
H.6
-14
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
17 o
f 27
Oct
ober
7, 2
011
Cla
rific
atio
ns fr
om N
RC
So
uth
Texa
s Pr
ojec
t Uni
ts 3
& 4
A b
rief p
rese
ntat
ion
of th
e st
abili
ty a
naly
sis
proc
edur
e w
as m
ade
by th
e ap
plic
ant d
urin
g th
e M
arch
14,
201
1 au
dit.
The
pre
sent
atio
n in
clud
ed a
rigi
d bo
dy
diag
ram
sho
win
g th
e fo
rces
act
ing
on th
e st
ruct
ure
for s
tabi
lity
calc
ulat
ions
. The
app
lican
t ind
icat
ed th
at th
e to
tal s
eism
ic d
eman
d is
cal
cula
ted
by s
umm
ing
all t
he in
ertia
forc
es a
nd m
omen
ts a
ctin
g on
the
stru
ctur
e. T
hese
iner
tia fo
rces
are
cal
cula
ted
by m
ultip
lyin
g th
e m
ass
of e
ach
node
by
the
abso
lute
val
ue o
f th
e m
axim
um a
ccel
erat
ion
resp
onse
at t
hat n
ode
obta
ined
from
the
SS
I ana
lysi
s.Th
e ca
lcul
atio
n of
the
seis
mic
ove
rturn
ing
mom
ent i
s ba
sed
on th
e ho
rizon
tal s
eism
ic lo
ad E
and
ver
tical
sei
smic
load
Ev
abou
t tip
ping
poi
nt A
, as
show
n in
th
e fig
ure
belo
w.
The
mom
ent d
ue to
hor
izon
tal e
arth
quak
e do
es n
ot in
clud
e E
v-H
(ver
tical
forc
e du
e to
hor
izon
tal i
nput
) whi
ch a
lso
prod
uces
ove
rturn
ing
mom
ent a
bout
A.
The
appl
ican
t is
requ
este
d to
pro
vide
just
ifica
tion
for n
ot in
clud
ing
the
verti
cal c
ompo
nent
of r
espo
nse
due
to h
oriz
onta
l sei
smic
inpu
t in
calc
ulat
ing
the
foun
datio
n ov
ertu
rnin
g m
omen
t.
E –
Hor
izon
tal s
eism
ic fo
rce
Ev –
Ver
tical
sei
smic
forc
eE
s – S
oil a
ctiv
e fo
rce
Ep –
Soi
l pas
sive
resi
stan
ceD
– 0
.9 o
f dea
d lo
adF b
– B
uoya
ncy
forc
eF r
–
Fric
tiona
l res
ista
nce
In D
GFO
SV
cal
cuat
ion
for S
SI a
naly
sis,
U7-
YA
RD
-C-C
ALC
-DE
SN
-600
1, R
ev. B
, the
refin
ed m
odel
spe
ctra
val
ues
are
14.6
% h
ighe
r at 3
.8 H
z. th
an th
ose
in
the
base
mod
el.
The
appl
ican
t is
requ
este
d to
pro
vide
just
ifica
tion
for r
econ
cilin
g th
is d
iffer
ence
.
Issu
e 8:
[Rec
eive
d 04
/04/
2011
] (A
udit
Act
ion
Item
3.7
-33
and
35)S
tabi
lity
Ana
lysi
s P
roce
dure
Issu
e 9:
[R
ecei
ved
04/1
3/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] D
GFO
SV
Cal
cula
tion
U7-
YA
RD
-C-C
ALC
-DE
SN
-600
1, R
ev. B
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
18 o
f 27
Oct
ober
7, 2
011
Cla
rific
atio
ns fr
om N
RC
So
uth
Texa
s Pr
ojec
t Uni
ts 3
& 4
The
seis
mic
des
ign
of th
e D
GFO
SV
is p
erfo
rmed
with
equ
ival
ent s
tatic
forc
es, w
here
by th
e in
ertia
l for
ces
are
com
pute
d as
pro
duct
s of
mas
ses
and
acce
lera
tions
. The
acc
eler
atio
ns a
re ta
ken
from
the
corr
espo
ndin
g S
SI a
naly
ses
as to
env
elop
e al
l soi
l con
ditio
ns, d
esig
n pa
ram
eter
s, a
nd s
eism
ic in
put
mot
ions
. The
mas
ses
are
dete
rmin
ed fo
rm th
e bu
ildin
g dr
awin
gs a
nd s
peci
fic w
eigh
ts fo
r con
cret
e, o
il, s
teel
and
soi
l. Th
e S
AP
stru
ctur
al m
odel
is d
ivid
ed in
to
regi
ons,
and
con
stan
t ave
rage
acc
eler
atio
n va
lues
are
app
lied
to e
ach
regi
on, s
imul
atin
g th
e ab
solu
te a
ccel
erat
ion
dist
ribut
ion
of th
e S
SI m
odel
. The
se
iner
tial f
orce
s ar
e ap
plie
d in
glo
bal X
, Y a
nd Z
dire
ctio
n as
ext
erna
l sta
tic lo
adin
g to
the
node
s an
d el
emen
ts o
f the
SA
P m
odel
. The
resp
onse
qua
ntiti
es, i
.e.
inte
rnal
forc
es, d
ispl
acem
ents
, etc
., re
sulti
ng fr
om e
ach
earth
quak
e co
mpo
nent
are
com
bine
d by
the
SR
SS
rule
. As
a ve
rific
atio
n of
the
equi
vale
nt s
tatic
pr
oced
ure,
the
resu
ltant
bas
e sh
ear,
tota
l ver
tical
bas
e fo
rce
and
over
turn
ing
mom
ents
obt
aine
d fro
m th
e S
AP
mod
el a
re c
ompa
red
to th
e co
rres
pond
ing
valu
es o
f the
SS
I (S
AS
SI)
mod
el. I
f req
uire
d, a
djus
tmen
t fac
tors
are
app
lied
to th
e in
put a
ccel
erat
ion
com
pone
nts
in S
AP
as
to p
rovi
de
base
forc
es a
nd m
omen
ts w
hich
env
elop
e th
e co
rres
pond
ing
SS
I bas
e va
lues
. The
max
imum
resu
ltant
SS
I abs
olut
e ac
cele
ratio
n va
lues
are
app
roxi
mat
ely:
X
=0.3
1g; Y
=0.3
1g a
nd Z
=0.3
3g. T
he e
quiv
alen
t hor
izon
tal a
ccel
erat
ion
valu
es o
btai
ned
from
the
SA
P a
naly
sis
are:
X=0
.33g
and
Y=0
.32g
and
ther
efor
e m
atch
clo
sely
the
SS
I acc
eler
atio
ns. T
he e
quiv
alen
t ver
tical
acc
eler
atio
n in
the
SA
P a
naly
sis
how
ever
, had
to b
e am
plifi
ed b
y a
fact
or o
f abo
ut 1
.27
to y
ield
Z=
0.42
g, in
ord
er to
mee
t the
tota
l bas
e fo
rces
and
mom
ents
from
the
SS
I ana
lysi
s. A
s bo
th, t
he S
AS
SI a
nd th
e S
AP
mod
els,
sho
uld
be b
ased
on
the
sam
e ge
omet
ry a
nd to
tal w
eigh
t and
are
sub
ject
to th
e sa
me
abso
lute
acc
eler
atio
ns, i
t is
not a
ppar
ent w
hy a
n ad
ditio
nal,
rela
tivel
y la
rge
ampl
ifica
tion
wou
ld b
e ne
eded
in v
ertic
al d
irect
ion
to o
btai
n co
mpa
rabl
e to
tal b
ase
seis
mic
load
s. T
here
fore
, the
app
lican
t is
requ
este
d to
pro
vide
a ju
stifi
catio
n re
gard
ing
the
diffe
rent
beh
avio
r of b
oth
stru
ctur
al m
odel
s.
Late
ral s
lidin
g st
abili
ty a
gain
st s
eism
ic lo
ads
is b
ased
on
soil
resi
stan
ce a
t the
foun
datio
n-so
il in
terfa
ce (f
rictio
n/ c
ohes
ion)
, and
on
late
ral e
arth
pre
ssur
es
actin
g on
the
embe
dded
bas
emen
t wal
ls. B
ased
on
anal
yses
and
test
ing,
dyn
amic
fric
tion
and
cohe
sion
val
ues
are
typi
cally
low
er th
an th
e co
rres
pond
ing
stat
ic v
alue
s. T
hus,
for t
he S
TP u
nits
, sta
tic c
ohes
ion
valu
es a
re re
duce
d 20
% to
acc
ount
for d
ynam
ic s
oil b
ehav
ior.
The
appl
ican
t’s ju
stifi
catio
n fo
r thi
s re
duct
ion
is b
ased
on
a pu
blic
atio
n by
Mak
disi
and
See
d fro
m J
uly
1978
, whi
ch s
tate
s th
at in
mos
t cas
es c
yclic
yie
ld s
treng
th o
f cla
yey
mat
eria
l app
ears
to b
e 80
% o
f the
sta
tic u
ndra
ined
stre
ngth
for t
ypic
al s
hear
stra
ins
obta
ined
from
ear
thqu
ake
soil
resp
onse
ana
lyse
s. A
ccor
ding
to th
e ab
ove
refe
renc
e, th
e dy
nam
ic re
duct
ion
of c
ohes
ion
stre
ngth
is s
how
n to
be
sign
ifica
ntly
affe
cted
by
the
stra
in le
vel p
rese
nt in
the
soil
laye
rs d
urin
g a
seis
mic
eve
nt. T
here
fore
, the
ap
plic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to p
rovi
de a
com
paris
on b
etw
een
the
stra
in ra
nges
ass
umed
in th
e ab
ove
refe
renc
e an
d th
e st
rain
val
ues
expe
cted
ben
eath
the
foun
datio
n of
Cat
I bu
ildin
gs o
f Uni
ts 3
&4.
App
lican
t is
requ
este
d to
exp
lain
the
appa
rent
dis
crep
ancy
with
the
3,00
0 ft/
sec
shee
r wav
e ve
loci
ty d
enot
ed in
the
CO
LA a
nd a
val
ue o
f 6,6
00 ft
/sec
use
d fo
r th
e w
ave
prop
ogat
ion
effe
ct in
the
calc
ulat
ions
.
Issu
e 10
: [R
ecei
ved
04/1
3/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] (
Issu
e 1
(New
)): C
alc
Rep
ort,
U7-
YA
RD
-S-C
ALC
-DE
SN
-600
1, R
ev. E
: “B
asic
Stru
ctur
al D
esig
n of
Die
sel G
ener
ator
Issu
e 12
: [R
ecei
ved
04/2
0/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] (
Act
ion
Item
3.8
-24)
RS
W T
unne
l Cal
cula
tions
Issu
e 11
: [R
ecei
ved
04/1
3/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] M
AC
TEC
Pre
sent
atio
n on
Fric
tion
and
Coh
esio
n V
alue
s us
ed in
Sta
bilit
y E
valu
atio
n of
R/B
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
19 o
f 27
Oct
ober
7, 2
011
Cla
rific
atio
ns fr
om N
RC
So
uth
Texa
s Pr
ojec
t Uni
ts 3
& 4
1. D
esig
n an
d A
naly
sis
( 3H
.3.5
.1 &
2)
Thes
e se
ctio
ns d
escr
ibe
the
seis
mic
and
stru
ctur
al a
naly
sis
of th
e R
W/B
, whe
reby
the
seis
mic
resp
onse
acc
eler
atio
ns a
re o
btai
ned
from
a fi
xed
base
stic
k m
odel
sub
ject
ed to
a 0
.15
RG
1.6
0 in
put g
roun
d m
otio
n sp
ectru
m. T
hese
acc
eler
atio
ns s
ubse
quen
tly a
re a
pplie
d to
a re
fined
3D
SA
P F
E m
odel
. The
ap
plic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to e
xpla
in w
hy u
sing
a fi
xed
base
mod
el w
as c
onsi
dere
d ad
equa
te.
Furth
erm
ore,
it is
not
cle
ar w
hat t
ype
of S
AP
ana
lysi
s w
as
perfo
rmed
and
how
the
resu
lts fr
om th
e se
ism
ic s
tick
mod
el a
naly
sis
wer
e ap
plie
d to
the
3D fi
nite
ele
men
t mod
el. C
larif
icat
ion
shou
ld b
e gi
ven
as to
how
lo
cal a
mpl
ifica
tion
effe
cts,
i.e.
of s
labs
and
wal
ls a
re c
onsi
dere
d in
the
desi
gn. I
n a
prev
ious
resp
onse
the
appl
ican
t sta
ted
that
the
influ
ence
of n
earb
y he
avy
build
ings
, i.e
. R/B
, on
the
seis
mic
inpu
t mot
ion
was
con
side
red.
The
app
lican
t is
requ
este
d to
incl
ude
in th
e FS
AR
how
the
effe
ct o
f the
adj
acen
t R/B
w
as c
onsi
dere
d in
the
inpu
t mot
ion
for t
he R
W/B
, and
to in
clud
e th
e in
put g
roun
d sp
ectra
for t
he a
ppro
pria
te d
ampi
ng u
sed
in d
esig
n of
the
RW
/B.
FSA
R T
able
3H
.3-1
pro
vide
s ve
rtica
l acc
eler
atio
ns fo
r the
RW
B a
t thr
ee fl
oor e
leva
tions
. It
is n
ot c
lear
why
hor
izon
tal a
ccel
erat
ions
are
not
incl
uded
in th
e FS
AR
. P
leas
e in
clud
e th
e ho
rizon
tal a
ccel
erat
ions
for t
he R
WB
in th
e FS
AR
.
2. II
/I A
naly
sis
and
desi
gn (3
H.3
.5.3
)FS
AR
Sec
tion
3H.3
.5.3
sta
tes
that
for I
I/I d
esig
n, th
e st
ruct
ure
is c
onse
rvat
ivel
y de
sign
ed to
rem
ain
elas
tic.
The
earth
quak
e in
put u
sed
at th
e fo
unda
tion
leve
l is
the
enve
lope
of 0
.3g
RG
1.6
0 re
spon
se s
pect
rum
and
the
indu
ced
acce
lera
tion
resp
onse
spe
ctru
m d
ue to
site
-spe
cific
SS
E.
How
ever
, the
FS
AR
do
es n
ot d
escr
ibe
how
the
seis
mic
ana
lysi
s an
d de
sign
is p
erfo
rmed
usi
ng th
e se
ism
ic in
put m
otio
n. P
leas
e de
scrib
e in
the
FSA
R h
ow s
eism
ic a
naly
sis
and
desi
gn is
per
form
ed fo
r the
RW
B fo
r II/I
des
ign.
3. L
oad
Com
bina
tion
for S
hear
(Ste
el) (
3H.3
.4.3
.4.2
)FS
AR
Sec
tion
3H.3
.4.3
.4.2
pro
vide
s lo
ad c
ombi
natio
ns fo
r stru
ctur
al s
teel
des
ign
for R
WB
. Th
e si
xth
load
com
bina
tion
has
a s
tress
coe
ffici
ent o
f 1.6
. A
ccor
ding
to A
NS
I/AIS
C N
690-
1994
(R20
04),
Sup
plem
ent 2
, Tab
le Q
1.5.
7.1,
Not
e g,
the
stre
ss li
mit
coef
ficie
nt in
she
ar s
hall
not e
xcee
d 1.
4 in
mem
bers
an
d bo
lts.
The
a ppl
ican
t is
requ
este
d to
not
e th
e ab
ove
limita
tion
in th
e FS
AR
.4.
Ulti
mat
e so
il be
arin
g ca
paci
ty (3
H.3
.4.2
.1)
This
sec
tion
show
s st
atic
and
dyn
amic
ulti
mat
e so
il be
arin
g ca
paci
ties
for t
he R
W/B
. The
app
lican
t is
requ
este
d to
sta
te in
the
FSA
R h
ow th
ese
valu
es w
ere
deriv
ed.
5. T
orna
do P
aram
eter
s (3
H.3
.B &
3H
.3.4
.3.3
.1)
Thes
e se
ctio
ns s
how
diff
eren
t par
amet
ers
to d
efin
e to
rnad
o lo
ads
whi
ch d
epen
d on
the
desi
gn g
oal.
The
Des
ign
Info
rmat
ion
Tabl
e pr
ovid
ed a
t the
Mar
20
11 A
udit
Mee
ting
diffe
rs fr
om th
e de
finiti
ons
in th
e FS
AR
text
and
pro
vide
s sp
ecifi
c de
sign
par
amet
ers
for t
hree
diff
eren
t situ
atio
ns: m
ain
desi
gn o
f the
st
ruct
ure,
sta
bilit
y an
alys
is a
nd II
/I de
sign
. The
app
lican
t is
requ
este
d to
reco
ncile
the
info
rmat
ion
in th
e FS
AR
text
with
the
cont
ents
of t
he D
esig
n In
form
atio
n Ta
ble,
and
to m
ake
refe
renc
e to
the
tabl
e if
it sh
ould
be
inco
rpor
ated
in th
e FS
AR
.
6. F
lood
Des
ign
(3H
.3.4
.2.3
)Th
is s
ectio
n de
fines
the
DB
F as
33
ft M
SL
and
is ta
ken
to c
orre
spon
d to
the
DC
D d
esig
n pa
ram
eter
for f
lood
ing
(one
ft b
elow
gra
de).
The
Des
ign
Info
rmat
ion
Tabl
e di
ffers
from
the
defin
ition
s in
the
FSA
R te
xt a
nd p
rovi
des
spec
ific
desi
gn p
aram
eter
s fo
r thr
ee d
iffer
ent s
ituat
ions
: mai
n de
sign
of t
he
stru
ctur
e, s
tabi
lity
anal
ysis
and
II/I
desi
gn. T
he a
pplic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to re
conc
ile th
e in
form
atio
n in
the
FSA
R te
xt w
ith th
e co
nten
ts o
f the
Des
ign
Info
rmat
ion
Tabl
e, a
nd to
mak
e re
fere
nce
to th
e ta
ble
if it
shou
ld b
e in
corp
orat
ed in
the
FSA
R.
Issu
e 13
: [R
ecei
ved
05/0
4/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] C
omm
ents
on
Res
pons
e to
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-18
R1
S2
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
20 o
f 27
Oct
ober
7, 2
011
Cla
rific
atio
ns fr
om N
RC
So
uth
Texa
s Pr
ojec
t Uni
ts 3
& 4
7. E
xtre
me
win
d an
d to
rnad
o lo
adin
g (3
H.6
.4.3
.2)
In it
s re
spon
se to
this
RA
I the
app
lican
t use
s C
riter
ion
4 of
SR
P 3
.3.1
to ju
stify
50
year
win
d ve
loci
ty in
the
win
d pr
essu
re e
quat
ion.
How
ever
the
staf
f not
es
that
Crit
erio
n 4
just
mea
ns th
at u
sing
tabl
e C
6-7
of A
SC
E 7
is a
ccep
tabl
e to
con
vert
50 y
ear i
nto
100
year
MR
I and
doe
s no
t ref
er to
the
impo
rtanc
e fa
ctor
, an
d th
at th
eref
ore
the
proc
edur
e is
not
con
sist
ent w
ith S
RP
3.3
.1, w
hich
requ
ires
a 10
0 ye
ar w
ind
in a
dditi
on to
the
impo
rtanc
e fa
ctor
of 1
.15.
Thi
s ap
proa
ch
was
als
o co
nfirm
ed d
urin
g th
e re
view
of F
SA
R s
ectio
n 3.
3.1.
In li
ght o
f rec
orde
d hu
rric
ane
velo
citie
s ex
ceed
ing
134
mph
at t
he s
ite, t
he s
taff
need
s to
fu
rther
eva
luat
e th
is d
evia
tion
from
the
SR
P re
quire
men
ts. T
he s
taff
also
not
ed th
at th
e S
RP
3.3
.2 d
esig
n re
quire
men
ts a
re m
et fo
r tor
nado
load
ings
(in
clud
ing
the
impo
rtanc
e fa
ctor
of 1
.15)
, and
that
the
torn
ado
desi
gn th
us fo
llow
s th
e S
RP
reco
mm
enda
tions
.
8. F
ound
atio
n be
arin
g pr
essu
res
reco
ncili
atio
nIn
its
resp
onse
to th
is R
AI t
he a
pplic
ant s
tate
s th
at th
e sl
ab e
dges
hav
e to
be
fixed
in o
rder
to p
erfo
rm th
e ve
rific
atio
n an
alys
is. T
he a
pplic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to
expl
ain
this
app
roac
h, e
spec
ially
if b
ound
ary
cond
ition
s w
hich
do
not r
efle
ct re
al c
ondi
tions
are
goi
ng to
be
intro
duce
d in
the
anal
ysis
. All
poss
ible
load
ec
cent
riciti
es (p
lus
/ min
us c
ompo
nent
s) n
eed
to b
e ve
rifie
d. J
ustif
icat
ion
is n
eede
d to
bas
e th
e ve
rific
atio
n on
onl
y on
e lo
ad c
ombi
natio
n (w
ith th
e lo
wes
t sa
fety
fact
or).
9. C
oeffi
cien
t of F
rictio
nIn
its
resp
onse
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-19
, Sup
plem
ent 1
, dat
ed A
pril
25, 2
011,
the
appl
ican
t add
ress
ed th
e is
sue
of c
oeffi
cien
t of f
rictio
n ra
ised
in a
udit
item
3.8
-8.
The
appl
ican
t rev
ised
the
site
-spe
cific
ITA
AC
to re
quire
the
wat
erpr
oofin
g m
embr
ane
to h
ave
a m
inim
um s
tatic
coe
ffici
ent o
f fric
tion
of 0
.75,
and
als
o pr
ovid
ed a
Tab
le th
at s
peci
fies
that
the
conc
rete
to c
oncr
ete
inte
rface
join
ts w
ill b
e in
tent
iona
lly ro
ughe
ned
to h
ave
a m
inim
um s
tatic
coe
ffici
ent o
f fric
tion
of
0.75
. H
owev
er, t
he a
pplic
ant d
id n
ot e
xpla
in h
ow th
e sp
ecifi
ed m
inim
um s
tatic
coe
ffici
ent o
f fric
tion
at th
e va
rious
inte
rface
s, s
peci
fical
ly a
t the
w
ater
proo
fing
mem
bran
e, w
as c
ompa
red
with
the
dyna
mic
coe
ffici
ent o
f fric
tion
of 0
.47
assu
med
for s
oil,
and
cons
ider
ed a
ccep
tabl
e. A
lso,
the
requ
irem
ent
of in
tent
iona
lly ro
ughe
ning
the
conc
rete
sur
face
sho
uld
be in
clud
ed in
the
FSA
R.
1. F
SA
R S
ectio
n 3H
.6.4
.3.3
.3 re
fers
to F
igur
e 3H
.6-4
4 an
d Fi
gure
s 3H
.6-2
45 th
roug
h 3H
.6-2
47 fo
r lat
eral
soi
l pre
ssur
e fo
r des
ign
of R
SW
Pip
ing
Tunn
els.
It
is n
ot c
lear
why
Fig
ures
3H
.6-2
12 th
roug
h 3H
.6-2
17, w
hich
pro
vide
s la
tera
l soi
l pre
ssur
e on
RS
W T
unne
ls c
onsi
derin
g ef
fect
s fro
m a
djac
ent R
B a
nd
RW
B, a
re n
ot in
clud
ed h
ere.
2. F
i gur
e 3H
.6-4
4 in
the
Rev
iew
er’s
Gui
de d
id n
ot in
clud
e th
e co
ordi
nate
axe
s.3.
Fi g
ures
3H
.6-1
38 a
nd 1
39 a
re n
ot c
lear
, and
, at l
east
, the
ZP
A v
alue
s sh
ould
be
anno
tate
d in
the
Figu
res.
4. P
leas
e de
scrib
e if
stat
ic s
urch
arge
pre
ssur
es fr
om a
djac
ent b
uild
ings
wer
e co
nsid
ered
in d
esig
n.5.
For
cla
rity,
Fig
ure
3H.6
-137
sho
uld
be a
ppro
pria
tely
ann
otat
ed re
gard
ing
its a
pplic
abili
ty.
6. P
leas
e cl
arify
if th
e de
sign
tabl
e pr
ovid
ed to
us
is g
oing
to b
e in
clud
ed in
the
FSA
R.
Bec
ause
of t
he c
ompl
exity
of t
he v
ario
us lo
adin
gs u
sed
for t
he
sam
e bu
ildin
g fo
r var
ious
type
s of
ana
lysi
s, it
is s
trong
ly re
com
men
ded
that
this
tabl
e be
incl
uded
in th
e FS
AR
.
CO
LA M
arku
p, S
ectio
n 3H
.6.6
.2.1
UH
S ba
sin,
UH
S C
oolin
g To
wer
Enc
losu
re, a
nd R
SW P
ump
Hou
seTh
e ca
lcul
ated
sei
smic
soi
l pre
ssur
es o
n th
e R
SW
Pum
p H
ouse
Nor
th W
all s
how
n in
Fig
ure
3H.6
-219
from
2D
SS
SI a
naly
sis
with
oth
er b
uild
ings
sho
w a
si
gnifi
cant
spi
ke a
t dep
ths
of a
bout
10
to 1
3 ft
belo
w g
rade
with
the
pres
sure
s fa
lling
to z
ero
from
abo
ut 1
3 to
44
ft be
low
gra
de c
orre
spon
ding
to th
e bo
ttom
of
RS
W p
ipin
g tu
nnel
. Ple
ase
prov
ide
expl
anat
ion
for t
his
pres
sure
dis
tribu
tion.
CO
LA M
arku
p, S
ectio
n 3H
.6.5
.3 S
eism
ic A
naly
sis
of R
SW
Pip
ing
Tunn
elIn
the
4th
bulle
t on
the
follo
win
g pa
ge (P
age
11 o
f 27)
, ple
ase
clar
ify fo
r whi
ch s
oil c
ase
the
crac
ked
conc
rete
and
soi
l sep
arat
ion
anal
ysis
was
per
form
ed.
This
info
rmat
ion
is n
ot p
rovi
ded
in th
e C
OLA
mar
kup.
Issu
e 16
: [R
ecei
ved
05/0
9/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] C
omm
ents
on
Res
pons
e to
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-19
, Sup
plem
ent 1
Issu
e 17
[Rec
eive
d 05
/09/
2011
; New
Act
ion
Item
] Mis
cella
neou
s Q
uest
ions
from
Aud
it an
d R
evie
wer
s G
uide
Issu
e 18
: [R
ecei
ved
05/1
9/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] C
omm
ents
on
Res
pons
e to
RA
I 03.
07.0
2-22
Issu
e 19
: [R
ecei
ved
05/1
9/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] C
omm
ents
on
Res
pons
e to
RA
I 03.
07.0
2-24
,
Issu
e 14
: [R
ecei
ved
05/0
4/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] C
omm
ents
on
Res
pons
e to
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-30
S1
Issu
e 15
: [R
ecei
ved
05/0
4/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] C
omm
ents
on
Res
pons
e to
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-35
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
21 o
f 27
Oct
ober
7, 2
011
Cla
rific
atio
ns fr
om N
RC
So
uth
Texa
s Pr
ojec
t Uni
ts 3
& 4
CO
LA M
arku
p, S
ectio
n 3H
.6.7
Die
sel G
ener
ator
Fue
l Oil
Stor
age
Vaul
t (D
GFO
SV)
The
seco
nd a
nd th
ird p
arag
raph
s (P
age
38 o
f 54)
dis
cuss
two
diffe
rent
type
s of
inpu
t mot
ions
bei
ng d
evel
oped
for t
he s
eism
ic a
naly
sis
and
desi
gn o
f D
GFO
SV
. P
leas
e pr
ovid
e fu
rther
cla
rific
atio
ns w
hy tw
o di
ffere
nt in
put m
otio
ns a
re d
evel
oped
and
use
d in
sep
arat
e S
SI a
naly
ses
of D
GFO
SV
, as
disc
usse
d in
the
first
par
agra
ph o
n th
e fo
llow
ing
page
(Pag
e 39
of 5
4).
Post
Aud
it C
larif
icat
ion
Issu
e #
6
In re
spon
se to
Pos
t Aud
it C
larif
icat
ion
Issu
e #6
sub
mitt
ed a
s pa
rt of
the
resp
onse
to R
AI 0
3.07
.02-
29, S
uppl
emen
t 1 (s
ubm
itted
with
lette
r U7-
C-N
INA
-NR
C-
1100
75),
the
appl
ican
t has
pro
vide
d co
mpa
rison
s of
the
resp
onse
tran
sfer
func
tions
of a
circ
ular
em
bedd
ed fo
unda
tion
over
ela
stic
hal
f spa
ce to
theo
retic
al
solu
tions
to v
alid
ate
the
accu
racy
and
sta
bilit
y of
the
SA
SS
I200
0 su
btra
ctio
n m
etho
d. T
he re
spon
se c
ompa
rison
s co
ver a
freq
uenc
y ra
nge
corr
espo
ndin
g to
ao
val
ues
less
than
3, w
here
ao i
s a
dim
ensi
onle
ss p
aram
eter
equ
al to
2�
fr/V
s, f i
s th
e fre
quen
cy o
f ana
lysi
s, r
is th
e ra
dius
of f
ound
atio
n an
d V
sis
the
shea
r w
ave
velo
city
of f
ound
atio
n m
edia
. Th
e ap
plic
ant h
as s
tate
d th
at c
ompa
rison
s of
the
resp
onse
tran
sfer
func
tions
for a
o >3
is n
ot p
erfo
rmed
bec
ause
th
eore
tical
sol
utio
ns o
btai
ned
for s
imila
r pro
blem
s by
Aps
el &
Luc
o, 1
986
are
in a
gree
men
t with
the
resu
lts o
f Day
, 197
8 fo
r ao
less
than
abo
ut 3
, but
the
resu
lts s
tart
devi
atin
g at
ao
of h
ighe
r tha
n 3.
The
site
-spe
cific
Sei
smic
Cat
egor
y I s
truct
ures
at t
he S
TP 3
and
4 s
ites,
suc
h as
UH
S B
asin
/RS
W P
ump
Hou
se, a
re g
ener
ally
larg
e st
ruct
ures
with
si
gnifi
cant
foun
datio
n fo
otpr
int.
For
exa
mpl
e, U
HS
Bas
in h
as a
foun
datio
n fo
otpr
int o
f app
roxi
mat
ely
275
ft x
140
ft. W
ith a
n eq
uiva
lent
foun
datio
n ra
dius
of
110
ft, a
nd a
ssum
ing
an a
vera
ge s
hear
wav
e ve
loci
ty o
f abo
ut 1
000
ft/se
c an
d a
cut-o
ff fre
quen
cy o
f abo
ut 2
2Hz
used
in th
e S
SI a
naly
sis,
the
corr
espo
ndin
g ao
val
ue fo
r thi
s st
ruct
ure
is c
alcu
late
d to
be
on th
e or
der o
f abo
ut 1
5 w
hile
the
test
pro
blem
s ar
e ca
rrie
d ou
t to
ao v
alue
s le
ss th
an 3
. B
ecau
se th
e sh
ape
of th
e re
spon
se tr
ansf
er fu
nctio
ns a
re s
trong
ly d
epen
dent
on
the
ao v
alue
(e.g
. as
show
n in
Fig
. 03.
07.0
2-29
S1.
6 pr
ovid
ed w
ith th
is
resp
onse
), th
e ap
plic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to e
xten
d th
e re
sults
of t
he a
bove
test
pro
blem
s in
term
s of
the
foun
datio
n re
spon
se tr
ansf
er fu
nctio
ns (i
nclu
ding
bot
h co
mpl
ianc
e an
d sc
atte
ring
func
tions
) cal
cula
ted
usin
g th
e su
btra
ctio
n m
etho
d to
ao v
alue
s up
to a
t lea
st 8
. The
insp
ectio
n of
the
resu
lts is
nec
essa
ry to
en
sure
the
accu
racy
and
sta
bilit
y of
the
subt
ract
ion
met
hod
used
for a
naly
sis
of la
rge
embe
dded
stru
ctur
es. T
heor
etic
al c
lose
d-fo
rm s
olut
ions
are
ava
ilabl
e fo
r co
mpa
rison
to a
o val
ues
of 6
to 8
.
The
Def
ense
Nuc
lear
Fac
ilitie
s S
afet
y B
oard
(DN
FSB
) iss
ued
a le
tter o
n A
pril
8th,
201
1 re
ques
ting
the
Dep
artm
ent o
f Ene
rgy
(DO
E) t
o ad
dres
s te
chni
cal
and
softw
are
qual
ity a
ssur
ance
issu
es re
late
d to
pot
entia
lly e
rron
eous
sei
smic
ana
lyse
s pe
rform
ed u
sing
the
SA
SS
I Sub
tract
ion
met
hod.
SA
SS
I su
btra
ctio
n m
etho
d ha
s be
en u
sed
for S
TP a
pplic
atio
n fo
r em
bedd
ed s
truct
ures
. A
s su
ch, t
he a
pplic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to re
view
thes
e co
ncer
ns a
nd a
sses
s th
e po
tent
ial i
mpa
ct o
n S
TP’s
sei
smic
ana
lysi
s.
Issu
e 21
: [R
ecei
ved
05/1
9/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] C
omm
ents
on
Res
pons
e to
RA
I 03.
07.0
2-29
,
Issu
e 20
: [R
ecei
ved
05/1
9/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] C
omm
ents
on
Res
pons
e to
RA
I 03.
07.0
1-27
,
Issu
e 22
: [R
ecei
ved
05/1
9/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] D
NFS
B Is
sues
Rel
ated
to th
e SA
SSI S
ubtr
actio
n M
etho
d
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
22 o
f 27
Oct
ober
7, 2
011
Cla
rific
atio
ns fr
om N
RC
So
uth
Texa
s Pr
ojec
t Uni
ts 3
& 4
In it
s re
spon
se to
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-33
with
lette
r U7-
C-S
TP-N
RC
-100
208
Atta
chm
ent 2
1 P
age
3 of
7, t
he a
pplic
ant s
tate
d th
at: “
App
endi
x B
- S
teel
E
mbe
dmen
ts, i
nclu
des
chan
ges
in A
CI 3
49-9
7 ba
sed
on la
ter r
esea
rch.
The
cha
nges
in A
ppen
dix
B a
re fo
r the
loca
l des
ign
of e
mbe
dmen
t pla
tes
and
do
not a
ffect
the
desi
gn o
f the
maj
or c
oncr
ete
elem
ents
. Add
ition
ally
, the
sup
plem
enta
l req
uire
men
ts d
efin
ed in
the
Sta
ff P
ositi
ons
in D
CD
Tab
le 3
.8 -1
0 w
ill
have
a la
rger
impa
ct o
n th
e em
bedm
ent d
esig
n.”
It ap
pear
s th
at th
e ap
plic
ant i
s co
mpa
ring
the
prov
isio
ns o
f AC
I 349
-97,
App
endi
x B
, with
thos
e of
the
AB
WR
DC
D T
able
3.8
-10.
How
ever
, AC
I 349
-97,
A
ppen
dix
B w
as n
ot e
ndor
sed
by th
e N
RC
.
In it
s ev
alua
tion
the
staf
f not
ed th
at a
ccor
ding
to F
SA
R, R
ev. 0
4, T
able
1.8
-20,
RG
1.1
42 is
cha
nged
to R
evis
ion
2, N
ov 2
001,
whi
ch e
ndor
ses
AC
I 349
-97
with
the
exce
ptio
n of
App
endi
x B
(Anc
horin
g to
Con
cret
e): “
This
regu
lato
ry g
uide
del
inea
tes
the
exte
nt to
whi
ch A
CI 3
49-9
7, e
xcep
t for
App
endi
x B
, "S
teel
E
mbe
dmen
ts,"
is a
ccep
tabl
e to
the
NR
C s
taff.
In a
sep
arat
e ac
tion,
the
staf
f int
ends
to e
ndor
se A
ppen
dix
B o
f AC
I 349
-97
in a
regu
lato
ry g
uide
that
is b
eing
de
velo
ped
to a
ddre
ss a
ncho
ring
com
pone
nts
and
stru
ctur
al s
uppo
rts in
con
cret
e.”
SR
P 3
.8.3
, II.2
, Rev
2, M
arch
200
7 lis
ts u
nder
app
licab
le c
odes
AC
I 349
as
supp
lem
ente
d w
ith a
dditi
onal
gui
danc
e by
RG
1.1
42 a
nd 1
.199
.
SR
P 3
.8.4
, II.4
(A),
Rev
2, M
arch
200
7 lis
ts a
s ac
cept
ance
crit
eria
: “Fo
r con
cret
e st
ruct
ures
, the
pro
cedu
res
are
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith A
CI 3
49, a
s su
pple
men
ted
by R
G 1
.142
. The
des
ign
and
anal
ysis
of a
ncho
rs (s
teel
em
bedm
ents
) use
d fo
r com
pone
nt a
nd s
truct
ural
sup
ports
on
conc
rete
stru
ctur
es a
re
acce
ptab
le if
foun
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
App
endi
x B
to A
CI 3
49, a
s su
pple
men
ted
by R
G 1
.199
.”
RG
1.1
99, N
ov. 2
003,
und
er C
. Reg
ulat
ory
Pos
ition
, sta
tes:
“1. T
he p
roce
dure
s an
d st
anda
rds
of A
ppen
dix
B to
AC
I 349
-01
are
acce
ptab
le to
the
NR
C s
taff
as d
escr
ibed
and
sup
plem
ente
d be
low
. The
reco
mm
enda
tions
are
app
licab
le to
the
type
s of
anc
hors
dis
cuss
ed in
Sec
tion
B.1
, "D
efin
ition
s," a
nd B
.2,
“Sco
pe,”
of A
ppen
dix
B to
AC
I 349
-01.
”
Sin
ce R
G 1
.199
is n
ot li
sted
in F
SA
R, R
ev. 4
, Tab
le 1
.8-2
0 as
an
appl
icab
le g
uida
nce
to S
TP 3
&4,
the
appl
ican
t is
requ
este
d to
cla
rify
whi
ch p
rovi
sion
s ar
e be
ing
used
for s
teel
em
bedm
ents
for b
oth
the
stan
dard
pla
nt s
truct
ures
and
the
site
-spe
cific
stru
ctur
es.
Issu
e 23
: [R
ecei
ved
06/2
9/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] F
ollo
w-u
p Q
uest
ion
to R
AI 0
3.08
.04-
33 R
egar
ding
Con
cret
e Em
bedm
ent D
esig
n C
odes
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
23 o
f 27
Oct
ober
7, 2
011
Cla
rific
atio
ns fr
om N
RC
So
uth
Texa
s Pr
ojec
t Uni
ts 3
& 4
Bas
ed o
n ex
cerp
ts fr
om d
ocum
ents
U7-
RW
B-S
-GD
D-6
001
and
2008
-097
34, w
e ha
ve th
e fo
llow
ing
prel
imin
ary
com
men
ts.
RA
I 599
1 ha
s be
en is
sued
in
Lette
r 384
on
the
sam
e su
bjec
t (pr
ovid
e ba
ckgr
ound
doc
umen
t to
just
ify R
WB
cla
ssifi
catio
n of
IIb
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith R
G 1
.143
) for
NIN
A a
ctio
n. C
omm
ents
: 1.
The
use
of a
n S
RP
11.
2, B
TP 1
1-6
cons
eque
nce
anal
ysis
of r
adw
aste
tank
failu
res
is n
ot a
ppro
pria
te s
ince
the
asse
ssm
ent a
ddre
sses
offs
ite im
pact
s fo
r som
eone
ass
umed
to c
onsu
me/
use
grou
nd o
r sur
face
wat
er, e
ither
dire
ctly
(drin
king
) or i
ndire
ctly
(ing
redi
ent i
n fo
od p
rodu
cts
or fo
r liv
esto
ck w
ater
ing)
. B
TP 1
1-6
is c
lear
on
this
and
as
wel
l as
the
type
of r
adio
logi
cal a
naly
sis
that
nee
d to
be
perfo
rmed
. 2.
RG
1.1
43 a
ddre
sses
itse
lf to
dos
es fo
r som
eone
loca
ted
in th
e un
prot
ecte
d ar
ea a
nd fo
r pla
nt w
orke
rs.
RG
1.1
43, R
eg. P
ositi
on C
.5 a
nd F
ig. 1
are
cl
ear o
n th
is.
3.
Th
e ac
cept
ance
crit
eria
are
diff
eren
t: B
TP 1
1-6
appl
ies
Par
t 20,
App
. B li
quid
EC
Ls f
or m
embe
rs o
f the
pub
lic.
RG
1.1
43 a
pplie
s a
dose
of 5
00 m
rem
fo
r som
eone
loca
ted
in th
e un
prot
ecte
d ar
ea a
nd 5
rem
for w
orke
rs.
4.
Th
e de
velo
pmen
t of t
he ra
dioa
ctiv
e so
urce
term
s ar
e di
ffere
nt: B
TP 1
1-6
focu
ses
on a
sin
gle
tank
with
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
max
imum
exp
ecte
d ra
dio
5.
W
ith re
spec
t to
RG
1.2
06, P
art I
, C.I.
3 an
d S
RP
Sec
tions
3.2
.2 a
nd 3
.8.4
:
RG
1.2
06, S
ectio
n 3.
2.2
stat
es:
“The
app
lican
t sho
uld
indi
cate
the
exte
nt to
whi
ch it
has
follo
wed
the
reco
mm
enda
tions
of R
G 1
.26,
RG
1.1
43, a
nd R
G 1
.151
. The
app
lican
t sho
uld
iden
tify
any
diffe
renc
es b
etw
een
the
reco
mm
enda
tions
and
its
appl
icat
ion
and
just
ify e
ach
prop
osed
qua
lity
grou
p cl
assi
ficat
ion
in te
rms
of th
e re
lianc
e pl
aced
on
thos
e sy
stem
s th
at p
erfo
rm a
ny o
f the
follo
win
g fu
nctio
ns:
(1) p
reve
nt o
r miti
gate
the
cons
eque
nces
of a
ccid
ents
and
mal
func
tions
orig
inat
ing
with
in th
e R
CP
B(2
) per
mit
reac
tor s
hutd
own
and
mai
nten
ance
in th
e sa
fe s
hutd
own
cond
ition
(3) c
onta
in ra
dioa
ctiv
e m
ater
ial
For s
uch
syst
ems,
the
appl
ican
t sho
uld
spec
ify th
e pr
opos
ed d
esig
n fe
atur
es a
nd m
easu
res
that
it w
ould
app
ly to
atta
in a
qua
lity
leve
l equ
ival
ent t
o th
e le
vel
of th
e R
G 1
.26,
RG
1.1
43 a
nd R
G 1
.151
cla
ssifi
catio
ns (a
s ap
plic
able
), in
clud
ing
the
QA
pro
gram
s th
at w
ould
be
impl
emen
ted.
” 6.
SR
P S
ectio
n 3.
8.4
iden
tifie
s R
G 1
.143
as
an a
pplic
able
acc
epta
nce
crite
ria in
eva
luat
ing
othe
r stru
ctur
es a
nd n
ot S
RP
11.
2, B
TP 1
1-6.
Issu
e 24
: [R
ecei
ved
08/1
8/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] F
ollo
w-u
p D
iscu
ssio
n to
RA
I 03.
08.0
4-37
Reg
ardi
ng R
adw
aste
Bui
ldin
g C
lass
iific
atio
n
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
24 o
f 27
Oct
ober
7, 2
011
Cla
rific
atio
ns fr
om N
RC
So
uth
Texa
s Pr
ojec
t Uni
ts 3
& 4
1.
C
B/R
B d
epar
ture
ass
essm
ent u
sed
Dire
ct M
etho
d (D
M).
Wha
t was
the
met
hod
of a
naly
sis
for R
B/C
B S
SS
I dep
artu
re a
sses
smen
t (S
M o
r DM
)? I
f S
M w
as u
sed,
nee
d so
me
just
ifica
tion
that
use
of S
M fo
r the
SS
SI d
epar
ture
ass
essm
ent i
s ac
cept
able
. 2.
SS
I ana
lysi
s of
DG
FOT
used
SA
SS
I DM
. D
GFO
T an
alys
is is
bei
ng re
peat
ed u
sing
DM
to e
xtra
ct s
eism
ic S
SI s
oil p
ress
ure.
Thi
s is
acc
epta
ble
for
dete
rmin
atio
n of
SS
I pre
ssur
e, s
truct
ural
resp
onse
qua
ntiti
es, a
nd IS
RS
. H
owev
er, t
he a
pplic
ant s
houl
d de
mon
stra
te th
at th
e se
ism
ic in
put (
i.e.,
ampl
ified
in
put s
pect
ra d
ue to
pre
senc
e of
the
near
by h
eavy
stru
ctur
es) u
sed
for S
SI a
naly
sis
of D
GFO
T is
not
affe
cted
whe
n m
odifi
ed s
ubtra
ctio
n m
etho
d (M
SM
) is
used
for t
he re
anal
ysis
(to
addr
ess
DN
FSB
issu
es) o
f the
nea
rby
heav
y st
ruct
ures
.
3.
S
SI a
naly
sis
for t
he R
SW
PT
used
DM
. Th
is is
acc
epta
ble
for d
eter
min
atio
n of
SS
I pre
ssur
e (n
eed
to v
erify
whe
ther
SS
I soi
l pre
ssur
e w
as e
xtra
cted
fro
m th
e D
M),
stru
ctur
al re
spon
se q
uant
ities
, and
ISR
S.
How
ever
, the
app
lican
t sho
uld
dem
onst
rate
that
the
seis
mic
inpu
t (i.e
., am
plifi
ed in
put s
pect
ra d
ue
to p
rese
nce
of th
e ne
arby
hea
vy s
truct
ure)
use
d fo
r SS
I ana
lysi
s of
RS
WP
T is
not
affe
cted
whe
n M
SM
is u
sed
for t
he re
anal
ysis
(to
addr
ess
DN
FSB
issu
es) o
f the
nea
rby
heav
y st
ruct
ures
.
4.
Fo
r UH
S/R
SW
PH
, SS
I ana
lysi
s is
bei
ng re
peat
ed u
sing
MS
M.
ISR
S b
ased
on
SM
will
be
mod
ified
as
a re
sult
of th
e ne
w a
naly
sis
resu
lts b
ased
on
MS
M.
Stru
ctur
al d
esig
n ba
sed
on S
M re
mai
ns u
ncha
nged
. A
sses
smen
t of t
he Im
pact
of M
SM
on
the
desi
gn o
f bea
ms
and
colu
mn
with
in th
e ba
sin
is n
ot
com
plet
e. S
TP d
id n
ot p
erfo
rm a
dire
ct e
valu
atio
n of
the
desi
gn o
f the
sel
ecte
d pa
nels
of U
HS
/RS
W P
ump
Hou
se u
sing
the
mod
ified
ave
rage
acc
eler
atio
ns
obta
ined
from
the
MS
M.
Inst
ead,
STP
use
d a
mar
gin
anal
ysis
bas
ed o
n th
e S
SI T
H a
naly
sis
and
the
equi
vale
nt s
tatic
met
hod
used
in th
e de
sign
. S
taff
indi
cate
d th
at w
hile
equ
ival
ent s
tatic
ana
lysi
s ge
nera
lly y
ield
s co
nser
vativ
e re
sults
, it w
ill fu
rther
ass
ess
the
use
of th
is a
ppro
ach
from
des
ign
stan
dpoi
nt fo
r ac
cept
abili
ty.
5.
W
hile
SS
I soi
l pre
ssur
es o
btai
ned
usin
g bo
th th
e S
M a
nd th
e M
SM
wer
e in
gen
eral
com
para
ble
(See
Fig
ure
4.13
of J
uly
27 p
rese
ntat
ion)
, the
resu
lts,
pres
ente
d at
Jul
y 27
, aud
it, d
id n
ot fu
lly d
emon
stra
te a
ccep
tabi
lity
of th
e so
il pr
essu
re o
btai
ned
from
eith
er th
e M
SM
or S
M in
com
paris
on to
resu
lts o
btai
ned
from
the
DM
. S
TP’s
pro
ject
spe
cific
con
firm
atio
n of
the
MS
M m
etho
d (u
sing
CB
SS
I ana
lysi
s) o
r the
SS
SI
anal
ysis
per
form
ed fo
r on
e m
odel
(con
sist
ing
of R
WB
, RS
W T
unne
l, an
d R
B) d
id n
ot in
clud
e an
y co
mpa
rison
of t
he tr
ansf
er fu
nctio
ns o
fth
e so
il pr
essu
re p
aram
eter
at t
he in
tera
ctio
n no
des
at th
e ex
terio
r wal
ls a
nd th
e in
tera
ctin
g ad
jace
nt b
uild
ing
wal
ls.
STP
indi
cate
d th
atpo
tent
ial i
mpa
ct o
n de
sign
of a
ny c
hang
es in
soi
l dis
tribu
tion
due
to m
etho
d of
ana
lysi
s w
ill b
e de
mon
stra
ted
by e
ngin
eerin
g ju
dgm
ent.
The
staf
f will
furth
er re
view
and
dis
cuss
this
issu
e w
ith S
TP.
6.
D
GFO
SV
SS
I ana
lysi
s is
bei
ng re
vise
d us
ing
MS
M.
Forc
es a
nd a
ccel
erat
ions
and
ISR
S w
ere
gene
rate
d. D
esig
n is
not
exp
ecte
d to
cha
nge.
Thi
s is
ac
cept
able
to th
e st
aff.
How
ever
, the
app
lican
t sho
uld
dem
onst
rate
that
the
seis
mic
inpu
t (i.e
., am
plifi
ed in
put s
pect
ra d
ue to
pre
senc
e of
the
near
by h
eavy
st
ruct
ure)
use
d fo
r SS
I ana
lysi
s of
DG
FOS
V is
not
affe
cted
whe
n M
SM
is u
sed
for t
he re
anal
ysis
(to
addr
ess
DN
FSB
issu
es) o
f the
nea
rby
heav
y st
ruct
ures
. 7.
For S
SS
I ana
lysi
s (fo
r soi
l pre
ssur
e de
term
inat
ion
cons
ider
ing
inte
ract
ion
of a
djac
ent b
uild
ing)
onl
y on
e m
odel
(con
sist
ing
of R
WB
, RS
W T
unne
l, an
d R
B) w
as e
valu
ated
usi
ng th
e D
M, S
M, a
nd M
SM
. S
TP h
as c
ompl
eted
the
anal
ysis
onl
y fo
r the
low
er b
ound
soi
l cas
e (U
B c
ase
usin
g ba
ckfil
l will
als
o be
pe
rform
ed).
Pre
limin
ary
resu
lts in
dica
te th
at a
bsol
ute
soil
pres
sure
pro
file
obta
ined
from
SM
and
MS
M in
som
e in
stan
ces
(par
ticul
arly
for e
xter
ior w
alls
) did
no
t com
pare
wel
l with
thos
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e D
M.
How
ever
, max
imum
tota
l wal
l for
ce (o
btai
ned
from
the
TH a
naly
sis)
due
to s
oil p
ress
ure
in g
ener
al is
w
ithin
5%
for a
ll th
ree
met
hods
. Bas
ed o
n th
is a
naly
sis,
STP
pre
limin
arily
con
clud
edth
at th
e so
il pr
essu
re o
btai
ned
from
SM
is a
ccep
tabl
e. F
urth
er c
larif
icat
ions
rega
rdin
g th
e en
tries
(inc
ludi
ng h
ow th
ey w
ere
com
pute
d)pr
esen
ted
in T
able
5.1
pro
vide
d by
STP
at J
uly
27 A
udit
are
need
ed. T
he p
oten
tial i
mpa
ct o
n de
sign
of a
ny c
hang
es in
soi
l pre
ssur
edi
strib
utio
n du
e to
met
hod
of a
naly
sis
will
be
addr
esse
d in
item
5 a
bove
.
Issu
e 25
: [R
ecei
ved
08/1
8/20
11; N
ew A
ctio
n Ite
m] F
ollo
w-u
p Q
uest
ion
to R
AI 0
3.07
.01-
29 -
DN
FSB
Issu
es R
elat
ed to
the
SASS
I Sub
trac
tion
Met
hod
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
25 o
f 27
Oct
ober
7, 2
011
Cla
rific
atio
ns fr
om N
RC
So
uth
Texa
s Pr
ojec
t Uni
ts 3
& 4
8.
S
TP s
houl
d re
eval
uate
Cla
rific
atio
n Is
sue
3 fo
r est
ablis
hing
sei
smic
dem
and
of II
/I an
d ap
plic
able
Cat
egor
y I s
truct
ures
in li
ght o
f DN
FSB
issu
e an
d in
itiat
e ap
prop
riate
act
ions
incl
udin
g an
y re
visi
on o
f the
am
plifi
ed in
put s
pect
ra fo
r sta
bilit
y ev
alua
tion
and
FSA
R.
9.
S
TP s
houl
d re
view
all
the
Pun
ch L
ist I
tem
s an
d an
y ap
plic
able
RA
I res
pons
es to
det
erm
ine
if an
y of
the
resp
onse
s pr
evio
usly
pro
vide
d sh
ould
be
revi
sed
as a
resu
lt of
the
asse
ssm
ent p
erfo
rmed
for a
ddre
ssin
g D
NFS
B is
sues
. 10
. T
he is
sue
of z
ero
SS
SI p
ress
ure
on p
ortio
ns o
f the
RS
WP
H N
orth
wal
l (Fi
gure
3H
.6-2
19, l
ette
r NR
C-1
1009
6) w
as fu
rther
dis
cuss
ed w
ith S
TP a
t Jul
y 27
, 201
1 m
eetin
g. I
t was
indi
cate
d th
at th
ere
is a
gap
at t
hese
loca
tions
bet
wee
n th
e R
SW
PT
sout
h w
all a
nd th
e R
SW
PH
nor
th w
all f
illed
by
the
com
pres
sibl
e m
ater
ial.
How
ever
, for
bet
ter c
larit
y an
d un
ders
tand
ing
of th
e an
alys
is m
odel
, STP
is re
ques
ted
to p
rovi
de a
n en
gine
erin
g sk
etch
sho
win
g ty
pica
l sec
tions
bet
wee
n th
e R
SW
PT
and
RS
WP
H in
clud
ing
the
tunn
el e
ntrie
s to
the
RS
WP
H.
In a
dditi
on it
was
not
ed th
at S
ectio
n 7
of F
igur
e 1
(see
sei
smic
soi
l pre
ssur
e ha
ndou
t of J
uly
27 m
eetin
g) w
as c
ut th
roug
h R
SW
PH
nor
th w
all,
inte
r spa
ce
betw
een
the
tunn
el e
ntrie
s to
the
RS
WP
H n
orth
wal
l, R
SW
tunn
el c
ross
sec
tion,
and
oth
er b
uild
ings
. H
owev
er F
igur
e 3H
.6-2
11 (s
ee le
tter N
RC
-110
042
- 2D
S
SS
I mod
el o
f RS
WP
H, R
SW
PT,
DG
FOS
Vs,
and
RB
) ind
icat
es th
at th
e ac
tual
SS
SI m
odel
sec
tion
has
been
cut
thro
ugh
the
tunn
el e
ntrie
s to
the
RS
WP
H
inst
ead
of th
e in
ter s
pace
bet
wee
n th
e tu
nnel
ent
ries
as d
epic
ted
in S
ectio
n 7.
Whi
le th
e S
SS
I mod
el a
naly
zed
appe
ars
to b
e co
nsis
tent
with
the
soil
pres
sure
sho
wn
in F
igur
e 3H
.6-2
19, t
he re
sulti
ng S
SS
I pre
ssur
e m
ay n
ot c
onse
rvat
ivel
y re
pres
ent t
he in
tera
ctio
n pr
essu
re th
at c
ould
dev
elop
on
RS
WP
H
Nor
th w
all a
nd R
SW
PT
sout
h w
all t
hrou
gh in
tera
ctio
n of
soi
l in
the
spac
e en
clos
ed b
y th
e tu
nnel
ent
ries,
RS
WP
H N
orth
wal
l, an
d R
SW
PT
sout
h w
all.
The
ap
plic
ant i
s re
ques
ted
to a
ddre
ss th
is is
sue
and
dem
onst
rate
that
SS
SI i
nter
actio
n pr
essu
re u
sed
for d
esig
n is
stil
l con
serv
ativ
e.
11.
Ten
tativ
e. F
or U
HS
/RS
WP
H, R
SW
Tun
nel (
SS
SI p
ress
ure)
, and
DG
FOS
V, n
eed
furth
er d
emon
stra
tion
of s
oil p
ress
ure
com
para
bilit
y at
the
inte
ract
ion
node
s at
the
exte
rior a
nd in
terio
r wal
l bet
wee
n D
M a
nd S
M/M
SM
for j
ustif
ying
the
basi
s of
SS
I/SS
SI s
oil p
ress
ure.
Fol
low
ing
or o
ther
opt
ions
may
be
cons
ider
ed:
1.
Com
paris
on o
f SS
I soi
l pre
ssur
e tra
nsfe
r fun
ctio
n ob
tain
ed fr
om C
B a
naly
sis
by D
M a
nd S
M/M
SM
at s
elec
ted
exte
rior w
all n
odes
as
par
t of p
roje
ct s
peci
fic c
onfir
mat
ion
(Poi
sson
’s ra
tio 0
.495
)
2.
Com
paris
on o
f soi
l pre
ssur
e tra
nsfe
r fun
ctio
ns (f
or th
e S
SS
I mod
el c
onsi
stin
g of
RW
B, R
SW
Tun
nel,
and
RB
) at r
epre
sent
ativ
e
i
nter
actio
n no
des
for b
oth
exte
rior a
nd in
terio
r wal
ls fo
r the
thre
e m
etho
ds
For t
he m
odel
dis
cuss
ed in
item
2 a
bove
, com
paris
on o
f soi
l pre
ssur
e di
strib
utio
n ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e th
ree
met
hods
at t
he c
orre
spon
ding
tim
eat
whi
ch th
e m
axim
um to
tal p
ress
ure
had
occu
rred
.
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
26 o
f 27
Oct
ober
7, 2
011
Cla
rific
atio
ns fr
om N
RC
So
uth
Texa
s Pr
ojec
t Uni
ts 3
& 4
The
NR
C h
as re
view
ed N
INA
's re
spon
se to
the
DO
E is
sue
with
resp
ect t
o se
ism
ic d
esig
n lo
ads
on th
e U
ltim
ate
Hea
t Sin
k / P
ump
Hou
se s
truct
ure.
NIN
A
dem
onst
rate
d th
at c
hang
es in
dem
and
attri
buta
ble
to th
e M
odifi
ed S
ubtra
ctio
n M
etho
d (M
SM
), as
opp
osed
to th
e or
igin
al S
ubtra
ctio
n M
etho
d (S
M) a
naly
sis,
ar
e ad
equa
tely
cov
ered
by
the
exis
ting
mar
gins
due
to c
onse
rvat
ive
appl
ied
seis
mic
load
s, a
nd h
ence
the
chan
ge to
MS
M d
oes
not a
ffect
the
desi
gn.
Her
ein,
"m
argi
ns" r
efer
s to
the
amou
nt b
y w
hich
the
appl
ied
seis
mic
des
ign
load
s, a
s ca
lcul
ated
usi
ng a
SA
P20
00 e
quiv
alen
t sta
tic m
odel
, exc
eed
thos
e sa
me
load
s as
cal
cula
ted
from
the
SS
I ana
lyse
s. .
The
NR
C h
as ra
ised
two
conc
erns
rega
rdin
g qu
antif
icat
ion
of th
e m
argi
ns:
1. T
he N
RC
is a
skin
g fo
r fur
ther
ver
ifica
tion,
bey
ond
wha
t has
bee
n de
mon
stra
ted
in th
e V
&V
pro
cess
, tha
t sec
tion
cut f
orce
s ba
sed
on e
lem
ent f
orce
s fro
m
SS
I ana
lysi
s us
ing
SA
SS
I200
0 ar
e co
rrec
t.
2. T
he N
RC
is a
lso
aski
ng fo
r fur
ther
ver
ifica
tion
that
the
so-c
alle
d co
arse
mes
h us
ed in
the
SS
I ana
lyse
s is
suf
ficie
ntly
refin
ed fo
r det
erm
inat
ion
of s
ectio
n cu
t for
ces.
Pro
pose
d R
espo
nse:
NIN
A p
ropo
ses
the
follo
win
g tw
o in
depe
nden
t ana
lyse
s to
add
ress
the
two
NR
C c
once
rns:
1. B
ench
mar
k: T
o co
nfirm
that
the
sect
ion
cut f
orce
s fro
m S
SI a
naly
sis
usin
g S
AS
SI2
000
are
calc
ulat
ed c
orre
ctly
, a d
ynam
ic a
naly
sis
perfo
rmed
in
SA
SS
I200
0 w
ill b
e re
peat
ed u
sing
SA
P20
00 w
ith a
n id
entic
al m
odel
and
inpu
t. Th
e m
odel
s w
ill b
e id
entic
al to
the
so-c
alle
d co
arse
mes
h m
odel
use
d fo
r S
SI a
naly
sis
of U
HS
/RS
W P
H, b
ut w
ill b
e ru
n as
fixe
d ba
se.
Inpu
t gro
und
mot
ions
will
be
the
site
-spe
cific
SS
E, t
he re
sults
from
the
thre
e se
ism
ic
com
pone
nts
will
be
com
bine
d us
ing
SR
SS
, and
onl
y th
e fu
ll ba
sin
case
will
be
cons
ider
ed.
Com
paris
on w
ill in
clud
e al
l sec
tion
cut f
orce
s fro
m th
e sa
me
19
loca
tions
list
ed in
Tab
les
03.0
7.01
-29
S1.
16 a
nd 0
3.07
.01-
29 S
1.17
of t
he d
raft
RA
I res
pons
e 03
.07.
01-2
9 S
1. I
f sec
tion
cut f
orce
s fro
m th
e tw
o an
alys
es
are
with
in a
ppro
xim
atel
y 10
%, t
he s
ectio
n cu
t for
ces
from
the
SS
I ana
lysi
s us
ing
SA
SS
I200
0 w
ill b
e co
nsid
ered
cor
rect
.
2. M
esh
Ref
inem
ent:
To c
onfir
m th
at th
e co
arse
mes
h m
odel
of t
he S
SI a
naly
sis
of th
e U
HS
/RS
W P
H u
sing
Mod
ified
Sub
tract
ion
Met
hod
is s
uffic
ient
ly
refin
ed fo
r det
erm
inat
ion
of s
ectio
n cu
t for
ces,
a d
ynam
ic a
naly
sis
perfo
rmed
in S
AS
SI2
000
will
be
repe
ated
usi
ng a
mes
h th
at h
as b
een
mod
ified
to b
est
appr
oxim
ate
that
use
d in
the
SA
P20
00 d
esig
n m
odel
usi
ng e
quiv
alen
t sta
tic m
etho
d. T
he m
odel
s an
d in
put m
otio
ns w
ill b
e id
entic
al e
xcep
t for
this
mes
h m
odifi
catio
n. B
oth
dyna
mic
ana
lyse
s w
ill b
e ru
n us
ing
fixed
bas
e bo
unda
ry c
ondi
tions
sub
ject
to s
ite-s
peci
fic S
SE
gro
und
mot
ions
con
side
ring
both
full
and
empt
y ba
sin
case
s. T
he re
sults
from
the
thre
e se
ism
ic c
ompo
nent
s w
ill b
e co
mbi
ned
usin
g S
RS
S.
Com
paris
on w
ill in
clud
e al
l sec
tion
cut f
orce
s fro
m th
e sa
me
19 lo
catio
ns li
sted
in T
able
s 03
.07.
01-2
9 S
1.16
and
03.
07.0
1-29
S1.
17 o
f the
dra
ft R
AI r
espo
nse
03.0
7.01
-29
S1.
If s
ectio
n cu
t for
ces
are
with
in
10%
, the
SS
I coa
rse
mes
h w
ill b
e co
nsid
ered
ade
quat
ely
refin
ed fo
r det
erm
inat
ion
of s
ectio
n cu
t for
ces
from
MS
M S
SI a
naly
sis.
For
any
sec
tion
whe
re th
e se
ctio
n cu
t for
ces
from
the
mod
ified
mes
h ar
e hi
gher
by
mor
e th
an 1
0%, t
he c
orre
spon
ding
sec
tion
cut f
orce
s fro
m th
e M
SM
SS
I ana
lysi
s w
ill b
e in
crea
sed
by th
e sa
me
% in
crea
se p
rior t
o co
mpa
rison
with
the
sect
ion
cut f
orce
s fro
m th
e S
AP
2000
des
ign
mod
el fo
r dem
onst
ratin
g ad
equa
cy o
f the
exi
stin
g de
sign
.
Issu
e 26
: [D
iscu
ssed
09/
30/2
011;
New
Act
ion
Item
] As
disc
usse
d at
the
Aud
it on
09/
30/1
1
C:\D
ocum
ents
and
Set
tings
\030
021\
Des
ktop
\NR
C 1
1092
7 A
udit\
3.7
& 3
.8 P
unch
Lis
t Pos
t Sep
tem
ber A
udit.
xls
CO
LA S
ectio
ns: 3
.7 a
nd 3
.8
P
age
27 o
f 27
SUBJECT: Proposed Approach, Calculation of Dose to Site Personnel for Classification of the RWB
RG 1.143 requires the determination of the “maximum unmitigated exposure to site personnel” in order to classify radwaste systems, structures and components. The following are the essential elements of the methodology used to calculate the exposure to site personnel for the classification of the STP 3&4 Radwaste Building (RWB).
� The “maximum unmitigated exposure to site personnel” as used in RG 1.143 is the exposure to site personnel that results from “the total design basis unmitigated release (considering the maximum inventory)”.
� The term “unmitigated release,” as used in RG 1.143, implies no reliance on the active systems in the RWB that function to mitigate radioactivity releases during abnormal operation or unusual restrictions on personnel access to reduce exposure. Therefore, only passive features in the RWB (e.g., building walls) are assumed to exist during an unmitigated release scenario.
� Since each area of the RWB is designed to retain the activity from components in the area, the activity released from a liquid containing component (e.g., a tank) will remain localized in the associated cubicle.
� The unmitigated release causes a reconfiguration of the radiation sources in each cubicle (i.e., the liquid will collect in the bottom of the cubicle). The normal features of the RWB provide shielding to reduce the direct dose rate in normally accessible areas of the RWB.
� The maximum exposure to site personnel is calculated based on dose rates resulting from the configuration of the radiation sources following the unmitigated release and the following exposure scenario:
o The maximally exposed site person is an operator that works continuously in the RWB for one year following the unmitigated release.
o The operator is assumed to spend 40 hours per week for 50 weeks in the RWB (2000 hours in one year).
12/01/11 Page 1 of 1
![FW: [Fwd: FW: Beautiful_TIBET]](https://static.fdocuments.in/doc/165x107/54b8dcf94a79592d6a8b4612/fw-fwd-fw-beautifultibet.jpg)
