1%52$'67 - Philadelphian carlisle st cambridge st address zoning district overlay district scope of...

AU G . 2 0 . 2 019

CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW

915-923 N BROAD ST

C I V I C D E S I G N R E V I E W

APPLICATION

CDR PROJECT APPLICATION FORM Note: For a project appl icat ion to be cons idered for a Civ ic Des ign Rev iew agenda, complete and accurate submitta ls must be received no later than 4 P.M. on the submiss ion date. A submiss ion does not guarantee p lacement on the agenda of the next CDR meet ing date.

L&I APPLICATION NUMBER: 965939

What is the trigger causing the project to require CDR Review? Explain briefly.

PROJECT LOCATION

CONTACT INFORMATION

Planning District: Council District:

Address:

Is this parcel within a Master Plan District? Yes No

Applicant Name: Primary Phone:

Email: Address:

Property Owner: Developer

Architect:

Central 5

915-923 N BROAD ST

X

Table 14-304-2: Case 2 the property is located in the district that affects residential district AND creates more than 50,000 sq.ft. and creates more than 50 additional dwelling units

YAO-CHANG HUANG 610-896-3649

[email protected] 1823 Spring Garden StPhiladelphia, PA 19107

Z REALTY LLC Z REALTY LLC

SKY DESIGN STUDIO PC (YAO-CHANG HUANG)

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19123

SITE CONDITIONS

SITE USES

COMMUNITY MEETING

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT HEARING

Community meeting held: Yes No

If yes, please provide written documentation as proof.

If no, indicate the date and time the community meeting will be held:

Date: Time:

Present Use:

Proposed Use:

Area of Proposed Uses, Broken Out by Program (Include Square Footage and # of Units):

Proposed # of Parking Units:

Site Area:

Existing Zoning: Are Zoning Variances required? Yes No

ZBA hearing scheduled: Yes No NA______

If yes, indicate the date hearing will be held:

Date:

16,000 SF

XCMX-4

1ST FLOOR: (3) COMMERCIAL SPACES

1ST FLOOR: (1)EMPTY COMMERCIAL SPACE [6,335 SF], RESIDENTIAL LOBBY [1,110 SF], (21)CAR PARKING & (24)BIKE PARKING [6,749 SF],2ND FLOOR: OFFICE/ BUSINESS [14,838 SF]3RD-7TH FLOOR: (70) DWELLING UNITS [63,182 SF]

(21) CAR PARKING(24) BIKE PARKING

X

JUL. 18. 2019 6:30 PM

SEP.18.2019 9:30 AM

X


REFERRAL & CDR RESPONSE FORM


CLIENT LETTER TO RCO


Z O N I N G DATA

W GIRARD AVE

N B

RO

AD S

T

N W

ATTS

ST

CAMBRIDGE ST

N C

ARLI

SLE

ST

ADDRESSZONING DISTRICTOVERLAY DISTRICTSCOPE OF WORK

915-923 N BROAD STCMX-4CTR- CENTER CITY OVERLAY DISTRICT6 STORY ADDITION TO EXISTING1 STORY STRUCTURE

ZONING DATA

USE REGULATIONCOMMERCIAL (RETAIL) & PARKINGBUSINESS (OFFICE)MULTI-HOUSING (70 UNITS)

1ST FLOOR2ND FLOOR3RD-7TH FLOORDEVELOPMENT STANDARD

CMX-4

100%N/A500%

MAX OCCUPIED AREAMIN SIDE YARD WIDTHMAX FLOOR AREA

100%N/A500% (79,972 SF)

ALLOWED/ REQUIRED PROPOSED

PARKING

CAR PARKINGBIKE STORAGE

3 SPACES PER 10 UNIT (70 UNITS)1 SPACE PER 3 UNIT (70 UNITS)

21 SPACES24 SPACES

ALLOWED/ REQUIRED PROPOSED

SKY PLANE REQUIREMENTS

100' & WIDER STREET (N BROAD ST) 1< 125' = 100% ALLOWED0'- 74' = 100% ALLOWED

CMX-4

RSA-5

CMX-2.5 SP-INS

RM-1

CMX-4

POPLAR ST

N

ZONING MAPLACATION ON MAP


P H O T O O F A E R I A L V I E W

1

2

3

4

LOOKINGSOUTH-EASTWARD

TOWARDS SITE

1LOOKING

NORTH-EASTWARDTOWARDS SITE

2

LOOKINGNORTH-WESTWARD

TOWARDS SITE

4

N BR

OAD

ST

N W

ATTS

ST

W GIRARD AVE

CAMBRIDGE ST

POPLAR ST LOOKINGSOUTH-WESTWARD

TOWARDS SITE

3


P H O T O O F I M M E D I AT E A R E A

1

2

5

3

4

6

7

8

LOOKINGSOUTHWARD

ON BROAD ST

1

LOOKINGNORTHWARD

ON BROAD ST

2

LOOKINGSOUTHWARD

ON N WATTS ST

3

LOOKINGNORTHWARD

ON N WATTS ST

4LOOKING

WESTWARDON CAMBRIDGE ST

8

LOOKINGACROSS BROAD ST

IN FRONT OF SITE

7

LOOKINGEASTWARD

ON POPLAR ST

6

LOOKINGEASTWARD

ON W GIRARD AVE

5

N BR

OAD

ST

N W

ATTS

ST

W GIRARD AVE

CAMBRIDGE ST

POPLAR ST


E X I ST I N G S I T E S U RV E Y

PROPERTY SURVEYAND 3-LOT

CONSOLIDATION PLAN

915-

23 N

. Bro

ad S

treet

Phila

delp

hia,

PA

1912

3(2

0th

War

d)

Cen

tury

21

Targ

et R

ealty

LLC

612

Was

hing

ton

Ave,

Uni

t 1Ph

ilade

lphi

a, P

A 19

147

EXISTING LOT DIMENSIONSEXISTING LOT CONDITION & PROPOSED 3-LOT CONSOLIDATION


P RO P O S E D G RO U N D F LO O R P L A N

UP

UP

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12131415161718192021

(21) CAR PARKING6,749 SF

MECH ELEC FIRE PUMP

MECH

BUILDING UTILITY1,800 SF

RETAIL6,335 SF

RESIDENTIAL LOBBY/AMENITIES

1,110 SF

ADJACENT BUILDING

ADJACENT BUILDING

TRASH

(28) BIKE PARKING(24 REQUIRED)

ADA/VAN

UTILITY

PROPOSEDCURB CUT

CAMBRIDGE ST

N

EXGPARKING

METER

EXGLIGHTPOLE

EXGPARKING

METER

EXGPARKING

METER

EXGLIGHTPOLE

EXGPARKING

METER

GR

ATE

4'-0

" x 3

2'-0

"

N B

RO

AD S

TREE

T(1

13' W

IDE

22'

-69'

-22'

)

3'-0" BUILDING ZONE14'-0" WALKING ZONE5'-0" FURNITURE ZONE

5'-0" 14'-0" 3'-0"

20'-0

"

N W

ATTS

STR

EET

(40'

WID

E 10

'-20'

-10'

)

PROPOSED2-6" x 2'-6"

STREETPLANTERS

22'-0"SIDEWALK


STREETPLANTERS


STREETPLANTERS


STREETPLANTERS


STREETPLANTERS


P RO P O S E D F LO O R P L A N S

DN

UP

EXITSTAIR

DNUP

DN

UP

EXITSTAIR

DNUP

OFFICE

2ND FLOOR PLAN 3RD-5TH FLOOR PLAN


P RO P O S E D F LO O R P L A N S

DN

UP

EXITSTAIR

DNUP

DN

UP

EXITSTAIR

DNUP

AMENITY

OUTDOORMECH SPACE

6TH FLOOR PLAN-LOWER LEVEL OFLOFT UNITS

7TH FLOOR PLAN-UPPER LEVEL OFLOFT UNITS


L A N D S C A P E P L A N

PILOT HOUSE

PILOT HOUSE

OUTDOORMECH SPACE

BELOW

N

STREET PLANTERS EXTENSIVE GREEN ROOF

PROPOSEDEXTENSIVE GREEN ROOF

PROPOSED(5) 2-6" x 2'-6"

STREETPLANTERS

GR

ATE

4'-0

" x 3

2'-0

"


B U I L D I N G E L E VAT I O N S

BEIGE BRICKWITH

EXTRUDEDPATTERN

GREYMETAL PANELS

BEIGECERAMIC TILES

TO MATCHEXISTINGBUILDING

LOW-EGLAZING

FRONT ELEVATION ONN BROAD ST

REAR ELEVATION ONN WATTS ST

1 2 3 4

1

2

3

4



SOUTH ELEVATION

LOW-EGLAZING

4GREY

METAL PANELS

3DARK GREY

STUCCO

2BEIGE

STUCCO

1

1

2

4

3



NORTH ELEVATION

LOW-EGLAZING

4GREY

METAL PANELS

3DARK GREY

STUCCO

2BEIGE

STUCCO

1

1

2

4

3


S I T E S E C T I O N S

RETAILRESIDENTIALLOBBY

BUSINESS/ OFFICE

RESIDENTIAL UNITS (18 UNITS)

RESIDENTIAL LOFT UNITS (16 UNITS)

W GIRARD AVE POPLAR ST



RETAIL

BUSINESS/ OFFICE


RESIDENTIAL LOFT UNITS (16 UNITS)

N BROAD ST N WATTS ST



CAR PARKING

N

N B

RO

AD S

T

N W

ATTS

ST


RENDERS

FRONT VIEWACROSS STREET


RENDERS

LOOKING NORTHWARD ONN BROAD ST


3 D M A S S I N G M O D E L

N BROAD ST

POPLAR ST

W GIRARD AVE

CAMBRIDGE ST

N WATTS ST


S U STA I N A B I L I T Y Q U E ST I O N N A I R E

Civic Design Review, Philadelphia Sustainability Questionnaire

Categories Benchmark

Meets or Exceeds the Benchmark (yes or no)?

If yes, please describe how or reference the applicable document in the CDR

submission.

Location and Transportation

Access to Quality Transit

Locate a functional entry of the project within a ¼-mile (400-meter) walking distance of existing or planned bus, streetcar, or rideshare stops, bus rapid transit stops, light or heavy rail stations.

Reduced Parking Footprint

All new parking areas to be located in the rear yard of the property or under the building, and unenclosed or uncovered parking areas are 40% or less of the site area.

Green Vehicles

Designate 5% of all parking spaces used by the project as preferred parking for green vehicles or car share vehicles. Clearly identify and enforce for sole use by car share or green vehicles, which include plug-in electric vehicles and alternative fuel vehicles.

Bike Share StationIncorporate a bike share station in coordination with and conformance to the standards of Philadelphia Bike Share.

Sustainable Sites

Pervious Site Surfaces

Provides vegetated and/or pervious open space that is 30% or greater of the site's Open Area, as defined by the zoning code. Vegetated and/or green roofs can be included in this calculation.

Rainwater Management

Conform to the stormwater requirements of the Philadelphia Water Department(PWD) and either: A)Develop a green street and donate it to PWD, designed and constructed in accordance with the PWD Green Streets Design Manual, OR B) Manage additional runoff from adjacent streets on the development site, designed and constructed in accordance with specifications the PWD Stormwater Management Regulations

Heat Island Reduction (excluding roofs)

Reduce the heat island effect through either of the following strategies for 50% or more of all on-site hardscapes: A) Hardscapes that have a high reflectance, an SRI>29. B) Shading by trees, structures, or solar panels.

Philadelphia City Planning Commission

Yes.The project is a block from Girard, on N. Broad Street. There are multiple bus, trolley and subway lines within easy walking distance.

Not Applicable.

Not Applicable.Though a parking space for van is designated.

Yes.Entry of building parking is located on the rear side (N Watts St side)

Yes.Green roof and street planters are designated in drawing

Not applicable

Not applicable

Civic Design Review, Philadelphia Sustainability Questionnaire

Categories Benchmark

Meets or Exceeds the Benchmark (yes or no)?

If yes, please describe how or reference the applicable document in the CDR

submission.

Water Efficiency

Outdoor Water Use

Maintain on-site vegetation without irrigation. OR, reduce the watering requirements to at least 50% from the calculated baseline for the site's peak watering month.

Energy and Atmosphere

Energy Commissioning

Acquire a separate, independent commissioning service to insure that the energy related systems are installed, calibrated, and perform as intended.

Energy Performance

The project will reduce energy consumption by: Achieving 10% energy saving or more from an established baseline using ASHRAE standard 90.1-2010, OR by conforming to ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide for Commercial Buildings.

On-Site Renewable Energy

Produce renewable energy on-site that will provide at least 3% of the project's anticipated energy usage.

Innovation

InnovationAny other sustainable measures that could positively impact the public realm.

Philadelphia City Planning Commission

Green roof provided

Not Provided

Not Provided

Not Provided

Not Provided


C O M P L E T E ST R E E T S H A N D B O O K C H E C K L I ST

COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission

1

INSTRUCTIONS This Checklist is an implementation tool of the Philadelphia Complete Streets Handbook (the “Handbook”) and enables City engineers and planners to review projects for their compliance with the Handbook’s policies. The handbook provides design guidance and does not supersede or replace language, standards or policies established in the City Code, City Plan or Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).

This checklist is used to document how project applicants considered and accommodated the needs of all users of city streets during the planning and/or design of projects affecting the public right-‐of-‐way. Departmental reviewers will use this checklist to confirm that submitted designs incorporate complete streets considerations (see §11-‐901 of The Philadelphia Code). Applicants for projects that require Civic Design Review or Plan of Development Review shall complete this checklist and attach it to plans submitted to the Philadelphia City Planning Commission for review.

The Handbook can be accessed at http://philadelphiastreets.com/complete-‐streets.aspx.


2

INSTRUCTIONS (continued) APPLICANTS ARE ADVISED TO NOTE:

§ This checklist is designed to be filled out electronically. Text fields will expand automatically as you type.

§ This checklist is estimated to take 60–90 minutes to complete for applicants familiar with the Handbook.

§ Answering “No” or “Not Applicable” (N/A) to questions in this checklist does not result in an automatic denial ofapproval. Applicants shall provide adequate explanation and comments to justify any such responses in the spaceprovided at the end the checklist.

§ All plans submitted for review must clearly dimension the widths of the Furnishing, Walking, and Building Zones (asdefined in Section 1 of the Handbook). “High Priority” Complete Streets treatments (identified in Table 1 andsubsequent sections of the Handbook) should be identified and dimensioned on plans.

§ All plans submitted for review must clearly identify and site all street furniture, including but not limited to busshelters, street signs and hydrants.

§ Any project that calls for the development and installation of medians, bio-‐swales and other such features in theright-‐of-‐way may require a maintenance agreement with the Streets Department.

§ The coordination of all changes to the placement of street furniture (including but not limited to bus shelters,street signs and hydrants) is the responsibility of the developer throughout all phases of the project, from planningand design to construction management.

§ ADA curb-‐ramp designs must be submitted to the City for review

§ Any project that significantly changes the curb line may require a City Plan Action. The City Plan Action Applicationis available at http://philadelphiastreets.com/pds/City_Plan_Applicatio.pdf. An application to the StreetsDepartment for a City Plan Action is required when a project plan proposes the:

o Placing of a new street;o Removal of an existing street;o Changes to roadway grades, curb lines, or widths; oro Placing or striking a city utility right-‐of-‐way.


3

GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION 1. PROJECT NAME 2. DATE

3. APPLICANT NAME

4. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION

5. PROJECT AREA: list precise street limits and scope

6. OWNER NAME

7. OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION

8. ENGINEER / ARCHITECT NAME

9. ENGINEER / ARCHITECT CONTACT INFORMATION

10. 10. STREETS: List the streets associated with the project. Complete Street Types can be found at www.phila.gov/mapunder the “Transportation and Utilities” field. Complete Street Types are also identified in Section 3 of the Handbook.STREET FROM TO COMPLETE STREET TYPE

11. Does the Existing Conditions site survey clearly identify the following existing conditions?

a. Parking and loading regulations in curb lanes adjacent to the site YES NO

b. Street Furniture such as bus shelters, honor boxes, etc. YES NO N/A

c. Street Direction YES NO

d. Curb Cuts YES NO N/A

e. Utilities, including tree grates, vault covers, manholes, junctionboxes, signs, lights, poles, etc.

YES NO

f. Building Extensions into the sidewalk, such as stairs and stoops YES NO N/A

APPLICANT: General Project Information

Additional Explanation / Comments:

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: General Project Information

Reviewer Comments:

915-923 N BROAD ST AUG. 20. 2019

YAO-CHANG HUANG

610.896.3649

Z REALTY LLC

267-303-3688

YAO-CHANG HUANG

610-896-3649

n broad stN BROAD STN WATTS ST

POPLAR ST W GIRARD ST

POPLAR ST W GIRARD ST

CIVIC/ CEREMONIAL STREETLOCAL

POPLAR ST N BROAD ST N WATTS ST CITY NEIGHBORHOOD STREETW GIRARD ST URBAN ARTERIALN WATTS STN BROAD ST

V

V

V

V

V

V

Project area is on N Broad Street and N Watts Street between W Girard Ave and Poplar Street. Lot Area is 16,000 SF


4

PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.3) 12. SIDEWALK: list Sidewalk widths for each street frontage. Required Sidewalk widths are listed in Section 4.3 of the

Handbook.STREET FRONTAGE TYPICAL SIDEWALK WIDTH

(BUILDING LINE TO CURB) Required / Existing / Proposed

CITY PLAN SIDEWALK WIDTH Existing / Proposed

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

13. WALKING ZONE: list Walking Zone widths for each street frontage. The Walking Zone is defined in Section 4.3 of theHandbook, including required widths.STREET FRONTAGE WALKING ZONE

Required / Existing / Proposed

/ /

/ /

/ /

/ /

14. VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS: list Vehicular Intrusions into the sidewalk. Examples include but are not limited to;driveways, lay-‐by lanes, etc. Driveways and lay-‐by lanes are addressed in sections 4.8.1 and 4.6.3, respectively, of theHandbook.

EXISTING VEHICULAR INTRUSIONSINTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT

PROPOSED VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT

N BROAD ST

N WATTS ST

20' 22' 22' 22' 22'

10' 10' 10' 10'10'

N BROAD ST

N WATTS ST

10' 19' 19'

5' 5' 5'

N WATTS ST20'CURB CUT

NONE




5

PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (continued) DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL

15. Does the design limit block lengths to 500 feet or less? YES NO N/A YES NO

16. When considering the overall design, does the design create apedestrian environment that provides safe and comfortable access forall pedestrians?

YES NO YES NO

APPLICANT: Pedestrian Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Pedestrian Component

Reviewer Comments:

V

V


6

BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.4) 17. BUILDING ZONE: list the MAXIMUM, existing and proposed Building Zone width on each street frontage. The Building

Zone is defined is as the area of the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the building face, wall, or fence marking theproperty line, or a lawn in lower density residential neighborhoods. The Building Zone is further defined in section4.4.1 of the Handbook.STREET FRONTAGE MAXIMUM BUILDING ZONE WIDTH

Existing / Proposed

/

/

/

/

18. FURNISHING ZONE: list the MINIMUM, recommended, existing, and proposed Furnishing Zone widths on each streetfrontage. The Furnishing Zone is further defined in section 4.4.2 of the Handbook.STREET FRONTAGE MINIMUM FURNISHING ZONE WIDTH

Recommended / Existing / Proposed

/ /

/ /

/ /

/ /

19. Identify proposed “high priority” building and furnishing zone design treatments that areincorporated into the design plan, where width permits (see Handbook Table 1). Are thefollowing treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan?

DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL

§ Bicycle Parking YES NO N/A YES NO § Lighting YES NO N/A YES NO § Benches YES NO N/A YES NO § Street Trees YES NO N/A YES NO § Street Furniture YES NO N/A YES NO

20. Does the design avoid tripping hazards? YES NO N/A YES NO

21. Does the design avoid pinch points? Pinch points are locations wherethe Walking Zone width is less than the required width identified initem 13, or requires an exception

YES NO N/A YES NO

N BROAD ST

N WATTS ST3' 3'

NO MIN NO MIN

N BROAD ST

N WATTS ST5'

3.5'

5' 5'

3.5' 3.5'

V

V

VV

VV

V




7

BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (continued)

APPLICANT: Building & Furnishing Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Building & Furnishing Component

Reviewer Comments:

22. Do street trees and/or plants comply with street installationrequirements (see sections 4.4.7 & 4.4.8)

YES NO N/A YES NO

23. Does the design maintain adequate visibility for all roadway users atintersections?

YES NO YES NO

24. When considering the overall design of the Building & FurnishingComponent, does the design enhance the pedestrian environment?

YES NO YES NO

V

V

V


8

BICYCLE COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.5) 25. List elements of the project that incorporate recommendations of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, located online at

http://phila2035.org/wp-‐content/uploads/2012/06/bikePedfinal2.pdf

26. List the existing and proposed number of bicycle parking spaces, on-‐ and off-‐street. Bicycle parking requirements areprovided in The Philadelphia Code, Section 14-‐804.BUILDING / ADDRESS REQUIRED

SPACES ON SIDEWALK OR STREET Existing / Proposed

OFF-‐STREET Existing / Proposed

/ /

/ /

/ /

/ /

27. Identify proposed “high priority” bicycle design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that areincorporated into the design plan, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority” elementsidentified and dimensioned on the plan?


§ Conventional Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO § Buffered Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO § Bicycle-‐Friendly Street YES NO N/A YES NO

28. Does the design provide bicycle connections to local bicycle, trail, andtransit networks?

YES NO YES NO

29. Does the design provide convenient bicycle connections to residences,work places, and other destinations?

YES NO YES NO

APPLICANT: Bicycle Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Bicycle Component

Reviewer Comments:

915-923 N BRAOD ST 24 0 0 28

V

V

V

VV




9

CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.6) DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL

30. Does the design limit conflict among transportation modes along thecurb?

YES NO YES NO

31. Does the design connect transit stops to the surrounding pedestriannetwork and destinations?

YES NO N/A YES NO

32. Does the design provide a buffer between the roadway and pedestriantraffic?

YES NO N/A YES NO

33. How does the proposed plan affect the accessibility, visibility, connectivity, and/or attractivenessof public transit?

YES NO

APPLICANT: Curbside Management Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Curbside Management Component

Reviewer Comments:

V

V

V

The plan does not directly affect the attractiveness of public transit, but will include planter boxes to beautify the sidewalk of pedestrians heading to the Broad Street line and bus lines.


10

VEHICLE / CARTWAY COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.7) 34. For each street frontage, identify existing and proposed lane widths and the design speed.

STREET FROM TO LANE WIDTHS Existing / Proposed

DESIGN SPEED

/

/

/

/


35. What is the maximum AASHTO design vehicle being accommodated bythe design?

YES NO

36. Will the project affect a historically certified street? An inventory ofhistoric streets(1) is maintained by the Philadelphia HistoricalCommission.

YES NO YES NO

37. Does the design plan incorporate roadway medians (a “high priority”vehicle / cartway design treatment for some street types)?

*Any proposed median may require a maintenance agreement with theStreets Department.

YES NO N/A YES NO

38. Does the design facilitate safe and accessible, deliveries to localindustries and businesses?

YES NO YES NO

39. Will the public right-‐of-‐way be used for loading and unloadingactivities?

YES NO YES NO

40. Does the design maintain emergency vehicle access? YES NO YES NO

41. Where new streets are being developed, does the design connect andextend the street grid?

YES NO N/A YES NO

42. Does the design support multiple alternative routes to and fromdestinations as well as within the site?

YES NO N/A YES NO

43. Overall, does the design balance vehicle mobility with the mobility andaccess of all other roadway users?

YES NO YES NO

APPLICANT: Vehicle / Cartway Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Vehicle / Cartway Component

Reviewer Comments:

(1) http://www.phila.gov/historical/PDF/Historic%20Street%20Paving%20District%20Inventory.pdf

N/A

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V




11

URBAN DESIGN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.8) DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL

44. Does the design incorporate windows, storefronts, and other activesuses facing the street?

YES NO N/A YES NO

45. Does the proposed project have a Philadelphia Water Department(PWD) Work Number? If so, please provide.

46. List the stormwater management and drainage features incorporatedinto the design of the Right of Way (see Section 4.8.4).

YES NO N/A YES NO

47. Does the design provide driveway access that safely managespedestrian / bicycle conflicts with vehicles (see Section 4.8.1)?

YES NO N/A YES NO

48. Does the design provide direct, safe, and accessible connectionsbetween transit stops and building access points and destinationswithin the site?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Urban Design Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Urban Design Component

Reviewer Comments:

V

V

V

V


12

INTERSECTIONS & CROSSINGS COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.9) 49. Identify Existing and Proposed Signal Cycle lengths

SIGNAL LOCATION EXISTING CYCLE LENGTH

PROPOSED CYCLE LENGTH


50. Does the design minimize the signal cycle length to reduce pedestrianwait time?

YES NO N/A YES NO

51. Does the design provide adequate clearance time for pedestrians tocross streets?

YES NO N/A YES NO

52. Does the design minimize pedestrian crossing distances by narrowingstreets or travel lanes, extending curbs, reducing curb radii, or usingmedians or refuge islands to break up long crossings?

* If yes, City Plan Action may be required.

YES NO N/A YES NO

53. Identify “High Priority” intersection and crossing design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) thatwill be incorporated into the design, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority” designtreatments identified and dimensioned on the plan?

YES NO

§ Marked Crosswalks YES NO N/A YES NO § Pedestrian Refuge Islands YES NO N/A YES NO § Signal Timing and Operation YES NO N/A YES NO § Bike Boxes YES NO N/A YES NO

54. Does the plan simplify complex intersections where possible? YES NO N/A YES NO

55. Does the design reduce vehicle speeds and increase visibility atintersections?

YES NO N/A YES NO

56. Overall, do intersection designs limit conflicts between modes andpromote pedestrian and bicycle safety?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Intersections & Crossings Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Intersections & Crossings Component

Reviewer Comments:

V

V

V

V

V

VV

V

V

V




13

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

APPLICANT


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW

Additional Reviewer Comments:



1%52$'67 - Philadelphian carlisle st cambridge st address zoning district overlay district scope of...

Documents

Transcript of 1%52$'67 - Philadelphian carlisle st cambridge st address zoning district overlay district scope of...