2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16...

17
2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th , 2011 1

Transcript of 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16...

Page 1: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

1

2011 Annual Performance Review

Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst

City of Vancouver, Washington May 16th, 2011

Page 2: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

2

Community Strategic Indicators - 2010 Report

Summary of Changes

Trends and Analysis

Changes on the horizon

Performance Snapshot Workshops

Timeline of presentations

Changes on the horizon

Agenda

Page 3: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

3

• Citizen designed• Staff produced• No numbers,

charts• Six outcomes,

each with eight measureswww.cityofvancouver.us/

strategicindicators

- Healthy, Livable & Sustainable

- Transportation, Mobility & Connectivity

- Financial Health & Economic Vitality

- Accountable, Responsive Government

- Safe & Prepared Community- Active, Involved Community

Page 4: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

4

Strategic Indicators: Economy & Safety are the drivers

www.cityofvancouver.us/strategicindicators

Page 5: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

5

Page 6: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

Star means data comes from community survey

6

Page 7: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

7

Page 8: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

8

Page 9: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

9

Page 10: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

10

Page 11: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

11

• Community is more active in many ways

• Residents generally satisfied with service levels although some core services are degrading

• External financial conditions: still negative

• City is managing the financial situation well

• Quality of life: noticeable erosion by early 2010

• Perception of safety is good, but crime is up

• Traffic safety was a high point

Community Strategic Indicators -Trends

Page 12: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

12

•Reduce time and effort to populate

data

•Reset some goals where appropriate

•Communicate more, improve context

•Survey focus: Should it be how well

we meet expectations or satisfaction?

• Adjust indicators with public input…

Community Strategic Indicators -Future

Page 13: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

13

Community (Informational) Outcomes & Indicators

Used to inform the public, inform strategic directions

Tend to focus on annual (or longer) trends

Often include a more complete view of the processes

Organizational (Management) Outcomes & Indicators

Used to inform decisions, manage the organization

Annually, quarterly, monthly

Focus on our part of the process

Time intensive

An Emerging Issue: The Community vs Management View of Information

Page 14: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

14

Indicator: Emergency Medical Response time

•Organization view: Department response time• Time from department notification to arrival of their first unit (only our specific unit responses)

•Community view: Total community response time• Time from initial call to 911 center to arrival of any help on scene

Issue Example: EMS Response

Page 15: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

15

Positives about business plans

- Departments understand their businesses better

- Quantify deliverables, outcomes desired, key processes

- Plan for the future based on the expected environment

- Nearly all direct services have completed one, many others

Negatives:

- Very time intensive

- Depend on a relatively stable future to be effective, and that is not the case now

- Resources not available to work Business Plans and evolve to BI over next two years; One needs to be “on hold”

Business Plans: Near term hold on new work

Page 16: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

16

2011 Presentations:

May 16 – Public Works (Today)

June 13 – Police

July 11 –Law & Fire

Future of Performance Reporting:

Oracle Business Intelligence: a leap

Dramatically reduce effort for basic data

Timely, data-informed analysis & decisions

Annual Performance Reporting “Snapshots”

Page 17: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1.

17

Questions?

 

Tom NosackPerformance AnalystCity of Vancouver, Washingtonphone: (360) 487-8474 Email: [email protected]

"In the absence of clearly-defined goals, we become strangely loyal to performing daily trivia until ultimately we become enslaved by it." - Robert Heinlein