2011 State Assessments Summary Results Dr. Bari Anhalt Erlichson Chief Performance Officer February...
27
2011 State Assessments Summary Results Dr. Bari Anhalt Erlichson Chief Performance Officer February 1 st , 2012
-
Upload
sydnie-buffkin -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of 2011 State Assessments Summary Results Dr. Bari Anhalt Erlichson Chief Performance Officer February...
2011 State Assessments Summary Results
Dr. Bari Anhalt ErlichsonChief Performance Officer
February 1st, 2012
Introduction
• New Jersey conducts statewide tests in grades 3 through 8 and one time in high school for Language Arts and Math.
• For Science, every student is assessed in 4th, 8th and one time in high school.
Language Arts Literacy (LAL)
New Jersey’s LAL Standards
New Jersey’s LAL Standards
Overall LAL Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
High Overall LAL Performance Over Time
HSPANJASK
% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve
Impact of Raising LAL Standards
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
Grades 5-8 LAL Performance
LAL Grade 5 LAL Grade 6 LAL Grade 7
LAL Grade 8% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
0
20
40
60
80
100
Grade 3 and 4 LAL Performance
LAL Grade 3
LAL Grade 4
% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve
LAL Proficiency By Grade
Grade2010
Proficiency 2011
Proficiency Difference3 59.7 63 3.34 59.6 62.7 3.1
5 63.1 60.9 -2.26 65.3 66.7 1.47 69.2 63.3 -5.98 82.4 82.2 -0.2
NJASK LAL Trends
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
LAL Proficiency: State vs. ESEA Flexibility Waiver - Priority Schools
State Proficient
Priority Proficient
State Advanced
Priority Advanced
% o
f Stu
dent
s
5
28
33
9
NJASK LAL Gaps
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
NJASK LAL Proficiency Gap Between Econom-ically Disadvantaged and Non-Economically
Disadvantaged Students
Non-FRPLFRPL
% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve
3126
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
NJASK LAL Proficiency Gap Between White, Hispanic, and African-American Students
White Hispanic African-American% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve
27
24
28 33
HSPA Gaps
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
HSPA LAL Proficiency Gap Between Econom-ically Disadvantaged and Non-Economically
Disadvantaged Students
Non-FRPLFRPL
% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve
13
24
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
HSPA LAL Proficiency Gap Between White, Hispanic, and African-American Students
White Hispanic African-American% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve
1625
12
Spotlight on Third Grade Reading Proficiency
• In 2010-2011, over 37,500 3rd grade students in New Jersey did not pass NJASK – LAL.
• 42% of these students were educated in DFG A or B districts.
• About 16% were educated in our five largest urban districts.
• And 43% of them were educated in schools that had a poverty rate lower than the state school average.
3rd Grade Reading Proficiency
A
B
CD
State
DE
FG
GH
I
J
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent of 3rd Graders Reading on Grade Level, By District Factor Group
% Proficient and Above, 2010-2011 NJASK LAL Grade 3
3rd Grade Reading Proficiency
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
Percent of 3rd Graders Reading on Grade Level, By DFG
DFG J State DFG A
% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve, N
JASK
Gra
de 3
22
44
3219
Mathematics
New Jersey’s Math Standards
New Jersey’s Math Standards
Overall Math Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
High Overall Math Performance Over Time
HSPANJASK
% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve
Impact of Raising Math Standards
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
Grades 5-8 Math Performance
Math Grade 5 Math Grade 6 Math Grade 7
Math Grade 8%
Pro
ficie
nt a
nd A
bove
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
Grade 3 and 4 Math Performance
Math Grade 3
Math Grade 4
% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve
Math Proficiency By Grade
Grade2010
Proficiency 2011
Proficiency Difference3 78.1 78.9 0.84 77 79.3 2.35 78.7 80.6 1.96 71.8 77.3 5.57 64.3 65.7 1.48 68.5 71.5 3.0
NJASK Math Trends
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
Math Proficiency: State vs. ESEA Flexibility Waiver - Priority Schools
Priority Proficient
State Proficient
Priority Advanced
State Advanced
% o
f Stu
dent
s
17
19
17
28
NJASK Math Gaps
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
Math Proficiency Gap Between Economically Disadvantaged and Non-Economically Dis-
advantaged Students
Non-FRPLFRPL%
Pro
ficie
nt a
nd A
bove
2425
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
NJ ASK Math Proficiency Gap Between White, Hispanic, and African-American Students
White Hispanic African-American
% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve 20
3122
32
HSPA Math Gaps
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
HSPA Math Proficiency Gap Between Economi-cally Disadvantaged and Non-Economically
Disadvantaged Students
Non-FRPLFRPL
% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve
20
28
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
HSPA Math Proficiency Gap Between White, Hispanic, and African-American Students
White Hispanic African-American% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve 29
19
28
39
Science
Overall Science Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
Overall Science Performance Over Time
NJASK Biology ECT
% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve
Science Proficiency By Grade
Grade2010
Proficiency 2011
Proficiency Difference
4 93.4 90 -3.4
8 83 81.2 -1.8
NJASK Science Gaps
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
NJASK Science Proficiency Gap Between White, Hispanic, and African-American Students
White
Hispanic
African-American
% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve
2833
23
17
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
NJASK Science Proficiency Gap Between Economically Disadvantaged and Non-Eco-
nomically Disadvantaged Students
Non-FRPLFRPL
% P
rofic
ient
and
Abo
ve 29
19
