2011 attendance project
47
90.0% 91.0% 92.0% 93.0% 94.0% 95.0% 96.0% 97.0% 98.0% 96.2% 96.1% 95.9% 95.2% 95.1% 95.1% 95.1% 95.1% 95.0% 95.0% 94.9% 94.9% 94.8% 94.8% 94.7% 94.7% 94.7% 94.5% 94.5% 94.5% 94.5% 95.0% 94.4% 94.2% 94.0% 94.0% 94.0% 93.8% 93.6% 93.6% 93.5% 93.4% 93.4% 93.3% 91.9% Akron Public Schools Ranked ADA From 2010-2011 Report Card Pyramid of Intervention 94.0%-100% Universal 93.0%-93.9% Targeted (In Yellow) Below 93% Intensive
-
Upload
akron-public-schools -
Category
Technology
-
view
280 -
download
2
Transcript of 2011 attendance project
Resni
kKin
g
Essex
Betty
Jan
e
Bette
sCas
e
Helen
Arn
old
Schum
ache
r
Voris
Win
dem
ere
Hatto
n
Porta
ge P
ath
Crous
e
Pfeiff
er
Fire
ston
e Par
k
Ranki
n
Ritzm
an
Glove
r
Harris
Rimer
Seibe
rling
DISTR
ICT
Elem
(K-5
)
Barbe
r
David
Hill
Find
ley
Fore
st H
ill
DISTR
ICT
(K-1
2)
Legg
ett
Mas
on
Smith
McE
brig
ht
Robin
son
Sam S
alem
Lawnd
ale
Barre
tt90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
96.2
%96
.1%
95.9
%
95.2
%
95.1
%
95.1
%95
.1%
95.1
%
95.0
%
95.0
%
94.9
%94
.9%
94.8
%
94.8
%94
.7%
94.7
%
94.7
%
94.5
%
94.5
%
94.5
%
94.5
% 95.0
%
94.4
%
94.2
%94
.0%
94.0
%
94.0
%
93.8
%
93.6
%
93.6
%
93.5
%
93.4
%
93.4
%93
.3%
91.9
%
Akron Public SchoolsRanked ADA From 2010-2011 Report Card
Pyramid of Intervention
94.0%-100% Universal 93.0%-93.9% Targeted (In Yellow) Below 93% Intensive
Resni
k
Essex
King
Bette
s
Helen
Arn
old
Voris
Betty
Jan
e
Hatto
n
Win
dem
ere
Schum
ache
r
Case
Fire
ston
e Par
k
Glove
r
Ritzm
an
Pfeiff
er
Porta
ge P
ath
Crous
e
Ranki
n
Barbe
r
DISTR
ICT
ELEM
Rimer
Fore
st H
ill
Harris
Find
ley
Seibe
rling
DISTR
ICT
(K-1
2)Hill
Lawnd
ale
Smith
Legg
ett
Sam S
alem
Mas
on
Robin
son
McE
brig
ht
Bridge
s
Barre
tt 90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
96.2
%95
.9%
95.9
%
95.2
%
95.1
%
95.0
%94
.9%
94.9
%
94.9
%
94.8
%
94.7
%94
.7%
94.7
%
94.7
%94
.6%
94.6
%
94.4
%
94.4
%
94.3
%
94.3
%
94.2
%
94.0
%
94.0
%
93.9
%93
.8%
93.7
%
93.7
%
93.6
%
93.6
%
93.5
%
93.5
%93
.4%
93.1
%92
.3%
92.0
%
91.4
%
Akron Public SchoolsRanked ADA From September 1, 2010 Through April 29, 2011
Pyramid of Intervention
94.0%-100% Universal 93.0%-93.9% Targeted (In Yellow) Below 93% Intensive
Resni
k
King
Essex
Bette
s
Helen
Arn
old
Hatto
n
Voris
Betty
Jan
e
Ritzm
an
Win
dem
ere
Schum
ache
r
Case
Fire
ston
e Par
k
Glove
r
Pfeiff
er
Porta
ge P
ath
Ranki
n
Barbe
r
Crous
e
DISTR
ICT
ELEM
Rimer
Fore
st H
ill
Harris
Find
ley
Lawnd
ale
Hill
Seibe
rling
Smith
DISTR
ICT
(K-1
2)
Legg
ett
Sam S
alem
Mas
on
Robin
son
McE
brig
ht
Bridge
s
Barre
tt 90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
96.2
%96
.0%
95.9
%
95.3
%
95.2
%
95.0
%95
.0%
94.9
%
94.9
%
94.9
%
94.8
%94
.7%
94.7
%
94.7
%94
.7%
94.6
%
94.6
%
94.3
%
94.3
%
94.3
%
94.2
%
94.0
%
94.0
%
93.9
%93
.8%
93.7
%
93.7
%
93.7
%
93.7
%
93.5
%
93.5
%93
.4%
93.1
%92
.3%
92.2
%
91.4
%
Akron Public SchoolsRanked ADA From September 1, 2010 Through March 31, 2011
Pyramid of Intervention
94.0%-100% Universal 93.0%-93.9% Targeted (In Yellow) Below 93% Intensive
King
Resni
k
Essex
Bette
s
Helen
Arn
old
Voris
Pfeiff
er
Win
dem
ere
Betty
Jan
e
Hatto
n
Fire
ston
e Par
k
Ranki
n
Glove
r
Porta
ge P
ath
Ritzm
an
Case
Barbe
r
Schum
ache
r
Distri
ct (E
LEM
)
Crous
e
Fore
st H
ill
Rimer
Harris
Smith
Hill
Legg
ett
Find
ley
Distri
ct (K
-12)
Sam S
alem
Lawnd
ale
Seibe
rling
Mas
on
Robin
son
Bridge
s
Barre
tt
McE
brig
ht
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
96.3
%96
.2%
96.0
%
95.4
%
95.3
%
95.2
%95
.1%
95.0
%
95.0
%
95.0
%
95.0
%95
.0%
94.9
%
94.9
%94
.8%
94.8
%
94.8
%
94.6
%
94.3
%
94.2
%
94.2
%
94.2
%
94.0
%
94.0
%93
.9%
93.9
%
93.8
%
93.8
%
93.7
%
93.6
%
93.6
%93
.6%
93.4
%92
.2%
91.9
%
91.6
%
Akron Public SchoolsRanked ADA From September 1, 2010 Through February 28, 2011
Pyramid of Intervention
94.0%-100% Universal 93.0%-93.9% Targeted (In Yellow) Below 93% Intensive
King
Resni
k
Essex
Bette
s
Helen
Arn
old
Voris
Pfeiff
er
Win
dem
ere
Betty
Jan
e
Hatto
n
Fire
ston
e Par
k
Ranki
n
Glove
r
Porta
ge P
ath
Ritzm
an
Case
Barbe
r
Schum
ache
r
Distri
ct (E
LEM
)
Crous
e
Fore
st H
ill
Rimer
Harris
Smith
Hill
Legg
ett
Find
ley
Distri
ct (K
-12)
Sam S
alem
Lawnd
ale
Seibe
rling
Mas
on
Robin
son
Bridge
s
Barre
tt
McE
brig
ht
0.9
1.0
96.3
%96
.2%
96.0
%
95.4
%
95.3
%
95.2
%95
.1%
95.0
%
95.0
%
95.0
%
95.0
%95
.0%
94.9
%
94.9
%94
.8%
94.8
%
94.8
%
94.6
%
94.3
%
94.2
%
94.2
%
94.2
%
94.0
%
94.0
%93
.9%
93.9
%
93.8
%
93.8
%
93.7
%
93.6
%
93.6
%93
.6%
93.4
%92
.2%
91.9
%
91.6
%
Akron Public SchoolsRanked ADA From September 1, 2010 Through January 31, 2011
Pyramid of Intervention
94.0%-100% Universal 93.0%-93.9% Targeted (In Yellow) Below 93% Intensive
Resni
k
King
Essex
Bette
s
Helen
Arn
old
Betty
Jan
e
Voris
Win
dem
ere
Hatto
n
Pfeiff
er
Fire
ston
e Par
k
Ranki
n
Glove
r
Case
Porta
ge P
ath
Ritzm
an
Barbe
r
Schum
ache
r
Fore
st H
ill
Distri
ct E
LEM
Crous
e
Rimer
Harris
Hill
Legg
ett
Smith
Sam S
alem
Distri
ct (K
-12)
Lawnd
ale
Find
ley
Mas
on
Seibe
rling
Robin
son
Barre
tt
Bridge
s
McE
brig
ht
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
96.5
%96
.4%
96.2
%
95.7
%
95.6
%
95.5
%95
.5%
95.5
%
95.4
%
95.4
%
95.3
%95
.3%
95.2
%
95.1
%95
.1%
95.1
%
95.0
%
94.9
%
94.7
%
94.7
%
94.6
%
94.6
%
94.4
%
94.3
%94
.3%
94.3
%
94.1
%
94.1
%
94.0
%
93.9
%93
.9%
93.8
%
93.7
%92
.3%
92.3
%
92.1
%
Akron Public SchoolsRanked ADA From September 1, 2010 Through January 20, 2011
Pyramid of Intervention
94.0%-100% Universal 93.0%-93.9% Targeted (In Yellow) Below 93% Intensive
King
Resnik
Essex
Betty
Jan
e
Bette
s
Win
demer
e
Helen
Arn
old
Pfeiff
er
Voris
Hatto
n
Ranki
n
Firest
one Par
k
Glove
r
Ritzm
an
Portage
Path
Barber
Case
Schum
acher
Forest
Hill
Rimer
DISTRIC
T ELEM
Crouse
Harris
Legget
t
David
Hill
Lawndal
e
Sam S
alem
Smith
Findle
y
Mas
on
DISTRIC
T K-1
2
Robinso
n
Seiber
ling
Barre
tt
McE
bright
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
96.7
%96
.6%
96.3
%96
.2%
96.0
%95
.9%
95.8
%95
.8%
95.8
%95
.7%
95.6
%95
.5%
95.4
%95
.4%
95.3
%95
.2%
95.2
%95
.2%
95.1
%95
.1%
95.1
%94
.9%
94.9
%94
.7%
94.6
%94
.6%
94.6
%94
.5%
94.4
%94
.4%
94.3
%94
.2%
94.1
%92
.9%
92.4
%
Akron Public SchoolsRanked ADA From September 1, 2010 Through December 17, 2010
Pyramid of Intervention 94.0%-100% Universal 93.0%-93.9% Targeted (In Yellow)
Below 93% Intensive
Resnik
King
Essex
Betty
Jan
e
Helen
Arn
old
Bette
s
Pfeiff
er
Ranki
nVoris
Firest
one Par
k
Glove
r
Hatto
n
Ritzm
an
Portage
Path
Barber
Forest
Hill
Schum
acher
Case
Harris
Rimer
Crouse
Legget
t
Smith
Findle
y
Win
demer
e
David
Hill
Lawndal
e
Mas
on
Sam S
alem
Robinso
n
DISTRIC
T
Seiber
ling
Barre
tt
McE
bright
Bridges
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
96.9
%96
.8%
96.5
%96
.4%
96.4
%96
.2%
96.2
%96
.1%
96.0
%95
.9%
95.9
%95
.9%
95.8
%95
.7%
95.6
%95
.5%
95.5
%95
.4%
95.4
%95
.4%
95.3
%95
.2%
95.2
%95
.1%
95.1
%94
.9%
94.9
%94
.9%
94.9
%94
.7%
94.6
%94
.6%
93.6
%92
.9%
92.8
%
Akron Public SchoolsRanked ADA From September 1, 2010 Through November 30, 2010
Pyramid of Intervention 94.0%-100% Universal 93.0%-93.9% Targeted (In Yellow)
Below 93% Intensive
King
Resnik
Essex
Pfeiff
er
Voris
Bette
s
Betty
Jan
e
Helen
Arn
old
Hatto
n
Ranki
n
Firest
one Par
k
Glove
r
Ritzm
an
Legget
t
Win
demer
e
Crouse
Portage
Path
Rimer
Smith
Barber
Case
Forest
Hill
Harris
Schum
acher
Findle
y
Lawndal
e
Sam S
alem
Robinso
n
DISTRIC
T
Mas
on
David
Hill
Seiber
ling
Barre
tt
Bridges
McE
bright
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
97.2
%97
.2%
96.9
%96
.9%
96.9
%96
.8%
96.7
%96
.5%
96.4
%96
.4%
96.2
%96
.2%
96.2
%96
.0%
96.0
%95
.9%
95.9
%95
.9%
95.9
%95
.8%
95.8
%95
.8%
95.8
%95
.8%
95.6
%95
.6%
95.4
%95
.2%
95.1
%95
.1%
95.0
%94
.9%
93.8
%92
.6%
92.4
%
Akron Public SchoolsRanked ADA From September 1, 2010 Through October 29, 2010
Pyramid of Intervention 94.0%-100% Universal 93.0%-93.9% Targeted (In Yellow)
Below 93% Intensive
Lawndale Pfeiffer Rimer Sam Salem Smith DISTRICT (K-12)
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
94.4%94.5% 94.8% 94.7%
94.3%
93.2%93.8%
94.1%
94.9%
94.2%93.8%
93.1%
93.3%
94.8%94.5%
93.4% 93.6%
94.0%
Akron Public SchoolsComparison of Attendance 2008-2009 Report Card vs. 2009-2010 Report Card vs.
2010-2011 Report CardKenmore Cluster
08-09 ADA on LRC 09-10 ADA On LRC 10-11 ADA On LRC
Barrett Firestone Park Glover McEbright Voris DISTRICT (K-12)
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
92.8%
95.3% 95.2%
94.6%
95.6%
93.2%93.1%
94.1%
94.6%
94.4%
95.3%
93.1%
91.9%
94.7%94.5%
93.5%
95.0%
94.0%
Akron Public SchoolsComparison of Attendance 2008-2009 Report Card vs. 2009-2010 Report Card vs.
2010-2011 Report CardGarfield Cluster
08-09 ADA on LRC 09-10 ADA On LRC 10-11 ADA On LRC
Betty Jane Hatton Ritzman Windemere DISTRICT (K-12)90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
95.3%
94.9%
94.1%
95.2%
93.2%
95.1%
94.5% 94.6%
95.2%
93.1%
95.2%94.9% 94.7%
95.0%
94.0%
Akron Public SchoolsComparison of Attendance 2008-2009 Report Card vs. 2009-2010 Report Card vs.
2010-2011 Report CardEllet Cluster
08-09 ADA on LRC 09-10 ADA On LRC 10-11 ADA On LRC
Barber David Hill Mason Robinson Seiberling DISTRICT (K-12)
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
94.5% 94.6%94.3% 94.3%
93.9%
93.2%
94.3% 93.9% 93.8%93.4% 93.7%
93.1%
94.3%94.2%
93.6% 93.4%
94.5%
94.0%
Akron Public SchoolsComparison of Attendance 2008-2009 Report Card vs. 2009-2010 Report Card vs.
2010-2011 Report CardEast Cluster
08-09 ADA on LRC 09-10 ADA On LRC 10-11 ADA On LRC
Bettes Findley Forest Hill Harris Leggett DISTRICT (K-12)90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
95.5%
94.8%95.0%
94.5% 94.6%
93.2%
95.2%
94.6% 94.4%94.5%
94.3%
93.1%
95.1%
94.0% 94.0%94.5%
93.8%94.0%
Akron Public SchoolsComparison of Attendance 2008-2009 Report Card vs. 2009-2010 Report Card vs.
2010-2011 Report CardNorth Cluster
08-09 ADA on LRC 09-10 ADA On LRC 10-11 ADA On LRC
Helen Arnold Crouse Portage Path Rankin Schumacher DISTRICT (K-12)
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
95.1%
95.9%
95.4%
94.5%
95.2%
93.2%
95.1% 95.1%
94.4%
94.8%
93.5%
93.1%
95.1%94.8%
94.9%
94.7%
94.8%
94.0%
Akron Public SchoolsComparison of Attendance
2008-2009 Report Card vs. 2009-2010 Report Card vs.
2010-2011 Report CardBuchtel Cluster
08-09 ADA on LRC 09-10 ADA On LRC 10-11 ADA On LRC
Buchtel Cluster
08-09 ADA on LR09-10 ADA O 10-11 ADA On LRCHelen Arnold 95.1% 95.1% 95.1%Crouse 95.9% 95.1% 94.8%Portage Path 95.4% 94.4% 94.9%Rankin 94.5% 94.8% 94.7%Schumacher 95.2% 93.5% 94.8%DISTRICT (K-12) 93.2% 93.1% 94.0%
East Cluster
08-09 ADA on LR09-10 ADA O 10-11 ADA On LRCBarber 94.5% 94.3% 94.3%David Hill 94.6% 93.9% 94.2%Mason 94.3% 93.8% 93.6%Robinson 94.3% 93.4% 93.4%Seiberling 93.9% 93.7% 94.5%DISTRICT (K-12) 93.2% 93.1% 94.0%
North Cluster
08-09 ADA on LR09-10 ADA O 10-11 ADA On LRCBettes 95.5% 95.2% 95.1%Findley 94.8% 94.6% 94.0%Forest Hill 95.0% 94.4% 94.0%Harris 94.5% 94.5% 94.5%Leggett 94.6% 94.3% 93.8%DISTRICT (K-12) 93.2% 93.1% 94.0%
Ellet Cluster
08-09 ADA on LR09-10 ADA O 10-11 ADA On LRCBetty Jane 95.3% 95.1% 95.2%Hatton 94.9% 94.5% 94.9%Ritzman 94.1% 94.6% 94.7%Windemere 95.2% 95.2% 95.0%DISTRICT (K-12) 93.2% 93.1% 94.0%
Firestone Cluster
08-09 ADA on LR09-10 ADA O 10-11 ADA On LRC
Case 95.6% 94.6% 95.1%Essex 96.1% 95.9% 95.9%King 96.2% 95.8% 96.1%Resnik 96.1% 95.8% 96.2%DISTRICT (K-12) 93.2% 93.1% 94.0%
Garfield Cluster
08-09 ADA on LR09-10 ADA O 10-11 ADA On LRCBarrett 92.8% 93.1% 91.9%Firestone Park 95.3% 94.1% 94.7%Glover 95.2% 94.6% 94.5%McEbright 94.6% 94.4% 93.5%Voris 95.6% 95.3% 95.0%DISTRICT (K-12) 93.2% 93.1% 94.0%
Kenmore Cluster
08-09 ADA on LR09-10 ADA O 10-11 ADA On LRCLawndale 94.4% 93.8% 93.3%Pfeiffer 94.5% 94.1% 94.8%Rimer 94.8% 94.9% 94.5%Sam Salem 94.7% 94.2% 93.4%Smith 94.3% 93.8% 93.6%DISTRICT (K-12) 93.2% 93.1% 94.0%
09-10 BUILDING Total Year To Date ADA Through Se ABarber 96.1% 10-11 ADA on LRCBarrett 94.2% Resnik 96.2%Bettes 96.9% King 96.1%Betty Jane 97.0% Essex 95.9%Case 96.2% Betty Jane 95.2%Crouse 95.7% Bettes 95.1%David Hill 94.9% Case 95.1%DISTRICT 95.3% Helen Arnold 95.1%Essex 97.2% Schumacher 95.1%Findley 95.4% Voris 95.0%Firestone Park 96.2% Windemere 95.0%Forest Hill 95.9% Hatton 94.9%Glover 96.6% Portage Path 94.9%Harris 96.1% Crouse 94.8%Hatton 96.3% Pfeiffer 94.8%Helen Arnold 96.6% Firestone Park 94.7%King 97.4% Rankin 94.7%Lawndale 96.1% Ritzman 94.7%Leggett 96.8% Glover 94.5%Mason 95.2% Harris 94.5%McEbright 92.9% Rimer 94.5%Pfeiffer 97.4% Seiberling 94.5%Portage Path 96.8% DISTRICT Elem (K-5) 95.0%Rankin 96.5% Barber 94.4%Resnik 97.4% David Hill 94.2%Rimer 95.7% Findley 94.0%Ritzman 97.0% Forest Hill 94.0%Robinson 95.2% DISTRICT (K-12) 94.0%Sam Salem 96.1% Leggett 93.8%Schumacher 96.6% Mason 93.6%Seiberling 94.7% Smith 93.6%Smith 97.2% McEbright 93.5%Voris 96.8% Robinson 93.4%Windemere 96.4% Sam Salem 93.4%
Lawndale 93.3%Barrett 91.9%
2008-2009
2007-2008 2007-2008 Incidents 2008-2009Incidents Days 13500.0% Days
Barber 108 197 27500.0% 20800.0%Barrett 361 744 6400.0% 73300.0%Bettes 71 96 4400.0% 7700.0%Betty Jane 76 110 12800.0% 7200.0%Case 224 367 23300.0% 22800.0%Crouse 232 378 7700.0% 34700.0%Essex 79 129 25000.0% 14100.0%Findley 305 423 7700.0% 37000.0%Firestone Park 70 159 5000.0% 12300.0%Forest Hill 69 118 20400.0% 8500.0%Glover 198 599 15000.0% 47100.0%Harris 129 238 4100.0% 34200.0%Hatton 33 46 17800.0% 8400.0%Helen Arnold 204 459 19300.0% 36500.0%Hill 243 564 1000.0% 43600.0%King 20 34 3500.0% 1200.0%Lawndale 67 97 700.0% 8000.0%Leggett 6 11 32400.0% 1300.0%Mason 201 339 15000.0% 55500.0%McEbright 112 151 5700.0% 25600.0%Pfeiffer 84 136 15900.0% 7500.0%Portage Path 245 446 22900.0% 27000.0%Rankin 232 446 4800.0% 47100.0%Resnik 45 65 8000.0% 8200.0%Rimer 18 27 6500.0% 10300.0%Ritzman 43 71 28700.0% 15600.0%Robinson 254 404 6000.0% 42200.0%Sam Salem 57 116 8400.0% 13100.0%Schumacher 66 113 22300.0% 15500.0%Seiberling 236 496 6900.0% 33400.0%Smith 56 82 1900.0% 10400.0%Voris 52 80 1600.0% 2500.0%Windemere 43 101 12184.8% 2800.0%District Average 128 238 22284.8%
2009-20102007-2008 2008-2009 IncidentsIncidents Incidents 9500.0%
Barber 108 135 10000.0%Barrett 361 275 4500.0%Bettes 71 64 4700.0%Betty Jane 76 44 19900.0%Case 224 128 21500.0%Crouse 232 233 7700.0%Essex 79 77 15200.0%Findley 305 250 7800.0%Firestone Park 70 77 2800.0%Forest Hill 69 50 18900.0%Glover 198 204 16400.0%Harris 129 150 2100.0%Hatton 33 41 16000.0%Helen Arnold 204 178 20200.0%Hill 243 193 1200.0%King 20 10 3900.0%Lawndale 67 35 2000.0%Leggett 6 7 26400.0%Mason 201 324 23500.0%McEbright 112 150 5100.0%Pfeiffer 84 57 17600.0%Portage Path 245 159 17600.0%Rankin 232 229 4300.0%Resnik 45 48 4800.0%Rimer 18 80 4500.0%Ritzman 43 65 27600.0%Robinson 254 287 3200.0%Sam Salem 57 60 9400.0%Schumacher 66 84 23600.0%Seiberling 236 223 5700.0%Smith 56 69 2600.0%Voris 52 19 2500.0%Windemere 43 16 10990.9%District Average 128 122
Total Year To Date ADA Through December 17, 2010King 96.7%Resnik 96.6%Essex 96.3%Betty Jane 96.2%Bettes 96.0%Windemere 95.9%Helen Arnold 95.8%Pfeiffer 95.8%Voris 95.8%Hatton 95.7%Rankin 95.6%Firestone Park 95.5%Glover 95.4%Ritzman 95.4%Portage Path 95.3%Barber 95.2%Case 95.2%Schumacher 95.2%Forest Hill 95.1%Rimer 95.1%DISTRICT ELEM 95.1%Crouse 94.9%Harris 94.9%Leggett 94.7%David Hill 94.6%Lawndale 94.6%Sam Salem 94.6%Smith 94.5%Findley 94.4%Mason 94.4%DISTRICT K-12 94.3%Robinson 94.2%Seiberling 94.1%Barrett 92.9%McEbright 92.4%
Total Year To Date ADA Through January 20, 2011Resnik 96.5%King 96.4%Essex 96.2%Bettes 95.7%Helen Arnold 95.6%Betty Jane 95.5%
Voris 95.5%Windemere 95.5%Hatton 95.4%Pfeiffer 95.4%Firestone Park 95.3%Rankin 95.3%Glover 95.2%Case 95.1%Portage Path 95.1%Ritzman 95.1%Barber 95.0%Schumacher 94.9%Forest Hill 94.7%District ELEM 94.7%Crouse 94.6%Rimer 94.6%Harris 94.4%Hill 94.3%Leggett 94.3%Smith 94.3%Sam Salem 94.1%District (K-12) 94.1%Lawndale 94.0%Findley 93.9%Mason 93.9%Seiberling 93.8%Robinson 93.7%Barrett 92.3%Bridges 92.3%McEbright 92.1%
Total Year To Date ADA Through February 28, 2011King 1.0Resnik 1.0Essex 1.0Bettes 1.0Helen Arnold 1.0Voris 1.0Pfeiffer 1.0Windemere 1.0Betty Jane 1.0Hatton 1.0Firestone Park 1.0Rankin 1.0Glover 0.9Portage Path 0.9Ritzman 0.9Case 0.9Barber 0.9Schumacher 0.9District (ELEM) 0.9Crouse 0.9Forest Hill 0.9Rimer 0.9Harris 0.9Smith 0.9Hill 0.9Leggett 0.9Findley 0.9District (K-12) 0.9Sam Salem 0.9Lawndale 0.9Seiberling 0.9Mason 0.9Robinson 0.9Bridges 0.9Barrett 0.9McEbright 0.9
OSS2006-2007
Helen ArnoldCrousePortage PathRankinSchumacherDISTRICT
OSS2006-2007
BarberDavid HillMasonRobinsonSeiberlingDISTRICT
OSS2006-2007
BettesFindleyForest HillHarrisLeggettDISTRICT
OSS2006-2007
CaseEssexKingResnikDISTRICT
OSS2006-2007
OSS2006-2007
BarrettFirestone ParkGloverMcEbrightVorisDISTRICT
2006-2007LawndalePfeifferRimerSam SalemSmithDISTRICT
2009-2010 2009-2010Incidents Days
95 165100 191
45 6247 60
199 330215 485
77 155152 233
78 10528 59
189 419164 314
21 42160 283202 439
12 1139 8820 29
264 481235 454
51 88176 324176 364
43 5148 6445 82
276 45632 3994 191
236 40557 8526 4925 40
110 201
King 96.7%Resnik 96.6%Essex 96.3%Betty Jane 96.2%Bettes 96.0%Windemere 95.9%Helen Arnold 95.8%Pfeiffer 95.8%Voris 95.8%Hatton 95.7%Rankin 95.6%Firestone Park 95.5%Glover 95.4%Ritzman 95.4%Portage Path 95.3%Barber 95.2%Case 95.2%Schumacher 95.2%Forest Hill 95.1%Rimer 95.1%Crouse 94.9%Harris 94.9%Leggett 94.7%David Hill 94.6%Lawndale 94.6%Sam Salem 94.6%Smith 94.5%Findley 94.4%
Mason 94.4%Robinson 94.2%Seiberling 94.1%Barrett 92.9%McEbright 92.4%
95.1%
Total Year To Date ADA Through January 31, 2011King 96.4%Resnik 96.4%Essex 96.2%Bettes 95.7%Helen Arnold 95.5%
Voris 95.5%Pfeiffer 95.4%Windemere 95.4%Betty Jane 95.3%Hatton 95.3%Firestone Park 95.2%Rankin 95.2%Glover 95.1%Portage Path 95.1%Ritzman 95.1%Case 95.0%Barber 94.9%Schumacher 94.9%District (ELEM) 94.7%Crouse 94.5%Forest Hill 94.5%Rimer 94.5%Harris 94.3%Smith 94.3%Hill 94.2%Leggett 94.2%Findley 94.1%District (K-12) 94.0%Sam Salem 94.0%Lawndale 93.9%Seiberling 93.8%Mason 93.7%Robinson 93.7%Bridges 92.5%Barrett 92.2%McEbright 92.1%
Total Year To Date ADA Through February 28, 2011Resnik 96.3King 96.2Essex 96.0Bettes 95.4Voris 95.3Helen Arnold 95.2Betty Jane 95.1Glover 95.0Hatton 95.0Pfeiffer 95.0Ritzman 95.0Windemere 95.0Firestone Park 94.9Schumacher 94.9Case 94.8Portage Path 94.8Rankin 94.8Barber 94.6District (ELEM) 94.3Crouse 94.2Forest Hill 94.2Rimer 94.2Findley 94.0Harris 94.0Hill 93.9Smith 93.9Leggett 93.8District (K-12) 93.8Lawndale 93.7Mason 93.6Sam Salem 93.6Seiberling 93.6Robinson 93.4Bridges 92.2McEbright 91.9Barrett 91.6
Total Year To Date ADA Through June 10, 2011
King 96.0%Resnik 96.0%Essex 95.7%Bettes 95.1%Betty Jane 94.9%Voris 94.9%Hatton 94.8%Windemere 94.8%Case 94.7%Helen Arnold 94.7%Firestone Park 94.6%Ritzman 94.6%Schumacher 94.6%Pfeiffer 94.5%Glover 94.3%Portage Path 94.3%Barber 94.2%Crouse 94.2%Rankin 94.2%Rimer 94.1%District(ELEM) 94.1%Harris 94.0%Forest Hill 93.8%Hill 93.8%Findley 93.7%DISTRICT(K-12) 93.6%Seiberling 93.6%Sam Salem 93.3%Smith 93.3%Leggett 93.2%Mason 93.2%Lawndale 93.1%Robinson 92.7%Bridges 92.1%McEbright 92.0%Barrett 91.0%
2008-2009 2009-2010
2008-2009 2009-2010
2008-2009 2009-2010
2008-2009 2009-2010
2008-2009 2009-2010
2008-2009 2009-2010
2008-2009 2009-2010
Total Year To Date ADA Through October 29, 2010 ResnikKing 97.2% KingResnik 97.2% EssexEssex 96.9% Betty JanePfeiffer 96.9% Helen ArnoldVoris 96.9% BettesBettes 96.8% PfeifferBetty Jane 96.7% RankinHelen Arnold 96.5% VorisHatton 96.4% Firestone ParkRankin 96.4% GloverFirestone Park 96.2% HattonGlover 96.2% RitzmanRitzman 96.2% Portage PathLeggett 96.0% BarberWindemere 96.0% Forest HillCrouse 95.9% SchumacherPortage Path 95.9% CaseRimer 95.9% HarrisSmith 95.9% RimerBarber 95.8% CrouseCase 95.8% LeggettForest Hill 95.8% SmithHarris 95.8% FindleySchumacher 95.8% WindemereFindley 95.6% David HillLawndale 95.6% LawndaleSam Salem 95.4% MasonRobinson 95.2% Sam SalemDISTRICT 95.1% RobinsonMason 95.1% DISTRICTDavid Hill 95.0% SeiberlingSeiberling 94.9% BarrettBarrett 93.8% McEbrightBridges 92.6% BridgesMcEbright 92.4%
Number of Incidents Through 10/29/10 # OSS Suspended Days Through 10/29/10Barber 22 Barber 6.5Barrett 35 Barrett 4.5Bettes 3 Bettes 0Betty Jane 39 Betty Jane 1Case 46 Case 14Crouse 54 Crouse 27David Hill 55 David Hill 3DISTRICT DISTRICTEssex 14 Essex 0Findley 56 Findley 12.5Firestone Park 15 Firestone Park 11Forest Hill 15 Forest Hill 0Glover 84 Glover 19Harris 35 Harris 1Hatton 5 Hatton 0Helen Arnold 13 Helen Arnold 2King 18 King 0Lawndale 9 Lawndale 0Leggett 2 Leggett 5Mason 63 Mason 14McEbright 59 McEbright 35Pfeiffer 15 Pfeiffer 17Portage Path 35 Portage Path 20Rankin 36 Rankin 50Resnik 28 Resnik 0Rimer 2 Rimer 0Ritzman 7 Ritzman 0Robinson 57 Robinson 51Sam Salem 31 Sam Salem 1Schumacher 15 Schumacher 1Seiberling 58 Seiberling 2Smith 14 Smith 1Voris 2 Voris 1Windemere 3 Windemere 2
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010Days Suspended Days Suspended Days Suspended
Barber 197 208 165Barrett 744 733 191Bettes 96 77 62Betty Jane 110 72 60Case 367 228 330Crouse 378 347 485Essex 129 141 155Findley 423 370 233Firestone Park 159 123 105Forest Hill 118 85 59Glover 599 471 419Harris 238 342 314Hatton 46 84 42Helen Arnold 459 365 283Hill 564 436 439King 34 12 11Lawndale 97 80 88Leggett 11 13 29Mason 339 555 481McEbright 151 256 454Pfeiffer 136 75 88Portage Path 446 270 324Rankin 446 471 364Resnik 65 82 51Rimer 27 103 64Ritzman 71 156 82Robinson 404 422 456Sam Salem 116 131 39Schumacher 113 155 191Seiberling 496 334 405Smith 82 104 85Voris 80 25 49Windemere 101 28 40District Average 238 223 201
Total Year To Date ADA Through January 31, 2011
Total Year To Date ADA Through February 28, 2011 Total Year To Date ADA Through March 31, 2011Resnik 96.2%King 96.0%Essex 95.9%Bettes 95.3%Helen Arnold 95.2%Hatton 95.0%Voris 95.0%Betty Jane 94.9%Ritzman 94.9%Windemere 94.9%Schumacher 94.8%Case 94.7%Firestone Park 94.7%Glover 94.7%Pfeiffer 94.7%Portage Path 94.6%Rankin 94.6%Barber 94.3%Crouse 94.3%DISTRICT ELEM 94.3%Rimer 94.2%Forest Hill 94.0%Harris 94.0%Findley 93.9%Lawndale 93.8%Hill 93.7%Seiberling 93.7%Smith 93.7%DISTRICT (K-12) 93.7%Leggett 93.5%Sam Salem 93.5%Mason 93.4%Robinson 93.1%McEbright 92.3%Bridges 92.2%Barrett 91.4%
Total Year To Date ADA Through June 10, 2011 Total Year To Date ADA Through April 29, 2011
Resnik 96.2%Essex 95.9%King 95.9%Bettes 95.2%Helen Arnold 95.1%Voris 95.0%Betty Jane 94.9%Hatton 94.9%Windemere 94.9%Schumacher 94.8%Case 94.7%Firestone Park 94.7%Glover 94.7%Ritzman 94.7%Pfeiffer 94.6%Portage Path 94.6%Crouse 94.4%Rankin 94.4%Barber 94.3%DISTRICT ELEM 94.3%Rimer 94.2%Forest Hill 94.0%Harris 94.0%Findley 93.9%Seiberling 93.8%DISTRICT (K-12) 93.7%Hill 93.7%Lawndale 93.6%Smith 93.6%Leggett 93.5%Sam Salem 93.5%Mason 93.4%Robinson 93.1%McEbright 92.3%Bridges 92.0%Barrett 91.4%
Total Year To Date ADA Through November 30, 201096.9%96.8%96.5%96.4%96.4%96.2%96.2%96.1%96.0%95.9%95.9%95.9%95.8%95.7%95.6%95.5%95.5%95.4%95.4%95.4%95.3%95.2%95.2%95.1%95.1%94.9%94.9%94.9%94.9%94.7%94.6%94.6%93.6%92.9%92.8%
# OSS Suspended Days Through 10/29/10
Total Year To Date ADA Through March 31, 2011
Total Year To Date ADA Through April 29, 2011
Bettes
Essex
Fores
t Hill
Hatton
King
Lawndale
Resnik
Rimer
Ritzman
Betty J
ane
Harris
Sam Sa
lem
Schumach
erSm
ithVoris
Helen Arn
old
Seiberl
ing
Windem
ere
David Hill
Barrett
Legge
ttBarb
er
Firest
one Park
Findley Case
Mason
Pfeiffer
Glover
Portage
Path
Crouse
McEbrig
ht
Rankin
Robinson
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 34.5 5
6.5
1112.5
14 1417
19 20
27
35
50 51
Akron Public SchoolsNumber of Suspended Days
9/1/10 Through 10/29/10
Legge
ttRim
erVoris
Bettes
Windem
ere
Hatton
Ritzman
Lawndale
Helen Arn
oldEss
exSm
ith
Firest
one Park
Fores
t Hill
Pfeiffer
Schumach
erKing
Barber
Resnik
Sam Sa
lemBarr
ettHarr
is
Portage
Path
Rankin
Betty J
ane
Case
Crouse
David Hill
Findley
Robinson
Seiberl
ing
McEbrig
ht
MasonGlove
r0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2 2 2 3 35
79
13 14 14 15 15 15 1518
22
2831
35 35 35 3639
46
54 55 56 57 58 5963
84
Akron Public SchoolsNumber of Discipline Incidents
9/1/10 Through 10/29/10
2006-20072007-20082008-20092009-2010Barber 75 58 65 55Barrett 123 129 104 55Bettes 41 41 35 23Betty Jane 43 48 27 32Case 53 86 69 93Crouse 98 85 90 99Erie Island 37 35 24Essex 50 40 46 46Findley 123 110 94 81Firestone Park 106 51 48 52Forest Hill 51 44 30 23Glover 88 107 109 116Harris 52 73 73 91Hatton 24 18 27 19Helen Arnold 109 96 91Hill 61 107 88 102King 15 15 7 10Lawndale 26 40 23 26Leggett 26 13 9 29Mason 64 100 125 113McEbright 80 72 79 117Pfeiffer 37 42 38 38Portage Path 97 121 79 97Rankin 114 102 92 102Resnik 34 26 27 31Rimer 11 15 37 31Ritzman 22 31 34 39Robinson 96 115 122 107Sam Salem 25 37 39 24Schumacher 86 45 52 47Seiberling 122 101 95 113Smith 32 37 39 31Stewart 34 27 27 8Voris 48 28 17 17Windemere 20 22 14 14
Number of Incidents Through 10/29/10
Leggett 2Rimer 2Voris 2Bettes 3Windemere 3Hatton 5Ritzman 7Lawndale 9Helen Arnold 13Essex 14Smith 14Firestone Park 15Forest Hill 15Pfeiffer 15Schumacher 15King 18Barber 22Resnik 28Sam Salem 31Barrett 35Harris 35Portage Path 35Rankin 36Betty Jane 39Case 46Crouse 54David Hill 55Findley 56Robinson 57Seiberling 58McEbright 59Mason 63Glover 84
# OSS Suspended Days Through 10/29/10Bettes 0Essex 0Forest Hill 0
Hatton 0King 0Lawndale 0Resnik 0Rimer 0Ritzman 0Betty Jane 1Harris 1Sam Salem 1Schumacher 1Smith 1Voris 1Helen Arnold 2Seiberling 2Windemere 2David Hill 3Barrett 4.5Leggett 5Barber 6.5Firestone Park 11Findley 12.5Case 14Mason 14Pfeiffer 17Glover 19Portage Path 20Crouse 27McEbright 35Rankin 50Robinson 51
