2011-2012 Academic Progress Plan Results. Two Topics to be Covered ASD DCAS results relative to...

2011-2012 Academic Progress Plan Results

Two Topics to be Covered

• ASD DCAS results relative to other Delaware school districts.

• 2011 2012 SY Performance data on the ASD’s Academic Progress Plan

Appoquinimink DCAS Rankings by Grade

Reading DCAS Rank

2006 Rank

2007 Rank

2008 Rank

2009 Rank

2010 Rank

2011 Rank

2012 Rank

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Elementary Reading DCAS Rankings

3rd4th5th

Ra

nk

in S

tate

Reading DCAS Rank

2006 Rank

2007 Rank

2008 Rank

2009 Rank

2010 Rank

2011 Rank

2012 Rank

123456789

10

Middle School Reading DCAS Rank-ings

6th7th8th

Ra

nk

in S

tate

Reading DCAS Rank

2006 Rank

2007 Rank

2008 Rank

2009 Rank

2010 Rank

2011 Rank

2012 Rank

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

High School Reading DCAS Rankings

9th10th

Ra

nk

in S

tate

Math DCAS Rank

2006 Rank

2007 Rank

2008 Rank

2009 Rank

2010 Rank

2011 Rank

2012 Rank

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Elementary Math DCAS Rankings

3rd4th5th

Ra

nk

in S

tate

Math DCAS Rank

2006 Rank

2007 Rank

2008 Rank

2009 Rank

2010 Rank

2011 Rank

2012 Rank

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Middle School Math DCAS Rankings

6th7th8th

Ra

nk

in S

tate

Math DCAS Rank

2006 Rank

2007 Rank

2008 Rank

2009 Rank

2010 Rank

2011 Rank

2012 Rank

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

High School Math DCAS Rankings

9th10th

Ra

nk

in S

tate

Appoquinimink 2011-2012 Goal

Performance

Strategic Plan

• 15 goals were identified– “15 for 2015”

• Specific measurable goals were developed using 2010-2011 data as the baseline

Strategic Plan

• Many of the goals were developed with the goal of reducing the number of students in the “unwanted” category by half in 2015.

• Some data is still in the process of being collected (for example, district-level College Board data is not made available until late September).

4 Large-Scale Goals

1. Academic Achievement2. College and Career Readiness3. Meeting Diverse Student Needs4. Fostering Parent/Community

Partnerships

Goals are taken from the 2012-2015 Plan

Goal 1: Increase student achievement in all academic disciplines

1. Strategic Objective

Related Goal Sponsors Measures2011-2012

Target2011-2012

Actual2014-2015

TargetImprove student

achievement through the

implementation of Common

Core Standards through the use

of district identified,

research-based strategies.

1

Superintendent

Assistant Superintendent

The percentage of ASD students

who meet or exceed the

standards in ELA, Math, Science and

Social Studies will annually

increase

ELA: 74.5%Math: 76%

Science: 61.5%SS: 77%

ELA: 84%Math: 83%

Science: 66%SS: 76%

ELA: 85.5%Math: 86.5%Science:78%

SS: 87%

Goal 1: Increase student achievement in all academic disciplines



Target2011-2012

Actual2014-2015

Target

Common assessments are

documented1

Curriculum Directors

Coordinator of

Research

Percent of common

assessments results

documented on data system for science, social

studies, math and English language

arts.

20% Approximately

10%80%

Goal 2: Ensure students leave Appoquinimink college and career ready

1. Strategic ObjectiveRelated

GoalSponsors Measures

2011-2012 Target

2011-2012 Actual

2014-2015 Target

Promote and support activities that prepare

students for college level coursework

2

Director of Secondary Education

Increased enrollment in

honors, AP and dual enrollment

courses at the high school level.

College

enrollment rates

Dual enrollment courses =20

students

Honors enrollment=

3632

AP = 600 seats

College Enrollment:

71%


students

Honors enrollment=

3532

AP = 600 seats

College

Enrollment: 73%


students

Honors enrollment=

4151

AP = 600 seats

College Enrollment:

81%

Goal 2: Ensure students leave Appoquinimink college and career ready



2011-2012 Target

2011-2012 Actual

2014-2015 Target

Provide supports to ensure all students earn their high school

diplomas in four years2


Supervisor

ofStudent Services

Increased graduation rates;

Decreased dropout rates

Number of dropouts not

attending Groves

NGA Grad. Rate: 91%

Dropout

rate: 2.1%

Non-Groves

dropouts: 25

NGA Grad.

Rate: N/A

Dropout rate: N/A

Non-

Groves dropouts:

25

NGA Grad. Rate: 94%

Dropout

rate: 1.2%

Non-Groves

dropouts: 10

Goal 3: Meet the needs of a diverse group of learners



2011-2012

Target

2011-2012

Actual

2014-2015

Target

Ensure that special education students at the elementary level meet the same level of academic success as our peers in the state

of Delaware.

3

Supervisor of Special Education

Director of Elementary Education

The percentage of ASD elementary special

education students who meet or exceed the

standards will exceed the state percentage

8% Below

4% Below (Math)

2%

Below (ELA)

5% above state

Elementary Special Education Performance

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

-15

-10

-5

0

5

Gap Between Appoquinimink and Del-aware in terms of Elementary Special Education Students Meeting the Stan-

dard

Reading Gap between Appo and Delaware Special Ed

% D

iffe

ren

ce

Be

twe

en

AS

D a

nd

DE




2011-2012

Target

2011-2012

Actual

2014-2015

Target

Ensure that special education students at grades 6-12 meet

continued academic improvement3

Supervisor of Special Education


DCAS current baselines and reduce % not meeting

by half in 2014-2015

ELA Grades

6-8: 32%

Math Grades

6-8: 31%

ELA Grades 9-10: 37%

Math

Grades 9-10: 30%

ELA Grades

6-8: 41%

Math

Grades 6-8: 34%

ELA

Grades 9-10: 28%

Math

Grades 9-10: 36%

ELA Grades 6-

8: 61%

Math Grades 6-

8: 61%

ELA Grades 9-10: 64%

Math

Grades 9-10: 60%




2011-2012

Target

2011-2012

Actual

2014-2015

Target

Students new to ASD will experience academic success

within one year of entry3

Coordinator of Research,

Development and Evaluation

Supervisor of

Student Services

The achievement gap between new and

existing students will annually decrease.

8% gap

10% gap for Math and ELA

2% gap




2011-2012

Target

2011-2012

Actual

2014-2015

Target

Through rigorous and challenging classroom experiences, students will reach the highest level of

academic achievement.

3

Curriculum Directors

Increase of the % of students at performance

level 4 on the DCAS assessment

Increase in the % of

students at PL 4 and 5 on AP assessments

ELA: 46% Math: 33% AP % at PL 4 or 5: 41%

ELA: 54% Math: 37% AP % at PL 4 or 5: N/A

ELA: 59% Math: 49% AP % at PL 4 or 5: 45%




Target2011-2012

Actual2014-2015

Target

Ensure that all students,

regardless of background,

receive a high quality

education

3

Superintendent

Assistant Superintendent

Annually decrease the

achievement gap between target

groups: black/white; non low income/low income; spec.

ed/non spec. ed

Black-white reading gap: 15% Black-white math gap: 17% Low income-non low income reading gap: 17% Low income- non low income math gap:19% Spec. ed.- non spec. ed. reading gap: 50% Spec. ed.-non spec. ed. math gap: 52%

Black-white reading gap: 13% Black-white math gap: 13% Low income-non low income reading gap: 18% Low income- non low income math gap:17% Spec. ed.- non spec. ed. reading gap: 49% Spec. ed.-non spec. ed. math gap: 50%

Black-white reading gap: 9% Black-white math gap: 10% Low income-non low income reading gap: 10% Low income- non low income math gap: 11% Spec. ed.- non spec. ed. reading gap: 29% Spec. ed.-non spec. ed. math gap: 30%

Goal 4: Promote a healthy, inclusive, and effective learning environment



2011-2012 Target

2011-2012 Actual

2014-2015 Target

Improve the % of minority teachers in district schools,

recruiting efforts will be expanded

4

Director of

Human Resources

Increase the diversity of

the instructional workforce

Percent of instructional

workforce that is nonwhite:

11%


workforce that is

nonwhite: 9%


workforce that is nonwhite:

14%

Goal 4: Promote a healthy, inclusive, and effective learning environment



2011-2012 Target

2011-2012 Actual

2014-2015 Target

Improve parent and community outreach and

communications4

Public Information

Officer

Parent satisfaction survey

Number of

volunteer hours

Number of student mentoring hours

Survey to be

developed

Volunteer hours:22,000

Student

mentoring hours:1775

Survey to be

developed


Student


Survey to be

developed


Student


Overall

• Had a successful year as a district– Met State and Federal Goals– Met a large number of our internal goals– Increased or maintained our standing

relative to our peers in the state• In terms of measurables, best student

achievement results in the past four years.

2011-2012 Academic Progress Plan Results. Two Topics to be Covered ASD DCAS results relative to...

Documents

Transcript of 2011-2012 Academic Progress Plan Results. Two Topics to be Covered ASD DCAS results relative to...