Formative Assessment Every Learner. Every Day. Utilizing the MSDE Formative Assessment Tasks.
2010 05 04 SIG invited symposium UTILIZING ASSESSMENT INFORMATION FOR (IN)FORMATIVE FEEDBACK.
-
Upload
ayanna-kessell -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of 2010 05 04 SIG invited symposium UTILIZING ASSESSMENT INFORMATION FOR (IN)FORMATIVE FEEDBACK.
2010 05 04
SIG invited symposium
UTILIZING ASSESSMENT
INFORMATION FOR (IN)FORMATIVE
FEEDBACK
2010 05 04
STUDENTS’ USE OF FEEDBACK IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Anders JönssonMalmö University
Sweden
2010 05 04
BACKGROUND
Feedback holds a great potential for learning
Still, some students do not use the feedback they receive
Why?
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
2010 05 04
PREVIOUS RESEARCH
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
• Students did not act on their feedback, although they did value to receive it (Brown & Glover, 2006)
• Students do not use assessment information to improve their learning (Mclellan, 2001).
• Less than half of the students collected their formative feedback (Sinclair & Cleland, 2007)
• Students seldom read their teachers comments and those who did read them, did not use them (MacDonalds, 1991)
2010 05 04
PREVIOUS RESEARCH• Students did not act on their
feedback, although they did value to receive it (Brown & Glover, 2006)
• Students do not use assessment information to improve their learning (Mclellan, 2001).
• Less than half of the students collected their formative feedback (Sinclair & Cleland, 2007)
• Students seldom read their teachers comments and those who did read them, did not use them (MacDonalds, 1991)
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
• Students are not very happy about their feedback (e.g. Rust, 2002; Scott, 2005).
• Teacher feedback is not homogenous (e.g. Connors & Lunsford, 1993).
2010 05 04
PROCEDURE
Literature review
1. Broad search for recent (2009-2010)
papers on feedback in higher education in
several databases
(27 studies)
2. Inclusion criteria•Empirical research•Higher education•Printed and peer-reviewed work•Time limit 1990•Feedback from teachers/tutors•Not error correction in ESL
3. ”Snowballing”
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
2010 05 04
DATA
In total: 103 studies
Majority of studies published in journals,
followed by edited books.
Studies vary across subjects (Humanities,
Technology, Business)
Almost exclusively written comments on
students’ written work (although a growing
number of digital-audio feedback)
Research designs mostly questionnaires
and/or interviews – almost no studies on
students’ use of feedback in vivo
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
2010 05 04
RESULTS
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
A large number of different factors may influence students’ use of feedback:
Students’ perceptions of the teacher
(e.g. credibility, scariness)
The content of the feedback
(e.g. focus on form or ideas)
The actual message
(e.g. positive or negative)
The mode of delivery
(e.g. written or oral)
The context
(e.g. with or withour grading)
Timing
…
2010 05 04
RESULTS
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
2010 05 04
The feedback is given along
with a grade/mark
RESULTS
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
Teachers are not educated to give feedback
The feedback is not given within the course or module of interest
The feedback makes no
reference to the
assessment criteria
The feedback is mainly
summative
The students have no
strategies for using their feedback
The feedback contains
expressions of power and
authority
2010 05 04
Why do students not use their feedback?
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
The information is not useful
Students’ use their feedback if they are
asked to:
1.Revise a task and hand it in again
2.Make use of their feedback in similar
assignments
COMMON OBSTACLES:
No in-built features for using feedback
(i.e. it is up to the students themselves)
The students do not receive their feedback
until the course/module is over
The feedback is on the ”wrong level”
(e.g. task-level feedback on non-revision
tasks)
2010 05 04
Why do students not use their feedback?
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
The feedback should be comprehensive, specific, detailed, and personal
Students prefer:
1.A lot of feedback
2.Specific, detailed, and personal feedback
3.Positive feedback (some even like to be
praised)
4.Feedback accompanied by a grade or a
mark
BUT:
The amount of feedback does not
necessarily affect how students use their
feedback. However, important issues may
be missed at the expense of more
common issues.
The students may make more changes if
told exactly what to do, but the results are
not always for the better.
Positive feedback often lead to less
changes.
Grades seem to make the students less
willing to challenge the teachers’ feedback
and also to focus on smaller (and safer)
changes.
2010 05 04
Why do students not use their feedback?
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
The feedback should be comprehensive, specific, detailed, and personal – OR NOT!
Students prefer:
1.A lot of feedback
2.Specific, detailed, and personal feedback
3.Positive feedback (some even like to be
praised)
4.Feedback accompanied by a grade or a
mark
BUT:
The amount of feedback does not
necessarily affect how students use their
feedback. However, important issues may
be missed at the expense of more
common issues.
The students may make more changes if
told exactly what to do, but the results are
not always for the better.
Positive feedback often lead to less
changes.
Grades seem to make the students less
willing to challenge the teachers’ feedback
and also to focus on smaller (and safer)
changes.
2010 05 04
Why do students not use their feedback?
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
The feedback is delivered as a authoritative monologue
When the teacher expresses authority
through the feedback, students tend to take
on a passive role and comply with the
teacher’s comments – even if it means
abandoning their own ideas.
COMMON OBSTACLES:
The teacher makes use of imperatives,
”obliging modalities”, or an insensitive tone
in the feedback – sending the message
that the teacher’s point of view cannot be
contested.
The students are grades, but are not
informed about the grading criteria.
2010 05 04
Why do students not use their feedback?
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
Not everyone knows how to use the feedback productively
Many students do not possess any
strategies for using the feedback they
receive. The students refer to very diffuse
strategies, such as ”keeping the feedback in
mind” or ”having to work harder next time”.
COMMON OBSTACLES:
The students are not taught effective
strategies for using feedback.
2010 05 04
Why do students not use their feedback?
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
The students do not understand the ”academic discourse”
A lot of students do not understand the
comments they receive. Surprisingly often
this is due to illegible handwriting, but also a
lack of understanding of common terms,
such as ”analysis” or ”logical conclusion”.
COMMON OBSTACLES:
The students are given only words – not
examples.
The students are seldom given the
opportunity to discuss the meaning of their
feedback or the assessment criteria.
2010 05 04
How to make students use their feedback?
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
• In-built structures for using feedback• The student are active in both using and producing
feedback• The feedback process is dialogic • The students learn how to use feedback as an integrated
part of instruction• The students can learn from each other
From Pryor & Crossouard(2010)
2010 05 04
Criteria
Criteria
How to make students use their feedback?
Sweden
MALMÖ UNIVERSITY
Studentanswer
Studentanswer
Modelanswer
(feedback)
Modelanswer
(feedback)
Task: Compare your answer with the model answer. What strenghts and weaknesses can you identify?
How can your answer be improved?
Task: Compare your answer with the model answer. What strenghts and weaknesses can you identify?
How can your answer be improved?