12 bba 43

68
A WINTER TRAINING REPORT ON COMPERATIVE STUDY OF SAMSUNG AND MICROMAX TABLET IN VARACHHA REGION SUBMITTED BY: NIKUNJ GOTI L. (12BBA43) GUIDED BY: MR. RAKESH PATEL BBA PROGRAMME (YEAR 2014-2015) SHREE J. D. GABANI COMMERCE COLLEGE AND SHREE SWAMI ATMANAND SARASWATI COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT, VNSGU, SURAT

description

bba projects

Transcript of 12 bba 43

  • A

    WINTER TRAINING REPORT

    ON

    COMPERATIVE STUDY OF SAMSUNG AND

    MICROMAX TABLET IN VARACHHA REGION

    SUBMITTED BY:

    NIKUNJ GOTI L.

    (12BBA43)

    GUIDED BY:

    MR. RAKESH PATEL

    BBA PROGRAMME

    (YEAR 2014-2015)

    SHREE J. D. GABANI COMMERCE COLLEGE AND

    SHREE SWAMI ATMANAND SARASWATI COLLEGE OF

    MANAGEMENT,

    VNSGU, SURAT

  • I

    CERTIFICATE

    This is to certify that the winter project report has been prepaid by NIKUNJ

    GOTI L. (12BBA43), under my guidance and supervision. This project embodied

    the result of her work and is of standard expected from a candidate for the

    degree of BBA.

    The report submitted towards the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the

    degree of BBA has been found satisfactory.

    Name of Principal Name of Guide

    Mr. P.R Patel Mr. Rakesh Patel

    Date:

    Place: Surat

  • II

    DECLARATION

    I here declare that this winter project report submitted to SHREE J.D.G

    COMMERCE COLLEGE & SHREE SWAMI ATMANAND SARASWATI

    COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT, SURAT, in the fulfillment of requirement of

    B.B.A. degree. The project is result of my own work carried out during Jan-

    Feb 2014.

    This project report is entirely an outcome of my own efforts and has not

    been previously submitted to any other university or institute for any other

    examination and for any other purpose by any other person.

    Date: Nikunj goti l.

    Place: Surat (12BBA43)

  • III

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    Today in the world of competition training is needed to overcome shortage of

    skill and knowledgeable person as well as for the personnel development

    and career advancement. It is a great opportunities for me to do such type

    of training which help me in my career development and providing more

    knowledge about working process of organization.

    I am also thankful to Mr. P.R. Patel (Principle of collage) and Mr. Rakesh

    Patel (Guide) for his valuable advice. I am also thankful all staff of Shree

    swami Atman and Saraswati collage of Management and information

    science, Surat for their co-ordination.

    Last but not least I am also thankful to my friends who supported me

    during the deed of the project work.

  • IV

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Firstly, I have included certain things like industry details, Company details

    like history of Samsung and Micromax tablet. It is one of the fastest growing

    industries in the world.

    The objective behind preparing the report has been mentioned in brief and

    the main objective is to study comparatives study of Samsung and

    Micromax tablet in varachha region.

    There are certain limitation of the project report like shortage of time, given

    for conducting the market survey is limited and the limitation of response

    decreased.

    The descriptive research design is use in my project. It covers the buying

    guide for Samsung and Micromax tablet product providers. I have user rank

    in open ended and close ended question. So, that respondent does not find

    it boring information is collected by conducting personal visit of 200

    respondents.

    The report includes seven chapters.

    The first chapter is industry profile. It includes industrial detail and major

    players of the industry.

    The second chapter is company profile. It includes information and overview

    of Samsung and Micromax tablet product providers.

    The third chapter is literature review. Literature review explains previous

    study on tablet product provided by the tablet company provider. It also

    explains the previous study about the customer preference towards

    Samsung and Micromax tablet product providers.

    The forth chapter is research methodology. Research methodology provides

    information about the sample size, sampling design, sampling unit;

  • V

    research instrument used problem statement, research objective, research

    design, data collection methods and limitation of the study.

    The fifth chapter is data analysis. In it all collected information are analysed

    through Ms Excel and Ms Word, and all the collected information is shown

    through bar chart.

    The sixth chapter is findings. The outcome of the each data is mention

    under this heading.

    The seventh chapter is conclusion. In conclusion mention the overview of

    study. In this, the most of respondents are using the Samsung and

    Micromax tablet product providers. So provider should over come ones

    competition. So, it leads to adding new features, scheme, and periodical

    offers to their products.

  • VI

    TABLE OF CONTENT

    SR NO. TOPIC PAGE NO.

    TITLE PAGE -

    COLLEGE CERTIFICATE I

    DECLARATION II

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT III

    EXECUTIVE SUMMERY IV

    1 INTRODUCTION 1-15

    2 LITERATURE REVIEW 16-20

    3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 21-22

    4 DATA ANALYSIS 23-46

    5 FINDINGS 47-48

    6 CONCLUSION 49

    7 BIBLIOGRAPHY -

    8 ANNEXURE -

  • CHAPTER: - 1

    INTRODUCTION

  • 1

    SAMSUNG COMPANY PROFILE

    Samsung history:

    Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the chief subsidiary of South Korea's giant

    Samsung Group and the largest electronics producer in Asia. Samsung

    Electronics operates four main divisions including Digital Media,

    Semiconductors, Information & Communications, and Home Appliances.

    The company sells televisions, video and audio equipment computers and

    related products phones, cellular phones, and fax machines home

    appliances semiconductors network-related products factory automation

    products fiber optics products closed circuit security products motors and

    compressors and solar energy systems. In 2000, Samsung Electronics held

    the leading market position in the code division multiple access (CDMA)

    Handset, DRAM, SRAM, and color monitor markets.

    Samsung Company:

    Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is mainly engaged in the production of

    consumer electronic products. It operates in three business divisions:

    consumer electronics (CE) division, which involves in the color televisions

    (CTVs), monitors, printers, air conditioners, refrigerators, laundry machines

    and others information technology & mobile communications (IM) division,

    which involves in the production of computers, handhold phones (HHPs),

    network systems, digital cameras and others, as well as device solutions

    (DM) division, which is divided into semiconductor and display business

    parts, providing dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), flashes, thin

    film transistor-liquid crystal displays (TFT-LCDs) and others. The Company

    distributes its products within domestic market and to overseas markets.

  • 2

    Product:

    Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. manufactures Consumer Electronics, IT

    and Telecom products. Samsung began operations in India through its

    manufacturing complex located at Noida (UP), which today houses facilities

    for Color Televisions (including 3D, LED and LCD Televisions), Mobile

    Phones, and tablets, Refrigerators, Washing Machines and Split Air

    Conditioners categories. Samsung India's product categories also include

    Slim TVs and Side by Side Refrigerators. The company's head office is based

    in Delhi.

    As a unit of behemoth Samsung Electronics, Samsung India Electronics

    works to keep its customers connected through its growing products

    portfolio. It develops and manufactures a wide variety of consumer

    electronics devices, including DVD players, plasma televisions, digital

    cameras, personal computers, color monitors, LCD panels, printers, and

    computer peripherals. The New Delhi-based company also makes and

    markets semiconductors, such as DRAMs, SRAMs, and flash memory

    products. Ranging from wireless phones to networking switches, Samsung

    India produces communications devices, as well. The electronics firm counts

    consumers, corporations, schools, and government agencies among its

    primary customers.

    Samsung tablet market share:

    Tablet market share of Samsung has increased to 22.2 percent in Q3 2014

    from 19 percent in Q2 2014.

  • 3

    SAMSUNG COMPANY INDUSTRY PROFILE

    Samsung Town, Seoul

    Industry Conglomerate

    Founded 1938

    Founders Lee Byung-chul

    Headquarters Seoul, South Korea

    Area served Worldwide

    Key people Lee Kun-hee

    (Chairman of Samsung Electronics)

  • 4

    Products Apparel, chemicals, consumer electronics, electronic components,

    medical equipment, precision instruments, semiconductors,

    ships, telecommunications equipment

    Services Advertising, construction, entertainment, financial services, hospitality,

    information and communications technology services, medical services,

    retail

    Revenue US$ 327 billion (2013)

    Net income US$ 30.1 billion (2013)

    Total assets US$ 100.4 billion (2013)

    Total equity US$ 70.3 billion (2013)

    Employees 427,000 (2013)

    Subsidiaries Samsung Electronics

    Samsung Life Insurance

    Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance

    Samsung Heavy Industries

    Samsung C&T

    Samsung SDS

    Samsung Tec win

    Samsung Motors(Renault-Samsung Motors(cars division)) etc.

    Website Samsung.com

  • 5

    Samsung is a South Korean multinational conglomerate company

    headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous

    subsidiaries and affiliated businesses, most of them united under

    the Samsung brand, and are the largest South Korea.

    Samsung was founded by Lee Byung-chul in 1938 as a trading company.

    Over the next three decades, the group diversified into areas including food

    processing, textiles, insurance, securities and retail. Samsung entered

    the electronics industry in the late 1960s and the construction and

    shipbuilding industries in the mid-1970s; these areas would drive its

    subsequent growth. Following Lee's death in 1987, Samsung was separated

    into four business group Samsung Group, Shinseki Group, CJ

    Group and Hanson Group. Since 1990s, Samsung has increasingly

    globalized its activities, and electronics, particularly mobile phones and

    semiconductors, have become its most important source of income.

    Notable Samsung industrial subsidiaries include Samsung

    Electronics (the world's largest information technology company measured

    by 2012 revenues, and 4th in market value), Samsung Heavy Industries (the

    world's 2nd-largest shipbuilder measured by 2010 revenues), and Samsung

    Engineering and Samsung C&T (respectively the world's 13th and 36th-

    largest construction companies).

    Samsung has a powerful influence on South Korea's economic development,

    politics, media and culture, and has been a major driving force behind the

    "Miracle on the Han River". Its affiliate companies produce around a fifth of

    South Korea's total exports. Samsung's revenue was equal to 17% of South

    Korea's $1,082 billion GDP.

    In 2013, Samsung began construction on building the world's largest mobile

    phone factory in the Thai Nguyen province of Vietnam. Samsung has been

    able to achieve the largest market share of nearly 31% in the global

    smartphone segment, as of 2013.

  • 6

    Samsung industry operation profile:

    Samsung comprises around 80 companies. It is highly diversified, with

    activities in areas including construction, consumer electronics, financial

    services, shipbuilding, and medical services.

    Subsidiaries and affiliates:

    As of April 2011, the Samsung Group comprised 59 unlisted companies and

    19 listed companies, all of which had their primary listing on the Korea

    Exchange.

    Principal subsidiary and affiliate companies of Samsung

    include:

    Ace Digitech:

    Ace Digitech is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.

    Cheil Industries:

    Cheil Industries is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.

    Samsung Card:

    Samsung Card is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.

    Samsung SDS:

    Samsung SDS is a multinational IT Service company headquartered in

    Seoul. It was founded in March 1985. Its principal activity is the providing

    IT system (ERP, IT Infrastructure, IT Consulting, IT Outsourcing, Data

    Center). Samsung SDS is the Korea's largest IT service company. It achieved

    total revenues of 6,105.9 billion won.

    Samsung C & T Corporation:

    Samsung C&T Corporation is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.

  • 7

    Samsung Electro-Mechanics:

    Samsung Electro-Mechanics, established in 1973 as a manufacturer of key

    electronic components, is headquartered in Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South

    Korea. It is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.

    Samsung Electronics:

    Samsung Electronics is a multinational electronics and information

    technology company headquartered in Suwon and the flagship company of

    the Samsung Group. Its products include air conditioners, computers,

    digital televisions, liquid crystal displays (including thin (TFTs) and active-

    matrix organic light-emitting diodes (AMOLEDs)), mobile phones, monitors,

    printers, refrigerators, semiconductors, and telecommunications

    networking equipment. It is the world's largest mobile phone maker by unit

    sales in the first quarter of 2012; with a global market share of 25.4%.It is

    also the world's second-largest semiconductor maker by 2011 revenues

    (after Intel).

    Samsung Electronics is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.

    Samsung Engineering:

    Samsung Engineering is a multinational construction company

    headquartered in Seoul. It was founded in January 1969. Its principal

    activity is the construction of oil refining plants; upstream oil and gas

    facilities; petrochemical plants and gas plants; steel making plants; power

    plants; water treatment facilities; and other infrastructure. It achieved total

    revenues of 9,298.2 billion won (US$8.06 billion) in 2011.

    Samsung Engineering is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.

  • 8

    Samsung Ever land:

    Samsung Ever land engages in an array of services closely associated with

    the day-to-day lives and business operations of its customers. Its business

    scope covers the three main sectors of Environment & Asset, Food Culture,

    and Resort.

    Since its inception in 1963 and the launch of theme park "Overland" in

    1976, Samsung Ever land has steadily built its presence across the markets

    of golf, building management, food and beverage, energy, and environment.

    Samsung Fine Chemicals:

    Samsung Fine Chemicals is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.

    Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance:

    Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance is a multinational general

    insurance company headquartered in Seoul. It was founded in January

    1952 as Korea Anbo Fire a d Marine Insurance and was renamed Samsung

    Fire & Marine Insurance in December 1993. Samsung Fire & Marine

    Insurance offers services including accident insurance, automobile

    insurance, casualty insurance, fire insurance, liability insurance, marine

    insurance, personal pensions and loans.

    Samsung Fire has been listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange since

    1975.

  • 9

    Samsung Heavy Industries:

    Samsung Heavy Industries is a shipbuilding and engineering company

    headquartered in Seoul. It was founded in August 1974. Its principal

    products are bulk carriers, container vessels, crude oil tankers, cruisers,

    passenger ferries, material handling equipment steel and bridge

    structures. It achieved total revenues of 13,358.6 billion won in 2011 and is

    the world's second-largest shipbuilder by revenues (after Hyundai Heavy

    Industries).

    Samsung Heavy Industries is listed on the Korea Exchange stock-exchange.

    Samsung Life Insurance:

    Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd. is a multinational life insurance company

    headquartered in Seoul. It was founded in March 1957 as Dongbang Life

    Insurance and became an affiliate of the Samsung Group in July

    1963. Samsung Life's principal activity is the provision of individual life

    insurance and annuity products and services.

    Samsung Machine Tools:

    Samsung Machine Tools of America is a national distributor of machines in

    the United States. Samsung GM Machine Tools is the head office of China,

    its SMEC Legal incorporated company.

    Samsung medical center:

    The Samsung Medical Center was founded on November 9, 1994, under the

    philosophy of contributing to improving the nations health through the

    best medical service, advanced medical research, and development of

    outstanding medical personnel". The Samsung Medical Center consists of a

    hospital and a cancer center.

  • 10

    SAMSUNG COMPANY PROFILE

    Micromax history

    The history of Micromax (2011-12 revenue: Rs 1,978 core or Rs 19.78

    billion), which ventured into the mobile phone market in 2008, is one of the

    most fascinating success stories in the Indian consumer electronics

    industry.

    In barely five years, the company has come to occupy the third position (by

    volume) in the mobile handset market in India and is at No. 12 globally.

    It leads the Indian tablet market with a share of 18.4 per cent, ahead of

    veterans Samsung and Apple.

    The Gurgaon-headquartered company owes its success not just to the ticket

    it puts on its products or the speed with which it puts new designs on the

    shelves but to how it has managed these two crucial product inputs by

    leveraging China.

    To be more specific, the labor cost advantage and the production flexibility

    that China offered.

    Micromax Company

    Micromax Informatics Limited is one of the leading consumer electronics

    company in India and the 10th largest mobile phone player in the world.

    Over the past decade, Micromax has pioneered the democratization of

    technology in India by offering affordable innovations through their product

    offerings and removing barriers for large scale adoption of advanced

    technologies. Micromax is currently the 2nd largest smartphone company in

    India. Micromax is a brand which is close to the heart of the youth and

    celebrates the vibrancies of life and empowerment.

  • 11

    Products

    Micromax products have become an extension of the Indian youths lifestyle

    and dynamism. The company has many firsts to its credit when it comes to

    the mobile handset market including the 30-day battery backup, Dual SIM

    Dual Standby phones, QWERTY keypads, universal remote control mobile

    phones, first quad-core budget smart phone etc. The brands product

    portfolio embraces more than 60 models today, ranging from feature rich,

    dual SIM phones, 3G Android smartphones, tablets, LED televisions and

    data cards. Micromax sells around 2.3 million Mobility Devices every month,

    with a presence in more than 560 districts through 1, 25,000 retail outlets

    in India.

    Network & reach

    With sales presence across India and global presence in Russia and SAARC

    markets, the Indian brand is reaching out to the global frontier with

    innovative products that challenge the status quo that Innovation comes

    with a price.

    Micromax tablet market share

    Micromax tablet share dipped 15 percent to 10.9 percent from 14 percent.

  • 12

    MICROMAX COMPANY INDUSTRY PROFILE

    Micromax Informatics Ltd.

    Type Private

    Industry Telecommunications, Consumer

    Founded Delhi, India (29 March 2000)

    Founders Rahul Sharma

    Vikas Jain

    Sumeet Arora

    Rajesh Agarwal

    Headquarters Gurgaon, Haryana, India

    Area served India, Russia, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal

    Key people Sanjay Kapoor (Chairman)

    Vineet Taneja (CEO)

    Shubhodip Pal (CMO)

    Products Mobile phones, smartphones,tablet

    computers, 3GDatacards, LED televisions

    Revenue US$ 2.2 billion (2014)[1]

    Website Micromaxinfo.com

  • 13

    Micromax is an Indian consumer electronics company headquartered

    in Gurgaon, Haryana, India. Micromax started as an IT software company in

    2000 and worked on embedded platforms. It entered the mobile handset

    business, and became one of the largest Indian domestic mobile handsets

    company operating in low cost feature phone segments by 2010.

    Micromax was incorporated as Micromax Informatics Ltd. on 29 March

    2000. They started manufacturing mobile phones in 2008 with a focus on

    low pricing, in order to compete with international brands. Because of the

    issues of power in Dewas , Mohit Gangadhar Sharma saw a phone being

    powered by a truck battery and decided to develop a longer battery

    life. Micromax launched its first phone with a month long battery back-up

    known as X1i. In 2011, Micromax entered the tablet market with the

    Canvas series.

    In 2014, Micromax surpassed Samsung to become the mobile phone

    manufacturer shipping the most number of phones in a single quarter in

    India. On 24 January 2014, Micromax became the first Indian mobile

    company to start sales in Russia.

    Originally, the company sourced all its mobile phones from China. However,

    since April 2014, they have started manufacturing mobile phones and

    tablets at their facility in Rudraprayag, Uttarakhand.

  • 14

    MICROMAX INDUSTRY OPERATION PROFILE

    Television

    One overriding characteristic of consumer electronic products is the trend of

    ever-falling prices. This is driven by gains in manufacturing efficiency

    and automation, lower labor costs as manufacturing has moved to lower-

    wage countries, and improvements in semiconductor design. Semiconductor

    components benefit from Moore's Law, an observed principle which states

    that, for a given price, semiconductor functionality doubles every two years.

    While consumer electronics continues in its trend of convergence,

    combining elements of many products, consumers face different decisions

    when purchasing. There is an ever increasing need to keep product

    information updated and comparable, for the consumer to make an

    informed choice. Style, price, specification, and performance are all relevant.

    There is a gradual shift towards e-commerce web-storefronts.

    Many products include Internet connectivity using technologies such as Wi-

    Fi, Bluetooth, EDGE or Ethernet. Products not traditionally associated with

    computer use (such as TVs or Hi-Fi equipment) now provide options to

    connect to the Internet or to a computer using a home network to provide

    access to digital content. The desire for high-definition (HD) content has led

    the industry to develop a number of technologies, such

    as WirelessHD or ITU-T G.hn, which are optimized for distribution of HD

    content between consumer electronic devices in a home.

    Manufacturing

    Many consumer electronics are built in China, due to maintenance cost,

    availability of materials, quality, and speed as opposed to other countries

    such as the United States. Cities such as Shenzhen have become important

    production centres for the industry, attracting many consumer electronics

    companies such as Apple.

  • 15

    Electronic component

    An electronic component is any basic discrete device or physical entity in an

    electronic system used to affect electrons or their associated fields.

    Electronic components are mostly industrial products, available in a

    singular form and are not to be confused with electrical elements, which are

    conceptual abstractions representing idealized electronic components.

    Software development

    Consumer electronics such as personal computers use various types of

    software. Embedded software is used within some consumer electronics,

    such as mobile phones. This type of software may be embedded within the

    hardware of electronic devices. Some consumer electronics include software

    that is used on a personal computer in conjunction with electronic devices,

    such as camcorders and digital cameras, and third-party software for such

    devices also exists.

    Standardization

    Some consumer electronics adhere to protocols, such as connection

    protocols "to high speed bi-directional signals". In telecommunications, a

    communications protocol is a system of digital rules for data exchange

    within or between computers.

  • CHAPTER: - 2

    LITERATURE REVIEW

  • 16

    Anisimova Tatiana Anatolevena (2007) has examined the effects of

    corporate brand creation and its impact on consumer behavior for

    consumer durables. An absolute in-depth analysis with 80 pages

    questionnaire has been executed with the help of seven point likers scale.

    Various variables like corporate activities, corporate associations, corporate

    values, corporate personality, technology, advancement and technology

    sophistication has been into consideration. An attempt of establishing co-

    relation between corporate marketing with consumer perception has been

    made and to certain extent it has been established. The study clearly

    reflects that corporate activities and

    Practices play a very vital role in creating corporate brand which ultimately

    convert into consumer brand loyalty. The result shows that there is direct

    relationship between corporate activities and corporate image association in

    the consumers memory and consumer loyalty. Furthermore, attitudinal and

    behavioral loyalty can be increased through enhancing consumer personal

    representation, in the brand communication and consumer experience. Core

    values which are reflected in the mission and vision of the organisation also

    having impact in consumer image about the corporate as well as brand. An

    important implication therefore is that beyond conventional marketing mix

    consumer durable manufacturers should raise consumer awareness of their

    core values an organizational culture. Lastly, it shows the result in the form

    of clear cut relationship between brand functionality and consumer

    evaluation of durable products.

  • 17

    Bhagaban Das, Mohanty Sangeeta, Sahil Nikhil (2008) reveals that

    television brand selection is very complex process, which is highly

    depending upon word of mouth publicity and additional information

    available for brand or product. On the basis of survey of 80 respondents it

    was found that sound quality and brand image are the leading factors taken

    into account by consumers. Surprisingly, there is no impact of sales

    promotion to in the form of discount or gift or any other scheme. Durability

    of the product, in-built stabilizer for protecting television from voltage

    change and nearby dealer are secondary factors in selecting television

    brands. The conclusion has been 195 obtained with factor analysis. Good

    brand image is the ultimate criteria across all the sections. It is suggested

    by them that offering free direct to home connection might be most effective

    sales promotion tool.

    Bijapurkar Rama (2007) has nicely explained the concept of bottom of

    pyramid with reference to Indian consumers. The size of bottom of pyramid

    market in India is very large and one cant afford to ignore them in any

    cases it makes one third of the total consumption expenses and one fifth of

    the savings. The purchasing power of the rural consumer of India is low but

    its size makes it. Still in India a dollar per day is to be considered as

    sufficient amount for the average family of India. The affordability of the

    chief wage earner of the family may be extended to second hand mobile and

    television set and small dwelling in shot time of six months. Hence the

    affordability is not the prime issue for rural consumers. Marketers are

    required to go for sensible investment in the appropriate brand building and

    in creation of brand loyalty by finding right business models for urban and

    rural poor or bottom of the pyramid customers. The rural consumers are

    showing very positive and favorable changes in their attitude after

    liberalization which responsible due to enhancement of educational level.

    The rural consumers are poor but not backward. As the rural consumers

  • 18

    are becoming struggling and aspiring for better life and stretch them for

    better environment.

    Broadbridge Adelina and Marshall Julie (1995), conducted a study of

    consumer complaint behaviour with 124 respondents reveals that just 4%

    respondents are satisfied with the complaint resolution system of consumer

    durable companies. Nearly 1/3rdare satisfied with the efforts made by 196

    marketers, but 44% are of the opinion that marketers are not taking

    appropriate action for resolving complaints of consumer. Consumer

    complaint behaviour having direct impact on store patronage and affects

    stores loyalty. Surprisingly, an organization can get back 75 consumers to

    their store after hearing and solving their complaint once again. Consumer

    complaint behaviour is supposed to be a part of consumer relationship

    management and retailer is also to be treated as most important mediator

    for managing consumer complaint issues tactfully. Consumer complaint

    behaviour is basically a hidden cost in the form of negative word of mouth

    in case of dis satisfied work, which leads to alternate store as to the present

    point of purchase. The study suggests that there should be proper

    complaint management system which should give data about total number

    of complaints, nature of complaint, timing of resolving, resolving ratio and

    repetition of complaint. Marketing is based on exchange of mutually

    beneficial values. Companies must strive to ensure that consumer perceives

    that he has been fairly treated. Hence, firm must communicate, deliver and

    share added value by way of excellent services. Majority of respondents

    believes that electrical goods were essential rather than luxury item. Hence,

    after sales service and complaints, should be resolved at the earliest.

  • 19

    Chavala (2001) depicts the rural consumers relation towards promotion

    mix and brand building aspects. The marketing communication should be

    utilized for the brand awareness rather than the sales promotion. The

    complete different use of integrated marketing communication has been

    sought by him who ultimately leads to brand loyalty. Marketing

    communication for the rural market will be effective in short run as tactic

    but 197 cant be treated as strategy for creating better brand image in the

    mind of rural consumers. Consumers perception of alternative brands in

    the market place is depending upon the amount of available information

    about the brand. Brand information is highly depending upon three sources

    viz. Marketer dominated communication channels, Consumer Dominated

    communication channels and Neutral channel of communication. His study

    showed that there is great impact of marketers dominated communication

    channel and it plays very vital role in creating brand preference. Consumers

    past information is playing very vital role in brand perception for durable

    products.

    Dr. Agrawal Manish (2006), has conducted the consumer buying behaviour

    process in rural market of Bareli District of U.P. which reveals that lack of

    electricity in many rural areas of Bareli District act as barrier to consumer

    durables and marketers alteration in the product cannot play any

    significant role in adopting household. Decision for the consumer durable

    brands is dominated by the male member of the family as well as retailers

    opinion plays very important role in such. Television is proved as most

    influencer for creating awareness amongst rural consumer. Surprisingly,

    local newspapers and magazines play very important role in making

    consumer aware about the product. Price and the size of the product are

    most influencing variable affecting purchase decision of consumers. District

    level town where more assortment and variety is available for consumer

    durables is least preferred for point of purchase.

  • 20

    Hundal B.S. and Anand (2008), examines the perception of the consumer

    towards promotional schemes for consumer durables with the help of

    primary data from 299 respondents of rural and 297 from urban areas,

    whose monthly earnings exceeds Rs.10,000/- with F-Test and Z-Test. The

    study reveals that replacement is the key factor for converting potential

    consumer into actual consumer in case of rural respondents. But, rural

    consumers are more concerned about repair and maintenance of the

    consumer durables. Hence, after sales service in case of rural area emerges

    significant promotional measure but could not be entertained by marketers

    due to poor infrastructure. In case of urban consumers, off seasonal

    benefits is also proved to be imp active as to their counterpart in the rural

    area. Festive offer is highly waited sales promotion tool in the rural area as

    the harvesting activity in the farm provides liquidity to the farmers and

    other rural population. Perhaps, installment purchase and O% scheme

    seems very promising tool in urban, which indirectly suggests that

    affordability is not the constraint of rural areas, but, it is constraint of entire

    market. Customer relationship management practice is extremely difficult in

    rural areas. Both the groups like free gift scheme along with consumer

    durables, but it is assumed to be a routine one along with other sales

    promotion tools.

  • CHAPTER: - 3

    RESEARCH

    METHODOLOGY

  • 21

    1) Problem Statement :

    This research has conducted to know the comparative study of Samsung

    and Micromax tablet in varachha region.

    Now-a days uses of tablet increases so company tries to know

    comparative potentiality of the users and thats why.

    The topic is A Comparative study of Samsung and Micromax tablet in

    varachha region.

    2) Research objective :

    Primary objective:

    To know the users preference towards comparative study of Samsung

    and Micromax tablet in varachha region.

    Secondary objective:

    To know which kind of prices prefer by users.

    To know the different criteria that the users undertake while buying

    the tablet.

    3) Research Design :

    The researcher used descriptive Research design because the researcher

    directly fills the questionnaire from users who are using tablets.

    4) Data collection method :

    Primary Data:

    In this study primary data has used and it will be collected by using

    questionnaire.

    Secondary Data:

    The researcher has collect secondary data from internet and

    references from library.

  • 22

    5) Sampling Design :

    The researcher has use non-probability convenience sampling for

    selecting the sample, because researcher chooses the sample as per their

    convenience.

    6) Sample Size :

    A sample of 200 users taken on the basis of convenience.

    7) Sample unit :

    The users has contacted for collecting data.

    8) Research tools applied :

    The researcher used tables and charts for data representation as will

    make easy to understand for others.

    9) Limitation of survey :

    The analysis and conclusion made by researcher as per their limited

    understanding and there may be some variation in actual situation.

    Limited area covered.

    The respondents personal bias may be affect which is uncontrollable.

  • CHAPTER: - 4

    DATA ANALYSIS

  • 23

    1. Which tablet do you have?

    Interpretation:

    From the above chart it is interpreted that 85 people out of 200 respondents

    are using have Samsung tablet and 115 people out of 200 respondents are

    using and have Micromax tablet.

    So it seems that majority users are using Micromax tablet and Micromax

    Company covers the large market than the Samsung Company on the bases

    of tablet.

  • 24

    2. Since how long have you been using this tablet?

    Interpretation:

    Samsung: -Form the above chart it is interpreted that 28 respondents are

    using Samsung tablet for less than 6 months since, 24 respondents are

    using for more than 6 month and less than 1 year, 14 respondents are

    using for more than 1 year and less than 2 year and last 19 respondents out

    of 85 are using for more than 2 year.

    Micromax: -From the above chart it is interpreted that 44 respondents are

    using Micromax tablet for less than 6 months since, 44 respondents are

    using for more than 6 month and less than 1 year, 19 respondents are

    using for more than 1 year and less than 2 year and last 8 respondents out

    of 115 are using for more than 2 year.

    So that it seems the more users are using since less than 6 month and than

    1 year Micromax tablet and Samsung tablet users are using since6 month

    to 1 year but less than micromax tablet.

  • 25

    3. How did you come to know about this tablet?

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 18 respondent are

    came to know about Samsung tablet from newspaper, 1 respondent is came

    to know from magazine, 24 respondent are came to know from television,

    18 respondent are from friends, 17 respondent are from internet and 7

    respondents out of 85 came to know from relatives.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 32 respondent are

    came to know about Micromax tablet from newspaper, 14 respondent are

    came to know from magazine, 14 respondent are came to know from

    television, 38 respondent are from friends, 11 respondent are from

    internet and 6 respondents out of 115 came to know from relatives.-

    So the above interpretation says that Samsung and Micromax tablet users

    are came to aware bout it from friends, television, and news paper.

  • 26

    4. Would you like to use the tablet services in future?

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 80 respondents are

    replied positively to use the Samsung tablet service in future and 5

    respondents replied negatively towards Samsung tablet service for future

    use.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 95 respondents are

    positively replied to use Micromax tablet for future use and 20 respondents

    replied negatively towards Micromax tablet service for future use.

    That above chart shows and interpretation express the majority users the do

    not used in future service of Samsung tablet and Micromax tablet users is

    used in future service than the Samsung tablet.

    So the change in future service it will be change in present time quality of

    service, facilities and sales after service and also the users is prefers the on

    the spot service it is.

  • 27

    5. Which tablet do you find more advances in overall specification?

    Interpretation:

    From the above chart it is interpreted that 85 people out of 200 respondents

    are less find advances in overall specification on Samsung tablet and 115

    people out of 200 respondents are more find advances in overall

    specification on Micromax tablet.

    So it seems that more find advances in overall specification on micromax

    tablet.

  • 28

    6. Does the tablet you own meets your desire?

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 59 respondent are

    replied positively to fulfill the Samsung tablet own meets our desire and 26

    respondents replied negatively towards Samsung tablet does not fulfill own

    meets our desire for the used to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 91 respondents are

    positively replied to fulfill the Micromax tablet for own meets our desire and

    24 respondents replied negatively towards Micromax tablet does not fulfill

    own meets our desire for the used to Micromax tablet.

    So the some respondent response give the some meets and desire is fulfill

    and some not fulfill the meets and desire but more fulfill micromax tablet

    own meets and desire than the Samsung tablet.

    And also the Samsung company prepare tablet in advance new technology

    through and less problem face so the prefer and fulfill the own meets and

    desire.

  • 29

    7. from our choosen tablet, answer the following.

    Reasonable price

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 43 respondent are

    strong agree, 25 respondent are agree, 12 respondent are neutral, 2

    respondent are disagree, 3 respondent are strong disagree to reasonable

    price for users interested to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 69 respondent are

    strong agree, 33 respondent are agree, 8 respondent are neutral, 2

    respondent are disagree, 3 respondent are strong disagree to reasonable

    price for users interested to Micromax tablet.

    So it seems the more respondent is strong agree in reasonable price of

    Micromax tablet than the Samsung tablet it will become Samsung company

    have price down and reasonable so the respondent are prefers the price

    Samsung tablet.

  • 30

    Long battery life

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 21 respondent are

    strong agree, 36 respondent are agree, 16 respondent are neutral, 7

    respondent are disagree, 5 respondent are strong disagree to long battery

    life for users used to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 19 respondent are

    strong agree, 56 respondent are agree, 25 respondent are neutral, 10

    respondent are disagree, 5 respondent are strong disagree to long battery

    life for users used to Micromax tablet.

    So the majority respondent is agreeing on the bases of long battery life in

    Micromax tablet than the Samsung tablet. So Samsung company adopt the

    long battery power in using tablet and solve problem face by the issue of

    battery life and provide big power battery.

  • 31

    Less hang problem

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 19 respondent are

    strong agree, 25respondentare agree, 27 respondent are neutral, 10

    respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to less hand

    problem for users used to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 12 respondent are

    strong agree, 31respondentare agree, 67 respondent are neutral, 11

    respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to less hang

    problem for users used to Micromax tablet.

    So that it seems the more respondent are neutral on the bases of less hang

    problem in Micromax tablet because it provide optimum facilities in less

    arising hang problem. If the Samsung company tablet prepare in do not

    arising hang problem so it prefer and also the low cost of price.

  • 32

    Stylish look

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 27 respondent are

    strong agree, 27 respondent are agree, 26 respondent are neutral, 3

    respondent are disagree, 2 respondent are strong disagree to stylish look

    for users like to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 22 respondent are

    strong agree, 46 respondent are agree, 21 respondent are neutral, 18

    respondent are disagree, 5 respondent are strong disagree to stylish look

    for users like to Micromax tablet.

    So the more respondents is agree on bases of stylish look in Micromax

    tablet because it provide more look option and Samsung company provide

    less look in tablet if the company provide stylish look and change the look

    and prepare the more attractive than the Micromax tablet it the agree of

    users.

  • 33

    More colors option

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 21 respondent are

    strong agree, 28 respondent are agree, 18 respondent are neutral, 14

    respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to more colors

    option for users interested to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 37 respondent are

    strong agree, 30 respondent are agree, 31 respondent are neutral, 9

    respondent are disagree, 8 respondent are strong disagree to more colors

    option for users interested to Micromax tablet.

    So it seems the majority respondent is agree and strong agree of more colors

    option in micromax tablet and if the Samsung company make the attractive

    colors tablet prepare and provide more colors option it the agree and strong

    agree.

  • 34

    Better after sales service

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 18 respondent are

    strong agree, 22respondentare agree, 26 respondent are neutral, 11

    respondent are disagree, 8 respondent are strong disagree to better after

    sales service for users like to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 37 respondent are

    strong agree, 30 respondent are agree, 31 respondent are neutral, 9

    respondent are disagree, 8 respondent are strong agree to better after sales

    service for users used to Micromax tablet.

    So the more respondent are agree and neutral of better after sales service in

    Micromax tablet and Samsung company is better after sales service do not

    provide of quality bases if the change the service it the maker of service time

    waiting is low and return in few days.

  • 35

    Long durability

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 27 respondent are

    strong agree, 30 respondent are agree, 14 respondent are neutral, 9

    respondent are disagree, 5 respondent are strong disagree to long durability

    for users used to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 31 respondent are

    strong agree, 30 respondent are agree, 36 respondent are neutral, 13

    respondent are disagree, 5 respondent are strong disagree to long durability

    for users used to Micromax tablet.

    So the more respondent is agreeing, strong agree and neutral on the bases

    of long durability in Micromax tablet and Samsung tablet is not durable in

    long time than the Micromax tablet.

    If the Samsung Company have use in long durable technical material then

    prepare tablet it is the preferable.

  • 36

    Good touch quality

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 32 respondent are

    strong agree, 27 respondent are agree, 16 respondent are neutral, 7

    respondent are disagree, 3 respondent are strong disagree to good touch

    quality for users interested to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 31 respondent are

    strong agree, 34 respondent are agree, 30 respondent are neutral, 16

    respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to good touch

    quality for users interested to Micromax tablet.

    So it seem that the respondent is agree and strong agree on the bases of

    good touch quality in Micromax tablet and less agree and strong agree in

    Samsung tablet.

    If the Samsung company maker the smooth and speedily operate touch

    quality gives it is the users is like.

  • 37

    Strong processor

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 33 respondent are

    strong agree, 22 respondent are agree, 20 respondent are neutral, 6

    respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to strong

    processor for users used to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 21 respondent are

    strong agree, 34 respondent are agree, 41 respondent are neutral, 11

    respondent are disagree, respondent are strong disagree to strong

    processor for users used to Micromax tablet.

    So the majority respondent is agree and neutral of the strong processor in

    Micromax tablet and Samsung tablet is less than the Micromax tablet.

    If the Samsung Company prepares the tablet in high quality of processor in

    different company so the response is come in strong.

  • 38

    Good Bluetooth system.

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 26 respondent are

    strong agree, 31 respondent are agree, 21 respondent are neutral, 5

    respondent are disagree, 2 respondent are strong disagree to good

    Bluetooth system for users interested to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 29 respondent are

    strong agree, 42 respondent are agree, 21 respondent are neutral, 18

    respondent are disagree, 5 respondent are strong agree to good Bluetooth

    system for users interested to Micromax tablet.

    So it seems that the more respondent is agree on the bases of good

    Bluetooth system in micromax tablet and if the Samsung company maker

    the speedily workable Bluetooth system it the tablet is more agree.

  • 39

    Powerful gsm /cdma system

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 21 respondent are

    strong agree, 27 respondent are agree, 22 respondent are neutral, 11

    respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to powerful

    gsm/cdma system for users like to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 37 respondent are

    strong agree, 23 respondent are agree, 22 respondent are neutral, 19

    respondent are disagree, 4 respondent are strong disagree to gsm/cdma

    system for users like to Micromax tablet.

    So the respondent is agreed and strong agrees of powerful gsm/cdma

    system in Micromax tablet and Samsung do not provide in powerful system

    because not given the option.

    If provide cdma option it the more respondent is agree because cdma system

    is less costly.

  • 40

    Big ram capacity

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 24 respondent are

    strong agree, 21 respondent are agree, 17 respondent are neutral, 14

    respondent are disagree, 9 respondent are strong disagree to big ram

    capacity for users used to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 26 respondent are

    strong agree, 34 respondent are agree, 30 respondent are neutral, 17

    respondent are disagree, 8 respondent are strong disagree to big ram

    capacity for users used to Micromax tablet.

    So it seems that the Micromax tablet is provide big ram capacity in less cost

    and if Samsung tablet is provide big ram capacity in less cost because users

    used speedily operate of tablet so the it agree.

  • 41

    Large memory storage

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 22 respondent are

    strong agree, 25 respondent are agree, 15 respondent are neutral, 7

    respondent are disagree, 6 respondent are strong disagree to large memory

    storage for users uses to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 26 respondent are

    strong agree, 45 respondent are agree, 21 respondent are neutral, 14

    respondent are disagree, 9 respondent are strong disagree to large memory

    storage for users uses to Micromax tablet.

    So the majority respondent is agree on the bases of large memory storage in

    Micromax tablet and If the Samsung company provide large storage because

    present time users is prefers the large memory storage.

  • 42

    More Application support

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 32 respondent are

    strong agree, 29 respondent are agree, 14 respondent are neutral, 7

    respondent are disagree, 3 respondent are strong disagree to more

    application support for users interested to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 36 respondent are

    strong agree, 33 respondent are agree, 22 respondent are neutral, 16

    respondent are disagree, 8respondent are strong agree to more application

    support for users interested in Micromax tablet.

    So it seems that the Micromax tablet provide more application support in

    strong agree of respondent.

    If the Samsung Company is gives more application support and additional

    application provide it the strong agree in respondent this tablet.

  • 43

    High quality camera

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 36 respondent are

    strong agree, 26 respondent are agree, 11 respondent are neutral, 9

    respondent are disagree, 3 respondent are strong disagree to high quality

    camera for users like to Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 35 respondent are

    strong agree, 32 respondent are agree, 23 respondent are neutral, 12

    respondent are disagree, 3 respondent are strong disagree to high quality

    camera for users like to Micromax tablet.

    So the strong agree of the high quality camera result in micromax tablet

    respondent and if the Samsung Company make now the high quality

    camera in low cost in this tablet it is the response they came high.

  • 44

    8. Personal information.

    1. Occupation.

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpretedthat10 respondent are

    business occupation bases, 64 respondent are students occupation bases, 8

    respondent are services occupation bases, 3 respondent are others

    occupation bases to users interest Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 26 respondent are

    business occupation bases, 65 respondent are students occupation bases,

    20 respondent are services occupation bases, 4 respondent are others

    occupation bases to users interest Micromax tablet.

    So it seems the student occupation bases mostly used of Micromax tablet

    than the Samsung tablet.

  • 45

    2. Age.

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that57 respondent are less

    than 20 age, 25 respondent are more than 20 age and less than 30 age, 3

    respondent are more than 30 age to users used Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted age that 51 respondent

    are less than 20, 57 respondent are more than 20 and less than 30, 7

    respondent are more than 30 to users used Micromax tablet.

    So the below the 20 age users used in majority both Samsung and

    micromax tablet but less difference in more users is Samsung tablet and

    less users in Micromax tablet.

    Because educated more uses this both tablet below the 30 age users.

  • 46

    3. Monthly income.

    Interpretation:

    Samsung:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 70 respondent are

    Monthly income less than Rs.10000, 9 respondent are more than Rs.10000

    and less than Rs.20000 monthly income, 5 respondent are more than

    Rs.20000 and less than Rs.30000 monthly income,1 respondent are more

    than Rs.30000 Monthly income to users used Samsung tablet.

    Micromax:-From the above chart it is interpreted that 82 respondent are

    monthly income less than 10000rs., 19 respondent are more than

    10000rs.and less than 20000rs.monthaly income,7 respondent are more

    than 20000rs.and less than 30000rs.monthaly income,7 respondent are

    more than 30000rs.monthaly income to users used Micromax tablet.

    So it seems that the below 10000rs. Monthly income users used tablet but

    more users is Micromax and less Samsung tablet. If Samsung company

    price fall it is the more interested buy this table.

  • CHAPTER: - 5

    FINDING

  • 47

    According to my research that majority respondent have and used to

    Micromax tablet and minor respondent used to Samsung tablet.

    It is found that majority respondent using Micromax tablet since 6

    month - 1 year and Samsung tablet 6 month - 1 year.

    It is found that majority respondent come to know about the

    Micromax tablet from newspaper and friends & Samsung tablet from

    the television, newspaper and friends.

    According to my research that more respondent like to use the tablet

    services in future in both Samsung and Micromax tablet.

    It is research that majority respondent do you find more advances in

    overall specification to Micromax tablet and minor respondent do not

    find advances in overall specification to Samsung tablet.

    It is research that more respondent the fulfill own meets your desire

    to both Samsung and Micromax tablet and minor respondent do not

    fulfills to both tablet.

    It is found that majority respondent agree, strong agree and neutral in

    reasonable price, long battery life, less hang problem, stylish look,

    more colors option, better sales after service, good Bluetooth system,

    good touch quality, strong processor, big ram capacity, powerful

    gsm/cdma system, more application support and high quality camera

    to both Samsung and Micromax tablet.

    According to my research that occupation bases student majority

    respondent do have and used both Samsung and Micromax tablet and

    then business, service and others.

    It is research that below the age 20 year bases more student have

    and used both Samsung and Micromax tablet and then more than age

    20 year.

    It is research that below that 10000rs. Monthly income bases more

    respondents do you have and used both Samsung and Micromax

    tablet and then more than 10000rs.

  • 48

    It is found that majority respondents are satisfied to the various

    factors like:-

    After analysis on various factors it is found that, customer

    satisfaction rate for Samsung tablet is more than Micromax tablet.

    It is found the most of the respondents are student.

  • CHAPTER: - 6

    CONCLUSION

  • 49

    Now days in Surat city people are buy the tablet for raising the status in

    society so people will go for stylish and status tablet like Micromax brand.

    There is also big market scope for stylish and economic tablet in

    communication and personal uses so, industry increased continuously so

    company should concentrate on that segment.

    Thus after all the above important discussion it can conclude that Samsung

    and Micromax managers have to sale tablet in a strict and efficient Manner.

    The respondents prefer Micromax tablet branded vehicles rather than

    Samsung tablet. For improvement end Samsung tablet most put more

    efforts towards creating price and features with higher displacement

    features which are more create higher power, similar or better than that of

    Micromax range of tablet.

    And for Micromax tablet, there should be efforts towards Providing more

    quality commitment relationship with present and prospect customer.

  • CHAPTER: - 7

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

  • WEBSITE:

    http://in.reuters.com/finance/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=00

    5930.K

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung

    http://www.micromaxinfo.com/resourceContent/Micromax-

    Mobiles-company-profile-final.pdf

  • CHAPTER: - 8

    ANNEXURE

  • Questionnaire

    I am GOTI NIKUNJ L. Student J.D.G Commerce Collage And Shree Swami

    Attmanand Saraswasti Collage Of Management Surat. I am doing research

    Comperative Study of Samsung And Micromax Tablet can you spend

    five minutes to answers the following questions this study is for attending

    purpose only no. information shall be disclosed anywhere.

    Part-A

    1. Which Tablet do you have?

    Samsung Micromax

    2. Since how long have you been using this tablet?

    Less than 6 month

    More than 6 month & Less than 1 year

    More than 1 year & Less than 2 year

    More than 2 year

    3. How did you come to know about this tablet?

    Newspaper Magazines

    Television Friends

    Internet Relatives

    4. Would you like to use the tablet services in future?

    Yes No

  • 5. Which tablet do you find more advances in overall specifications?

    Samsung Micromax

    6. Does the tablet you own meets your desire?

    Yes No

    7. Choose one of tablet as per there features which one is best?

    Features

    Strong

    agree

    Agree Neutral Dis

    agree

    Strong

    dis

    agree

    Reasonable Price

    Long battery life

    Less hang problem

    Stylish look

    More colors option

    Better after sales service

    Long durability

    Good touch quality

    Strong processor

    Good Bluetooth system

    Powerful gsm/cdma

    system

    Big RAM capacity

    Large memory storage

    More application support

    High camera quality

  • Part-B

    Name: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

    Contact: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

    Occupation:

    Business Student Service Other_ _ _ _ _ _ _

    Monthly Income: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

    Age: _ _ _ _ _