1st Shikoku JALT Conference Program

8
1 st All Shikoku JALT Conference Date: Saturday, May 29, 2010 (1:005:30) Venue: Kochi University, Media Library, 6 th Floor Sponsors: East Shikoku JALT & Matsuyama JALT Website: http://eng.core.kochitech.ac.jp/eastshikoku/ JALT Members and students: free OneDay Member Fee: 1000 yen

description

1st Shikoku JALT Conference Program

Transcript of 1st Shikoku JALT Conference Program

Page 1: 1st Shikoku JALT Conference Program

1st  All  Shikoku  JALT  Conference    Date:  Saturday,  May  29,  2010  (1:00-­‐5:30)  Venue:  Kochi  University,  Media  Library,  6th  Floor  Sponsors:  East  Shikoku  JALT  &  Matsuyama  JALT    Website:  http://eng.core.kochi-­‐tech.ac.jp/eastshikoku/  JALT  Members  and  students:  free  One-­‐Day  Member  Fee:  1000  yen    

 

Page 2: 1st Shikoku JALT Conference Program

1st All Shikoku JALT Conference Saturday, May 29, 2010 (1:00-5:30)

Kochi University, Media Library, 6th Floor

Program:

1:00-1:10 Welcome

1:10-2:00 Keynote Lecture (6F)

Ian Isemonger (Kumamoto University, JALT Journal Editor) In this keynote lecture, Ian Isemonger, JALT Journal Editor, discusses the state of the research trajectory in applied linguistics and the rapidly changing publishing environment in which this trajectory finds public expression. The lecture is primarily concerned with issues which pose a threat to the integrity of research in the area.

2:00-2:30 Featured Speakers (concurrent) (6F) Masahiro Nagasaki (Kochi University of Technology) Title: Changing EFL reading classrooms into “Reading Workshops” Reading workshops can change students to effective and lifelong readers (Rountas and Pinnell, 2001). In reading workshops, students read because they find it fun and meaningful. However, in EFL classrooms, students read because they are required to read. Research on integrating reading workshops into EFL is being implemented and results are positive. The students read more, for joy and with purpose. (2F) Harry Carley (Matsuyama University) Title: Team Teaching: The Total Team Team teaching is most commonly understood as two instructors sharing a class. The presenter will explain how TT actually stands for the ‘total team’. Who the members are on this total team will be examined and explained. Hopefully upon completion the listener will come away with a broader understanding of their position in the classroom and how they fit on the ‘total team’.

Concurrent presentation sessions:

2:30-3:00 (6F) Ian Willey Checking Native Checking (2F) Rudolf Reinelt Using Media in Rating 2nd FL Oral Examinations

3:00-3:30 (6F) Marcus Otlowski Establishing an Instructor-Learner Dialogue (2F) David Paterson “How Sweet the Sound? Pronunciation in Performance”

3:30-4:00 **BREAK**

4:00-4:30 (6F) Brett Milliner Effective Listening Assessment (2F) Daniel Ribble & Joanna Hare Techniques for Using Film in the Classroom

4:30-5:00 (6F) Jennie Milliner Learner Perceptions of Computer-assisted vs. Face-to-face Peer Feedback on Writing (2F) Paul Batten & Gerardine McCrohan Testing Communicative Compensatory Strategies

5:00-5:30 (6F) Jeremiah Mock The Insight Playshop™ Approach to Adult Learning

***********************************************************************************

5:30-6:00 Steering committee meeting: 2nd Shikoku JALT Conference (Matsuyama 2011)

6:30~ Party – Dandan Gikyo (段々桔梗) Myanmar/Japanese fusion, 4500 yen (drinks and food included)

Page 3: 1st Shikoku JALT Conference Program

Presentation  schedule  

Ian  Willey  (Kagawa  University)  Title:  Checking  native  checking  (2:30-­‐3:00, 6F  -­‐  University;  English  for  Specific  Purposes)  Many  Japanese  journals  require  "native  checks"  for  English  abstracts  accompanying  Japanese  submissions.  However,  native  checks  done  by  English  teachers  on  texts  produced  by  scientists  may  be  superficial  at  best,  harmful  at  worst.  The  presenter  will  describe  an  ongoing  study  that  seeks  to  identify  revision  strategies  utilized  by  checkers  when  editing  an  English  abstract,  and  points  where  checkers  feel  interaction  with  the  author  is  required.  Fifty  native  English  speakers  in  three  groups  (English  teachers  at  Japanese  universities;  people  working  outside  of  Japanese  universities;  and  people  with  healthcare  training)  were  asked  to  edit  two  abstracts  produced  by  a  Japanese  nursing  researcher.  Editorial  changes  were  then  categorized  from  a  cognitive  perspective.  Additional  data  was  collected  from  think-­‐aloud  sessions  and  post-­‐task  interviews.  Results  to  date  suggest  that  a  native  check  is  a  complicated  phenomenon  yielding  diverse  results  depending  on  who  does  the  checking.  Implications  for  English  teachers  working  at  Japanese  universities  will  be  discussed.  

Rudolf  Reinelt  (Ehime  University)  Title:  Using  Media  in  Rating  2nd  FL  Oral  Examinations  (2:30-­‐3:00, 2F  -­‐  University  2FL  Teaching;  Testing)  Based  on  the  language  needs  of  2FL  German  beginners,  the  presenter  conducts  courses  focusing  on  conversation,  but  also  integrating  other  language  skills.  The  final  oral  examination  of  the  course  is  rated,  simultaneously,  by  the  course  teacher  (presenter)  who  does  a  holistic  assessment,  and,  to  maintain  the  target  language  environment,  by  German  native  speaker  exchange  students  in  Japan  and  people  in  Germany  through  the  use  of  Skype.  This  method  of  oral  assessment  helps  to  address  the  shortage  in  second  foreign  language  native  speaker  raters.  The  presentation  will  demonstrate  a  trial  run  of  how  this  simultaneous  oral  rating  system  works  in  practice.  Advantages  and  problems  will  be  discussed,  and  suggestions  for  further  research  in  this  kind  of  testing  will  be  offered.  

Marcus  Otlowski  (Kochi  University)  Title:  Establishing  an  Instructor-­‐Learner  Dialogue  (3:00-­‐3:30, 6F  -­‐  University;  learner  feedback)  Feedback  is  an  essential  process  for  instructors  to  develop  and  improve  their  courses.  For  instructors  of  low-­‐level  learners,  the  most  commonly  used  feedback  instruments  can  require  a  degree  of  L2  competence  that  many  low-­‐level  learners  may  not  possess;  for  example,  learner  diaries  and  lengthy  personal  reflections.  These  instruments  may  not  be  the  most  effective  methods  for  obtaining  information  about  the  class,  the  learners  and  their  interaction  with  the  presented  materials.  Low-­‐level  learners  may  not  feel  comfortable  or  be  able  to  express  themselves  adequately  when  required  to  write  in  diaries  or  write  long  reflective  pieces.  This  presentation  reports  on  the  results  of  a  reflective  feedback  project  administered  to  English  Composition  classes  at  a  Japanese  university.  It  reports  on  how  this  short  reflective  feedback  instrument  provided  sufficient  information  to  make  adjustments  to  materials  and  instruction,  and  how  it  promoted  learners,  many  of  them  for  the  first  time,  to  reflect  upon  themselves  as  language  learners.  

David  Paterson:  (Matsuyama  University)  Title:  How  sweet  the  sound?  Pronunciation  in  performance  (3:00-­‐3:30, 2F  -­‐  University;  Speaking  &  Pronunciation)  With  reference  to  a  variety  of  examples,  from  speech  contest  entrants  to  professional  singers,  potential  difficulties  in  both  oral  production  (by  performers)  and  aural  comprehension  (by  listeners)  of  other  languages  will  be  examined.  Can  comparing  the  phonologies  of  both  first  and  target  languages  help  predict,  understand  and  attempt  to  overcome  such  barriers?  What  can  be  discovered  through  analysis  of  the  ways  in  which  song  lyrics  are  learnt  and  performed?  

3:30-4:00 **BREAK** 3:30-4:00

Page 4: 1st Shikoku JALT Conference Program

Brett  Milliner  (Kochi  University  &  Kochi  Women’s  University)  Title:  Effective  Listening  Assessment  (4:00-­‐4:30, 6F  -­‐  University  &  other;  Listening;  Language  Testing)  Unlike  the  other  English  macro  skills,  it  is  difficult  for  language  teachers  to  effectively  gauge  a  student’s  listening  ability.  After  a  brief  introduction  of  some  of  the  key  considerations  teachers  need  to  make  when  creating  language  tests,  an  evaluation  of  different  listening  tasks  will  be  presented  with  regard  to  validity  and  reliability.  This  presentation  aims  help  teachers  create  more  effective  listening  tasks  and  evaluations.  

Daniel  Ribble  &  Joanna  Hare  (Kochi  University)  Title:  Techniques  for  Using  Film  in  the  Classroom  (4:00-­‐4:30, 2F  -­‐  University;  motivation,  reading,  listening,  vocabulary)  Films  and  film  excerpts  provide  realistic  learning  experiences  and  are  good  sources  of  authentic  spoken  language.  We  hope  to  demonstrate  a  variety  of  activities  using  film  to  help  improve  reading,  pronunciation,  and  summarizing  skills  and  in  acquiring  collocations,  idioms,  and  specialized  vocabulary.  

Jennie  Milliner  (Kochi  University  &  Kochi  Women’s  University)  Title:  Learner  perceptions  of  computer-­‐assisted  vs.  face-­‐to-­‐face  peer  feedback  on  writing  (4:30-­‐5:00, 6F  -­‐  University;  Writing)  Peer  review  is  an  integral  part  of  the  process-­‐writing  classroom,  for  among  its  many  benefits,  it  can  increase  awareness  of  audience,  foster  collaborative  learning,  promote  ownership  of  text,  and  enable  students  to  learn  through  reviewing  their  peers’  work.  But  how  do  learners  feel  about  the  peer  review  process?  This  paper  presents  a  study  on  Japanese  EFL  students’  perceptions  of  face-­‐to-­‐face  and  computer-­‐assisted  peer  review.  Research  will  be  presented  in  the  context  of  previous  studies  concerning  the  influence  of  cultural  attitudes  on  peer  feedback  as  well  as  traditional  versus  computer-­‐assisted  peer  review.  Analysis  will  be  made  of  the  ways  in  which  learners  respond  to  both  modes  of  peer  feedback  in  order  to  explore  the  pedagogical  implications  for  the  Japanese  EFL  classroom.  

Paul  Batten  &  Gerardine  McCrohan  (Kagawa  University)  Title:  Testing  Communicative  Compensatory  Strategies  (4:30-­‐5:00, 2F  -­‐  University,  junior  high  and  high  school;  communicative  strategies,  testing)  Improving  students’  communicative  competence  is  usually  an  aim  of  many,  if  not  most,  EFL  teachers  and  researchers.  We  as  teachers  recognize  that  students  learning  a  second  language  need  to  develop  communicative  strategies  to  help  them  overcome  or  compensate  for  the  inevitable  breakdowns  in  communication.  This  presentation  introduces  the  tools  students  need  to  interrupt,  ask  questions,  give  verbal  and  non-­‐verbal  signs  they  did  or  didn’t  understand,  to  ask  questions  for  meaning,  and  to  rephrase  and  describe  vocabulary.  Testing  these  skills  presents  a  problem  for  many  teachers.  We  will  describe  our  testing  methodology,  an  approach  in  which  students  must  interact  with  the  examiner  using  the  strategies  studied  to  be  successful.  We  will  also  present  some  pre-­‐  and  post-­‐course  data  showing  students’  improvement  over  the  course.  

Jeremiah  Mock  (Kochi  University  &  Kochi  Women’s  University)  Title:  The  Insight  PlayshopTM  Approach  to  Adult  Learning  (5:00-­‐5:30,  6F  -­‐  University;  Active  learning,  Educational  philosophy)  Play  is  the  lifeblood  of  learning.  In  children,  we  see  how  play  and  learning  are  deeply  intertwined.  Adults,  like  the  children  they  once  were,  discover  and  retain  more  when  learning  is  fun.  Of  course,  adult  learning  often  requires  effort,  but  the  dominant  Fordist  (manufacturing)  model  of  undergraduate  education  worldwide  emphasizes  arduous  work  rather  than  playing  hard.  The  Insight  PlayshopTM  approach  emphasizes  creating  action-­‐filled  play-­‐with-­‐intention  experiences.  This  methodology  invites  "teachers"  to  become  learning  facilitators  who  design  purposeful  play-­‐based  experiences  that  spark  co-­‐learners'  curiosity,  imagination  and  creativity.  Through  active  play-­‐with-­‐intention,  learners  can  gain  insights  about  culture,  language,  everyday  life,  values,  relationships,  nature,  metaphysics,  etc.  This  session  will  invite  participants  to  try  a  play-­‐with-­‐intension  activity  designed  to  awaken  thinking  and  promote  transformation.  

 

Page 5: 1st Shikoku JALT Conference Program

Access  information:  

1.  Kochi  University    

 

 

2.  Kochi  University  -­‐  Media  Mori  Library  Building  

Just  under  the  campus  palm  trees…       ...you  will  find  the  Media-­‐no-­‐mori  

                                                                                                             

                               

 

3.  Dinner  party  location  

       

For  participants  arriving  by  expressway,  the  Ino  IC  exit  is  nearest  the  campus.  The  main  entrance  to  Kochi  University  is  on  the  Roman  densha  streetcar  line.  Parking  is  free  on  campus.  

Dandan  Gikyo  is  a  1-­‐minute  walk  south  of  the  main  Harimayabashi  intersection  at  the  center  of  Kochi  City.  One  block  south  of  the  Shikoku  Bank  main  branch,  you  will  see  a  Family  Mart  convenience  store.  Turn  right  (west)  there,  and  you  will  find  段々桔梗  at  the  first  corner.  

段々桔梗 (だんだんぎきょう) 高知市南はりまや町1-2-11 東南アジア料理, ミャンマー料理 , 鳥料理

088-824-3888  

Page 6: 1st Shikoku JALT Conference Program

Notes:    

Page 7: 1st Shikoku JALT Conference Program

Notes:  

Page 8: 1st Shikoku JALT Conference Program

                                                                           

 

 

JALT2010  Conference  info:  The  36th  Annual  International  Conference  on  Language  Teaching  and  Learning  19–22  November,  2010    (Aichi  Industry  and  Labor  Center,  Nagoya)  

 

 

 

 East  Shikoku  JALT  Officers:    Darren  Lingley,  Kochi  University  (President)  [email protected]­‐u.ac.jp  (090-­‐9554-­‐9446)  Lawrie  Hunter,  Kochi  University  of  Technology  (Program  Chair)  lawrie_hunter@kochi-­‐tech.ac.jp  Marcus  Otlowski,  Kochi  University  (Treasurer)  [email protected]­‐u.ac.jp  (090-­‐6282-­‐9339)  Takahiro  Ioroi,  Kochi  Women’s  University  (Publicity  Chair)  [email protected]­‐wu.ac.jp  David  Grant,  Kochi  National  College  of  Technology  (Membership  Chair)  [email protected]­‐ct.ac.jp    Paul  Daniels,  Kochi  University  of  Technology  (Website  Editor)  daniels.paul@kochi-­‐tech.ac.jp         Matsuyama  JALT  Officers:  

Kiyoshi  Shioiri  (Chapter  President)                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Kiyomi  Tamai  (Membership  Chair)                                                                                                                                                                                                                            John  Garras  (Program  Chair)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Junko  Yamamoto  (Publicity  Chair)                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Jaehee  Ryu  (Treasurer)    

Join  JALT  here:  http://jalt.org/main/membership