15017207 MAN4154M
57
15017207 MAN4154M by LISI HUANG FILE T IME SUBMIT T ED 10-DEC-2015 03:09PM SUBMISSION ID 50170792 WORD COUNT 5027 CHARACT ER COUNT 30705 15017207_MAN4154M.PDF (6.95M)
-
Upload
jabez-zinabu -
Category
Documents
-
view
66 -
download
0
Transcript of 15017207 MAN4154M
15017207 MAN4154Mby LISI HUANG
FILE
TIME SUBMITTED 10-DEC-2015 03:09PM
SUBMISSION ID 50170792
WORD COUNT 5027
CHARACTER COUNT 30705
15017207_MAN4154M.PDF (6.95M)
FINAL GRADE
80/0
15017207 MAN4154MGRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
InstructorGrade: 80
Please see the marking grid (attached) whichgives f ull details of the how you have met eachof the criteria.
The report should be written in third person.Conclusions could have been sharper.Overall, the report is comprehensive and to someextent accurately covers the area. Good attemptat crit ical, balanced and well- inf ormed evaluation.Throughout the text there is clarity of argumentand expression.
AC
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
PAGE 12
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
PAGE 15
PAGE 16
PAGE 17
PAGE 18
PAGE 19
PAGE 20
PAGE 21
PAGE 22
PAGE 23
PAGE 24
PAGE 25
PAGE 26
PAGE 27
PAGE 28
PAGE 29
PAGE 30
PAGE 31
PAGE 32
PAGE 33
PAGE 34
PAGE 35
PAGE 36
PAGE 37
PAGE 38
PAGE 39
PAGE 40
PAGE 41
PAGE 42
PAGE 43
PAGE 44
PAGE 45
PAGE 46
PAGE 47
RUBRIC: SOM MBA/MSC LEVEL 7 RUBRIC
THEORY
20-34 SIGNIFICANTFAILURE
35-39 MARGINALFAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100OUTSTANDING
CONTENT
20-34 SIGNIFICANTFAILURE
35-39 MARGINALFAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100OUTSTANDING
SCHOLARSHIP
70-84Excellent
Understanding theory and practice
Failure to demonstrate systematic understanding of topic/area and its relevance topractice
Failure to demonstrate systematic understanding of topic/area and its relevance topractice
Demonstrates (basic/satisf actory) understanding of topic/area and its relevanceto practice, in a coherent manner.
Demonstrates (basic/satisf actory) understanding of topic/area and its relevanceto practice, in a coherent manner.
Good understanding of topic/area and its relevance to practice consistentlydemonstrated in a logical, coherent manner.
Excellent co-ordinated, grounded and reasoned understanding of the topic and itsrelevance to practice.
Excellent co-ordinated, grounded and reasoned understanding of the topic and itsrelevance to practice.
70-84Excellent
Content/Theory/Models/Framework
Inaccurate/inappropriate content/theory/models/f rameworks and techniques.
Inaccurate/inappropriate content/theory/models/f rameworks and techniques.
Appropriate selection of content/theory/models/f rameworks and techniques butsome aspects may be missing.
Appropriate selection of content/theory/models/f rameworks and techniques butsome aspects may be missing.
Insightf ul and appropriate selection of content/theory/models/f rameworks andtechniques.
Innovation selection and use of content/theory/modules/f rameworks andtechniques.
Innovation selection and use of content/theory/modules/f rameworks andtechniques.
70-84Excellent
20-34 SIGNIFICANTFAILURE
35-39 MARGINALFAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100OUTSTANDING
EVALUATION
20-34 SIGNIFICANTFAILURE
35-39 MARGINALFAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100OUTSTANDING
COMPLEXITY
20-34 SIGNIFICANTFAILURE
35-39 MARGINAL
Reading, Scholarship
Litt le evidence of reading around the subject ore use of theory/literature tosupport the narrative/discussion.
Litt le evidence of reading around the subject ore use of theory/literature tosupport the narrative/discussion.
Limited but relevant reading around the subject. Basic/satisf actory use of theoryand literature to support narrative/discussion.
Limited but relevant reading around the subject. Basic/satisf actory use of theoryand literature to support narrative/discussion.
Good ability to crit ically appraise relevant theory and literature f rom variety ofsources, developing own ideas in the process.
Excellent/outstanding use of wide range of relevant sources of theories andliterature to justif y own ideas.
Excellent/outstanding use of wide range of relevant sources of theories andliterature to justif y own ideas.
70-84Excellent
Evaluation, Analysis
Failure to integrate and evaluate data/literature/current research
Failure to integrate and evaluate data/literature/current research
Some evaluation/analysis of data/literature/current research, reasonably integratedwith narrative.
Some evaluation/analysis of data/literature/current research, reasonably integratedwith narrative.
Good clear evidence of evaluation/analysis of data/literature/current research,integrated well with narrative.
Rigorous evaluation/analysis, comprehensively integrated with the narrative.
Rigorous evaluation/analysis, comprehensively integrated with the narrative.
70-84Excellent
Crit ical thought/ Complexity
Failure to apply crit ical thought to evidence and/ore analysis of data/theory to dealwith complex issues.
Failure to apply crit ical thought to evidence and/ore analysis of data/theory to deal
FAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100OUTSTANDING
CONCLUSIONS
20-34 SIGNIFICANTFAILURE
35-39 MARGINALFAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100OUTSTANDING
WRITTEN EXP
20-34 SIGNIFICANTFAILURE
35-39 MARGINALFAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59
with complex issues.
Basic/satisf actory attempt at crit ically reviewing evidence and/or analysis ofdata/theory within context.
Basic/satisf actory attempt at crit ically reviewing evidence and/or analysis ofdata/theory within context.
Good crit ical review of evidence and/or analysis of data/theory and its application.
Excellent/outstanding use of crit ical analysis and its use to support thedevelopment of written argument and development and original insights.
Excellent/outstanding use of crit ical analysis and its use to support thedevelopment of written argument and development and original insights.
70-84Excellent
Conclusions/Originality
Unsubstantiated conclusions based on anecdotes and generalisations. Generalabsence of originality
Unsubstantiated conclusions based on anecdotes and generalisations. Generalabsence of originality
Findings and conclusions grounded in theory/literature but limited. Some evidenceor originality developing.
Findings and conclusions grounded in theory/literature but limited. Some evidenceor originality developing.
Good summary of arguments based on theory/literature and its beginnings ofsynthesis. Clear evidence of originality.
Analytical and clear conclusions well grounded in theory and literature, showingdevelopment of original concepts.
Analytical and clear conclusions well grounded in theory and literature, showingdevelopment of original concepts.
70-84Excellent
Written Expression
Purpose and meaning unclear. Language, grammar and spelling poor.
Purpose and meaning unclear. Language, grammar and spelling poor.
Language mainly f luent. Some minor grammatical and spelling errors. Overallmeaning clear.
Language mainly f luent. Some minor grammatical and spelling errors. Overall
SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100OUTSTANDING
STRUCTURE
20-34 SIGNIFICANTFAILURE
35-39 MARGINALFAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100OUTSTANDING
REFERENCING
20-34 SIGNIFICANTFAILURE
35-39 MARGINALFAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100OUTSTANDING
meaning clear.
Thoughts and ideas clearly expressed. Grammar and spelling accurate andlanguage f luent. Good f low to narrative.
Clarity of expression excellent/outstanding. Accurate use of grammar and spellingwith f luent prof essional/academic writ ing style.
Clarity of expression excellent/outstanding. Accurate use of grammar and spellingwith f luent prof essional/academic writ ing style.
70-84Excellent
Structure/Presentation
Structure unclear, does not support narrative. Presentation not appropriate f oraudience.
Structure unclear, does not support narrative. Presentation not appropriate f oraudience.
Coherent structure, guides reader. Presentation appropriate f or audience intended.
Coherent structure, guides reader. Presentation appropriate f or audience intended.
Structure supports argument clearly. Presentation clear and appropriate.
Structure guides reader through argument. Presentation outstanding.
Structure guides reader through argument. Presentation outstanding.
70-84Excellent
Ref erencing
Ref erencing absent, unclear, irrelevant and/ore inaccurate.
Ref erencing absent, unclear, irrelevant and/ore inaccurate.
Some inconsistencies and inaccuracies in ref erencing using Harvard System.
Some inconsistencies and inaccuracies in ref erencing using Harvard System.
Ref erencing accurate using the Harvard System. Generally relevant/appropriate.
Ref erencing clear, entirely relevant and accurate using the Harvard System.
Ref erencing clear, entirely relevant and accurate using the Harvard System.
PRESENTATION
20-34 SIGNIFICANTFAILURE
35-39 MARGINALFAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100OUTSTANDING
GROUP WORK
20-34 SIGNIFICANTFAILURE
35-39 MARGINALFAILURE
40-49 BASIC
50-59SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100OUTSTANDING
LENGTH
20-34 SIGNIFICANTFAILURE
35-39 MARGINALFAILURE
Oral Presentation ONLY
Unsatisf actory speed of delivery and audibility. Failure to stimulate interest ordiscussion.
Unsatisf actory speed of delivery and audibility. Failure to stimulate interest ordiscussion.
Well-pace delivery but some f luctuations in speed and audibility. Some success npromoting discussion.
Well-pace delivery but some f luctuations in speed and audibility. Some success npromoting discussion.
Well-paced, clear and conf ident delivery. Good promotion of discussion and itsmanagement.
Excellent clarity, pace and conf ident delivery. Excellent/outstanding promotion,management and closure of discussion.
Excellent clarity, pace and conf ident delivery. Excellent/outstanding promotion,management and closure of discussion.
70-84Excellent
Group Work/Self Direction
Failure to engage in organisation of work or make meaningf ul contribution togroup activity.
Failure to engage in organisation of work or make meaningf ul contribution togroup activity.
Basic/satisf actory engagement with task. Limited contribution made to groupactivity.
Basic/satisf actory engagement with task. Limited contribution made to groupactivity.
Good engagement with task and participation in group activity.
Excellent/outstanding organisation of personal task and group activity.
Excellent/outstanding organisation of personal task and group activity.
70-84Excellent
This coursework has been penalized because it is signif icantly under or overlength.
40-49 BASIC
50-59SATISFACTORY
60-69 GOOD
70-84 EXCELLENT
85-100OUTSTANDING
