Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I Theo van de Ven / IATA

Safety, Operations & Infrastructure Europe

2010 AVIONICS SURVEY Available and Planned

Aircraft Capabilities

and

Gaps

IATA SAFETY, OPERATIONS & INFRASTRUCTURE

Safety

Security and facilitation

Flight operations and maintenance

Infrastructure and airports

Consulting

Regionally organized

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

218 Airline Fleets (> 6000 aircraft)

Africa 10%

Asia-Pacific 12%

China and North Asia

3%

Europe 41%

Latin America and The

Caribbean 7%

Middle East and North

Africa 7%

North America

10%

Russia and CIS

Countries 10%

Airline Response by Region

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

EUR traffic forecast (modest)

Average traffic growth: 2.8 % / yr

2001: 7.5 Million IFR movements

2009: 9.4 Million

2020: 12.7 Million

2030: 16.9 Million

2009 – 2020 traffic multiplier: 1.4

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

Towards 4D Business Trajectories

Need for a harmonized PBN implementation plan to cope with

future traffic demand

Homogeneous Traffic and Airspace environment

Based on minimum system requirements

at low costs

and optimum benefits

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

IATA/AEA JURG POSITION

Message from the users:

“Airlines express the urgent need to use

the actually onboard RNAV / RNP

capabilities in the transition period

towards a full 4D business trajectory

environment and therefore airlines do

not want to see a standstill in PBN

procedure development and

implementation until the time a PBN IR

becomes available”.

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

Avionic Survey Results

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

GBAS

LPV S

BAS

Enha

nced

Vision Sys

tems EV

S

Hea

d-Up

Display

HUD

FANS 1

A H

FDL

FABS 1

A V

DL M2

Elec

tron

ic F

light

Bag

FMS W

PR

ATN

VDL Mod

e 2

FANS 1

A S

atCom

RNP AR A

ppro

ach

Fixe

d Rad

ius Tr

ansition

- FRT

FANS 1

A A

CARS

APV

Bar

o VNAV

ARIN

C 6

23

Req

uire

d Tim

e of

Arrival - R

TA

RNP App

roac

h LNAV

Fixe

d Rad

ius Tu

rn, RF

ADS-b

Out

MMR

GNSS

ACARS

RNAV1 / PR

NAV

RNAV 10

ADS C

DME

DME

Upd

ate

INS IRS

Aut

othru

st

8.33

kHz VHF

Aut

opilo

t Flight

Direc

tor VNAV

RNAV 5

Mod

e S

EFIS

Aut

opilo

t Flight

Direc

tor LN

AV

FMS

Capability

Deg

ree o

f eq

uip

pag

e

Not Availble

Planned

Available

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

Aircraft PBN capabilities & requirements Actual

√ FMS; INS / IRS (98%; 85%)

√ AP/FD coupling with LNAV/VNAV (97% / 91%)

X GNSS receivers (68%) ↑

X RNAV1 (73%) ↑

X APV/Baro-VNAV (30%) ↑

X RNP APCH LNAV (multiple accuracies 1 → 0.3) (39%) ↑

X RF (TMA) ; FRT (En route) (43%) ↑; (24%) ↑

NAV Specification on its own does not guaranty any benefit

requires :

Agreed lateral separation standard – 3 NM possible

Availability of airspace based on PBN procedure design

For En Route, TMA and Approach

Availability of Operational approval and Airworthiness process

SUR and COM mandated improvements

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

Yes 66%

No 33%

Planned 1%

GNSS

• GNSS is the ideal radio navigation aid to allow

full exploitation of the global benefits to be

gained from RNAV and RNP

• GPS (USA) is the only fully operational GNSS

• GLONASS (Russia) and Galileo (Europe) soon

in operation

• COMPASS (China) and IRNSS (India)

IATA’s Position:

Support GNSS as the primary radio

navigation aid for positioning and timing for

all phases of flight

GNSS

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

Yes 93%

No 7%

Planned 0%

RNAV 5

• Mandated for aircraft by 1998

• Aircraft coverage 93 %

was aligned with

• En route airspace redesign 1998

• Separation 16.5 – 18 NM

• Successful implementation

RNAV 5 - BRNAV

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

Yes 73%

No 21%

Planned 6%

RNAV1 / PRNAV

• Requested by IATA since 2000

• Voluntarily installed by airlines

• 2010 aircraft coverage 73 %

but NOT aligned with

• Airspace redesign by EUR States

• Only in a few TMAs to date

• Lateral separation 5-8 NM

• Lost opportunity

RNAV 1

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

• Coverage: 39%

• RNP multiple accuracies 1 0.3

• Small RNP values in dense TMA’s

• increases terminal capacity

• allows for optimal rwy usage

• Large RNP values further away

from the airport (SIDs/STARs)

• Multiple accuracies through the

Nav. Database

• No manual entries

RNP APCH LNAV

Yes 39%

No 54%

Planned 7%

RNP Approach LNAV

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

Yes 43%

No 56%

Planned 1%

Fixed Radius Turn - RF RADIUS TO FIX (RF) TMA

• Flying accurate robust tracks

• Increases path predictability

• Improves VNAV path stability for

optimum CDO and CCO

• Potential environmental advantage

• Noise concentration possible

Implement RF functionality into RNP

APCH rather than only for RNP AR

APCH to facilitate the publication of

cost effective and efficient procedures

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

AMS RW24 conventional coding

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

AMS RW24 use of RF leg for noise

abatement purposes

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

Yes 24%

No 74%

Planned 2%

Fixed Radius Transition - FRT FIXED RADIUS TRANSITION (FRT)

En Route airspace

• Closely spaced parallel routes

also during turns

• Increases horizontal capacity

• Refinement / rationalization en-route

network possible

• Shortens the routes

• Reduces fuel and CO2 emissions

• Aligned with SUR & COM mandate

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

Yes 39%

No 61%

Planned 0%

Required Time of Arrival - RTA

• Enables predictability of

of aircraft arriving at a

specific point (time sequencing)

• Efficient sequencing and

merging

• Future ATM Master Plan

requirement to enable 4D

business trajectories

Required Time of Arrival

Conclusions:

There are gaps to be filled

Need for a coherent implementation plan

With a maximum use of available systems

Through a step by step process

With benefits at each step

We all have a role to play

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

Brussels, 30 May – 1 Jun 2011 JURG50 IATA / AEA CNS CONFERENCE

IATA BRU SO&I

Standardization & Interoperability

is a MUST ICAO

European Commission EASA State Aviation Organisations

Civil / Military Airspace Users

Service providers Airports

Aerospace industry Standardisation-Bodies

R&D organisations

We all have a role to play