2006 Accreditation Criteria

22
2006 ACCREDITATION CRITERIA What everyone needs to know about CME credits for educational programs

description

Tool for developing educational activity acceptable for ACCME accreditation

Transcript of 2006 Accreditation Criteria

Page 1: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

2006 ACCREDITATION CRITERIA

What everyone needs to know about CME credits for educational

programs

Page 2: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

SO WHAT?

• ACCME: Accreditation Council on CME• ACCME sanctions our CME program • New expectations for CME providers• Criteria have been developed• To maintain accreditation we must keep to

the spirit and word of the criteria

Page 3: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

WHO CARES?

• ACCME requires adoption of new criteria• CME Office is under a mandate to accept• The Health System benefits with

improved competence and performance of the physicians and health professionals

• Physicians benefit by improved job satisfaction

• Patients have better outcomes

Page 4: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

WHAT’S IN IT FOR ME?

• Educational programs developed to improve real problems

• Educational programs designed to correct the root cause of the identified gap

• Educational programs targeted to the correct audience

• Educational programs that demonstrate improved patient care

• More efficient use of time and effort• Better patient outcomes

Page 5: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 2

• Professional practice gaps are identified• Educational interventions and activities are

designed based on educational needs• Educational needs may require

interventions that improve:– Knowledge– Competence– Performance

Page 6: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 2 (continued)

• Definition of a practice gap– Current practice or outcome– Achievable practice or outcome– Requires benchmarking

• The provider working with the learner group determines using deduction– Is lack of knowledge the cause?– Is an effective strategy the cause?– Is poor performance the cause?

Page 7: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 2 (continued)

• What is an example of a professional knowledge gap?– Management of hospitalized patients blood glucose (Knowledge

alone is unacceptable must affect patient outcome)

• What is an example of a professional strategy gap?– Anticoagulation safety initiative (Competence)

• What is an example of a professional performance gap?– Hand washing and hospital acquired infections (What they

actually do in practice)

Page 8: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 2 (continued)

• What constitutes professional practice?– Clinical– Patient care – Research– Administrative

Page 9: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 2 (continued)

• What is considered non-compliance?– No evidence of gap analysis between current

performance and desired performance– Courses designed to help learners pass board

examinations because they are not linked to a gap in physician knowledge

– Statistical data alone does not does not prove the provider identified knowledge, competence or performance was the root cause

– The educational activities have to be linked to the gap – Literature and evaluations alone are unacceptable

Page 10: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

SUMMARY CRITERION 2

• Data gathering• Analyze trended data• Compare with benchmarks• Deduce cause of gap• Develop educational activity• Examine trended data after the

intervention

Page 11: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 3

• Educational design• Designed to change behavior

– Competence– Performance– Patient outcomes

• Activities/educational interventions• Mission statement contains goals

Page 12: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 3 (continued)

• Implementation Criterion 2– Everything is based on practice gap

• Planning of CME must attempt to change– Competence– Performance– Patient outcomes

• Knowledge alone is unacceptable– Convert to change in competence,

performance or patient outcomes

Page 13: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 3 (continued)

• Educational design for changing competence– Case based scenario learning with ARS

• Educational design to change performance– Surgical skills lab with improved patient outcomes

• Educational design to change patient outcomes– Gap analysis results in improved patient outcomes

Page 14: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 3 (continued)

• What is considered non-compliance?– Activities must be designed to change

behaviors• Competence, performance or patient outcomes

– Activities and programs that were designed only to change knowledge• Competence, performance or patient outcomes

Page 15: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 4

• Content matches learners current or potential scope of professional activities

• What do the learners actually do in their practice

• Educational activities and interventions are congruent with learners practice

Page 16: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 4 (continued)

• Align content with the learners scope of practice– Psychiatrists don’t require training on the Da

Vinci robot• Match scope of practice

– Development of clinical guidelines is appropriate

• Don’t forget RSSs must be data driven

Page 17: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 5

• Educational format is appropriate– Consider setting– Consider objectives – Consider desired results

• Activities and and interventions– Didactic– Small group– Interactive– Hands on skill labs

Page 18: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 5 (continued)

• Formats are based on participant feedback or nature of content

• Utilize a variety of formats

Page 19: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 6

• Desirable physician attributes– IOM competencies– ACGME competencies

• Develop activities in terms of competencies– Medical knowledge– Specialty specific

• Consider individual and programmatic level

Page 20: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 6 (continued)

• Activities may be based on– Medical knowledge– Evidence based practice– Quality improvement– Patient centered care– Interpersonal and communication skills

Page 21: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 6 (continued)

• What is considered non-compliance?– RSS must have gap analysis– Desirable physician attributes are included in

self study and selected activities– Must have evidence this was considered in

planning process

Page 22: 2006 Accreditation Criteria

CRITERION 6 (continued)