1994_SASSI System Software Configuration

8/3/2019 1994_SASSI System Software Configuration

1/43

61410. E aENGINEERING CHANGE N OTICE ..............................Supplementa1Direct Revision txlChange ECNTemporarySupersedureCancel/Void

12. Description o f ChangeInstallation o f SASS1 at LANL, validation testing.

[ I[ I

EnvironmentalDesign Er or/Omi ssi n

[ I[ I

13a. Jus tif ic ati on Cr it er ia Change [ I Design Improvement(mark one)As - Found [x ] Feci i t a t e Const. [ ] Const. Error/Cinission13b. J ust i f ica t ion Detai l sInstallation at L A N L replaces RL Cray installation. RL Cray was removed 12-93.

14. D istr ibu t ion ( include name, W I N , and no. o f copies) RELEASE STAMPSee distribution page

A-7900-013-2 ( 0 6 / 94 ) GEF095


2/43

1. ECN (use no. from pg. 1)Page 2 of 2 614102NGINEERING CHA NGE NOTICE

15. Design 16. Cost Inpact 17. Schedule Impact (days)ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTIONer i f icat ionRequired [ I[ I

ImprovementDelay[ I $[ I $

Addit ionalSavings

that w i l l be affected by the change described i n Block 12.

[ I $[ I fA d d i t i na1Savi ngs11 YesEx1 No

18. Change Impact Review: Ind ica te the rel at ed docunents (o ther than the engineering docunents i de nt if ie d on Side 1)Enter the affected docunent nunber i n Block 19.SDD/DDFunctional Design CriteriaOperating Sp ecif ic ationC r i t i ca l i t y Spec i fi ca tion

Conceptual Design ReportEquipment Spec.Const. Spec.Procurement Spec.Vendor InformationOn ManualFSAR /SARSafety Equipnent ListRadiation Work PermitEnvironmental ImpactStatementEnvironmental ReportEnvironmental Permit

Seismic/Stress AnalysisS t ess/Desi gn ReportInterface Control DrawingCalibration Procedure

Installat ion ProcedureUaintenance ProcedureEngineering ProcedureOperating InstructionOperating ProcedureOperational SafetyRequirementIEFD DrawingCell Arrangement DrawingEssential MaterialSpecif icat ionFac. Proc. Samp. ScheduleInspection PlanInven tory Adjustment

Tank Calibration ManualHealth PhysicsProcedureSpares Mul t ip le UnitL i s t i n gTestProcedures/SpecificationComponent IndexASME C o d e d I t e mHunan FactorConsiderationComputer SoftwareE lec t r i c C i r cu i tSc hedu 1eICRS ProcedureProcess ControlManual/PlanProcess Flow ChartPurchase Requ isi tio nT ick le r F i l e

RequestJ19. Other Af fe ct ed Docunents: (NOTE: Docunents l i s te d below w i l l not be revised by t h i s ECN.) Signatures belowindic ate t hat the signin g organizatio n has been not if ie d of other af fected documents li st ed below.

Document Nunber/Revision D o c w n t Nunber/Revision Docunent Number RevisionAA

20 . Approvals3PERATIONS AND ENGINEERING ARCHITECT-ENGINEER

Signa ture Date Signature DateCog. Eng. EO WeinerCog. Mgr. TJ Conrads3A ML HermasonSafety JC van KeurenEnvi ron.3ther

Environ.Other

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYSignature or a Control Number thattracks the Approval SignatureADDITIONAL

A-7900-013-3 (06/94) GEFO96


3/43

DISCLAIMER

Portions of this document may be illegiblein electronic image products. Images areproduced from the best available originaldocument.


4/43

RELEASE AUTHORIZATION

Docum ent Number: WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036, R E V . 1Document Title: S A S S 1 System Sof tware Co nf ig ur at io nRelease Date: 9/30/94

* * * * * * * * * * * * *This document was reviewed following the

procedures described in WHC-CM-3-4 and is :APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

* * * * * * * * * * * * *~~

WHC Informa tion Release Adm inistration Specialist:

- N.L. SOLIS(Signature) (Date) I

A-6001-400 ( 0 7 / 9 4 ) UEF256


5/43

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT I 1. Total Pages 362. T i t l eSASSI System Software Configuration5. Key Wordssoftware, configuration, SASSI, seismic

3. Wunber 1 4. RevlNo.WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-300366. AuthorNW:EO WeinerS i gnatureOrganization/Charge Code 8D440/D8023

/T h i s document demonstra tes compl iance of the SASSI soil-structure interactioncomputer program w i WHC- CM-3 -10RELEASE STAMP

OFFlCiAL RELEASE f&-'WISCLAIMER - This report was prepared as an account of worksponsored by an agency of t he United Sta tes Goverrment. Nei the r theU n i t e d Sta tes Goverrment nor any agency the reof , nor any of t he i remployees, no r any o f th ei r contractors, subcontractors or th ei remployees, makes any warranty, express or im p l i ed , or assunes anylegal Li ab il i t y or re spons ibil i ty fo r the accuracy, completeness, orany th i r d party 's use or t he resu lts of such use of any information,apparatus, -product, or process disclosed, or represents that i t s useuould not infr inge pr ivately owned rig hts. Reference here in t o anysp ec if ic comnercial product, process, or servi ce by trade name,trademark, manufacturer, or otheru ise, does not nec ess ari lycons t i tu te o r imply i t s endorsement, recomnendation, or fa vor ing bythe Unit ed States Goverrment o r any agency thereof or i t scont ract ors or subcontractors. The views and opinio ns of authorsexpressed herein do not necessarily sta te or re fl ec t those of theUnited States Goverrment or any agency thereof.

BY WWCDATE SEP

9. Impact Level SQ

A-6400-073 (11/91) C E O UEF124


6/43

(1) Document NunberRECORD OF REVISION WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Page )

A-7320-005 (08/91) UEF168


7/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page i

SASS1 System Software Configuration

August 1994

Prepared by: EO We1 nerStructural Assessments

/SECC

Facility Stress Analysis

Approved by:Stkuct ral Assessments Date

Westinghouse Hanford CompanyHanford Operations and Engineering Contractorfor the Department o f Energy


8/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1P a g e ii

T A B L E OF CONTENTSI N T R O D U C T I O NI M P A C T L E V E LDOCUMENTATIONSOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PLANV E R I F I C A T I O NV A L I D A T I O NCONVERSIONCO NF IG UR AT ION FPANAGEMENTREV IS O N SREFERENCES

578


9/43

w i.C C c 5 D - Gd CS WB - 3DO3 6* *8 e V .


10/43

Document Rev1 eued

w H c - S P - GN- CS WP - 3 O Of e v t ITYPICAL CHECKLIST FOR INDEPENDEW REVIEW

Y e s - o[ Jf [ 1 [ 1 Problem completely defined.[ J ] [ ] [ ] Necessary assumptions explicitly stated and supported,[ /i [ 1 [ 1 Computer codes and data ffles documented,[ [ 1 [ 1 Data used inAc alculations explicitly stated in document.[ [ 1 1 1 Data checked for consistency with original source

J&ri/Lwi& v-.

information as applicable.[ 1 [ 1 [ 41[ -d 1 I 1 Models approprqate and used within range o f valfdlty or use

Mathematical derfvations checked Including dimensionalconsistenc o f results.o u t s i d rang e of established validity justifjed,

[ ~ l i f t & L n %)&)

1 [ 1 [ Hand calculations checked for errors,[ A 1 1 [ I Code run streams correct and consistent w i th analysis. documentation.[ Jf [ 1 [ I Code output consistent with input and with results reported[d 1 [ 1 Ac c e p t a b i l i t y limits on analytica1,results applicable and[ 1 [ 1 I --/afety margins consistent wf th good e ngineering practices,1-4 [ 1 [ 1 Conclusions Consistent wfth analytical results andI/f[ [ 1

i n analysls documentatjon.

supported. L i m i t s checked against sources,


11/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page 1

SASSI System Software ConfigurationEO Wei nerAugust 1994

INTRODUCTIONThe SASSI (System for Analysis for Soil-Structure Interaction) computerprogram was obtained by WHC from the University of California at Berkeley forseismic structural analysis of complex embedded building configurations.SASSI was developed in the 1980's by a team of doctoral students under thedirection of Prof. J. Lysmer. The program treats three-dimensionalsoil-structure interaction problems with the flexible volume substructuringmethod. In the 1 9 7 0 ' ~ ~he same organization developed the FLUSH program,which has achieved widespread international usage in the seismic analysis o fstructures.separate execution.SASSI consists of nine modules, each o f which are to be run as aThe SASSI source code, dated 1989 and identified as a Cray version, was put u pon the RL Cray XMP/232 Unicos system in 1991.end of 1993, and SASSI is now installed on the LANL Cray YMP systems.That system was removed at theSHAKE is a much simpler program that solves the free-field soil problem byiteration with strai n-dependent soi properties. Current practice uses SHAKE-derived soil properties as fixed input to SASSI. The SHAKE PC version wasobtained from the Earthquake Engineering Research Center (EERC), University ofCalifornia, Berkeley, in 1990. It was installed on an 80386 PC and the RLCray, and it is included with the SASSI configuration. An updated version,SHAKE91, was obtained in April 1994 from the same source. Both SHAKE andSHAKE91 have been installed on a 486 PC, the SECC sgi3 workstation, and theLANL Cray YMP systems.A short auxiliary program HOUSEPLT was written to translate the SASSI. HOUSEmodule input to ANSYS version 5.0 (ANSYS 1993) PREP7 input suitable for meshplotting.model that i s not otherwise possible.were written to limit unneeded volumes of output from ANALYS, HOUSE, STRESSand MOTION.

This enables th e engineer to obtain a graphic representation of hisFilters TRFILTER, HFILTER and SMFILTER

The purpose of this document i s to demonstrate compliance with WHC-CM-3-10(WHC 1993).


12/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page 2IMPACT LEVELImpact level 2 was prev iou sly assigne d t o SASSI.a p p r o p r i a t e 1eve1 . SQ i s c o n s i d e r e d t h e c u r r e n tDOCUMENTATION

SASSI: User manual (Lysmer 1991)SHAKE: User manual (Schnabel 1972)

Theoret ica l manuals (Lysmer 1981, Bechtel 1991)Va lida t ion manual (Bechte l 1990)SHAKE91: User manual ( I d r i ss 1992)HOUSEPLT: Appendix A

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PLANSASSI was developed a t t h e Un ive rs i ty o f C a l i fo rn ia ove r the 1979-1989t imeframe, and i t i s of f - th e -sh e l f so f tware . The th eo re t i ca l manua ls p rov idedevelopment informat ion.VERIFICATIOND e s i g n v e r i f i c a t i o n i s cons ide red a s conduc ted by the deve lope rs dur ing thedevelopment process.development .VALIDATION

SASSI i s o f f - t h e- s h e l f s o f tw a r e o b t a in e d a f t e r

A v a l i d a t i o n r e p o r t ( B e c h t e l 1990) was made available by Savannah River Site( S R S ) p e r so n n e l. I t i s organ ized i n to e igh tee n example problems, each ofwhich may be broken down in t o se ve ra l c as es .b r i e f l y a s f o l l o w s . The examples are descr ibed

Example Descr ipt ion123456789

10

F r e e - f i el d a n a l y s i s o f h a l f s p a c e ; v e r t i c a l l y p r op a g at in gSP and P waves.Containment building model w i t h bricks and beams; usesCOMBIN.R ig id d i s k on s u r f a c e s u b j e c t e d t o a t r a p e z o i d a l p u l s e .Impedances f o r c i r c u la r founda t ion on l aye r ed soil system.S c a t t e r i n g r e s p o n s e o f a r i g i d m a s s le s s c y l i n d e r f u l l y e mbedded ;su bje c te d t o v er t i ca l SV-wave and ho r izo nta l SH-wave.S u r f a c e f o u n d a t i o n c o n s i s t i n g o f b o t h r i g i d a n d f l e x i b l ecomponents.S c a t t e r i n g r e s p o n s e o f an embedded massless r igid cubew i t h an inc l ined wave.S e r i e s o f simple p r o b l e m s u s i n g c u r r e n t l y a v a i l a b l ee lement s . Di sp lacement so lu t ions .S e r i e s o f simple p r o b l e m s u s i n g c u r r e n t l y a v a i l a b l ee le m e nt s. S t r e s s s o l u t i o n s .Coupled bu i ld ing ana lys i s , two d imens iona l .


13/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page 31112131415161718

S c a t t e r i n g r es p on s e o f a r i g i d m a s sl e ss c y l i n d e r f u l l yembedded i n a la ye re d sys tem.Impedance response of a r i g i d f u l l y em bedded c y1 i n d e r .F l e x i b l e p l a t e on s u r f a c e s u b j e c t e d t o ma ch in er y l o a d s .C om plian ce f u n c t i o n s o f a s t r i p f o o t i n g on t h e s u r f a c e o fa v i s c o e l a s t i c h a l f s p a c e and a l a y e r e d s o i l s ys te m .C om plian ce f u n c t i o n s f o r a r i g i d c i r c u l a r s u r f a c e f o u n d a t i o ni n h o r iz o n t a l, v e r t i c a l , rock ing and to rs iona l modes .R ig id massless c y l i n d e r f u l l y em bedded an d s u b j e c t e d t oRayle igh wave input .S c a t t e r i n g r e sp o n s e o f a r i g i d s q u a r e s u r f a c e f o u n d at i o ns u b j e c t e d t o SH-, SV- , P-waves and Ra yl eig h waves.SSI re sponse o f a stick model on a r i g i d d i sk w i t h t h ec o n t r o l p o i n t a t g r a d e l e v e l .

C o l l e c t i v e l y , the examples requ i re 174 e x e c u t i o n s o f t h e nine SASSI modules.S o l u t i o n s a re compared w i t h c l o s e d form s o l u t i o n s , open l i t e r a t u r e , anda1 t e r na t e Val id a t ed program results. The Val i d a t i on probl ems have been runand checked on t h e DOE Savannah River Cray XMP computer which i s s i m i l a r t ot h e RL and LANL Crays . The extent o f SRS m odu le t e s t i n g i s a s f o l l o w s :SourceModule Executions Lines Module Descr ipt ion

SITE 30 2800 Free f i e l d s i t e r e sp o n s e s o l u t i o n .POINT2 4 1200 Two dim ensi ona l ve rs io n o f POINTS.POINT3HOUSEMOTORANALYSCOMB INMOT IONSTRESSTOTAL

20 190031 410026 35049 3100

1 2708 17005 2000

174 17400

P o i n t l o a d s o l u t i o n n e e d e d f o r i n t e r -a c t i on n ode f l e x i b i l i t y m a t ri x .S t i f f n e s s and mass m a t r i c e s f o r s t r u c t u r ean d e x c a v at e d s o i l .Load v e c t o r c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o e x t e r n a lf o r c e s , e . g . , m a c h in e ry .Formation o f impedance matr ices andl oa d s; s o l u ti o n f o r t r a n s f e r f u n c t io n s .Combination of two ANALYS frequency setsi n t o o n e.Time h i s t o r i e s o f a cc e l e r a t o ns ,c a l c u l a t i o n o f r e sp o n se s p e c t r a .Eva1 ua ti on o f maximum stresses ands t r a i n s i n s t r u c t u r a l e l e m e n t s .

The s c o p e o f th e v a l i d a t i o n e f f o r t shows good balance .Example 2, Cases 1-5, a l o n g w i t h Example 9, Case 5, were adop ted as th e in-uset e s t i n g set, b e c a u s e t h e y exercise a l l the modules.9, 11, an d 17 were run on t h e RL Cray, and th e results compared favorab ly w i t ht h e v a l i d a t i o n r e p o r t .SASSI i n s t a l l a t i o n on th e INEL C r a y s t a r t e d i n l a t e 1993 a s a r e p la c e m e n t f o rthe R L Cray.anomalous results i f a s i n g l e b lo c k was used fo r the s t r u c t u r a l s t i f f n e s s

In add i t ion , Examples 5,

I t p asse d t h e in-use tes t . However, a was te ta n k model produced


14/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page 4matrix i n the house module. Testing on other Cray sites and workstationscould not reproduce the anomalous results. Installation at INEL was thendropped in favor of LANL. A precise cause of the anomalous results at I N E L wasnever identified. Consequently, other than the extensive testing thatfollowed, no claim is made that a similar incident cannot happen again.At LANL, t he in-use tes ts and two was te tan k models (including the one withanomalous results at INEL) proved satisfactory.experience, however, it was decided to run all 18 test cases from the Bechtel-SRS validation report and compare with R L output obtained by Kaiser EngineersHanford (KEH) in an effort following the RL Cray installation (Luo 1994).Testing with these cases was based entirely on computer-differencing of testand reference files and proved satisfactory.Hadjian (1989) reports on a n experiment designed t o evaluate and synthesizeresults o f several soil-structure interaction analyses based upon measuredresponses o f a 1/4 scale containment model in the quake-prone Lotung region o fTaiwan.equivalent 1 inear methods and assuming vertically propagating shear wavescaptured the essential features of variations of ground motion with depth.Considering recorded results with the model containment, several analysesmethods were compared by Tang (1989).in thi s comparison, and it proved to be as good as or better than any othermethod in its prediction capability.

Considering th e INEL

Results of this reference indicate that deconvolution analyses using

SASSI was employed by two organizations

Finally, two in-house projects (Giller 1991, Winkel 1991) used both the SASSIand FLUSH systems for analyzing embedded and underground structures.reasonable comparisons between the two systems added t o the confidence in theSASSI system.SHAKE ha s been widely used in the industry since its introduction in the early70's.checked satisfactorily with the output provided. I n addition, a soil profiletypical o f the Hanford site was analyzed with the Fc correlation (see AppendixA) to a 0.2 g Newmark-Hall time history appropriate to the response spectrumgiven in SDC4.1, Rev 11 (Hanford, 1989). The results compared well with FLUSHresults (Winkel, 1991). SHAKE91 was given similar testing.HOUSEPLT was satisfactorily tested with nine o f the HOUSE module validationproblems. Testing included ANSYS plots with all useful plotting options;details may be found in Appendix A .TRFILTER, HFILTER, and SMFILTER based on normal vs truncated output.

The

The test input cases provided by EERC with the source were run and

Users should check usage of the filters

The reliability o f the LANL/SASSI system demonstrated by the above discussionsis considered adequate for impact level 2 software to be used by qualifiedengineers.CONVERSIONThe SASSI version as received was for a Cray 1s system. The effort to convertto the Cray XMP under the Unicos operating system was minimal, beingrestricted to sensing what memory is available to the user and allocatingto blank common. SHAKE and SHAKE91 conversions were also minor, beingrestricted to character variables, a1 ignment considerations and formatting

t


15/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page 5Details of t he conversions are given in Appendix B .CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENTInstallation: SASS1 - L A N L Cray Y M P (gamma, zeta machines)SHAKE91, SHAKE - LANL Cray, DOS PC, SECC sgi3 w/sHOUSEPLT - LANL Cray, DOS PC, SECC sgi3 w/sUser access:LANL Cray: Normal Cray access plus copy of program file from C F S to

DOS PC: Through the user's PC to server area \\whc240\special.temporary directory. See Appendix A.Appendix A.temporary directory. See Appendix A.

SeeSECC: Normal SECC access plus copy of program fil e from CFS to

Custodian: EO WeinerUser identi f cati on :Users should identify themselves to the custodian and indicate theinstallation to be used. They should also indicate when usage is no

1 onger anticipated.Files:Source files: *.f (Cray, SECC), *.f (PC) and ic1im.c.Main executable f 1 es :

Auxiliary executable files (see Appendix A):Configuration f 1 es:

site, point2, point3, house, motor, analys, motion,combin, and stress.shake, shake91, houseplt, trfilter, hfilter, smfilter, rdtable, f ssassila.res: script - Cray compile and load sourcessassila.tst: script - Cray in-use testingsassiws.res: script - sgi3 compile and load sourcessassiws.tst: script - sgi3 in-use testingsassi.usr: custodian's list of userssassi .log: custodian's lognotes: custodians notessassires.bat: DOS batch - compile and load sources on PCssassitst.bat: DO S batch - in-use testing on PCse2c*d: example 2 inputs, SRS validatione9c*d: example 9, case 5 inputs, SR S validation*.inp, *.out: te st i/o files.nsbtest: dynamic memory exampleVal id/: Val idation problems*.doc: excerpts from user's manuals

In-use testing:

sassi.out is the concatenationo f representative e[29]c* outputs from testsOther:

Primary storage:Source, in-use testing, configuration files (no executables):LANL CFS /eow/sassi .tar.Z


16/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page 6Program f 1 es (executabl es , exampl es, *.doc f 1 es) :LANL CFS /eow/sassiusr. tar (requires general read access)

Backup storage:Source, in-use testing, configuration files (no executables):Program files (executables, examples, *.doc files):

RL CFS /w91428/sassi .tar.ZCustodian's PC, dir=c:\sassi\refCopy and recompile from LANL or R L source files

Other storage:Val idation problems:R L CFS /w91428/sassi/bval inp.tar.ZCustodian's PC c:\sassi\validError reporting and modifications:All errors and anomalies as well as modification requests should bedirected to the custodian in writing.revisions are made by the custodian with the approval of his manager.

They are announced by distribution t o a list of users maintained by thecustodian. Changes to the programs are tested and documented by thecustodian, in a manner conforming to WHC-CM-3-10.Custodian log/l stingThe custodian maintains a log of significant events such as errorreports, resolutions, modifications, changes in operating environment orconfiguration.the custodian on his PC, dir=c:\sassi.

Error reports and program

Source listings and test outputs are maintained by

Rest orat onRestoration (compile and load) is performed by the custodian. For Crayrestoration, sources may be copied from the permanent storage (CFS/eow/sassi .tar.Z) , uncompressed, and untarred to a Cray disk directory,typically in the custodian's temporary area.compiles and loads the sources, establishing a sassiusr programdirectory. Sources and other user-unnecessary materi a1 are removed bythe custodian with a script cleanup.scr. The sassiusr should be storedon CFS for user access. Access rights for the user should beestablished with the cfs command: mod sassiusr aval=O/r/-/s.testing can be with sassila.tst. For PC restoration to k: , sassires.batcan be run by the custodian.

Script sassila.res then

In-use

In-use TestingIn-use testing is to be conducted with changes in operating environmentor configuration. The Cray and SECC modules are tested by thecustodian, and the PC modules are tested by the individual user on hismachine. Script and batch files are provided: sassila.tst for the Cray,sassiws.tst for sgi3 and sassitst.bat for the PC.*.inp files are input test files, and *.out files are reference outputfiles.modules after restoration and differencing the resulting outputs againstthe reference outputs. Differences sent to *.dif files may show versionnumber and timing differences, etc.reference outputs from the SECC executions, and they may show minor

I n these scripts,In-use testing consists of running *.inp files with the current

The PC modules typically have


17/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page 7round off and timing differences which are acceptable. Testing on theserver PC is done initially by the custodian. See Appendix C fordetails. With satisfactory results, the custodian should replace thereference outputs with t he newly generated results on th e server.Testing by the user on his own machine by copying the PC serverdirectory k:\eow\sassi to his own directory and executing sassitst. atshould then produce a close match.

ScriptsScripts 1 isted in this configuration report provide detailon how the SASSI system is configured. The custodian insudetails o f the scripts are current.Moving f iles such as sassi.tar.2 and sassiusr.tar with FT Pbe done in the binary mode. Such moves may be necessary wwell as the Internet file transfers offsite.

File transfers

REV IS ONS

informationes that

should a1 waysth RL CFS as

Version Program Compi er Operating Revision

cft 77 4/3/91 SASS I cft7 7 6.0.2.0 Unicos 7.0 Initialcft 77 4/26/91 SHA KE cft77 6.0.2.0 Unicos 7.0 Initialcft77 6/7/94 SHAKE91 cf t77 6.0.2.0 Unicos 7.0 Initialcft77 9/7/91 HOUSEPLT cft7 7 6.0.2.0 Unicos 7.0 Initial

Version System

Version identification is included in the program sources and the printedoutput of each application. SHAKE, SHAKE91 and HOUSEPLT modules available onthe PC are identical to the Cray versions. The PC copies are compiled withLahey f771 version 4.01 with th e DOS 3.31 operating system.REFERENCES

WHC, 1993, "Softw are Practices", WHC-CM-3-10, Re1 0, 1-31-93.DeSalvo, G.J. and R.W. Gorman, 1989, "ANSYS Engineering Analysis SystemUser's Manual", f or revision 4.4, Swanson analysis Systems, Inc.,Houston PA 15342, 1989.Lysmer, J. et al, 1975, "FLUSH - A Computer Program for Approximate 3-DAnalysis of Soil-Structure Interaction Problems", Report No. EERC75-30, College of Engineering, University of California, BerkeleyCA Y November 1975, available from NTIC as PB 259 332.Hadjian, A.H. et al, 1989 "Soil-Structure Interaction Lotung Experiment:Prediction Evaluation Basis", SMiRT 10, v o l K / 1 , p 187, August 1989Idriss, I.M., 1992, "User's Manual f or SHAKEgl", program and codeavail able from NISEE, Earthquake Engineering Research Center,University of California, Berkeley, CAJ. Lysmer et a1 . 1991, "SASSI User's Manual", Bechtel Corp., San


18/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page 8Francisco, 1991.

J. Lysmer et al., 1981, "SASSI - A System for Analysis of Soil-StructureInteraction" , Report No. UCB/GT/81-02, Geotechnical Engineering,University of California, Berkeley, April 1981.Bechtel , 1991, "SASSI Theoretical Manual", Bechtel Corp. , San Francisco,1991.Bechtel , 1990, "SASSI Val idation Report", prepared for WestinghouseSavannah River Co., Aiken, S C by Bechtel Savannah River, Inc., 1990.Tang, Y.K. , 1989, "Proceedings: EPRI/NRC/TPC Workshop on Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis Techniques Using Data from Lotung,Taiwan", NP-6154, Research Project 2225, EPRI, March 1989.Bathe, K.-J. et al, 1974, "SAP I V - A Structural Analysis Program forStatic and Dynamic Response of Linear Systems", Report N o . EERC 73-11, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley CAY

April 1974.Schnabel, P.B. et al., 1972, "SHAKE - A Computer Program for EarthquakeResponse Analysis of Horizontally Layered Sites", Report No. EERC72-12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University ofCal fornia, Berkeley CA Y December 1972.Hanford, 1989, "Arch-Civil Design Criteria, Design Loads for Facilities",HPS-SDC-4.1, Rev 11, May 1989.Giller, R.A. and E.O. Weiner, 3991, "Soil Structure Interaction Analysisfor the Hanford Site 241-SY-101 Double-Shell Waste Storage Tanks" ,WHC-EP-0504, Westinghouse Hanford Co. , Rich1 and WA Y September 1991.


19/43

WHC-SO-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page A-1

Appendi x A. Runstream Examples and User Information


20/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page A-2

Appendix A. Runstream Examples and User Information

SASSI SCRIPT EXAMPLEThe following LANL PROD script runs the example cases 1 and 2 shown in TableA.2-3 of the validation manual (Bechtel, 1990).should obtain th e executables from CFS. It demonstrates how the user

#!/bin/csh# PROD jo b assumed. Above line assures C-shell interpretationuname -a # identify platformdateda # initiate job accountingunset nocl obberlimit -v -jO -m8000000cd /usr/tmp/youridcfs get /eow/sassiusr.tarset p = /usr/tmp/yourid/sassiusrmkdir -p $pcd $ptar xvf ../sassiusr.tarcd .. # back to /usr/tmp/youridmkdi r exampl ecd example # run directorycp $p/e2c* .## SASSI run script, Example 2# See User Manual Table 4.6-3 and Validation Manual Tabl e A.2-3## Case 1 Horizontal#$p/site te2clsd >e2clsomv fort.1 e2cltlmv fort.2 e2clt2#cp e2clt2 fort.2$p/point3 e2clpomv fort.3 e2clt3#$p/house te2clhd >e2clhom v fort.4 e2clt4#$p/motor te2clhmd >e2clhmomv fort.9 e2clht9#cp e2clt3 fort.3cp e2 clt4 fort.4cp e2 clht9 fort.9$p/analys e2clhao

# redirected output is forced# limit memory to < 20 Mw max# your own tmp directory# sassi tarred executables from cfs# make program directory# untar program file into $p

# copy inputs to run directory


21/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page A-3mv f o r t 95 e 2 c l t 5mv f o r t . 9 6 e 2 c l t 6mv f o r t . 8 e 2 c l h t 8## Case 1 Rock ing#$p/motor te2 c l rm d >e2c l rmom v f o r t . 9 e 2 c l r t 9#cp e 2 c l r t 9 f o r t . 9cp e 2 c l t 6 f o r t . 9 6$ p / a na l y s t e 2 c l r a d > e 2 c l r aomv f o r t . 8 e 2 c l r t 8## Case 2 SSI# Warning: house i n p u t e2c2hd must have maxc & maxt i n e2c lho ou tpu t above#$p/house te2 c2h d >e2c2homv f o r t . 4 e 2 c 2 t 4#cp e 2 c l t l f o r t . 1cp e 2 c l t 5 f o r t . 9 5c p e 2 c 2 t 4 f o r t . 4$p/a naly s te2c2 ad >e2c2aomv f o r t . 9 6 e 2 c 2 t 6mv f o r t . 8 e 2 c 2 t 8#c p e 2 c 2 t 8 f o r t . 8$p/mot ion te2c2od >e2c200mv f o r t . 1 2 e 2 c 2 t 1 2#j a - s t

The nqs s c r i p t makes no a t tem pt t o save the *o o u tp u t o r * t n d a ta f i l e s . T h i sshou ld be done w i th CFS commands i n th e sc r i p t .a p p r o p r i a t e d o cu m en ta ti on s h ou l d be c o n s u l te d f o r d e t a i l s .LANL Unicos and otherAssum ing t h e above s c r i p t i s j o b l , s u bm i t t h e j o b w i t h :

gamma% prodP r o d > s u b m i t j o b l t = 1 8 0 p r = 9 s=* t a=gProd> endN ot e t h a t t h e t a r g e t m a chine (gamma) i s s p e c i f i e d w i t h t a = g and t h a t t h et em p or ar y r u n a r e a i s s p ec i f i d i n th e s c r i p t as /us r / tmp /your id /examp l e .u s er ca n e xp e ct t o f i n d o u t pu t f i l e s t h e r e up t o 48 h o ur s l a t e r . I f t h et a r g e t m ac hi ne we re l e f t o pen and t h e t e m p o ra r y a r e a n o t s p e c i f i e d , i t i s n o tc l e a r t h a t u nsa ved f i l e s c o u l d be r ec o ve re d . SASS1 i s o n ly t e s t e d on gammaand ze ta , and usage shou ld be re s t r i c t e d t o those machines. The t=180 en t rydenotes a l i m i t o f 180 CP minu tes , and p r=9 seems t o be a s tandard p r i o r i t y .S t a nd a rd o u t p u t i s p la c e d i n t h e u s e r ' s home d i r e c t o r y . The LANL PRODd o cu m en ta ti on s h o u ld be c o n s u lt e d f o r d e t a i l s o f s u b m i t t i n g p r o d u c t i o n r u n s .

The

ON-LINE DOCUMENTATION


22/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page A-4Excerp ts f rom th e use r ' s manuals have been p lace d on - l i ne as *.doc f i l e s onthe Cray, s g i3 w/s and PC s e r v e r w i t h t h e p ro gra m f i l e s .u se d a u x i l i a r i e s s uc h as f s a r e n o t c om p il ed o n some o f t h e p l a t f o r m s .s uc h c as es t h e *.doc f i l e i s t h e s o ur ce f i l e w hi ch t h e u s e r may co m pi le .

Some o f t h e seldomI nDATA FILESD ata o u tp u t f i l e s l i k e e 2 c l t 4 appear as f o r t . 4 a f t e r e xe c u ti o n o f th e f i r s tHOUSE m odule. The e xc e p t i on t o t h e r u l e i s : f i l e s t h a t s ho u ld show up asfo r t . 5 o r fo r t .6 (e.g. , e 2c l t 5 f rom ANALYS) show up as fo r t .9 5 and fo r t . 96 . I ti s t h e u s e r ' s t a s k t o m an ip u la t e and save t h e p r op e r f i l e s i n accordance wi ththe user manual .Recommended c u r re n t p r ac t i ce i s t o rename ou tpu t f 0 r t . n f i l e s n eeded l a t e r as( f o r example) eZc l tn , and then copy it b a ck t o f 0 r t . n when needed as input. I tmig h t be po ss ib le t o sk ip th e rename/copy p rocesses . Fo r examp le , fo r t .4 f romHOUSE shou ld be good fo r ANALYS, because mo d i f i c a t i o n o f fo r t .4 by the sys temhas no t been no ted un less dec la red i n the user manual .RESOURCE ESTIMATESANALYS CPU, f i l e s i z e and memory es t ima to rs a re based on a 3 h r ru n:

CPU (sec) = (NUMGP*NDOF)**3 * NF * SCPUTAPE5 (words) = (NUMGP*NDOF)**Z * NF * S5MEM (words) = (NUMGP*NDOF)**2 * SMEM t 300000where

CPU = ANALYS cpu est im at e, secTAPE5 = t ape5 s i ze es t ima te , wordsMEM = HOUSE and ANALYS common b l o c k req ui re m en t, wordsNUMGP = num ber o f i n t e r a c t i o n n odesNDOF = number o f degrees o f f reedom pe r i n te ra c t io n nodeNF = number o f f re quen c iesSCPU = c p u s c a l e f a c t o r = .4e-6S5 = t a p e 5 s c a l e f a c t o r = 3SMEM = memory sca le fac tor = 2TAPE6 s iz es ar e about l i k e TAPE5, and the o th er ta pes ar e much sm al l er .ANALYS mod ule dom ina tes t h e cpu cons ump tion. The CPU e s t i m a t e i s k nown t o bel o w f o r sm a ll j o bs , b y a f a c t o r o f 1.5 f o r a 10 min jo b . The o t he r modules(SITE, POINT3, HOUSE, e t c ) a r e much qu ic ke r. See t h e memory ex pa ns iond i s c u s s i o n b el ow f o r HOUSE memory.

The

As an example,NUMGP = 469NDOF = 3NF = 10

s oCPU = (469*3)**3 * 10 * .4e-6 = 11140 sec vs 11100 sec actual


23/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page A- 5TAPE5 = (469*3)**2 * 10 * 3 = 59 Mword = 480 MbyteMEMORY = (469*3)**2 * 2 = 4.0 Mword

In sm a l l e r j o b s , one may consider using t h e maximum core ava i l ab le , e spec ia l lyi f i t results i n s i n g l e b lo ck s t i f f n e s s s t o ra g e per HOUSE b lo ck s t o r a g ei n f o r m a t i o n o u t p u t . This may improve t h e t u r n a r o u n d , b u t n o t l i k e l y th e CPUconsum ption. The l a r g e TAPE5/6 s i z e should be noted.f i l e s t o r a g e pr ob le ms a nd u nn eed ed c o s t s . A rerun o f ANALYS as opposed t o ar e s t a r t sh o u l d b e c o n s i d e r e d a l o n g w i t h t h e l i k e l i h o o d o f a r e s t a r t need.I t may cause permanentMEMORY EXPANSIONMemory expansion i n HOUSE and ANALYS i s f a i r l y s t r a i g h t fo rw ar d as th eprograms de tec t t h e maximum a v a il ab le (up t o 20 Mw) and back off 4 .7 Mw withhouse and 3 .7 Mw w i t h an al y s f o r a maximum b la nk common. The l i m i t ( ) commandmay be used t o redu ce the maximum memory available i n view of t h e memory t im ei n t e g r a l c o n t r i b u t i o n t o cpu c h a rg e s o r user r e q u ir e m e n ts t o p l a c e 1 i m i t a t i o n son t h e SASSI matr ix block ing procedure .I n d o i n g r e s t a r t s w i t h HOUSE and ANALYS i t w a s p o s s i b l e f o r t h e u s e r t o g e tt r a p p e d i n t h e RL system. A HOUSE run would bl oc k TAPE4 t o t h e maximum s i z ep o s s i b l e . Then ANALYS use d t h i s TAPE4 a s i n p u t , and blocked TAPE5 the sameway. Heknew t h a t he had t o f o r c e HOUSE t o use t h e o l d b l o c k i n g w i t h MAXT and MAXC sot h a t t h e e n su in g ANALYS mode 2 r u n would read TAPE4 and TAPE5 w i t h t h e sameb l o c k i n g .i s u s u a l l y l a r g e r . I n s t e a d t h e ANALYS mode 2 r u n f a i l s w i t h a sm a l l sh o r t a g eo f c o r e .prevent the problem from occurr ing a t LANL. I f n o t , the user might make i t ap o l i c y t o l i m i t ( ) memory somewhat as a p ra c t ic e and t h e n i n c r e a s e i t f o r t h eANALYS r u n i f t h e problem occurs .

Then t h e user changed t h e su pe rs t r uc tu re and di d an oth er HOUSE run.One would expect the restart HOUSE r u n t o f a i l , because t h e model

I t i s hoped that t h e s m a l l e r HOUSE bl ank common (vs ANALYS) w i l l

The need f o r MUSE i n p u t i n t h e HOUSE module is n o t u n d e r s t o o d . I n p u t o fMUSE>O appears t o i n t e r f e r e w i t h user i n p u t o f MAXT an d MAXC r e q u i r e d t oinsure c o o r d i n a t e d b l o c k s i z e s d a t a f i l e s . The d e f a u l t MUSE i n p u t i srecommended a t this time.EMBEDDED BLANKSThe CFT77 options used t o compile SASSI include th e d e f a u l t BN i / o o p t i o nw h i c h condenses out embedded blanks i n i n t e g e r a n d r ea l i n p u t . An i n p u t f i e l dw i t h 11 1 1 r e a d s 1111 i n s t e a d o f 110101, so i t i s su g g e s t e d t h a t the u s e r p u ti n the z e r o s i n c a s e t h e program reads i t w i t h ( i 6 ) i n s t e a d o f ( 6 i l ) . . Ac o m p l e t e l y b l a n k f i e l d is s t i l l r e a d as a zero.HOUSE GENERATIONExamples of node and element g e n e r a t i o n i n HOUSE may provide somec l a r i f i c a t i o n t o the user manual.The n od e c a r d se q u en c e ( s t a r t - e n d c a r d s )

c 5 1 1 5 .0 0.0 10.0 19.0 0.0 14.0 2


24/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page A-6produces

c 5 1 1c 7 1 1s 9 15 .0 * 0 .0 10.07 .0 0.0 12.09 .0 0 .0 14 .0

Thus, intermedia te nodes are generated using the end card increment and thestart card boundary conditions and coordinate system. The last card boundaryconditions are not generated from the start card; they are read fr om the endcard. The user will probably always use the same coordinat e system on boththe start and end cards. Note how the example works when they are different.The beam element sequence

10 12 14 120 1 1 513 22 29 120 1 1 2produces

10 12 14 120 1 111 17 19 120 1 112 22 24 120 1 113 22 29 120 1 1Thus, intermedi ate elements are generated from the start card using th e startcard increment for node numbers, and each i ntermedi ate element is gener ated.The end card no des are not generated; they are read from the end card.BASEMENT STRUCTURE AND INTERACTION NODESThe topic o f interaction nodes and basement structure needs special attention.It was found t hat an interior basement wall physically not connected t o theactual soil did not respond as expected as an oscillator excited at its base.The wall nod es wer e all identified as interaction nodes. The problem wascorrected by creating sepa rate non-interaction n odes for the wall structureaway from the base, and this correction was verified as app ropriate with oneof the develope rs at Bechtel. Interaction nodes are used to model excavatedsoil, and thei r separation requirem ents are governed by soil properties.Basement structural nodes identified as interaction nodes appa rently shouldhave stiff paths t o the actual soil. Clearly all exterior wall nodes shouldbe interaction nodes.OTHER THINGS NOTED

- Interacti on nodes in HOUSE need to be precisely on la yer interfaces. Theuser has to plan his grid accordingly. The recommended way is to use asimple grid with not too many layers. Then SHAKE91 can be run withthose s ame layers, and the resulting data can be fed i nto HOUSE andSITE.

- SYMMETRY: The user's manual might lead one to believe tha t simplydeclaring a symmetry plane will take care of the boundary conditions.Apparently, the program will provide them for the soil impedenc e matrix,but not for the structure or excavated soil. The user must definitely


25/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page A-7provide them for the structure, and it appears prudent to provide themfor the excavated soil. Generally, symmetric boundary conditions zeroout one translational and two rotational dofs (degrees of freedom) thatproduce deformation out of the plane. Asymmetric boundary conditionszero out two translational and one rotational dof that producedeform ation wholly in the plane.

- SPRINGS: Th ere is no obvious way to model the normal point-to-pointtrus s with the spring element. An alternative is to use beam elementswith member end releases (do NOT release BOTH torsional dofs).- TRIANGULAR ELEMENTS: P1 ate/shell triangular elements are entered byomitting the fourth node. Quad2d triangular elements have the fourthnode equal to the third.

, - TRIANGULAR SHELL ELEMENTS: Sections C.10.3.3 and H.3.3.2 of the user'smanual describe the plate element local axes.figure of H.3.3.2 shows the K- and L-nodes coalesced. Instead, theL-node should be coalesced with the I-node: the L-label should be movednext to the I-label. Then the orientation of the local axes in thefigure will be consistent with the definition in C.10.3.3.bending results should be interpreted as occurring at the K-node.Membrane results are constant over the triangle and would be betterinterpreted at the centroid.

The triangl e in the

Note that

- NPAR(1) essentially defaults to 1 in HOUSE- MOTION: Printing several response spectra with MOTION is a good way o fgetting a quick overall view of the results. MOTION is cheap. If timehistories are punched (per user manual), they are also printed, and thisjust gets in the way of the plotted response spectra.consider two separate runs in this case.- SITE: Aborts with a 90 degree incidence angle.- STRESS with 2D quads will print T-OCT if requested with the fourth key.The manual does not show this, most likely because the programming (inroutine oct4) looks bad: Toct=(SxxtSzztTxz)/3. Asking for Toct withelement 4 is definitely not advised.

The user might

Use 89 degrees.

Users are reminded t o contact the custodian to insure they are on th e userlist along with initial and final dates of usage.PC AND WORKSTATION MODULESI n addition to the Cray, SHAKE, SHAKE91 and HOUSEPLT and the filter modulesare available on the PC and the SECC sgi3 workstation.To access th e PC versions, key in

connect k: \\whc240\specialcopy k:\eow\sassi\*.* c:\sassiThe individual programs are run on the user's machine with redirection, e.g.,


26/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page A-8C:cd \sassishake91 tinput >output

Do not run th e program on theversion runs 20 time s as slow shared area of the file server. The PC shake91as on the workstation.It is the responsibilit y of the user to conduct PC in-use testi ng to insureth e system is working properly on his particular machine. The testingprocedure is described in the configuration management section of this report,and the batch file sassitst.bat in k:\eow\sassi is constructed to facilit atethis testing.SASS1 auxiliary programs SHAKE91, S HAKE and HOUSEPLT are available on the SECCworkstati on sgi3. Access to these programs is through the custodian'sdirectory in C F S . The users should store and run them on their own temporarydirectories in the workstation, e.g.,

cd /t sgi3/youridftp cVsgate[enter id, password, set binary mode]cd /w91428get sassiusr.tarquitcd /t sgi3/yourid/sassiusrtar xVf . /sassiusr.tarcd /t sgi3/yourid/rundira1 as-shake '/t sgi3/yourid/sassiusr/shake'shake tinput >oGtputSHAKE91This progra m was favored over the old SHAKE, because it provided for moresoil types and layers, and it provided a more direct way of entering soilproperties.found in SHAKE91.effect, even tho ught the SHAKE91 manual does not mention it.the old SHAKE manuals.

Printer plots along with so me seldom-used op tions are no longerIt should be noted that some old SHAKE input is still i nDon't th row outI n particular,- Option 2 line 1 MWL input in cols 11-15 is not in the SHAKE91 manual.Omitting it means that MWL=O and amounts to putting th e water table atthe top o f layer 2.hydro-pressure removed.Th e user can input MWL to get the total pressure expected.- Option 2 line 2+ NLN input in cols 11-15 is also missing in the manual.

It will produce sub layers within t he one-line layer.

The total pressure in the output has waterIt has no other effect on other ouput, however.

Changes pertinent to the user:- Usage is like SHAKE; after copying similar to SHAKE described above, theprogram is executed with:

shake91 tinput >output # t/h output on file "punch"


27/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 R ev 1Page A-9- Added co de to take Poisson's ratio input in Option 2 line 2 t in cols66-75 for each layer and produce iterated soil property output suitablefor SASSI input. User must insure consistency of units.

Other things noted:- Option 9 (compute response spectrum) has input for the acceleration ofgravity, which seems unusual since the program has a built-in value of32.2 ft/sec/sec. The option 9 input seems to affect only the spectraldisplacement and velocity output units of the same option. If the userwanted the spectral velocity in cm/sec, then g = 981 would beappropri ate.

SHAKEThe SHAKE program solves the free-field soil problem with iteration onstrain-dependent soil properties.properties as fixed input to SASSI. The FLUSH program has the SHAKEcapability built into it; SASSI does not. Punch output is to be found on thenamed file "punch".386/20e.sequence c heck was disabled.

Common practice uses SHAKE-derived soil

The test problems take a little over a minute on a CompaqThe PC must have a 80n87 math coprocessor. The time historyThe treatment o f units in the manual is delicate at best, especially for sand.The user should refer to the manual example input and output to insure hisunderstanding of the Option 2 81 8 processes.input be used to enter Ks=G/Go and beta vs strain as was the practic e withFLUSH. Here, G and Go are the shear moduli at strain and low strain,respectively.soil in Option 2 with

It is suggested that Option 8The low strain shear modulus is then entered via Fs for sandy

Fs = Go / sqrt(Sm)Go = low strain shear modulus, ksfSm = (1 t 2*sko)/3 * headhead = overburden pressure, psfsko = coefficient of earth pressure at rest, default = .45The (c) note in Option 2 has a factor of 1000 in the Gs formula. It appearsthat the program internally applies this factor and that the user should not.The user should think in terms of ksf input for the shear modulus. One couldview Fs as an correlation tool: a representative value should suffice unlessther e is evidence of drastic changes in soil properties. See Reference Al. Analternative would be t o use the clay correlation Fc=Go which is more .likeFLUSH practice. However, the sand correlation tends to produce smootheriterated modulus profiles in large layers with constant Fs values, because thesqrt(Sm) relation tends to soften the soil near th e top of the layer, while aconstant Go produces increasing iterated G values toward the top of the layer.The user is cautioned about using the sand correlation near the surface wherethe control motion is specified.attenuate the free field motion at depth, and thi s could lead tounconservative excitation for embedded structures.

Soft soil under the control point tends to

Fs input example:


28/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page A-104096 P ro je ct t i t l e2 Read so i l p r o f i le da ta . Note: to ta l sub layers


29/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page A -113 1 3 34.0 6127. 0.05 0.13704 1 2 21.0 35315. 0.05 0.14005 1 1 20.0 84174. 0.05 0.14006 1 2 55.0 26242. 0.05 0.12507 1 3 60.0 19390. 0.05 0.12908 1 1 16.0 38161. 0.05 0.12009 .12 8000.3 A s sign m o tion t o s u r f a c e18 M a te r i a l p r o p e r ty s t r a in d e pe nd en ce1 1 10 100.11 100. SAND -- SEED & IDRISS 1970, STIFFNESS-0 00 1 .000316 .001 .00316 .01 .0316 - 1

.06 .06 .06

. OOO l .000316 .001 .00316 .01 .0316 .1

1. 3.16 10.1 o .99 .96 .89 .74 .53 .3011 100. SAND -- SEED & I D R I S S 1970, DAMPING

1. 3.16 10.0.5 0.9 1.7 3.1 5.6 9.7 15.525. 25. 25.1 Read i n m t mot ion

6127. 1.35315. 1.84174. 1.26242. 1.19390. 3 .38161. 1.

,316.15.316

21 .

2000 4096 .005 Newmark-Hall 0.29 SDC4.1 Rev 11.224 20.0.01 4141 0.015267 0.0159 51 0.016336 0.016758 0.016979 0.016954 0.016629...0.097009 0.094396 0.091645 0.089001 0.08675 0.07806 0.069304 0.0304454 S t r a i n co m pa ti bl e s o i l p r o p e r t i e s1 5 5. .650 s t o pS e v e r a l o t h e r comments can be made with respect t o O p t i o n s 2 and 8:

- The den s i ty i npu t in Op tion 2 i s i n ksf.- Use damping factor BFAC=l i f Option 8 d e s c r ib e s t h e d a m p in g .- The shear modu l i an d damping values (GMOD and B y cc 26-45) e n t e r e d i nOption 2 a r e i n i t i a l g u es se s used t o s t a r t t h e f r e e f i e l d i t e r a t i o np r o c e s s c a l l e d fo r by Option 8.- Note t h a t t h e l a s t O p t i o n 2 c a r d i s for t h e e l a s t i c h a l f s pa c e and t h a to ne ne ed o n ly e n t e r t h e l a y e r number, d e n s i t y and s t a r t i n g s h e a rv e l o c i t y .- The wate r leve l i s s p e c i f i e d by t h e s u b l a y e r number, no t the l a y e rnumber.- Note tha t Op t ion 8 d o e s n o t h av e a m a te r i a l t y p e e n t r y ( l= c l a y , 2 = s a n d ,e t c ) . I n s te a d , t h e f i r s t m a t er ia l pr es en te d i s for c l a y c a l l e d o u t f o ri n Option 2, and t h e s ec on d m a t e r i a l i s f o r s a n d. I f t h e user has on lysand i n th e model and shows on ly one mate r ia l in Op t ion 8, t h e runa b o r t s . T h e r e i s a f o u r t h m a t e r i a l t y p e w h i c h a p p e a r s t o be a c ub e r o o tsand correl a t on.

Program f s d e t e r m in e s Fs f a c t o r s f o r SHAKE o p t io n 2 f r o m s o i l d e n s i t y a n ds h e a r v e l o c i t y p r o f i l e s . C o e f f i c i e n t o f e a r t h pressure i s .45 (SHAKE


30/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page A-12default). Option 8 must be used to enter the iterated to low-strain shearmodulus ratio. Initial guesses output are .05 damping and input shearmodulus. The latter could be used as a clay Fc by way of an editor. Usermust review output for validity to his problem.

Usage: fs tinput >outputInput, one list directed line per layer with:* dbot Depth o f bottom of layer, ft* vs Shear velocity, fps* wt Density, pcfExample input and output:10 850 135 / comment28 1000 13562 1200 13783 2850 140

1 2 1 10.0 3029. 0.05 0.13502 2 1 18.0 4193. 0.05 0.13503 2 1 34.0 6127. 0.05 0.13704 2 1 21.0 35315. 0.05 0.1400

HOUSEPLT

146.5 1.104.0 1.98.5 1.445.8 1.

This program is a simple translation o f SASSI HOUSE module input to ANSYSversion 4.4 PREP7 input suitable fo r mesh plotting.the Cray and PC. It is available on bothUser instructions:- Read SASSI HOUSE input and translate for ANSYS 5.0 mesh- EO Weiner 6/23/94- Usage: houseplt thouseinput I asa >ansysinput # Cray/ws- Plotting can be done with the ansys system:

plotting with boundary conditions included.

housepl t thouseinput >ansysinput # PCansys/show, d/input,ansysinputepl ot

# or whatever plot device

- Since sassi element numbering starts with one i n each group,offsets (appearing as ANSYS comments) are added to each group.The element offset is always a multiple of 100.- ANSYS type is HOUSE group in the order of appearance.This permits element group selection with ersel ,type.ANSYS real is HOUSE geometry number f or beams.- Lumped masses are treated as Ansys unit mass elements underone group after the sassi element groups.- Viewpoint along the negative y axis is selected with z up.This is suitable for 2D elements./view,1,.7,.5.,5 at plot time.- Boundary condition restraints (id=l) are not removed later inthe ANSYS input when id=O is prescribed. The practice of firstrestraining all dofs followed by removing restraints at nodesin elements will show all dofs restrained. A work-around trick

For 3D elements, try


31/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page A-13may be t o remove t h e i n i t i a l g lo b al r e s t r a i n t f o r h o u se p ltp rocess ing and then p u t t i n g i t back i n f o r SASSI p ro cess ing .- There i s no ch ec kin g f o r HOUSE co ns is te nc y i n th is program.Check d a t a f i rst w i t h t h e HOUSE d a t a check o p t i o n .- ANSYS beam k-node doesn't generate l i ke HOUSE. Translationuses t h e spar element.

- T r a n s l a t i o n s o f r e a l v a l ue s ( a r e a s , e t c ) a n d m a te r i a lproper ty values (Young 's modulus , etc) are n o t a t t e m p te d .- Node, element, t y p e , m a te r i a l a n d real se le c t io ns may bemade a t p l o t t ime us in g ANSYS Se l e c t Log ic.- F o r t r a n s o u r c e n o t a t i o n f o l l o w s user's manual.- ANSYS i n p u t i s gene ra ted a lmos t imm ed ia te ly a s SASSI in pu ti s r e a d i n .boundary cond i t ions , etc.- e t , 1 , 6 3 a p p e a r s up f r o n t t o a c t i ve a l l 6 do f s and avo idwarn ings by d - l i nes befo re e-lines i n ANSYS 5.0- Element type mapping:Houseplt does not remember al l nodes , elements,

SASSI: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9ANSYS: 45 8 63 42 45 42 8 42 27T e s t i n p u t f o r HOUSEPLT i s a c c e s s i b l e t o t h e user on t h e PC and Cray programf i l e s . The results are shown i n F ig u r e s A . l through A.4.TRF I LTERThis sho r t p rog ram i s used t o f i l t e r ANALYS t r a n s f e r f u n c t i o n o u t p u t t os e l e c t e d n o d e s . User i n s t r u c t i o n s :

Fi l te r o u t t r a n s f e r f u nc t io n p r i n t from ANALYS ou t p u t .Usage : trf i 1t e r t a n a l y s . o u t > o u tp u t # CrayList n od es f o r d e s i r e d o u tp u t on f o r t . 1 0 , a ny o r d e r , 1000 max.Fi l ter o n /o f f i s depen ds on Fo rt ra n ANALYS o u tp u t hea di ng s.HF I LTERThis sho r t p rog ram t runca tes t h e e xt en si ve node and ele me nt ou tp ut from HOUSEand leaves t h e message "e t c , etc, e t c " .

Usage: h f i l e r t h o u s e . o u t > o u tp u tS M F I LTERThis s h o r t p ro gram t r u n c a t e s t h e e x t e n s i v e time h i s t o r y o ut p ut from MOTION andSTRESS and leaves the message " e t c , e t c , etc".

Usage: smfilter tmo t ion .ou t >ou tpu tRDTABLETh i s s h o r t p rogra m r e a d s i / o t a b l e s p r o v id e d w i t h t h e v a l i d a t i o n i n p u t s , andg e n e r a t e s script f i l e s f o r runn ing th e r e la te d SASSI modu les . The g e n e r a t e dscript f i l e s a r e n o t t o be c o n s id e r e d c o m ple t e . The user must check an dusual ly modify them. User i n s t r u c t i o n s :


32/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page A-14R ead sass i va l i da t i on p r ob l em i / o t ab l es and gene r a t e sc r i p t s .Usage: r d t a b l e < t a b l e > s c r i p tMove r i g h t h a l f o f t a b l e u nd er l e f t h a l f and dup m od ule c olu mn .I np u t f o r m a t i s ( 4( lx ,a7 ), lx ,a8 ) f o r m odule , ... , t apeou t .N ote r i g h t h a l f i n p u t colum n i s n ar ro w (6 c o l s ) , make i t 7.Needs unde rsco res i n f i r s t column t o sepa r at e ou t m odules.U se rs checks r e su l t s .Cannot handle PGMIMP o f T ab le 12.F i r s t n o n- bl an k l i n e i s o u t p u t as comment.Co ls 11-40 i n header a f t e r "MODULE" ar e out pu t as comment.

REFERENCESA l .

~

HB Seed, e t a1 . "Modul i and Damping Fac tors f o r Dynamic Analyses o fCohes ion less So i l SI', Re po rt No. UCB/EERC-84/14, Earth qua ke En g in ee ri ngR esea rch C ent er , U n i ve r s i t y o f C al i f o r n i a, Ber ke l ey CAY September 1984.


33/43


Figure A. 1 Housepl t/ANSYS boundary conditions

Figure A.2 Houseplt/ANSYS element outlines

39

A N S Y S S . 0 AJ U N 2 3 1 9 9 41 6 ; S O : t 4P L O T N O . 1E L E M E N T ST Y P E N U NUR O Tx v z o . 3Y V . - II V : 0 . 3D I S T = 6 . 2 6 1X F = l . SY F : ZI F : SV U P :Z

A Y S Y S S . 0 AJ U W 2 3 1 9 9 41 6 : S l : i qP L O T N O 2

T Y P E N U YE L E V E N T SX Y : 0 . 3Y V : - IZ Y i o . 3D l S T - S . 2 6 lX F = I . SY F = 2I F : IY U P : IE D G E


34/43


Fi gu re A.3 Houseplt / ANSYS element numbersI

Fi g ur e A.4 Houseplt/ANSYS ma te r ia l numbers1

A Y S Y S 5 . 0 AJ U Y 2 3 1 3 9 q1 6 : 5 1 : 5 6P L O l Y O . 3E L E Y E W l ST Y P E I U YX Y : 0 . 3Y Y = . IIY z o . 30 6 S T : 6 2 6 6 1F ~ 1 . 5I F : 2IF = SV U ? : I

A Y S I S 5 . 0 AJ U N 2 3 1 9 9 4l S : 5 5 : 5 3P L O T Y O 4E L E Y Y U Yx v z o . 3Y V . . Iz v z o . 3O I S 1 = 6 . 2 6 1X f z l . 5Y F : 2IF = 5V U P = I

E L E M E N T S


35/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 R e v 1Page B-1

Appendix B . Conversion


36/43

Appendix B . Conversion

S A S S 1 INSTALLATION

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page 8-2

Example input e2pd was renamed e2clpd for consistency. Sourc e files csite.f,chouse.f, etc were renamed site.f, house.f, etc, and executables ta ke the samenames without extension.All original source lines with cc 73-80 serial numbering were r etained,commented out if necessary. Added lines are in lower cas e withoutserialization.Module ana1ys.f uses units 5 and 6 for unformatted i/o.stdin and stdout, so the ANALYS streams were redirected t o fort.95 and fort.96with open statements. Users must recognized this when manipulating filesbetween modules.

This conflicts with

Modul es h0use.f and analys.f, as received, utilized dynamic memory expansionin subroutine files2.Unicos fortran callable sbreak(nnn). This is th e alternate method suggestedi n Appendix D o f the CFT77 manual. Note that the CFT77 Appendix D primaryrecommendation of using heap allocation was found to be useless - it passedthe small program test but failed in the final application. The originalvariable NAVA in routine files2 i s a fixed maximum memory size. This wasreplaced by an upper bound memory resource limit which i s machine andenvironment dependent. Communication o f this limit is done by the routineic1im.c which calls the Unicos limit(2) system routine. The use of sbrea krequires a fixed heap size of 1.2 Mw is identified in the segldr options alongwith identification of blank common as dynamic.chosen as Cray and INEL operational personal indicated that 32K w might beneeded for each open i/o unit, and analys shows 30 units in the programstatement.is reduced by the size of the executable (size house, includes the heap) plusa substantial -1-2 Mw cushion to eliminate uncertainties found i n differentenvironments. An sbreak error return causes the program to s to p . Contrary tothe original scheme, sbreak is called only once at the start o f the run ratherthan all ow blank common to expand and contract as calls to fil es2 are madeduring the execution. A small program nsbtest was written to test th.is memoryexpansion scheme in both batch and interactive environments.A user was t rapped by HOUSE/ANALYS memory restrictions in a restart attempt asdiscussed in the user appendix.problem, the lOOK cushion (see above) in files2 of ANALYS was te mporarilyremoved, and he was able to continue after recompilation. The practice is notencouraged. A larger cushion in HOUSE (t1 Mw over ANALYS) is employed to helpavert such problems.

The COS memory('uc',nnn) call was replaced with the

The large heap si ze wasFor the argument in the sbre ak call, t he maximum resou rce figure

Rather than force him to rework the entire

' Stress runs aborted when beam t ime history output was requested. .T he compilerwarning that varible LL i s used but undefined in beam output led to a small


37/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page 8-3correction to get full fft output.OPTIMIZATIONSince SASS1 is known to consu me computational r esource s for large embeddedbasement configurations, a few optimization checks were performed on the RLsystem. The default compilation options appear to optimize the program aswell as can be expected.SHAKE INSTALLATIONThe i nput/output f 1 e query feat ure was rep1 aced by redirect on by comment ngout the open statements for units 5 and 6. Option t itles written t o theconsole were commented out, as the runs are relatively short (-minute). Theseven figu re accuracy for shear modulus output during iteration was reduced tosix, so that output has a better chance of being repeatab le across PCs. Also,time history table columns were move closer together to facilitate printingoutput.replaced with a zero. The effect o f the embedded blank can be seen in thethird property curve in the printed output found in the manual. The properoutput, as provided by t he digitized test output, has a smoot her curve.

Finally, one instance of an embedded blank in the test input was

Installation on t he Cray required modification, because charact er variableswere mixed with non-character variables in common blocks. The idnt and titlecharacter variables were moved from /EQ/ and /SOILA/ common blocks to theirown blocks /EQc/ and /SOILAc/.The FACTOR output field of Option 2 was widened t o accommoda te larger valuesthat may be desired if one uses the FLUSH practice of entering lo w strainmoduli as Fc. The time history se quence check was disabled - we no longerpunch cards.SHAKE91 INSTALLATIONSHAKE91 was received a s source, executables, and test input and output. Theexecuta ble failed, with o r without t he extender provided. The source wasinstalled on pc with f771, on LANL Cray with cft77 and on SECC sgi3 with f77.Timing is 1:2:48 for Cray:sgi3:486/25.The followi ng problems were encountered on sgi3:

- sgi3 cannot output certain Hollerith const ants in format statements.seems associated with l ack of commas between constants. Commas wereinserted in SHAKE91 and SHAKE.- Common block alignment problems associated with ch aracter and realvariables in one block were corrected as in SHAKE. No alignmentproblems were noted from complex and real variables. Integer s are i * 4 .Retyping re als to r*8 would cause alignment problems.- Acceleration t/h file name read in with Option 3 must not have leadingblanks.- Test input option 7 had an extra blank line; removed.- Test last line did not read; replaced.- + ITERATION output caused overprint; added blank lines.- Frequency step in Option 10 different in test input vs output.

It

Introduced code to remove blanks.


38/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page B-4Considered a supplier mistake.

Additional changes:- Added code to take Poisson's ratio input in Option 2 in cols 66-75 f oreach layer and produce iterated soil property output suitable for S A S S 1input. User must insure consistency of units.- Stress/strain output is limited to 2049 steps.4096 with additional testing.- Usage modified like SHAKE:- Rearranged SHAKE91 routines like SHAKE and differenced the sources. Onlyone obvious difference: shake91 /time/ has t(9) which clearly shouldhave been t(2049). Changed to t(4096) which corrected frequency outputin the amplification option.

This was increased t o

Usage: shake91 tinput >output # t/h output on fil e "punch"

BLANK LINE HEADER I N PC MODULE OUTPUTModules SHAKE, HOUSEPLT, TRFILTER and RDTABLE are avail able on PC/DOS sy stemsas well as th e Cray. Their stdout output (to files by redirection) alwaysadds a blank line at the top on a PC, but not on the Cray. Thi s is immaterialas blank lin es in HOUSEPLT output are ignored by ANSYS.CUSTODIAL NOTESMoving compressed and tarred files such as sassiusr.tar and sassi .tar.Z withFTP should always be done in the binary mode.


39/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page C -1

Appendix C. Testing D e t a i l s


40/43

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page C-2

Appendix C. Testing Deta ils

Prior to RL installation, testing was carried out by Bechtel for SavannahRiver for 18 examples as discussed in the main body o f the report.validation report and example inputs were provided to WHC at the time of theRL Cray installation in 1991. Validation report examples 2, 5, 9, 11 , and 17as received from SRP were tested on the RL Cray and compared with t he reportresults and found acceptable.in-use tes ting sinc e they exercised all t he modules.differencing with reference output.a change of operating systems from Unicos 5.1 to 6.1.down to ill-conditioning: beams linking a rigid containme nt pad t o stickmodels representing containment and internals were much stiffer thannecessary. The problem was not with the code,was corrected, and the in-use test was revised accordingly.

The

Example 2and Example 9 Case 5 were adopted forIn-use testing includesExample 2later showed 10-20% changes atThe problem was tracedIt was with the model which

Installation on the INEL Cray in early 1994 passed the in-use test.a waste t ank model, identified herein as q8, produced anomalous behavior undercertain circumstances. Various tes ts with the model showed that anomalousresults were obtained if the number of structural blocks in the stiffnessmatrix is 1 in th e house output. If more than one block resulted, which couldresult from a smaller memory allocation, good results were obtained. Bechteland CEC personnel offered t o run the problem on the ir I B M RISC and Crayinstallations, and all produced good results. Thi s anomalous behavior wasrestricted t o the q8 model at INEL. An additional problem at I NEL , found byfixing the memory and running th e q8 1-block model, produced an OperationRange Error in the house module. A quick installation on the gamma machine atLANL proved good with one block in both the variable and fixed memoryconfigurations.For LANL installation, it was decided to run all 18 Bechtel test cases andcompare with RL output obtained by KEH in an effort following th e R L Crayinstallation (Luo 1994). Both in-use and q8 tests proved satisfactory.Testing with Bechtel validation cases proceded as follows.

However,

- Differenced KEH and SRS inputs, ok- Differenced KE H scripts against thos e generated with S RS- Ran KEH inputs at LANL with rdtable scripts- Differenced KEH/RL and LANL outputs after trfilter, hfilter and

tables input to rdtable, o k

smfilter on both outputs at sgi3. ok.It should be noted th at Example 12 needs 30 minutes and should not be abortedprematurely.An MWTF 180 model o f a buried waste t ank tested ok.hours t o run. Thi s model required threeTh e model caused anomalou s behavior with t he CEC ibm2 RISC demo


41/43

ve rs io n when combin was used t o add 4 more frequencre s u l t s . The model was se nt t o CEC.

WHC-SD-GN-CSWD-30036 Rev 1Page C-3es t o 12 f requency

An MWTF q t r model t e s t e d ok.da ta av a i la b l e f rom th e RL Cray as w el l as th e INEL Cray.model e x i s te d : f i l e s r l / i d a t RL/INEL and f i l e s l a n l / i n e l a t LANL/INEL.D i f fe r e n c e o f r l and id(1NEL) ou tp ut s were ok. D i f f e r e n c e o f i n el (1 N E L ) andLANL were ok.

Th is model re qu i re d 2 hours o f ru n t ime and hadTwo v a r i a n t s o f t h eT h i s g i v e s a c h a i n e d ok t o RL data .

U se rs a r e c a u t i o n e d t h a t t h e s o ur ce o f t h e anomalous r e s u l t s w i t h t h e INELi n s t a l l a t i o n was n ev e r i d e n t i f i e d , and c o ns e qu e nt ly i t cannot be argued thatt h e SASS1 c o d in g was d e f i n i t e l y n o t i n vo l ve d .SHAKE and SHAKE91 were t es te d s a t i s f a c t o r i l y w i t h t he examp les p ro v id ed w i ththe programs and descr ibed i n th e use r 's manuals . SHAKE91 punch f i l e s f romLANL, SECC and the PC p l a t f o r m s were c h ec ke d a g a i n s t t h e o u t p u t p r o v i d e d bythe vendor . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e soil p r o f i l e ana lyzed w i t h FLUSH (Winke l , 1991)was r e a n a l yz e d w i t h t h e Fc c o r r e l a t i o n i n SHAKE as shown i n t he example o fAppendix A. SHAKE91 was a ls o used w i t h t h e da ta.r e s u l t s i n Fig ure C.4 i s c on si de re d e x c e l l e n t .T e s t i n g t h e PC modules by t h e c us to di an i s somewhat cumbersome.o u t p u t s a r e f r o m t h e SECC Unix sys tems and show mino r d i f fe rences w i th the PCo u t p u t . To v ie w t h e d i f f e r e n c e s i n a reasonable manner, i t i s s ug ge ste d t h a tt h e r e f e r e n c e o u t p u t s i n t h e PC serve r k :\eow\sass i d i r e c t o ry have th e f i r s tc o l u m n r e m o v e d a f t e r t h e y a r e c o p i e d t h e r e w i t h s a s s i r e s . b a t .e s s e n t i a l l y c o n v er t s F o r t r a n c a r r a i g e c o n t r o l t o A S C II a r r ia g e c o n t r o l .A lso, th e hou sep l t .o ut f i l e has 0.0000E+OO terms which shou ld changed t o0 .0000bbbb (b=blank ) w i th a t e x t ed i t o r .d i f f e r e n c e d w i t h t h e r e f e r e n c e o u t pu t s.are best done on a Unix system. When found sat is fac tory , the PC o u t p u t ss h o u ld be m oved t o t h e r e f e r e n c e o u t p u t s i n t h e PC ser ve r k : \eow\sassid i r e c t o r y t o make i t e as y on t h e u s e r t o t e s t w i t h h i s own ma ch in e.

The compar ison o f th e th r eeThe reference

T h i sThen the PC ou tpu ts can beT h e m o d i f i c a t i o n s a n d d i f f e r e n c i n g


42/43


Figure C . l Example 2 Case 3 Transfer Function Magnitudesl 1 Node Frequency Number =30 2.9 Hz)

1583 -

2 t Unicos 5.1 \46

Stick-Pac Link Modulus, psf

Figure C . 2 Example 2 Case 2 Node 158x Spectra

0 W.RSpLMs61

ui9U

1.5

1 o

0.5

0.01 2Frequency, Hz


43/43


1%;5 -g -% -n -150

200

Figure C.3 20 Cycle Sine Response SpectraDamping- .02,0.05.0. IO,0.20 (decreasing response)

.m-0

-

-

Frequency. Hz

0

Figure C.4 SHAKE/FLUSH Comparison o f Iterated Soil Properties

100-r -= -$ -a -150 -200 -

m

8b J I F , , , *

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10

1994_SASSI System Software Configuration

Documents

Transcript of 1994_SASSI System Software Configuration