1 Writing & publishing academic papers (additional slides) Edwin van Teijlingen.
2009 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Additional Slides
54
2009 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Additional Slides Important Information About the Performance of Different Groups 1
description
1. 2009 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Additional Slides. Important Information About the Performance of Different Groups. 2006 - 2009 ELA: Students with Disabilities . 2. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4. Number of Students with Disabilities Tested. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of 2009 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Additional Slides
2009 Grade 3-8English Language Arts
Additional Slides
Important Information About the Performance of Different Groups
1
2006 - 2009 ELA: Students with Disabilities
20.2% 22.8% 27.9% 39.3%
Grades 3-8
2006 2007 2008 2009
Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4
Grades 3-8: 166,511 173,369 181,381 182,847
2006 2007 2008 2009
Number of Students with Disabilities Tested
2
617 625 631 641
Grades 3-8
2006 2007 2008 2009
2006 - 2009 ELA: Students with Disabilities
650
Mean Scale Scores
3
2006 - 2009 ELA: English Language Learners
16.2% 18.0%25.1%
36.4%
Grades 3-8
2006 2007 2008 2009
Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4
2006 2007 2008 2009Grades 3-8: 32,420 72,082 73,199 74,854
Number of ELL Students Tested
4
614 620 630 640
Grades 3-8
2006 2007 2008 2009
2006 - 2009 ELA: English Language Learners
650
Mean Scale Scores
5
Among Asian students, the percentage reaching Level 3 & 4 increased for most students as they moved from one grade to the next through the past 4 years of school.
85.1
%
83.5
%
81.1
%
77.1
%
72.0
%
67.1
%79.0
%
79.7
%
78.8
%
75.6
%
71.0
%
69.5
%79.8
%
83.1
%
86.0
%
77.8
%
80.5
%
70.0
%
87.3
%
86.7
%
89.3
%
89.6
%
87.1
%
79.6
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in2009
Grade 11 in2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
6
The percentage of Asian students in Level 1 has declined dramatically.
2.5%
2.9%
2.6%
2.7%
3.4% 4.6%
4.1%
3.9%
3.0%
1.6% 4.5%
4.5%
2.7% 3.8%
1.1%
1.2%
1.3% 4.2%
2.1%
2.0%
0.5%
0.1%
0.6% 1.8%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
Percentage of Students at Level 1
7
The average score of this year’s Asian 6th and 7th graders has declined as they have moved from one grade to the next through school, even though more of those students are reaching Level 3 & 4. However, this year’s Asian students generally have higher average scores than Asian students in those grades did 4 years before.
686
681
678
673
668
666
679
677
675
673
666
667
678 680
676
670 672
668
682
682 68
6
679
675
671
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Mean Scale Scores
8
The percentage of American Indians scoring in Level 3 & 4 has increased as they have progressed through school.
49.3
%
54.6
%
53.2
%
45.9
%
43.0
%
34.4
%
56.1
%
54.4
%
56.5
%
51.3
%
43.5
%
44.9
%58.4
%
61.6
%
67.6
%
57.3
%
58.7
%
42.2
%
65.7
%
68.8
% 76.7
%
74.1
%
73.9
%
55.2
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in2009
Grade 11 in2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
9
The percentage of American Indian students scoring in Level 1 has decreased significantly as they have moved through the past 4 years of school.
15.5
%
15.9
%
9.9% 13
.2%
12.2
%
14.0
%
12.9
%
12.3
%
6.9%
3.7% 9.
7%
8.2%
7.1% 11
.6%
2.3%
2.3%
2.0% 7.
7%
5.1%
5.8%
0.4%
0.3%
1.0%
2.0%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
Percentage of Students at Level 1
10
651
651
651
642
640
637
656
652
654
652
643 646
658
655 65
9
653
654
644
659
660 66
9
660
659
652
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
American Indians have also increased their average scores on the tests as they have moved from one grade to the next through school.
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Mean Scale Scores
11
Results Tracked Over Time
By Gender and Race / Ethnicity
12
The percentage of Black male students scoring in Level 3 & 4 increased considerably as they progressed through school over the past 4 years – except for this year’s 8th graders. And all students are achieving at higher levels than students in those same grades did 4 years ago.
45.2
%
47.5
%
44.4
%
36.1
%
31.5
%
22.0
%
46.0
%
46.3
%
48.3
%
39.1
%
30.9
%
30.0
%
52.0
%
50.5
% 60.9
%
44.3
%
46.2
%
29.3
%
56.9
%
60.1
%
67.0
%
64.0
%
61.5
%
44.5
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
13
645
644
641
633
629
624
646
644 64
8
643
633
633
652
645 65
4
646
646
636
653
654 66
1
655
654
645
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
The average scores of Black males also increased as they moved from one grade to the next through the 4 years of school.
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Mean Scale Scores
14
The percentage of Hispanic male students scoring in Level 3 & 4 increased considerably as they moved through school over the 4 years, except for this year’s 8th graders. And all students are achieving at higher levels than Hispanic students did in those same grades 4 years ago.
53.9
%
51.9
%
49.7
%
39.8
%
35.2
%
26.5
%
47.0
%
47.7
%
48.2
%
41.4
%
35.2
%
32.5
%
59.9
%
52.6
% 63.2
%
43.9
%
49.0
%
31.7
%
59.0
%
61.6
% 69.9
%
65.7
%
63.2
%
47.6
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
15
652
648
645
637
632
629
646
644 647
644
634
633
651
647 65
5
646
647
636
654
654 66
3
656
654
645
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
The average scores of Hispanic males also increased as they moved through school over the 4 years – except for this year’s 8th graders.
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Mean Scale Scores
16
2009 ELA American Indian/ Alaskan Native Males
47.0
%
48.9
%
50.4
%
40.8
%
36.9
%
27.6
%
52.8
%
51.4
%
51.5
%
47.1
%
35.1
%
36.5
%
51.6
%
56.2
% 65.4
%
50.8
%
51.9
%
34.5
%
60.7
%
63.9
% 73.7
%
70.7
%
69.8
%
48.5
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
Results Tracked Over Time: 2006 - 2009Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
17
646
645 648
637
634
630
653
648 651
649
637
638
655
650 65
8
648 651
638
655
655
667
656
656
648
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
Grades 3-8 ELA: American Indian/ Alaskan Native MalesMean Scale Scores Tracked Over Time: 2006 - 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
18
The percentage of White male students scoring in Level 3 & 4 as they moved through school shows the gains are often smaller than for Black and Hispanic male students. But overall performance is still higher than for Blacks and Hispanics.
73
.3%
74.0
%
75.1
%
68.1
%
65.3
%
55.4
%
75.2
%
76.4
%
78.1
%
72.1
%
65.6
%
64.8
%78.6
%
77.3
%
84.8
%
75.4
%
76.2
%
61.8
%
80.2
%
82.3
%
88.4
%
86.0
%
87.1
%
75.1
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
19
672
669
669
662
659
655
675
671
673
666
660
661
676
670
672
665
665
660
674
673
681
668 67
1
664
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
The average score of this year’s 6th and 8th grade White male students has not improved as they moved through school over the 4 years. The average score of this year’s 7th graders has improved very little. But all students are achieving at higher levels than students in those grades did 4 years ago.
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Mean Scale Scores
20
The percentage of Asian male students scoring in Level 3 & 4 as they move through school shows the gains are often smaller than for Black and Hispanic male students. But overall performance is still higher than for Blacks and Hispanics.
82.4
%
81.1
%
78.1
%
73.8
%
68.2
%
61.6
%75.5
%
76.6
%
77.0
%
71.8
%
66.7
%
64.5
%76.9
%
80.1
%
83.9
%
74.3
%
75.9
%
64.6
%
85.0
%
84.0
%
87.8
%
87.1
%
84.7
%
75.0
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
21
681
678
675
669
664
661
675
673
673
669
661
662
675
675
674
666
667
661
678
678 68
4
674
672
666
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
The average score of each class of Asian males has declined, except for this year’s 4th and 5th graders. But all students are achieving at higher levels than their counterparts 4 years ago.
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Mean Scale Scores
22
The percentage of Black female students scoring in Level 3 & 4 has increased considerably as they moved through school over the 4 years. And all students are achieving at higher levels than Black females did in those same grades 4 years ago.
56.5
%
56.2
%
53.4
%
46.5
%
40.6
%
34.0
%
56.3
%
56.4
%
54.3
%
49.8
%
45.1
%
43.4
%
60.6
%
62.6
%
67.6
%
55.8
%
62.5
%
44.9
%
69.9
%
69.8
%
73.5
%
74.7
%
72.7
%
59.1
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
23
656
655
650
644
639
637
655
655
654
652
646
645
660
657
658
654
656
649
663
663
665
661
660
654
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
The average scores of Black females also increased as they moved through school over the 4 years.
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Mean Scale Scores
24
The percentage of Hispanic female students scoring in Level 3 & 4 increased considerably as they moved through school over the 4 years, except for this year’s 8th graders. And all students are achieving at higher levels than Hispanic female students did in those same grades 4 years ago.
64.0
%
59.2
%
55.2
%
47.0
%
41.9
%
36.4
%
54.5
%
54.1
%
51.9
%
48.2
%
44.9
%
42.8
%56.7
%
61.3
%
67.5
%
52.4
% 60.3
%
43.2
%
68.7
%
68.2
%
73.4
%
73.8
%
70.7
%
57.8
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
25
663
657
651
645
641
639
654
652
651
651
644
643
656
656
658
652 655
646
662
661 66
6
661
659
653
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
The average scores of Hispanic females now in middle school increased slightly as they moved through school over the 4 years; this year’s 5th and 6th graders made bigger gains. And all students are achieving at higher levels Hispanic females did in those same grades 4 years ago.
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Mean Scale Scores
26
The percentage of White female students scoring in Level 3 & 4 as they moved from one grade to the next through 4 years of school shows the gains are often smaller than for Black and Hispanic female students. But overall performance is still higher than for Blacks and Hispanics.
81.2
%
80.4
%
79.6
%
75.1
%
71.7
%
67.0
%81.7
%
82.4
%
82.0
%
78.8
%
75.4
%
76.1
%
82.9
%
84.3
%
87.9
%
82.5
%
84.7
%
75.1
%87.6
%
87.8
%
91.7
%
91.1
%
91.9
%
83.6
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
27
682
678
675
671
666
667
683
680
678
675
670 672
681
681
677
673
673
673
682
682 68
5
676
677
673
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
The average score of this year’s 6th, 7th, and 8th grade White females has not increased as they have moved through school over the 4 years. It has increased modestly for this year’s 4th and 5th graders. But all White females are achieving at higher levels than White females in those same grades did 4 years ago.
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Mean Scale Scores
28
The percentage of Asian female students scoring in Level 3 & 4 as they move through school shows the gains are often smaller than for Black and Hispanic female students. But overall performance is very high and higher than for Blacks and Hispanics.
87
.9%
85.9
%
84.4
%
80.5
%
76.2
%
73.0
%82.6
%
83.0
%
80.8
%
79.5
%
75.5
%
74.9
%82.8
%
86.2
%
88.1
%
81.5
%
84.5
%
75.9
%89.8
%
89.4
%
90.8
%
92.3
%
89.8
%
84.4
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
29
690
685
681
678
672
672
683
682
678
679
671 67
3
681 68
5
679
674 67
7
675
686
687
687
684
678
677
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
The average score of each class of Asian females has declined, except for this year’s 4th and 5th graders. But all students are achieving at higher levels than their counterparts 4 years ago.
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Mean Scale Scores
30
2009 ELA American Indian/ Alaskan Native Females
51.7
% 60.6
%
56.7
%
51.3
%
48.7
%
41.6
%
59.5
%
57.2
%
62.0
%
56.2
%
53.0
%
52.7
%65.4
%
67.1
%
69.7
%
64.6
%
66.7
%
50.8
%
70.6
%
73.9
%
79.8
%
77.5
%
78.6
%
63.0
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
Results Tracked Over Time: 2006 - 2009Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
31
655
657
653
647
645
643
658
656
658
656
649 65
3661
660
660
659
659
650
663 66
6 672
663
662
657
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
Grades 3-8 ELA: American Indian/ Alaskan Native Females
Mean Scale Scores Tracked Over Time: 2006 - 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
32
A similar picture emerges in the Urban-Suburban High Need Districts.
61.4
%
61.7
%
58.8
%
51.2
%
44.7
%
38.3
%
59.9
%
60.9
%
60.7
%
54.7
%
46.9
%
47.1
%
63.7
%
64.7
%
71.0
%
59.2
%
61.0
%
44.8
%
68.9
%
72.1
%
78.1
%
75.9
%
73.1
%
58.0
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
86 7 8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
33
660
658
654
647
642
640
659
657
658
654
646
646
662
658 66
1
655
655
647
663
663 66
9
662
660
653
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
In the Urban- Suburban High Need districts, average student scores have also increased slowly as students moved through school over the past 4 years. Students this year are scoring higher than did students in those same grades 4 years ago.
Mean Scale Scores
34
Grades 3-8 ELA: Rural NRC
65.3
%
62.5
%
63.5
%
56.0
%
51.3
%
44.7
%
65.9
%
67.1
%
68.9
%
62.7
%
54.7
%
54.9
%68.6
%
68.8
% 77.1
%
67.3
%
68.6
%
52.4
%
72.9
%
73.8
% 83.8
%
80.6
%
80.9
%
66.6
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
Results Tracked Over Time: 2006 - 2009Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
86 7 8
35
663
658
657
651
647
646
664
662
664
659
652
653
665
662 665
660
660
653
665
665 67
4
665
665
658
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
Mean Scale Scores Tracked Over Time: 2006 - 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Grades 3-8 ELA: Rural NRC 36
In Average Need districts, the percentage of students scoring in Level 3 & 4 as they moved through school shows the gains are often smaller than for some High Need districts. But overall performance is still higher than for High Need districts.
74.7
%
75.3
%
74.9
%
68.8
%
65.8
%
57.9
%
76.1
%
77.1
%
77.7
%
73.0
%
67.3
%
68.2
%78.2
%
78.5
%
84.3
%
76.7
%
78.2
%
65.3
%
81.4
%
83.1
%
88.4
%
87.2
%
88.0
%
77.4
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
86 7 8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
37
674
671
669
663
660
657
675
672
673
668
662 664
676
673
671
667
667
663
674
675 68
1
671
672
666
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
In Average Need districts, the average score of this year’s 6th and 8th grade students has not improved as they moved through school over the past 4 years. The average score of this year’s 7th graders has improved very little. But all students (except this year’s 3rd graders) are achieving at higher levels than students in those grades did 4 years ago.
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Mean Scale Scores
38
In Low Need districts, the percentage of students scoring in Level 3 & 4 has reached very high levels. However, growth has been relatively small as students have moved through school.
85.5
%
87.0
%
87.1
%
82.8
%
80.3
%
74.7
%86.2
%
87.7
%
86.9
%
84.4
%
81.6
%
82.0
%
88.1
%
88.8
%
92.4
%
87.2
%
88.5
%
80.4
%90.3
%
91.7
%
93.8
%
93.4
%
94.0
%
87.8
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
86 7 8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
39
687
685
684
679
675
673
688
685
683
679
675 67
8
688
686
681
677
676 67
8
686
687 68
9
679
680
676
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
In Low Need districts, average scores have declined somewhat for many classes of students as they have moved through school.
Mean Scale Scores
40
Among students in low-income families, the percentage scoring at Level 3 & 4 has increased significantly over time as this year’s 5th, 6th, and 7th graders have moved from one grade to the next through the past 4 years of school.
60.7
%
59.1
%
56.7
%
48.6
%
43.0
%
35.0
%
54.1
%
55.0
%
55.8
%
48.5
%
41.6
%
42.4
%57.3
%
58.6
% 67.1
%
51.6
%
56.8
%
39.8
%
65.9
%
66.5
%
73.4
%
71.5
%
69.7
%
54.5
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
86 7 8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
41
660
656
652
646
641
639
653
651
653
650
641
642
656
653 65
8
651
653
644
660
659 66
6 670
658
651
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Among students in low-income families, the average scale score has significantly increased over time as this year’s 5th and 6th (but not this year’s 7th or 8th) graders have moved from one grade to the next through 4 years of school.
Mean Scale Scores
42
In Rochester, the percentage of students scoring in Level 3 & 4 has increased significantly as this year’s 4th, 5th and 6th graders have moved from one grade to the next over the past 4 years.
47.4
%
50.1
%
42.0
%
41.2
%
28.3
%
26.3
%
43.0
%
47.4
%
45.2
%
42.1
%
29.0
%
27.8
%
44.1
% 52.3
%
58.3
%
56.3
%
40.0
%
31.1
%
49.0
% 57.0
%
64.5
%
69.7
%
53.1
%
43.1
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
43
650
647
639
639
627
628
645
646
646
646
631
629
648
648 651
653
642
635
647 65
1 658
657
649
642
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
In Rochester, a similar pattern emerges in average student scores.
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Mean Scale Scores
44
47.4
%
50.1
%
42.0
%
41.2
%
28.3
%
26.3
% 38.4
%
43.0
%
47.4
%
45.2
%
42.1
%
29.0
%
27.8
% 38.4
%
44.1
%
52.3
%
58.3
%
56.3
%
40.0
%
31.1
% 46.6
%
49.0
%
57.0
%
64.5
%
69.7
%
53.1
%
43.1
% 56.0
%
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grades 3-8
2006 2007 2008 2009
In Rochester more students are achieving Levels 3 & 4 at each grade.
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
45
650
647
639
639
628 637645
646
646
631
629 64
0648
648
651
653
642
635 64
6
647
651 658
657
649
642 651
62764
6
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grades 3-8
2006 2007 2008 2009
650
In Rochester, average scale scores are higher than ever for all grades except grade 3.
Mean Scale Scores
46
In Syracuse, the percentage of students scoring in Level 3 & 4 has increased as students have moved from one grade to the next during the past 4 years.
41.3
%
43.4
%
37.3
%
33.1
%
28.3
%
21.3
%
41.4
%
45.4
%
47.5
%
34.0
%
27.9
%
28.3
%
43.8
%
45.1
%
52.4
%
40.7
%
40.1
%
30.8
%
50.0
%
49.4
% 59.9
%
65.4
%
57.8
%
41.0
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
47
642
641
633
632
625
623
644
643 64
8
639
631
630
646
643 64
9
644
641
63664
7
646 65
7
654
652
643
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
In Syracuse, students have generally made significant gains in average scores as they have moved from one grade to the next during the past 4 years.
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Mean Scale Scores
48
41.3
%
43.4
%
37.3
%
33.1
%
28.3
%
21.3
% 34.0
%
41.4
%
45.4
%
47.5
%
34.0
%
27.9
%
28.3
% 37.3
%
43.8
%
45.1
%
52.4
%
40.7
%
40.1
%
30.8
% 42.1
%
50.0
%
49.4
% 59.9
%
65.4
%
57.8
%
41.0
% 52.7
%
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grades 3-8
2006 2007 2008 2009
In Syracuse, the percentage of students meeting the standards has increased for all grades from 4 years ago.
Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4
49
642
641
633
632
623 63
3644
648
639
631
630 63
9646
643
649
644
641
636 643
647
646 65
7
654
652
643 650
62564
3
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grades 3-8
2006 2007 2008 2009
650
In Syracuse, average scale scores for each grade are at their highest level ever.
Mean Scale Scores
50
In Yonkers, students in the early grades are showing the largest gains in the percentage of students scoring in Level 3 & 4 as students move through school.
60.3
% 70.9
%
64.9
%
45.0
%
37.2
%
31.8
%
55.6
%
55.1
%
51.5
%
44.6
%
39.1
%
35.1
%
59.3
%
64.2
%
67.0
%
52.6
%
53.0
%
37.7
%
70.1
%
67.5
%
72.8
%
59.5
%
64.4
%
50.4
%
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
Note: Yonkers has a very large population of English Language Learners. 2007 was the first year the federal government required all ELL students to be tested, except for those in this country for one year or less.
51
661 67
1
662
643
635
634
655
653
651
648
638
638
659
658
657
651
651
642
664
660 66
6
656
657
648
Grade 3 in 2009 Grade 4 in 2009 Grade 5 in 2009 Grade 6 in 2009 Grade 7 in 2009 Grade 8 in 2009 Grade 9 in 2009 Grade 10 in 2009 Grade 11 in 2009
2006 2007 2008 2009
Except for an unusual first year (2006), Yonkers’ average scale scores also frequently show gains as students move from one grade to the next over time, especially for the early grades.
3 3 54 565 63 4 73
Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016
4 6 75 8
Grade 3 in 2006
Class of 2015
Grade 4 in 2006
Class of 2014
4
Grade 5 in 2006
Class of 2013
6 7 88 7
Grade 6 in 2006
Class of 2012
Grade 7 in 2006
Class of 2011
Grade 8 in 2006
Class of 2010
8
650
Note: Yonkers has a very large population of English Language Learners. 2007 was the first year the federal government required all ELL students to be tested, except for those in this country for one year or less.
52
60.3
% 70.9
%
64.9
%
45.0
%
37.2
%
31.8
%
51.1
%
55.6
%
55.1
%
51.5
%
44.6
%
39.1
%
35.1
% 46.7
%59.3
%
64.2
%
67.0
%
52.6
%
53.0
%
37.7
%
55.6
%70.1
%
67.5
%
72.8
%
59.5
%
64.4
%
50.4
% 65.2
%
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grades 3-8
2006 2007 2008 2009
In Yonkers, students this year have higher scores than did students in those same grades 4 years ago (except for this year’s 3rd and 4th graders).
Percentage of Students Scoring in Levels 3 and 4
53
661 67
1
662
643
634 65
0
655
651
648
638
638 64765
9
658
657
651
651
642 65
3664
660
666
656
657
648 65
9
63565
3
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grades 3-8
2006 2007 2008 2009
650
Students in Yonkers this year have higher scale scores that students in those same grades 4 years before, except in grade 4.
54
