1961 WL 20739 Page 1 [1961] A.C. 388 [1961] 2 W.L.R. 126 ... · PDF fileA.C. 956 considered;...

© 2010 Sweet & Maxwell

Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co (The Wagon Mound)

Also known as:Morts Dock & Engineering Co v Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd

Privy Council (Australia)

18 January 1961

Case Analysis

Where Reported [1961] A.C. 388; [1961] 2 W.L.R. 126; [1961] 1 All E.R. 404; [1961] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 1;100 A.L.R.2d 928; 1961 A.M.C. 962; (1961) 105 S.J. 85;

Case Digest

Subject: Damages

Keywords: Remoteness, Negligence

Catchphrases: Remoteness, escape of oil thought not to be dangerous

Abstract: A plaintiff can recover as damages for the negligence of the defendant compensation forresulting damage only if that damage could have been foreseen by a reasonable man. It is not enough that thedamage was a direct consequence of the negligent act. By the negligence of the defendant's servants large quant-ities of oil escaped into a harbour. The oil spread to a wharf owned by the plaintiff where, some floating cottonwaste acting as a wick, it was ignited by hot metal falling from oxy-acetylene welding there carried on. The firespread to the wharf and the equipment on it. The trial judge found that the plaintiff did not know, and could notreasonably be expected to have known, that the floating oil could be set alight, but that the damage to the wharfand equipment was a direct result of the escape of the oil.

Held, the defendant was not liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damage to the wharf and equip-ment Bourhill v Young [1943] A.C. 92 applied and King v Phillips [1953] 1 Q.B. 429 applied; Greenland vChaplin 155 E.R. 104 considered; Rigby v Hewitt 155 E.R. 103 considered; Hadley v Baxendale 156 E.R. 145considered; Smith v London & South Western Railway Co (1870-71) L.R. 6 C.P. 14 considered; Sharp v Powell(1871-72) L.R. 7 C.P. 253 considered; Cory & Son Ltd v France Fenwick & Co Ltd [1911] 1 K.B. 114 con-sidered; London, The [1914] P. 72 considered; Glasgow Corp v Muir [1943] A.C. 448 considered; and Woods vDuncan [1946] A.C. 401 considered; disapproving dictum of Lord Sumner in Weld-Blundell v Stephens [1920]A.C. 956 considered; Polemis and Furness Withy & Co Ltd, Re [1921] 3 K.B. 560 not followed.

Judges: Viscount SimondsSimonds, ViscountLord ReidReid, LordLord RadcliffeRadcliffe, LordLord Tucker-Tucker, LordLord Morris of Borth-y-GestMorris of Borth-y-Gest, Lord

1961 WL 20739 [1961] A.C. 388 [1961] 2 W.L.R. 126 [1961] 1 All E.R. 404 [1961] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 1 100 A.L.R.2d 928 1961A.M.C. 962 (1961) 105 S.J. 85 [1961] A.C. 388 [1961] 2 W.L.R. 126 [1961] 1 All E.R. 404 [1961] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 1100 A.L.R.2d 928 1961 A.M.C. 962 (1961) 105 S.J. 85

© 2010 Thomson Reuters.

http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=4651&FindType=g&SerialNum=1961017992

http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=4651&FindType=g&SerialNum=1961017992

http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y

















Appellate History

reversing

[1961] A.C. 388; [1961] 2 W.L.R. 126; [1961] 1 All E.R. 404; [1961] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 1; 100 A.L.R.2d 928; 1961A.M.C. 962; (1961) 105 S.J. 85

affirming

[1959] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 697

[1958] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 575

Related Cases

Significant Cases Cited

consideringGreenland v Chaplin155 E.R. 104; (1850) 5 Ex. 243Ex Ct

consideringRigby v Hewitt155 E.R. 103; (1850) 5 Ex. 240Ex Ct

not followingPolemis and Furness Withy & Co Ltd, Re[1921] 3 K.B. 560; (1921) 8 Ll. L. Rep. 351CA

disapprovingWeld-Blundell v Stephens[1920] A.C. 956HL

applyingKing v Phillips[1953] 1 Q.B. 429; [1953] 2 W.L.R. 526; [1953] 1 All E.R. 617; (1953) 97 S.J. 171CA

consideringLondon, The[1914] P. 72PDAD

considering













Sharp v Powell(1871-72) L.R. 7 C.P. 253CCP

applyingBourhill v Young[1943] A.C. 92; [1942] 2 All E.R. 396; 1942 S.C. (H.L.) 78; 1943 S.L.T. 105HL

consideringSmith v London & South Western Railway Co(1870-71) L.R. 6 C.P. 14Ex Chamber

consideringWoods v Duncan[1946] A.C. 401; (1946) 79 Ll. L. Rep. 211; 62 T.L.R. 283; [1947] L.J.R. 120; 174 L.T. 286HL

consideringCory & Son Ltd v France Fenwick & Co Ltd[1911] 1 K.B. 114; (1910) 80 L.J. K.B. 341CA

consideringHadley v Baxendale156 E.R. 145; (1854) 9 Ex. 341Ex Ct

consideringGlasgow Corp v Muir[1943] A.C. 448; [1943] 2 All E.R. 44; 1943 S.C. (H.L.) 3; 1944 S.L.T. 60HL

Cobb v Great Western Railway Co[1893] 1 Q.B. 459CA

Cox v Burbidge143 E.R. 171; (1863) 13 C.B. N.S. 430CCP

Polemis and Furness Withy & Co Ltd, Re(1921) 7 Ll. L. Rep. 196KBD

Horne v Midland Railway Co













(1872-73) L.R. 8 C.P. 131Ex Chamber

Bolton v Stone[1951] A.C. 850; [1951] 1 All E.R. 1078; [1951] 1 T.L.R. 977; 50 L.G.R. 32; (1951) 95 S.J. 333HL

Lynch v Knight11 E.R. 854; (1861) 9 H.L. Cas. 577HL

Grant v National Coal Board[1956] A.C. 649; [1956] 2 W.L.R. 752; [1956] 1 All E.R. 682; 1956 S.C. 48; 1956 S.C. (H.L.) 48; 1956 S.L.T.155; (1956) 100 S.J. 224HL

Malcolm v Dickson1951 S.C. 542; 1951 S.L.T. 357IH (2 Div)

Owners of the Steamship Gracie v Owners of the Steamship Argentino (The Argentino)(1889) L.R. 14 App. Cas. 519HL

Morrison Steamship Co Ltd v Owners of Cargo Lately Laden on Board the Greystoke Castle[1947] A.C. 265; [1946] 2 All E.R. 696; (1947) 80 Ll. L. Rep. 55; 63 T.L.R. 11; [1947] L.J.R. 297; 176 L.T. 66HL

Latham v R Johnson & Nephew Ltd[1913] 1 K.B. 398; [1912] W.N. 290CA

Smith v London & South Western Railway Co(1869-70) L.R. 5 C.P. 98CCP

Attorney General v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (No.1)[1923] 1 K.B. 59; (1922) 12 Ll. L. Rep. 305CA

Jones v Livox Quarries Ltd[1952] 2 Q.B. 608; [1952] 1 T.L.R. 1377; (1952) 96 S.J. 344CA

Haynes v Harwood[1935] 1 K.B. 146; [1934] All E.R. Rep. 103CA
















Liesbosch, The[1933] A.C. 449; [1933] All E.R. Rep. 144; (1933) 45 Ll. L. Rep. 123HL

Cobb v Great Western Railway Co[1894] A.C. 419HL

Metagama, The v Baron Vernon, The(1927-28) 29 Ll. L. Rep. 253; 1928 S.C. (H.L.) 21; 1928 S.L.T. 117HL

Pearson v Cox(1876-77) L.R. 2 C.P.D. 369CA

Read v J Lyons & Co Ltd[1947] A.C. 156; [1946] 2 All E.R. 471; (1947) 80 Ll. L. Rep. 1; (1946) 62 T.L.R. 646; [1947] L.J.R. 39; 175L.T. 413HL

Stansbie v Troman[1948] 2 K.B. 48; [1948] 1 All E.R. 599; 64 T.L.R. 226; 46 L.G.R. 349; [1948] L.J.R. 1206; (1948) 92 S.J. 167CA

Arpad, The (No.2)[1934] P. 189; (1934) 49 Ll. L. Rep. 313CA

Hyett v Great Western Railway Co (GWR)[1948] 1 K.B. 345; [1947] 2 All E.R. 264; 63 T.L.R. 411; [1947] L.J.R. 1243; 177 L.T. 178; (1947) 91 S.J. 434CA

Clinton v J Lyons & Co Ltd[1912] 3 K.B. 198KBD

Kilgollan v William Cooke & Co[1956] 1 W.L.R. 527; [1956] 2 All E.R. 294; (1956) 100 S.J. 359CA

Mehmet Dogan Bey v GG Abdeni & Co Ltd[1951] 2 K.B. 405; [1951] 2 All E.R. 162; [1951] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 433; [1951] 2 T.L.R. 30; (1951) 95 S.J. 415KBD

Victoria Laundry (Windsor) v Newman Industries[1949] 2 K.B. 528; [1949] 1 All E.R. 997; 65 T.L.R. 274; (1949) 93 S.J. 371CA
















Owners of the Steamship Gracie v Owners of the Steamship Argentino (The Argentino)(1888) L.R. 13 P.D. 191CA

Minister of Pensions v Chennell[1947] K.B. 250; [1947] L.J.R. 700; 176 L.T. 164KBD

Yorkshire Dale Steamship Co Ltd v Minister of War Transport[1942] A.C. 691; (1942) 73 Ll. L. Rep. 1; 1942 A.M.C. 1000HL

Rylands v Fletcher(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330HL

Hambrook v Stokes Bros[1925] 1 K.B. 141CA

Liesbosch, The[1932] P. 52; (1932) 42 Ll. L. Rep. 23CA

Clark v Chambers(1877-78) L.R. 3 Q.B.D. 327QBD

DPP v Smith (Jim)[1961] A.C. 290; [1960] 3 W.L.R. 546; [1960] 3 All E.R. 161; (1960) 44 Cr. App. R. 261; (1960) 124 J.P. 473;(1960) 104 S.J. 683HL

Donoghue v Stevenson[1932] A.C. 562; 1932 S.C. (H.L.) 31; 1932 S.L.T. 317; [1932] W.N. 139HL

Admiralty Commissioners v Owners of the SS Susquehanna[1926] A.C. 655; (1926) 25 Ll. L. Rep. 205; 42 T.L.R. 639; [1926] W.N. 200; 95 L.J. P. 128; 135 L.T. 456HL

Davies v Liverpool Corp[1949] 2 All E.R. 175; (1949) 113 J.P. 381; [1949] W.N. 268; (1949) 93 S.J. 373CA

Thurogood v Van Den Berghs & Jurgens Ltd[1951] 2 K.B. 537; [1951] 1 All E.R. 682; [1951] 1 T.L.R. 557; (1951) 115 J.P. 237; 49 L.G.R. 504; (1951) 95S.J. 317

















CA

Roe v Ministry of Health[1954] 2 Q.B. 66; [1954] 2 W.L.R. 915; [1954] 2 All E.R. 131; (1952) 96 S.J. 319CA

Notting Hill, The(1884) L.R. 9 P.D. 105CA

Smith v Green(1875-76) L.R. 1 C.P.D. 92CPD

Aldham v United Dairies (London) Ltd[1940] 1 K.B. 507CA

Oropesa, The[1943] P. 32; [1943] 1 All E.R. 211; (1942) 74 Ll. L. Rep. 86CA

Italian State Railways v Mavrogordatos[1919] 2 K.B. 305CA

Carmarthenshire CC v Lewis[1955] A.C. 549; [1955] 2 W.L.R. 517; [1955] 1 All E.R. 565; (1955) 119 J.P. 230; 53 L.G.R. 230; (1955) 99S.J. 167HL

Marpessa, The[1891] P. 403PDAD

Cases Citing This Case

appliedStephenson v Waite Tileman Ltd[1973] 1 N.Z.L.R. 152CA (NZ)

appliedGalt v British Railways Board(1983) 133 N.L.J. 870

appliedMcLoughlin v Grovers














[2001] EWCA Civ 1743; [2002] Q.B. 1312; [2002] 2 W.L.R. 1279; [2002] P.I.Q.R. P20; [2002] P.N.L.R. 21;Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

consideredKnightley v Johns[1982] 1 W.L.R. 349; [1982] 1 All E.R. 851; [1982] R.T.R. 182; (1982) 126 S.J. 101CA (Civ Div)

consideredOverseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Miller Steamship Co Pty Ltd (The Wagon Mound)[1963] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 402Sup Ct (NSW)

consideredTremain v Pike[1969] 1 W.L.R. 1556; [1969] 3 All E.R. 1303; 7 K.I.R. 318; (1969) 113 S.J. 812Assizes (Exeter)

approvedBradford v Robinson Rentals, Ltd[1967] 1 W.L.R. 337; [1967] 1 All E.R. 267; 1 K.I.R. 486; (1966) 116 N.L.J. 1658; (1967) 111 S.J. 33; Times,October 25, 1966Assizes (Devon)

appliedLamond v Glasgow Corp1968 S.L.T. 291OH

distinguishedStewart v West African Terminals[1964] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 371; (1964) 108 S.J. 838CA

appliedSlatter v British Railways Board[1966] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 395; 1 K.I.R. 336; (1966) 110 S.J. 688QBD

consideredGoodyear Tire & Rubber Co of Canada v MacDonald(1974) 51 D.L.R. (3d) 623Sup Ct (NS)

consideredJolley v Sutton LBC














[2000] 1 W.L.R. 1082; [2000] 3 All E.R. 409; [2000] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 65; [2000] 2 F.C.R. 392; (2001) 3 L.G.L.R.2; [2000] B.L.G.R. 399; [2000] P.I.Q.R. P136; (2000) 97(23) L.S.G. 42; Times, May 24, 2000; Official Tran-scriptHL

consideredYorkton Agricultural & Industrial Exhibition Association v Morley(1967) 66 D.L.R. (2d) 37CA (Civ Div)

followedCook v Swinfen[1967] 1 W.L.R. 457; [1967] 1 All E.R. 299; (1966) 110 S.J. 964CA

consideredBurke (James) v John Paul & Co[1967] I.R. 277Sup Ct

consideredHumber Oil Terminal Trustee Ltd v Owners of the Sivand[1998] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 97; [1998] C.L.C. 751CA (Civ Div)

appliedSayers v Perrin[1966] Qd. R. 89

appliedUpton v John Reid Partnership (A Firm)

consideredJones v Fabbi(1973) 37 D.L.R. (3d) 27Sup Ct (BC)

consideredThirkettle v Square D

appliedCorr v IBC Vehicles Ltd[2005] EWHC 895 (QB); [2006] P.I.Q.R. P11; Official TranscriptQBD

considered













Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd[1970] A.C. 1004; [1970] 2 W.L.R. 1140; [1970] 2 All E.R. 294; [1970] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 453; (1970) 114 S.J. 375HL

distinguishedSmith v Leech Brain & Co[1962] 2 Q.B. 405; [1962] 2 W.L.R. 148; [1961] 3 All E.R. 1159; (1962) 106 S.J. 77QBD

appliedLamb v Camden LBC[1981] Q.B. 625; [1981] 2 W.L.R. 1038; [1981] 2 All E.R. 408; (1981) 125 S.J. 356CA (Civ Div)

appliedSwami v Lo(1979) 105 D.L.R. (3d) 451Sup Ct (BC)

consideredPage v Smith[1996] A.C. 155; [1995] 2 W.L.R. 644; [1995] 2 All E.R. 736; [1995] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 95; [1995] R.T.R. 210;[1995] P.I.Q.R. P329; (1995) 92(23) L.S.G. 33; (1995) 145 N.L.J. 723; (1995) 139 S.J.L.B. 173; Times, May 12,1995; Independent, May 12, 1995; Lloyd's List, May 25, 1995HL

consideredAlston v Marine & Trade Insurance Co1964 (4) S.A. 112

consideredMorgan v Blunden(1986) 83 L.S.G. 705CA (Civ Div)

consideredWoolworths v Stirling (Henry)[1969] 1 A.C. 113; [1968] 3 W.L.R. 364; [1968] 1 All E.R. 81; (1968) 112 S.J. 622PC (Aus)

appliedDoughty v Turner Manufacturing Co[1964] 1 Q.B. 518; [1964] 2 W.L.R. 240; [1964] 1 All E.R. 98; (1964) 108 S.J. 53CA

consideredMeah v McCreamer (No.2)














[1986] 1 All E.R. 943; (1986) 136 N.L.J. 235QBD

distinguishedOman v McIntyre1962 S.L.T. 168OH

distinguishedOverseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Miller Steamship Co Pty Ltd (The Wagon Mound)[1967] 1 A.C. 617; [1966] 3 W.L.R. 498; [1966] 2 All E.R. 709; [1966] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 657; (1966) 110 S.J. 447PC (Aus)

followedWieland v Cyril Lord Carpets Ltd[1969] 3 All E.R. 1006QBD

consideredMcKew v Holland & Hannen & Cubitts (Scotland) Ltd1968 S.L.T. 12OH

consideredYumerovski v Dani(1978) 83 D.L.R. (3d) 558CC (Ont)

appliedHeaven v Mortimore(1967) 202 E.G. 615; 117 N.L.J. 326; Times, March 15, 1967QBD

Sample (Warkworth) v Alnwick DC(1984) 48 P. & C.R. 474; (1984) 271 E.G. 204; [1984] R.V.R. 180; [1984] J.P.L. 670Lands Tr

Essa v Laing Ltd[2003] I.C.R. 1110; [2003] I.R.L.R. 346; (2003) 100(18) L.S.G. 34; Times, April 7, 2003; Official TranscriptEAT

Director of Buildings and Lands v Shun Fung Ironworks Ltd[1995] 2 A.C. 111; [1995] 2 W.L.R. 404; [1995] 1 All E.R. 846; [1995] 1 E.G.L.R. 19; [1995] 19 E.G. 147;[1995] R.V.R. 124; [1995] E.G. 36 (C.S.); (1995) 145 N.L.J. 379; (1995) 139 S.J.L.B. 85; Times, February 27,1995PC (HK)















Australian Coastal Shipping Commission v Green[1971] 1 Q.B. 456; [1971] 2 W.L.R. 243; [1971] 1 All E.R. 353; [1971] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 16; (1971) 115 S.J. 57CA (Civ Div)

Banque Financiere de la Cite SA (formerly Banque Keyser Ullmann SA) v Westgate Insurance Co(formerly Hodge General & Mercantile Co Ltd)[1990] 1 Q.B. 665; [1989] 3 W.L.R. 25; [1989] 2 All E.R. 952; [1988] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 513; [1989] Fin. L.R. 1;(1989) 133 S.J. 817; Times, August 24, 1988; Independent, August 19, 1988; Financial Times, August 12, 1988CA (Civ Div)

Clare v Perry (t/a Widemouth Manor Hotel)[2005] EWCA Civ 39; (2005) 149 S.J.L.B. 114; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

T&N Ltd, Re[2005] EWHC 2870 (Ch); [2006] 1 W.L.R. 1728; [2006] 3 All E.R. 697; [2006] 2 B.C.L.C. 374; [2006] B.P.I.R.532; Official TranscriptCh D (Companies Ct)

Leong Bee & Co v Ling Nam Rubber Works[1970] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 247; (1970) 114 S.J. 806PC (Mal)

Pritchard v JH Cobden Ltd (No.1)[1988] Fam. 22; [1987] 2 W.L.R. 627; [1987] 1 All E.R. 300; [1987] 2 F.L.R. 30; [1987] Fam. Law 53CA (Civ Div)

Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (No.6)[2002] UKHL 19; [2002] 2 A.C. 883; [2002] 2 W.L.R. 1353; [2002] 3 All E.R. 209; [2002] 1 All E.R. (Comm)843; [2003] 1 C.L.C. 183; Times, May 21, 2002; Official TranscriptHL

Philpott v British Railways Board[1968] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 495QBD

Saleslease Ltd v Davis[1999] 1 W.L.R. 1664; [2000] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 883; (1999) 96(17) L.S.G. 24; (1999) 143 S.J.L.B. 121;Times, April 15, 1999CA (Civ Div)

P Perl (Exporters) Ltd v Camden LBC[1984] Q.B. 342; [1983] 3 W.L.R. 769; [1983] 3 All E.R. 161; (1980) 80 L.S.G. 2216; (1980) 77 L.S.G. 2216;(1983) 127 S.J. 581CA (Civ Div)

Attia v British Gas Plc


















[1988] Q.B. 304; [1987] 3 W.L.R. 1101; [1987] 3 All E.R. 455; (1987) 84 L.S.G. 2360; (1987) 137 N.L.J. 661;(1987) 131 S.J. 1248CA (Civ Div)

Total Transport Corp v Arcadia Petroleum Ltd (The Eurus)[1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 408; [1996] C.L.C. 1084QBD (Comm)

D Pride & Partners (A Firm) v Institute for Animal Health[2009] EWHC 685 (QB); [2009] N.P.C. 56; Official TranscriptQBD

Cross v Highlands & Islands Enterprise2001 S.L.T. 1060; 2001 S.C.L.R. 547; [2001] Eu. L.R. 256; [2001] I.R.L.R. 336; 2001 Rep. L.R. 26; 2000G.W.D. 40-1506OH

Devine v Colvilles Ltd[1969] 1 W.L.R. 475; [1969] 2 All E.R. 53; 1969 S.C. (H.L.) 67; 1969 S.L.T. 154; 6 K.I.R. 333; (1969) 113 S.J.287HL

Daressa, The[1971] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 60QBD (Admlty)

Iron and Steel Holdings and Realisation Agency v Compensation Appeal Tribunal and Cutts[1966] 1 W.L.R. 480; [1966] 1 All E.R. 769; (1966) 110 S.J. 227DC

Vacwell Engineering Co Ltd v BDH Chemicals Ltd[1971] 1 Q.B. 88; [1969] 3 W.L.R. 927; [1969] 3 All E.R. 1681; 7 K.I.R. 286; (1969) 113 S.J. 639QBD

Foster (otherwise Billington) v Maguire[2001] EWCA Civ 273; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

Banque Financiere de la Cite SA (formerly Banque Keyser Ullmann SA) v Westgate Insurance Co(formerly Hodge General & Mercantile Co Ltd)[1987] 2 W.L.R. 1300; [1987] 2 All E.R. 923; [1987] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 69; [1987] Fin. L.R. 134; (1987) 84 L.S.G.1965; (1987) 131 S.J. 775QBD (Comm)

McLoughlin v O'Brian[1981] Q.B. 599; [1981] 2 W.L.R. 1014; [1981] 1 All E.R. 809; (1981) 125 S.J. 169CA (Civ Div)


















Burton v Islington HA[1993] Q.B. 204; [1992] 3 W.L.R. 637; [1992] 3 All E.R. 833; [1992] 2 F.L.R. 184; [1992] 2 F.C.R. 845; [1992]P.I.Q.R. P269; [1993] 4 Med. L.R. 8; (1992) 89(17) L.S.G. 51; (1992) 142 N.L.J. 565; (1992) 136 S.J.L.B. 104;Times, March 25, 1992; Independent, April 8, 1992; Guardian, May 20, 1992CA (Civ Div)

Corr v IBC Vehicles Ltd[2008] UKHL 13; [2008] 1 A.C. 884; [2008] 2 W.L.R. 499; [2008] 2 All E.R. 943; [2008] I.C.R. 372; [2008]P.I.Q.R. P11; (2008) 105(10) L.S.G. 28; (2008) 152(9) S.J.L.B. 30; Times, February 28, 2008; Official Tran-scriptHL

Berg Sons & Co Ltd v Adams[1992] B.C.C. 661; [1993] B.C.L.C. 1045; [2002] Lloyd's Rep. P.N. 41; Financial Times, July 10, 1992QBD (Comm)

Reeves v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis[2000] 1 A.C. 360; [1999] 3 W.L.R. 363; [1999] 3 All E.R. 897; (2000) 51 B.M.L.R. 155; [1999] Prison L.R.99; (1999) 96(31) L.S.G. 41; (1999) 143 S.J.L.B. 213; Times, July 16, 1999; Independent, July 21, 1999; Offi-cial TranscriptHL

Gooden v Northamptonshire CC[2001] EWCA Civ 1744; [2002] P.N.L.R. 18; [2002] 1 E.G.L.R. 137; [2001] 49 E.G. 116 (C.S.); [2001] N.P.C.167; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

R. v James (Leslie)[2006] EWCA Crim 14; [2006] Q.B. 588; [2006] 2 W.L.R. 887; [2006] 1 All E.R. 759; [2006] 1 Cr. App. R. 29;[2006] Crim. L.R. 629; [2006] A.C.D. 36; (2006) 156 N.L.J. 240; (2006) 150 S.J.L.B. 130; Times, February 14,2006; Official TranscriptCA (Crim Div)

Dadourian Group International Inc v Simms (Damages)[2009] EWCA Civ 169; [2009] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 601; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

Boardman v Sanderson[1964] 1 W.L.R. 1317; (1961) 105 S.J. 152CA

British & Commonwealth Holdings Plc v Quadrex Holdings Inc[1995] C.L.C. 1169CA (Civ Div)

McKenzie's Tutrix v Edinburgh DC1979 S.L.T. (Sh. Ct.) 60






















Sh Pr

Murphy v Brentwood DC[1991] 1 A.C. 398; [1990] 3 W.L.R. 414; [1990] 2 All E.R. 908; [1990] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 467; 50 B.L.R. 1; 21Con. L.R. 1; (1990) 22 H.L.R. 502; 89 L.G.R. 24; (1991) 3 Admin. L.R. 37; (1990) 6 Const. L.J. 304; (1990)154 L.G. Rev. 1010; [1990] E.G. 105 (C.S.); (1990) 87(30) L.S.G. 15; (1990) 134 S.J. 1076; Times, July 27,1990; Independent, July 27, 1990HL

McLoughlin v O'Brian[1983] 1 A.C. 410; [1982] 2 W.L.R. 982; [1982] 2 All E.R. 298; [1982] R.T.R. 209; (1982) 79 L.S.G. 922;(1982) 126 S.J. 347HL

Runciman v Borders RC1987 S.C. 241; 1988 S.L.T. 135OH

Pryke v Gibbs Hartley Cooper Ltd[1991] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 602QBD (Comm)

SCM (United Kingdom) Ltd v WJ Whittall & Son Ltd[1971] 1 Q.B. 337; [1970] 3 W.L.R. 694; [1970] 3 All E.R. 245; (1970) 114 S.J. 706CA (Civ Div)

Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport[2008] R.V.R. 351; Official TranscriptLands Tr

Bank of Nova Scotia v Hellenic Mutual War Risk Association (Bermuda) Ltd (The Good Luck)[1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 514QBD (Comm)

Donaghey v Boulton & Paul Ltd[1968] A.C. 1; [1967] 3 W.L.R. 829; [1967] 2 All E.R. 1014; 2 K.I.R. 787; (1967) 111 S.J. 517HL

Sir Robert McAlpine & Sons v Minimax[1970] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 397; (1970) 114 S.J. 206QBD

Grieves v FT Everard & Sons Ltd[2006] EWCA Civ 27; [2006] 4 All E.R. 1161; [2006] I.C.R. 1458; (2006) 90 B.M.L.R. 88; (2006) 103(7)L.S.G. 25; (2006) 156 N.L.J. 185; (2006) 150 S.J.L.B. 164; Times, January 31, 2006; Independent, January 31,2006; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)



















Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Citibank NA[1997] A.C. 254; [1996] 3 W.L.R. 1051; [1996] 4 All E.R. 769; [1997] 1 B.C.L.C. 350; [1996] C.L.C. 1958;(1996) 93(46) L.S.G. 28; (1996) 146 N.L.J. 1722; (1997) 141 S.J.L.B. 5; Times, November 22, 1996; Independ-ent, November 27, 1996HL

EL Oldendorff & Co GmbH v Tradax Export SA (The Johanna Oldendorff)[1972] 3 W.L.R. 623; [1972] 3 All E.R. 420; [1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 292; (1972) 116 S.J. 616CA (Civ Div)

White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire[1999] 2 A.C. 455; [1998] 3 W.L.R. 1509; [1999] 1 All E.R. 1; [1999] I.C.R. 216; [1999] I.R.L.R. 110; (1999)45 B.M.L.R. 1; (1999) 96(2) L.S.G. 28; (1998) 148 N.L.J. 1844; (1999) 143 S.J.L.B. 51; Times, December 4,1998; Independent, December 9, 1998HL

McGovern v British Steel Corp[1986] I.C.R. 608; [1986] I.R.L.R. 411CA (Civ Div)

British Railways Board v Herrington[1972] A.C. 877; [1972] 2 W.L.R. 537; [1972] 1 All E.R. 749; (1972) 116 S.J. 178HL

Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd[1995] Q.B. 375; [1995] 2 W.L.R. 607; [1995] 2 All E.R. 769; [1995] L.R.L.R. 195; [1996] 5 Bank. L.R. 64;[1995] C.L.C. 410; 73 B.L.R. 47; [1995] E.C.C. 398; [1996] 5 Re. L.R. 23; [1995] 1 E.G.L.R. 129; [1995] 12E.G. 144; [1995] E.G. 31 (C.S.); (1995) 92(12) L.S.G. 34; (1995) 145 N.L.J. 343; (1995) 139 S.J.L.B. 56;[1995] N.P.C. 32; (1995) 69 P. & C.R. D37; Times, February 21, 1995; Independent, February 24, 1995CA (Civ Div)

Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd[1973] Q.B. 27; [1972] 3 W.L.R. 502; [1972] 3 All E.R. 557; 14 K.I.R. 75; (1972) 116 S.J. 648CA (Civ Div)

Lagden v O'Connor[2003] UKHL 64; [2004] 1 A.C. 1067; [2003] 3 W.L.R. 1571; [2004] 1 All E.R. 277; [2004] R.T.R. 24; [2004]Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 315; (2003) 153 N.L.J. 1869; (2003) 147 S.J.L.B. 1430; Times, December 5, 2003; OfficialTranscriptHL

European Gas Turbines Ltd (formerly Ruston Gas Turbines Ltd) v MSAS Cargo International Inc[2001] C.L.C. 880; Official TranscriptQBD

Bank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd (In Liquidation) v Price Waterhouse (No.2)[1997] B.C.C. 584; Times, February 10, 1997






















Ch D

Eckersley v Binnie18 Con. L.R. 1; [1955-95] P.N.L.R. 348CA (Civ Div)

Hughes v Lord Advocate[1963] A.C. 837; [1963] 2 W.L.R. 779; [1963] 1 All E.R. 705; 1963 S.C. (H.L.) 31; 1963 S.L.T. 150; (1963) 107S.J. 232HL

Draper v Hodder[1972] 2 Q.B. 556; [1972] 2 W.L.R. 992; [1972] 2 All E.R. 210; [1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 93; (1972) 116 S.J. 178CA (Civ Div)

Trecarrell, The[1973] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 402QBD (Admlty)

Sandeman Coprimar SA v Transitos y Transportes Integrales SL[2003] EWCA Civ 113; [2003] Q.B. 1270; [2003] 2 W.L.R. 1496; [2003] 3 All E.R. 108; [2003] 1 All E.R.(Comm) 504; [2003] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 172; [2003] 2 C.L.C. 551; [2003] R.T.R. 31; Times, February 13, 2003; Of-ficial TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

McKew v Holland & Hannen & Cubitts (Scotland) Ltd1969 S.C. 14; 1969 S.L.T. 101; 1968 S.L.T. (Notes) 99IH (2 Div)

Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialities Ltd[1986] Q.B. 507; [1985] 3 W.L.R. 993; [1985] 3 All E.R. 705; [1986] E.C.C. 225; (1986) 83 L.S.G. 117; (1985)135 N.L.J. 1106; (1985) 129 S.J. 855CA (Civ Div)

Jebson v Ministry of Defence[2000] 1 W.L.R. 2055; [2001] R.T.R. 2; [2000] I.C.R. 1220; [2000] P.I.Q.R. P201; (2000) 97(28) L.S.G. 32;Times, June 28, 2000; Independent, July 31, 2000; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

Thake v Maurice[1986] Q.B. 644; [1986] 2 W.L.R. 337; [1986] 1 All E.R. 479; (1986) 83 L.S.G. 123; (1986) 136 N.L.J. 92CA (Civ Div)

Banque Financiere de la Cite SA (formerly Banque Keyser Ullmann SA) v Westgate Insurance Co(formerly Hodge General & Mercantile Co Ltd)[1991] 2 A.C. 249; [1990] 3 W.L.R. 364; [1990] 2 All E.R. 947; [1990] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 377; (1990) 87(35)L.S.G. 36; (1990) 140 N.L.J. 1074; (1990) 134 S.J. 1265



















HL

Weymede Litho Printers Ltd v Runnymede BC[2002] R.V.R. 61; Official TranscriptLands Tr

Day v Haine[2007] EWHC 2691 (Ch); [2008] B.C.C. 199; [2008] I.C.R. 452; [2007] B.P.I.R. 1470; Times, December 28,2007; Official TranscriptCh D (Companies Ct)

Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd (No.1)[1986] A.C. 80; [1985] 3 W.L.R. 317; [1985] 2 All E.R. 947; [1985] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 313; [1986] F.L.R. 14;(1985) 82 L.S.G. 2995; (1985) 135 N.L.J. 680; (1985) 129 S.J. 503PC (HK)

Koufos v C Czarnikow Ltd (The Heron II)[1969] 1 A.C. 350; [1967] 3 W.L.R. 1491; [1967] 3 All E.R. 686; [1967] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 457; (1967) 111 S.J.848HL

Home Brewery Co v William Davis & Co (Leicester)[1987] Q.B. 339; [1987] 2 W.L.R. 117; [1987] 1 All E.R. 637; (1987) 84 L.S.G. 657; (1987) 131 S.J. 102;Times, August 13, 1986QBD

Robinson v Post Office[1974] 1 W.L.R. 1176; [1974] 2 All E.R. 737; 16 K.I.R. 12; (1973) 117 S.J. 915CA (Civ Div)

Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (No.6)[2001] 3 W.L.R. 1117; [2001] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 557; [2001] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 161; [2001] C.L.C. 262; (2000)97(48) L.S.G. 37; (2001) 145 S.J.L.B. 5; Times, November 21, 2000; Daily Telegraph, November 21, 2000; Of-ficial TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

Lampitt v Poole BC[1991] 2 Q.B. 545; [1990] 3 W.L.R. 179; [1990] 2 All E.R. 887; 49 B.L.R. 82CA (Civ Div)

Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather Plc[1993] Env. L.R. 116; Times, October 23, 1991QBD

Jolley v Sutton LBC[1998] 1 W.L.R. 1546; [1998] 3 All E.R. 559; [1998] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 240; [1998] 3 F.C.R. 443; [1998] P.I.Q.R.P377; (1998) 95(28) L.S.G. 31; (1998) 148 N.L.J. 1014; (1998) 142 S.J.L.B. 188; Times, June 23, 1998; Inde-


















pendent, June 25, 1998CA (Civ Div)

Barings Plc (In Liquidation) v Coopers & Lybrand (No.7)[2003] EWHC 1319 (Ch); [2003] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 566; [2003] P.N.L.R. 34; Official TranscriptCh D

Owners of Cargo Lately Laden on Board the Playa Larga v Owners of the I Congreso del Partido[1978] Q.B. 500; [1977] 3 W.L.R. 778; [1978] 1 All E.R. 1169; [1977] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 536QBD (Admlty)

R v Croydon HA[1998] P.I.Q.R. Q26; [1998] Lloyd's Rep. Med. 44; (1998) 40 B.M.L.R. 40; Times, December 13, 1997; Inde-pendent, December 4, 1997CA (Civ Div)

Parsons (Livestock) Ltd v Uttley Ingham & Co Ltd[1978] Q.B. 791; [1977] 3 W.L.R. 990; [1978] 1 All E.R. 525; [1977] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 522; (1977) 121 S.J. 811CA (Civ Div)

Aneco Reinsurance Underwriting Ltd (In Liquidation) v Johnson & Higgins Ltd[2001] UKHL 51; [2001] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 929; [2002] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 157; [2002] C.L.C. 181; [2002] Lloyd'sRep. I.R. 91; [2002] P.N.L.R. 8; Official TranscriptHL

Lonrho Plc v Al-Fayed (No.1)[1990] 2 Q.B. 479; [1989] 3 W.L.R. 631; [1989] 2 All E.R. 65; (1989) 5 B.C.C. 411; [1989] B.C.L.C. 485;[1989] P.C.C. 215; (1989) 139 N.L.J. 539CA (Civ Div)

Booker v Wenborn[1962] 1 W.L.R. 162; [1962] 1 All E.R. 431; (1961) 105 S.J. 1125CA

Waddington v Buchan Poultry Products Ltd (No.2)1963 S.L.T. 168IH (1 Div)

Page v Smith[1994] 4 All E.R. 522; [1994] R.T.R. 293; [1995] P.I.Q.R. P58; (1994) 144 N.L.J. 756; Times, May 4, 1994CA (Civ Div)

JP Morgan Chase Bank v Springwell Navigation Corp[2005] EWHC 1044 (Comm); Official TranscriptQBD (Comm)

Murphy v William Henderson & Sons[1963] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 43; (1963) 107 S.J. 534


















CA

Videan v British Transport Commission[1963] 2 Q.B. 650; [1963] 3 W.L.R. 374; [1963] 2 All E.R. 860; (1963) 107 S.J. 458CA

Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings[1976] Q.B. 225; [1975] 3 W.L.R. 286; [1975] 3 All E.R. 314; [1975] R.T.R. 528; (1975) 119 S.J. 559CA (Civ Div)

Barber v Somerset CC[2002] EWCA Civ 76; [2002] 2 All E.R. 1; [2002] I.C.R. 613; [2002] I.R.L.R. 263; [2002] Emp. L.R. 288;[2002] P.I.Q.R. P21; (2002) 68 B.M.L.R. 115; (2002) 99(12) L.S.G. 34; (2002) 146 S.J.L.B. 43; Times, Febru-ary 12, 2002; Independent, February 13, 2002; Daily Telegraph, February 14, 2002; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

Essa v Laing Ltd[2004] EWCA Civ 2; [2004] I.C.R. 746; [2004] I.R.L.R. 313; (2004) 148 S.J.L.B. 146; Times, January 29, 2004;Independent, January 23, 2004; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

Curran v Scottish Gas Board1970 S.L.T. (Notes) 33OH

Platform Home Loans Ltd v Oyston Shipways Ltd[2000] 2 A.C. 190; [1999] 2 W.L.R. 518; [1999] 1 All E.R. 833; [1999] C.L.C. 867; (1999) 1 T.C.L.R. 18;[1999] P.N.L.R. 469; [1999] 1 E.G.L.R. 77; [1999] 13 E.G. 119; [1999] E.G. 26 (C.S.); (1999) 96(10) L.S.G. 31;(1999) 149 N.L.J. 283; (1999) 143 S.J.L.B. 65; [1999] N.P.C. 21; Times, February 19, 1999; Independent,March 5, 1999HL

Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc v Inland Revenue Commissioners[2005] EWCA Civ 78; [2006] Ch. 243; [2006] 2 W.L.R. 103; [2005] 3 All E.R. 1025; [2005] S.T.C. 329; [2005]Eu. L.R. 553; [2005] B.T.C. 126; 7 I.T.L. Rep. 476; [2005] S.T.I. 194; (2005) 102(10) L.S.G. 30; [2005] N.P.C.18; Times, February 15, 2005; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

Ward v Cannock Chase DC[1986] Ch. 546; [1986] 2 W.L.R. 660; [1985] 3 All E.R. 537; 84 L.G.R. 898; (1986) 83 L.S.G. 1553; (1986) 130S.J. 316Ch D

Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman[1955-95] P.N.L.R. 238; 157 C.L.R. 424; (1985) 60 A.L.R. 1; (1985) 59 A.L.J.R. 564; (1986) 2 Const. L.J. 161HC (Aus)





















Chadwick v British Railways Board[1967] 1 W.L.R. 912; [1967] 2 All E.R. 945; (1967) 111 S.J. 562QBD

Wood v Bentall Simplex Ltd[1992] P.I.Q.R. P332; Times, March 3, 1992CA (Civ Div)

Devine v Colvilles Ltd1967 S.L.T. 89OH

Pratley v Surrey CC[2003] EWCA Civ 1067; [2004] I.C.R. 159; [2003] I.R.L.R. 794; [2004] P.I.Q.R. P17; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

EL Oldendorff & Co GmbH v Tradax Export SA (The Johanna Oldendorff)[1974] A.C. 479; [1973] 3 W.L.R. 382; [1973] 3 All E.R. 148; [1973] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 285; (1973) 117 S.J. 760HL

Aneco Reinsurance Underwriting Ltd (In Liquidation) v Johnson & Higgins Ltd[2000] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 129; [1999] C.L.C. 1918; [2000] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 12; [2000] Lloyd's Rep. P.N. 1;[2000] P.N.L.R. 152; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

Baker v Willoughby[1969] 2 W.L.R. 489; [1969] 2 All E.R. 549; 6 K.I.R. 5; (1968) 113 S.J. 37; Times, December 11, 1968CA (Civ Div)

West v Hughes of Beaconsfield Ltd[1971] R.T.R. 298; Times, February 23, 1971QBD

Alegrete Shipping Co Inc v International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund 1971 (The Sea Empress)[2003] EWCA Civ 65; [2003] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 1; [2003] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 327; [2003] 1 C.L.C. 325; (2003)100(13) L.S.G. 27; [2003] Env. L.R. D11; Times, February 27, 2003; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

Australian Coastal Shipping Commission v Green[1970] 2 W.L.R. 1071; [1970] 1 All E.R. 968; [1970] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 209QBD (Comm)

McTear v Imperial Tobacco Ltd2005 2 S.C. 1; 2005 G.W.D. 20-365; Times, June 14, 2005OH

Singh v Glasgow Corp1962 S.L.T. (Notes) 6

















OH

McMillan v BP Refinery (Grangemouth) Ltd1961 S.L.T. (Notes) 79IH (2 Div)

Warren v Scruttons[1962] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 497QBD

Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather Plc[1994] 2 A.C. 264; [1994] 2 W.L.R. 53; [1994] 1 All E.R. 53; [1994] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 261; [1994] Env. L.R. 105;[1993] E.G. 211 (C.S.); (1994) 144 N.L.J. 15; (1994) 138 S.J.L.B. 24; Times, December 10, 1993; Independent,December 10, 1993HL

Daraydan Holdings Ltd v Solland International Ltd[2004] EWHC 622 (Ch); [2005] Ch. 119; [2004] 3 W.L.R. 1106; [2005] 4 All E.R. 73; [2004] W.T.L.R. 815;[2004] N.P.C. 49; Official TranscriptCh D

Rookes v Barnard (No.1)[1963] 1 Q.B. 623; [1962] 3 W.L.R. 260; [1962] 2 All E.R. 579; (1962) 106 S.J. 371CA

Heyting v Dupont[1964] 1 W.L.R. 843; [1964] 2 All E.R. 273; (1964) 108 S.J. 277CA

SCM (United Kingdom) Ltd v WJ Whittall & Son Ltd[1970] 1 W.L.R. 1017; [1970] 2 All E.R. 417; 8 K.I.R. 1073; (1970) 114 S.J. 268QBD

Slipper v BBC[1991] 1 Q.B. 283; [1990] 3 W.L.R. 967; [1990] 1 All E.R. 165; (1990) 134 S.J. 1042CA (Civ Div)

Grieves v FT Everard & Sons Ltd[2007] UKHL 39; [2008] 1 A.C. 281; [2007] 3 W.L.R. 876; [2007] 4 All E.R. 1047; [2007] I.C.R. 1745; [2008]P.I.Q.R. P6; [2008] LS Law Medical 1; (2008) 99 B.M.L.R. 139; (2007) 104(42) L.S.G. 34; (2007) 157 N.L.J.1542; (2007) 151 S.J.L.B. 1366; Times, October 24, 2007; Official TranscriptHL

McKillen v Barclay Curle & Co Ltd1967 S.L.T. 41IH (1 Div)

Baker v Willoughby


















[1970] A.C. 467; [1970] 2 W.L.R. 50; [1969] 3 All E.R. 1528; 7 K.I.R. 457; (1970) 114 S.J. 15HL

Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman[1990] 2 A.C. 605; [1990] 2 W.L.R. 358; [1990] 1 All E.R. 568; [1990] B.C.C. 164; [1990] B.C.L.C. 273;[1990] E.C.C. 313; [1955-95] P.N.L.R. 523; (1990) 87(12) L.S.G. 42; (1990) 140 N.L.J. 248; (1990) 134 S.J.494; Times, February 12, 1990; Independent, February 16, 1990; Financial Times, February 13, 1990; Guardian,February 15, 1990; Daily Telegraph, February 15, 1990HL

Clark v Kirby Smith[1964] Ch. 506; [1964] 3 W.L.R. 239; [1964] 2 All E.R. 835; [1964] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 172; (1964) 108 S.J. 462Ch D

British Celanese Ltd v AH Hunt (Capacitors) Ltd[1969] 1 W.L.R. 959; [1969] 2 All E.R. 1252; (1969) 113 S.J. 368QBD

Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Morris (t/a Soundstar Studio)[2004] EWCA Civ 172; [2004] Env. L.R. 41; (2004) 148 S.J.L.B. 266; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

Hartman v South Essex Mental Health and Community Care NHS Trust[2005] EWCA Civ 6; [2005] I.C.R. 782; [2005] I.R.L.R. 293; [2005] E.L.R. 237; [2005] P.I.Q.R. P19; (2005) 85B.M.L.R. 136; (2005) 149 S.J.L.B. 115; Times, January 21, 2005; Independent, January 25, 2005; Official Tran-scriptCA (Civ Div)

Yeoman Credit v Odgers Vospers Motor House (Plymouth) (Third Party)[1962] 1 W.L.R. 215; [1962] 1 All E.R. 789; (1962) 106 S.J. 75CA

Hughes v Lord Advocate1961 S.C. 310; 1962 S.L.T. 90IH (1 Div)

Alegrete Shipping Co Inc v International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund 1971 (The Sea Empress)[2002] EWHC 1095 (Admlty); [2002] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 416; [2003] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 123; [2003] Env. L.R. 8;[2003] Env. L.R. D2; Official TranscriptQBD (Admlty)

Sanders v Parry[1967] 1 W.L.R. 753; [1967] 2 All E.R. 803; (1967) 111 S.J. 296Assizes

Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (No.6)[2000] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 360; (2000) 97(23) L.S.G. 44; Times, May 31, 2000; Official Transcript




















QBD (Comm)

Dunn v Maxwell1961 S.L.T. (Notes) 27OH

Burden v Watson1961 S.L.T. (Notes) 67OH

Corr v IBC Vehicles Ltd[2006] EWCA Civ 331; [2007] Q.B. 46; [2006] 3 W.L.R. 395; [2006] 2 All E.R. 929; [2006] I.C.R. 1138;(2006) 103(16) L.S.G. 24; Times, April 21, 2006; Independent, April 6, 2006; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Hall Russell & Co Ltd (The Esso Bernicia)1988 S.L.T. 33IH (1 Div)

Weller & Co v Foot & Mouth Disease Research Institute[1966] 1 Q.B. 569; [1965] 3 W.L.R. 1082; [1965] 3 All E.R. 560; [1965] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 414; (1965) 109 S.J.702QBD

Building and Civil Engineering Holidays Scheme Management Ltd v Post Office[1966] 1 Q.B. 247; [1965] 2 W.L.R. 72; [1965] 1 All E.R. 163; (1964) 108 S.J. 939; Times, November 18, 1964;Guardian, November 18, 1964CA

Simmons v British Steel Plc[2004] UKHL 20; 2004 S.C. (H.L.) 94; 2004 S.L.T. 595; 2004 S.C.L.R. 920; [2004] I.C.R. 585; [2004] P.I.Q.R.P33; (2004) 148 S.J.L.B. 540; 2004 G.W.D. 14-315; Times, May 4, 2004; Official TranscriptHL

Mirant Asia-Pacific Construction (Hong Kong) Ltd v Ove Arup & Partners International Ltd[2007] EWHC 918 (TCC); [2007] C.I.L.L. 2480; [2008] Bus. L.R. D1; Official TranscriptQBD (TCC)

McManus v Beckham[2002] EWCA Civ 939; [2002] 1 W.L.R. 2982; [2002] 4 All E.R. 497; [2002] E.M.L.R. 40; (2002) 99(35)L.S.G. 36; (2002) 146 S.J.L.B. 183; Times, July 11, 2002; Independent, July 12, 2002; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)

McLinden v Richardson1962 S.L.T. (Notes) 104OH

Owners of the Walumba v Australian Coastal Shipping Commission (The Walumba)


















[1965] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 121; 111 C.L.R. 303HC (Aus)

Singh v Aitken[1998] P.I.Q.R. Q37CC (Middlesbrough)

East Ham Corp v Bernard Sunley & Sons[1966] A.C. 406; [1965] 3 W.L.R. 1096; [1965] 3 All E.R. 619; [1965] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 425; 64 L.G.R. 43; (1965)109 S.J. 874HL

Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd (No.1)[1984] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 555CA (HK)

Lane v Holloway[1968] 1 Q.B. 379; [1967] 3 W.L.R. 1003; [1967] 3 All E.R. 129; (1967) 111 S.J. 655CA (Civ Div)

Distillers Co (Biochemicals) Ltd v Thompson (Laura Anne)[1971] A.C. 458; [1971] 2 W.L.R. 441; [1971] 1 All E.R. 694; (1971) 115 S.J. 144PC (Aus)

Karak Rubber Co Ltd v Burden (No.2)[1972] 1 W.L.R. 602; [1972] 1 All E.R. 1210; [1972] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 73; (1971) 115 S.J. 887Ch D

Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No.3)[1968] 1 W.L.R. 1555; [1968] 2 All E.R. 1073; [1968] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 289; (1968) 112 S.J. 744Ch D

Bailey v Derby Corp[1965] 1 W.L.R. 213; [1965] 1 All E.R. 443; (1965) 129 J.P. 140; 63 L.G.R. 36; (1965) 16 P. & C.R. 192;[1965] R.V.R. 43; (1964) 108 S.J. 939CA

O'Kane v Jones (The Martin P)[2003] EWHC 3470 (Comm); [2004] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 389; [2005] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 174; Official TranscriptQBD (Comm)

McKillen v Barclay Curle & Co Ltd1965 S.L.T. (Notes) 19OH

Journal Articles

Foreseeable loss?
















Causation, Contributory negligence, Duty of care, Foreseeability, Impecuniosity, Loss, Measure of damages,Professional negligenceN.L.J. 2009, 159(7362), 454-455

Damages for self harm after suffering tortious injury (suicide and contributory negligence)Causation, Contributory negligence, Depression, Fatal accident claims, Post-traumatic stress disorder, Self-harm, SuicideJ.P.I. Law 2009, 1, 20-40

Psychiatric injury: (over)turning the Page?Foreseeability, Personal injury, Primary victims, Psychiatric harm, Road traffic accidents, Secondary victimsP.I.L.J. 2008, 62(Feb), 21-24

The doctrine of precedent and the provocation defence: a comment on R v JamesPrecedent, ProvocationM.L.R. 2006, 69(5), 819-831

Provocation ping-pong?Court of Appeal, House of Lords, Precedent, Privy Council, ProvocationN.L.J. 2006, 156(7213), 299-300

The forecast predicts legal liabilitiesClimate change, Development, ForeseeabilityE.G. 2005, 0545, 160-162

Reforming liability for psychiatric injury in Scotland: a recipe for uncertaintyDamages, Psychiatric harm, Public policy, Scotland, Scottish Law Commission, Secondary victimsM.L.R. 2005, 68(6), 983-995

The foreseeability of work-related suicideAccidents, Duty of care, Employers liabilities, Foreseeability, Remoteness, SuicideN.L.J. 2005, 155(7184), 1052-1053

Charges over book debts: the Spectrum case in the Court of AppealBook debts, Debentures, Fixed charges, Floating charges, Liquidation, PrioritiesJ.B.L. 2004, Nov, 581-616

Secondary iatrogenic harm: claims for psychiatric damage following a death caused by medical errorClinical negligence, Damages, Death, Psychiatric harm, Relatives, Secondary victimsM.L.R. 2004, 67(4), 561-587

Empire's law - sun sinks lowerCommonwealth, Courts, New Zealand, Privy CouncilN.L.J. 2003, 153(7104), 1689

Business interruption: preparing for the unknownCompanies, Contractual liability, Employers liabilities, Finance, Insurance, Negligence, Occupiers liability, Riskmanagement, Terrorism



http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=6835&FindType=Y&SerialNum=0115875471

http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=100309&FindType=Y&SerialNum=0115832793

P.L.C. 2003, 14(7), 13-24

Lost causes in the House of Lords: Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral ServicesAsbestosis, Causation, Employers liabilities, Joint tortfeasorsM.L.R. 2003, 66(2), 277-284

Remoteness of damage: the duty-interest theory and the re-interpretation of the Wagon Mound.Duty of care, Foreseeability, Negligence, Personal injury, RemotenessL.S. 1989, 9(1), 1-15

END OF DOCUMENT



1961 WL 20739 Page 1 [1961] A.C. 388 [1961] 2 W.L.R. 126 ... · PDF fileA.C. 956 considered;...

Documents

Transcript of 1961 WL 20739 Page 1 [1961] A.C. 388 [1961] 2 W.L.R. 126 ... · PDF fileA.C. 956 considered;...