2011 Board of Education Workshop PHYSICAL PLANT … · Maint SSFF Prop S Prop Mgmt Dev Fees CCDC...
Transcript of 2011 Board of Education Workshop PHYSICAL PLANT … · Maint SSFF Prop S Prop Mgmt Dev Fees CCDC...
6/7/2011
1
PHYSICAL PLANT OPERATIONS
2011 Board of Education Workshop
1
Proposition-SICOC committee
June 16, 2011, Exhibit 5.3
AGENDA� Physical Plant Operations Overview
� Supporting the Educational Environment� Maintenance Work Definitions
� Focus: Maintenance Plans� Maintenance Requirement vs. Available Funding� District Facility Condition� Cost: Independent Citizens Oversight Committee Review
� Focus: Funding� Types of Funding vs. Operations� Current Challenges and Proposed Approach� Maintenance Plan Vetted with Independent Citizens
Oversight Committee� Discussion
2
June 16, 2011
Prop. S ICOC July 21, 2011, Exhibit 3.4
6/7/2011
2
“Researchers have repeatedly found a difference of 5-17 percentile points between achievement of students in poor buildings and students in above-standard buildings, when the socioeconomic status of students is controlled.”
– Glen I. Earthman, “School Facilities Conditions and Student Academic Achievement.” Report prepared for Williams v. State of California, UCLA 2002, pp. 8-9
3
FACILITIES CONTRIBUTION TO EDUCATION
June 16, 2011
MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND REPAIR STAFF 10/11
� 14.8 Million Square Feet of Buildings
� 2,600 Acres of District Property
� $38 Million for Staff and Repair Supplies
4
June 16, 2011
6/7/2011
3
GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
� 2,600 Developed Acres� 21 Million Square Feet
of Asphalt
Seal Coat Asphalt Overlay
Dig and Replace Trip Hazards
Storm Drains Fencing
Line Stripe Sidewalks
Grading Irrigation Systems
5
June 16, 2011
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
� 1509 Permanent Buildings, 12,425,428 Square FeetAverage Age 39 Years
� 1926 Portable Buildings, 1,881,731 Square FeetAverage Age 48 Years
Paint Audio Visual Systems
Heating and Cooling Lighting & Power
Fire and Intrusion Alarms Plumbing Systems
Doors and Locks Roofing
Time & Signal systems Pest Control
6
June 16, 2011
6/7/2011
4
MAINTENANCE PLANNING
� Maintenance Planning� Support 285 Tradesmen� Coordinate with FPC/Prop S � Maintenance Contracts
Planning Major Repair and Replacement Plan
Estimating Repair and Replacement Plan
Inspection Priority Projects
Work Reception Capital Improvement
Work Coordination/Scheduling Preventive Maintenance Planning
Williams/SARC Inspection Facility Condition Assessment
7
June 16, 2011
CAPITAL WORK
8
TERMS
Capital Improvements (CI):
Major Repair & Replacement (MRR):
DEFINITIONS
Programmatic upgrades to meet educational needs, district programs and curriculum, and significantchange of systems technology (i.e., replacement ofheating units with package air conditioning systems, andassociated new energy efficient windows and buildinginsulation, etc.).
Replacements and upgrades of systems, such as new roofsystem, building enclosures, etc. Often considered a partof modernization or renovation of a building, generallywith a life expectancy of 20 or more years.
June 16, 2011
6/7/2011
5
MAINTENANCE WORK
9
TERMS
Repair & Replacement (RR):
Regular Maintenance (RM):
Preventive Maintenance (PM):
DEFINITIONS
Repair and/or replacement of items generally with a life expectancy of less than 20 years.
Minor repairs, as reported from sites, resulting fromnormal wear and tear on buildings such as toilets, locks,light switches, etc.
Maintenance such as inspections and lubrications of systems designed to prevent deterioration into disrepair.
June 16, 2011
SCHOOL FACILITY METRICS
� Comparative Industry Funding Metrics
� 2% – 4% of Current Replacement Value (CRV)� SDUSD CRV $4.9B: $98M to $196M Annually
� Portolan Metrics� $4 – $5 Per Square Foot: $59.2M to $74M� $400 – $500 per Student: $54.1M to $67.6M
� State of California� 3% of General Fund allocated to Routine Restricted
Maintenance Account: $34M � Currently not required until 2015
10
June 16, 2011
6/7/2011
6
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
� Leverage extensive Williams/SARC inspections to assess facilities annually�General review focused on service life, maint. history
� Incorporate AECOM FCA’s into PPO’s CMMS�Detailed review focused on bond term
� Leveraging trade activity with state of the art tools for assessing less obvious deficiencies�Remote cameras� Infrared technology for roofs, electrical, HVAC
Note: The above actions shift calculated deficiency values to literal values
11
June 16, 2011
DISTRICT FACILITY CONDITION� To calculate the Facility Condition there is a
industry standard of a ratio of total cost of repairs needed, divided by the current replacement value (CRV) of the district.
� Here is the current district calculation:
Needed Repairs: $750MCRV: $4.9B
= 15.3%
Good Fair Poor
0% 5% 10%
4/1/2011
2018 GoalEstablished 2008
12
June 16, 2011
6/7/2011
7
DISTRICT FACILITY CONDITION: CURRENT
13
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
18.00%20
08
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Facility Condition Index
2008 Plan Actual FCI Projected
Increase in CRV
$136,682,632 Difference
Go
od
Fai
r P
oo
r
June 16, 2011
By delaying Prop S contribution, it costs more to achieve our FCI goal
MAINTENANCE WORK TYPES:APPROPRIATE FUNDING FOR WORK
Capital Funds for Capital Projects:
Capital Improvements (CI):Major Repair & Replacement (MRR): Repair & Replacement (RR):
Deferred Maintenance FundProposition S Bond FundRedevelopment FundState School Facilities FundDeveloper Fee FundProperty Management Fund
Routine Restricted Maintenance Account:
Regular Maintenance (RM): Preventive Maintenance (PM):Repair & Replacement (RR):
General Fund
14
June 16, 2011
6/7/2011
8
THE CHALLENGE: FUNDING� Insufficient Funding for Regular & Preventive
Maintenance in General Fund� Long Term Funding of PPO
� Budget Flexibility Ends 2015� Resume 3% General Fund Contribution to Routine Restricted
Maintenance Account (RRMA) � Approximately $34M� State School Facilities Fund Depleted
� Prop S $50M Annual Contribution to MRR Has Been Delayed until FY 13/14� Yet buildings will not slow down deterioration and original
FCI goal less likely to be obtained� In FY 13/14 SSFF Funds Depleted� Other One-time Funds Also Depleted
15
June 16, 2011
2008 MAINTENANCE PLAN VS. FY2011 EXECUTION
16
14%
16%
21%
42%
7%
FY2011 Execution (38.0M)
June 16, 2011
2008 Plan FY11 Execution
Capital Improvements 14.3 5.5
Major Repair & Replacement 35.8 6.0
Repair & Replacement 19.0 8.0
Routine Maintenance 14.1 16.0
Preventative Maintenance 8.0 2.5
91.2 38.0
Work Category
16% Capital
Improvements
39% Major Repair
& Replacement21% Repair &
Replacement
15% Routine
Maintenance
9% Preventative
Maintenance
2008 Plan (91.2M)
6/7/2011
9
PPO BUDGET & EXPENSE TRANSFER PLANFISCAL YEAR 2011/12
$0
$5
$10$15
$20
$25
$30$35
$40
$45
$50
As Budgeted As Funded
GF Restr Maint $12M
SSFF $25M
Prop S $3M
Prop Mgmt $3M
Dev Fees $2M
CCDC $1.4M
Othr Misc $1.2M
17
General Fund
Work Order Expense Transfer
General Fund
State School Facilities Fund
Prop S
Property MgmtDeveloper Fees
Total - $47.6 Million
June 16, 2011
PPO MAINTENANCE EXPENDITURE HISTORY
18
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Restricted Maint GFSecure our SchoolLiability InsuranceMesa College ConstrRedevelopment AgencyAdult EdState PreschoolCopley FundChild DevelopmentProp ManagementProp InsuranceCafeteria FundProp SProp MMDeveloper FeesDeferred MaintenanceState School Facil Fund
June 16, 2011
6/7/2011
10
PPO BUDGET PROJECTIONSFISCAL YEARS 2012 - 2014
19
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
$45
$50
2011/12 2012/13 2013/14
GF Restr Maint
SSFF
Prop S
Prop Mgmt
Dev Fees
CCDC
Othr Misc
June 16, 2011
20
STATE SCHOOL FACILITIES FUND
2.821.4
27
28.9
26.4
10 12.75
2025 32.25
00
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15
MRR/RR Reserve
SSFF Fund W/O Reserve
PPO Expenditures
Non-PPO Expenditures
June 16, 2011
6/7/2011
11
21
STATE SCHOOL FACILITIES FUND
�MRR/RR Funding Plan is Budgeted for 25M Annually FY10 through FY13�MRR/RR Work Plan will allow extension of these funds until FY14 �Work originally planned (needed) in FY10 through FY13 will be completed in FY14
25
0
10
12.75
20
25
32.25
00
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15
PPO MRR/RR Funding Plan as Budgeted
PPO MRR/RR Work Forecast as Planned
June 16, 2011
FACILITIES CONTRIBUTION TO EDUCATION
“Researchers have repeatedly found a difference of 5-17 percentile points between achievement of students in poor buildings and students in above-standard buildings, when the socioeconomic status of students is controlled.”
– Glen I. Earthman, “School Facilities Conditions and Student Academic Achievement.” Report prepared for Williams v. State of California, UCLA 2002, pp. 8-9
22
June 16, 2011
6/7/2011
12
RECOMMENDATIONS:
� Approve the SSFF MRR reserve fund� Support the 2011/2012 Maintenance Budget
as presented� Support 2015 Maintenance Funding at 3% of
the General Fund for the Routine Restricted Maintenance Account, $34M
� Fund Annual Maintenance Plan per 2008 recommendations, $91.2M
23
June 16, 2011