12-decisionmaking
-
Upload
pepper-nakamaru -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
description
Transcript of 12-decisionmaking
![Page 1: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Why make decisions in group?• What problems undermine the effectiveness
of decision-making in groups?• Why do groups make riskier decisions than
individuals?• What is groupthink, and how can it be
prevented?
![Page 3: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Why people rely on groups?
• Being better at choosing, judging, estimating, and problem solving
• Forming more accurate perceptions of people
• Making more accurate diagnosis (physicians)
• Getting better grades (students)
![Page 4: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Majorie E. Shaw (1932)
• Participants: 21 individuals and five 4-person groups
• Task: missionary-cannibal dilemma• Procedure:
work alone work in groupwork in group work alone
![Page 5: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Three missionaries and three cannibals are on one side of the river and want to cross to the other side by means of a boat that can only hold two persons at a time. All the missionaries can row, but only one cannibal can row. For obvious reasons, the missionaries must never be outnumbered by the cannibals, under any circumstances or at any time, except where no missionaries are present at all. How many crossings will be necessary to transport the six people across the river?
![Page 6: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Marjorie E. Shaw’s Finding (1932)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1st Set 2nd Set
groupsindividuals
• Groups generated more correct solutions
• Groups were better at detecting errors
• Groups made mistakes later than did individuals
• Groups took longer to complete the task
Per
cent
age
Cor
rect
![Page 7: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Groups do not perform well when
• tasks are very difficult, complex, unfamiliar, uninteresting
• time is limited• performing judgmental tasks (compared to
intellective tasks)
![Page 8: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
OrientationDefining the
problemPlanning the
processDiscussion
Remembering informationExchanging informationProcessing information
Decision MakingChoosing group
solutions
ImplementationAdhering to
the decisionEvaluating the
decision
A functional model of group decision making
![Page 9: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Orientation
• The development of a shared mental model that they rely on throughout the rest of the meeting
• Group members rarely show much interest in process planning
![Page 10: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Discussion
• A collective information processing approach to decision making assume that people seek out and process relevant information during the group discussion
• Three information processing gains from discussion are– improved memory for information– increased information exchanged– more thorough processing of information
![Page 11: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
What is the value of discussion?
![Page 12: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Groups have superior memories for
information relative to individuals• Groups have better informational
resources than individuals--collective memory
• Cross-cuing improves group memories• Groups enhance their collective
memories by creating transactive memory systems that effectively divide up information among members
![Page 13: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Groups have more information than do individuals
• Some members may know a great deal about tasks or some relevant information
• Groups can get more information
![Page 14: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Groups process the information they have more
thoroughly through discussion• Members ask questions and others offer
answers• Members discuss alternative options,
considering the strength and weakness of each option
![Page 15: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Deciding
• A social decision scheme – implicit scheme
• Truth-wins rule (adopting the correct answer as the group solution)
• Majority-rules model (selecting a decision favored by more than 50% of group members)
![Page 16: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Deciding
• A social decision scheme– Explicit scheme
• Delegating decisions• Statisticized decisions• Plurality decisions (voting, ranking)• Unanimous decisions (consensus)• Random decisions (chance)
![Page 17: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Implementation
• Implementing the decision• Evaluating the decision• Involving in planning is important
![Page 18: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Vroom’s normative model of decision making
• Different types of situations call for different types of decision-making methods– Autocratic I– Autocratic II– Consultative I– Consultative II– Group II
![Page 19: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
5 basic types of decision-making process (Vroom, 2003)
• Decide: leader solves the problem or makes the decision and announces it to the group
• Consult (Individual): leader shares the problem with group members individually, then the leader makes the decision
• Consult (Group): leader discusses the problem with members as a group, then leader makes the decision
![Page 20: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
5 basic types of decision-making process (Vroom, 2003)
• Facilitate: leader collaborates with group members, helping the group to reach consensus, accepting the decision that is supported by the entire group
• Delegate: group reaches a decision without the leader’s involvement. The leader provides support, direction, clarification, and resources.
![Page 21: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Problems when groups make decisions• Poor communication
skills• Egocentric behavior• Nonparticipation• Sidetracked• Interruptions • Negative leadership
behavior• Negative attitudes and
emotions
![Page 22: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
What Problems Undermine the Effectiveness of
Decision-Making Groups? • Group discussion pitfalls
– Information processing limitations: leveling, assimilation, sharpening
– Poor communication skills– Decisional avoidance (procrastination,
bolstering, denying responsibility, satisficing)
![Page 23: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Tactics used during discussion to avoid making a decision• The group postpones the decision
• Formulating a decision without thinking things through… exaggerating the favorable consequences and minimizing the importance and likelihood of unfavorable consequences
• Avoiding responsibility by delegating the decision to a subcommittee or by diffusing accountability throughout the entire assemblage
![Page 24: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• Ignoring alternatives… considering only the narrow range of policy alternatives that differ very little from the existing policy• Accepting any solution that meets the minimal set of criteria instead of finding the best solution• Avoid dealing with the larger issues by focusing on minor issues• Sometimes decisions demand too much cognitive work from members
![Page 25: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
What Problems Undermine the Effectiveness of Decision-Making Groups?
• Shared information bias – Oversampling shared information leads to poorer
decisions when a hidden profile would be revealed by considering the unshared information more closely
– Stasser and Titus (1985)’s experiment– Informational and normative influence cause this bias– Factors that increase (leadership style) and decrease
(using a GDSS) the bias
![Page 26: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
What Problems Undermine the Effectiveness of Decision-Making Groups?
• Judgment errors and heuristic biases – Sins of omission and commission– Sins of imprecision: Heuristics
![Page 27: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
When and why do groups make poor decisions?
• Groups spend more time discussing shared information rather than unshared information
• Unshared information, although inadequately discussed, still influences judgment
• The best decision will go unrecognized if members fail to pool their unshared information
• An effective discussion leader can prompt members to reveal unshared information and keep the group’s attention focused on that information by repeating it during the discussion
![Page 28: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Social decision theory: Group wh ose members are initially more risk
prone than cautious seem to adopt - a “risk supported wins” scheme. If
more than one member favors the r isky alternative, the group will ado
pt it. When the majority members l ean toward the cautious pole, the g -roup seems to adopt a “cautious su
pported wins” scheme. If two mem bers support conservative solution,
the group chooses that alternative
![Page 29: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Group polarization• Groups’ decisions tend to be more
extreme than individuals’ decisions• Risky shift vs. cautious shift is founded• Group polarization hypothesis: the
average postgroup response will tend to be more extreme in the same direction as the average of the pregroup responses
![Page 30: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
What causes polarization?
• Social comparison theory (value hypothesis): When individuals discuss their opinions in a group, they shift in the direction that they think is consistent with the values of their group or culture
• Persuasive-argument theory: If discussion exposes the individual to persuasive arguments that favor Position A, the person will shift in that direction. If the discussion generates more anti A argument, the individual will shift in that direction
![Page 33: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Groupthink Symptoms of Groupthink
• Interpersonal pressures make agreeing too easy and disagreeing too difficult
• Members privately felt uncertain about the plan, -- -but they kept their doubts to themselves self ce
nsorship• Someone appointed himself/herself as a guard to
protect members from information that they thin --k will disrupt the group mindguards
• Each member wrongly concludes that everyone e lse liked the plan, so no objections surfaced durin
-- g the discussion apparent unanimity
![Page 34: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
• Members felt that they were performing well -- , even though they were not illusion of invulnerability
• Decision makers lose their moral thought in -- the group’s desire to win illusion of morality
• Group members expressed their biased perc eptions of the outgroup during the discussio
n• Decision are inadequate
![Page 35: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Causes of groupthink• Cohesiveness• -- Isolation no outsiders participate in the discuss
ion• -- Leadership the leader completely controlled th
e group discussion, made his opinion clear at th e outset of each meeting, suppressed any disse
nting opinions, required a voice vote by each m ember without prior group discussion
• The group coped with the stress when making a major decision by minimizing argument or disse nsion, maximizing the positive consequences
![Page 36: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
![Page 37: 12-decisionmaking](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022020421/568c0d1c1a28ab955a8b7f69/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
How to prevent groupthink?
• Limiting a premature seeking of concurrence• Correcting group members’ misperceptions
and biases• Using effective decision-making technique