2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of...

12

Click here to load reader

Transcript of 2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of...

Page 1: 2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of Appeal to Dist Ct

?

4

9

FILED Case No. II CR 22176 21

Dept. 4

CITY OF RENO,

vs.

FEB n 52014 Rec~ Municipal Court

By, Deputy Clerk

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF RENO

COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA

Plaintiff,

ORDER

,Ii ZACHARY BARKER COUGHLIN,

1 .1

12 Defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin bas filed a document entitled "Notice of Appeal

of Judge Howard's II7/[4 Order to the Second Judicial Disl. (sic) Court" wherein he "appeals" two

14 orders of this court dated January 7, 2014, and December 10,2013. The instant motion is a

continuation of numerous pleadings filed snbsequcntto an order ofthe Second Judicial District Court

16 aJ1irming the verdict andjudgment of conviction of this court dated March 15,2012.

17

Delcndant Coughlin also requests a ruling on his motion for new trial. This court has

previously ruled on and denied his "Request to Submit 2/27/12 Motion for New Trial and Motion for

)(l Transfer to Mentall-lcalth Court." (See Order filed December 10,2013.)

21 Other portions of Defendant Coughlin's motion arc difficult, if not impossible, to

comprehend.

Defendant Coughlin is placed on notice that repetitious filings which have already ?4

25 been addressed by this court will, from this date forward, result in a contempt citation.

)6 /II

27 /II

28

Page 2: 2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of Appeal to Dist Ct

1

2

4

5

6

8

9

10

14

15

16

17

19

20

21

26

:n

213

Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the "Notice of Appeal oCJudge Howard's 117114,

Order to the Second Judicial Dis!. (sic) Court" and his appeal of this court's Dccember 10, 2013,

Order arc DENIED.

Dated (his 5th day of February, 2014., I (~~"

Lilt, '(J/f~-~':' Kenneth R. Howard, Judge Reno Municipal Court

Page 3: 2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of Appeal to Dist Ct

1

2

4

"

8

10

11

12

13

1"7

18

: 9

20

21

23

25

26

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to NRCP S(b), I certify that I am an employee o[the Reno Municipal Court,

Reno, Nevada, and that 011 this date I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document,

ORDER on the party(ies) sct forth below:

Placing said document in a sealed envelope placed for collecting and mailing in the United States mail, at Reno, Nevada, postage prepaid, following ordinary business practices.

Facsimile (FAX).

Reno/Carson Messenger Service.

Federal Express or other overnight delivery.

Inncr-oflicc mail following ordinary business practices.

Personal Delivery.

City Attorney's orncc P.O. Box 1900 Reno, Nevada 89509

Mr. Zachary Barker Coughlin c/o of" Washoe County Jail Reno, Nevada

DATED this .-,"",c._day of February, 2014,

Veronica Lopez

Page 4: 2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of Appeal to Dist Ct

1

2

6

I

(I

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

II

18

19

20

21

22

21

6

28

FILED Case No. II CR 22176 21 Dept. 4 JAN 07

Reno MunlcipaiCo~rt

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CIWe~RENO ~(J~~~CI6rk COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA

CITY OF RENO, Plaintiff,

vs. ORDER

ZACIIARY BARKER COUGHLIN,

Defendant. I

Defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin has filed a document entitled "Notice oCAppeal

of 12/10/13 Order to 2JDC (sic); Request for Submission of 2/27112 Motion". This motion is a

continuation of numerous pleadings filed subsequent to an Order oflhe Second Judicial District COUl1

aftirming the verdict andjudgmcnt of conviction of this Court dated March 15,2012.

Defendant Coughlin has heen previously advised that an appeal in a civil or criminal

case originating in thc Reno Municipal Court mLlst be taken and perfected in (he same manner as the

same type of appeal from the Justice's Courts, as provided in the Nevada Revised Statutes. Reno

Municipal Code Sec. 2.16.070. A defendant in a criminal action tried before a Justice of the Peace or

Municipal Court Judge may appeal from the finaljudgmcnt to the district court at any time within 10

days from the rendition ofthc judgment. NRS 189.0 10. Defendant Coughlin is well pastthe statutory

time limit for addressing matters that should have been addressed and included in his original appeal

in2011.

Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing,

IT lS HEREBY ORDERED that the Notice of Appeal of 12110113 Order to 2JDC

(sic); Rcqnest for Submission of2/27/12 Motion are DENI!'D.

DATED this 7''' day of January, 2014.

Kenneth R. Howard, Judge Reno Municipal Court

Page 5: 2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of Appeal to Dist Ct

2

.l

4

5

6

8

9

1()

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

J 9

20

21

22

23

c" d

26

78

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I certify that J am an employee ofthe Reno Municipal Court,

Reno, Nevada, and that on this date J served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document,

ORDER on the parly(ies) set forth below:

Placing said document in a sealed envelope placed for collecting and mailing in the United Statcs 111ail, at Reno, Nevada, postage prepaid, following ordinary business practices.

Facsimile (FAX).

Rcno/Carson Messenger Service.

Federal Express or other overnight delivery.

Inner-office mail following ordinary business practices.

Personal Delivery.

City Attorney's Offiee P.O. Box 1900 Reno, Nevada 89509

Mr. Zachary Barker Coughlin c/o of Washoe County Jail Reno, Nevada

DATED this __ . _ day of'January, 2014.

Veronica Lopez

Page 6: 2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of Appeal to Dist Ct

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Case No. I I CR 22176 21

Dept. 4 FILED

OCT 2 ~~. ,,,

IN THE MUNICIJ>AL COURT OF THE CITY OF RENO

COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA

CITY OF RENO, Plaintiff,

VS. ORDER

10 ZACHARY BARKER COUGHLIN,

1 1

12

13

14

15

16

1)

18

19

70

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin has filed a document entitled "Notice of Appeal

of All Orders So Far" and a "Request for Non-Blurry Copy of Filings per Admin (sie) Order 2013-0".

Neither of the submitted motions were typed. It is difficult ifnot impossible for this

Court to follow and understand the Defendant's submissions.

Neither motion is accompanied by Points and Authoritics nor proof that they were

served on thc opposing party, the Reno City Attorney. This is in violation of Reno Municipal Court

Rule 4.

Further, the motions attempt to address an action which was appealed to the Second

Judicial District Court on December 23,20 II. That Court issued its opinion affirming the verdict and

judgment orthe Reno Municipal Court on March 15,2012. An appeal in a civil or criminal case must

be taken and perfected in thc same manner as the same type of appeal from the Justice's Conrts, as

provided in thc Nevada Revised Statutes. Reno Municipal Court Sec. 2.16.070. A defendant in a

criminal action tried before a Justice of the Peace or Municipal Court Judge may appeal from the final

Judgmcnt to the District Court at any time within 10 days from the rendition of tile judgment. NRS

189.010. Defendant Coughlin is well past the statutory time limit for addressing matters that should

Page 7: 2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of Appeal to Dist Ct

1

2

3

4

5

6

I

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2.3

21;

25

26

27

28

have been included in his original appeal in 2011.

Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Notice of Appeal of All Orders So far" and a

"Request for Non-Blurry Copy of Filing per Admin (sic) Order 2013-0" arc DENIED.

Kenneth R. Howard, Judge Reno Municipal Court

Page 8: 2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of Appeal to Dist Ct

1

2

3

5

6

"/

8

9

10

11

12

13

15

1.6

18

19

70

21

23

24

7.5

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I certify that I am an employee of the Reno Municipal Court,

Reno, Nevada, and that on this date I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document,

ORDER on the party(ies) set forth below:

Placing said document in a sealed envelope placed for collecting and mailing in the United States mail, at Reno, Nevada, postage prepaid, following ordinary business practices.

Facsimile (FAX).

Reno/Carson Messenger Service.

Fcderal Express or other overnight delivery.

Inner-ofllcemail following ordinary business practices.

Personal Del i very.

City Attorney's Ofllcc r.o. Box 1900 Reno, Nevada 89509

DATED this ,,'-'-'"'

ML Zachary Barker Coughlin 1471 E. 9th Street Reno,Ncvada 89512

Page 9: 2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of Appeal to Dist Ct

1

2

3

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

24

2 ' ,)

28

Case No, 11 CR 22176 21 FILED

Dept if OCT u 120\3 Reno MtJniRi~lCourt

CITY OF RENO, Plaintin;

vs. ORDER

ZACHARY BARKER COUGHLIN,

Defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin has filed a document entitled "Notice of Appeal

of November 30, 2011, Order Punishing Summary Contempt and Motion to Procced AP(sic) Waiving

Filing Fees and For Preparation of Transeript at Public Expense".

This motion was not typed but was prepared in cursive writing and filed. It is difficult

ifnot impossible for this court to follow and understand the Defendant's submission.

Further, the Motion is not accompanied by Points and Authorities or proof that it was

served on the opposing party, the Reno City Attorney. This is in violation of Reno Municipal Court

Rule 4.

Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Notice of Appeal and Motion arc DENIED.

Dated this 1 st day of October, 20 13.

:-;---+~~~-~'",''-' ;-'-=~~.--,---­Kenneth R. Howard, Judge Reno Municipal Court

Page 10: 2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of Appeal to Dist Ct

1

2

3

4

5

6

")

8

9

10

1]

,0 ,_/

14

IS

16

III

1 9

20

21

23

21

76

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to NRCI' S(b), I certi ly that I am an employce of the Reno Municipal Court,

Reno, Nevada, and that on this date I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document,

ORDER on the party(ies) set fDrth below:

Placing said document in a scaled envelope placed for collecting and mailing in the United States mail, at Reno, Nevada, postage prepaid, following ordinary business practices,

Facsimile (FAX).

Reno/Carson Messenger Service.

Federal Express or other overnight delivery.

[nncr-ofllcemail IDllowing ordinary business practices.

Personal Delivery.

City Attorney's Office P.O. Box 1900 Reno, Nevada 89509

Me Zachary Barker Coughlin 1471 E. 9th Street Reno, Nevada 89512

DATED this ~~[ ~ day of October, 2013.

Page 11: 2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of Appeal to Dist Ct

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Case No. 11 CR 22176 2I F\LED DEC t' 020\3"Y Dept. 4

CITY OF RENO,

lpal court

By --~~--~De~p~uW~~lee~~.

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF RENO

COUNTY OF WASHOE, ST ATE OF NEVADA

Plaintiff,

9 vs. ORDER

10 ZACHARY BARKER COUGHLIN,

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin has filed a document entitled "Request to S)lbmit

2/27/12 Motion for New Trial and Motion for Transfer to Mental Health Court".

Neither of the submitted motions were typed. It is difficult ifnot impossible for this

Court to follow and understand the Defendant's submissions.

Neither motion is accompanied with proof that they were served on the opposing party,

the Reno City Attorney. This is in violation of Reno Municipal Court Rule 4.

Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the "Request to Submit 2/27112 Motion for New Trial

and Motion for Transfer to Mental Health Court" are DENIED.

Dated this 10th day of December, 2013. 'Q a r&h~c--Kenneth R. Howard, Judge . Reno Municipal Court

Page 12: 2 5 14 Judge Howard Order Denying Mtn for New Trial, Violates NRS 189.010 Refuse Transmit Notice of Appeal to Dist Ct

1

2

4

6

8

9

10

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuanlto NRCP S(b), I certify that I am an cmployee of the Reno Municipal Court,

Reno, Nevada, and that on this datc I served a true and corrcc! copy of the foregoing document,

ORDER on the parly(ies) set forth below:

Placing said document in a sealed envelope placed for collecting and mailing in the United States mail, at Reno, Nevada, postage prepaid, following ordinary business practices.

facsimile (FAX).

Reno/Carson Messenger Service.

Fcderal Express or other overnight delivery.

Inner-ot1icemail following ordinary business practices.

Personal Delivery.

City Attorney's Ol1ice P.O. 130x 1900 Reno, Nevada 89509

DATED this --1.-l~,day

Mr. Zachary l3arker Cough I in c/o of Washoe County Jail Reno, Nevada