2010-2011

20
2010- 2011 Greenville ISD 3504 King St/P.O. Box 1022 Greenville, Texas 75403 www.greenvilleisd.org Greenville Independent School District GISD We Educate Today… You Succeed Tomorrow

description

2010-2011. Greenville ISD 3504 King St/P.O. Box 1022 Greenville, Texas 75403 www.greenvilleisd.org. GISD We Educate Today… You Succeed Tomorrow. Greenville Independent School District. Tonight’s Agenda. Special Session Update. Process of Bill becoming Law. Behind the Numbers. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of 2010-2011

Page 1: 2010-2011

2010-2011

Greenville ISD3504 King St/P.O. Box 1022Greenville, Texas 75403www.greenvilleisd.org

Greenville Independent School District

GISDWe Educate Today…

You Succeed Tomorrow

Page 2: 2010-2011

Tonight’s Agenda

• Special Session Update

• School Finance

Page 3: 2010-2011

Special Session UpdateSB 1 – School Finance Bill – approved by House, in Senate Conference Committee

SB 1 – RPAF, Proration, Amendments

SB 2 – State Appropriations Bill – approved by House, in Senate Conference Committee

SB 2 – Rainy Day Fund Amendment

Page 4: 2010-2011

Process of Bill becoming LawIntroduction of Bill on Floor

• First Reading• Assigned to Committee

Bill in Committee• Discussed and approved/not approved/no action• Recommended back to Floor for debate

Bill to Floor for Debate• Receives 2nd Reading, amendments may be added• If majority approves, receives 3rd Reading and

voted on

Bill Sent to Other Chamber• Follows similar process• If amended further, Conference Committee is

formed

Page 5: 2010-2011

Behind the Numbers“Proration” is not a cut, but rather a delay of payment (settle up payment) – OR IT USED TO BE…..

“Hybrid Model” does nothing to address Target Revenue – essentially lowers everyone

“Regular Program Adjustment Factor” will be set in appropriations process – NOT – in framework of statute

Will force HIGHER Tax Rates – Except – for those districts already at maximum have no way of recouping loss

Page 6: 2010-2011

Senate Bill 1 – School Finance BillRep. Patrick

AmendmentsRegular Program Adjustment Factor (RPAF) – Sunsets the RPAF language after the 2012-2013 biennium. Requires future changes to be set by statute rather than, an appropriations committee.Proration Language – Reinstates current law proration language after the 2012-2013 biennium. Requires legislature to fulfill funding obligations in next biennium if shortfall in current biennium exists.

Page 7: 2010-2011

Results if Amendments Repealed• RESULT• Texas ISD’s future funding

will be set by an appropriations committee rather than by statute.

RPAF Amendme

nt Repealed

• RESULT• Will set the precedent of

under-funding school districts for the foreseeable future.

Proration Amendm

ent Repealed

Page 8: 2010-2011

Process of Bill to LawIntroduction of Bill on Floor• First Reading• Assigned to Committee

Bill in Committee• Discussed and approved/not approved/no action• Recommended back to Floor for debate

Bill to Floor for Debate• Receives 2nd Reading, amendments may be added• If majority approves, receives 3rd Reading and

voted on

Bill Sent to Other Chamber• Follows similar process• If amended further, Conference Committee is

formed

Page 9: 2010-2011

Formula v. Target RevenueTa

rget

Rev

enue

Targ

et R

even

ue

“TR” District

“Formula” District

Page 10: 2010-2011

Formula v. Target RevenueTa

rget

Rev

enue

Targ

et R

even

ue

“TR” District

“Formula” District

Formula Formula

Page 11: 2010-2011

Formula v. Target RevenueTa

rget

Rev

enue

Targ

et R

even

ue

“TR” District

“Formula” District

Formula Formula

ASATR

Page 12: 2010-2011

Formula v. Target RevenueTa

rget

Rev

enue

Targ

et R

even

ue

Collin Co. ISDsAvg. TR = $5,371

Hunt Co. ISDsAvg. TR = $4,600

ASATR

Formula Formula

$771 difference

Page 13: 2010-2011

HB 1/SB 1 (SB 1811)

ModelDescription

Regular Program Allotment 92.39% 98.00%

Target Revenue % Retained 100.00% 92.35%

Loss in FSP to GISD 1,706,058$ 794,078$

Loss over Biennium (2,500,136)$

FY 2012

Rep. Eissler "Proration"

FY 2013

Sen. Shapiro "Hybrid Model"

Source: Legislative Budget Board

Page 14: 2010-2011

Is Public Ed Getting More $ ??

Certain Legislato

rsYES

ActuallyNO

Page 15: 2010-2011

WADA What ?? What is

WADA?

Weighted Average

Daily Attendance What is

WADA used for?

Used to calculate Tier

2 Funding

How is WADA calculated?

Tier 1 ÷ BA = WADA

Page 16: 2010-2011

Is Public Ed Getting More $ ??

Total Revenue$31,567,

447

$29,861,206

WADA

6,010

5,682

Revenue per

WADA$5,253

$5,255

How is WADA calculated?

Tier 1 ÷ BA = WADA

Page 17: 2010-2011

Is Public Ed Getting More $ ??

YES NO

Lower Total Revenue

Lower WADA

Lower Reg. Prgm. Allot.

Revenue per WADA

Page 18: 2010-2011

Senate Bill 2 – Appropriations Bill

Rep. Howard-Farrar Amendment

Rainy Day Fund – Proposal would allocate any excess realized in 2012-2013 biennium over $6.5 Billion back to the FSP. Projections estimate could be as much as $2.5 Billion.

Page 19: 2010-2011

Process of Bill to LawIntroduction of Bill on Floor• First Reading• Assigned to Committee

Bill in Committee• Discussed and approved/not approved/no action• Recommended back to Floor for debate

Bill to Floor for Debate• Receives 2nd Reading, amendments may be added• If majority approves, receives 3rd Reading and

voted on

Bill Sent to Other Chamber• Follows similar process• If amended further, Conference Committee is

formed

Page 20: 2010-2011

QUESTIONS FROM BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Greenville Independent School District prepares, inspires, and empowers students in a safe and nurturing environment to become responsible citizens who successfully compete in a global society.

GISD Mission Statement