2010 Election Automation Scenario

download 2010 Election Automation Scenario

of 36

Transcript of 2010 Election Automation Scenario

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    1/36

    May 10, 2010 National

    and Local Elections

    AUTOMATION

    SCENARIO

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    2/36

    STATISTICS

    Estimated 47,000,000 registered voters 44,009,069 registered voters - as of April 20, 2009 ERB

    Hearing 58,327 registration records cancelled by reason of death

    1,246,272 registration records deactivated

    Last ERB Hearing on November 16, 2009

    80 Provinces

    1,631 cities and municipalities

    320,415 Established Precincts (estimate)

    80,136 Clustered Precincts (estimate) 37,884 Polling Centers (estimate)

    82,200 PCOS Machines

    80,136 PCOS Machines for distribution to

    clustered precincts

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    3/36

    Board of Election Inspectors

    One (1) BEI for every clusteredprecinct Three regular members

    Chairman Delivers ballot to voter

    Poll Clerk

    Third Member

    Support Staff Depends on number of precincts clustered

    To assist Poll Clerk and Third Member inmanaging

    List of Voters with Voting Records Book of Voters

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    4/36

    Board of Election Inspectors

    No. ofPrecinctsClustered

    No. ofSupport

    Staff

    Total no. ofpersonnel

    (BEI + SupportStaff)

    0 none 3

    2 none 3

    3 1 4

    4 2 5

    5 3 6

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    5/36

    Establishing Identity ofVoter LIST OF

    VOTERS WITHVOTING

    RECORDS

    Photograph

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    6/36

    Establishing Identity ofVoter

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    7/36

    Establishing Identity ofVoter If identity cannot be established

    through photograph

    Compare signatures

    Use Book of Voters Contains applications for registration

    Includes specimen signature of voter

    Other methods to challenge identity

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    8/36

    Official Ballots

    Pre-printednames ofcandidates

    300candidatescan be

    accommodated

    150 names

    per side of

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    9/36

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    10/36

    Official Ballots

    Ovals oppositenames ofcandidate

    Shade ovalopposite name ofchosen candidate

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    11/36

    PCOS Precinct Count Optical Scan

    One unit perclusteredprecinct

    Voter personallyfeeds ballot intomachine

    Ballot can be fedat any orientation

    Ballot scannedboth sides

    simultaneously

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    12/36

    TESTING & SEALINGPROCEDURES

    At least three days before election day

    Public shall accomplish test ballots

    Ballots shall be manually counted and election returnsaccomplished

    Same set of ballots that was manually counted shall be fed

    into the counting machine

    Manual count shall be compared with the print-out of theelection returns

    If public is satisfied that the manual count is the same as theautomated count, the print-out and manually preparedelection returns shall be signed-off by the witnesses

    Machines shall be sealed without any connection totransmission links

    Public shall be allowed to secure the polling places where

    the counting machines are installed The only time that the counting machines shall be opened is

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    13/36

    Voting

    Voting period

    7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

    Unless there are voters waiting for their turn

    to vote Poll Clerk lists down names voters queuing

    Poll Clerk calls voter to cast ballot

    Voter who fails to appear after being called twice

    shall not longer be allowed to vote Precinct set up

    At least 10 voters can cast ballot at any onetime

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    14/36

    Voting

    Before voting starts

    Show that ballotbox is empty

    Transparent plastic

    Turn on andinitialize PCOS

    Print Zero ReportTo show that there is

    no entry/vote inmachines memory

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    15/36

    Counting

    At close of polls Perform close

    function

    To preventadditional ballotsfrom being inserted

    After close function,

    PCOS automatically Starts countingprocess

    Prints electionreturns after

    completion of

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    16/36

    Counting

    Insert transmission cable

    After printing first eight (8) copies ofER

    To eliminate doubts that the PCOS can bemanipulated remotely

    Perform electronic transmission

    function Print additional twenty-two (22)

    copies of ER

    Automatically performed by PCOS

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    17/36

    Canvassing/Consolidation

    Electronically transmitted results Used as basis for canvassing/consolidation

    and proclamation of winning candidates for City/municipal officials

    Provincial officials

    Members, House of Representatives

    Senators and Party-list

    Congress will also receive electronicallytransmitted results Constitution authorized the Congress to

    promulgate rules for canvassing of results forPresident and Vice-President

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    18/36

    Munici pa l/C ityBoa rd ofCanvassers

    Provin ci alBoa rd ofCanvassers

    Na tion alBoa rd ofCanvassers

    Co ng re ss CO MELEC

    Precin ctEle ct ion Re tu rn s

    Mun./City COCSOVP

    Pro v. CO CSOVM/C

    Physicaltransport

    Physicaltransport

    Physical

    transport

    Manual

    System ofCanvassing

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    19/36

    Munici pa l/C ityBoa rd ofCanvassers

    Provin ci alBoa rd ofCanvassers

    Na tion alBoa rd ofCanvassers

    Co ng re ss CO MELEC

    Precin ct

    Physicaltransport

    Physicaltransport

    Physical

    transport

    Electronic

    Transmission

    Come le c Cen tra lBa ck-up Serve rAdv ance Resu lts /Monito ring

    Server forDomi nantMajori ty/ Min orit yParties, CitizensArm, KBPAdv ance Resu lts

    Secur edPublicWebsite

    Ele ct ion Re tu rn s

    Mun./City COCSOVP

    Pro v. CO CSOVM/C

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    20/36

    SECURITY

    Security measures under a manualelection system still applicable

    Strengthen security throughautomation

    Password

    PIN

    Digital signatures

    Encryption

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    21/36

    SECURITY

    128-bitencryption 2

    2 = 4

    2 = 8

    2 = 16

    2 = 32 2 = 64

    2 = 128

    2 = 256

    128

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    2 = 512

    2 = 1024

    2 = 2048

    2 = 4096

    2 = 8192 2 = 16,384

    2 = 32,768

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    2 =

    65,536 2 =

    131,072

    2 =

    262,144 2 =

    524,288

    2 =

    1,048,576

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    22/36

    SECURITY

    128-bit encryption

    2 =

    8,388,608 2 =

    16,777,216

    2 =

    33,554,432 2 =

    67,108,864

    2 =

    134,217,728

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    29

    2 =

    1,073,741,824 2 =

    2,147,483,648

    2 =

    4,294,967,296 2 =

    8,569,934,592

    2 =

    17,179,869,184

    30

    31

    32

    33

    34

    35

    36

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    23/36

    SECURITY

    128-bit encryption

    2 = 137,438,953,472

    2 = 274,877,906,944

    2 = 549,755,813,888

    2 = over One Trillion combinations

    37

    38

    39

    40

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    24/36

    SECURITY

    128-bit encryption

    Same security system used by banks

    Random Encryption

    Temperature of machine

    Voltage

    Unique machine identity

    User identity

    No single/master decryption code

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    25/36

    SECURITY

    Time needed to decrypt one precinctresult will be same amount of timeneeded to decrypt next precinct result

    Transmission takes at most 2 minutes

    Copies for distribution

    30 copies of election returns at the precinct

    level 30 copies of certificate of canvass at

    municipal level

    14 copies of certificate of canvass at

    provincial level

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    26/36

    SECURITY

    Audit Log

    Activities

    Time

    Date

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    27/36

    SECURITY

    Paper Ballot

    Ballot digital image

    Data storage device Transmitted results

    Hard copies of election results

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    28/36

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    29/36

    CONTINUITY PLAN

    Types of Systems Breakdown

    Fails to scan

    Able to scan but fails to print ER

    Able to print ER but fails to transmit

    Able to transmit but fails to consolidate

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    30/36

    CONTINUITY PLAN

    Fails to scan

    Use spare PCOS

    Use PCOS of another precinct

    Wait for other PCOS to complete process inits precinct

    Get PCOS and reconfigure for next precinct

    Scan ballots

    If all PCOS fails

    Manual counting

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    31/36

    CONTINUITY PLAN

    Able to scan but fails to print ER

    Use spare PCOS

    Use PCOS of another precinct

    Wait for other PCOS to complete process inits precinct

    Get PCOS and reconfigure for next precinct

    Use removable storage device of defective

    PCOS and let replacement PCOS print ER

    If all PCOS fails

    Manual counting

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    32/36

    CONTINUITY PLAN

    Able to print ER but fails to transmit

    Go to nearest precinct or polling centerwhich has a functioning transmission

    facility Use removable storage device of defective

    PCOS and let the functioning facilitytransmit precinct results

    If all transmission facilities bog down

    Physically transport removable storagedevice to canvassing site

    In the presence of watchers and security escorts

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    33/36

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    34/36

    Basic Elements of Elections

    People Vote-buying

    Coercion

    Intimidation

    Terrorism

    Systems &Procedures Misreading of

    ballots

    Unreadablehandwriting

    Error Honest

    Deliberate Fraud

    Manufacturedelection returns

    Tampering ofelection results

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    35/36

    Successful Implementation

    Vigilance of citizenry

    Cooperation

    Coordination Support

  • 8/14/2019 2010 Election Automation Scenario

    36/36

    THANK YOU!