Silicon Detector Readout 14 June 2012 Markus Friedl (HEPHY) IPM-HEPHY Detector School.
19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.
-
Upload
cordelia-oconnor -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of 19.11.2009 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade.
19.11.2009
Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 2Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Design Goals
• Lowest possible material budget
• Gravitational sag equal or lower than 100µm
• Minimum coefficient of thermal expansion
• Low moisture susceptibility
• Radiation hardness up to 10 Mrad
• Compliant with the Origami concept
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 3Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Origami Module Readout Side
• High component density
• Sensitive wirebonds
• Flexible structure
• Thermal expansion
• Bad attributes for mounting the structure on top side
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 4Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Origami Rohacell Core
• Rohacell core is an already existing volume
• Electrical and thermal separation from sensor
• Evenly distributed material
• Small modifications of the core can lead to good structural strength
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 5Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Origami Module Sensor Side
• Rigid contact surface
• Conventional rib design is possible
• Wire bonds and fanouts limit the contact area
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 6Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Two Design Options
Option 1: Sandwich Option 2: Ribs
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 7Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Option 1- Sandwich Design
• Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) layers cover Rohacell core
• Separating Sensor from CFRP using a thin isolating film (eg. Sil-Pad strips)
• Origami hybrid sits on top of Sandwich (not drawn in this sketch)Sensor
CFRP Sandwich
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 8Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Option 1 – Simulation Boundary Conditions
• Rohacell: 2 mm thickness
• CFRP: 2 x 0.14 mm plies
• 40 mm wide, 2.28 mm thick, 698 mm long
• Sensor weight: 23.90 g
• Structure weight: 15 g
• Fixed support at both ends
• Average radiation length: 0.629% X0
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 9Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Option 1 - Simulation
• Max. sag: 0.084 mm
• Avg. sag: 0.05 mm
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 10Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Option 2 – Rib Design
• Sandwich composite ribs
• CFRP ribs support horizontally arranged sensors
• Sandwich rib structure supports vertically arranged sensors
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 11Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Option 2 – Mounting Points
• Elevated Rohacell mounting points
• Serve as contact area and isolation for the sensors
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 12Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Option 2 – Simulation Boundary Conditions
• Rohacell: 1.2 mm thickness
• CFRP: 2 x 0.14 mm plies per rib
• 6.5 mm high, 1.48 mm wide, 698 mm long
• Structure weight: 4.8 g (both ribs)
• Fixed support at both ends
• Average radiation length: 0.579 % X0
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 13Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Option 2 – Simulation
• Horizontal Sensors• Max sag: 0.084 mm• Avg sag: 0.05 mm
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 14Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Option 2 – Simulation
• Vertical Sensors• Max sag: 0.087 mm• Avg sag: 0.067 mm
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009
Radiation Length Option 1
15Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Profile [mm]
Radi
atio
nLe
ngth
[%]
Sandwich Design
CFRP
Pipe APV Kapton
RohacellSensor
Coolant
“Batman” distribution of pipe and coolant
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009
Radiation Length Option 2
16Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Kapton
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Profile [mm]
Radi
atio
nLe
ngth
[%]
Rib Design
CFRP Rohacell
Pipe APVCoolant
Sensor
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009
Pros & Cons of Option 1 (Sandwich Design)
+ Even distribution of material budget
– High fabrication effort & cost
– Connector issues with bent kapton
– Additional capacitance decreases signal to noise by ~ 2.5%
– Bonding potentially more complicated
17Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009
Pros & Cons of Option 2 (Rib Design)
+ Significantly easier to build
+ High assembly precision
+ Gravitational sag constant in φ
– Particles could hit the structure before they hit the sensor (although unlikely)
– Uneven material distribution
18Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
19.11.2009 19Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)
Discussion
• Homogeneous design vs. lower average radiation length
• Construction effort of sandwich vs. rib design
• Higher costs of sandwich design
• Problem of twist resulting from slanted sensors
The Mechanical Structure for the SVD Upgrade
Outlook
• Construction of mechanical mockup
• Thermal simulation / measurements
• Integration of cooling
• Construction of outermost ladder
• Endring design
20Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna)19.11.2009