2006 FSUTMS/CUBE Voyager Model Conversion & Support Survey Model Task Force Meeting December 2006.
-
Upload
constance-ward -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 2006 FSUTMS/CUBE Voyager Model Conversion & Support Survey Model Task Force Meeting December 2006.
2006 FSUTMS/CUBE Voyager Model Conversion &
Support Survey
Model Task Force MeetingDecember 2006
22006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
Annual MTF SurveyOctober 25-November 17, 2006
Participants58 Participants
MPO’s, FDOT, Consulting firms
Introduction
32006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
Introduction
Purpose: “FDOT’s Systems Planning Office administers the FSUTMS (Florida standard model) User Satisfaction and Support Survey annually as part of its quality assurance process. This survey gives the opportunity for the Model Task Force and Citilabs (software vendor of Cube/Voyager) to evaluate the quality of the products and services provided to the Florida modeling community.”
42006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
Introduction
14 Questions:Model Task Force Support
FDOT Technical Support
Citilabs Support
Rating Scale1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)
52006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
3.57
3.74
3.42
Model Task Force Support(Questions 1 to 3)
Statement
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
1 2 3 4 5
FDOT Technical Support
1. MTF providing clear direction and guidance to Florida modeling community
2. MTF adequately addressing modeling needs
3. MTF implementing standard procedures and state-of-the-art modeling practices statewide
and issues of FSUTMS users
62006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
Model Task Force Support(Questions 1 to 3 Summary)
Respondent Comments
Florida MTFHeaded in right direction
Still many uncertainties
Need faster standardization progress
72006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
3.68
3.83
3.93
FDOT & Users’ Group Support(Questions 4 to 6)
Statement
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
1 2 3 4 5
FDOT Technical Support
4. FSUTMS users’ groups help disseminate new modeling technology and policy direction
5. FSUTMS workshops meet users’ needs
6. Technical updates, manuals, newsletter, web portal, and user survey meet expectations
82006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
FDOT & Users’ Group Support(Questions 4 to 6 Summary)
Respondent Comments
Users’ GroupsCreate good knowledge-sharing atmosphere
Need more outreach to non-modelers
Statewide Training WorkshopsDifficult due to differences in local models
Most web site downloads not yet available
Newsletter very informative
92006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
3.69
3.71
Citilabs Support(Questions 7 to 9)
Statement
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
1 2 3 4 5
Citilabs Support
7. Citilabs provides adequate technical support in a timely manner
8. I am satisfied with the solutions to specific
9. The Cube Voyager software meets my technical questions provided by Citilabs
overall modeling needs
3.60
102006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
Citilabs Support(Questions 7 to 9 Summary)
Respondent Comments
Good quality and timeliness of responses
Mixed response on VoyagerConversion of models still in transition
Issues with PT program
Failure to integrate ArcGIS into Cube
112006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
Suggestions for Model Task Force
Adopt statewide standardsDocument each model’s non-standard aspectsShort-term and long-term plan of activitiesFunding for surveysMore interaction with traffic ops and PD&EMore frequent MTF meetingsConvey reasons for conversion delaysAddress problems with FTA acceptance of FSUTMSMore technical presentationsFewer committees
122006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
Suggestions for Citilabs
Improve Cube’s help menu and documentation
Fix PT
Update and improve scripting process
Complete ArcGIS integration
Develop script writing manual
Better guidance on transit and toll modeling
Enhance Cube’s analysis and reporting capabilities
Coordinate better on conversion status
132006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
Suggestions for FDOT Planning
More MPO-specific model trainingMore computer-based or web-based trainingDetailed guidance on post-processing proceduresEnsure accuracy of non-MPO county networksBetter communication on research projects and future directionsFaster progress on standardizationAddress outdated networks, zone structure, and socioeconomic dataAddress previous MTF meeting feedback
142006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
Action Plan
Model Task ForceWorking with FTA on PT modeling issuesDevelop 5-year work program for FSUTMSReorganize committees
CitilabsWorking with MTF to fix PT issuesArcGIS integration making progressBeef up technical supportCommitted to working with MTF
152006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey
Action Plan
FDOT Systems Planning OfficeWorking on FSUTMS standardization
Implement 5-year work program for FSUTMS
Revising training work program