1983.01.28 - Stefan Marinov - Problems of Synchronization in Special Relativity, A Reply to G....

4
8/3/2019 1983.01.28 - Stefan Marinov - Problems of Synchronization in Special Relativity, A Reply to G. Cavalleri and G. Spinelli http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/19830128-stefan-marinov-problems-of-synchronization-in-special-relativity 1/4 Foundations of Physics, Vol. 13, No. 12, 1983 Problems of Synchronization in Special Relativity: A Reply to G. Cavalleri and G. Spinelli Stefan Marinov 1 Received January 28, 1983 I defend the opinion that Cavalleri and Spinelli, who in the last years aban- doned many of the relativity dogmas and embraced many of the absolute conceptions, are still very far from an adequte understanding and interpretation of physical reality. I was one of the referees of Cavalleri and Spinelli's paper (1) in the present issue of this journal, and my lengthy and detailed criticism is published in Ref. 2, p. 228. Of my 17 critical remarks, Cavalleri and Spinelli (C-S) have taken into account only two, viz. Nos. XIII and XVI, and introduced relevant corrections in their paper. The authors have not taken into account the remaining 15 remarks, which remain valid for the revised version of their paper. Here I should like to give only certain general statements: 1. THE MARINOV TRANSFORMATION At the present time there are three competitive space-time transfor- mations: those of Galilei, Lorentz, and Marinov. Which is the right one? But, first, concerning the names of the transformations: W as the trans- formation x' =x-Vt, t'= t, invented by Galilei? Certainly not. Greeks, Egyptians, and Chinese worked with this transformation, and when a Redskin in a reservation sees his boat at a distance x upwards in a river, he 1Laboratory for Fundamental Physical Problems, Sofia, Bulgaria. Present address: Niedersch6cklstr. 62, A-8044 Graz, Austria. 1241 0015-9018/83/1200 1241503.00/0 © 1983 Plenum Publishing Corporation

Transcript of 1983.01.28 - Stefan Marinov - Problems of Synchronization in Special Relativity, A Reply to G....

Page 1: 1983.01.28 - Stefan Marinov - Problems of Synchronization in Special Relativity, A Reply to G. Cavalleri and G. Spinelli

8/3/2019 1983.01.28 - Stefan Marinov - Problems of Synchronization in Special Relativity, A Reply to G. Cavalleri and G. Spinelli

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/19830128-stefan-marinov-problems-of-synchronization-in-special-relativity 1/4

Foundations o f Physics, Vol. 13, N o. 12, 1983

P r o b l e m s o f S y n c h r o n iz a tio n

in Special Relat ivi ty:

A Reply to G. Caval ler i and G. Spinel l i

S t e fa n M a r i n o v 1

Received January 28, 1983

I defend the opinion that Cavalleri and Spinelli , who in the last years aban-

doned m an y of the relativity dogmas and embraced m any o f the absolute

conceptions, are still very fa r fr om an adequte understanding and interpretation

of physical reali ty .

I wa s o n e o f t h e r e f e r e e s o f C a v a l l e r i a n d Sp i n e l l i ' s p a p e r (1) i n t h e p r e s e n t

i s su e o f t h is j o u r n a l , a n d m y l e n g t h y a n d d e t a i le d c r i t ic i s m i s p u b l i s h e d i n

R e f . 2 , p . 2 2 8 . O f m y 1 7 c ri t ic a l r e m a r k s , C a v a l l e r i a n d S p i n e ll i ( C - S ) h a v e

t a k e n i n to a c c o u n t o n l y t w o , v i z . N o s . X I I I a n d X V I , a n d i n tr o d u c ed

r e l e v a n t c o r r e c t i o n s i n t h e i r p a p e r . T h e a u t h o r s h a v e n o t t a k e n i n t o a c c o u n t

t h e r e m a i n i n g 1 5 r e m a r k s , w h i c h r e m a i n v a l i d f o r t h e re v i s e d v e r s i o n o f t h e i r

p a p e r . H e r e I s h o u l d l i k e t o g i v e o n l y c e r t a i n g e n e r a l s t a t e m e n t s :

1. T H E M A R I N O V T R A N S F O R M A T I O N

A t t h e p r e s e n t t i m e t h e r e a r e t h r e e c o m p e t i t i v e s p a c e - t i m e t r a n s f o r -

m a t i o n s : t h o s e o f G a l i l e i, L o r e n t z , a n d M a r i n o v . W h i c h is t h e r i g h t o n e ?

B u t , f ir s t, c o n c e r n i n g t h e n a m e s o f t h e t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s : W a s t h e tr a n s -

f o r m a t i o n x ' = x - V t , t ' = t, i n v e n t e d b y G a l i l e i ? C e r t a i n l y n o t . G r e e k s ,

E g y p t i a n s , a n d C h i n e s e w o r k e d w i t h t h i s t r a n s f o r m a t i o n , a n d w h e n a

R e d s k i n i n a r e s e r v a t i o n s e e s h i s b o a t a t a d i s t a n c e x u p w a r d s i n a r i v e r , h e

1Labora tory for Fund amen ta l Ph ysica l Prob lems, So f ia , Bulgar ia . Pres ent address:Niedersch6cklstr. 62, A-8044 Graz, Austria.

1241

0015-9018/83/1200 1241503.00/0 © 1983 Plenum Publishing Corporation

Page 2: 1983.01.28 - Stefan Marinov - Problems of Synchronization in Special Relativity, A Reply to G. Cavalleri and G. Spinelli

8/3/2019 1983.01.28 - Stefan Marinov - Problems of Synchronization in Special Relativity, A Reply to G. Cavalleri and G. Spinelli

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/19830128-stefan-marinov-problems-of-synchronization-in-special-relativity 2/4

1242 Marinov

kno ws ve r y we l l t ha t a f t e r a t im e t the d i s t a n c e wi l l be x- Vt , i f V is the

v e l o c i ty o f w a t e r. T h e L o r e n t z t r a n s f o r m a t i o n w a s p r o p o s e d f i rs t b y V o ig t.

T h e M a r i n o v t r a n s f o r m a t i o n w a s p r o p o s e d f i r s t n o t b y T a n g h e r l i n i , a s C - S

a s s e rt , b u t b y I v es . I a m s u r e, h o w e v e r , t h a t t h e I v es t r a n s f o r m a t i o n w i llr e m a i n i n p h y s i c s u n d e r m y n a m e f o r t h e fo l l o w i n g r e a s o n s ( se e R e f s. 3 - 5 ) .

1. I ga ve fi r s t t he t r a n s f o r m a t io n f o r m u la s f o r the ve loc i t i e s , i nc lud ing

those f o r l i gh t .

2 . I g a v e fi r st t h e c o n n e c t i o n b e tw e e n t h e L o r e n t z v e l o c i t y t r a n s f o r -

m a t i o n a n d t h e M a r i n o v v e l o c i t y t r a n s fo r m a t i o n .

3 . I show e d f ir s t t ha t t he a bso lu te ve lo c i ty v a nd the r e l a t ive ve lo c i ty

v ' a r e p h y s i c a l l y a d e q u a t e q u a n t i t ie s , w h i l e t h e L o r e n t z r e l a t iv e v e l o c i t y v [

( a t e r m i n t r o d u c e d b y m e f o r t h e r e l a t iv e v e l o c i t y i n t h e L o r e n t z tr a n s f o r -m a t i o n ) i s n o t a n a c t u a l v e l o c i t y , b u t a m a t h e m a t i c a l r e s u l t f o l lo w i n g f r o m

t h e a r t i f i c i a l l y i n t r o d u c e d r e l a t i v e t i m e i n t h e L o r e n t z t r a n s f o r m a t i o n .

4 . I s h o w e d f ir s t t h a t t h e M a r i n o v t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s f o r m a g r o u p .

5 . I s h o w e d f ir s t t h a t a n y p a r t i c l e is a t ta c h e d t o a b s o l u t e s p a c e

t h r o u g h i ts p r o p e r m a s s a n d t h u s t h a t t h e l in k o f t h e M a r i n o v t r a n s f o r m a t i o n

t o a b s o l u t e s p a c e i s n o t o n l y k i n e m a t i c a l , b u t a l s o d y n a m i c a l .

6 . I m a d e f i rs t a s t r o n g d i f fe r e n c e b e t w e e n t h e n o t i o n s " L o r e n t z

i n v a r i a n c e " ( a v a i l a b l e t o a n o b s e r v e r a t r e s t i n a b s o l u t e s p a c e w h o d e s c r i b e st h e m o t i o n o f a p a r t i c l e m o v i n g f i r st w i th v e l o c i t y v w i t h r e s p e c t t o a b s o l u t e

s p a c e a n d t h e n w i t h a n o t h e r v e lo c i t y v ' ) a n d " M a r i n o v i n v a r i a n c e "

( a va i l a b le w he n th e r e is a pa r t i c l e m ov in g wi th a c e r t a in ve loc i ty v in

a b s o l u t e s p a c e a n d a n o b s e r v e r w h o f i r s t i s a t r e s t w i t h r e s p e c t t o a b s o l u t e

s p a c e a n d t h e n m o v e s w i t h a v e l o c i t y V ) . F o r C - S , a s f o r a n y c o n t e m p o r a r y

p h y s i c i s t , if t h e v e l o c i t y b e t w e e n a p a r t i c l e a n d a n o b s e r v e r c h a n g e s , i t is o f

n o i m p o r t a n c e w h e t h e r t h e p a r t i c l e o r t h e o b s e r v e r c h a n g e s i t s v e l o c i t y .

M e a nwhi le the se two c a se s a r e no t ide n t i c a l , be c a use , i n the f i r s t c a se , t he

p a r t i c l e c h a n g e s i ts v e l o c i t y w i th r e s p e c t t o d i s t a n t m a t t e r a n d t h u s i t s t i m ee n e r g y c h a n g e s t o o , w h i le i n t h e s e c o n d c a s e t h e t i m e e n e r g y o f t h e p a r t i c l e

r e m a i n s u n c h a n g e d . I t i s i m p o r t a n t t o n o t e t h a t t h e L o r e n t z i n v a r i a n c e

c o n c e r n s 4 - s c a l a r s , w h i l e t h e M a r i n o v i n v a r i a n c e c o n c e r n s 3 - s c a l a r s .

7 . I s h o w e d th a t " l e n g t h c o n t r a c t i o n " ( o r " d i l a t i o n " ) i n t h e L o r e n t z

a n d M a r i n o v t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s i s n o t a p h y s i c a l e f fe c t b u t a r e s u l t o f t h e

p e c u l i a r c h a r a c t e r o f li g h t v e lo c i t y . [ N . B . : T h e r e a s o n i n g s o f C - S o n

" n o n i n s t a n t a n e o u s L o r e n t z c o n t r a c t i o n , " o n " a c c e l e r a t i o n o f t h e a t o m s , " e tc .

a r e c o m i c a l : T o p r o d u c e a c c e l e ra t i o n o f a t o m s a n d d e f o r m a t i o n o f c r y s t al s

o n e m u s t i n v e s t energy. W h e r e d o e s t h is e n e r g y c o m e f r o m ? F o r E i n s te i n th ec o n t r a c t i o n s a r e s e e m i n g , b u t f o r a n a b s o l u t i s t ( s u c h a s C - S ) t h e y m u s t b e

r e a l , phys ic a l . ]

Page 3: 1983.01.28 - Stefan Marinov - Problems of Synchronization in Special Relativity, A Reply to G. Cavalleri and G. Spinelli

8/3/2019 1983.01.28 - Stefan Marinov - Problems of Synchronization in Special Relativity, A Reply to G. Cavalleri and G. Spinelli

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/19830128-stefan-marinov-problems-of-synchronization-in-special-relativity 3/4

Sy nch ronization in Spe cial R elativity 1243

8 . I show ed tha t t he pecu l i a r cha rac t e r o f l i gh t ve loc i ty cons i s t s in t he

f o l l o w i n g . A c c o r d i n g t o t h e N e w t o n ( G a l i l e i , R e d s k i n ) c o n c e p t i o n s , t h e

ve loc i ty o f l i gh t in a m oving f ram e m us t be c ' = (c 2 - V2 sin 2 0) 1/2 - V co s 0,

w he re c i s t he ve loc i ty o f l i gh t i n abso lu t e space , V i s t he ve loc i ty o f t hem o v i n g f r a m e , a n d 0 i s t h e a n g l e b e t w e e n e ' a n d V . M e a n w h i l e , t h e

p h y s i c a l l y a d e q u a t e f o r m u l a f o r t h e v e l o c i t y o f l i g h t i n a m o v i n g f r a m e i s

c ' = c 2 / ( c + V cos 0 ) , and w i th t h is fo r m ula one can exp la in a l l expe r imen t s

a v a i l a b l e . U n t i l n o w I c o u l d n o t f i n d a n e x p l a n a t i o n f o r t h i s s t r a n g e f a c t ;

a n d , a s I a l w a y s n o t e , t h e d e d u c t i o n w h i c h I g i v e o f t h e M a r i n o v t r a n s f o r -

m a t i o n d o e s n o t sa t i s fy me .

N o w l et u s r e tu r n t o t h e q u e s t io n , " W h i c h o f th e t h re e t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s

i s t he r i gh t one?" The G a l i l e i t r ans fo rma t ion i s no t t rue , a s i t i s a

" r e l a t i v i s t i c " t r a n s f o r m a t i o n ; i t i s n o t a t t a c h e d t o a b s o l u t e s p a c e a n d o fim por t ance i s on ly t he re l a t i ve ve loc i ty be tw een b o th f ram es . Then i t f a i ls to

g i v e r i g h t a n s w e r s f o r h ig h v e l o ci ti es . I s h o w e d t h a t t h e L o r e n t z a n d M a r i n o v

t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s c a n b e m a t h e m a t i c a l l y r e c o n c i l e d , s i n c e i n t h e L o r e n t z

t rans fo rma t ion t ime i s r e l a t i ve and the ve loc i ty o f l i gh t abso lu t e , w h i l e i n t he

M a r i n o v t r a n s f o r m a t i o n t i m e i s a b s o l u t e a n d v e l o c i t y o f l i g h t r e l a t i v e . I

show ed th a t i f one ca l cu l a t e s co r rec t ly ( i.e ., i f one d iv ide s t he space

d i f fe ren t ia l s by the d i f fe ren t i a ls o f ab so lu t e t ime , an d no t , a s E ins t e in d id , by

t h e d i f fe r e n ti a l o f r e l a ti v e t im e ) , t h e n t h e s p a c e -t im e L o r e n t z t r a n s f o r m a t i o n

l e a d s t o t h e c o r r e c t v e l o c i t y t r a n s f o r m a t i o n . I h a v e e x p e r i m e n t a l l y s h o w ntha t r e l a t i ve l i gh t ve loc i ty and abso lu t e t ime a re phys i ca l l y adequa te quan-

t i t i e s . T h u s I h a v e d e m o n s t r a t e d t h a t t h e M a r i n o v t r a n s f o r m a t i o n i s t h e

p h y s i c a l l y a d e q u a t e o n e .

2 . S L O W T R A N S P O R T O F C L O C K S

M a n y ( n a iv e ! ) a b s o lu t i s ts t h i n k t h a t b y a s l o w t ra n s p o r t o f c lo c k s o n e

c a n r e a l iz e a N e w t o n i a n ( a b s o lu t e ) t im e s y n c h r o n i z a t i o n b e tw e e n s p a t i a ll yremote c locks i n a f rame moving in abso lu t e space w i th ve loc i ty V . Such w as

a l so t h e v i e w p o i n t o f T o r r a n d K o t e n (6) w h o e v e n c a r r i e d o u t a n e x p e r i m e n t ,

h o p i n g t o b e a b l e to m e a s u r e t h e E a r t h ' s a b s o l u t e v e l o c it y b y s e n d i n g o n e -

w a y e l e c t r o m a g n e t i c s i g n a l s b e t w e e n a b s o l u t e l y s y n c h r o n i z e d c l o c k s a n d

regis te r ing the f i rs t -order ( in V / c ) e f fec t s . In h i s t a lk a t t he In t e rna t iona l

C o n f e r e n c e o n S p a c e - T i m e A b s o l u t e n e s s ( G e n o a , J u l y 1 9 8 2 ) P r o f e s s o r T o r r

s a i d h e h a d a r r i v e d a t t h e c o n c l u s i o n t h a t d u r i n g t h e t r a n s p o r t t h e c l o c k

suf fe r s a t ime d i l a t i on such tha t t he expec t ed f i r s t -o rde r e f fec t i n t he

a n i s o t ro p i c l i g h t v e l o c it y w i ll b e c o m p e n s a t e d . H o w e v e r , T o r r w a s o f th eo p i n i o n t h a t a t h i r d - o r d e r e f f e ct m a y b e o b s e r v ed . A s h i s e x p e r i m e n t h a d

g iven a da i ly s inu so ida t e f fec t (ove r a d i s t ance o f 500 m ) co r re l a t ed t o

Page 4: 1983.01.28 - Stefan Marinov - Problems of Synchronization in Special Relativity, A Reply to G. Cavalleri and G. Spinelli

8/3/2019 1983.01.28 - Stefan Marinov - Problems of Synchronization in Special Relativity, A Reply to G. Cavalleri and G. Spinelli

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/19830128-stefan-marinov-problems-of-synchronization-in-special-relativity 4/4

1244 Marinov

sideral t i m e , h e a c c e p t e d i t a s a t h i r d - o r d e r e f f e c t a n d c a l c u l a t e d a n a b s o l u t e

E a r t h v e l o c i t y o f t h e o r d e r o f t e n s o f t h o u s a n d s o f k m / s e c . I s h o w e d (v) t h a t ,

w h e n w o r k i n g w i t h t h e M a r i n o v t r a n s f o r m a t i o n , t h e c o m p e n s a t i o n c o n t i n u e s

t o t h e t h i r d o r d e r i n V/c.C - S h a v e a l s o u n d e r s t o o d t h a t t h e r e is a c o m p e n s a t i o n o f t h e f i rs t - o r d e r

e f f e c t . B u t w h e n t h e y w r i t e , " T h e s e s i m p l e c o n s i d e r a t i o n s s e e m n o t y e t t o

h a v e b e e n u n d e r s t o o d b y M a r i n o v , " I c a n o n l y e x p r e s s m y r e g r e t t h a t t h e y

d i d n o t a t t en d t h e I C S T A c o n f e r e n c e i n G e n o a a n d t a k e p a r t in th e

d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e e n g i n e e r i n g a s p e c t o f th e p r o b l e m a n d i n t h e d i s c u s s io n n o

l o n g e r o f t h e f i r s t- o r d e r e f f e c t (t h e r e a l m o s t a ll g o o d s p a c e - t i m e s p e c i a li s ts

a r r i v e d a t t h e c o m p e n s a t i o n c o n c l u s i o n ) , b u t o f t h e t h i r d - o r d e r e ff e ct .

3 . E X P E R I M E N T A L M E A S U R E M E N T O F T H E E A R T H ' S A B S O L U T E

V E L O C I T Y

C - S r e p l a c e d t h e n a i v e e t h e r o f t h e 1 9 t h c e n t u r y b y a n e w e t h e r w h i c h i s

n o t n a i v e . V e r y g o o d . H o w e v e r , i n a n y e t h e r ( n a i v e o r n o n - n a i v e ) t h e

v e l o c i t y o f l i g h t i n a m o v i n g f r a m e m u s t b e d i r e c t i o n - d e p e n d e n t . T h u s , w i t h

t h e h e l p o f a r o t a t i n g s h a f t a n d t w o o p p o s i t e l y d i r e c t e d l i g h t b e a m s , o n e i s

a b l e t o m e a s u r e t h e E a r t h ' s a b s o l u t e v e l o c i t y . I m e a s u r e d t h i s v e l o c i t y

t w i c e ( 8'9 ) a n d c o n s t r u c t e d a t h i r d v e r y s i m p l e a p p a r a t u s f o r i ts

m e a s u r e m e n t . ~ t° ) C - S a s s e r t t h a t i f m y e x p e r i m e n t s g a v e p o s i t i v e r e s u lt s , I

s h o u l d a b a n d o n t h e " M a r i n o v t r a n s f o r m a t i o n " ( w h i c h p r e d ic t s t h o s e r es u lt s) .

S t r a n g e l o g i c ! B u t C - S a s s e r t t h a t m y e x p e r i m e n t s e e m s n o t t o b e r e l i a b l e ,

w i t h o u t s t a t i n g w h a t i s t h e p r e d i c t i o n o f their t he o r y . I t i s i n t e r e s t ing ,

h o w e v e r , t o n o t e t h a t w h e n I i n v i t e d P r o f e s s o r C a v a l l e r i t o s e e m y

e xp e r im e n t a n d to c h e c k i t s re l i a b i l i t y , he de c l ine d ( se e R e f . 2 , p . 236) .

R E F E R E N C E S

1. G . Cava lleri and G . Spinelli,Found. Phys. 13, 122 1 (1983).2. S. Marinov, The Thorny Way of Truth (East-West, Graz, 1982).3. S. Marinov, Found. Phys. 9, 445 (1979).4. S. Marinov, Eppur si Muove (Ce ntre Beige de Docu mentation Scientifique, Bruxelles,

1977, 2nd edn ., East-W est, G raz , 1981).5. S. Marinov, Classical Physics (East--West, Graz , 1981 .6. P. Ko len and D. G. To rr, Found. Phys. 12, 401 (i982).7. S. M arinov and J. P. Wesley,Proceedings of the International Conference on Space-Time

Absoluteness, Genoa, 8- 11 Ju ly, 1982 (East-West, Graz, 1982).8. S. Marinov, Czech. J. Phys. B 24, 965 (1974).

9. S. Marinov, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 12, 57 (1980).10. S. Marinov, Spec. Sci. TechnoL 3, 57 (1980).