1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 Future Options Matthias Liepe.
-
Upload
candace-tate -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 Future Options Matthias Liepe.
1Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
Future Options Future Options
Matthias Liepe
2Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
Outline
• Options for cost reduction
• SRF Cavities and higher Q0
• Microphonics, RF Power and Input Couplers
• HOM damping– Waveguide HOM damping
– Beam-line absorber
• Cryomodule Simplifications
3Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
Options for cost reduction
Parameter old new change [%] change [%]
Q0 2.0E+10 3.0E+10 -4.1 -13.8
loaded Q 6.5E+07 1.0E+08 -2.5 -13.4
module cost 100% 80% -6.7 0
fill factor 49% 55% -0.8 0
total -14% -27%
• “Baseline layout” should work well, but
• reduction in construction and operating costoperating cost is desirable
• Need to balance lower cost against increased risk
• ExamplesExamples of parameter tuning/optimization:
Cost of cryo-plant
(power)0.4
4Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
SRF Cavities and higher Q0• Cavities account for 30% of cryomodule
cost!– keep end groups simple: “the end groups (beam
pipe, input coupler port, HOM couplers, flanges, transition to LHe container) cost a much as the 9-cells alone.” (D. Proch, COST REDUCTION IN CAVITY FABRICATION)
• Q0=3· 1010 at T=1.8K:– 9 n surface resistance gives Q0=3· 1010
– At 1.8 K with 120C bake: RBCS=3 n need <6 n residual resistance
– Very good magnetic shielding required (<15 mOe)
– This has been achieved in vertical tests
5Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
Q0=3· 10 10 at T=1.8K
• Such Q-values have been demonstrated in vertical cavity tests, but not in linacs
• Issues: shielding, FE
16.2 MV/m
R&D program for high Q0
– High Q R&D program– Daresbury / Cornell /
LBNL Test Module– Main linac test module– Main linac module
6Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
Microphonics and RF Power for QQLL=10=10
88
<600 W at 12.3 MV/m
<1 kW<1 kW at 16.2 MV/m!
11
1
2
2
22
3
3
33
4
pe
ak d
etu
nin
g [
Hz]
gradient [MV/m]10 15 20 250
10
20
30
40
50
60 For peak detuning <10Hz:•QL,opt = 108
•P < 2kW sufficient!
•We have demonstrated this at the JLAB FEL:
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
time [sec]klys
tron
pow
er [
kW]
5.5 mA4 mA2.5 mA0 mA
7-cell cavity
7Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
2kW RF System (R&D required!)
• Solid state amplifiers become an alternative to IOTs– Simpler, require less space in tunnel– 40% overall efficiency is feasible (R&D itemR&D item!) – Similar cost at kW power level, further reduction in cost
likely
• Power RF cables instead of waveguides– Require less space in tunnel
– Much simpler input couplersMuch simpler input couplers (similar to the once used in vertical cavity tests) and coupler ports at vacuum vessels
7/16 DIN
7/8" Foam Heliax
2kW cw RF amp Coax input coupler
8Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
HOM Damping Alternative I:Waveguide HOM Damping
Scheme• Similar to JLAB 1 A plans
• 6 HOM waveguides per cavity (with integrated fundamental mode input coupler)
• Design / optimization under progress…
• High Q0 requires relative long superconducting niobium waveguide sections
• Mechanical / thermal design needs to be worked out
9Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
Waveguide HOM Damping Simulations
• Cell shape optimized for high R/Q*G
• 85º wall angle
• Fill factor: 59%
85º
•Length of beam tubes and Nb section of waveguides adjusted for sufficient attenuation of fundamental mode (-40dB)
Niobium section of waveguide
10Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
First HOM Damping Simulation Results
• Level of damping very similar to damping with beam line HOM absorbers
Brillouin diagram
Valery Shemelin
11Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
HOM Damping Alternative II:Simplified HOM Beam Line
Absorber
• Fewer absorber tiles• Fewer parts overall • Reduced length fill factor
increases by 4% to 53%• 2 instead of 3 types of materials?
12Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
Simplified HOM Beam Line Absorber: ANSYS Results
• HOM load allows for 2mm longitudinal length change from cool-down and cavity tuning
1mm longitudinal from F=1kN Thermal Atmospheric pressure
13Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
Simplified HOM Beam Line Absorber: CLANS HOM
Damping Results
Similar level of HOM damping
2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 500010
1
102
103
104
frequency [MHz]
Q
box HOM loadflat load
Monopoles
14Matthias Liepe August 2, 2007
Cryomodule Simplifications
• No coaxial coupler ports (only feed-thoughts for power RF cables)
– No precise machining of ports required
– Cavities are free to move longitudinal during cool down Can use simple, fixed cavity support without breaking
the HGRP into sections
• Simplified thermal shield and outer magnetic shield
• Tolerances on many parts can be relaxed
• More items: see Eric’s talk