19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

20
19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

Transcript of 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

Page 1: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

19.11.2009

Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

Page 2: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 2Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Design Goals

• Lowest possible material budget

• Gravitational sag equal or lower than 100µm

• Minimum coefficient of thermal expansion

• Low moisture susceptibility

• Radiation hardness up to 10 Mrad

• Compliant with the Origami concept

Page 3: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 3Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Origami Module Readout Side

• High component density

• Sensitive wirebonds

• Flexible structure

• Thermal expansion

• Bad attributes for mounting the structure on top side

Page 4: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 4Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Origami Rohacell Core

• Rohacell core is an already existing volume

• Electrical and thermal separation from sensor

• Evenly distributed material

• Small modifications of the core can lead to good structural strength

Page 5: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 5Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Origami Module Sensor Side

• Rigid contact surface

• Conventional rib design is possible

• Wire bonds and fanouts limit the contact area

Page 6: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 6Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Two Design Options

Option 1: Sandwich Option 2: Ribs

Page 7: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 7Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Option 1- Sandwich Design

• Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) layers cover Rohacell core

• Separating Sensor from CFRP using a thin isolating film (eg. Sil-Pad strips)

• Origami hybrid sits on top of Sandwich (not drawn in this sketch)Sensor

CFRP Sandwich

Page 8: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 8Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Option 1 – Simulation Boundary Conditions

• Rohacell: 2 mm thickness

• CFRP: 2 x 0.14 mm plies

• 40 mm wide, 2.28 mm thick, 698 mm long

• Sensor weight: 23.90 g

• Structure weight: 15 g

• Fixed support at both ends

• Average radiation length: 0.629% X0

Page 9: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 9Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Option 1 - Simulation

• Max. sag: 0.084 mm

• Avg. sag: 0.05 mm

Page 10: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 10Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Option 2 – Rib Design

• Sandwich composite ribs

• CFRP ribs support horizontally arranged sensors

• Sandwich rib structure supports vertically arranged sensors

Page 11: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 11Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Option 2 – Mounting Points

• Elevated Rohacell mounting points

• Serve as contact area and isolation for the sensors

Page 12: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 12Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Option 2 – Simulation Boundary Conditions

• Rohacell: 1.2 mm thickness

• CFRP: 2 x 0.14 mm plies per rib

• 6.5 mm high, 1.48 mm wide, 698 mm long

• Structure weight: 4.8 g (both ribs)

• Fixed support at both ends

• Average radiation length: 0.579 % X0

Page 13: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 13Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Option 2 – Simulation

• Horizontal Sensors• Max sag: 0.084 mm• Avg sag: 0.05 mm

Page 14: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 14Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Option 2 – Simulation

• Vertical Sensors• Max sag: 0.087 mm• Avg sag: 0.067 mm

Page 15: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009

Radiation Length Option 1

15Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Profile [mm]

Radi

atio

nLe

ngth

[%]

Sandwich Design

CFRP

Pipe APV Kapton

RohacellSensor

Coolant

“Batman” distribution of pipe and coolant

Page 16: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009

Radiation Length Option 2

16Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Kapton

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Profile [mm]

Radi

atio

nLe

ngth

[%]

Rib Design

CFRP Rohacell

Pipe APVCoolant

Sensor

Page 17: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009

Pros & Cons of Option 1 (Sandwich Design)

+ Even distribution of material budget

– High fabrication effort & cost

– Connector issues with bent kapton

– Additional capacitance decreases signal to noise by ~ 2.5%

– Bonding potentially more complicated

17Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Page 18: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009

Pros & Cons of Option 2 (Rib Design)

+ Significantly easier to build

+ High assembly precision

+ Gravitational sag constant in φ

– Particles could hit the structure before they hit the sensor (although unlikely)

– Uneven material distribution

18Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Page 19: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

19.11.2009 19Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)

Discussion

• Homogeneous design vs. lower average radiation length

• Construction effort of sandwich vs. rib design

• Higher costs of sandwich design

• Problem of twist resulting from slanted sensors

Page 20: 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.

The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade

Outlook

• Construction of mechanical mockup

• Thermal simulation / measurements

• Integration of cooling

• Construction of outermost ladder

• Endring design

20Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)19.11.2009