134 logeswaran

24
Paper Code: 134 A Review of Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms for Photovoltaic Systems under Uniform and Non-Uniform irradiances 06/09/2022 1

Transcript of 134 logeswaran

Page 1: 134 logeswaran

Paper Code: 134

A Review of Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms for Photovoltaic Systems under Uniform and Non-Uniform irradiances

04/12/2023 1

Page 2: 134 logeswaran

A Review of Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms for Photovoltaic

Systems under Uniform and Non-Uniform Irradiances

04/12/2023 2

byT.LOGESWARAN

Assistant Professor(SRG)Department of EEE

Kongu Engineering College, Perundurai, Erode, Tamilnadu, India

Dr.A.SENTHIL KUMAR, M.E.,PhD.,Prof & Head, Department of EEE

Dr.Mahalingam College of Engineering and Technology, Pollachi, Tamilnadu, India

Page 3: 134 logeswaran

IntroductionWhy Solar PV power systems? maintenance free noise free environmental friendly

04/12/2023 3

Page 4: 134 logeswaran

Block Diagram of PV Generation Systems

04/12/2023 4

Page 5: 134 logeswaran

Modelling of PV module Two diode model with seven parameters Two diode model with five parameters

04/12/2023 5

Two Diode model of the PV cell

Page 6: 134 logeswaran

Two Diode model of the PV cell

04/12/2023 6

Page 7: 134 logeswaran

simplified

04/12/2023 7

Series Parallel combination of the PV array

Page 8: 134 logeswaran

04/12/2023 8

Characteristics of PV Cell under PSC

Operation of PV array under partial shading

Page 9: 134 logeswaran

PV curves for each string

04/12/2023 9

Page 10: 134 logeswaran

PV curve of the entire array

04/12/2023 10

Page 11: 134 logeswaran

04/12/2023 11

CONVENTIONAL MPPT TECHNIQUES

Perturb and Observe Hill Climbing algorithm Incremental Conductance short circuit current open circuit voltage and ripple correlation control approaches

Page 12: 134 logeswaran

Intelligent MPPT Techniques

04/12/2023 12

FLC based MPPTMamdanis method is used for fuzzy

inference Centre of gravity method for

defuzzification and the duty ratio is computed

fuzzy rule base, which is dependent on the experience of algorithm developers – influences on the performance of MPPT

Page 13: 134 logeswaran

Artificial Neural Network based MPPT

04/12/2023 13

It is suitable for the system that can get sufficient training data

Page 14: 134 logeswaran

PSO based MPPT

04/12/2023 14

Demerits:• It is incapable of searching maxima• local convergence accuracy is not

high

Page 15: 134 logeswaran

ACO based MPPT

04/12/2023 15

The number of ants (M), Convergence speed (€), Solution archive (K) and Locality of search process (Q) ---- these parameters are to decided by the user

When choosing the number of ants, there will be tradeoff between convergence speed and tracking accuracy

Page 16: 134 logeswaran

Firefly algorithmFirefly algorithm is a bio inspired

metaheuristic algorithm for optimization problems

Introduced in 2009 at Cambridge University by Yang

Rules for constructing firefly algorithm:1) All fireflies are unisex2) Brightness of the firefly is determined from

the encoded objective function3) Attractiveness is directly proportional to

brightness but decreases with distance and a firefly will move towards the brighter one and if there is no brighter one, it will move randomly.

04/12/2023 16

Page 17: 134 logeswaran

04/12/2023 17

Page 18: 134 logeswaran

Firefly alorithmThe algorithm can be summarized as

follows:

I. Generate a random solution set, {x1, x2, . . . xk}

II. Compute intensity for each solution member,{I1, I2, ……. Ik}

III.Move each firefly i towards other brighter fireflies and if there is no other brighter firefly, move it randomly

IV. Update the solution setV. Terminate if a termination criterion is

fulfilled other wise go back to stepII. 04/12/2023 18

Page 19: 134 logeswaran

Conclusion:

Conventional MPPT algorithms does not find the global maxima. Intelligent MPPT techniques have merits and demerits. It is concluded that FA based MPPT will be suitable for partial shaded conditions.

04/12/2023 19

Page 20: 134 logeswaran

References. .

1. Bidyadhar Subudhi and Raseswari Pradhan (2013) “A Com-parative Study on Maximum Power Point Tracking Tech-niques for Photovoltaic Power Systems” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy,Vol. 4, No. 1

2. Moacyr Aureliano Gomes de Brito, Luigi Galotto,(2013) Jr., Leonardo Poltronieri Sampaio, Guilherme de Azevedo e Melo, and Carlos Alberto Canesin, Senior Member, “Evalua-tion of the Main MPPT Techniques for Photovoltaic Applica-tions” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, VOL. 60, NO. 3.

3. M. A. S. Masoum, H. Dehbonei, and E. F. Fuchs, 2002 “Theo-retical and experimental analyses of photovoltaic systems with voltage and current based maximum power point track-ing,” IEEE Trans. Energy Conv., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 514–522

4. B. Subudhi and R. Pradhan, 2011 “Characteristics evalua-tion and parameter extraction of a solar array based on ex-perimental analysis,” in Proc. 9th IEEE Power Electron. Drives Syst., Singapore

04/12/2023 20

Page 21: 134 logeswaran

References

5. [T. Esram, J. W. Kimball, P. T. Krein, P. L. Chapman, and P. Midya, (2006) “Dynamic maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic arrays using ripple correlation control,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 21, no.5, pp. 1282–1291

6. K. Ishaque, Z. Salam, and H. Taheri,(2011) “Simple, fast and accurate two diode model for photovoltaic modules,” Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells, vol. 95, pp. 586–594

7. K. Ishaque, Z. Salam, and H. Taheri,(2011) “Accurate MATLAB simulink PV system simulator based on a two-diode model,” J. Power Electron., vol. 11, pp. 179–187

8. Kashif Ishaque, Zainal Salam, Muhammad Amjad, and Saad Mekhilef,( 2012) “An Improved Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)–Based MPPT for PV With Reduced Steady-State Oscillation” IEEE transactions on Power Eelectronics, vol. 27, no. 8

04/12/2023 21

Page 22: 134 logeswaran

References

9. MASAFUMI MIYATAKE, MUMMADI VEERACHARY, NOBUHIKO FUJII, HIDEYOSHI KO , (2011) “ Maximum Power Point Tracking of Multiple Photovoltaic Arrays: A PSO Approach” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems VOL. 47, NO. 1.

10.Yi-Hwa Liu, Shyh-Ching Huang, Jia-Wei Huang, and Wen-Cheng Liang (2012) “A Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm for PV Systems Operating Under Partially Shaded Conditions” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, VOL. 27, NO. 4.

11.Mahmoud A. YOUNIS , Tamer KHATIB, Mushtaq NAJEEB, A Mohd ARIFFIN (2012), An Improved Maximum Power Point Tracking Controller for PV Systems Using Artificial Neural Network Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, R. 88 NR 3b

12.Whei-Min Lin, Member, IEEE, Chih-Ming Hong, and Chiung-Hsing Chen 2011, “Neural-Network-Based MPPT Control of a Stand-Alone Hybrid Power Generation System” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, VOL. 26, NO. 12.

04/12/2023 22

Page 23: 134 logeswaran

13. Lian Lian Jiang, Douglas L. Maskell, Jagdish C. Patra (2013), A Novel Ant Colony optimization based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems under partially shaded con-ditions, Energy and Buildings Vol 58. Pgs 227-236.

14. N. Chai-ead, P. Aungkulanon, and P. Luangpaiboon, Member, IAENG (2011), Bees and Firefly Algorithms for Noisy Non-Linear Optimization Problems Proceedings of the 26th Inter-national multi Conference of engineers andComputer Scien-tistsVolume II.

15. Surafel Luleseged Tilahun and Hong Choon Ong(2012) “Modi-fied Firefly Algorithm” Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Jour-nal of Applied Mathematics, Article ID 467631, 12 pages

16. A. Mathew and A. I. Selvakumar, (2006) “New MPPT for PV arrays using fuzzy controller in close cooperation with fuzzy cognitive network,” IEEE Trans. Energy Conv., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 793–803.

17. C.-S. Chiu, (2010)“T-S fuzzy maximum power point tracking control of solar power generation systems,” IEEE Trans. En-ergy Conv., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1123–1132.

04/12/2023 23

Page 24: 134 logeswaran

THANK YOU

04/12/2023 24