1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1)....

28
COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF JUWAII AT MANOA Department of Botany Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Clifford W. Smith, Unit Director Associate Professor of Botany Technical Report 1/44 Avifauna of Kohala Mountain, Hawai'i Charles van Riper 111 February 1982 UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Contract No. CX 8000 7 0009 Contribution Number CPSU/UH

Transcript of 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1)....

Page 1: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT

UNIVERSITY OF JUWAII AT MANOA

Department of Botany

Honolulu, Hawaii 96822

Clifford W. Smith, Unit Director Associate Professor of Botany

Technical Report 1/44

Avifauna of Kohala Mountain, Hawai'i

Charles van Riper 111

February 1982

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Contract No. CX 8000 7 0009

Contribution Number CPSU/UH

Page 2: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

ABSTRACT

Censuses were conducted f rom 1970-1972 i n t h e Kohala Mounta in F o r e s t ,

Hawai 'i . N a t i v e p a s s e r i nes were t h e most commonly encountered h i r d s , w i t h

t h e n e c t a r g u i l d o f t h e Drepan id idae h a v i n g t h e g r e a t e s t numbers o f

reco rded i n d i v i d u a l s and b e i n g t h e most c o n s i s t e n t l y d e t e c t e d b i r d s . A

number o f spec ies , known t o have o c c u r r e d h i s t o r i c a l l y i n t h e f o r e s t , were

n o t found d u r i n g t h e s tudy ; however, f o u r endangered spec ies ( k o l o a , ' i o ,

Hawai i Creeper, nuku-pu ' u ) were reco rded d u r i n g coun t p e r i o d s . The

nuku-pu 'u has n o t been r e p o r t e d p r e v i o u s l y f r o m t h e i s l a n d o f Hawai ' i .

Spec ies c o m p o s i t i o n was c o n s t a n t i n t h e f o r e s t t h r o u g h o u t t h e y e a r .

However, t h e n e c t a r i v o r o u s spec ies i n t h e p r i n c i p a l s t u d y a rea d i d undergo

s i g n i f i c a n t changes i n numbers ove r t h e annual c y c l e . The number o f

n e c t a r i vorous b i r d s reco rded /hour o f census i ng d i d n o t change

s i g n i f i c a n t l y i n t h e p r i n c i p a l s tudy s i t e ove r t h e annual c y c l e . B r e e d i n g

p e r i o d s , as de te rm ined f rom a c t i v e n e s t s and census da ta , were found t o

l e n g t h e n somewhat t h e p r e s e n t l y known b r e e d i n g seasons o f some spec ies i n

o t h e r areas o f Hawai i .

Page 3: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

TABLE OF CONTENTS

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ABSTRACT

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTRODUCTION

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . METHODS

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . Study area

I 1 . Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

. . . . . . . . . . . . I Species d i s t r i b u t i o n and abundance

. . . . . . . . . . . . . I 1 U n i f o r m i t y o f spec ies c o m p o s i t i o n

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 1 1 . Species abundance

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I V . B r e e d i n g seasons

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LITERATURE CITED

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . APPENDIX

Page 4: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

F i gu r e s

F ig . 1.

F i g . 2.

F ig . 3.

T a b l e 1.

Tab le 2.

T a b l e 3.

Tab le 4.

L i s t o f

Map o f a p o r t i o n o f Kohala Mountain, H a w a i ' i , showing t h e

s t u d y area ( d a r k hash ing ) and l o c a t i o n s where compara t i ve

censuses were conducted. E l e v a t i o n c o n t o u r s a r e i n meters,

doub le dashed l i n e s a r e j e e p roads, and l i g h t hash ing denotes

p a s t u r e l a n d a d j a c e n t t o t h e f o r e s t .

Average mon th l y numbers o f n e c t a r i v o r o u s b i r d s reco rded d u r i n g

counts f r o m 1970-1972 i n t h e Kohala Mounta in F o r e s t , H a w a i ' i .

Numbers a t t h e t o p i n pa ren theses a r e sample s i z e s .

Average m o n t h l y numbers o f t h e common n o n - n e c t a r i v o r o u s

p a s s e r i n e s p e c i e s reco rded d u r i n g coun ts f rom 1970-1972 i n t h e

Kohala Moun ta in F o r e s t , Hawai 'i. Numbers a t t h e t o p i n

parentheses a r e sample s i zes .

L i s t o f Tab les

B i r d s reco rded i n t h e Kohala Mounta in F o r e s t d u r i n q 47 count

p e r i o d s f r o m 1970-1972.

Mon th l y re1 a t i ve abundance o f b i r d spec ies as de te rm ined f rom 47

count p e r i o d s conducted f r o m 1970-1972 i n t h e Kohala Moun ta in

F o r e s t , Hawai ' i . Number o f a c t i v e n e s t s found f rom 1969-1972 on Koha la Mounta in ,

Hawai 'i.

Mean pe rcen tage o f j u v e n i l e b i r d s reco rded d u r i n q 1,115 hours of

census ing f rom 1970-1972 i n t h e Kohala Mounta in F o r e s t ,

Hawai ' i .

iii

Page 5: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

AVIFAUNA OF KOHALA MOUNTAIN, HAWA I ' I

The Kohala Mountain Fores t remains one o f t h e l e a s t known areas i n

t h e Hawaiian arch ipe lago. A wide v a r i e t y o f av ian spec ies were found

t h e r e d u r i n g t h e l a t e 1800 's (Ro thsch i l d 1893-1900, Wi lson and Evans

1890-1899). Palmer ( i n Rothsch i 1 d 1893-1900: 58) c o l l e c t e d one o f t h e few

specimens o f t h e 'u la - 'a i -hawane (Ci r i d o p s anna) and Perk ins (1901 )

r epo r t ed t h i s f o r e s t t o be one o f t h e l a s t s t rongho lds o f t he ' o ' u

( P s i t t i r o s t r a p s i t t a c e a ) on Hawai 'i. Since 1900 t h e r e has been l i t t l e

o r n i t h o l o g i c a l work done i n t h i s r eg ion ; P r a t t (1967) recorded 5 n a t i ve

b i r d species i n t h e southernmost p a r t o f t h e f o r e s t , hu t Donaghho (1971)

f a i l e d t o f i n d any n a t i v e b i r d s i n an e x p e d i t i o n a long t h e no r t he rn s lope

o f t h e mountain. Berger (1975) and van R iper (1973, 1974, 1976, 1978a)

r epo r t ed on open-hab i ta t b i r d s , most o f which were i n t r oduced species.

Because so l i t t l e s u i t a b l e h a b i t a t remains i n t h e i s l a n d s f o r

H a w a i ' i ' s endemic b i r d s , i t i s impe ra t i ve t o document ex tan t f o r e s t areas

which con ta i n th rea tened o r endangered species. From 1969-1972 I

conducted censuses and recorded t h e b reed ing behav io r o f b i rds i n Kohal a

Mountain Fores t , a t t emp t i ng t o : ( 1 ) d e f i n e compositon o f t he present

av i fauna ; ( 2 ) measure u n i f o r m i t y o f species composi t ion throuqhout t h e

f o r e s t ; ( 3 ) q u a n t i f y r e l a t i v e p o p u l a t i o n numbers o f each species; and ( 4 )

d e l i m i t aspects o f t h e breeding seasons.

METHODS

Study a r e a . The Kohala Mountain Fores t i s a mesic ecosystem w i t h a mixed

canopy s f ' o h i ' a (Met ros ideros c o l l i n a ) and 'o lapa (Chei rodendron

Page 6: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

t r i g y n u m ) t r e e s , u n d e r l a i n by t r e e fe rns ( C i b o t i u m spp.) and o t h e r

subcanopy t r e e spec ies o f wh ich Pe lea ssp. a r e t h e most common. The

v e g e t a t i o n o f t h i s area i s most s i m i l a r t o t h a t o f Eas t and West Maui,

b e i n g d i f f e r e n t f rom any o t h e r f o r e s t on t h e i s l a n d o f H a w a i ' i (Rock

1913). The p a u c i t y o f f i e l d work i n t h i s area has been l a r q e l y due t o t h e

rugged t e r r a i n . The f o r e s t i s bounded on 2 s i d e s by t h e p r e c i p i t o u s

canyons o f Honokane on t h e west and Waip io Val l e y on t h e e a s t , and by

sheer sea c l i f f s t o t h e n o r t h . On ly l i m i t e d access i s a v a i l a b l e f rom t h e

south t h r o u g h p r i v a t e ranch lands.

The p r i n c i p a l s t u d y area was a 0.25 kin2 q u a d r a t a t 1100 m e l e v a t i o n

between Puu Lae lae and Kohakohau Gulch (F ig . 1). Comparat ive census

l o c a t i o n s were t h e Kehena D i t c h T r a i l , Eke, and Kawainui Stream area. I n

p a s t u r e areas s u r r o u n d i n g t h e f o r e s t , numerous i n c i d e n t a l s i g h t i ngs were

noted.

Techniques.--Breeding o b s e r v a t i o n s were made t h r o u g h o u t t h e 3 y e a r s o f t h e

s tudy. D u r i n g 1971 and 1972, 222 hours were spen t census ing d u r i n g 47

d a i l y - c o u n t p e r i o d s . I made most o b s e r v a t i o n s d u r i nq t h e peak b r e e d i n g

season (Februa ry t o May); however, censuses were a l s o under taken i n an

e a r l y , l a t e , and a nonbreed ing p e r i o d (January, J u l y , and November,

r e s p e c t i v e l y ) . S t r i p t r a n s e c t c o u n t s were conducted (Emlen 1971),

however, u n l i k e Emlen 's t e c h n i q u e t h e p e r p e n d i c u l a r d i s t a n c e o f t h e b i r d

from t h e o b s e r v e r ' s p a t h o f t r a v e l was n o t recorded.

A t o t a l o f 38 d a i l y coun ts was made i n t h e p r i n c i p a l s t u d y a rea i n

wh ich 178 h were spent censusing. The c o u n t s were f r o m 07:OO t h r o u g h

12:OO and conducted a t a s low u n i n t e r r u p t e d pace. Count p e r i o d s averaged

4.7 hours, b u t were o f unequal l e n g t h because o f v a r i a b l e wea the r

c o n d i t i o n s . A1 1 b i r d s were recorded as e i t h e r an a u r a l o r v i s u a l

Page 7: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

d e t e c t i o n , and age and sex were no ted whenever p o s s i b l e .

m i n i m i z e doub le r e g i s t r a t i o n s t h e t ime , l o c a t i o n and d i r e c t

were recorded. No "squeak ing" o r o t h e r sounds were used t o

I n o r d e r t o

i o n o f f l i g h t

1 u r e b i rds .

On a l t e r n a t e months d u r i n g t h e peak b r e e d i n g season, compara t i ve

c o u n t s were conducted i n h a b i t a t o f t h e Koha la Mounta in F o r e s t wh ich was

s i m i l a r t o t h a t o f t h e p r i n c i p a l s tudy area. A t o t a l o f 44 hours was

spen t d u r i n g 9 days o f compara t i ve census ing, 3 each a t t h e Kehena D i t c h ,

Eke, and Kawainui Stream. These coun ts were conducted on t h e day

f o l l o w i n g a census i n t h e p r i n c i p a l s t u d y area, under s i m i l a r weather

c o n d i t i o n s , and d u r i n g t h e same t i m e p e r i o d as t h e p r e v i o u s d a y ' s census.

The numbers o f each spec ies encountered p e r hour o f census ing were

used t o d e s c r i b e abundance l e v e l s (Ro tenber ry and Wiens 1974). These d a t a

were t h e n used t o d e f i n e :

r e l a t i v e abundance o f spec ies i = Ni/A

where N i = t o t a l number o f i n d i v i d u a l s o f t h e i t h s p e c i e s reco rded and A =

t o t a l number o f t h e most abundant spec ies ; and

f requency o f spec ies i = S i l S t

where S i = number o f count p e r i o d s i n wh ich t h e i t h spec ies was observed

and S t = t o t a l number o f counts ; and

i n c i d e n c e o f s p e c i e s i = Nils{.

A l l s t a t i s t i c a l ana lyses were computed on a Bur roughs 6700 u s i n g SPSS

programs ( N i e e t a1 1975). Where d a t a were n o t n o r m a l l y d i s t r i b u t e d ,

t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s were used b e f o r e appl i c a t i o n o f s t a t i s t i c a l t e s t s . The

l e v e l o f s t a t i s t i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e was c o n s i d e r e d t o be 0.05.

Page 8: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Species d i s t r i b u t i o n and abundance.--A t o t a l o f 13 b i r d species was

recorded d u r i n g censuses i n t h e Kohala Mountain Fores t , w h i l e 16 o t h e r

species were noted du r i ng i n c i d e n t a l observa t ions on t he mountain. Na t i ve

species re dominated i n t h e f o r e s t area (Table I ) , w h i l e i n t r oduced

species were more common i n t he pas tu re l and and i n t r oduced f o r e s t s a t

1 ower e l eva t i ons .

Na t i ve species.--The n a t i v e r ap to r s p r e f e r r e d open pas tu re h a b i t a t t o

t h a t o f t h e closed-canopy f o r e s t . Numerous i n c i d e n t a l s i q h t i n g s o f t h e

' i o and pueo were made o u t s i d e o f t h e f o r e s t . The ' i o was most f r e q u e n t l y

observed soa r i ng over t h e deep v a l l e y s on t h e no r t he rn and no r t heas te rn

edges o f t h e f o r e s t w h i l e t h e pueo was most common over pas tu re lands.

Because o f re leases by t h e Hawai 'i D i v i s i o n o f F i s h and Game, t h e ko loa

has r e c e n t l y been re tu rned t o t h e Kohala Mountain Forest . The g rea tes t

concen t ra t i on o f ko loa a re p r e s e n t l y i n t h e Kahua Ranch ( t h e p r i n c i p a l

F i s h and Game re lease s i t e ) , s c a t t e r e d throughout t h e sma l l e r c a t t l e

wa te r i ng ho les up t o t h e b0undar.y o f t h e f o r e s t near t h e Kehena D i tch .

One p a i r was observed i n t he Hamakua D i t c h d u r i n g i n c i d e n t a l s i q h t i n q

pe r i ods th roughou t 1971, bu t no young were seen.

The most f r e q u e n t l y observed group o f n a t i ve b i r ds d u r i nq censusi nq

was t h e passer ines, o f which t h e endemic Drepanid idae were t h e most

common. The 'apapane and 'amakihi were found throughout most o f t h e

f o r e s t whereas t h e 'i ' i w i was much more 1 oca l i zed , be ing found o n l y where

ex tens i ve stands o f l a r g e r ' o h i ' a occurred. The endangered Hawaii Creeper

was observed most o f t e n i n t h e f o r e s t between Puu Eke and t h e Kehena D i t c h

t r a i l , be ing q u i t e r a r e t o absent i n o the r areas o f t h e f o r e s t . The

nuku-pu'u which h e r e t o f o r e has riot been repo r t ed from t h e i s l a n d o f

Page 9: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

e r c k e l i i ), I n d i a n Grey F ranco l i n (F ranco l i nus pond i c e r i anus).

Absent spec ies . - -No t i ceab ly absent f rom t h e f o r e s t were t h e Hawai ian

Thrush (Phaeorn i s obscurus; see a l s o van R i p e r and S c o t t 1979), and o t h e r

1 ess common endemic spec ies such as t h e 'akepa (Loxops c o c c i n e a ) ,

' a k i a p o l a ' a u and ' o ' u . None o f t h e n a t i v e spec ies wh ich h i s t o r i c a l l y

o c c u r r e d i n t h e f o r e s t , b u t a r e now b e l i e v e d t o he e x t i n c t , were observed.

A l though I d i d n o t f i n d ev idence o f b r e e d i n g s e a b i r d s , K e p l e r e t a1 (1979)

r e c e n t l y suggested t h a t c o l o n i e s o f Manx Shearwater ( P u f f i n u s p u f f i n u s

n e w e l l i ) may e x i s t i n t h e Kohala Mounta in Fo res t . The K a l i ji Phesant

(Lophura leucornel ana) w h i c h has r e c e n t l y undergone a g r e a t range expans ion

on t h e i s l a n d o f Hawai i ( P r a t t 1975) has a p p a r e n t l y n o t y e t reached t h e

Kohala Mounta in F o r e s t .

Uni f o r m i t y o f s p e c i e s compos i t i on . - - I n an e f f o r t t o de te rm ine i f b i r d

spec ies were un i fo r rna l l y d i s t r i b u t e d o v e r w idespread b u t s i m i l a r a reas i n

t h e Kohala Mounta in F o r e s t , compara t i ve coun ts were under taken. The

ana lyses, wh ich were conducted on t h e numbers o f s p e c i e s encoun te red

d u r i n g one d a y ' s census i n t h e p r i n c i p a l s tudy area versus t h e number o f

spec ies encountered t h e f o l l o w i n g day i n a compara t i ve l o c a t i o n , showed

t h a t i n a l l cases no s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e i n spec ies c o m p o s i t i o n e x i s t e d

between o u t l y i n g areas and t h e p r i n c i p a l s tudy s i t e (Eke: q2 = 3.54, d f =

8, P = .90; Kawainui Stream: X* = 1.35, d f = 6, P = .97; Kehena D i t c h

T r a i l : 'X2 = 1.75, d f = 6, P = .94). These r e s u l t s suggest t h a t b i r d

s p e c i e s c o m p o s i t i o n i s r e l a t i v e l y u n i f o r m ove r t h e e x t a n t Kohala Moun ta in

F o r e s t area.

Species abundance.--Overal l numbers o f most b i r d spec ies i n t h e

Kohala Moun ta in F o r e s t were h i g h e r t h a n comparable s t u d i e s r e p o r t e d f r o m

Mo loka i ( S c o t t e t . a l . 1977) and Oahu ( S h a l l e n b e r g e r 1978), b u t l ower than

Page 10: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

o t h e r f o r e s t areas on t he i s l a n d o f Hawai 'i (Conant 1981b, Sco t t pers.

comm.). The i n t e rmed ia te numbers o f b i r d s recorded d u r i n g t h i s study may

r e f l e c t t h e lowered c a r r y i n g capac i t y o f t h i s smal l remnant o f now n e a r l y

i s o l a t e d f o r e s t . I found t h a t t h e 'apapane was t h e most abundant b i r d i n

t h e Kohala Mountain Fores t , f o l l owed c l o s e l y by t h e Japanese White-eye and

then t h e 'amakih i (Table 1). Not on l y was t h e 'apapane t h e most abundant

b i r d over t h e annual c yc l e , b u t i t a1 so had t h e most months when i t had

t h e h i g h e s t r e l a t i v e abundance (Table 2). However, t h e 'amakihi was t h e

most c o n s i s t e n t l y encountered species d u r i n g count pe r i ods i n t he f o res t

(spec ies f requency = 0.98). The lower spec ies f requency o f t h e 'i ' i w i was

p r i m a r i l y a r e s u l t o f i t s absence d u r i n g t h e nonbreeding censuses.

However, even when present t h e ' i ' i w i ' s re1 a t i v e l y 1 ow spec ies i nc i dence

va lue i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e b i r d was never commonly encountered.

I analyzed data from a l l counts conducted w i t h i n t h e p r i n c i p a l s tudy

area and found t h a t numbers o f 'apapane, 'amaki h i , and 'i ' i w i changed

s i g n i f i c a n t l y over t h e annual c y c l e ( a n a l y s i s o f va r iance ; PL .05; F ig .

2). These t h r e e species a re a l l nec ta r i vo rous , and t h e i r movements i n and

out o f t h e s tudy area might w e l l be r e l a t e d t o changes i n l o c a l nec ta r

a v a i l a b i l i t y as Baldwin (1953) showed was t r u e f o r another ' o ' h i a f o r e s t

on Hawaii. O f t h e non-nectar ivorous spec ies which were encountered

f r e q u e n t l y enough t o determine i f popu la t i on movements occured, none

showed s i g n i f i c a n t changes i n t h e number o f b i r d s recorded/hour over t h e

annual c y c l e (Ana l ys i s o f Var iance; P .05; F i g . 3). These b i r d s tended

t o be e i t h e r i n s e c t i vorous ( ' e l e p a i o ) o r omni vorous (Red-bi 1 l e d L e i o t h r i x ,

Japanese Whi te-eye) .

B reed ing seasons.--On Kohala Mountain, I found t h a t t h e n a t i v e b i r d s

tended t o nes t e a r l i e r i n t h e yea r than d i d t h e i n t r oduced spec ies (Tab le

Page 11: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

3). The 'amaki h i showed a more c o n t r a c t e d b r e e d i n g p e r i o d t h a n has been

r e p o r t e d f o r t h e p o p u l a t i o n i n t h e d r y f o r e s t on Mauna Kea (Berge r 1972,

van R i p e r 1978b), b u t had a s i m i l a r b r e e d i n g p e r i o d t o t h e ' amak ih i f rom

t h e wet f o r e s t s o f Kauai (Edd inger 1970) and Hawai 'i (Ba ldw in 1953). The

'apapane and ' i ' i w i had b r e e d i n g p e r i o d s s i m i l a r t o those r e p o r t e d f rom

Kauai by Edd inger (1970). I found t h a t t h e ' e l e p a i o had a s l i g h t l y l o n g e r

b r e e d i n g season i n t h e Kohal a Mounta in F o r e s t t h a n Edd inger ( i n Be rge r

1972) found f o r t h e b i r d on Kauai, and Conant (1977) found on Oahu.

The b r e e d i n g seasons o f a1 1 n a t i v e spec ies c o i n c i d e d we1 1 w i t h

immature b i r d s observed d u r i n g censuses (Tab1 e 4). 'Apapane j u v e n i 1 es

were reco rded o v e r t h e l o n g e s t p e r i o d , b u t because i t i s n o t y e t known t h e

l e n g t h o f t i m e t h a t each of t h e s e spec ies r e t a i n t h e i r j u v e n i l e plumage,

t h e same b i r d s may have been observed ove r an ex tended t i m e p e r i o d .

The i n t r o d u c e d spec ies on Kohala Mounta in a l l e x h i b i t e d b r e e d i n g

seasons s i m i l a r t o t h e l i m i t s s e t f o r each b i r d by p r e v i o u s workers. The

Japanese White-eye b r e e d i n g season was w i t h i n t h e b r e e d i n g p e r i o d o f an

Oahu p o p u l a t i o n (Guest l 9 7 3 ) , b u t t h e R e d - b i l l e d L e i o t h r i x b r e e d i n g p e r i o d

was l a t e r i n t h e y e a r t h a n was g i v e n f o r t h i s b i r d by F i s h e r and B a l d w i n

(1947). The Common Mynah n e s t s t h a t I found were i n t h e e a r l i e r p a r t o f

t h e b r e e d i n g season which Edd inger (1967) o u t l i n e d f o r an Oahu

p o p u l a t i o n . A l l o f t h e House F i n c h n e s t s t h a t I f ound d u r i n q t h i s s t u d y

o c c u r r e d d u r i n g t h e same months t h a t o t h e r n e s t s have been r e p o r t e d f r o m

Hawai 'i (van R i p e r 1976) and f rom Oahu ( H i r a i 1975). B reed ing seasons f o r

t h e o t h e r i n t r o d u c e d b i r d s found on Kohala Mounta in have n o t y e t been

de te rm ined i n H a w a i ' i .

Page 12: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS

A n a l y s i s o f b r e e d i n g and census da ta f rom t h e Kohala Mounta in F o r e s t

show t h a t , w h i l e t h e p r e s e n t day a v i f a u n a i s n o t as d i v e r s e as h i s t o r i c a l

r e c o r d s i n d i c a t e i t once was, 9 n a t i v e spec ies s t i l l e x i s t on t h e

mountain. Four o f t h e spec ies ( ko loa , ' i o , Hawai i Creeper, nuku-pu ' u )

i d e n t i f i e d d u r i n g coun t p e r i o d s a r e c l a s s i f i e d by t h e U.S. F i s h and

W i l d l i f e S e r v i c e s as endangered (USDI 1966). Recent work on a number o f

endanqered spec ies i n Hawai i has i n d i c a t e d t h a t g e n e t i c f i t n e s s may be a

prob lem i n r a r e r s p e c i e s (Temple, pers. comm.; van R i p e r 1980; Walker,

1974). It i s t h e r e f o r e i m p e r a t i v e t h a t d i v e r s e qene p o o l s be p rese rved i n

o r d e r t o i n s u r e t h e g e n e t i c i n t e g r i t y o f t h e e x t a n t spec ies .

A l t h o u g h t h e f o r e s t i s much reduced f rom i t s o r i g i n a l s i z e , i t does

f i t a number o f c r i t e r i a Diamond and May (1976) deem e s s e n t i a l f o r a

n a t u r a l reserve. The f o r e s t i s n e a r l y c i r c u l a r i n shape, wh ich maximizes

t h e a r e a - t o - p e r i m e t e r r a t i o t h u s m i n i m i z i n g d i s p e r s a l d i s t a n c e s w i t h i n t h e

f o r e s t . A c i r c u l a r c o n f i g u r a t i o n a l s o a v o i d s a p e n n i n s u l a r e f f e c t i n

wh ich d i s p e r s a l r a t e t o o u t l y i n q p a r t s wou ld be so low as t o cause

numeorus l o c a l e x t i n c t i o n s t h e r e b y d i m i n i s h i n g t h e r e s e r v e ' s e f f e c t v e

area. Secondly, t h e Kohala Mounta in F o r e s t has numerous e a s i l y a c c e s s i b l e

s t e p p i n g s tones o f f o r e s t pa tches above Honokaa, wh ich l e a d t o t h e l a r g e

p r i s t i n e ' o h i ' a f o r e s t on t h e n o r t h e a s t e r n f l a n k o f Mauna Kea. Over t i m e ,

t h e s e f o r e s t pa tches wou ld enab le b i r d s t o e m i g r a t e i n t o t h e Kohala

Mounta in F o r e s t area. F i n a l l y , because o f H a w a i ' i ' s d i sha rmon ic fauna,

many f o r e s t a reas ( o f wh ich Kohala i s one) a r e we1 1 be low t h e c a r r y i n g

c a p a c i t i e s o f s i m i l a r s i z e d i s l a n d s o u t l i n e d by Diamond and May (1976) i n

t h e i r r e v i e w o f n a t u r a l reserves.

The Koha la Mounta in F o r e s t a rea wou ld t h e r e f o r e seem t o l e n d i t s e l f

Page 13: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

we1 1 t o t h e r e i n t r o d u c t i o n o f c e r t a i n spec ies wh ich have been e x t i r p a t e d

from t h i s reg ion . T r a n s l o c a t i o n s of a v i a n spec ies have been c a r r i e d o u t

q u i t e s u c c e s s f u l l y i n New Zealand ( M o r r i s 1977, Best 1980), b u t o t h e r t h a n

t h e Anser i f o rmes , l i t t l e a t t e n t i o n has been q i v e n t o t h i s t e c h n i q u e i n

Hawai i . The Hawai ian Thrush, wh ich was once q u i t e abundant ( P e r k i n s 1903)

b u t has s i n c e been l o s t f rom t h e Kohala Mounta in F o r e s t , wou ld seem t o be

a p r ime c a n d i d a t e f o r r e i n t r o d u c t i o n . The b i r d s t i l l e x i s t s i n h i q h

numbers on t h e sou th and s o u t h e a s t e r n p a r t o f t h e i s l a n d (van R i p e r and

S c o t t 1979), and c o u l d be e a s i l y c a p t u r e d and t r a n s p o r t e d t o t h e Koha

Mounta in Fo res t .

The Koha la Mounta in F o r e s t remains today one o f t h e more i naccess

1 a

i b l e

areas on t h e main Hawai ian I s l a n d s , and because o f t h i s can be p rese rved

i n i t s p r e s e n t c o n d i t i o n . B a r r i n g t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n o f new a v i a n

p r e d a t o r s , more success fu l c o m p e t i t o r s , o r an e p i z o o t i c , t h e area w i l l

remain a r e f u g e f o r Hawai ian b i r d s . T h e r e f o r e , s t e p s need t o be taken so

as t o ensure t h e p r e s e r v a t i o n o f t h i s sma l l , b u t i m p o r t a n t n a t i v e Hawai ian

r e f u g i um.

MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

A l though t h e Kohala Mounta in F o r e s t i s n o t N a t i o n a l Park S e r v i c e

l a n d , i t i s an i s l a n d o f v e g e t a t i o n and t h e problems a s s o c i a t e d w i t h

e x t i n c t i o n s a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e many i s l a n d s o f v e g e t a t i o n i n Hawai i

Volcanoes N a i t o n a l Park. It i s recommended t h a t :

1. N a t i o n a l Park S e r v i c e personne l keep a b r e a s t o f changes i n t h e

a v i f a u n a l compos i t i on o f Kohala Mounta in and see i f any o f t h e

changes would he a p p l i c a b l e t o changes t h a t occu r w i t h i n Hawai i

Page 14: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

Volcanoes Nat iona l Park.

2. I f a t r a n s p l a n t o f t h e Hawaiian Thrush ever does occur i n t o t h e

Kohala Mountain Fores t area from t h e Mauna Loa f o r e s t s , s c i e n t i s t

and Resource Management s t a f f a t Hawai i Volcanoes Nai t o n a l Park

should become i nvo l ved i n t h e e f f o r t .

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The f i e l d phase o f t h i s research was made p o s s i b l e by g ran t s from t h e

Frank M. Chapman Fund, Hawaii Audubon Soc ie ty , and I n t e r n a t i o n a l Counc i l

f o r B i r d Preserva t ion . The Hawa i ' i P repara to r~y Academy p rov i ded a base o f

ope ra t i ons f o r t h i s study, f o r which I am most g r a t e f u l . A Na t iona l Park

Se rv i ce Con t rac t No. C X 8000 7 0009 i n con junc t i on w i t h a Na t i ona l

Geographic Soc ie ty Grant and suppor t f rom Earthwatch and t h e Center For

F i e l d Research p rov i ded p a r t i a l support d u r i n g p repa ra t i on of t h e

manuscr ipt . M. Robinson typed t h e manuscr ip t , and I thank R. Orenste in ,

C. John Ralph, J. Michael Sco t t , and Sandra G. van R iper f o r t h e i r

p e r c e p t i v e comments on e a r l i e r d r a f t s o f t h i s paper.

Page 15: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

LITERATURE CITED

Baldwin, P. H. 1953. Annual c y c l e , env i ronment and e v o l u t i o n i n t h e

Hawai i a n honeycreepers, (Aves: Drepani i d a e ) . Uni v. Cal i f . Publ .

Banko, W. E. 1968. Rediscovery o f Maui Nukupuu, (Hernignathus l u c i d u s

a f f i n i s ) , and s i g h t i n g of Maui P a r r o t b i l l , (Pseudonestor

xan thophrys ) , Kipahul u Val l e y , Maui , Hawai i . Condor 70:265-266.

Berger, A. 3. 1972. Hawaiian b i r d l i f e . Univ. Press o f Hawai i , Honolu lu .

Berger, A. J. 1975. The Warb l ing S i l v e r b i l l , a new n e s t i n g b i r d i n

Hawai i . Pac. Sci . 29:51-54.

Best , H. A. 1980. Recent Kakapo research on Stewar t I s l a n d . W i l d l . Rev.

N.Z. W i l d l . Serv. 11:33-38.

Conant, S. 1977. The b reed ing b i o l o g y o f t h e Oahu ' E l e p a i o . Wilson

Conant, S. 1981a. Recent o b s e r v a t i o n s o f endangered b i r d s i n H a w a i i ' s

N a t i o n a l Parks. ' E l e p a i o 41:55-61.

Conant, S. 198 lb . Organi srns a1 ong an i s 1 and mountain t r a n s e c t : b i rds .

Pp. 97-105 - i n I s l a n d ecosystems. (Mul ler-Dombois, D., K. W. Br idges,

and H.L. Carson, eds.). Hutch inson Ross Publ. Co., S t roudsburd,

Pennsy lvan ia .

Diamond, J. M. and R. M. May. 1976. I s l a n d b iogeography and t h e des ign

o f n a t u r a l reserves. Pp. 163-186 - i n T h e o r e t i c a l eco logy p r i n c i p l e s

and a p p l i c a t i o n s . ( R . M. May, ed.). W. B. Saunders Co.,

Phi 1 ade l p h i a.

Donaghho. W. R. 1971. Kohala Mountains s c i e n t i f i c e x p e d i t i o n . ' E l e p a i o

Page 16: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

Eddinger , C. R. 1967. A s tudy o f t h e b r e e d i n g b e h a v i o r o f t h e mynah.

' E l e p a i o 28: 1-15.

Eddinger, C. R. 1970. A s tudy of t h e b r e e d i n g b i o l o g y o f f o u r spec ies o f

Hawai ian honeycreepers (Drepan id idae) . Ph.D. d iss . , l ln iv . Hawai i ,

Hono lu lu , Hawai i . Emlen, J. T. 1971. P o p u l a t i o n d e n s i t i e s o f b i r d s d e r i v e d f rom t r a n s e c t

counts . Auk 88:323-342.

F i s h e r , H. I. and P. H. Baldwin. 1947. Notes of t h e R e d - b i l l e d L e i o t h r i x

i n Hawai i . Pac. Sci . 1:45-51.

Guest, S. J. 1973. A r e p r o d u c t i v e b i o l o g y and n a t u r a l h i s t o r y o f t h e

Japanese White-eye (Zos te rops j a p o n i c a j a p o n i c a ) i n urban Oahu.

Unpubl. M.S. t h e s i s , Univ. Hawai i , Honolulu.

Hi r a i , L. T. 1975. The n e s t i n g b i o l o g y o f t h e House F inch i n Honolu lu ,

Hawai i . Western B i r d s 6:33-44.

Kep le r , C. B., J . J e f f e r y and J. M. Sco t t . 1979. P o s s i b l e b reed ing

c o l o n i e s o f Manx Shearwater on t h e i s l a n d o f Hawai i . ' E l e p a i o

39~115-116.

M o r r i s , R. B. 1977. B lack Robin t r a n s f e r s . W i l d l . Rev. N. Z. W i l d l .

Serv. 8:44-48.

Nie, N. H.. C. H. H u l l , J. G. Jenk ins , K. S te inb renner , and D. H. Bent.

1975. SPSS: s t a t i s t i c a l package f o r t h e s o c i a l sc iences.

McGraw-Hil l Co., New York.

Perk ins , R. C. L. 1901. An i n t r o d u c t i o n t o t h e s t u d y o f t h e

Drepanid idae, a f a m i l y o f b i r d s p e c u l i a r t o t h e Hawai ian I s l a n d s .

I b i s 1901 :562-585.

Page 17: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

Perk ins , R. C. L. 1903. V e r t e b r a t a (Aves). Pp. 368-465 - i n Fauna

Hawai iens is , v o l . 1, p a r t 4 (D. Sharp, ed.) The Univ. Press,

Cambridge, England.

P r a t t , T. K. 1967. F i e l d no tes f rom Thane P r a t t , Kamuela, Hawai i , pos t

marked A p r i 1 10, 1967. ' E l e p a i o 27:112-113.

P r a t t , T. K. 1975. The K a l i j Phesant on Hawai i . ' E l e p a i o 36:66-67.

Rock, J. F. 1913. The ind igenous t r e e s o f t h e Hawai ian I s l a n d s . Publ.

under pat ronage, Honolu lu , Hawaii . R o t h s c h i l d, W. 1893-1900. The a v i fauna o f Laysan and t h e n e i ghbour ing

i s l a n d s . R. H. P o r t e r , London, England.

Ro t tenber ry , J. T. and J. A. Wiens. 1976. A method f o r e s t i m a t i n q

spec ies d i s p e r s i o n f rom t r a n s e c t data . h e r . M i d l . Natur. 95:64-78.

S c o t t , J. M., D. H. Woodside and T. L. C. Casey. 1977. Observat ions o f

b i r d s i n t h e Molokai Fo res t Reserve, J u l y 1975. ' E l e p a i o 38:25-27.

Sha l lenberger , R. J. 1978. A v i f a u n a l survey i n t h e c e n t r a l Koolau Ranqe,

Oahu. Ahuimanu Produc t ions , K a i l u a , Hawai i .

U.S. Department o f t h e I n t e r i o r . 1966. Rare and endangered f i s h and

w i l d l i f e o f t h e U n i t e d Sta tes . Bureau o f Spor t F i s h e r i e s and

Wi ld1 i f e , Research Publ i c a t i o n 34. Washington, D. C.

van R ipe r , C., 111. 1973. I s l a n d o f Hawaii l a n d b i r d d i s t r i b u t i o n and

abundance. ' E l e p a i o 34: l -3.

van R i p e r , C., 111, 1974, Unusual uses o f R i c e b i r d n e s t s i n Hawaii .

' E l e p a i o 35:5.

van R ipe r , C., 111. 1976. Aspects o f House F inch b reed ing b i o l o g y i n

Hawai i . Condor 78: 224-229,

van R ipe r , C., I 1 I. l978a. D iscovery o f t h e Ye1 1 ow- f ron ted Canary on

Mauna Kea, Hawai i . ' E l e p a i o 38:99-100.

Page 18: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

van R ipe r , C., 111. 1978b. The b r e e d i n g e c o l o g y o f t h e Amakihi (Loxops

v i r e n s ) and Pal i l a ( P s i t t i r o s t r a b a i 1 l e u i ) on Mauna Kea, Hawai i .

Ph.D. d iss . , Univ. Hawai i , Hono lu lu , Hawai i .

van R i p e r , C., 111. 1980. Observat ions on t h e b r e e d i n g o f t h e P a l i l a

P s i t t i r o s t r a b a i 1 l e u i o f Hawaii . I b i s 122:462-475.

van R ipe r , C., I 1 1 and J. M. Sco t t . 1979. Observa t i ons on d i s t r i b u t i o n ,

d i e t , and b r e e d i n g o f t h e Hawai ian Thrush. Condor 81:65-71.

Walker, R. L. 1974. 1972 r e p o r t o f Nene r e s t o r a t i o n program. ' E l e p a i o

W i 1 son, S. B. and A. H. Evans. 1890-1899. Aves Hawai i e n s e s : The b i r d s

o f t h e Sandwich I s l a n d s . R. H. P o r t e r , London, England.

Page 19: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

TABLE 1 B i r d s recorded i n t he Kohala Mountain Fores t d u r i n g 47 count pe r i ods f rom 1970-1972

Speci es

No. Counts i n To ta l B i r d s Recorded which Species was R e l a t i v e Spec i es Spec i es

Observed No. Aura l No. V isua l Abundance Frequency Inc idence

ko l oa 2 (Anas wyvi 11 i ana )

' i 0 2 (Buteo s o l i t a r i u s )

pueo 2 (As io flammeus)

Red-bi 1 l e d L e i o t h r i x * 34 ( L e i o t h r i x l u t e a )

el od i ous Laughing Thrush* 1 (Gar ru lax canorus)

e l e p a i o (Chasiempis sandwichens is)

Japanese White-eve* 42 ( ~ o s t e r o ~ s j apon i cus )

House Finch* 6 (Carpodacus mexicanus)

'arnaki h i 46 (Loxops v i r e n s )

~ a m r e e p e r 7 (Loxops macula ta)

n u K i 7 T u ( ~ e r n i gnathus l u c i d u s )

' apapane 45 (Himat ione sanguinea)

' i ' i w i 33 ( V e s t i a r i a cocc inea)

* Denotes i n t r oduced species

Page 20: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

TABLE 2

Monthly r e l a t i v e abundance o f b i r d spec ies as determined from 47 count pe r i ods conducted f rom 1970-1972 i n t h e Kohala Mountain Fores t , Hawai 'i

Month ( t o t a l census hours)

Species January February March A p r i l May J u l y November ( t o t a l counted) (1 72.5) (150.5) (375.5) (79.0) (21 5.0) (101.0) (21 .O)

' e l e p a i o .19 (332) (44)

Red -b i l l ed L e i o t h r i x .06 (214) (14)

Japanese White-eye .37 (842) (85)

( )* = t o t a l b i r d s counted t h a t month

Page 21: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

TABLE 3

Number o f a c t i v e n e s t s found f rom 1969-1972 on Kohal a Mountain , Hawai ' i .*

MONTHS SPECIES / Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun J u l Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

' amak ih i 4 10 14 11 8 3

- - - - -

'apapane 1 3 4 2 -

'i ' i w i 2 5 4 1

' e l epa i o 1 1 2 6 4 3 1

Red-b i l l e d L e i o t h r i x 1 3 3 1

Japanese Whi t e - e y e 1 3 2 1 1

R i c e b i r d 1 1 1 1 1 1

Common Mynah 2 4 3 -

Northe rn C a r d i n a l 4 4 5 2 2

S k y l a r k 1 1 1

House F i n c h 1 4 1 0 7

House Sparrow 2 4 2 -

* A n e s t can occupy more t h a n a one month p e r i o d .

Page 22: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

Mean percentage o f j u v e n i l e b i r d s recorded d u r i n g 1,115 hours o f census ing f rom 1970-1972 i n t h e Kohala Mountain Fores t , Hawa i ' i

Month ( t o t a l hours censused)

Species January February March A p r i l May J u l y November ( t o t a l b i r d s (172.5) (150.5) (375.5) (79.0) (215.0) (101.0) (21.0)

counted)

'amaki h i (701)

' e l e p a i o (332)

( )* = t o t a l v i s u a l observa t ions each month

Page 23: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

Figure 1.

Map of a po r t ion of Kohala Mountain, Hawai'i, showing t h e s tudy a r e a (dark hashing) and l o c a t i o n s where comparative censuses were conducted. Eleva t ion con- t o u r s a r e i n meters , double dashed l i n e s a r e jeep roads, and l i g h t hashing denotes p a s t u r e land ad jacent t o t h e f o r e s t .

Page 24: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream
Page 25: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

Figure 2.

Average monthly numbers of nectarivorous birds recorded during counts from 1970-1972 in the Kohala Mountain Forest, Hawai'i. Numbers at the top in parentheses are sample sizes.

Page 26: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL

MONTHS

Page 27: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

Figure 3.

Average monthly numbers of the common non-nectarivo~ous passerine species recorded during counts from 1970-1972 in the Kohala Mountain Forest, Hawai'i. Numbers at the top in parentheses are sample sizes.

Page 28: 1/44 - University of Hawaiʻi · 2015. 5. 2. · between Puu Laelae and Kohakohau Gulch (Fig. 1). Comparative census locations were the Kehena Ditch Trail, Eke, and Kawainui Stream

(21.0) (172.5) (150.5)(375.5) (79.0)(215.0) (10 1.0) 0 - ELEPAiO I\ . *- 4 RED-BILLED I \ L EIOTHRIX i i8 *---a JAPANESE I \ WHITE-EYE

e

I \ 8

8

I \ .9

1- i I b * % 8 0 \ I

e

I \

d \ \

NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL

MONTHS