12 bba 43
-
Upload
linesh-brahmakhatri -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
description
Transcript of 12 bba 43
-
A
WINTER TRAINING REPORT
ON
COMPERATIVE STUDY OF SAMSUNG AND
MICROMAX TABLET IN VARACHHA REGION
SUBMITTED BY:
NIKUNJ GOTI L.
(12BBA43)
GUIDED BY:
MR. RAKESH PATEL
BBA PROGRAMME
(YEAR 2014-2015)
SHREE J. D. GABANI COMMERCE COLLEGE AND
SHREE SWAMI ATMANAND SARASWATI COLLEGE OF
MANAGEMENT,
VNSGU, SURAT
-
I
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the winter project report has been prepaid by NIKUNJ
GOTI L. (12BBA43), under my guidance and supervision. This project embodied
the result of her work and is of standard expected from a candidate for the
degree of BBA.
The report submitted towards the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the
degree of BBA has been found satisfactory.
Name of Principal Name of Guide
Mr. P.R Patel Mr. Rakesh Patel
Date:
Place: Surat
-
II
DECLARATION
I here declare that this winter project report submitted to SHREE J.D.G
COMMERCE COLLEGE & SHREE SWAMI ATMANAND SARASWATI
COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT, SURAT, in the fulfillment of requirement of
B.B.A. degree. The project is result of my own work carried out during Jan-
Feb 2014.
This project report is entirely an outcome of my own efforts and has not
been previously submitted to any other university or institute for any other
examination and for any other purpose by any other person.
Date: Nikunj goti l.
Place: Surat (12BBA43)
-
III
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Today in the world of competition training is needed to overcome shortage of
skill and knowledgeable person as well as for the personnel development
and career advancement. It is a great opportunities for me to do such type
of training which help me in my career development and providing more
knowledge about working process of organization.
I am also thankful to Mr. P.R. Patel (Principle of collage) and Mr. Rakesh
Patel (Guide) for his valuable advice. I am also thankful all staff of Shree
swami Atman and Saraswati collage of Management and information
science, Surat for their co-ordination.
Last but not least I am also thankful to my friends who supported me
during the deed of the project work.
-
IV
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Firstly, I have included certain things like industry details, Company details
like history of Samsung and Micromax tablet. It is one of the fastest growing
industries in the world.
The objective behind preparing the report has been mentioned in brief and
the main objective is to study comparatives study of Samsung and
Micromax tablet in varachha region.
There are certain limitation of the project report like shortage of time, given
for conducting the market survey is limited and the limitation of response
decreased.
The descriptive research design is use in my project. It covers the buying
guide for Samsung and Micromax tablet product providers. I have user rank
in open ended and close ended question. So, that respondent does not find
it boring information is collected by conducting personal visit of 200
respondents.
The report includes seven chapters.
The first chapter is industry profile. It includes industrial detail and major
players of the industry.
The second chapter is company profile. It includes information and overview
of Samsung and Micromax tablet product providers.
The third chapter is literature review. Literature review explains previous
study on tablet product provided by the tablet company provider. It also
explains the previous study about the customer preference towards
Samsung and Micromax tablet product providers.
The forth chapter is research methodology. Research methodology provides
information about the sample size, sampling design, sampling unit;
-
V
research instrument used problem statement, research objective, research
design, data collection methods and limitation of the study.
The fifth chapter is data analysis. In it all collected information are analysed
through Ms Excel and Ms Word, and all the collected information is shown
through bar chart.
The sixth chapter is findings. The outcome of the each data is mention
under this heading.
The seventh chapter is conclusion. In conclusion mention the overview of
study. In this, the most of respondents are using the Samsung and
Micromax tablet product providers. So provider should over come ones
competition. So, it leads to adding new features, scheme, and periodical
offers to their products.
-
VI
TABLE OF CONTENT
SR NO. TOPIC PAGE NO.
TITLE PAGE -
COLLEGE CERTIFICATE I
DECLARATION II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT III
EXECUTIVE SUMMERY IV
1 INTRODUCTION 1-15
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 16-20
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 21-22
4 DATA ANALYSIS 23-46
5 FINDINGS 47-48
6 CONCLUSION 49
7 BIBLIOGRAPHY -
8 ANNEXURE -
-
CHAPTER: - 1
INTRODUCTION
-
1
SAMSUNG COMPANY PROFILE
Samsung history:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the chief subsidiary of South Korea's giant
Samsung Group and the largest electronics producer in Asia. Samsung
Electronics operates four main divisions including Digital Media,
Semiconductors, Information & Communications, and Home Appliances.
The company sells televisions, video and audio equipment computers and
related products phones, cellular phones, and fax machines home
appliances semiconductors network-related products factory automation
products fiber optics products closed circuit security products motors and
compressors and solar energy systems. In 2000, Samsung Electronics held
the leading market position in the code division multiple access (CDMA)
Handset, DRAM, SRAM, and color monitor markets.
Samsung Company:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is mainly engaged in the production of
consumer electronic products. It operates in three business divisions:
consumer electronics (CE) division, which involves in the color televisions
(CTVs), monitors, printers, air conditioners, refrigerators, laundry machines
and others information technology & mobile communications (IM) division,
which involves in the production of computers, handhold phones (HHPs),
network systems, digital cameras and others, as well as device solutions
(DM) division, which is divided into semiconductor and display business
parts, providing dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), flashes, thin
film transistor-liquid crystal displays (TFT-LCDs) and others. The Company
distributes its products within domestic market and to overseas markets.
-
2
Product:
Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. manufactures Consumer Electronics, IT
and Telecom products. Samsung began operations in India through its
manufacturing complex located at Noida (UP), which today houses facilities
for Color Televisions (including 3D, LED and LCD Televisions), Mobile
Phones, and tablets, Refrigerators, Washing Machines and Split Air
Conditioners categories. Samsung India's product categories also include
Slim TVs and Side by Side Refrigerators. The company's head office is based
in Delhi.
As a unit of behemoth Samsung Electronics, Samsung India Electronics
works to keep its customers connected through its growing products
portfolio. It develops and manufactures a wide variety of consumer
electronics devices, including DVD players, plasma televisions, digital
cameras, personal computers, color monitors, LCD panels, printers, and
computer peripherals. The New Delhi-based company also makes and
markets semiconductors, such as DRAMs, SRAMs, and flash memory
products. Ranging from wireless phones to networking switches, Samsung
India produces communications devices, as well. The electronics firm counts
consumers, corporations, schools, and government agencies among its
primary customers.
Samsung tablet market share:
Tablet market share of Samsung has increased to 22.2 percent in Q3 2014
from 19 percent in Q2 2014.
-
3
SAMSUNG COMPANY INDUSTRY PROFILE
Samsung Town, Seoul
Industry Conglomerate
Founded 1938
Founders Lee Byung-chul
Headquarters Seoul, South Korea
Area served Worldwide
Key people Lee Kun-hee
(Chairman of Samsung Electronics)
-
4
Products Apparel, chemicals, consumer electronics, electronic components,
medical equipment, precision instruments, semiconductors,
ships, telecommunications equipment
Services Advertising, construction, entertainment, financial services, hospitality,
information and communications technology services, medical services,
retail
Revenue US$ 327 billion (2013)
Net income US$ 30.1 billion (2013)
Total assets US$ 100.4 billion (2013)
Total equity US$ 70.3 billion (2013)
Employees 427,000 (2013)
Subsidiaries Samsung Electronics
Samsung Life Insurance
Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance
Samsung Heavy Industries
Samsung C&T
Samsung SDS
Samsung Tec win
Samsung Motors(Renault-Samsung Motors(cars division)) etc.
Website Samsung.com
-
5
Samsung is a South Korean multinational conglomerate company
headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous
subsidiaries and affiliated businesses, most of them united under
the Samsung brand, and are the largest South Korea.
Samsung was founded by Lee Byung-chul in 1938 as a trading company.
Over the next three decades, the group diversified into areas including food
processing, textiles, insurance, securities and retail. Samsung entered
the electronics industry in the late 1960s and the construction and
shipbuilding industries in the mid-1970s; these areas would drive its
subsequent growth. Following Lee's death in 1987, Samsung was separated
into four business group Samsung Group, Shinseki Group, CJ
Group and Hanson Group. Since 1990s, Samsung has increasingly
globalized its activities, and electronics, particularly mobile phones and
semiconductors, have become its most important source of income.
Notable Samsung industrial subsidiaries include Samsung
Electronics (the world's largest information technology company measured
by 2012 revenues, and 4th in market value), Samsung Heavy Industries (the
world's 2nd-largest shipbuilder measured by 2010 revenues), and Samsung
Engineering and Samsung C&T (respectively the world's 13th and 36th-
largest construction companies).
Samsung has a powerful influence on South Korea's economic development,
politics, media and culture, and has been a major driving force behind the
"Miracle on the Han River". Its affiliate companies produce around a fifth of
South Korea's total exports. Samsung's revenue was equal to 17% of South
Korea's $1,082 billion GDP.
In 2013, Samsung began construction on building the world's largest mobile
phone factory in the Thai Nguyen province of Vietnam. Samsung has been
able to achieve the largest market share of nearly 31% in the global
smartphone segment, as of 2013.
-
6
Samsung industry operation profile:
Samsung comprises around 80 companies. It is highly diversified, with
activities in areas including construction, consumer electronics, financial
services, shipbuilding, and medical services.
Subsidiaries and affiliates:
As of April 2011, the Samsung Group comprised 59 unlisted companies and
19 listed companies, all of which had their primary listing on the Korea
Exchange.
Principal subsidiary and affiliate companies of Samsung
include:
Ace Digitech:
Ace Digitech is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.
Cheil Industries:
Cheil Industries is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.
Samsung Card:
Samsung Card is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.
Samsung SDS:
Samsung SDS is a multinational IT Service company headquartered in
Seoul. It was founded in March 1985. Its principal activity is the providing
IT system (ERP, IT Infrastructure, IT Consulting, IT Outsourcing, Data
Center). Samsung SDS is the Korea's largest IT service company. It achieved
total revenues of 6,105.9 billion won.
Samsung C & T Corporation:
Samsung C&T Corporation is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.
-
7
Samsung Electro-Mechanics:
Samsung Electro-Mechanics, established in 1973 as a manufacturer of key
electronic components, is headquartered in Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South
Korea. It is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.
Samsung Electronics:
Samsung Electronics is a multinational electronics and information
technology company headquartered in Suwon and the flagship company of
the Samsung Group. Its products include air conditioners, computers,
digital televisions, liquid crystal displays (including thin (TFTs) and active-
matrix organic light-emitting diodes (AMOLEDs)), mobile phones, monitors,
printers, refrigerators, semiconductors, and telecommunications
networking equipment. It is the world's largest mobile phone maker by unit
sales in the first quarter of 2012; with a global market share of 25.4%.It is
also the world's second-largest semiconductor maker by 2011 revenues
(after Intel).
Samsung Electronics is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.
Samsung Engineering:
Samsung Engineering is a multinational construction company
headquartered in Seoul. It was founded in January 1969. Its principal
activity is the construction of oil refining plants; upstream oil and gas
facilities; petrochemical plants and gas plants; steel making plants; power
plants; water treatment facilities; and other infrastructure. It achieved total
revenues of 9,298.2 billion won (US$8.06 billion) in 2011.
Samsung Engineering is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.
-
8
Samsung Ever land:
Samsung Ever land engages in an array of services closely associated with
the day-to-day lives and business operations of its customers. Its business
scope covers the three main sectors of Environment & Asset, Food Culture,
and Resort.
Since its inception in 1963 and the launch of theme park "Overland" in
1976, Samsung Ever land has steadily built its presence across the markets
of golf, building management, food and beverage, energy, and environment.
Samsung Fine Chemicals:
Samsung Fine Chemicals is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.
Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance:
Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance is a multinational general
insurance company headquartered in Seoul. It was founded in January
1952 as Korea Anbo Fire a d Marine Insurance and was renamed Samsung
Fire & Marine Insurance in December 1993. Samsung Fire & Marine
Insurance offers services including accident insurance, automobile
insurance, casualty insurance, fire insurance, liability insurance, marine
insurance, personal pensions and loans.
Samsung Fire has been listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange since
1975.
-
9
Samsung Heavy Industries:
Samsung Heavy Industries is a shipbuilding and engineering company
headquartered in Seoul. It was founded in August 1974. Its principal
products are bulk carriers, container vessels, crude oil tankers, cruisers,
passenger ferries, material handling equipment steel and bridge
structures. It achieved total revenues of 13,358.6 billion won in 2011 and is
the world's second-largest shipbuilder by revenues (after Hyundai Heavy
Industries).
Samsung Heavy Industries is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.
Samsung Life Insurance:
Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd. is a multinational life insurance company
headquartered in Seoul. It was founded in March 1957 as Dongbang Life
Insurance and became an affiliate of the Samsung Group in July
1963. Samsung Life's principal activity is the provision of individual life
insurance and annuity products and services.
Samsung Machine Tools:
Samsung Machine Tools of America is a national distributor of machines in
the United States. Samsung GM Machine Tools is the head office of China,
its SMEC Legal incorporated company.
Samsung medical center:
The Samsung Medical Center was founded on November 9, 1994, under the
philosophy of contributing to improving the nations health through the
best medical service, advanced medical research, and development of
outstanding medical personnel". The Samsung Medical Center consists of a
hospital and a cancer center.
-
10
SAMSUNG COMPANY PROFILE
Micromax history
The history of Micromax (2011-12 revenue: Rs 1,978 core or Rs 19.78
billion), which ventured into the mobile phone market in 2008, is one of the
most fascinating success stories in the Indian consumer electronics
industry.
In barely five years, the company has come to occupy the third position (by
volume) in the mobile handset market in India and is at No. 12 globally.
It leads the Indian tablet market with a share of 18.4 per cent, ahead of
veterans Samsung and Apple.
The Gurgaon-headquartered company owes its success not just to the ticket
it puts on its products or the speed with which it puts new designs on the
shelves but to how it has managed these two crucial product inputs by
leveraging China.
To be more specific, the labor cost advantage and the production flexibility
that China offered.
Micromax Company
Micromax Informatics Limited is one of the leading consumer electronics
company in India and the 10th largest mobile phone player in the world.
Over the past decade, Micromax has pioneered the democratization of
technology in India by offering affordable innovations through their product
offerings and removing barriers for large scale adoption of advanced
technologies. Micromax is currently the 2nd largest smartphone company in
India. Micromax is a brand which is close to the heart of the youth and
celebrates the vibrancies of life and empowerment.
-
11
Products
Micromax products have become an extension of the Indian youths lifestyle
and dynamism. The company has many firsts to its credit when it comes to
the mobile handset market including the 30-day battery backup, Dual SIM
Dual Standby phones, QWERTY keypads, universal remote control mobile
phones, first quad-core budget smart phone etc. The brands product
portfolio embraces more than 60 models today, ranging from feature rich,
dual SIM phones, 3G Android smartphones, tablets, LED televisions and
data cards. Micromax sells around 2.3 million Mobility Devices every month,
with a presence in more than 560 districts through 1, 25,000 retail outlets
in India.
Network & reach
With sales presence across India and global presence in Russia and SAARC
markets, the Indian brand is reaching out to the global frontier with
innovative products that challenge the status quo that Innovation comes
with a price.
Micromax tablet market share
Micromax tablet share dipped 15 percent to 10.9 percent from 14 percent.
-
12
MICROMAX COMPANY INDUSTRY PROFILE
Micromax Informatics Ltd.
Type Private
Industry Telecommunications, Consumer
Founded Delhi, India (29 March 2000)
Founders Rahul Sharma
Vikas Jain
Sumeet Arora
Rajesh Agarwal
Headquarters Gurgaon, Haryana, India
Area served India, Russia, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal
Key people Sanjay Kapoor (Chairman)
Vineet Taneja (CEO)
Shubhodip Pal (CMO)
Products Mobile phones, smartphones,tablet
computers, 3GDatacards, LED televisions
Revenue US$ 2.2 billion (2014)[1]
Website Micromaxinfo.com
-
13
Micromax is an Indian consumer electronics company headquartered
in Gurgaon, Haryana, India. Micromax started as an IT software company in
2000 and worked on embedded platforms. It entered the mobile handset
business, and became one of the largest Indian domestic mobile handsets
company operating in low cost feature phone segments by 2010.
Micromax was incorporated as Micromax Informatics Ltd. on 29 March
2000. They started manufacturing mobile phones in 2008 with a focus on
low pricing, in order to compete with international brands. Because of the
issues of power in Dewas , Mohit Gangadhar Sharma saw a phone being
powered by a truck battery and decided to develop a longer battery
life. Micromax launched its first phone with a month long battery back-up
known as X1i. In 2011, Micromax entered the tablet market with the
Canvas series.
In 2014, Micromax surpassed Samsung to become the mobile phone
manufacturer shipping the most number of phones in a single quarter in
India. On 24 January 2014, Micromax became the first Indian mobile
company to start sales in Russia.
Originally, the company sourced all its mobile phones from China. However,
since April 2014, they have started manufacturing mobile phones and
tablets at their facility in Rudraprayag, Uttarakhand.
-
14
MICROMAX INDUSTRY OPERATION PROFILE
Television
One overriding characteristic of consumer electronic products is the trend of
ever-falling prices. This is driven by gains in manufacturing efficiency
and automation, lower labor costs as manufacturing has moved to lower-
wage countries, and improvements in semiconductor design. Semiconductor
components benefit from Moore's Law, an observed principle which states
that, for a given price, semiconductor functionality doubles every two years.
While consumer electronics continues in its trend of convergence,
combining elements of many products, consumers face different decisions
when purchasing. There is an ever increasing need to keep product
information updated and comparable, for the consumer to make an
informed choice. Style, price, specification, and performance are all relevant.
There is a gradual shift towards e-commerce web-storefronts.
Many products include Internet connectivity using technologies such as Wi-
Fi, Bluetooth, EDGE or Ethernet. Products not traditionally associated with
computer use (such as TVs or Hi-Fi equipment) now provide options to
connect to the Internet or to a computer using a home network to provide
access to digital content. The desire for high-definition (HD) content has led
the industry to develop a number of technologies, such
as WirelessHD or ITU-T G.hn, which are optimized for distribution of HD
content between consumer electronic devices in a home.
Manufacturing
Many consumer electronics are built in China, due to maintenance cost,
availability of materials, quality, and speed as opposed to other countries
such as the United States. Cities such as Shenzhen have become important
production centres for the industry, attracting many consumer electronics
companies such as Apple.
-
15
Electronic component
An electronic component is any basic discrete device or physical entity in an
electronic system used to affect electrons or their associated fields.
Electronic components are mostly industrial products, available in a
singular form and are not to be confused with electrical elements, which are
conceptual abstractions representing idealized electronic components.
Software development
Consumer electronics such as personal computers use various types of
software. Embedded software is used within some consumer electronics,
such as mobile phones. This type of software may be embedded within the
hardware of electronic devices. Some consumer electronics include software
that is used on a personal computer in conjunction with electronic devices,
such as camcorders and digital cameras, and third-party software for such
devices also exists.
Standardization
Some consumer electronics adhere to protocols, such as connection
protocols "to high speed bi-directional signals". In telecommunications, a
communications protocol is a system of digital rules for data exchange
within or between computers.
-
CHAPTER: - 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
-
16
Anisimova Tatiana Anatolevena (2007) has examined the effects of
corporate brand creation and its impact on consumer behavior for
consumer durables. An absolute in-depth analysis with 80 pages
questionnaire has been executed with the help of seven point likers scale.
Various variables like corporate activities, corporate associations, corporate
values, corporate personality, technology, advancement and technology
sophistication has been into consideration. An attempt of establishing co-
relation between corporate marketing with consumer perception has been
made and to certain extent it has been established. The study clearly
reflects that corporate activities and
Practices play a very vital role in creating corporate brand which ultimately
convert into consumer brand loyalty. The result shows that there is direct
relationship between corporate activities and corporate image association in
the consumers memory and consumer loyalty. Furthermore, attitudinal and
behavioral loyalty can be increased through enhancing consumer personal
representation, in the brand communication and consumer experience. Core
values which are reflected in the mission and vision of the organisation also
having impact in consumer image about the corporate as well as brand. An
important implication therefore is that beyond conventional marketing mix
consumer durable manufacturers should raise consumer awareness of their
core values an organizational culture. Lastly, it shows the result in the form
of clear cut relationship between brand functionality and consumer
evaluation of durable products.
-
17
Bhagaban Das, Mohanty Sangeeta, Sahil Nikhil (2008) reveals that
television brand selection is very complex process, which is highly
depending upon word of mouth publicity and additional information
available for brand or product. On the basis of survey of 80 respondents it
was found that sound quality and brand image are the leading factors taken
into account by consumers. Surprisingly, there is no impact of sales
promotion to in the form of discount or gift or any other scheme. Durability
of the product, in-built stabilizer for protecting television from voltage
change and nearby dealer are secondary factors in selecting television
brands. The conclusion has been 195 obtained with factor analysis. Good
brand image is the ultimate criteria across all the sections. It is suggested
by them that offering free direct to home connection might be most effective
sales promotion tool.
Bijapurkar Rama (2007) has nicely explained the concept of bottom of
pyramid with reference to Indian consumers. The size of bottom of pyramid
market in India is very large and one cant afford to ignore them in any
cases it makes one third of the total consumption expenses and one fifth of
the savings. The purchasing power of the rural consumer of India is low but
its size makes it. Still in India a dollar per day is to be considered as
sufficient amount for the average family of India. The affordability of the
chief wage earner of the family may be extended to second hand mobile and
television set and small dwelling in shot time of six months. Hence the
affordability is not the prime issue for rural consumers. Marketers are
required to go for sensible investment in the appropriate brand building and
in creation of brand loyalty by finding right business models for urban and
rural poor or bottom of the pyramid customers. The rural consumers are
showing very positive and favorable changes in their attitude after
liberalization which responsible due to enhancement of educational level.
The rural consumers are poor but not backward. As the rural consumers
-
18
are becoming struggling and aspiring for better life and stretch them for
better environment.
Broadbridge Adelina and Marshall Julie (1995), conducted a study of
consumer complaint behaviour with 124 respondents reveals that just 4%
respondents are satisfied with the complaint resolution system of consumer
durable companies. Nearly 1/3rdare satisfied with the efforts made by 196
marketers, but 44% are of the opinion that marketers are not taking
appropriate action for resolving complaints of consumer. Consumer
complaint behaviour having direct impact on store patronage and affects
stores loyalty. Surprisingly, an organization can get back 75 consumers to
their store after hearing and solving their complaint once again. Consumer
complaint behaviour is supposed to be a part of consumer relationship
management and retailer is also to be treated as most important mediator
for managing consumer complaint issues tactfully. Consumer complaint
behaviour is basically a hidden cost in the form of negative word of mouth
in case of dis satisfied work, which leads to alternate store as to the present
point of purchase. The study suggests that there should be proper
complaint management system which should give data about total number
of complaints, nature of complaint, timing of resolving, resolving ratio and
repetition of complaint. Marketing is based on exchange of mutually
beneficial values. Companies must strive to ensure that consumer perceives
that he has been fairly treated. Hence, firm must communicate, deliver and
share added value by way of excellent services. Majority of respondents
believes that electrical goods were essential rather than luxury item. Hence,
after sales service and complaints, should be resolved at the earliest.
-
19
Chavala (2001) depicts the rural consumers relation towards promotion
mix and brand building aspects. The marketing communication should be
utilized for the brand awareness rather than the sales promotion. The
complete different use of integrated marketing communication has been
sought by him who ultimately leads to brand loyalty. Marketing
communication for the rural market will be effective in short run as tactic
but 197 cant be treated as strategy for creating better brand image in the
mind of rural consumers. Consumers perception of alternative brands in
the market place is depending upon the amount of available information
about the brand. Brand information is highly depending upon three sources
viz. Marketer dominated communication channels, Consumer Dominated
communication channels and Neutral channel of communication. His study
showed that there is great impact of marketers dominated communication
channel and it plays very vital role in creating brand preference. Consumers
past information is playing very vital role in brand perception for durable
products.
Dr. Agrawal Manish (2006), has conducted the consumer buying behaviour
process in rural market of Bareli District of U.P. which reveals that lack of
electricity in many rural areas of Bareli District act as barrier to consumer
durables and marketers alteration in the product cannot play any
significant role in adopting household. Decision for the consumer durable
brands is dominated by the male member of the family as well as retailers
opinion plays very important role in such. Television is proved as most
influencer for creating awareness amongst rural consumer. Surprisingly,
local newspapers and magazines play very important role in making
consumer aware about the product. Price and the size of the product are
most influencing variable affecting purchase decision of consumers. District
level town where more assortment and variety is available for consumer
durables is least preferred for point of purchase.
-
20
Hundal B.S. and Anand (2008), examines the perception of the consumer
towards promotional schemes for consumer durables with the help of
primary data from 299 respondents of rural and 297 from urban areas,
whose monthly earnings exceeds Rs.10,000/- with F-Test and Z-Test. The
study reveals that replacement is the key factor for converting potential
consumer into actual consumer in case of rural respondents. But, rural
consumers are more concerned about repair and maintenance of the
consumer durables. Hence, after sales service in case of rural area emerges
significant promotional measure but could not be entertained by marketers
due to poor infrastructure. In case of urban consumers, off seasonal
benefits is also proved to be imp active as to their counterpart in the rural
area. Festive offer is highly waited sales promotion tool in the rural area as
the harvesting activity in the farm provides liquidity to the farmers and
other rural population. Perhaps, installment purchase and O% scheme
seems very promising tool in urban, which indirectly suggests that
affordability is not the constraint of rural areas, but, it is constraint of entire
market. Customer relationship management practice is extremely difficult in
rural areas. Both the groups like free gift scheme along with consumer
durables, but it is assumed to be a routine one along with other sales
promotion tools.
-
CHAPTER: - 3
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
-
21
1) Problem Statement :
This research has conducted to know the comparative study of Samsung
and Micromax tablet in varachha region.
Now-a days uses of tablet increases so company tries to know
comparative potentiality of the users and thats why.
The topic is A Comparative study of Samsung and Micromax tablet in
varachha region.
2) Research objective :
Primary objective:
To know the users preference towards comparative study of Samsung
and Micromax tablet in varachha region.
Secondary objective:
To know which kind of prices prefer by users.
To know the different criteria that the users undertake while buying
the tablet.
3) Research Design :
The researcher used descriptive Research design because the researcher
directly fills the questionnaire from users who are using tablets.
4) Data collection method :
Primary Data:
In this study primary data has used and it will be collected by using
questionnaire.
Secondary Data:
The researcher has collect secondary data from internet and
references from library.
-
22
5) Sampling Design :
The researcher has use non-probability convenience sampling for
selecting the sample, because researcher chooses the sample as per their
convenience.
6) Sample Size :
A sample of 200 users taken on the basis of convenience.
7) Sample unit :
The users has contacted for collecting data.
8) Research tools applied :
The researcher used tables and charts for data representation as will
make easy to understand for others.
9) Limitation of survey :
The analysis and conclusion made by researcher as per their limited
understanding and there may be some variation in actual situation.
Limited area covered.
The respondents personal bias may be affect which is uncontrollable.
-
CHAPTER: - 4
DATA ANALYSIS
-
23
1. Which tablet do you have?
Interpretation:
From the above chart it is interpreted that 85 people out of 200 respondents
are using have Samsung tablet and 115 people out of 200 respondents are
using and have Micromax tablet.
So it seems that majority users are using Micromax tablet and Micromax
Company covers the large market than the Samsung Company on the bases
of tablet.
-
24
2. Since how long have you been using this tablet?
Interpretation:
Samsung: -Form the above chart it is interpreted that 28 respondents are
using Samsung tablet for less than 6 months since, 24 respondents are
using for more than 6 month and less than 1 year, 14 respondents are
using for more than 1 year and less than 2 year and last 19 respondents out
of 85 are using for more than 2 year.
Micromax: -From the above chart it is interpreted that 44 respondents are
using Micromax tablet for less than 6 months since, 44 respondents are
using for more than 6 month and less than 1 year, 19 respondents are
using for more than 1 year and less than 2 year and last 8 respondents out
of 115 are using for more than 2 year.
So that it seems the more users are using since less than 6 month and than
1 year Micromax tablet and Samsung tablet users are using since6 month
to 1 year but less than micromax tablet.
-
25
3. How did you come to know about this tablet?
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 18 respondent are
came to know about Samsung tablet from newspaper, 1 respondent is came
to know from magazine, 24 respondent are came to know from television,
18 respondent are from friends, 17 respondent are from internet and 7
respondents out of 85 came to know from relatives.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 32 respondent are
came to know about Micromax tablet from newspaper, 14 respondent are
came to know from magazine, 14 respondent are came to know from
television, 38 respondent are from friends, 11 respondent are from
internet and 6 respondents out of 115 came to know from relatives.-
So the above interpretation says that Samsung and Micromax tablet users
are came to aware bout it from friends, television, and news paper.
-
26
4. Would you like to use the tablet services in future?
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 80 respondents are
replied positively to use the Samsung tablet service in future and 5
respondents replied negatively towards Samsung tablet service for future
use.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 95 respondents are
positively replied to use Micromax tablet for future use and 20 respondents
replied negatively towards Micromax tablet service for future use.
That above chart shows and interpretation express the majority users the do
not used in future service of Samsung tablet and Micromax tablet users is
used in future service than the Samsung tablet.
So the change in future service it will be change in present time quality of
service, facilities and sales after service and also the users is prefers the on
the spot service it is.
-
27
5. Which tablet do you find more advances in overall specification?
Interpretation:
From the above chart it is interpreted that 85 people out of 200 respondents
are less find advances in overall specification on Samsung tablet and 115
people out of 200 respondents are more find advances in overall
specification on Micromax tablet.
So it seems that more find advances in overall specification on micromax
tablet.
-
28
6. Does the tablet you own meets your desire?
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 59 respondent are
replied positively to fulfill the Samsung tablet own meets our desire and 26
respondents replied negatively towards Samsung tablet does not fulfill own
meets our desire for the used to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 91 respondents are
positively replied to fulfill the Micromax tablet for own meets our desire and
24 respondents replied negatively towards Micromax tablet does not fulfill
own meets our desire for the used to Micromax tablet.
So the some respondent response give the some meets and desire is fulfill
and some not fulfill the meets and desire but more fulfill micromax tablet
own meets and desire than the Samsung tablet.
And also the Samsung company prepare tablet in advance new technology
through and less problem face so the prefer and fulfill the own meets and
desire.
-
29
7. from our choosen tablet, answer the following.
Reasonable price
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 43 respondent are
strong agree, 25 respondent are agree, 12 respondent are neutral, 2
respondent are disagree, 3 respondent are strong disagree to reasonable
price for users interested to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 69 respondent are
strong agree, 33 respondent are agree, 8 respondent are neutral, 2
respondent are disagree, 3 respondent are strong disagree to reasonable
price for users interested to Micromax tablet.
So it seems the more respondent is strong agree in reasonable price of
Micromax tablet than the Samsung tablet it will become Samsung company
have price down and reasonable so the respondent are prefers the price
Samsung tablet.
-
30
Long battery life
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 21 respondent are
strong agree, 36 respondent are agree, 16 respondent are neutral, 7
respondent are disagree, 5 respondent are strong disagree to long battery
life for users used to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 19 respondent are
strong agree, 56 respondent are agree, 25 respondent are neutral, 10
respondent are disagree, 5 respondent are strong disagree to long battery
life for users used to Micromax tablet.
So the majority respondent is agreeing on the bases of long battery life in
Micromax tablet than the Samsung tablet. So Samsung company adopt the
long battery power in using tablet and solve problem face by the issue of
battery life and provide big power battery.
-
31
Less hang problem
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 19 respondent are
strong agree, 25respondentare agree, 27 respondent are neutral, 10
respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to less hand
problem for users used to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 12 respondent are
strong agree, 31respondentare agree, 67 respondent are neutral, 11
respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to less hang
problem for users used to Micromax tablet.
So that it seems the more respondent are neutral on the bases of less hang
problem in Micromax tablet because it provide optimum facilities in less
arising hang problem. If the Samsung company tablet prepare in do not
arising hang problem so it prefer and also the low cost of price.
-
32
Stylish look
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 27 respondent are
strong agree, 27 respondent are agree, 26 respondent are neutral, 3
respondent are disagree, 2 respondent are strong disagree to stylish look
for users like to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 22 respondent are
strong agree, 46 respondent are agree, 21 respondent are neutral, 18
respondent are disagree, 5 respondent are strong disagree to stylish look
for users like to Micromax tablet.
So the more respondents is agree on bases of stylish look in Micromax
tablet because it provide more look option and Samsung company provide
less look in tablet if the company provide stylish look and change the look
and prepare the more attractive than the Micromax tablet it the agree of
users.
-
33
More colors option
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 21 respondent are
strong agree, 28 respondent are agree, 18 respondent are neutral, 14
respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to more colors
option for users interested to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 37 respondent are
strong agree, 30 respondent are agree, 31 respondent are neutral, 9
respondent are disagree, 8 respondent are strong disagree to more colors
option for users interested to Micromax tablet.
So it seems the majority respondent is agree and strong agree of more colors
option in micromax tablet and if the Samsung company make the attractive
colors tablet prepare and provide more colors option it the agree and strong
agree.
-
34
Better after sales service
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 18 respondent are
strong agree, 22respondentare agree, 26 respondent are neutral, 11
respondent are disagree, 8 respondent are strong disagree to better after
sales service for users like to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 37 respondent are
strong agree, 30 respondent are agree, 31 respondent are neutral, 9
respondent are disagree, 8 respondent are strong agree to better after sales
service for users used to Micromax tablet.
So the more respondent are agree and neutral of better after sales service in
Micromax tablet and Samsung company is better after sales service do not
provide of quality bases if the change the service it the maker of service time
waiting is low and return in few days.
-
35
Long durability
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 27 respondent are
strong agree, 30 respondent are agree, 14 respondent are neutral, 9
respondent are disagree, 5 respondent are strong disagree to long durability
for users used to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 31 respondent are
strong agree, 30 respondent are agree, 36 respondent are neutral, 13
respondent are disagree, 5 respondent are strong disagree to long durability
for users used to Micromax tablet.
So the more respondent is agreeing, strong agree and neutral on the bases
of long durability in Micromax tablet and Samsung tablet is not durable in
long time than the Micromax tablet.
If the Samsung Company have use in long durable technical material then
prepare tablet it is the preferable.
-
36
Good touch quality
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 32 respondent are
strong agree, 27 respondent are agree, 16 respondent are neutral, 7
respondent are disagree, 3 respondent are strong disagree to good touch
quality for users interested to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 31 respondent are
strong agree, 34 respondent are agree, 30 respondent are neutral, 16
respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to good touch
quality for users interested to Micromax tablet.
So it seem that the respondent is agree and strong agree on the bases of
good touch quality in Micromax tablet and less agree and strong agree in
Samsung tablet.
If the Samsung company maker the smooth and speedily operate touch
quality gives it is the users is like.
-
37
Strong processor
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 33 respondent are
strong agree, 22 respondent are agree, 20 respondent are neutral, 6
respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to strong
processor for users used to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 21 respondent are
strong agree, 34 respondent are agree, 41 respondent are neutral, 11
respondent are disagree, respondent are strong disagree to strong
processor for users used to Micromax tablet.
So the majority respondent is agree and neutral of the strong processor in
Micromax tablet and Samsung tablet is less than the Micromax tablet.
If the Samsung Company prepares the tablet in high quality of processor in
different company so the response is come in strong.
-
38
Good Bluetooth system.
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 26 respondent are
strong agree, 31 respondent are agree, 21 respondent are neutral, 5
respondent are disagree, 2 respondent are strong disagree to good
Bluetooth system for users interested to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 29 respondent are
strong agree, 42 respondent are agree, 21 respondent are neutral, 18
respondent are disagree, 5 respondent are strong agree to good Bluetooth
system for users interested to Micromax tablet.
So it seems that the more respondent is agree on the bases of good
Bluetooth system in micromax tablet and if the Samsung company maker
the speedily workable Bluetooth system it the tablet is more agree.
-
39
Powerful gsm /cdma system
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 21 respondent are
strong agree, 27 respondent are agree, 22 respondent are neutral, 11
respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to powerful
gsm/cdma system for users like to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 37 respondent are
strong agree, 23 respondent are agree, 22 respondent are neutral, 19
respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to gsm/cdma
system for users like to Micromax tablet.
So the respondent is agreed and strong agrees of powerful gsm/cdma
system in Micromax tablet and Samsung do not provide in powerful system
because not given the option.
If provide cdma option it the more respondent is agree because cdma system
is less costly.
-
40
Big ram capacity
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 24 respondent are
strong agree, 21 respondent are agree, 17 respondent are neutral, 14
respondent are disagree, 9 respondent are strong disagree to big ram
capacity for users used to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 26 respondent are
strong agree, 34 respondent are agree, 30 respondent are neutral, 17
respondent are disagree, 8 respondent are strong disagree to big ram
capacity for users used to Micromax tablet.
So it seems that the Micromax tablet is provide big ram capacity in less cost
and if Samsung tablet is provide big ram capacity in less cost because users
used speedily operate of tablet so the it agree.
-
41
Large memory storage
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 22 respondent are
strong agree, 25 respondent are agree, 15 respondent are neutral, 7
respondent are disagree, 6 respondent are strong disagree to large memory
storage for users uses to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 26 respondent are
strong agree, 45 respondent are agree, 21 respondent are neutral, 14
respondent are disagree, 9 respondent are strong disagree to large memory
storage for users uses to Micromax tablet.
So the majority respondent is agree on the bases of large memory storage in
Micromax tablet and If the Samsung company provide large storage because
present time users is prefers the large memory storage.
-
42
More Application support
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 32 respondent are
strong agree, 29 respondent are agree, 14 respondent are neutral, 7
respondent are disagree, 3 respondent are strong disagree to more
application support for users interested to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 36 respondent are
strong agree, 33 respondent are agree, 22 respondent are neutral, 16
respondent are disagree, 8respondent are strong agree to more application
support for users interested in Micromax tablet.
So it seems that the Micromax tablet provide more application support in
strong agree of respondent.
If the Samsung Company is gives more application support and additional
application provide it the strong agree in respondent this tablet.
-
43
High quality camera
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 36 respondent are
strong agree, 26 respondent are agree, 11 respondent are neutral, 9
respondent are disagree, 3 respondent are strong disagree to high quality
camera for users like to Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 35 respondent are
strong agree, 32 respondent are agree, 23 respondent are neutral, 12
respondent are disagree, 3 respondent are strong disagree to high quality
camera for users like to Micromax tablet.
So the strong agree of the high quality camera result in micromax tablet
respondent and if the Samsung Company make now the high quality
camera in low cost in this tablet it is the response they came high.
-
44
8. Personal information.
1. Occupation.
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpretedthat10 respondent are
business occupation bases, 64 respondent are students occupation bases, 8
respondent are services occupation bases, 3 respondent are others
occupation bases to users interest Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 26 respondent are
business occupation bases, 65 respondent are students occupation bases,
20 respondent are services occupation bases, 4 respondent are others
occupation bases to users interest Micromax tablet.
So it seems the student occupation bases mostly used of Micromax tablet
than the Samsung tablet.
-
45
2. Age.
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that57 respondent are less
than 20 age, 25 respondent are more than 20 age and less than 30 age, 3
respondent are more than 30 age to users used Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted age that 51 respondent
are less than 20, 57 respondent are more than 20 and less than 30, 7
respondent are more than 30 to users used Micromax tablet.
So the below the 20 age users used in majority both Samsung and
micromax tablet but less difference in more users is Samsung tablet and
less users in Micromax tablet.
Because educated more uses this both tablet below the 30 age users.
-
46
3. Monthly income.
Interpretation:
Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 70 respondent are
Monthly income less than Rs.10000, 9 respondent are more than Rs.10000
and less than Rs.20000 monthly income, 5 respondent are more than
Rs.20000 and less than Rs.30000 monthly income,1 respondent are more
than Rs.30000 Monthly income to users used Samsung tablet.
Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 82 respondent are
monthly income less than 10000rs., 19 respondent are more than
10000rs.and less than 20000rs.monthaly income,7 respondent are more
than 20000rs.and less than 30000rs.monthaly income,7 respondent are
more than 30000rs.monthaly income to users used Micromax tablet.
So it seems that the below 10000rs. Monthly income users used tablet but
more users is Micromax and less Samsung tablet. If Samsung company
price fall it is the more interested buy this table.
-
CHAPTER: - 5
FINDING
-
47
According to my research that majority respondent have and used to
Micromax tablet and minor respondent used to Samsung tablet.
It is found that majority respondent using Micromax tablet since 6
month - 1 year and Samsung tablet 6 month - 1 year.
It is found that majority respondent come to know about the
Micromax tablet from newspaper and friends & Samsung tablet from
the television, newspaper and friends.
According to my research that more respondent like to use the tablet
services in future in both Samsung and Micromax tablet.
It is research that majority respondent do you find more advances in
overall specification to Micromax tablet and minor respondent do not
find advances in overall specification to Samsung tablet.
It is research that more respondent the fulfill own meets your desire
to both Samsung and Micromax tablet and minor respondent do not
fulfills to both tablet.
It is found that majority respondent agree, strong agree and neutral in
reasonable price, long battery life, less hang problem, stylish look,
more colors option, better sales after service, good Bluetooth system,
good touch quality, strong processor, big ram capacity, powerful
gsm/cdma system, more application support and high quality camera
to both Samsung and Micromax tablet.
According to my research that occupation bases student majority
respondent do have and used both Samsung and Micromax tablet and
then business, service and others.
It is research that below the age 20 year bases more student have
and used both Samsung and Micromax tablet and then more than age
20 year.
It is research that below that 10000rs. Monthly income bases more
respondents do you have and used both Samsung and Micromax
tablet and then more than 10000rs.
-
48
It is found that majority respondents are satisfied to the various
factors like:-
After analysis on various factors it is found that, customer
satisfaction rate for Samsung tablet is more than Micromax tablet.
It is found the most of the respondents are student.
-
CHAPTER: - 6
CONCLUSION
-
49
Now days in Surat city people are buy the tablet for raising the status in
society so people will go for stylish and status tablet like Micromax brand.
There is also big market scope for stylish and economic tablet in
communication and personal uses so, industry increased continuously so
company should concentrate on that segment.
Thus after all the above important discussion it can conclude that Samsung
and Micromax managers have to sale tablet in a strict and efficient Manner.
The respondents prefer Micromax tablet branded vehicles rather than
Samsung tablet. For improvement end Samsung tablet most put more
efforts towards creating price and features with higher displacement
features which are more create higher power, similar or better than that of
Micromax range of tablet.
And for Micromax tablet, there should be efforts towards Providing more
quality commitment relationship with present and prospect customer.
-
CHAPTER: - 7
BIBLIOGRAPHY
-
WEBSITE:
http://in.reuters.com/finance/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=00
5930.K
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung
http://www.micromaxinfo.com/resourceContent/Micromax-
Mobiles-company-profile-final.pdf
-
CHAPTER: - 8
ANNEXURE
-
Questionnaire
I am GOTI NIKUNJ L. Student J.D.G Commerce Collage And Shree Swami
Attmanand Saraswasti Collage Of Management Surat. I am doing research
Comperative Study of Samsung And Micromax Tablet can you spend
five minutes to answers the following questions this study is for attending
purpose only no. information shall be disclosed anywhere.
Part-A
1. Which Tablet do you have?
Samsung Micromax
2. Since how long have you been using this tablet?
Less than 6 month
More than 6 month & Less than 1 year
More than 1 year & Less than 2 year
More than 2 year
3. How did you come to know about this tablet?
Newspaper Magazines
Television Friends
Internet Relatives
4. Would you like to use the tablet services in future?
Yes No
-
5. Which tablet do you find more advances in overall specifications?
Samsung Micromax
6. Does the tablet you own meets your desire?
Yes No
7. Choose one of tablet as per there features which one is best?
Features
Strong
agree
Agree Neutral Dis
agree
Strong
dis
agree
Reasonable Price
Long battery life
Less hang problem
Stylish look
More colors option
Better after sales service
Long durability
Good touch quality
Strong processor
Good Bluetooth system
Powerful gsm/cdma
system
Big RAM capacity
Large memory storage
More application support
High camera quality
-
Part-B
Name: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Contact: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Occupation:
Business Student Service Other_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Monthly Income: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Age: _ _ _ _ _