16 Brown j World Aff 203

download 16 Brown j World Aff 203

of 7

Transcript of 16 Brown j World Aff 203

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    1/15

    Citation: 16 Brown J. World Aff. 203 2009-2010

    Content downloaded/printed from

    HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org)

    Fri Mar 20 18:55:40 2015

    -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance

      of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license

      agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License

    -- The search text of this PDF is generated from

    uncorrected OCR text.

    -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope

      of your HeinOnline license, please use:

      https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do?

    &operation=go&searchType=0

    &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=1072-6799

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    2/15

    Role odels and

    Policy Rights

    ALICE

    AMSDEN

    Professor

    Massachusetts

    Institute

    of

    Technology

    FASTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WAS ONCE associated with a good theory but

    in

    the

    prosperous Golden Age that

    followed

    World

    War

    II from roughly

    1947 to

    1980 poor

    countries

    tended to

    learn from each other

    not from

    abstractions.

    They

    experimented

    with policies and institutions based on those

    of

    an outstanding role model.'

    As

    this form

    of learning evolved, economic growth rates in

    nearly all

    Third World

    regions

    reached

    unprecedented

    heights. For

    the first time

    in modern

    history Third World economies

    grew

    faster

    than

    First

    World

    economies,

    as

    seen

    in

    Table

    1

    Then

    in

    the

    counter-age

    of

    203

      economic

    Liberalism, from 1981

    to

    the

    2000s,

    when

    developing

    country policymaking

    became tightly tied to theories

    of

    market behavior growth rates in

    almost

    all regions

    fell.2 Intolerance

    of non-market provisions in the areas of

    trade

    industry ownership

    and employment

    became a

    hallmark of

    a new globalism,

    as the former

    colonial

    pow-

    ers returned to

    their ideal of

    universalism, a one-policy

    agenda

    for

    rich

    and poor

    countries alike no matter how many or diverse;

    this

    was the only cost-effective way to

    govern them. Yet

    the survival of

    role models

    depends

    on policy rights, or the freedom

    against possible foreign opposition from

    Washington

    to

    the World

    Bank to choose

    the policies that role models

    themselves

    once followed,

    towards foreign

    investment

    and

    capital

    controls

    or

    trade

    agreements

    and

    job

    formation.

    Given

    their thirst

    for diversity

    in

    a

    world

    celebrating

    one particular set

    of

    market policies

    for all, the question arises

    of

    whether or not

    role

    models

    have

    been

    left in limbo

    and

    with

    them an empirically

    grounded deductive way of

    thinking about

    economic growth?

    ALICE AMSDEN is the Barton L. Weller Professor

    of

    Political

    Economy in the

    Department of Urban

    Stud-

    ies

    and

    Planning at

    the

    Massachusetts Institute

    of Technology. She was recently appointed

    by

    the

    United

    Nations

    secretary-general

    to

    a

    three-year seat on the UN Committee on Development Policy.

    Her work

    focuses on

    issues

    of development and poverty eradication.

    Copyright @ 2 9 by

    the Brown

    JournalofWorld ffairs

    FALL/WINTER 2 9 *

    VOLUM

    XVI ISSU

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    3/15

    ALICE AMSDEN

    Today's

    global

    culture

    celebrates electoral

    rights,

    education

    rights,

    human

    rights,

    housing

    rights,

    health

    rights and women's

    rights-anything

    but country-specific policy

    rights.

    Developing countries

    discovered role models

    among their

    peers, in geographical

    proximity. This

    tendency

    gave rise

    to

    two

    regional

    clusters of

    role

    models,

    with pure

    theory left to influence

    mostly

    fiscal and monetary policies-even so,

    countries

    like

    Brazil, China and India tend to follow

    fiscal

    and monetary policies based on their ow n

    histories,

    not

    abstract theories.

    The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries OPEC) is associated

    with a price cartel.

    But

    the

    OPEC

    development model also revolves around a profes-

    sionally managed state-owned

    oil

    company,

    which

    was formerly a private multinational

    concession,

    nationalized after

    political

    independence. In East Asia,

    import-substitution

    industrialization

    ISI) became

    the basis of

    a

    role model radiating from

    Japan,

    in

    which

    domestic

    markets

    were

    seized from

    foreign

    companies, and

    then exports

    were

    extracted

    from import substitutes to enter foreign markets. Latin America, with both oil wealth

    and

    manufacturing experience, combined the two

    models.

    Africa,

    without

    manufactur-

    ing experience or oil-until recent

    discoveries-could not

    break into

    either circle.

    The

    shift in the

    cognitive

    approach

    to

    economic development, away from de -

    ductive market

    theories towards

    inductive

    role

    models,

    was an

    integral

    part

    of

    the de-

    204 colonization

    process that followed World War II, starting in 1947 with India's

    political

    independence.

    A

    culture

    of

    anti-imperialism pushed independence beyond

    politics

    into

    economics,

    in

    what became a novel nationalist approach

    to

    late development, with

    nationally owned and controlled companies (private or public) at

    its

    core.

    The

    edge

    of the envelope was the

    Latin

    America

    missed

    the

    cathartic

    effectb

    Chinese Revolution 1927-1949) that ex

    of twentieth-century

    decolonization.

    propriated

    not

    only

    foreign governments

    but

    also foreign firms, as did India

    using

    tamer

    tactics, such as acquiring British firms,

    exhausted from

    depression and war, at firesale

    prices.

    Korea and Taiwan inherited

    the investments of

    Japanese-owned zaibatsu when

    Tokyo

    conceded

    military

    defeat.

    Indonesia

    acquired

    Dutch

    companies

    when the Dutch

    government fled after a long nationalist

    struggle.

    In contrast, the Philippines was one

    of

    the first of

    its generation

    to

    gain political independence,

    from the United States, but

    never

    showed

    the

    door to U.S.-owned

    firms.

    A

    large

    stock

    of

    inward foreign investment

    was

    also

    true of

    Latin America,

    which

    missed

    the cathartic effect of

    twentieth-century

    decolonization. Multinationals that

    arrived

    in

    Latin America

    before World

    War

    Tw o

    simply remained, although some electric

    power

    industries and railroads

    were

    national-

    ized.4 With implacable foreign firms, there was crowding out

    of

    private nationally

    owned

    companies

    in

    industries

    like automobiles.'

    By

    this

    account,

    fast-growing

    East

    THE

    BROWN JOURNAL

    OF

    WORLD

    AFFAIRS

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    4/15

    Role oded

    and Policy

    i hts

    Asia

    (excluding the Philippines) is more nationalist than Latin America.

    The

    Middle

    East, by appropriating

    the

    concessions

    of the

    world's largest oil

    companies,

    named the

    Seven

    Sisters, shows

    a

    degree

    of

    nationalism

    that is easily equal to that of

    East

    Asia.

    By

    the

    same

    reckoning, both

    East

    Asia

    and the Middle

    East enjoy

    more

    policy

    rights

    than Latin America, or more freedom to decide, against foreign opposition, if any,

    which

    nationalist economic measures to introduce. The strength

    of

    role models today

    thus depends on the

    strength

    of heir policy rights. The

    greater

    their rights, the greater

    their latitude

    to choose

    the policies

    best

    suited

    to raising

    their global

    competitiveness,

    income and wealth to the

    level

    of

    their

    role model.

    If the two great role models

    of the

    late-twentieth century, OPEC and ISI

    had

    failed, if they had not raised

    national

    incomes and

    spread

    to

    other

    countries, then as

    the world

    returned

    to an open-market

    system

    after

    1980 policy rights

    would probably

    have

    expired. But they

    did

    not fail,

    and

    that

    did

    not

    happen.

    Washington,

    the World

    Bank, and

    the

    World Trade Organization are quick

    to

    label

    the

    role models

    of

    the Far

    East

    and

    Middle East

    s failures.

    After

    the

    East

    Asian financial crisis of 1997 Asia's role

    model

    was pronounced

    dead, and once

    oil

    was discovered

    outside the Middle East, the

    OPEC

    cartel,

    let

    alone the

    OPEC development

    model, was

    relegated to

    the

    dustbin

    of history. True, income growth

    in

    the Middle East and Asia slowed under neo-liberal

    policies, but hardly to a crawl, and

    not

    at all

    in

    ndia and China,

    whose

    reforms, like

    the policy framework of the

    two

    role

    models themselves,

    were

    a

    mixture of market 205

    and

    state,

    and

    whose

    demand

    for

    raw

    materials,

    2000

    through

    2008

    created

    a

    boom

    in Third World mineral

    economies.

    Instead of failing, the

    East

    Asian role model

    has

    adapted

    import substitution

    to mature high-tech industries.'

    The OPEC development

    model, apart from

    the

    OPEC cartel, has

    inspired

    the Bolivaristas

    Venezuela, Ecuador,

    Bolivia, and a

    total

    of eleven Latin

    American

    countries), the resource-rich BRICs (Brazil,

    Russia, India and

    China),

    and

    40 poor

    oil-producing countries

    (about one-third of

    the developing world still at the

    bottom

    of the hydrocarbon value chain. The top

    ten

    companies

    in oil and gas reserves are all

    state-owned,

    and

    from the

    developing world.

    National oil companies threaten to do to the U.S. oil, g s and petrochemical industries

    what Japanese factories-and now

    Korean

    and Chinese

    factories-once

    did

    to

    the

    U.S.

    car and

    electronics

    industries.

    National role

    models

    have

    survived the return to

    power

    of a theory-driven global

    regime

    because

    this regime, however monolithic in

    appearance,

    is being fractured in

    practice

    by

    its own institutional

    wear and

    tear.

    It started to

    unravel once

    the

    de-colo-

    nized generation

    began to compete

    in world markets.

    As developed countries

    felt

    the

    heat of new competition, they ran helter-skelter, seeking more

    leeway

    in

    setting their

    own policies to strengthen industries back home. The upshot is a large underground,

    or

    demimonde,

    where

    countries promulgate

    free

    trade

    by

    day

    but

    practice

    state-pro-

    FALL/WINTER 2 9 *

    VOLUM

    XVI,

    ISSUE

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    5/15

    ALICE AMSDEN

    motion of industries by night.

      acktracking

    is

    most evident in international trade, the backbone of globalism.

    Protective

    tariffs remain low, but trade is no longer

    free, s

    theoretically defined. De-

    spite the

    rhetoric,

    regional

    trade agreements

    like

    NAFTA

    favor

    member

    countries

    over

    non-members, the antithesis of

    a evel

    playing field.

    As

    India

    noted openly at

    a

    WTO

    meeting, it is

    well

    documented that

    Regional

    Trade Agreements are proliferating

    and

    most

    of

    global

    trade isconducted on preferential terms. ' The World Trade Organization

    itself,once a

    bastion of

    transparency, is opaque in its governance.

    According to the Ma-

    laysian

    delegate,

    Well,

    [the WTO]

    issupposed

    be democratic-it

    ismember

    driven,

    and

    every

    member has

    a

    vote

    So it has all the elements of

    a

    democratic

    institution,

    on

    paper at least... In

    practice,

    there

    have been complaints

    that the

    agenda

    is

    dictated

    very

    few

    powerful countries. '

    The usiness tandardof India reported that a demand

    from

    the

    WTO s then director, Mr.

    Pascal

    Lamy,

    for a 30

    percent

    pay

    hike at

    a

    time

    of

    global

    wage

    deflation, was

    not

    handled democratically

    by

    the WTO s budgetary com-

    mittee, but was decided

    against

    by rich

    members

    behind closed

    doors.'o

    In the milieu

    of

    the demimonde, where ll policymakers enjoy a

    degree of

    free-

    dom,

    role models

    survive.

    The

    practical

    question

    is how

    effective are

    they likely

    to be

    in

    running

    an

    underground pro-industry policy?

    We would

    argue

    that the effectiveness of

    nformal

    policymaking depends on two

    2 6

    rather disconnected influences: first, the quality of

    key government economic bureau-

    cracies;

    and

    second,

    their

    relationship

    to

    the

    grassroots

    anti-poverty

    movement, which

    attempts to return decision- making

    power

    to local people.

    The

    higher

    the quality

    of

    national universities, national civil service entrance exams; and the greater the national

    orientation of high government officials, measured by the geographical locus of their

    tertiary

    degree,

    then the better

    will

    be policy coordination. The more cooperative

    rela-

    tions

    are between anti-poverty activists

    and government economic planners (most

    now

    democratically elected), the more effective policy implementation will be.

    Below we discretely draw

    the curtain on the demimonde, show

    some

    data on

    the education of top economic bureaucrats (in the BRICs), and finally,

    note

    the need

    for a stronger alliance between bureaucrats

    and

    activists.

      NOBODY GAvE

    DAMN

    The

    first generation ofpost-Independence leaders

    was

    able to en joy nearly

    unrestrained

    policy

    rights

    because, s Richard

    Nixon observed,

    nobody

    gave a

    damn.

    The de-

    veloping

    economies

    were

    less

    interesting to

    Wall

    Street

    or Washington than Western

    Europe, the target

    in

    the 195 s of American

    multinationals, just

    s

    Meiji

    Japan

    was

    less

    interesting to

    investors

    than

    Reconstruction profiteering

    after the

    American

    Civil

    THE

    BROWN JOURN L OF WORLD

    FF IRS

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    6/15

    Role

    oded

    and

    Policy Rights

    War.

    1

    But s

    Japan

    recovered from military defeat and

    its

    exports boomed, and s com-

    petition from the whole

    Japanese role model aureole commenced,

    everything

    changed.

    Suddenly the United States gave a big damn.

    Today's regional

    trade

    agreements

    signal

    the tensions

    of

    universalism,

    of

    a

    shoe

    that

    is

    too

    tight

    for too

    many

    feet.

    TH

    MIMON

    Poor countries were

    divided over

    the WTO's

    formation in

    1994-some gained,

    some

    lost,

    so

    no

    consensus emerged

    over

    what to do.

    Instead,

    dissatisfied countries

    sought

    autonomy with subterfuges.14

    As

    they descended into

    a

    demimonde, the

    habituees

    they

    rubbed shoulders

    with

    were none other than the

    advocates

    ofopen markets. Hypocrisy

    in any demimonde is

    r nk

    One

    American subterfuge was

    the

    military

    industrial

    complex-a

    term

    in

    President

    Eisenhower's 1961 farewell address.'

    The United

    States Department of Defense

    and

    National Institute

    of Health are

    mainstays

    of

    U S

    private manufacturing, subsidizing

    industries ranging

    from batteries and aerospace to bio-tech and agriculture. Manufactur-

    ers and

    the military

    bonded after

    the American Revolution.

    Ironically, modern factory

    management

    had

    its genesis in the

    United

    States (the most pro-market

    country

    in

    the

    world in

    the Government Springfield

    Armory in

    Massachusetts.

    Defense industries are

    not adjudicated

    under

    WTO

    rules, and

    so governments

    are

    free to promote

    them. 7

    Despite big

    armies

    in

    Russia,

    India and

    China,

    developing countries invented

    different subterfuges. They used

    both piecemeal

    artifices s well s

    multi-billion

    dollar

    science

    parks to undertake the technological and organizational experimentation neces-

    sary

    to move into higher skilled industries. The difference between the military-indus-

    trial complex model and the

    science

    park model is that the former builds

    technologies,

    while the

    latter builds

    technologies

    with, inter-connectedly,

    specific nationally

    owned

    firms. R D

    is

    also

    not

    adjudicated

    by

    the

    WTO,

    so

    science

    parks

    can

    promote new

    industries and firms so long s there is money.

    Piecemeal policies in the demimonde may

    have

    failed in

    droves,

    but

    some

    were

    highly effective in raising skilled

    employment. The

    Indian government allowed

    the In-

    dian-owned pharmaceutical

    industry

    to violate foreign product

    patents, but not

    pro ss

    patents, which contributed

    to e fficient

    manufacturing and cheap

    drugs (the adjudica-

    tion

    of

    healthcare

    industries

    under

    the

    WTO is ambiguous).

    Besides pharmaceuticals,

    developing

    countries have called for

    the

    relaxation of

    intellectual property rights on

    climate

    friendly technologies under

    the United

    Nations Framework

    Convention on

    Climate Change-all industries

    related

    to the environment

    can

    be state-supported.

    Regarding foreign capital flows, while financial liberalization was the

    primary

    factor

    behind

    East

    Asia's

    1997

    financial

    crash, Korea

    was

    forced to

    keep

    its

    financial

    markets

    FALL/WINTER 2 9

    VOLUM

    XVI, ISSUE

    I

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    7/15

    ALICE AMSDEN

    open

    after an IMF bailout. The Finance Ministry

    responded

    by using modern technology

    to monitor

    every

    financial flow on a minute-to-minute basis to reduce risk and quicken

    government

    response,

    in

    effect, closing markets after hitting a ceiling. To reduce export

    dependence on the

    U S

    market,

    Korea offered subsidies to

    companies

    that

    exported to

    other destinations

    (in

    distress, countries can protect their

    balance

    of payments).

    Thus, WTO members are themselves responsible for weakening their own ba n

    on subsidies by agreeing not to

    adjudicate

    large

    chunks of

    what was once

    called indus-

    trial policy.

    One of the fastest

    growing

    sectors

    in

    the world economy

    is energy

    and

    the

    environment, and any

    country

    with money can

    vigorously

    promote

    them without being

    taken

    to

    court for

    violating

    WTO provisions.

    Chinese

    government research subsidies

    are increasing

    rapidly

    for electric car designs, for example; and

    tax

    credits are planned

    for consumption

    of

    alternative energy

    vehicles.

    The

    world

    over, states

    and municipali-

    ties can offer

    perks to

    businesses

    to influence

    their location

    decisions. Poor

    regions

    in

    Thailand

    use

    subsidies

    to attract automobile assemblers. The U S state

    of

    Massachusetts

    bankrolls

    the

    movie business and

    the

    life

    sciences, and allows not-yet-profitable

    start-ups

    to

    convert

    tax credits into

    cash.

    Subsidies

    can flow

    to

    science

    parks, R&D

    institutes,

    high-tech industries, and small-scale enterprise-without

    these exceptions,

    probably

    no

    developed country

    would have joined the WTO. Planners can use land

    grants

    to

    promote regional

    development,

    and

    government

    procurement

    officers

    can

    attach

    condi-

    208

    tions on firms that

    compete

    for public contracts:

    when Korea built a

    high-speed rail,

    it

    insisted

    that

    every

    bidder

    transfer

    enough technology

    to enable Korean

    companies

    in their

    own

    right to

    bid

    on

    overseas

    high speed

    rail

    projects.

    Hyundai

    Rotem, Korea's

    premier high-speed

    rail

    manufacturer now has contracts

    to

    build commuter

    rail

    systems

    in

    Canada, Turkey, and

    the

    United

    States.

    American trade officials viewed China's

    export tax rebates

    as a form

    of

    protection,

    but, surprisingly,

    tax

    rebates

    did not violate

    World Trade Organization

    provisions. '6

    To

    avoid

    a clash,

    both giants

    agreed

    to

    offer developing

    economies S20

    billion

    in sub-

    sidized

    export

    credits to help them buy

    more Chinese

    and American goods, flagrantly

    violating

    the

    WTO equal

    treatment principle for

    all other

    countries.

    If

    anyone says neo-liberalism lives,

    they

    are

    right

    insofar

    as that is the law.

    they

    say,

    neo-liberalism is

    dead,

    that is right, in

    a

    sense, as well-the law is increas-

    ingly

    evaded.

    NATIONAL BUREAUCRATS

    If

    a

    country

    pursues

    free market policies, its chief

    economic bureaucrats

    must

    be

    trained in a U S or British economics department. If by contrast, a country's policies

    are

    role

    model

    driven,

    then

    its

    bureaucrats must

    be experienced in

    building heterodox

    THE

    BROWN

    JOURNAL OF

    WORLD

    AFFAIRS

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    8/15

    Role oded

    and Policy

    ights

    institutions-those

    deviating from free

    market

    prescriptions-and implementing

    them in national contexts. The

    latter

    type

    of

    bureaucracy,

    t

    turns out,

    has

    survived in

    at

    least

    Korea and the BRICs, despite

    5 years of

    liberal attempts at taking the state

    back out.

    The orientation of top economic civil servants may be proxied by

    where

    they

    earned

    their

    graduate degree,

    if any. If top officials in

    the

    ministry

    of

    finance, industry

    and central bank all

    study for

    their masters or Ph.D

    degrees in

    leading U.S.

    econom-

    ics

    departments, t is

    reasonable to expect

    that their

    policy

    preferences will

    fall

    on

    the

    orthodox side.

    By

    contrast, countries whose

    civil

    servants

    must pass rigorous

    exams, and

    whose local universities are

    able

    to train them at world standards, are likely to

    operate

    successfully

    with an activist state.

    Following

    World

    War

    II, little public money existed

    in

    the

    de-colonized world

    for sending promising public

    officials

    abroad for

    schooling.

    Even today, civil

    servants

    in poor countries, even India, are just beginning

    to

    have foreign

    degrees,

    while

    national

    universities still suffer

    from

    financial

    hardship;

    this is evidence

    of

    poverty

    rather

    than

    nationalism.

    The role

    model

    for a

    national

    orientation is perhaps Korea, because

    of

    its

    mix

    of local and foreign degrees, made

    possible by

    the high quality of its

    own

    universi-

    ties (as in all the

    BRICs ,

    where civil servants can get a

    first-rate

    education,

    not

    just in

    economic

    modeling but also in national economic and diplomatic history.

    Korea

    now gives the

    appearance of

    being wholly

    Americanized.

    Japan's

    popula-

    209

    tion

    is

    about three-times

    that

    of

    Koreas,

    but

    since

    at

    least

    1970,

    Koreans

    outnumber

    Japanese earning economic

    Ph.Ds in

    the United States:

    in

    2000, the ratio of A-TKFs

    (American-trained Korean economists) to A-TJEs (American-trained Japanese

    economists) was

    39 to 16.1

    Nearly 100 percent of

    the tenured faculty in the

    econom-

    ics

    departments

    of

    the best Korean universities is U.S.-trained, and about

    9

    percent

    of economists in

    a leading

    macroeconomic think-tank, Korea Development

    Institute,

    hold U.S.

    degrees.

    Nevertheless,

    unlike Koreas

    a

    universities which lack

    diversity

    its

    economic

    bureaucracies are

    more balanced.

    In

    2009, a orientation

    is

    perhaps

    Korea.

    typical pattern

    of

    foreign

    and local degrees was

    evident

    in

    Korea's

    Ministry of

    Strategy

    and

    Finance:

    the Minister

    and two

    Vice Ministers all held higher degrees from

    both

    foreign and local universities, suggesting a mixture of influences.

    In Brazil, nearly all high-level officials in

    the

    Ministry

    of

    Finance and Ministry

    of

    Planning

    hold Brazilian Ph.Ds; the

    one U.S.

    degree

    is

    from

    a radical

    U.S.

    university

    (New

    School

    for Social Research).

    In

    Russia, not

    only do

    the

    economics

    ministries

    not

    have

    foreign-trained economists, they probably do not

    have

    any

    economists. Ex-

    plains one researcher, most senior officials would actually be engineers, scientists, and

    mathematicians, with

    degrees

    from the

    Soviet's

    best universities. 2

    0

    India's

    economic

    FALL WINTER

    2 9 *

    VOLUM

    XVI, ISSU

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    9/15

    ALICE AMSDEN

    ministries,

    like

    Russias, have

    ahigh ratio of domestic to foreign

    degrees,

    although

    this

    is changing, as more money is available

    for

    study abroad.

    Despite

    China's

    rapid

    West-

    ernization,

    its finance ministry and National

    Development and

    Reform Commission

    are

    almost

    totally

    run

    by

    elites

    from

    China's

    own

    best

    universities.

    There is thus a well-educated national

    civil

    service in the BRICKs

    (including

    Korea) to coordinate a later stage

    of

    development policies, those that

    have

    gone

    un-

    derground.

    TH UNDERGROUND

    AND

    THE GRASSROOTS

    As

    governmental organizations were marginalized,

    non-governmental

    organizations

    (NGOs)

    mushroomed, part

    of a

    vast grassroots

    anti-poverty

    movement

    that

    has

    come

    to unite World

    Watch,

    for

    example,

    amonitor of the environment,

    the

    World Bank,

    the Ford Foundation and other elite bodies with large field offices, and unpaid vol-

    unteers

    in

    the thousands, including students,

    scientists

    and engineers, working with

    local counterparts to improve how poor people are

    clothed,

    housed and fed.

    Activists

    are

    politically

    diverse

    (witness the November 1999

    Seattle demonstrations

    against the

    WTO , yet elite aid networks are generally hostile towards

    state

    activism, and want a

    redistribution

    of

    power over poverty from top-down to bottom-up. Amartya Sen, a

    21 Nobel economics laureate, described the top-down

    approach

    as

    fierce,

    meaning

    tough

    on

    the

    poor,

    and the

    grassroots

    approach,

    to which

    he

    has

    contributed

    so

    much,

    as

     friendly ( congeniality

    is

    exemplified

    by

    such things as mutually beneficial exchanges

    [of which Adam Smith spoke eloquently], or by the working of

    social

    safety

    nets,

    or

    of political

    liberties, or

    of

    social

    development ).

    But

    redistribution, however friendly has

    been

    a

    disaster

    in

    fact:

    extreme

    poverty

    has

    not fallen at

    all

    in

    many

    developing

    regions

    in

    th

    l st

    5 years f course,

    things

    might have

    been

    worse if the

    grassroots

    had

    not

    grown, but by the same logic,

    things

    might have

    been much

    better if governments

    hadn't been

    squeezed out of irrigation,

    rural

    electrification (China excels as a role model), and industrialization (to

    create

    paid

    workers

    instead of

    volunteers .12

    As

    seen

    in

    Table 2,

    based on World Bank

    data

    for

    1981 to 2 5 and

    established

    estimation

    techniques,

    abject

    poverty has

    not fallen in

    Latin America or Africa,

    despite

    the enormous effort and

    energy

    directed there.21 The

    welfare

    of

    the poor may

    have

    increased, leading to a

    rise

    in life expectancy. But the

    failure

    of poverty rates

    to

    fall suggests

    that higher

    life

    expectancy increases

    population

    growth rates which,

    in Malthusian

    fashion,

    lead

    to diminishing

    returns. The

    poor

    live

    longer but don't consume more.

    The failure to reduce abject poverty

    can

    be

    traced

    to an abstraction, a strong belief

    that supply

    creates

    its

    own

    demand. 24

    Like

    Say,

    grassroots

    activists

    imagine

    incorrectly

    THE

    BROWN

    JOURN L OF

    WORLD

    AFFAIRS

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    10/15

    Role oded

    and Policy

    i hts

    that what awaits a supply of better clothed, housed, and fed workers is the demand

    to

    employ

    it

    at

    a

    living

    wage.

    Yet if unemployment already exists, then to invest more

    in

    workers' capabilities may

    create

    more unemployed job seekers, not more

    jobs.

    2

    5

    Call

    thiw

    the

    Kerala

    Effect,

    after the

    South

    Indian

    state

    which

    has

    experienced

    rising

    educational attainments

    but not

    decreasing poverty. With sluggish demand, people

    may simply be forced

    to hire themselves

    at

    starvation

    wages, and enter into mutually

    beneficial exchanges as Sen puts it at

    near subsistence

    rates of

    return.

    While education

    and

    development

    are

    closely

    linked

    if

    more

    money

    is poured

    into tertiary

    education,

    graduates

    are likely

    to add to the

    educated unemployed, or the

    exodus of talent

    abroad.

    For one,

    educated

    unemployment in Indonesia

    is

    estimated

    to

    have

    exceeded 787 800

    in 2007.26 Thus,

    jobs

    do not necessarily make an

    appearance

    simply

    because

    the supply

    of qualified

    jo seekers improves as a result

    of grassroots

    activism. The demand

    side

    must

    also

    be

    improved,

    and this

    requires

    the government.

    CONCLUSION

    Amidst the paroxysms

    that

    accompanied

    de-colonization after World War II indepen-

    dent countries extended their newly won

    political freedoms into

    the economic

    realm.

    They exited the market model and entered adeductive world

    where

    they learned from

    role

    models

    (the OPEC group

    in the

    hydrocarbon industries

    and Japan

    in electronics

    211

    and

    automobiles). They experimented

    with

    novel

    policies and

    institutions

    to

    escape

    past failures and to develop,

    which

    at the time meant increasing

    productivity

    raising

    the number of paid jobs to near full employment, and achieving balance of payments

    stability.

    As

    role models advanced, economic growth in income and per

    capita

    income

    soared

    to unprecedented heights see Table

    1

    To

    implement

    a

    role

    model

    rather than amarket theory is

    to

    be

    pragmatic,

    and pragmatism necessitates policy rights, or the freedom to implement a range

    of

    development provisions that may

    face

    foreign opposition on the

    grounds

    that they

    deviate from market theory.

    Yet

    today's

    global culture celebrates

    property rights, elec-

    toral

    rights,

    education

    rights,

    human

    rights,

    housing

    rights,

    health

    rights

    and

    women's

    rights-anything but

    country-specific policy rights,

    which the

    de-colonized generation

    struggled long and hard to achieve.

    Does

    this

    mean

    that the role model is ruined as a

    cognitive

    form of

    development,

    and

    civilization is returning

    to

    the colonial age,

    when

    Britain

    adopted

    a

    universalist

    economic approach to

    govern its

    large and diverse empire? Can

    heterogeneous role

    models survive in today's ideological straightjacket?

    The

    answer to this question is empirically grounded, like role models them-

    selves.

    Powerful developing countries,

    the

    BRICs

    and

    other

    emerging

    economies

    con-

    FALL/WINTER 2 9 VOLUME XVI ISSUE I

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    11/15

    ALICE AMSDEN

    tinue

    to implement heterodox economic policies in

    a

    dense demimonde,

    rubbing

    shoulders

    with

    developed

    countries,

    all searching for clever new ways to promote their

    own

    industries-a

    competition which is arguably

    healthy

    compared to protectionism

    using

    tariffs.

    To

    coordinate underground

    policies, these

    countries

    still have

    what

    it

    takes:

    an able national economic bureaucracy, locally trained and tested. The big challenge

    is poverty alleviation and adding a top down

    angle

    to the grass roots

    approach,

    which

    failed in the

    last

    5 years to decrease

    Africas worst

    indigence see Table

    2).

      fwe

    gingerly

    look 5 years out, and

    imagine

    what the world economy will look

    like, we already know twill not conform to the

    classification

    t followed after

    World

    War

    II where countries belonged either to the First

    World,

    Second World (Soviet countries ,

    or

    hird

    World.

    The

    Second category isalready gone, and the Third category isunlikely

    to vanish

    in

    a

    velvet revolution, but

    a

    big chunk of the

    de-colonized

    generation,

    in

    terms of land mass and

    population,

    is

    now floating between worlds.

    If

    underground

    policy making continues, and if government bureaucracies

    remain

    national

    in

    orienta-

    tion

    which is

    almost

    certain, then the global

    economy of

    2 35 is

    likely

    to exhibit a

    high degree of

    diversity although just

    how

    much is

    not

    yet

    clear.

     

    THE

    BROWN

    JOURN L OF

    WORLD

    AFFAIRS

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    12/15

    Role oded

    and Policy

    Rights

    TABLE 1.

    GDP

    GROWTH RATE

    AND GDP P R

    CAPITA GROWTH RATE, 1950 2000

    Region GDP Growth

    Rates

    GDP

    Per

    Capita Growth

    Rates

    1950-1980 1980-2000 1950-1980

    1980-2000

    Western Europe 4.20 2.20 3.2

    4

      2.0

    6

     

    United

    States

    3.47

    3.45

    1.79

    1.93

    Japan

    7.10 2.65 5.50

    2.12

    Developed

    4.12 2.46 3 0

    6

      1.97

    Countries

    Average

      astern

    urope

    5.46 0.41

    4.31 -0.85

    and USSR

    Latin

    America

    4.75

    2.32

    2

    15 0.55

    Asia

    East Asia

    6.90

    5.83 4.11

    3.43

    South Asia

    3.98

    5.05

    1.21

    2.49

    Middle

    East 8.04

    2.03

    3.01 0.47

    Africa

    North

    Africa 5.32

    Africa, South

    of 3.70

    Sahara

    3.56

    2.61

    2.30

    1.20

    1.25

    -0.12

    Developing

    5.06 3.02

    2.04 0.75

    Countries

    Average

    Source: World Tables, Johns Hopkins University (1980, 1994) and

    WorldDevelopmentIndicdtors

    World

    Bank

    (2002),

    http://www.worldbank.org.

    FALL/WINTER 2009 * VOLUME XVI,

    ISSUE

    I

      3

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    13/15

    ALICE AMSDEN

    TABLE 2.

    POVERTYS PERSISTENCE

    IN AFRICA AND

    LATIN

    AMERICA, 1981-2005

    Poverty Gap

    index

    x100)

    Region 1981

    1990 1999

    2005

    East

    Asia

    and

    Pacific

    A)

    35.5

    18.2

    10.7

    4

    Of

    which

    China

    (B)

    39.3

    20.7

    11.1

    4

    Eastern

    Europe

    and

    Central

    Asia

    [C]

    0 4

    0.6

    1.6

    1.1

    Latin

    America

    and

    Caribbean

    D)

    4

    3.6

    4.2

    3.2

    Middle

    East

    and

    North

    Africa

    E)

    1.6

    0.9

    0.8

    0.8

    South

    Asia

    F)

    19.6

    15.2

    11.7

    1 3

      f

    which India

    G)

    19.6

    14.6

    11.7

    10.5

    Sub-Saharan

    Africa

    H)

    22.9

    26.6

    25.7

    21.1

    Total

    I)

    21.3

    14.2

    10.9

    7.6

    Percentage

    below

    1.25 / day

    Region 1981

    1990 1999 2005

    East

    Asia

    and Pacific

    A)

    77.7 54.7 35.5 16.8

    Of which China

    (B)

    84

    60.2

    35.6

    15.9

    Eastern Europe and

    Central

    Asia [C]

    1.7

    2

    5.1 3.7

    Latin

    America

    and Caribbean D) 11.5 9.8 10.8 8.4

    Middle East and North Africa E)

    7.9

    4.3 4.2 3.6

    South

    Asia

    (F)

    59.4

    51.7 44.1 40.3

    Of

    which India

    G)

    59.8 51.3

    44.8

    41.6

    Sub-Saharan

    Africa H)

    53.7

    57.9 58.2 51.2

    Total

    I)

    51.8 41.6

    33.7

    25.2

    Source:

    Shaohua

    Chen and Martin

    Ravallion Policy

    Research

    Working Paper 47 3:

    The

    Developing

    World Is Poorer Than We Thought, But No Less Successful in the Fight against

    Poverty,

    Policy Research

    Working

    Paper, no. 47 3 August 2008 ,

    World Bank Development Research

    Group,

    http://go.wxorldbank.

    org/BXEZCODA10.

    THE

    BROWN JOURNAL

    OF WORLD AFFAIRS

      4

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    14/15

    Role oded

    and Policy

    Rights

    NOTES

    1.

    This

    article

    is

    based

    on a

    book in

    progress

    entitled, A Farewell to Theory:

    Developing From

    Role

    Models.

    2.

    As

    is

    well

    known,

    growth

    rates

    in

    India and

    China

    soared

    in

    the

    later

    period,

    noted

    later.

    3. In 1938,

    Mexico

    became the first

    developing

    country to nationalize its oil industry.

    4 Argentina's first

    European multinational,

    Pirelli, established a subsidiary in 1917 that survives

    today'

    5. Alice H. Amsden, Escape

    from

    Empire: e Developing Vorld ourney brough Heaven and Hell

    (Cambridge:

    MIT Press,

    2007).

    6.

    Mature high tech

    refers

    to innovative products that are already being sold in world markets

    but

    whose

    demand is still growing

    fast. Alice H. Amsden and

    W W

    Chu, Beyond

    Late

    Development.

    Taiwan

    LUpgradingPolicies

    (Cambridge:

    MIT Press, 2003).

    7.

    Alice

    Amsden, Farewell o 7heory: Developing om Role

    Wodels

    (Cambridge: MIT

    Press, 2010),

    8. Third

    World Network, India submits proposals on

    strengthening the WTO,

    SUNS

    6739

    13

    July

    2009.

    9. Fatoumata

    Jawara

    and

    Aileen

    Kwa, Behind

    the

    Scenes

    at the

    WTO:

    The

    Real

    World ofInternamtional

    Trade

    Negotiarins(London: Zed Books, 2003).

    10. Third World

    Network,

    WTO

    head

    Pascal Lamy rebuffed on

    own pay

    rise

    attempt, SUNS

    6743

    17

    July

    2009.

    11. Alice

    H. Ansden,

    scape rom Empire:

    The Developing Worldi journey brough Heaven

    and

    Hell

    (Cambridge:

    MIT Press, 2007).

    12. E.

    Herbert Norman,

    Japan

    Emergence

    as a Vodern State

    (New York:

    Institute of

    Pacific

    Relations,

    1940).

    13. Alisa di Caprio, 'The Impact ofAsymmetric

    Free Trade Agreements on Middle-Technology

    Devel-

    oping Countries

    (doctoral

    dissertation,

    MIT

    Department

    of

    Urban

    Studies

    and Planning,

    2007).

    5

    14. Alice

    IH.Amsden and Takashi Hikino, The Bark

    is

    Worse thanrthe

    Bite:

    New' TO Law and Late

    Industrialization,

    The

    Annalh

    of

    theAmeran

    Academy

    ofPolitical

    and

    Social

    Science

    570,

    no.

    1

    (2000).

    15. The term

    is

    attributed to President Dwight D. Eishenhower,

    former Five-Star

    General, in his farewell

    address to the American

    nation on

    17

    Januar'

    1961.

    16. Mark Landler,

    Treasury's Lead Role in

    China

    in Flux,' New York

    Times

    1

    December

    2008.

    17.

    U.S. Fact Sheet: Fifth Cabinet-Level

    Meeting of

    the

    U.S.-China

    Strategic

    Economic

    Dialogue,

    U.S.

    Treasury Department, 5

    December 2008.

    18. A

    1985

    study anticipated the

    continuation of state economic interventionism

    under a liberal world

    economy.

    Peter

    B.

    Evans and Dietrich

    Ruescheineyer, Bringing he State

    Back In

    (Cambridge: Cambridge

    UP

    1985 .

    19. Data are from University of Michigan UMI) statistics on Ph.D. dissertations completed in the

    United States. Data were collected by Joo-Young Kwak,

    who

    used discretion to decide if

    a

    thesis was writ-

    ten

    by a

    Japanese national,

    Korean

    national,

    or

    Korean

    American (excluded from

    data).

    20. Statement by

    Yevgeny

    Kuznetsov, who collected data

    for

    Russia. Data were collected

    for

    other

    countries

    as

    follows: Korea, Joo young Kwak and Kyung-Min Nam; Brazil, Mansueto Almeida; India,

    Rajendra

    Kumar;

    and China,

    Jinhua Zhao. All

    based

    on published or unpublished

    government

    data.

    21.

    Amartya

    Sen,

    Developmentas

    Freedom (New York: Anchor Books, 2000): 35-36.

    22. Rural Electrification

    in China 1950-2004,

    Stanford University Program on Energy

    and

    Sustain-

    able Development Working Paper no. 60 (December

    2006),

    23. Poverty rates fell fastest in

    East

    Asia,

    with few

    grass

    roots volunteers,

    to only

    18

    percent in

    2005

    from a level

    estimated to have been

    80

    percent in

    1981,

    when Asia was the world's poorest region. The

    comparison between fierce China and friendly India tells the same tale. The

    number

    of people in

    China

    living in poverty

    fell

    to 207

    million

    in 2005 from 835

    million

    in 1981,

    while

    there

    was

    an increase

    in poverty in India,

    from 420 million in

    1981

    to 455 million in 2005.

    24. Jean Baptiste

    Say,

    a

    nineteenth

    century

    economist

    later

    discredited

    by Keynes,

    proposed

    a

    law, now

    called Say's Law, to the effect that under full employment, markets

    act

    in such a

    way

    that an economy's

    FALL/WINTER 2 9 *

    VOLUM

    XVI ISSU

  • 8/20/2019 16 Brown j World Aff 203

    15/15

    ALICE AMSDEN

    production will all be

    bought,

    without any

    unsold inventory.

    25 Sen.

    26.

    LO

    LABORSTA, http://laborsta.ilo.org.

    27.

    Alice

    H.

    Arnsden, Says Law,

    overty

    Persistence

    nd

    Employment

    Ne

    glect,

    fourn l

    ofHuman

    Development

    and

    apabilities

    11 no. 1

    2010).

      6

    THE

    BROWN JOURNAL

    OF

    WORLD

    AFFAIRS