12.00 Josh Lerner

download 12.00 Josh Lerner

of 28

Transcript of 12.00 Josh Lerner

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    1/28

    New Insights into Sovereign

    Wealth Funds:Clues and Mysteries

    Josh Lerner

    Harvard Business School

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    2/28

    Important questions

    Where are sovereign wealth funds investing?

    How successful have these investments been?

    What drives the key differences in sovereignfund performance? Critical because of

    Size.

    Future growth. Role in economic development.

    Politicians concerns.

    Potential to supplant other intermediaries.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    3/28

    Limited insights

    Relative limited information on groups and

    their activities.

    Secrecy as a response to political controversy.

    Secrecy as an optimal investment strategy.

    At same time, lack of clarity can unwarranted

    suspicions and doubts.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    4/28

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    5/28

    But recent insights

    In last year, flurry of research into sovereign

    funds:

    About one dozen papers released.

    Have illuminated many aspects.

    Have exploded a number of myths about these

    funds.

    But leave a number of open issues.

    This talk will highlight the key new insights

    from these works.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    6/28

    The agenda

    A (very brief) history.

    The new insights and surprises.

    The open questions where research can addvalue.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    7/28

    Early days

    Pioneering awareness of Kuwait and others in

    1950s of need to prepare for the future.

    Variety of roles:

    Sources of capital for future generations:

    Like a university endowment.

    Provides an ability to smooth out cycles in

    commodity prices.

    Holding company for strategic investments by

    government.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    8/28

    Very different outcomes

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    9/28

    Very different outcomes (2)

    Kiribati:

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    10/28

    Significant players

    40-70 funds, depending on how you count.

    $3.5 trillion of assets:

    Morgan Stanley estimate, mid-2008.

    Big relative to hedge funds ($1.4 trillion).

    Only 1.2% of all investible assets world-wide:

    But rapid growth projected.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    11/28

    Insights from recent research

    Sovereign fund investments are good news for

    targets.

    Many concerns about investment strategies

    misplaced.

    Appear not to change firms in their portfolios.

    The troubled track record of domestic

    investments.

    The importance of fund governance.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    12/28

    1. Sovereign fund investments are

    good news for the target firms

    Dewenter, Han and Malatesta [2009] look at

    196 purchases and 47 sales of stock by SWFs.

    Adjusted stock price rises on news of

    purchase:

    Stock price up 1.7% on announcement.

    The bigger the stake, the more positive a

    reaction to a point.

    Sales trigger a 1.3% drop.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    13/28

    Reaction around stock purchase

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    14/28

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    15/28

    Evidence

    Miracky, et al. (2009): Sovereign funds primarily focus on emerging markets,

    not developed nations.

    Real estate and old economy industrial firms have

    been among most popular sectors. Appear to deliberately avoid sensitive industries and

    firms.

    Chhaochharia and Laeven (2009):

    Sovereign funds tend to invest in countries with similar religion and culture.

    with different industries than those in home country.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    16/28

    3. Little support for claims of

    distortions at portfolio companies

    Many complaints that SWFs may distort firms

    in unseen ways.

    Sovereign wealth funds are their own worst

    enemies. Most are not transparent or publicly

    accountable, and we know little about their

    governance structures or fiduciary controls. Senator Charles Schumer, Joint Economic Committee,

    February 13, 2008.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    17/28

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    18/28

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    19/28

    Change in P/E ratio in country and

    industry in year after investment

    P/E change

    after domestic

    investment

    P/E change

    after foreign

    investment

    Asian

    sovereign

    funds

    -4.3 +0.7

    Middle East

    sovereign

    funds

    -5.3 -0.9

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    20/28

    Troubling domestic performance

    Asian and Mid-Eastern funds have negative

    industry P/E returns in year after deal at home

    (though about zero abroad):

    Similar results hold for the returns of the subset

    of publicly traded firms.

    Moreover, since many investments made at

    relative peak, unlikely to be rescuingcompanies.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    21/28

    5. The funds organizational

    structure matters a lot

    Can governance structures help to explain the

    differences in investments across SWFs?

    Would like to look at a broad array of measures.

    For now, focus on whether political leaders

    involved in the decision-making:

    Data collected by JP Morgan as of 2008.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    22/28

    Example: Alaska Permanent Fund

    Emil Notti, appointed February, 2007Emil Notti is an engineer, prominent Alaska Native leader and Alaska public servant. He

    graduated from Northrop University with a dual degree in aeronautical and electrical

    engineering, and also holds an Honorary Doctorate degree from the Alaska Methodist

    University. He was first president of the Alaska Federation of Natives, past president of

    Doyon Limited, former Commissioner of the Department of Community and Regional

    Affairs; 30-year board member with the National Bank of Alaska; and Veteran of the

    United States Navy. In February, 2007,Governor Palin appointed Mr. Notti Commissioner

    of the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development, and to serve

    on the APFC board. Mr. Notti also held his commissioner's position, and served on the

    APFC Board, from1985 to 1986.

    Steve Rieger, appointed July, 2009

    Steve Rieger currently operates his own management and finance consulting businesses

    in Anchorage, and is a state-registered investment adviser. He earned a bachelors

    degree in economics from Harvard University, and a masters degree in business

    administration from Harvards Graduate School of Business Administration. Mr. Riegerserved three terms in the Alaska House of Representatives and one in the Senate,

    representing south Anchorage. A member of both House and Senate finance

    committees, his extensive legislative experience included the state operating and capital

    budgets, economics, banking, and the Permanent Fund. As a legislative staffer before his

    election, Rieger helped develop the legislation establishing the Alaska Permanent Fund

    Corporation, and worked with Wall Street firms regarding its investment guidelines and

    governance. He was appointed to the APFC board in July, 2009 by Governor Palin, for a

    four-year term.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    23/28

    Example: Alaska Permanent Fund

    Emil Notti, appointed February, 2007Emil Notti is an engineer, prominent Alaska Native leader and Alaska public servant. He

    graduated from Northrop University with a dual degree in aeronautical and electrical

    engineering, and also holds an Honorary Doctorate degree from the Alaska Methodist

    University. He was first president of the Alaska Federation of Natives, past president of

    Doyon Limited, former Commissioner of the Department of Community and Regional

    Affairs; 30-year board member with the National Bank of Alaska; and Veteran of the

    United States Navy. In February, 2007,Governor Palin appointed Mr. Notti Commissioner

    of the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development, and to serve

    on the APFC board. Mr. Notti also held his commissioner's position, and served on the

    APFC Board, from1985 to 1986.

    Steve Rieger, appointed July, 2009

    Steve Rieger currently operates his own management and finance consulting businesses

    in Anchorage, and is a state-registered investment adviser. He earned a bachelors

    degree in economics from Harvard University, and a masters degree in business

    administration from Harvards Graduate School of Business Administration. Mr. Riegerserved three terms in the Alaska House of Representatives and one in the Senate,

    representing south Anchorage. A member of both House and Senate finance

    committees, his extensive legislative experience included the state operating and capital

    budgets, economics, banking, and the Permanent Fund. As a legislative staffer before his

    election, Rieger helped develop the legislation establishing the Alaska Permanent Fund

    Corporation, and worked with Wall Street firms regarding its investment guidelines and

    governance. He was appointed to the APFC board in July, 2009 by Governor Palin, for a

    four-year term.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    24/28

    Sovereign fund investment type

    and performancePoliticians on

    Investment

    Committee

    Politicians Not on

    Investment

    Committee

    Share of deals in home

    country 44% 31%Share of deals in home

    country or region75% 60%

    Average deal size($MMs) 190 148

    Change in P/E ratio in

    industry and country

    in year after deal

    -2.6 -0.8

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    25/28

    Governance and investment

    choices

    SWFs are more likely to invest at home if

    politicians are involved in investments

    Politician-influenced SWFs:

    Invest in industries with higher P/E ratios.

    Obtain a negative change in industry P/E

    the following year.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    26/28

    Open issues where research can

    add value How to should respond to changing conditions:

    E.g., natural resource price changes and investmentstrategies?

    What are consequences of more transparencyabout investment strategies?

    What incentive schemes are best at attractingand retaining professional staff?

    How can continue to generate returns as growlarger?

    Particularly challenging in alternative investments.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    27/28

    Taking stock

    So far, much of research has told us what we

    know already.

    But important because it provides

    Ammunition to address critics.

    Underlines areas where opportunities to change.

    But more work is surely needed:

    Much of which should be more useful to funds.

  • 8/6/2019 12.00 Josh Lerner

    28/28

    Josh LernerRock Center for Entrepreneurship

    Harvard Business School

    Boston, MA 02163 USA

    1-617-495-6065

    [email protected]

    www.people.hbs.edu/jlerner

    mailto:[email protected]://www.people.hbs.edu/jlernerhttp://www.people.hbs.edu/jlernermailto:[email protected]