1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed
-
Upload
renz-cerillo -
Category
Documents
-
view
115 -
download
0
Transcript of 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed
![Page 1: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Debating On the Art of
Renz Homer E. Cerillo
![Page 2: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What is a Debate?
![Page 3: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
a formal and structured discussion on a particular topic… in which
opposing arguments are put forward.
![Page 4: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Debates’ Elements
Motions Arguments
Adjudicator Debaters
![Page 5: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Why debate?
![Page 6: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What are motions? Motions are essentially the topics being debated upon. They may
range from social issues to science, and economics to showbiz.
Ex: (1) This house believes that Justin Bieber is awesome.
Ex: (2) This house would ban One Direction in the Philippines.
![Page 7: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Two types of motion 1. Value Judgment
2. Policy
Assesses whether a certain subject/person/event/act is good or bad, moral or immoral,
or true or false. AKA Principle Debate.
Calls for an action or something to be done and debated in such way that it solves a
problem in the present scenario.
![Page 8: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
examples 1. Value Judgment
2. Policy
(1) This house believes that academic performance is the best indicator of individual success in life. (2) This house celebrates hyper consumerism. (3) This house believes in marriage.
(1) This house would legalize prostitution. (2) This house would expel cheaters in
school examinations. (3) This house would arm journalists.
![Page 9: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Value Judgment Policy
(1) This house prefers technocracy than democracy
(1) This house would shift to technocracy
(2) This house regrets joining Facebook
(2) This house would dissolve Facebook
(3) This house believes that belief in Santa Claus is good for children.
(3) This house would ban stories related to Santa Claus.
![Page 10: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Value Judgment Policy
(4) This house believes that children should be raised without the concept of gender
(4) This house would raise children without the concept of gender
(5) This house believes that Alice has no obligation to obey the laws of Wonderland
(5) This house would mandate Alice to obey the laws of Wonderland
![Page 11: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Parliamentary Debating General Guidelines: • Speeches should be seven minutes long. (Until 7 minutes and 30 seconds)
• A bell/clap will be sounded at the first minute to signal that POI’s (Point of Information) may now be taken.
• Another bell/clap will be sounded at the end of the 6th minute to signal the end of POIs.
• Successive bells/claps would be sounded at the end of the 7th minute to signal that the speech must be ended.
![Page 12: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Parliamentary Debating
1st 2nd to 6th 7th
POI’s (Points of Information) may be entertained within
7.15
7.30
Ting Ting
Ting Ting Ting
1 Clap
2 Claps 1
Clap
Multiple Claps
General Guidelines:
![Page 13: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Parliamentary Debating: • You may accept 1 or 2 POI’s.
• Madame/Mister Speaker or Madame/Mister Chair may be used to address the chief adjudicator.
• POI’s must only be 15 seconds long.
• Speakers must observe decorum. Foul language is not allowed.
• Rebuttals are crucial to your speech.
General Guidelines:
![Page 14: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Parliamentary Debating: • Preparation Time (PrepTime) is 30 minutes
• Use of electronic devices is not allowed during prep time
• Only printed materials are permitted
• An odd number of adjudicators are to assess the debate
• Props (for crying out loud) will only make you look silly
General Guidelines:
![Page 15: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Debate Formats
British Parliamentary Debate
Asian Parliamentary
Debate
![Page 16: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Asian Parliamentary Debate
![Page 17: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Asian Parliamentary Debate: General Guidelines • There are two (2) opposing teams.
• Government/Affirmative Side • Opposition/Negative Side
• Each team has three members.
• Prime Minister (PM) • Deputy Prime Minister (DPM) • Government Whip (GW)
• Leader of the Opposition (LO) • Deputy Leader of the Opposition (DLO) • Opposition Whip (OW)
![Page 18: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Order of Speakers
(1) Prime Minister (PM)
(3) Deputy Prime Minister (DPM)
(5) Government Whip (GW)
(8) Government Whip
(2) Leader of the Opposition (LO)
(4) Deputy Leader of the Opposition (DLO)
(6) Opposition Whip (OW)
(7) Opposition Reply
![Page 19: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Speaker Roles • Informative backgrounder/ Definition
• Characterization of the problem
• Proposal (in policy debates) or value-judgment (in principle debates)
Prime Minister (PM)
• Components of the proposal/prongs • Standards • Goal
• Parameters • Discussion of the constructives/arguments (2-3)
![Page 20: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Speaker Roles • Explicit statement of the clash
• General defense of the opposition
• Comments on the definition, standards, goal, and parameters
Leader of the Opposition (LO)
• Rebuttals
• Discussion of the constructives/arguments (2-3)
![Page 21: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Speaker Roles • Furthering of team’s argumentation/ extension speech
• Rebuilding of team’s case
• More rebuttals
Deputy Prime Minister (DPM)
• Discussion of the constructives/arguments (2-3)
![Page 22: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Speaker Roles • Furthering of team’s argumentation/ extension speech
• Rebuilding of team’s case
• More rebuttals
Deputy Leader of the Opposition (DLO)
• Discussion of the constructives/arguments (2-3)
![Page 23: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Speaker Roles • Sum up your team line
• Rebut the entire opposition bench
• Provide fresh analyses for your side of the house
Government Whip (GW)
• Fresh analyses are new points of view on how to defend a discussed argument or rebuttal in the debate
• F.A. is a technique to strengthen the argument, not to bring up new matter • Sort arguments into issues
![Page 24: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Speaker Roles • Sum up your team line
• Rebut the entire government bench
• Provide fresh analyses for your side of the house
Opposition Whip (GW)
• Fresh analyses are new points of view on how to defend a discussed argument or rebuttal in the debate
• F.A. is a technique to strengthen the argument, not to bring up new matter
• Sort arguments into issues
![Page 25: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Reply Speech • 4 minutes only (overtime of 15-30 seconds)
• May be given by the first two speakers of the benches.
• Comparison of two sides’ strengths and weaknesses.
Reply Speech
• Biased claim as to why the adjudicators go with your side.
• Reply speakers propose criteria e.g. clarity, depth of argumentation, as a means to convince that their side win the debate.
![Page 26: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Reply Speech • No prescribed structure for reply speech
• Structure it depending on your preference
• R.S. is designed to be a simple and brief overview of the entire debate
Reply Speech
• Be direct/straightforward
![Page 27: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Defining the motion
![Page 28: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Definition • Explicit clarification on what the debate is going to be about
• Done by the first speaker of the affirmative
• A team can define the debate in any way they choose and it is up to the other teams in the debate to question their approach
Definition
• Establishment of parameters or context
• May be challenged by the first speaker of the negative
![Page 29: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Guidelines for defining • Define terms in the topic, not every
single word
E.G. This house would subsidize Twitter
• Do not make definitions too complicated
Definition
• Be direct/straightforward
E.G. THBT cosmetic products are empowering for women
![Page 30: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Grounds: Definitional Challenge Limiting the debate in inappropriate time and place contexts
Time and Place Setting
Tautology
-An argument that is true by logic -Regardless of opinion, you cannot possibly argue against it
E.g. This house would legalize monogamy The affirmative sets it in the Philippines.
E.g. We limit this debate in the 1930’s.
![Page 31: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Grounds: Definitional Challenge -An argument that you cannot be expected to oppose (as opposed to a tautology which is impossible to oppose)
Truism
Squirrel
-A definition from the side of the opening speaker that makes it too easy for his/her side
E.g. THBT Pnoy has failed the Philippines
-E.g. This house would dissolve the police Defined as the band.
Did not succeed in implementing all his platforms
![Page 32: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Grounds: Definitional Challenge Ex. This house believes that big is good.
Open Motion
May be challenged once definition is too far-fetched
![Page 33: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Definitional Challenge • State explicitly that you’re challenging your opponent’s definition
• Explain why their definition is wrong
• Replace their definition with your own definition
How to Mount a Definitional Challenge
• Explain how your definition avoids the problem of your opposition’s definition
![Page 34: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
The Clash
![Page 35: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
The Clash • The exact opposite of the government’s team line of argumentation
• Provided by the first speaker of the negative
• Always strive for the hard line clash
What is the Clash?
E.g. This house would assassinate present day dictators in office because blah blah
The clash: This house would not assassinate present day dictators in office. In fact, this side would provide complete protection etc.
![Page 36: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
What is an argument?
![Page 37: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading
others that an action or idea is right or wrong
![Page 38: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Anatomy of an argument
A. Label
B. Premise
Basic structure:
C. Analysis
D. Examples
E. Tieback
![Page 39: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Anatomy of an argument -Short simple statement on what your argument is about; for reference
Label
Premise
-Main basis for an argument -An assertion for a proposition
Analysis
-Theoretical or abstract explanation of how and why your argument is true and should stand; So what?
![Page 40: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Anatomy of an argument -Simplest and most popular form of substantiation -Help to convince audience and adjudicators that your argument is actually true
Examples
Tieback
-Answers the question “What’s the main point of this argument?” -Important to indicate that you’re ending an argument
![Page 41: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Weaknesses of an argument?
![Page 42: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Weaknesses of an argument -Arguments must be consistent with one another and with your team’s line of defense. -Can damage team’s credibility
Inconsistency
Insignificance
-Arguments must be related to the topic (DUH), what’s their purpose if they don’t connect at all.
![Page 43: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Weaknesses of an argument -Arguments must be tailored to the debate and your defense
Too Broad/General
Irrelevance
-Arguments must be related to the topic (DUH), what’s their purpose if they don’t connect at all.
Dependent Argument
-Too thin on its own; lacks analysis and examples
![Page 44: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
What is a Rebuttal?
![Page 45: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
a refutation or contradiction
![Page 46: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Importance of rebuttals -Two contradicting arguments/ideas do not make a debate
Rebuttals
-Rebuttals allow for interaction between the two houses
-Rebuttals are as valuable as constructive arguments
-They are essentially pointing out the differences between your arguments and your opponents’
![Page 47: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Grounds for Rebuttals Logical Irrelevance
Insignificance
Technique of Concession
Factual Inaccuracy
Underlying Assertions
Contradictions
Pointing out a
Misrepresentation
![Page 48: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
General rebuttal tips • Know how much rebuttal to do
• Listen carefully to opponents’ arguments, little details are crucial
• Save nothing for later, hit them as hard as you can
Rebuttals
• Combine accurate criticisms of your opponent, with references to your own team’s case
• Deny then what if
![Page 49: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
What is a POI?
![Page 50: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Point of Information • 15-second long question, clarification, rebuttal coming from the other side of the house.
• May be entertained starting from the 2nd minute until the end of the 6th minute.
• Speaking debater may or may not entertain a POI raised by the other side.
Point of Information
• Should the debater raising the POI exceeds the 15-minute mark, he or she will be cut off (out of order) by the adjudicator/s.
![Page 51: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Who wins?
![Page 52: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
The Adjudication • Basically the judges of the debate, • Assumes the view of a “disinterested average reasonable person”
Range
Adjudicators
Description
80-83 Really excellent speeches
77-79 More strong points that weak points
74-76 Average
71-73 More weak points than strong points
67-70 Bad/Messy speech
![Page 53: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Criteria for Judging -Presence, diction, gestures etc.
Manner
Matter
-Evidences, depth of analysis, argumentation etc.
Method
-Structure, clarity
![Page 54: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Other debating Tips -Structure is one essential key to an effective speech; signposts are labels e.g. I have three arguments for this debate e.g. Let me proceed to my last and second argument
Signposting
Matterload
-A jargon that means to acquire as much knowledge/information on anything under the sun; Read read read
![Page 55: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Other debating Tips -There’s no better way to enhance your debating skills than though debating per se
-Ask for personal adjudication from the adjudicators after every debate round
-Be confident and engage your audience
-Record your speech to listen for loopholes and weak spots
Train
![Page 56: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Other debating Tips
HAVE
FUN!!!
![Page 57: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Case Building THW ban all procedures to alter
one’s appearance
Prime Minister
Background: existence procedures e.g. surgeries, that alter one’s physical form, people could opt to access such procedures
Problem: Dominance of the white culture, people conform to such culture
Solution: The government would ban all procedures (a) invasive eg. all surgeries and (b) non-invasive whitening products etc.
![Page 58: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Case Building Goal: The goal of the debate is to address racism in the long term, where are people who will undergo such procedures better off
Argument 1: When does the government act?
Argument 2: Race based discrimination
Argument 3: The government has to send a message
We are very proud to propose!
![Page 59: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Case Building Leader of the Opposition
Clash: Would not ban any procedure, we fully support, lower the cost and subsidize such procedures
Team Defense: The government has no right to impinge on your personal choice.
Rebuttal 1: Not everyone subscribe to the white culture
Rebuttal 2: There is no large group harm
![Page 60: 1AsianParliamentaryDebateProcedure_RenzCerillo.compressed](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030316/587a8a071a28ab58288b5735/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Case Building Leader of the Opposition
Argument 1: You have the right to choose your racial features
Argument 2: The policy is not justified; the government has no right to deny you the right to a good life
Argument 3: Catering to the minorities. Racial dysphoria and psychologically depressed people.
The policy should fail!