2010 Election Automation Scenario
-
Upload
kris-ablan -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of 2010 Election Automation Scenario
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
1/36
May 10, 2010 National
and Local Elections
AUTOMATION
SCENARIO
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
2/36
STATISTICS
Estimated 47,000,000 registered voters 44,009,069 registered voters - as of April 20, 2009 ERB
Hearing 58,327 registration records cancelled by reason of death
1,246,272 registration records deactivated
Last ERB Hearing on November 16, 2009
80 Provinces
1,631 cities and municipalities
320,415 Established Precincts (estimate)
80,136 Clustered Precincts (estimate) 37,884 Polling Centers (estimate)
82,200 PCOS Machines
80,136 PCOS Machines for distribution to
clustered precincts
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
3/36
Board of Election Inspectors
One (1) BEI for every clusteredprecinct Three regular members
Chairman Delivers ballot to voter
Poll Clerk
Third Member
Support Staff Depends on number of precincts clustered
To assist Poll Clerk and Third Member inmanaging
List of Voters with Voting Records Book of Voters
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
4/36
Board of Election Inspectors
No. ofPrecinctsClustered
No. ofSupport
Staff
Total no. ofpersonnel
(BEI + SupportStaff)
0 none 3
2 none 3
3 1 4
4 2 5
5 3 6
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
5/36
Establishing Identity ofVoter LIST OF
VOTERS WITHVOTING
RECORDS
Photograph
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
6/36
Establishing Identity ofVoter
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
7/36
Establishing Identity ofVoter If identity cannot be established
through photograph
Compare signatures
Use Book of Voters Contains applications for registration
Includes specimen signature of voter
Other methods to challenge identity
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
8/36
Official Ballots
Pre-printednames ofcandidates
300candidatescan be
accommodated
150 names
per side of
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
9/36
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
10/36
Official Ballots
Ovals oppositenames ofcandidate
Shade ovalopposite name ofchosen candidate
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
11/36
PCOS Precinct Count Optical Scan
One unit perclusteredprecinct
Voter personallyfeeds ballot intomachine
Ballot can be fedat any orientation
Ballot scannedboth sides
simultaneously
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
12/36
TESTING & SEALINGPROCEDURES
At least three days before election day
Public shall accomplish test ballots
Ballots shall be manually counted and election returnsaccomplished
Same set of ballots that was manually counted shall be fed
into the counting machine
Manual count shall be compared with the print-out of theelection returns
If public is satisfied that the manual count is the same as theautomated count, the print-out and manually preparedelection returns shall be signed-off by the witnesses
Machines shall be sealed without any connection totransmission links
Public shall be allowed to secure the polling places where
the counting machines are installed The only time that the counting machines shall be opened is
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
13/36
Voting
Voting period
7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Unless there are voters waiting for their turn
to vote Poll Clerk lists down names voters queuing
Poll Clerk calls voter to cast ballot
Voter who fails to appear after being called twice
shall not longer be allowed to vote Precinct set up
At least 10 voters can cast ballot at any onetime
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
14/36
Voting
Before voting starts
Show that ballotbox is empty
Transparent plastic
Turn on andinitialize PCOS
Print Zero ReportTo show that there is
no entry/vote inmachines memory
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
15/36
Counting
At close of polls Perform close
function
To preventadditional ballotsfrom being inserted
After close function,
PCOS automatically Starts countingprocess
Prints electionreturns after
completion of
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
16/36
Counting
Insert transmission cable
After printing first eight (8) copies ofER
To eliminate doubts that the PCOS can bemanipulated remotely
Perform electronic transmission
function Print additional twenty-two (22)
copies of ER
Automatically performed by PCOS
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
17/36
Canvassing/Consolidation
Electronically transmitted results Used as basis for canvassing/consolidation
and proclamation of winning candidates for City/municipal officials
Provincial officials
Members, House of Representatives
Senators and Party-list
Congress will also receive electronicallytransmitted results Constitution authorized the Congress to
promulgate rules for canvassing of results forPresident and Vice-President
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
18/36
Munici pa l/C ityBoa rd ofCanvassers
Provin ci alBoa rd ofCanvassers
Na tion alBoa rd ofCanvassers
Co ng re ss CO MELEC
Precin ctEle ct ion Re tu rn s
Mun./City COCSOVP
Pro v. CO CSOVM/C
Physicaltransport
Physicaltransport
Physical
transport
Manual
System ofCanvassing
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
19/36
Munici pa l/C ityBoa rd ofCanvassers
Provin ci alBoa rd ofCanvassers
Na tion alBoa rd ofCanvassers
Co ng re ss CO MELEC
Precin ct
Physicaltransport
Physicaltransport
Physical
transport
Electronic
Transmission
Come le c Cen tra lBa ck-up Serve rAdv ance Resu lts /Monito ring
Server forDomi nantMajori ty/ Min orit yParties, CitizensArm, KBPAdv ance Resu lts
Secur edPublicWebsite
Ele ct ion Re tu rn s
Mun./City COCSOVP
Pro v. CO CSOVM/C
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
20/36
SECURITY
Security measures under a manualelection system still applicable
Strengthen security throughautomation
Password
PIN
Digital signatures
Encryption
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
21/36
SECURITY
128-bitencryption 2
2 = 4
2 = 8
2 = 16
2 = 32 2 = 64
2 = 128
2 = 256
128
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2 = 512
2 = 1024
2 = 2048
2 = 4096
2 = 8192 2 = 16,384
2 = 32,768
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
2 =
65,536 2 =
131,072
2 =
262,144 2 =
524,288
2 =
1,048,576
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
22/36
SECURITY
128-bit encryption
2 =
8,388,608 2 =
16,777,216
2 =
33,554,432 2 =
67,108,864
2 =
134,217,728
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
2 =
1,073,741,824 2 =
2,147,483,648
2 =
4,294,967,296 2 =
8,569,934,592
2 =
17,179,869,184
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
23/36
SECURITY
128-bit encryption
2 = 137,438,953,472
2 = 274,877,906,944
2 = 549,755,813,888
2 = over One Trillion combinations
37
38
39
40
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
24/36
SECURITY
128-bit encryption
Same security system used by banks
Random Encryption
Temperature of machine
Voltage
Unique machine identity
User identity
No single/master decryption code
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
25/36
SECURITY
Time needed to decrypt one precinctresult will be same amount of timeneeded to decrypt next precinct result
Transmission takes at most 2 minutes
Copies for distribution
30 copies of election returns at the precinct
level 30 copies of certificate of canvass at
municipal level
14 copies of certificate of canvass at
provincial level
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
26/36
SECURITY
Audit Log
Activities
Time
Date
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
27/36
SECURITY
Paper Ballot
Ballot digital image
Data storage device Transmitted results
Hard copies of election results
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
28/36
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
29/36
CONTINUITY PLAN
Types of Systems Breakdown
Fails to scan
Able to scan but fails to print ER
Able to print ER but fails to transmit
Able to transmit but fails to consolidate
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
30/36
CONTINUITY PLAN
Fails to scan
Use spare PCOS
Use PCOS of another precinct
Wait for other PCOS to complete process inits precinct
Get PCOS and reconfigure for next precinct
Scan ballots
If all PCOS fails
Manual counting
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
31/36
CONTINUITY PLAN
Able to scan but fails to print ER
Use spare PCOS
Use PCOS of another precinct
Wait for other PCOS to complete process inits precinct
Get PCOS and reconfigure for next precinct
Use removable storage device of defective
PCOS and let replacement PCOS print ER
If all PCOS fails
Manual counting
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
32/36
CONTINUITY PLAN
Able to print ER but fails to transmit
Go to nearest precinct or polling centerwhich has a functioning transmission
facility Use removable storage device of defective
PCOS and let the functioning facilitytransmit precinct results
If all transmission facilities bog down
Physically transport removable storagedevice to canvassing site
In the presence of watchers and security escorts
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
33/36
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
34/36
Basic Elements of Elections
People Vote-buying
Coercion
Intimidation
Terrorism
Systems &Procedures Misreading of
ballots
Unreadablehandwriting
Error Honest
Deliberate Fraud
Manufacturedelection returns
Tampering ofelection results
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
35/36
Successful Implementation
Vigilance of citizenry
Cooperation
Coordination Support
-
8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario
36/36
THANK YOU!