2010. 6 Do-Hee Ahn The Korean Strategy for Nuclear Fuel Cycle.
-
Upload
claire-matthews -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of 2010. 6 Do-Hee Ahn The Korean Strategy for Nuclear Fuel Cycle.
2010. 6
Do-Hee AhnDo-Hee Ahn
The Korean Strategy for Nuclear
Fuel Cycle
The Korean Strategy for Nuclear
Fuel Cycle
Table of ContentsTable of Contents
2
Ⅰ
Ⅱ
III
Spent Fuel Management
Recent Pyroprocessing Research Activity
Summary
II-1. Electrolytic ReductionII-2. ElectrorefiningII-3. ElectrowinningII-4. Waste Salt Treatment
Spent Nuclear FuelSpent Nuclear FuelSpent Nuclear FuelSpent Nuclear Fuel
3
AttributeAttribute
High radioactivity and heat : emits about 12 kW/ton after 1 yr coolingHigh radioactivity and heat : emits about 12 kW/ton after 1 yr cooling
High radiotoxicity : 300,000 yrs will be taken to be natural uranium level High radiotoxicity : 300,000 yrs will be taken to be natural uranium level
Energy resource : contains 1% Pu and 93% UraniumEnergy resource : contains 1% Pu and 93% Uranium
Annual Spent Fuel Generation 700t/yr
CANDUCANDU PWRPWR
Projection of Spent Fuel Generation
20 t/yr, unit 16 units 320 t/yr
95 t/yr,unit 4 units 380 t/yr 11,500 톤 /년700 톤 /년
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075 2085 2095
Year
Ac
cum
ula
ted
SF
Ari
sin
gs
(ktH
M)
PWR
CANDU
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075 2085 2095
Year
Ac
cum
ula
ted
SF
Ari
sin
gs
(ktH
M)
PWR
CANDUS
pen
t F
uel
Acc
um
ula
tio
n (
ktH
M)
10,0761 t, 2009
Status of Spent Fuel StorageStatus of Spent Fuel StorageStatus of Spent Fuel StorageStatus of Spent Fuel Storage
4
NPPSites
Kori
Yonggwang
Ulchin
Wolsong
Total
Storage Capacity(MTU)
2,253
2,686
1,642
5,980
12,561
CumulativeAmount(MTU)
1,762
1,704
1,401
5,894
10,761
Year of Saturation
2016
2016
2008
2009
As of end of 2009
Storage Capacity(MTU)
2,253
3,528
2,326
9,155
17,262
Year of Saturation
Expansion Plan
2016
2021
2018
2017
On-site SF storage limit will be reached from 2016On-site SF storage limit will be reached from 2016
Decision making process for interim SF storageDecision making process for interim SF storage
Korean, Innovative, Environment-Friendly, and Proliferation-Resistant System for the 21st C (KIEP-21)
Benefits Saves disposal space by a factor of 100
Shortens the management period to a fewhundred years
Increases U utilization by a factor of 100
Ensures intrinsic proliferation resistance
Promising Fuel Cycle Concept (KIEP-21)Promising Fuel Cycle Concept (KIEP-21)Promising Fuel Cycle Concept (KIEP-21)Promising Fuel Cycle Concept (KIEP-21)
FR Closed Fuel Cycle Volume Reduction
GEN-IVFR(SFR)
PWR
CANDU
FR Metal Fuel(U-TRU-Zr)
(Cs, Sr)Decay Storage
DisposalDisposal
S/G
IHTS Piping
Secondary EM Pump
Reactor Core
Primary Pump
Reactor Vessel
IHX
DHX
Reactor Head
Containment Vessel
S/G
IHTS Piping
Secondary EM Pump
Reactor Core
Primary Pump
Reactor Vessel
IHX
DHX
Reactor Head
Containment Vessel
Recycling
Wastes
Pyroprocess
Dupic
Flow Diagram of Pyroprocessing (KAERI)Flow Diagram of Pyroprocessing (KAERI)Flow Diagram of Pyroprocessing (KAERI)Flow Diagram of Pyroprocessing (KAERI)
6
TRU fuelfabrication
Decladding & Voloxidation Electrolyticreduction Electrorefining
Electrowinning
Molten saltwaste treatment
Uraniumrecovery
Recycleor LLW
Recycleor treatment
Cladding material
Low level waste
Off-gastreatment
Sodium-cooledfast reactor
Fission gas
Air
U3O8+(TRU+FP)oxide
(U+TRU+FP)metal
PWR spent fuel
TRU : Transuranic elementsNM : Noble metal elementsFP : Fission products
TRU fuelfabrication
Decladding & Voloxidation Electrolyticreduction Electrorefining
Electrowinning
Molten saltwaste treatment
Uraniumrecovery
Recycleor LLW
Recycleor treatment
Cladding material
Low level waste
Off-gastreatment
Sodium-cooledfast reactor
Fission gas
Air
U3O8+(TRU+FP)oxide
(U+TRU+FP)metal
PWR spent fuel
TRU : Transuranic elementsNM : Noble metal elementsFP : Fission products
R&D Issues of PyroprocessingR&D Issues of PyroprocessingR&D Issues of PyroprocessingR&D Issues of Pyroprocessing
7
Purposes Increase throughput Simple and easy remote operability Enhance interconnection between unit processes Reduce waste volume
Improvement High performance electrolytic reduction process Graphite cathode employment to recover U in electrorefining system Application of residual actinides recovery (RAR) system Crystallization method applied to recover pure salt from waste mixture
Spent Fuel Voloxidation Electroreduction Electrorefinning Electrowining Fuel Fabrication SFR
HM
Electrolytic Reduction Process – Flow DiagramElectrolytic Reduction Process – Flow Diagram
Pre-treatment
Electrolytic Reducer(650 oC, 120 kW)
Electro-refining
Waste Salt Treatment
Cathode Processor(725 oC, 120 kW)
UO2
MS + Cs, SrMS: LiCl-Li2O molten salt
Metal U
Metal U+ MS + Cs, Sr
LiCl
Electrode Handling Apparatuses
8
Development of Electrolytic Reduction ProcessDevelopment of Electrolytic Reduction Process
Bench Scale ER(~g UO2/batch)
Lab. Scale ER(~20 kg UO2/batch)
Eng. Scale ER(~50 kg UO2/batch)
Year 2008→ Change of Ceramic Cathode Basket to Metal Cathode Basket
Year 2009→ Successful Demonstration of Lab-scale Electrolytic Reducer
Year 2010→ Construction of Eng-scale ER focusing on the High Speed Reduction
9
Electrorefining System – Flow Diagram Electrorefining System – Flow Diagram
CERS (Continuous Electrorefining System)CERS (Continuous Electrorefining System)
Continuous electrorefinerContinuous
electrorefiner
Continuous recovery
Continuous recovery
Uranium depositUranium deposit Uranium depositUranium deposit
Salt recycleSalt recycle
Salt distillerSalt distiller
Melting furnaceMelting furnace
Electro-reducer
UCl3UCl3
U chlorinatorU chlorinator
Impure U mixtureImpure U mixture
ElectrowinnerResidual saltResidual salt
22.5 kg UCl3/batch
Height: 2 m
OD: 0.9 m
50 kg U/day
Height: 2.3 m
OD: 1.2 m
71.43 kg U-deposit/batch
Height: 2.7 m
OD: 0.9 m
50 kg U/day
Height: 2.7 m
OD: 4.9 m
10
Development of Electrorefining ProcessDevelopment of Electrorefining Process
HTER Design (~20 kg U/batch)
HTER Construction/Test(~20 kg U/day)
Eng.-Scale HTER(~50 kg U/day)
Year 2008→ Lab. Scale HTER Design Electrohydrodynamic Anal. Cu-recovery Test
Year 2009→ Construction of Electrorefiner Design of Eng. Scale Melting Furn.
Year 2010→ Construction of Eng.-scale HTER System
Double layer cathode
167
mm
167
mm
Outer layer
Inner layer
Back side ofouter layer
Double layer cathode module
11
Electrowinning Process – Flow DiagramElectrowinning Process – Flow Diagram
Cd
TRU/U/RE/Cd- HM>10wt%- RE/TRU<0.25
Saltpurification RE
Salt from electrorefiner
RE/Salt(TRU<100ppm)
MetalFuel
FuelFabrication
TRUProduct
TRU/U/RE/Salt- Pu/U>3.0
RE/TRU/Salt
Cleaned saltTo electrorefiner
TRU/U/RE(Cd<50ppm)
Salt To electrorefiner
Cd-TRUDistillation
Residual ActinideRecovery
LCCElectrowinning
12
LCC assembly tests 8.4wt% U/Cd deposition by mesh-type LCC assembly (manual operation) Set-up of mesh-type LCC assembly to be installed in PRIDE (pneumatic operation)
LCC assembly tests 8.4wt% U/Cd deposition by mesh-type LCC assembly (manual operation) Set-up of mesh-type LCC assembly to be installed in PRIDE (pneumatic operation)
(a) paddle
(b) harrow
Fig. LCC deposition results using Paddle and Harrow (U dendrite growth at salt-Cd interface)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8-1.65
-1.60
-1.55
-1.50
-1.45
-1.40
-1.35
Vo
ltag
e(V
. vs
. A
g/L
iCl-
KC
l-1
% A
gC
l)
Passed Electric Charge(Ah)
0rpm 100rpm-paddle 200rpm-harrow
50 mA/cm2
U solubility in Cd
[ 5 wt%U/Cd )
Paddle Harrow
[Mesh]
Fig. LCC deposition result using Mesh(No U dendrite growth at salt-Cd interface)
Clean Cd surface
U deposits
0 2 4 6 8 10-2.3
-2.2
-2.1
-2.0
-1.9
-1.8
-1.7
-1.6
-1.5
C
ath
od
e V
olta
ge
(V.
vs.
Ag
/LiC
l-K
Cl-
1%
Ag
Cl)
Passed Electric Charge (Ah)
100 mA/cm2
U solubility in Cd
[ 8.4 wt%U/Cd )
Mesh-type LCC by pneumatic operation
Development of Lab-scale LCC ElectrowinnersDevelopment of Lab-scale LCC Electrowinners
13
Development of Drawdown(RAR) SystemDevelopment of Drawdown(RAR) System
Target concentration of residual actinides in a spent LiCl-KCl salt : < 0.01 wt% (100 ppm)
(1) Recovery of Ans & REs by LCC electrolysis (2) Oxidation of parts of codeposited REs using CdCl2
Features & Progress of RAR Study:
- Same equipment using a LCC electrowinning can be used for a RAR operation.
- RAR process has merits such as a compact equipment and a simple process application compared to a
counter current multi-staged reductive extraction.
- Experimental results show that the residual concentration of uranium can be reduced to a value of less than
100 ppm.
- Design of PRIDE-RAR equipment: 50 kg-salt/10 kg-LCC capacity & remote operation by MSM
[LCC Assembly]
[EW&RAR Reactor]
[Electrorefining & Electrowinning Schematic]
2Ce(-U-Cd) + 3CdCl2 2CeCl3 + 3Cd + 2(-U-Cd)
CdCl2CeCl3
Time intervals
Time intervals
Timeintervals
Timeintervals
(Interval: 30 mins)
14
Computational Model for LCC ElectrowinnerComputational Model for LCC Electrowinner
Simplified model development Half cell one-step reduction reaction:
An3+ + 3e- Ano
Electro-transport is controlled by reduction potential and activation polarization (Butler-Volmer kinetics)
Diffusion limited mass transfer at LiCl-KCl/Cd interface
- Linear concentration gradient at diffusion boundary layer:
Electric field analysis Overall cell voltage drop
CFD based model approach
Cdc
Cdbi
CdsiCd
iiSaltc
saltsi
saltbisalt
iii
CCFDn
CCFDni
,,,,
0 200 400 600 8000
2
4
6
8
10
12
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0Applied current denisity: 10mA/cm2
(i0=0.1mA/cm2 )
U Np Pu Am La Ce Pr Nd Gd Y
Cu
rre
nt
de
nsi
ty (
A/c
m2 )
Deposition time (hours)
Cathode potential
Ca
tho
de
po
ten
tial(
V v
s. A
g/A
gC
l)
00.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
Applied current denisity: 10mA/cm2
(i0=0.1mA/cm2 )
U Np Pu Am La Ce Pr Nd Gd Y
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n in
LC
C(m
ol/c
m3 )
Deposition time (hours)
Cathode potential
C
ath
od
e p
ote
ntia
l(V
vs.
Ag
/Ag
Cl)
Partial current behavior of multi component simulation
(Iapp=10 mA/cm2)
Diffusion controlled electro-transport model
Deposition behavior of multi component simulation
(Iapp=10 mA/cm2)
Electric field pattern & current stream in molten-salt
region (Iapp=10 mA/cm2)
CathodeAnodeohmCell EE
LCC
Cathode
15
Waste Salt Treatment – Flow DiagramWaste Salt Treatment – Flow Diagram
Electrorefining (Drawdown)Electrorefining (Drawdown)
PWR Spent Fuel
VoloxidationU, TRU, FPs U, TRU, FPs
(Oxides)(Oxides)
LiCl Waste (Sr/Cs)
LiCl Recycle
U, TRU, FPs U, TRU, FPs
(Metal)(Metal)
LiCl-KCl Recycle
RE Oxides
LiCl+KCl Waste (RE)
RE : Oxidation
Residual SaltCs & Sr/Ba
Disposal
Solidifying Solidifying Agent Agent High-integrity
Solidification
Waste Salt
minimization(FPs Removal &
Salt Recycle)
<Waste from unit process><Waste from unit process>
Electrolytic ReductionElectrolytic Reduction
Cs/Sr : Salt refining (Crystallization)
Distillation &Condensation
UU
TRUTRU
FinalWasteForm I
FinalWasteForm II
SolidificationSolidification
Characterizationof Waste FormsCharacterizationof Waste Forms
Solidifying Solidifying Agent Agent
16
Waste salt minimizationWaste salt minimization
Lab-scale LiCl waste salt treatmentLab-scale LiCl waste salt treatment
Salt crystal
Crystallization Melting of crystal
▶ Reuse of LiCl waste salt by separation (or
concentration) of Cs/Sr/Ba using layer
crystallization process
▶ About 85-90 % LiCl salt reuse rate
→ 85-90 % FPs separation efficiency
Lab-scale eutectic salt treatmentLab-scale eutectic salt treatment
▶ Oxidative precipitation : separation of RE FPs by oxygen sparing process (←1st pure salt recovery)
▶ Vacuum dis./cond. : distillation /condensation of residual salt from precipitation phase(← 2nd pure salt recovery)
▶Total eutectic salt reuse rate : > 97%
Oxidative precipitationOxidative precipitation
Vacuum distillation/condensationVacuum distillation/condensation
Pure salt phase
Precipitation phase
Condensed Pure salt
Remaining RE oxides
Wasteform Fabrication of Residual WasteWasteform Fabrication of Residual Waste
Lab-scale wasteform fabricationLab-scale wasteform fabrication Eng.-scale waste salt treatment apparatusEng.-scale waste salt treatment apparatus
SAP wasteform
(FPs concentrated
LiCl)
ZIT wasteform
(RE oxides)
Waste loading ~25wt% 25wt%~
Durability
(g/m2day)
wasteform: ~10-2
Cs/Sr: ~10-3
Wasteform: ~10-3
REE: ~10-6
Density
(g/cm3)~2.4 ~4.3
Remark
~1/3 volume reduction
*Compared with zeolite method
Low temperature
processing & high waste
loading
(~1100℃)
Wasteform fabrication
20kg-waste/2 weeks
80kg-waste form
W2.0 X H2.5 X L5.0m
Distillation/condensation
8kg/batch
W2.0 X H2 X L1.5m
Process Layout in PRIDEProcess Layout in PRIDE
19
SummarySummary
Based on the national long-term R&D program, the pyroprocessing technology will be developed to achieve the milestones.
Research activities on lab-scale unit processes will be kept on in terms of throughput, remote operability, process optimization, waste minimization, and so on.
20 kg/batch scale experiments have been successfully conducted.
Eng. scale unit processes have been designed based on the lab-scale research activity. An inactive engineering-scale integrated pyroprocess (PRIDE) facility with a capacity of 10 tons-U per year is planned to be constructed by the end of 2011.
PRIDE should be open for international collaboration. KAERI welcomes collaboration for development of pyroprocessing technology.
Based on the national long-term R&D program, the pyroprocessing technology will be developed to achieve the milestones.
Research activities on lab-scale unit processes will be kept on in terms of throughput, remote operability, process optimization, waste minimization, and so on.
20 kg/batch scale experiments have been successfully conducted.
Eng. scale unit processes have been designed based on the lab-scale research activity. An inactive engineering-scale integrated pyroprocess (PRIDE) facility with a capacity of 10 tons-U per year is planned to be constructed by the end of 2011.
PRIDE should be open for international collaboration. KAERI welcomes collaboration for development of pyroprocessing technology.
20