2. Business Ethics Unit Newi

8/12/2019 2. Business Ethics Unit Newi

1/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 1

Ethicsconsists of the standards of behavior that our society accepts.

Ethics is the discipline that examines ones moral standards or the moral standards

of society- It asks how these standards apply to our lives and whether these

standards are reasonable or unreasonable?- good or bad reasons

! person starts to do ethics when he or she takes the moral standards absorbed

from family" the society" the religion" from friends" coworkers and asks# $hat do

these standards imply for the situations in which I find myself?. %o these standards

really make sense?

Ethics is the study of moral standards" moral &udgements based on those standards

Business ethicsis a form of applied ethicsthat examines ethical principles

and moral or ethical problems that arise in a business environment.

In the increasingly conscience-focused marketplaces of the '(st century" the

demand for more ethical business processes and actions )known as ethicism*

is increasing.

+usiness ethics can be both a normativeand a descriptivediscipline.

GROWING IMPORTANCE OF BUSINESS ETHICS

Ethics is a set of values and principles that we strongly believe and follow.

It is learning what is right or wrong, and then doing the right thing.

,he concept of business ethics has come to mean various things to various people"

but generally its coming to know what it right or wrong in the workplace and doing

what's right -- this is in regard to effects of products/services and in

relationships with stakeholders.

!fter a host of scamssuch as Enron, World.cometc" business ethics has assumed

a lot of importance. ince everyone - be it an investor" customer or public view an

organi/ation with suspicion it is very important that the organization portrays an

ethical image.

(. Managerial Mischief 0 it includes illegal" unethical" or 1uestionable

practices of individual managers or organi/ations" as well as the causes of

such behaviors and remedies to eradicate them.

'. Moral Mazes 2path- it includes the numerous ethical problems that

managers must deal with on a daily basis" such as potential conflicts of

interest" wrongful use of resources" mismanagement of contracts and

agreements" etc
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applied_ethicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethicismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_(philosophy)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descriptivehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applied_ethicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethicismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_(philosophy)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descriptive


2/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 2

3rigin of +usiness Ethics

+usiness ethics has come to be considered a management discipline"

especially since the birth of the social responsibility movement in the (456s.

!n increasing number of people asserted that because businesses were

making a profit from using our countrys resources" these businesses owed it

to our country to work to improve society. 7any researchers" business

schools and managers have recogni/ed this broader constituency" and in their

planning and operations have replaced the word 8stockholder8 with

8stakeholder"8 meaning to include employees" customers" suppliers and the

wider community.

,oday 469 of business schools teach business ethics. Ethics in the workplace can

be managed through use of codes of ethics" codes of conduct" roles of ethicists and

ethics committees" policies and procedures" procedures to resolve ethical dilemmas"

ethics training" etc.

BENEFITS/IMPORTANCE OF BUSINESS ETHICS

(. !ttention to business ethics has substantially improved society

'. Ethics programs help maintain a moral course in turbulent times

:. Ethics programs cultivate strong teamwork and productivity as they align

employee behaviors with those top priority ethical values preferred by leaders

of the organi/ation.

;. Ethics programs support employee growth and meaning.!ttention to ethics

in the workplace helps employees face reality" both good and bad -- in the

organi/ation and themselves. Employees feel full confidence they can admit

and deal with whatever comes their way

ompanies do not operate in a vacuum but rather are plunged in a universe of

relationships with multiple stakeholders.

$ith the globali/ation the scenario in which companies operate has become even

more complex" given the emergence of global groups of stakeholders.


3/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 3

,he need for a company to behave ethically is described in terms of a

companys need to interact productively with its stakeholders. +usiness Ethics

means conducting all aspects of business and dealing with all stakeholders in an

ethical manner@

M!alit"

P!inci#les ! !ules $ %!al cnduct that #e#le use t decide &hat is

!i'ht ! &!n'

7orality is concerned with the social practices defining right and wrong.

Ethical theory and moral philosophies provide guidelines for &ustification of right

or wrong actions when settling human conflict.

Ao one moral philosophy is accepted by every one Bules of prudence promote

self-interest" doing what is prudent for oneself.

Bules of morality promote the interest of other people.

7orality and prudence should generally work hand-in-hand if a business is to

succeed.

Pu(lic)s a'enc" $! t!anslatin' %!alit" int e*#licit scial 'uidelines

and #!actices and $! sti#ulatin' #unish%ents $! $$enses

7anagers will evaluate the moral dimensions of a decision before making it. ,he

moral yardsticks used to evaluate a decision consist of the moral standards of a

societys culture. +usiness ethics involve the use of moral standards when

making decisions.

7oral standards consist of specific moral norms and general moral principle

moral norms prohibit certain types of behaviour such as lying" stealing and killing.

moral principles provide more general guidelines for behavior and are applicable

to decision

M!alit" and +a& , I

ocieties can pass laws that prohibit people from doing things that are morally

acceptable.

ocieties can pass laws that re1uire people to do things that are morally

unacceptable.

omething that is immoral is not necessarily illegal" and something that is

illegal is not necessarily immoral.

,he law is not the repository of our moral standards and values" even whenthe law is directly concerned with moral problems.


4/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 4

M!alit" and +e'alit" II

! law-abiding person is not necessarily morally sensitive or virtuous" and

from the fact that an act is legally acceptable it does not follow that this act is

morally acceptable.

=egal rights derive from political institutions and must be distinguished from

moral rights since they do not have to be based on moral rights to be

grounded or understood.

7oral rights exist independently of" and form a basis for critici/ing and

&ustifying" legal rights.

M!alit" -. +a&

tatutory law v. case law

tatutory laws are >entral 2 state statutes and their accompanying

administrative regulations.

>ase laws are &udge-made laws that establish influential precedents

that provide material for reflection on both legal and moral 1uestions.

7orality and ethics begin where the law is unclear or not defined

>onsciences#

Cary from person to person and time to time.

!re altered by circumstance" religious belief" life experiences" and training.

!re not consistent from day to day

7oral &ustification must then be based on a source external to conscience itself.

A##!aches t the Stud" $ M!alit"

%escriptive approach - provides a factual description and explanation of moral

behavior and beliefs" as performed by !nthropologists" ociologists" andDistorians.

Beferred to as the scientific study of ethics.

>onceptual approach - analy/es meanings of central terms in ethics such as right"

obligation" &ustice" good" virtue" and responsibility.

rescriptive approach - attempts to formulate and defend basic moral norms or

standards by determining what ought to be done versus what is being done.

Beferred to as normative ethics


5/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 5

Relati-is%

!n ethical theory that claims right and wrong is sub&ectively determined by each

culture

$hat is good is socially accepted and what is bad is socially unacceptable in

a given culture.

,here is no such thing as universal truth in ethics" there are only the various

cultural codes and nothing more.

!n argument against relativism#

,here are some basic moral principles that all societies will have in

common" because those rules are necessary for society to exist.

E'is%

! moral theory that contends all choices either involve or should involve self-

promotion as their sole ob&ective

Ps"chl'ical E'is%

Everyone is always motivated to act in his or her own perceived self-interest.

! main argument against psychological egoism is that there may be no purely

altruistic moral motivation to help other people unless there is personal gain.

Ethical E'is%

,he only valid standard of conduct is the obligation to promote ones own well being

above everyone elses.

Ethical egoists believe that people should not be their brothers keeper" because

people do not completely understand the true needs of others.

Its every man for him in this world

Business Ethics as C%#etiti-e Ad-anta'e $! C%#anies in the Gl(aliatin

E!a


6/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 6

It is increasingly important for companies to deal with ethics as a corporate

strategy that" if uni1uely implemented" could achieve competitive advantage

for the company rather than waiting to react to possible ethical issues of

importance to the targeted stakeholders.

It is the necessity of being ethically proactive company rather than being

ethically reactive company.

Business Ethics as C%#etiti-e Ad-anta'e

!s the speed of comparable tangible assets ac1uisition accelerates and the pace

of imitation 1uickens" firms that want to sustain distinctive global competitive

advantages need to protect" exploit and enhance their uni1ue intangible assets"

particularly integrity )building firms of integrity is the hidden logic of business

ethics*.

+ehavior that is trusting" trustworthy" and cooperative" not opportunistic" will

give the firm a competitive advantage.

ustainable global competitive advantage occurs when a company

implements a value-creating strategy which other companies are unable to

imitate.

For example" a company with superior business leadership skills in enhancing

integrity capacity increases its reputation capital with multiple stakeholders

and positions itself for competitive advantage@

+usiness ethics as competitive advantage involves effective building of

relationships with a companys stakeholders based on its integrity that

maintains such relationships.

!n integrity approach to business can yield strengthened competitiveness# it

facilitates the delivery of 1uality products in an honest" reliable way. ,his

approach can enhance work life by making the workplace more fun and

challenging. It can improve relationships with stakeholders and can instill a

more positive mindset that fosters creativity and innovations among the

stakeholders.

,he purpose of ethics is to enhance our lives and our relationships both inside

and outside of the organi/ation ,he metaphor of a game sees competition in

business as an exciting game" in which each competitor strives to achieve

excellence" satisfy customers" and succeed as a result.

,he motive in this type of game is not to drive out the competition" but to work

hard" play by the rules of the game" and do ones best in order to succeed


7/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 7

Business Ethics And N!%ati-e Phils#h"

7anagers will evaluate the moral dimensions of a decision before making it.

,he moral yardsticks used to evaluate a decision consist of the moral

standards of a societys culture.

+usiness ethics involve the use of moral standards when making decisions.

7oral standards consist of specific moral norms and general moral principle moral

norms prohibit certain types of behaviour such as lying" stealing and killing. 7oral

principles provide more general guidelines for behavior and are applicable to

decision

The!ies $ Business Ethics

2. Inte'!ati-e Scial Cnt!acts The!"

It is a normative theory of business ethics and it allows for moral diversity among

various cultures while maintaining certain universal norms.

! social contract is an informal agreement regarding behavioural norms that are

developed from shared goals beliefs and attitudes of groups of people. >orporations

enhance the welfare of society through the satisfaction of consumer and interest of

workers by leveraging corporationsG special advantages.

,his is the moral foundationH ocial >ontract also serves as a tool to measure the

performance of productive organisations. $hen such organisations fulfill the terms of

the contract" they are morally &ustified. $hen they do not" they should be

condemned. Dyper norms are universal and impose certain conditions on all

business" when they do not" they should be condemned.

Dyper- norms are universal and impose certain conditions on all business activity.

,he macro-social contract functions at the global level provided specific conditions

under which micro- -social contracts may be developed. 7icro-social contracts are

community contracts developed to guide business activity. ,he essential elements of

ocial >ontracts ,heory are shown#

H3PER NORMS

(. ersonal freedom

'. hysical security

:. olitical participation

; . Informed consent


8/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 8

. 3wnership of property

5. Bight to subsistence

J. E1ual dignity to all humans.

Mac! Scial Cnt!act

(. 7oral free space

'. Free consent with right to exist

:. >ompatible with hyper norms

;. riority levels.

Mic! Scial Cnt!act

Individual Aorms

(. %o not lie in negotiations

'. Donour all contracts

:.


9/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 9

I. ,heory of value or theory of good# It decides about what is good or valuable.

,hough it does not make this explicit" it focuses on properties that we want to

be realised in our actions. ,hese properties may be compliance with law of

nature. Duman freedom" social solidarity or a combination of one or more of

them.

'. ,heory of the right# It does not tell about which properties are valuable tells

about what individuals and institutions should do by responding to valuable

properties.

ased on the a!ove, there are two kinds of moral theories"

I. >onse1uentialist or teleological theories

'. Aon-conse1uentialist or non-teleological2deontological ,heories

$hile teleology is the ethics of ends and conse1uences" deontology is the

ethics of duty and obligations.

5. Telel'ical The!ies

,eleological ethics deals with conse1uentialism. It is associated with utilitarianism"

ethical egoism and other goal based approaches to conse1uentialism.

,hese theories emphasis on goals and ends in determining moral 1uality of conduct

and character. It refers to the rightness of actions or moral Kvalues of character. It

uses ends and goals to &ustify virtues and actions.

,eleological theories hold that rightness or wrongness of action is always

determined by its tendency to produce certain conse1uences which are intrinsically

good or bad. ,o assert that right actions are those that have the best

conse1uences. ,hey give priority to Kgood over Kright. !ccording to them" all actions

that maximi/e the good are right actions. $hat is good is independent of what is

right.

,eleological theories provide different views on what is good that should be

promoted. !ccording to egoistic theories" good is the good of the person who isacting. !ccording to universalistic theories"


10/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 10

'. !ll actions that contribute to Kgood are moral actions. !n action that brings

happiness for the greatest number of people" is a right action

:. Besults or conse1uences determine the rightnessH or wrongness of moral

actions.

3ne of the important teleological theories is that of conse1uentialism.

>onse1uentialism" thus" focuses on best conse1uences of our actions for all

concerned. It holds that makes an action right or wrong is its conse1uences only.

,his theory became popular in the (N thcentury.

F!%s $ Cnse6uentialis% 7Cnse6uential The!ies8

2. The!" $ ethical e'is%9 In this form of conse1uentialism"the desired is the

long-term self-interest 6f f the individual. It claims that whi(e making a moral

decision one should consider the long term self 0interest of the decision. hort-term

hort-tenn self.interest" if any" should be sacrificed for sake of long-term self-interest.

G !n action is morally right if the conse1uences of that action are more favourable

than unfavourable. 3nly to the agent performing that action.

4. Utilita!ianis%9 In this form of conse1uentialism" the desired end is not long-term

self-interest of the individual but" it is greatest happiness to the greatest number. !ny

action that brings greatest happiness to the greatest number of people is a desirable

action and should be performed. !dvocates of this thinking are Meremy +entham

and Mohn tuart 7ill.

:. Utilita!ian The!ies $ Business Ethics

a. +enthams !pproach

+entham advocates adopting an action that brings happiness or pleasure to the

community rather than an individual. De &udges pleasure by 1uantity.

One actin is (ette! than the the! i$; it (!in's %!e ha##iness ! #leasu!e

than the the!. He sa"s that #leasu!e can (e %easu!ed (" its intensit";

du!atin; ce!taint" ! unce!taint".

In dete!%inin' &hethe! an actin is %!al ! nt; the onse1uences can be both primary and secondary. For example" non payment of

tax by K! resulting in loss to the tate revenue is primary conse1uence of !s action.

If this leads to nonpayment of tax by others also causing mere harm to tate

exche1uer" !s action is assumed to have secondary conse1uences which are" in

fact" doing more harm to tate exche1uer.

Limitations of Benthams Approach

+enthams theory has the following limitations#


11/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 11

(. !ll actions are not followed by pleasures. ! soldiers action to &oin army is

because of his ideals and not pleasant conse1uences.

'. De" more or less talks of 1uantitative pleasures. 7any 1ualitative factors that

affect moral actions are not taken into account

(. Mill=s A##!ach t Utilita!ianis%

M.. 7ill" a political thinker" published his work KLtilitarianism in (N5:"

(. De said that pleasures differ in 1uantity as well as 1uality. ome pleasures

are more desirable than others. 7an should pursue those actions whose

pleasures are noble and dignified. De said" It is better to be a human being

dissatisfied than a pig satisfied.

De views morality as internal and not external. 7orality regards pleasures and

pains of others and not &ust ones own self. It is the desire to be in unity with

others.

,he principle of utility as outlined by Mohn tuart 7ill is that one is obligated

morally to produce the greatest good for the greatest number. 7ill identified

the good with utility. In calculating whether an action is right or wrong one

needs to pro&ect the total conse1uences for good or ill and determine the

actions in which it is optimised according to situation.

?. @entl'" The!" $ Ethics

@entl'" is a the!" $ ethics ad-cated ("

Phils#he!s such as ant; Rss and hn Ra&ls

,his theory considers actions to be right or wrong regardless of their

conse1uences.

!ctions that have moral values are rightH whether or not they are good. If

telling lies is morally wrongH it remains wrong even if it brings happiness to

same people.

!ctions are" thus" right or wrong depending on whether they are morally right

or wrong" Irrespective of their conse1uences. $hat is Kright has priority over

what is Kgood.

%eontology is derived from the


12/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 12

,here are two approaches to deontology#

(. Act dentl'"- For example# KIn this not break my promise is an

obligation that represents act deontology.

4. Rule dentl'"- It claims that obligations and moral duties can begeneralised. For example" Kwe must always keep our promises is all

obligation that represents rule deontology. ,hese values" actions or duties

are fundamental and do not depend upon circumstances of particular

situations. !ctions are performed according to to rules and not

circumstances. Oant.

ant sa"s ,hat result and conse1uences should not guide our actions. 3ur

actions should follow the moral law.

Acc!din' t Rss" we should all follow our moral duties regardless of theirconse1uences. 3ne moral principle can be sacrificed only for another moral

principle#

han Ra.&ls says that fairness is prior to goodness. Fairness of societys

rules is more important than conse1uences of their rules.

Deontology at a Glance

(. Bightness or wrongness of an action is determined by its morality and not

its conse1uences.

' rominent thinkers are Oant" - Boss and Bawls

:. ,hey give priority to Kright over.


13/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 13

,hey are the theories of ethics that deal with goals and end results of

actions.

. Ri'hts D @uties The!ies $ Business Ethics

,he outcome of a specific decision is irrelevant and what matters is whetherthe decision is ethical. ,he rules provide the guide to ethical decision-making.

Lnlike rule utilitarianism" these rules are based on reason" not conse1uences.

Bights P %uties )Aon-conse1uentialist* principles are either Bights rinciples

or Mustice rinciples.

2. Ri'hts P!inci#les

Bights principles grant a person certain moral or human rights by virtue of being a

human being. ,hese rights are closely associated with duties. It is ones duty not

to violate the rights of others &ust as Kit is the duty of others not to violate hisrights.

,he development of moral rights is generally attributed to Immanuel Oant

)(J';-(N6;*"

De argues that an action is morally right only if you would be willing to have

everyone act the same way in a similar situation.

Oants second principle Gstates" K!ct so that you treat humanity" whether in

your own person" or in that of another" always as an end and never as a

means only. eople should never be treated only as a means to an end but as

ends themselves. ,hus when using people to accomplish your purpose" you

have a duty to respect them as human beings.

Oant considered this categorical imperative to be a moral law. It is an

unconditional law to all G ,o Oant" they Kare absolute duties and a moral act is

performed out of duty only.

avanaugh has cited six rights that are basic to business activity.

,hese include#

(. =ife and safety"

'. ,ruthfulness"

:. rivacy"

;. Freedom of conscience"

. Free speech"

5. rivate property

T& Basic Ri'hts


14/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 14

! #siti-e !i'ht# ! right to receivesomething.

,he right to well-being is a positive right. ,o honor a positive right someone has to

provide something. For instance" providing health care when the well-being of a

person is affected by illness or in&ury.

! ne'ati-e !i'ht# ! right not to be interfered with.

,he right to liberty is a negative right" the right not to have ones freedom interfered

with. It is negative because no one has to do anything to honor it. ,hus one has

the negative right to refuse treatment" and forcing treatment on someone who

declines it would be to violate his or her autonomy.

The The!ies $ ustice

!ssociated with issues of rights" fairness" and Quality

! &ustice act respects your rights. ! &ust act treats you fairly. rinciples of

&ustice may be divided into three types-

@ist!i(uti-e ustice

Betributive &ustice and compensatory &ustice

@ist!i(uti-e ustice

ociety has many benefits and burdens that must be distributed among its

members G +enefits include income" wealth" &obs" education and leisure.+urdens include work" taxes and social and civic obligations. ,he allocation of

benefits and burdens raises 1uestions of distributive &ustice. !llocation can

be made on the basis of#

)a* (. E1ual shares to each person"

)b* '. +ased on need"

)c* :* +ased on effort"

)d* ;. +ased on merit"

)e* . +ased on social contribution.

7ost proponents agree that e1uals should be treated e1ually and une1ual should be

treated une1ually in proportion to the degree of their ine1uality. ,his ine1uality must

be based on relative differences among the parties. ,his concept is referred to as

the formal principle of &ustice

7(8 Ret!i(uti-e ustice

Betributive &ustice is concerned with retribution or punishment for wrongdoing.


15/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 15

,he 1uestions are when it &ust to punish someone is and what should be the

nature punishment.

!ccording to !ristotle" a person is morally responsible G for his actions unless

he has been forced to take.

,hat action or is ignorant of the acts negative conse1uences.

! person should not be held responsible If he is unable to halt the

wrongdoing due to personal inade1uacy or powerful external forces. Must

punishment must also fit the crime.

,he severity of punishment should be in proportion to the magnitude of the

crime.

c8 C%#ensat!" ustice9

>ompensatory &ustice is concerned with compensating the party in&ured by the

wrongful act.

7ost people agree that the in&ured party should be returned to the condition

that existed before the in&ury.

,his includes necessary medical treatment and services and goods that are

needed to rectify the in&ury.

,he compensation should be e1ual to the loss suffered by the in&ured party.

Dowever" problems occur when it is not possible to provide complete

compensation" for example" a life lost cannot be restored.

E'is%

elf-centered form of ethics

,wo forms of ethical egoism# individual and universal

Indi-idual ethical e'is%

Mudges actions only by their effects on ones interests

Lsually re&ected by moral philosophers as a defensible basis of

ethics

Uni-e!sal ethical e'is%

>an include the interests of others when assessing ones

actions

till self-centered# pursuing pleasure and avoiding pain


16/16

M O D U L E : 1 | 16

Enlightened self-interest. >onsiders the interests of others

because the person wants others to do the same toward him or

her

3b&ections raised by moral philosophers

%oes not resolve conflicts in peoples interests

3ne party would always have the pursuit of his or her interests blocked

A %!al the!" that cntends all chices eithe! in-l-e ! shuld in-l-e sel$

#!%tin as thei! sle (ecti-e

Ps"chl'ical E'is%

Everyone is always motivated to act in his or her own perceived self-interest.

! main argument against psychological egoism is that there may be no purely

altruistic moral motivation to help other people unless there is personal gain.

Ethical E'is%

,he only valid standard of conduct is the obligation to promote ones own well being

above everyone elses.

Ethical egoists believe that people should not be their brothers keeper" because

people do not completely understand the true needs of others.

2. Business Ethics Unit Newi

Documents

Transcript of 2. Business Ethics Unit Newi