1947 CUMULAT.IVE SUPPLEMENT TO VOLUME D, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1941

On petition for certiorari. to review Order granting motion to dismiss bill of complaint, supreme court cannot consider question not presented to the lower court by the allegations of the bill of complaint. Nelms v. St. Peters­burg, 149 Fla. 197, 5 So. (2d) 408.

Where there were three petitions for inter­locutory certiorari under rules 27, 28, and 34 to review orders of the circuit court in equity denying motions to quash servi~e of process by publication and service made upon a.' resident agent of nonresident ancillary executors under § 48.01 et seq., it was held that the nature and contents of the orders and .decrees to be ren­dered were not· for consideration by the supreme court. Gribbel v. Henderson, 151 Fla. 712, 10 So. (2d) 734, · 736;~ See Royalty v. Florid.a. Nat. Bank, 127 Fla. 618, 173 So. 689. ·

Certiorari under this rule does not lie to get the supreme court to review by common law certiorari a J flnal decree in equity in divorce proceedings, for · the ·review of which an ade­quate remedy was afforded by' appeal. Lorenz v. Lorenz, 152 Fla. 779, 13 So. <2d) 806, 807. See Lorenz v. ·Lorenz, 152 Fla. 69, 778 13 So. (2d> 805; ' ,. .

Petition denied where no error found.-Wher'e a ' cause was submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the order or final decree dismissing J the· bill of complaint, and briefs, and no error was found in the record, tb.e petition for certiorari uhder this rule was denied. First Nat. Bank v. ' Davis, 152 Fla.. 10, 10 So. (2d) 435,· 436. See also, Hunter v. Tyner, 151 Fla. 707, 10 So. (2d) 492. .

Where a bill of complaint was not entirely without equity, and it reasonably appeared nec­essary to the chancellor to grant an injunction without notice, it was held that there was no' reversible error 'in granting an injunction with­out notice and without bond and certiorari was properly denied. Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Wil­liams, 152 Fla. 53, 10 So. (2d) 714, 715.

Orders held interlocutory. See Miami Bridge Co. v. Miami Beach Ry. Co.,

152 Fla. 458, 12 So. (2d) 438.

Order ·held to be final. · See Saffran v. Adler, 152 Fla. 405, 12 So. (2d) 124; Hollywood v. Clark, 153 Fla.. 501, 15 So. (2d) 175.

Appeal from an 9rder denying a motion to vacate and set aside a final decree of divorce was dismissed by the supreme court on it:S own· motion requiring that such or<lers be reviewed by petition for interlocutory certiorari and not by appeal. Krajci v. Krajci, 157 Fla. 193, 25 So. (2d) 380:

Questions considered although rule disregard­ed.--Sele also Randall v. R.landallt 158 Fla. 502, 29 So. (2d) 238.

Applied in Bie v. Hulet, 149 Fla. 227, 5 So. (2d) 457; -Holland v. Roberts, 149 Fia. 308, 5 So. (2d) 608; St. Joseph Tel. etc., Co. v. South­eastern Tel. Co., 149 Fla. 14, 5 So. (2d) 55;

General Properties Co. v. Rellim Inv. Fla. 136, 9 So. (2d) 295; Todd v. Fla. 134, 9 So. (2d) 279; Brickell v 152 Fla. 429, 12 So. (2d) 782; ler, 152 Fla. 428, 12 So. (2d) 117; v .f Guaranty Title Co., 153 Fla. 379, 15 So. J <2d> 754, 149 AL.R. 1029; Bufton v. Pope, 153'\ Fla. • 708, 15 So. (2d) 611; Cohn v. Cohn, 151 Fla. 547, 10 So .. (2d> 77, 143 AL.R. 428; Hillsbovough County v. Bregenzer, 151 Fla. 747, 10 So.,(2d) 498; Paty v. Landefeld, 150 Fla. 404, So. (2d) 466; Wolfson v. Heins, 149 Fla. 499, So. <2d) 858; United States v. Lee, 153 Fla. 94, 13 So. (2d) 919; Riesen v. Maryland Cas. Co., 153\ Fla. 205, 14 So. (2d) 197; Tampa Elec. Co. v. Copper, 153 Fla. 81, 14 So. (2d) 388; Clark v. Clarki 155 Fl!).. 574, 20 So. (2d) 900; Eristavitchitcherilie v. Miami Beach Federal Sav., etc., A&s'n, 154\ Fla. 100, 16 So. (2d) 730; Sa,unders v. Jackoo~ville, 157 Fla. 240, 25 So. (2d) '648; Grizzard v. JC.ees­bilrg, 157 Fla. 192, 25 So. (2d) 379; McCrory S~ores Oorp. v. Lee, 157 F'lilll. 2'74, 25 So. (2d) 567; )!al­lace v. Luxmoore, 156 Fla. 72&, 24 So. (2dJ) \302; Eisenburg v. Oorn.bium, 156 Fla. 702, 24 So. (2d) 236; Eisenberg v. Cornlblum, 1518 F1a. 177, 2E. (2d) 256; Deauvil:le Corp. v. Blount, 157 Fla. 753, 26So. (2d) 884; ·HowardJCole&Oo.v. Will' , 157 Fliru. 851, 27 So. (2d) 3·52; Florida Ban!k, letc., Co. v. Field, 157 Fla. ·261, 25 So. (2dJ) 663; '11I)a.vis v. Ashton, 156 Fla. 529, 23 :So. (2d) 725; Ha:pl; v. Ka,pnias, 157 Fla. 846, 27 So. (2d) 145; Ha~l v. Duvall, 156 Fila. 542, 24 So. (2dJ) 100; Crainle v. Nuta, 157 Fla. 613, 26 So. (2d) 670; EisenbUif!r v. Oornblum, 157 Flta. 372, 26 So. (2d) 49; O'Ne~ v. O'Neill, 157 Fla. 513, 26 So. (2d) 337; Gree~ v. Smith, 157 Fla. 454, 26 so. (2di) 181; Jacksonville v. Wilson, 157 Fla. 838, 27 So. (2d) 108; ~1"81 Gabl~ v. O:randOill, 157 Fla. 71,, 25 So. , <2dL1; Edlmun Realty Corporation v. Kea;rns, 158 1''!8. 558, 28 So. (2d) 834; Bumett v. Burnetlt, 158 f!a. 464, Z8 So. (2d) 878; Chlamiey v. Brown, 158 ;FJa. 489, 29 So. (2d) 209; Davis v. Strople, 158 fla. 614, 29 So. (2dl) 364; Cohen v. Cohen, 1518 Fla. 802, 30 So. (2d) 307; Po!Mer v. Pri(lg'ell, 158 fla. 889, 30 So. (2dJ) 494; Dam.s v. Oallio, 158 Fla. ~oo. 30 So. (2d) 915; GJ.ookma41 v. City of MiF! Beach; <Fla.>, 31 So: (21d) 393; Williams v. HOw-8ird Oole & Oo., (Fla;), 31 So. (2d!) 914; Koret~ky v. Singer, (-Fla.) , 32 So. (2d) ·5; Nicol v. Bressfer, (Fla.>, 32 So. (2d) 457. \.

Cited in Patten v. Daoud, 152 Fla. 448, 12 ~o.

~~iri!~9 c~~~.~Pi~~ ~~~~~3~~i ~o~~~~~a 7~~ Kilgore v. Bird, 149 Fla. 570, 6 So. (2d> 5~1; Dustin v. Latzko, 155 Fla. 824, 21 So. (2d) 904; Lee v. Dowda, 155 Fla. 68, 19_ ·so. (2d) 510; Cooper v. Tampa Elec.-Co., 154 Fla. 410, 17 f:;o. (2d) 785; Webber v. Webber, 156 FLa. 396, 23 So. (2d) 388; Estep v. starte, 1M Fla. 433, 23 So. (2d) 482; .Moohlow v. VooeHe, 156 Fla. 115, 22 So. (2d) 631;, Luc~n v. Southern Ohio Sav. Bank, etc., Oo., 156 Fla. 370, 23 So. (2dJ) 674.

Rule 35.

ANNOTATION. This rule was promulgated pursuant to

§ 25.03 (5) and supersedes § 67.04, in so far as it

[ 351]

" 1947 CUMULAT·IVE SUPPLEMENT TO VOLUME ll, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1941

retruires applications for supersedeas to be made to the supreme court. Seaboard Rendering Co. v. Conlon, 151 Fla. 617, 10 So. (2d) 136.

· It applies alike to appeals from injunctive \nd all other decrees. It is the duty of the cir­cuit courts to hear such applications but their orders in 'l he premise·s are reviewable as . pro-

., vided by paragraph (e). Sea~ard Rendering Co. v. Conlon, 151 Fla. 617, 10 So. (2d) 136.

Rule 36.

ANNOTATION. Writs of error in habeas corpus proceedings.­

This rule must be considered with Rule 2, and was not' infended to abolish writs of error in habeas corpus proceedings. State v. Quigg, 154 Fla. 348, 17 So. (2d) 697.

Sufficiency of evidence.-Under paragraph (b) of this rule, an appeal in which no briefs were filed, and which presented grounds which pre­sented only a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction of manslaughter obtained under an information charging mur­der in the second degree, was properly. denied. Lamaneda v. State, 153 Fla. 835, 16 So. (2d) 56.

Rule 37.

ANNOTATION. An, appeaa is t1he proper method to review the

judgment m collltempt proceedings. Pimnekamp v. Cireuit Court, etc., 15[1 Fla. 589, 21 So. (2d) 41.

Rule 38.

ANNOTATION. The purpose of this rule was to eJ;Iable the

circuit court to apply to the supreme court for instrtJ.ction as to questions of law that arise in the litigation of causes before it. Questions of fact will not be certified under the rule but distinct questions of law only will be considered and they must be without controlling precedent, must arise out of the main litigation and must facilitate its. disposition. Schwob Co. v. Florida Industrial Comm., 152 Fla. 203, 11 So. (2d) 782, 783. See also, Keener v. Keener, 152 Fla. 13, 11 So. (2d) 180.

''Statement of facts" is essential.-It is en­tirely proper, and indeed required by this rule, that the certificate shall also contain the style of the case, !J,nd a "statement of facts" show­ing the nature of the cause and the ciJCUm­stances ,out of which the questions of law arise. Florida Nat. Bank v. Gardner, 152 Fla. 636, 12 So. <2d) 574. ·

Instances of question properly certified.-See Richards v. Byrnes, 153 Fla. 705, 15 So. (2d) 610.

As a general rule, only single, definite and distinct questions or propositions of law can be certified under this rule. Florida Nat. Bank v. Gardner, 152 Fla. 636, 12 So. (2d) 574.

In an action for divorce predicated on the ground recited in paragraph eight, § 65.04, it was held that under this rule, the chancellor

properly certified the question, viz.: "May the plaintiff in this case be granted a divorce from the defendant on the ·ground that he <defen­dant) had secured a divorce from the com­plainant in another state?" to the supreme court, but that questions propounded with ref­erence to support for minor children are not within the scope of the rule. Keener v. Keener, 152 Fla. 13, 11 So. (2d) 180, 181, citing Schwob Co. V. Florida Industrial Comm., 152 Fla. 203, 11 So. <2d) 782.

Instances of questions not properly certified. -Where questions certified are not within the scope of this rule, the certificate must be denied. Lanier v. Florida Louisiana Red Cypress Co., 152 Fla. 428, 12 So. (2d) 117.

Where question of res adjudicata was not determined, though the circuit court may have inferred that such issue could not be presented by demurrer, a circuit court judgment merely reversing the judgment of a lower court was not reviewable, and certiorari was properly denied. Davis v. First Nat. Bank, 153 Fla. 864, 16 So. (2d) 46.

Where there are precedents applicable to pending controversy then the questions thereon are not such as are contemplated or controlled by this rule, and accordingly the certificate to supreme court will be denied. Bigby v. Lykes Bros., 153 Fla. 313, 14 l;)o. (2d) 565.

Where certificate gave a condensed summary of the allegations of a bill in equity followed by the following certified questions: "Does this court of equity, under the facts alleged~ have jurisdiction, or is it authorized to grant the relief prayed?", it was held that such question was not within the contemplation of this rule. Florida Nat. Bank v. Gardner, 152 Fla. 636, 12 So. <2d) 574.

A petition filed in the circuit court praying for a review and reversal with instructions of an exhibit "marked Exhibit No. 1" and prayed it denied petitioner's application for re-determi­nation of its rate of contribution under the Unemployment Compensation Act · was held not' to be such· a question as is contemplated by this rule. Schwob Co. v. Florida Industrial Comm., 152 Fla. 203, 11 So. (2d) 782, 783. See also, Keener v. Keener, 152 Fla. 13, 11 So. (2d) 180.

This rule may be employed to transfer cases in which the supreme court and the circuit court have coordinate jurisdiction. Schwob Co. v. Florida Industrial Comm, 152 ' Fla. 203, 11 So. (2d) 782,' 783. See also,, Keener v. Keener, 152 Fla. 13, 11 So. (2d) 180.

Questions that may be certified to the su­preme court under this rule are those ancillary to the , main issue that sometimes bring a half dozen or more appe_als to the supreme court before the merits of the case are reached and disposed of. Schwob Co. v. Florida Industrial Comm., 152 Fla. 203, 11 So. <2d) 782, 783. See also, Keener v. Keener, 152 Fla. 13, 11 So. (2d) 180.

[ 352]

1947 CUMULATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO VOLUME II, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1941

Applied in State v. Hilliard, 152 Fla. 294, 11 So. (2d) 487; Gipson v. Gipson, 151 Fla. 587, 10 So. (2d) 82; State v. Taylor, 151 Fla. 296, 9 So. <2d) 708; Rudisill v. Tampa, 151 Fla. 284, 9 So. (2d) 380; Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co. v. Walker, 151 Fla. 314, 9 So. (2d) 361; Cerny v. Cerny, 152 Fla. 333, 11 So. (2d) 777; Bow-d of Public In-

struction v. Briltt, 157 Fla. 676, 26 So. (2d) 902; In re Brock, 157 Fla. 291, 25 So. (2dJ) 659; Jette v. Harbi.&m, 158' Fla. 418, 28 So. (2d) 858; Bell v. Bell, 158 Fla. 662, 29 So. (2d) 7·57; Rose v. Frederick, (Fla.), 31 So. (2d) 401.

Cited in Cantwell v. St. Petersburg Port Au­thority, 155 Fla. 651, 21 So. (2d) 139.

COMMON LAW-COURT RULES.

Rule 16.

A~OTATION.

Editor's note.-The petition of the Florida State Bar Association; for the substitution of the Federal ·Rules of Civil Procedure for the Florida system of common law and equity procedure was denied in Petition of Florida State Bar Ass'n, 155 Fla. 710, 21 So. (2d) 605 . Terrell, J., was ap­pointed by the Chief Justice • to prepare such amendments and additions to the rules as might appear to him to expedite and simplify the administration of justice. His proposals are set out as addenda to the opinion, 21 So. (2d) 610.

Bill of particulars.

Where appellant appended to his declaration an exhibit "marked Exhibit No. 1 and prayed to be taken as a part hereof," which exhibit showed one item of damages stated to have been sustained by plaintiff because of the sale of certain property by defendant to the then additional defendant while the plantiff held an exclusive written option on said tract of prop­erty, it was held that under this rule although the pleader did not attach the option to the declaration the trial court was justified in con­sidering the bill of particulars a part of the declaration. Hunter v. Tyner, 151 Fla. 707, 10 So. (2d) 492, 493.

Prior to the adoption of this rule a bill of par­ticula;rs was not a part of the declaration liDless specificaJlly made so by a;pt wordls iJn the declara­tion. Roberts v. Seabol!l.lrd Surety Co., 158 Fla. 686, 29 So. (2d) 743.

A bill of particulars is by this rule made a part of the declarntion.--See i8llso Roberts v. Sea;bow-d Sur.ety Co., 1518 F'11a. 686, 29 So. (2d) 743.

Ailldl when a bil'l of par:ticuta.rs is attached to 13lild made a part of the declaration, then the !plaintiff is bound by it and in proof cannot go beyond it. ld.

Rule 17.

ANNOTATION. Applied in Red Top CaJb & Baggage Co. v. Dor­

ner, (Fla.), 32 So. (2d) 3211.

Rule 22.

ANNOTATION. In an action against executors for goods sold

and delivered, money due, and work done, it

was held that a plea that decedent never was indebted as alleged was a sham plea and sub­ject to motion to strike. Harris v. Smith, 150 Fla. 125, 7 So. (2d) . 343, 344.

Rule 27.

ANNOTATION. Cited in Ross v. Calamia, 153 Fla. 151, 13 So,

So. (2d) 916.

Rule 32.

ANNOTATION. Inducement in plead·ing is the st:a.tement of

matte:r wlhlich is introouctory to the principal subject of the decla:ration or plea and which is necessary tJo ex.pl.l3lin or elucidate · it. Red! Top Oab & Baggage Co. v. booner, (Fla.), 32 So. (2d) 321.

Applied in Florida Motor Lines v. Millian, 157 Fla. 21, 24 So. (2d) 710; Atlantic Co'. v. Oren­dorff, 156 Fla. 1, 22 So. (2d) 260.

Rule 58.

ANNOTATION. Applied, in Ford v. Ford, 150 Fla. 717, 8 So.

(2d) 495, wherein facts were such that strict application of rule that required application for continuance to be by written motion, was considered harsh and oppressive.

Rule 74.

ANNOTATION. Cited in Hollywood v. Clark, 153 Fla. 501, 15

So. <2d) 175.

Rule 85.

ANNOTATION. Purpose.-This ruie is for the purpose of hav­

ing the parity oot out fully and dear:ly the facts upon whioh he relies for his claim of title and !hie is bound by the allegations of his bill of par­ticulars as to facts upon which he relies to sustain his claim. Drawdy Inv. Co. v. Leonw-d, 158 Fla. 444, 29 So. (2d!) 198.

Alnd he may not 'a;t the trial r ,ely on facts not stated in t he bHl of part,iculars oo strengthen his -claim of title. Id.

Applied in Platt Cattle Co. v . Stott, 157 Fla. 286, 25 So. (2d) 655.

[ 353]

194'7 C~TIVE SUPPLEMENT TO ·voLUME ll, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1941

Rule 86.

ANNoTATION. · Cited in Pace v. State, 150 Fla. 198, 7 So. (2d)

595.

Rule 8'7.

ANN01'ATION. A petitio1_1er upon motion for peremptory writ

of mandamus notwithstanding the answer can obtain a part only of the relief sought where it is entirely practicable and sensible to dispose of the litigation in one suit rather than dis­charge the writ and require the petitioner to institute another action to secure relief which could be easily granted without the additional expense and delay. Pace v. State, 150 Fla. 198, 'l So. (2d) 595, 599.

CODE OF ETHICS

ANNOTATION.

Rule B.

Section. I.

1'7.

Cited in Sullivan v. Given, 155 Fla. 445, 20 So. (2d) 493.

18.

ANNOTATION. Cited in Sullivan v. Given, 155 Fla. 445, 20 So.

(2d) 493.

ANNOTATION.

Section n. 5.

The purpose of seotion (II) paragraph (5) is to prohibit the indulgence by attorneys in the practice of using offensive language and indulg­ing in uncomplimentary personality when re­ferring to opposing counsel. Davis v. State, 156 Fla. 181, 23 So. (2d) 85.

Applied, p!lll'l8gl'8.ph (5), section <II>, in Davis v. State, 156 Fla. 178, 23 So. (2<1) 87.

Rule C.

ANNOTATION. Cited in State v. Kehoe, 158 Fla. 40, 27 So. (2d)

517.

3.

ANNOTATION. SUspension of ll!ltto:rnJey's riglht to practice for

two years because of Wl!Professional conduct held s;utho.rizedi by evidence. ln. re Rubin, 150 Fila. 783, 9 So. (2d) 190.

8.

ANNOTATION. Where an ,attorney is suspended from praotice

for a certain period illlllKL until he should have repaidi funds misappropriated from his clieillt, ,restitutionl in full need not Ilie'OOSSM"ilY precede reinstatement as · "!l"estiltution" in such OlllSe

meams pa.ymerut to the extent of one'& ability to pay, honestly and fairly made. Petition of Stalnaker, 150 Fla. 853, 9 So. (2d) 100.

r

[ 354]

SUPPLEMENTAL POPULATION TABLE "B" POPULATION OF FLORIDA BY COUNTIES,

1945 STATE CENSUS

Alachua __ ________________ _ : ________________________________________ 38,245

Baker ----------------------------- -- -------------------- --- --- --- ---- 6,326 Bay --- --------------------- -- ------------------------------------------ 43,188 Bradford ___ ... -- --- -------------------------- ---- ------ --- -------- 10,730 Brevard -----·------ --- --------------- ---- --------------------- ----- 19,339 Broward ----·-·------------ -- ------------------------------- -------- 50,442 Calhoun -- ----------- ------ -------- ---- --- -------------------------- 8,225 Charlotte ------·---------- ------- ------ ---- ----- -------- -- --------- 4,220 Citrus -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- ------- 5,427 Clay ---------------------------·--------------------------- ----------- 10,038 Collier ----------- -- --- -------- ---- --- ------------- ------------------ 4,957 Columbia --- --·----------- -- ---- ---------- ------- ------------------ 17,139 Dade ----- --------- ---- --- --- ------------------------------------------315,138 DeSoto ------·-·-- --- --- ----- --- ------------------------------------- 6,854 Dixie ----- ------·------------------------------------------ ------------ 4,926 Duval ----------- -------- --- --------- ---------------------------------273,843 Escambia ---·- -- ------- ----------- --- ------------------------------105,262 Fliagler ---- --·- ·· ------- --- ------------------- -- ------- ---- ---------- 2,652 Franklin -- -- -- -- -· --------------------- --- --- ---- -------------- --- 8,026 Gadsden ---·----- ------------ -- -- ------- -------------------------- 30,992 Gilchrist --------------------------- -- -------- --------- --- --------- 3,466 Glades ----- ------------------------ --------- -------------------------- 2,281 Gulf --- --------------------------------------------------------------- 7,010 Hamilton -- -------------------------------------------------------- 8,731 Hardee ------------------- -- ------ --------- --- ----------------------- 8,585 Hendry ------- ----- ------ --------------------- ----------- ------------ 5,066 Hernando ----------------------- --------------------------------- 5,672 Hig.b:Lamds -------- ---------------------------------------- -------- 16,224 Hillsborough ---------------------------------- ---------- --- -----207,844 Holmes ----------- --- --------- ---- --------- ------------------- -- ----- 14,627 Indian River ------------- -- ------------------------------------- 9,079 Jackson ---- --- --- ----------------------------- '--------------- ----- 34,509 Jefferson -------·-------------------·------------------------------ 11,066 Lafayette ------------- ---------------------------- ---- ---------- --- 3,995 Lake ----------·--· ---------------------------------- --- ---- --------- -- 27,946 Lee --- -- -------------- ---- ------------ -- ------------------------------- 23,593 Leon ---·-------------------------------------------------------------- 35,451 Levy ----------- ---- --- --- -- ----------------------- ----------------- --- 9,902 Liberty ----- --- ------------- ----- ------------------------------------ 3,193 Madison ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 15,537 Mana;tee ------------- ---- -- ---- -- -- ---- ---- -- --------------- ---- -- 26,803 Marion -- ----------- ------------------------- ------------------------ 35,132 Martin -----·----------·--------------------------------------------- 6,094 Monroe ---·--------- -------- ----------------------------- ---------- 19,018-Nassau ----··· --·-------------------- -------------------------------- 10,859 Okaloosa --------- ---- --------- ------------ ------------------------ 16,155 Okeechobee --------------- ------ -------------------- ------------- 2,919 Orange -- ------ --------- --------- ------ -- -- --------- ------------- ---- 86,782 Osceola ---- ----------- --- --- ------ -- ---------- -- ----------------- -- 10,562 Palm Beach ------ -------------------- --------------------------112,311 Pasco ------------ ------------ ---------------------------------------- 13,729 Pinellas ----------------------------------------------------- -------130,268 Polk -------·--·---------- ---- ------- -------------- --------------------112,429 Putnam ------------------------------------------------------------ 17,837 St. Johns ---·----------------------------------------------- ------- 21,596 St. Lucie ·-- ------- -------- ----------- ----- --------------------- --- 12,958 Santa Rooa ----------- ---------- -- -- --------- -- ----------- --- ---- 16,9'816 Sarasota -- ---- ·· -- ---- ----- --- ------------------------------------ 19,202 Seminole -------------- -------------------------------------------- 24,560 Sumter ----------- ·------------------------------------------------ 10,417 Suwannee -··-- --- --------------- --------------------------------- 17,602 Taylor --------· -· ---- --- ------------------------ ------------------- --- 10,738 Union -------------·---------- ---------------------------------------- 6,051 Volusia -------·-------------- -------- ----------------------- --------- 58,492 Wakulla --------------------- -- ---- --------------------- ------------ 5,059 WaJton ----------------- -- --------·-------------- ------------- ----- 13,871 Washington ------------- -----------·---------- -------- --------- 11,889

SUPPLEMENTAL POPULATION TABLE "C" NUMERICAL ORDER OF COUNTIES

ACCORDING TO POPULATION 1945 STATE CENSUS

2,281._ ___ _______________________ ____________________ __ ________ __ __ Glades _ 2,652'---- -- -·-------- ---- --------- -- ---- -- --------·---------- ·- -- -- Flagler ·· 2,919-----·----------- -------------·--------------------·-- Okeechobee 3,193------------------------------------------------------- ------- Liberty 3,466·-·-------·------------------------------·---'-------- ---- Gilchrist 3,995 .... ----------------------------------------------------- -- Lafayette 4,220'------------------- --------- ----- --------------- ------- Charlotte 4,926·-------------------------------------------------- -- ------------- Dixie 4,957·-- --- ------------ --- ------------ --- ------------ ----- ----------- Collier 5,059 ........ ------------------------- --------------------------- Wakulla 5,066________________________________________________ __ ____________ Hendry 5,427------------- -------- ---------------------------- --------------- Citrus 5,672·---·----- --------- --- ---------------------------------- Hernando 6,051_ ____________ _______________________________________ ______ ___ ___ Union 6,094 _____ ______ ___ __________ ,,.................................... Ma.rtin 6,326 ....... .. ______ ____ _________ ____ _________________ ____ ______ _____ Baker

6,854 __________ ____ ·--··-·----·-·····------------- ·---···----·--· DeSoto 7 ,010 _________________________ __ __________ __ _ ·-·---·--- --- ---- -- ·· -- --- Gulf 8,02·6'-·--·---- ---- ------ ------·-----·-·--------·------·-------- Framklin 8,225------- -- ·-------------------·------------------ --- --------- Calhoun 8,585---- ---·-·---------·-· ---· --·---·- ------ -----------·-·-------- Hardee 8,731·--·----··-------·---·--------·-·------------------- ------ Hamilton 9,079·---------- ------------ -- ---- ------· ---------------- Indian River 9,9mL·---------- ------·-· --- --- ---···-----·---·----- -- -----·- -------- Levy

10,038----·------------------·---------- ---------- ·---- -- ---- ----------- Clay 10,417.--------·-----· ---·-·---·-- -------------------------·····-- Sumter 10,562'.. ..... --- ---------- -- ----------·------·----------- ---· --· -- Osceola 10,730-------------- ---- --- -----· ---- ---·----------------------- Bradford 10,738 .. ____________ __ ____ _ ·----- ----·----·--·-·-----·-·------------ Taylor 10,859 ____ ________ __ _______ _____________ ___ ____ _ ,................... Na&Sa.U 11,066 ..... ____________ ___________ ____ __ __ __ _______ ____ _________ Jefferson

11,889------------------------- ---- ---- ------------·----- --- Washington 12,958---- -- ·---- -- ------ --------------·-----··------------ ----- St. Lucie 13, 729------------- --------·--- --- ·---- -- ·------- --------------------- Pasco 13,871·---- -------- --------------------- -· -- ------------------------ Walton 14,627 --- ----· ----------------------------------·------------------- Holmes 15,537·----- ·-------------- ----------------------·---------------- Madison 16,155·-----·--·-----------------------------·------------------ Okaloosa 16,224 .... ------ ---------- -----·----------- ------- ----- ·------ Higlhla4:ldS 16,986------------------- ---- ------------- --- ------ -----· --- Sa.nlta. R.osa 17 ,139·--------------------------------------------------------- Columbia 17 ,602 ____________ _.__ __________ __ ___ ____ ______ _________ _______ Suwannee

17 ,837·----------------- ------------------- ---- ------------------- Putnam 19,018_____ __________ __ ____________ ____ ___________________________ Monroe 19,202--- -·-· --·-----·--------·-------------·-- -------- --------·-- Sarasota 19,339·--·------------------------------- ------------------------ - Brevard 21,596----- -· -· -···----------------- ----------------------- ----- St. Johns 23,593----------------------·------ ----·--- -- --- ------ --- ----------------- Lee 24,560____ ______________ ______ _____________ __ _____ ____ __ ________ Seminole 26,803---------------------------· ---------·-------------------- Ma'D.a,tee 27,946---------·-------------------------------------------------------- Lake 30,992------··----------- ---------- ---- --------------------------- Gadsden 34,509----- ----- ------- --- ------------------- -- -· ----------------- Jackson 35,132----- --· ------ ---------··-·-------·---- --· ---- -----------· ---- Marion 35,451-----·--·-·------------ --------------·---------------------------- Leon 38,245 .... ------------------··----- -·------ -------------------- --- Alachua 43,188---·-·----- -- ------------------------------------------··--·-------- Bay 50,442--------·--------------------·------- -- ------ --- ------ ---·-- Broward 58,492-------··---- -- --·-·--------- -------- -- ---- ---- -- -·--- -------- Volusia 86,782___________ ___ __________ ____ ______ ___ __ ____________________ ___ Orange

105,262-----·- -------- --- ·------·----------------- ·-·------·----- Escambia 112,311.._______ ____________ __ _____________ ________ __ ______ Palm Beach

112,429------·--·---------·--------- -·--·-------·--- ---·------------------- Polk 130,268 ....... ·-- --- ----·--------------- ----·-··-------- --------- -- Pinellas 207 ,844---·· -·-- ·----- -·--------------·------------- ------- Hillsborough 273,843----· ---------------- -·--- -----· ----·------ --------------------- Duval 315,138--·--- -- ·-···---- -------------------·----- ---- -------------------- Dade

.. ' .

. i

... ·#

I

'I

.

• \ '

"';

' , . .

f

t

~ , FLORIDA

GROWER

p R E S S

TAMPA

• ..