1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber
description
Transcript of 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber
![Page 1: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber
G. Viehhauser (Oxford)C. Haber (LBNL)T. Hurteau, W. Emmet (Yale)R. Rurns, D. Lynn (BNL)Stave Meeting, Oxford, UK, Feb 2012
![Page 2: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
New Co-Cure Experiments at LBNL
• 0-90-0 is a better configuration for mechanical performance but curvature issue is more acute (tight bend across cable)
• Have studied co-cure on a curved template, sized to compensate for bend, worked well on a stavelet cable• In the process of co-curing two full cables in this way in order to laminate a full stave• Pre-co-cure metrology complete
Cable co-cured flatCure inside 9.5 inchpipe result
![Page 3: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Facing challenges for stave cutting facings
Twisted/bowed facing. We were not able to hold down on our vacuum fixture for cutting(but our vacuum fixture was poor. Remaking it might work)
Kapton side is flat across CF-to-kapton transition
Targets proved useful when we cut the facings
Different thickness on CF-only side due to kapton cable
![Page 4: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Tear in Facing and Zoomed Look at Ridge
![Page 5: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
tm-b2-011 152.4 152.4 139.7 139.7 203.2 152.4 139.7 152.4 152.42 381 368.3 355.6 355.6 381 368.3 355.6 381 3813 317.5 431.8 406.4 381 406.4 381 381 419.1 368.34 533.4 381 381 381 393.7 355.6 381 368.3 368.35 406.4 215.9 177.8 165.1 215.9 152.4 165.1 177.8 177.86 368.3 3817 355.6 3818 177.8 152.4
Approximate measurement locations
Pre-Cut Facing Thickness Measurements
Serial Power Ground return clearly seen on CF side of facing as a raised ridge, but not so much seen in thickness data
Note: All measurements in microns
![Page 6: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
New Cut Facing Width
• Previous specification on facings for old 1.3 meter stave was 120 mm minimum, and 120.25 mm maximum, and we achieved this.
• For this stave we specificed 120.5 mm minimum, 121 mm maximum due to difficulty in achieving this we the co-cured facings
• We had also anticipated such a change in tolerance when we redesigned the bracket and the angle of its contact points
![Page 7: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Cutting the facings
• In the end we clamped down the facings and used a straight-edge and razor
• The edge is not so nice but acceptable• In the future would still prefer rotary fine tooth saw and vacuum chuck,
but we ran out of time to make this work
![Page 8: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Cut Facing Widths
Note: facings from LBNL were numbered 1 and 3, not 1 and two
Facing widths (in mm)
One facing was in tolerance, one slightly over. But this was ok because we still have plenty of clearance from jig supports (as well as bracket supports)
![Page 9: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Note that our support design has cf tubes centers spaced 119 mm,If aluminum was more narrow the gluing would be on facing slope
![Page 10: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Gluing the CF Tubes Side Rails
• To keep facing flat this step and all the following glue steps we had to use lead weights to keep the bowed facing flat.
• Bow was mostly in transverse direction
![Page 11: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Post- Gluing the CF Tubes Side Rails—Transverse Bow
![Page 12: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Gluing the Foam-Pipe Assembly
![Page 13: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Pre-Gluing the Honeycomb
Post-Gluing the Honeycomb
![Page 14: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Post-Gluing the Honeycomb—Kapton Side
![Page 15: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Post Final Facing Attachment
• Stave became flatter (measurements to follow)
• 2nd Facing to CF pipes glue attachment was not ideal. Will fix, but will need to improve process in the future
![Page 16: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Weight [grams]
Total Stave Weight 390.4
facing 1 84.7facing 3 84.6cf tubes 18.3Stainless Steel Pipe+Fittings 76.1closeouts 3.4CGL on foam and pipe 15.3foam 50.4honeycomb 25.3hysol 30% BN facing #1 15.6hysol 30% BN facing #3 16.8
projected cf facing weight [g]32
projected bus cable weight53
Stave Component Weights
x 12/10 compare to Tim 12/9.8Weight [g] X0 [g/cm^2] RL [%] RL norm to det [%] RL norm to det [%]
Pipe 106.3 13.9 0.49 0.59 0.60Foam 45.6 43 0.07 0.08 0.08CGL 15 33.4 0.03 0.03 0.04Facings 104.8 43 0.16 0.19 0.19CF Tubes 38.7 43 0.06 0.07 0.07Closeouts 4.2 43 0.01 0.01 0.01Hysol 30.7 42.4 0.05 0.06 0.06Honeycomb 24.7 43 0.04 0.04 0.05
0.00 0.00Total 370 0.89 1.07 1.09
fitings 16.6
new total 386.6
Co-cured 1.2 m Stave Weights Co-cured Facing Component Weights [g]
Previous 1.3 meter stave weights, no kapton bus
• Used lighter ss pipes in co-cured stave. • If directly comparing, main mass
improvement is 40 grams in carbon fiber facings
![Page 17: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
4 Point Support Stave Profile, Side 1 and 3
![Page 18: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
4 Point Support Stave Profile, Side 3
![Page 19: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
4 Point Support Stave Profile, Side 3 (Flattened in Software)
![Page 20: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Co-Cure Stave Thickness Measurements
![Page 21: 1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070422/5681642e550346895dd5f4e7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Final Thoughts on Assembly with Co-cured Facings
• Possibly would prefer extended transverse bus for constant thickness
• Metallization may be used to indicate cut line
• Twist creates some problems, mostly for holding facing flat during cutting and grinding
• We might prefer a wider bus (see bottom) to create a uniform facing thickness
• We did not really address alignment issues (top facing to bottom, for example).
• However, all of these problems seem manageable and most glue steps were no more difficult than with flat facings and only required more weight (lead bricks) to keep things flat