2 Jointness of the Evaluation Evaluation process Evaluation objectives Context for ARD in Africa...
-
Upload
winfred-bryan -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of 2 Jointness of the Evaluation Evaluation process Evaluation objectives Context for ARD in Africa...
2
Jointness of the Evaluation Evaluation process Evaluation objectives Context for ARD in Africa Selected findings (Performance,
Partnership, and Business Processes) Preliminary conclusions Issues for the Final Report
Contents
3
“Jointness” of the Joint Evaluation Joint Evaluations are promoted by OECD/DAC in line
with the 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid-Effectiveness
IFAD/AfDB evaluation is characterized by a very high degree of “jointness”: represents a “partnership evaluation”
Agreed-upon evaluation methodology, including processes, deliverables & timeframes
A single evaluation team, selected jointly by AfDB and IFAD
One joint final report to be issued by both evaluation outfits
A single budget, financed on a 50:50 basis Co-ordinated communication throughout
4
Possible Risks and Mitigating Measures of the Joint Evaluation
Possible Risks: Different institutional cultures, methodologies, processes and
procedures Different views and interests among the Managements and Boards Unclear roles and responsibilities between key partners Danger of a “lowest common denominator” approach Timeline – actual time devoted to the exercise longer than planned Heavy administration and high costs
Mitigating Measures: Formal MOU signed between IFAD and AfDB on the evaluation, including
specific governance and management arrangements Two-tier structure to manage and govern the Joint Evaluation: An Oversight
Committee and a Joint Secretariat Three Senior Independent Advisers of international standing from day one to
provide strategic and technical guidance
5
Process Establishment of an MOU (July 2007) and Approach
Paper Inception Report (January 2008) Interim Report (April 2009):
Past performance of AfDB/IFAD (meta evaluation) Emerging challenges and prospects for ARD in Africa Role of partnerships for development effectiveness Business processes
Portfolio review (quality at entry) Country Synthesis Report
Field work in eight countries
Final report (December 2009)
6
Determine relevance of IFAD/AfDB policies and operations
Assess performance and impact of AfDB/IFAD policies and operations
Evaluate strategic partnerships of IFAD/AfDB
Develop recommendations to enhance effectiveness
* Forward looking - how can IFAD/AfDB more effectively respond to Africa’s changing environment (food price volatility, climate change, Accra Agenda for Action, economic downturn etc) in partnership with others?
Evaluation objectives
7
Context: Africa on the move
Economic and agricultural growth accelerating Stronger civil society & improved democratic
processes; reduced number of armed conflicts
More regional integration
More space for private sector activities
Rising government commitment to agriculture and rural development
Emerging donors playing increasing role
8
Context: Challenges Remain Adapting to and mitigating climate change Volatile prices for commodities and underdeveloped and
inefficient input/output markets New trade regime required; barriers to integration remain Getting turnaround in fragile states Weak government capacity & poor quality sector institutions
& limited decentralization Inadequate fiscal commitments from national governments Slow pace of regional integration: CAADP still nascent Stagnant volume and quality of aid from traditional donors
9
Emerging Issues for ARD in Africa
Agricultural growth as a key to reducing rural poverty Need to focus on widely shared growth (“the
four Is”):• Improve investment through incentives for farmers
& private sector• Close the infrastructure gap • Focus on innovation as the primary motor for
productivity• Institutional and human capacity development to
overcome weak institutions including for Ag S&T
10
Emerging Issues for ARD in Africa
Improved targeting Small holder farmers
• Majority of poor people in Africa are engaged in agriculture
• Producing for subsistence and the market• Smallholder development is a key to reducing poverty
Bottom Billion• Fall into four traps: conflict, Natural Resources,
Landlocked with poor Neighbors, and Poor Governance and Policy
• Require different instruments and implementation modalities
11
Emerging Issues for ARD in Africa
Enhanced engagement with the Private Sector
AfDB and IFAD traditionally work through governments Agriculture is largely a private sector activity Shift in focus is required (value chain and markets)
Rural Finance Important input for agricultural and non-farm activities It is a challenging area requiring innovation
12
New aid architecture Exploding numbers of players Development assistance shifting to new donors:
emerging countries and private sector 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness
bringing more harmonization, alignment, managing for results
Growing importance of regional African organizations, e.g. NEPAD, CAADP
Emerging Issues for ARD in Africa
13
Imperative for Regional Integration
Small countries depend on regional integration
Regional infrastructure critical for access to markets
Natural resources and environmental management require trans-boundary collective action
Defence against plant and animal epidemics requires collective regional action
Emerging Issues for ARD in Africa
14
Past Performance: AfDB & IFAD Projects (Evaluations 2003-07)
70%
90%
60% 60%50%
66%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
% of satisfactory ratings
Relevance Effectiveness Efficiency
Evaluation Criteria
AfDB
IFAD
15
Project Performance cont.Effectiveness of Project Components
All Projects
N=19
N=29
N=14
N=34
N=6
N=40
N=23
N=35
N=8
N=29
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Livestock development
Community devevelopment &capacity building
Irrigation development
Agricultural Development(Crops)
Micro-enterprise development
Rural Infrastructure
Natural Resources
Institutional Development
Woman-specific activities
Rural finance
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
16
Project Performance cont.
Overall 55% of projects have a satisfactory or moderately satisfactory poverty impact
Impact was good in agricultural production and physical assets
Impact was less positive in promoting access to markets, strengthening gov’t institutions, and natural resource management
Sustainability is the area of greatest concern Weak agency performance for both IFAD and
AfDB as well for the borrowers
17
Country Performance
Relevance of country programmes lower than for projects
Policy dialogue found to be inadequate Partnerships with governments have been
good while partnerships with other development agencies could benefit from a more systematic approach
18
Performance: Emerging Issues
Micro-Macro paradox Rethinking project relevance Not enough attention paid to Gender Rural Finance requires innovative products Strengthening sustainability Enhancing analytic work Strengthening country presence Focusing on sub-sectors
19
Partnerships
So far, the IFAD-AfDB partnership has been modest
Other partnerships have been variable and ad hocThere are opportunities to enhance the
partnership: Joint engagement: complementary strategic areas
Joint leverage: funding for ARD in Africa Joint analysis for better performance Pooled ARD knowledge & experience in Africa Shared learning: organisational change processes Shared resources: programme managers, joint
supervision and country presence
20
Partnerships cont.
Overall there is a proliferation of partnerships and competing demands
Move beyond opportunistic partnerships Require partnership strategies and
organizational reform
21
Business Processes Many important changes to business process have
taken place Long term strategic focus needed by both agencies Knowledge inadequately captured and shared: much is
generated by consultants and must be passed on. Country presence vital with growing emphasis on
country ownership, donor coordination and mutual accountability
HR: the introduction of new policies and operating models require changes in HR
Reforms are at an early stage; thus, it is important to stay the course
22
Preliminary Conclusions
ARD work in Africa is complex- responding to risk and vulnerability requires flexibility and multiple, context-specific project componentsIFAD-AfDB response to context has not been adequateIncreased Gov’t commitment to ARD (Maputo)Recognition of the contribution and importance of AfDB and IFAD to the sector Non-lending activities are as important as lending activities Opportunities to improve performance, impact and sustainability as shortcomings can be addressedStrong partnerships are key - with each other and with other donors and national governments.Complementarity between the organizations could be the basis for future partnerships
23
Issues for the Final Report Africa: positive trends, but continuing volatility and challenges Country context matters! Address diversity Doing things right: business process reforms helping to
improve performance...but are we doing the right things? Relevance and selectivity also key to better results
Better knowledge generation and use in policy and operations, including for risk management, is a missed opportunity
‘Partnership proliferation’ or partnering for results? Identify and develop comparative advantage (within evolving aid architecture), especially at country level
Manage the change: coordinate not only between organisations but also within them by adopting appropriate business processes