16042 Medley et al Supplmentary Information · 2015-12-02 · Microsoft Word - 16042 Medley et al...

4
1 Visceral leishmaniasis control: healthseeking, diagnostics and transmission Graham F Medley 1 , T Déirdre Hollingsworth 2 , Piero L Olliaro 3,4 , Emily R Adams 2,5* Supplementary information 1. Healthcare seeking and diagnostic model The healthcare seeking model describes the pathways from onset of nonspecific symptoms to diagnosis. The full model and parameters are described by the flow diagram below (Figure 1) and the following equations. Fever, nonhealthseeking: !! ! !" = ! ! Fever, healthseeking: !! ! !" = ! ! KalaAzar, nonhealthseeking: !! ! !" = ! ! KalaAzar, healthseeking: !! ! !" = ! + ! ! The model describes the behaviour from the point of onset of nonspecific fever, symptoms, and nonhealth seeking behaviour. From this point individuals can either seek health care or progress to KA. If they seek health care, they cannot be diagnosed until they progress to KA. If they progress to KA prior to seeking health care, they can only be diagnosed after seeking health care. The parameters in the model were estimated by fitting to the data in Figure 1a, which are the mean times to healthseeking and to diagnosis in patients who were subsequently diagnosed with KA. The progression from fever to KA, which occurs with rate a, is assumed to be a biological ‘constant’ across settings, whereas the other parameters were setting specific. We assume that c≥b, i.e. individuals with full KA are more likely to seek healthcare than those with nonspecific symptoms. There were no priors available for the parameters, even the progression from fever to full KA, and the individual data was not available. We therefore created a grid of all possible integer values for durations in each class (the reciprocal of the rate), and thus generated locationspecific combinations of parameters which produced results which were consistent with the data. On the basis of results we additionally presume that 1/c > 5d, i.e. that on average the time spent health seeking is less than 5 days if they have full KA, and that 33d < 1/a < 55d, i.e. that the average period of nonsymptomatic illness, before KA, lies between these limits. Note that this period has to be at least 14d based on the diagnostic criteria for KA. Using these criteria, there are 526 unique parameter combinations (a, b, c, d) for Bihar, and 2320 and 312 for Nepal and Bangladesh respectively based on integer day periods which are shown in Figure 2. In Bihar, the minimum and maximum proportions of individuals seeking healthcare before progressing to full KA (going to F h before K n ) are 76% and 87%; the min and max are 24%49% and 88%93% for Nepal and Bangladesh respectively. 2. Transmission dynamic model

Transcript of 16042 Medley et al Supplmentary Information · 2015-12-02 · Microsoft Word - 16042 Medley et al...

Page 1: 16042 Medley et al Supplmentary Information · 2015-12-02 · Microsoft Word - 16042 Medley et al Supplmentary Information .docx Created Date: 11/30/2015 1:15:50 PM ...

1  

Visceral  leishmaniasis  control:  health-­‐seeking,  diagnostics  and  transmission    

Graham  F  Medley1,  T  Déirdre  Hollingsworth2,  Piero  L  Olliaro3,4,  Emily  R  Adams2,5*  

Supplementary  information    

1. Health-­‐care  seeking  and  diagnostic  model    The  health-­‐care  seeking  model  describes  the  pathways  from  onset  of  non-­‐specific  symptoms  to  diagnosis.  The  full  model  and  parameters  are  described  by  the  flow  diagram  below  (Figure  1)  and  the  following  equations.    Fever,  non-­‐health-­‐seeking:   !!!

!"=  −𝑎𝐹! − 𝑏𝐹!  

Fever,  health-­‐seeking:     !!!!"

=  𝑏𝐹! − 𝑎𝐹!  

Kala-­‐Azar,  non-­‐health-­‐seeking:   !!!!"

=  𝑎𝐹! − 𝑐𝐾!  

Kala-­‐Azar,  health-­‐seeking:   !!!!"

=  𝑎𝐹! + 𝑐𝐾! − 𝑑𝐾!  

   The  model  describes  the  behaviour  from  the  point  of  onset  of  non-­‐specific  fever,  symptoms,  and  non-­‐health  seeking  behaviour.  From  this  point  individuals  can  either  seek  health  care  or  progress  to  KA.  If  they  seek  health  care,  they  cannot  be  diagnosed  until  they  progress  to  KA.  If  they  progress  to  KA  prior  to  seeking  health  care,  they  can  only  be  diagnosed  after  seeking  health  care.      The  parameters  in  the  model  were  estimated  by  fitting  to  the  data  in  Figure  1a,  which  are  the  mean  times  to  health-­‐seeking  and  to  diagnosis  in  patients  who  were  subsequently  diagnosed  with  KA.  The  progression  from  fever  to  KA,  which  occurs  with  rate  a,  is  assumed  to  be  a  biological  ‘constant’  across  settings,  whereas  the  other  parameters  were  setting  specific.  We  assume  that  c  ≥  b,  i.e.  individuals  with  full  KA  are  more  likely  to  seek  health-­‐care  than  those  with  non-­‐specific  symptoms.  There  were  no  priors  available  for  the  parameters,  even  the  progression  from  fever  to  full  KA,  and  the  individual  data  was  not  available.  We  therefore  created  a  grid  of  all  possible  integer  values  for  durations  in  each  class  (the  reciprocal  of  the  rate),  and  thus  generated  location-­‐specific  combinations  of  parameters  which  produced  results  which  were  consistent  with  the  data.  On  the  basis  of  results  we  additionally  presume  that  1/c  >  5d,  i.e.  that  on  average  the  time  spent  health-­‐seeking  is  less  than  5  days  if  they  have  full  KA,  and  that  33d  <  1/a  <  55d,  i.e.  that  the  average  period  of  non-­‐symptomatic  illness,  before  KA,  lies  between  these  limits.  Note  that  this  period  has  to  be  at  least  14d  based  on  the  diagnostic  criteria  for  KA.  Using  these  criteria,  there  are  526  unique  parameter  combinations  (a,  b,  c,  d)  for  Bihar,  and  2320  and  312  for  Nepal  and  Bangladesh  respectively  based  on  integer  day  periods  which  are  shown  in  Figure  2.    In  Bihar,  the  minimum  and  maximum  proportions  of  individuals  seeking  health-­‐care  before  progressing  to  full  KA  (going  to  Fh  before  Kn)  are  76%  and  87%;  the  min  and  max  are  24%-­‐49%  and  88%-­‐93%  for  Nepal  and  Bangladesh  respectively.    2.  Transmission  dynamic  model    

Page 2: 16042 Medley et al Supplmentary Information · 2015-12-02 · Microsoft Word - 16042 Medley et al Supplmentary Information .docx Created Date: 11/30/2015 1:15:50 PM ...

2  

The  transmission  dynamic  model  was  formulated  by  extending  the  health  behaviour  model  to  include  the  stages  prior  to  and  after  the  onset  of  symptoms,  and  by  including  the  feedback  from  infections  to  transmission.      Following  exposure  and  latent  infection,  approximately  1-­‐p=4%  of  individuals  will  progress  to  have  symptomatic  disease  11.  These  individuals  follow  the  healthcare  model  described  above.  On  diagnosis  individuals  are  treated  and  are  assumed  to  progress  to  a  dormant  state.  This  dormant  state  is  a  simplification  of  the  dynamics  of  treatment  success  and  failure  and  the  potential  development  of  PKDL,  each  of  which  are  currently  poorly  quantified  and  outside  the  scope  of  the  current  model.  The  duration  of  the  latent  stage  is  unknown,  and  we  have  selected  an  average  of  80  days  based  on  being  slightly  longer  than  the  duration  between  onset  of  symptoms  and  full  KA  and  that  for  most  infections  the  rate  of  progression  quickens  as  the  infection  progresses.  Anecdotally,  in  more  seasonal  environments  (but  with  different  Leishmania  species),  the  peak  incidence  in  cases  lags  the  peak  transmission  season  by  2  –  3  months.      The  relative  infectiousness  of  the  L  stage  is  also  unknown,  and  we  have  chosen  a  value  suggesting  that  they  are  1/1000  as  infectious  as  KA  patients.  We  expect  that  infectiousness  will  increase  as  disease  progresses,  but  there  is  no  data  for  humans.  We  have  chosen  the  relative  infectiousness  of  the  dormant  class  on  the  basis  of  the  dynamics  of  infection.  For  larger  values  of  βD  ,  the  dynamics  are  essentially  SI,  with  infection  resulting  in  a  carrier  state.  However,  VL  has  been  characterised  as  having  intrinsic  SIR  type  dynamics  22,  which  imposes  an  upper  limit  on  infectiousness  post-­‐KA.  Note  that  for  both  latent  and  dormant  classes  our  presumed  infectiousness  parameters  are  averages,  so  that  there  might  be  a  minority  of  PKDL  patients  (subsumed  into  our  class  D)  who  are  highly  infectious  and  a  majority  who  are  not  infectious.  Whilst  such  a  distribution  would  impact  on  the  dynamics  we  believe  it  is  relatively  unimportant  in  the  short-­‐term.      The  equations  which  describe  the  transmission  dynamic  model  are  as  follows.    Susceptible:       !"

!"= 𝜇𝑁 − 𝜆𝑆  

Latently  infected:     !"!"= 𝜆𝑆 − 𝜎 + 𝜇 𝐿  

Fever,  non-­‐health-­‐seeking:   !!!!"

= 1 − 𝑝 𝜎𝐿 − 𝑎 + 𝑏 + 𝜇 𝐹!  

Fever,  health-­‐seeking:     !!!!"

=  𝑏𝐹! − 𝑎 + 𝛼 + 𝜇 𝐹!  

Kala-­‐azar,  non-­‐health-­‐seeking:   !!!!"

=  𝑎𝐹! − 𝑐 + 𝜇 𝐾!  

Kala-­‐azar,  health-­‐seeking:   !!!!"

=  𝑎𝐹! + 𝑐𝐾! − 𝑑 + 𝜇 𝐾!  

Dormant:       !"!"= 𝑝𝜎𝐿 + 𝑑𝐾! + 𝛼𝐹! − 𝜇𝐷  

Force  of  infection:     𝜆 =  𝛽! 𝛽!𝐿 + 𝛽! 𝐹! + 𝐹!   + 𝐾! + 𝐾! + 𝛽!𝐷 /𝑁  

Total  population     𝑁 = 𝑆 + 𝐿 + 𝐹! + 𝐹! + 𝐾! + 𝐾! + 𝐷  

 The  basic  reproduction  number  and  equilibrium  state  of  this  system  can  be  found  algebraically.  The  basic  reproduction  number  is:    

Page 3: 16042 Medley et al Supplmentary Information · 2015-12-02 · Microsoft Word - 16042 Medley et al Supplmentary Information .docx Created Date: 11/30/2015 1:15:50 PM ...

3  

𝑅! = 𝛽!𝛽!

𝜎 + 𝜇+ 1 − 𝑝

𝜎𝜎 + 𝜇

𝛽!𝑎 + 𝑏 + 𝜇

1 +𝑏

𝑎 + 𝛼 + 𝜇

+𝑎

𝑎 + 𝑏 + 𝜇1

𝑐 + 𝜇+

𝑎𝑎 + 𝑏 + 𝜇

𝑐𝑐 + 𝜇

+𝑏

𝑎 + 𝑏 + 𝜇𝑎

𝑎 + 𝛼 + 𝜇  

1𝑑 + 𝜇

 

+  𝛽!𝜎

𝜎 + 𝜇𝑝

+ 1 − 𝑝𝑎

𝑎 + 𝑏 + 𝜇𝑐

𝑐 + 𝜇𝑑

𝑑 + 𝜇

+𝑏

𝑎 + 𝑏 + 𝜇1

𝑎 + 𝛼 + 𝜇𝑎

𝑑𝑑 + 𝜇

+ 𝛼1𝜇

 

   The  parameter  values  are  given  in  Table  S1.    Table  S1  Parameter  descriptions  and  values    

Parameter  Symbol  

Description   Source   Value  

a   Rate  of  progression  from  F  to  K  

Inferred  from  patient  histories  

constant  across  locations;  the  duration  is  >33  days,  <55days,  depending  on  parameter  set  

b   Rate  of  progression  Fn  to  Fh  

Inferred  from  patient  histories  

location  and  parameter  set  specific  

c   Rate  of  progression  Kn  to  Kh  

Inferred  from  patient  histories  

location  and  parameter  set  specific,  >1/5days  

d   Rate  of  diagnosis,  progression  from  Kh  to  D  

Inferred  from  patient  histories  

location  and  parameter  set  specific  

μ   Human  life  expectancy  

Assumed   1/50yrs  

N   Population  size   Assumed   10,000  

σ   Rate  of  progression  from  Latent  to  symptoms  (F)  

Assumed,  based  on  duration  of  fever  and  observed  delays  between  sandfly  activity  and  disease  peaks  in  seasonal  environments  

1/80d  

1-­‐p   Proportion  of  infections  that  result  in  KA  

Literature   4%  [Ref  13]  

Page 4: 16042 Medley et al Supplmentary Information · 2015-12-02 · Microsoft Word - 16042 Medley et al Supplmentary Information .docx Created Date: 11/30/2015 1:15:50 PM ...

4  

βO   Overall  transmission  coefficient  

Assumed   Either  varied  (Figure  3),  or  fixed  at  1.0  per  day  (Figures  4,  5,  6)  

βL   Relative  infectiousness  of  Latently  infected  (L)  

Assumed,  based  on  estimates  of  Stauch  [6]  

Either  varied  (Figure  3),  or  fixed  at  0.001  (Figures  4,  5,  6)  

βF   Relative  infectiousness  of  non-­‐specific  symptoms  (F)  

Assumed,  based  on  estimates  of  Stauch  [6]  

Either  varied  (Figure  3),  or  fixed  at  0.1  (Figures  4,  5,  6)  

βD   Relative  infectiousness  of  Dormant  infected  (D)  

Assumed,  based  on  estimates  of  Stauch  [6],  and  propensity  of  the  model  to  reproduce  ~15yr  oscillations  

Fixed  at  0.000001  (see  text  and  SI)  

   

 All  model  simulations  are  performed  in  Matlab  (version  2015a).