11_Mem_sep
-
Upload
praveen-yadav -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
description
Transcript of 11_Mem_sep
MEMBRANE SEPARATION PROCESSES
• Membrane: The layer ofmaterial that acts as a selectivebarrier between two phasesand remains impermeable tospecific substance when adriving force is applied.
Fundamentals of Membrane Process
specific substance when adriving force is applied.
• Membrane Separation Processprinciple: membrane acts as aselective filter under a drivingforce such as hydrostaticpressure/ concentrationgradient, etc.
ADVANTAGES
� Low energy alternative to evaporation.
� Chemical and mechanical stresses on the product are
� Product concentration and purification in a single step
� Selectivity is good.
�Method can be easily the product are minimal.
�No phase change involved(except in pervaporation), hence modest energy requirement.
�Method can be easily scaled up.
� In bioprocess industry: used in the recovery of extracellular products (proteins, enzymes) and biomass from fermentation broths
CLASSIFICATION OF MEMBRANE
SEPARATION PROCESSES
(on the basis of the driving force)
�Microfiltration (MF)
�Ultrafiltration (UF)
� Reverse osmosis (RO) or
I. Driving force:
hydrostatic pressure
� Reverse osmosis (RO) or
Hyperfiltration
�Dialysis
� Electrodialysis
II. Driving force:
concentration
gradient
III. Driving force: Applied
electric field
CLASSIFICATION OF MEMBRANE
SEPARATION PROCESSES
Micro filtration(MF) Ultrafiltration(UF)
Reverse osmosis(RO) Dialysis
• Change of phase
• Azeotropic mixture
• An inert carrier or
vacuum is provided
PERVAPORATION
vacuum is provided
on other side of
membrane
• Due to difference in
solubility and
diffusion.
Characteristics of Membrane Separation
ProcessesPROCESS DRIVING FORCE CHARACTERISTIC
FEATURES OF
MEMEBRANE PORE
SIZE
SEPARATION
MECHANISM
MF Pressure 0.1-1 bar 0.02-10 micrometre Sieving/filteringMF Pressure 0.1-1 bar 0.02-10 micrometre Sieving/filtering
UF Pressure 2-10 bar 0.001-0.02
micrometre
Sieving/filtering
RO Pressure 10-100
bar
Non – porous Solution diffusion
Dialysis Concentration
difference
1-3 nm Sieving and
diffusion
Electrodialysis Electrical potential Mol. Wt < 200 Ion migration
THEORETICAL MODELS FOR
MEMBRANE PROCESSES
CAPILLARY FLOW MODEL:
• Membrane is loose and microporous , capable of retaining particles larger than 10 A.
• The flow of the feed • The flow of the feed occurs through the pores by convective flow
• The solvent moves as viscous flow
• The solute molecules /smaller particles carried by convection with the solvent. Dominates in MF and UF
SOLUTION DIFFUSION MODEL
• The dissolution of the molecular species being transported in the material of the membrane followed by molecular diffusion.
THEORETICAL MODELS FOR
MEMBRANE PROCESSES
of the membrane followed by molecular diffusion.
• Driving force- concentration gradient in the membrane set up by applied pressure difference.
• Obeys Fick’s diffusion law.
• Membrane is tight and capable of retaining solutes less or about 10 Angstrom.
Dominates in RO
RETENTION COEFFICIENT
� It explains the separating ability of membrane in MF,UF and RO.
R = Cm - Cp
Cm
R is the theoretical retention coefficient and Cm and Cp represent the concentrations of the solute at the membrane surface and in the permeate respectively
� Actual retention coefficient R’ is� Actual retention coefficient R’ is
R’ = Cb – Cp
Cb
Where Cb is the concentration in the bulk
� R’= 1- ( 1 - R)(Cm / Cb)
� Due to Concentration polarization at the membrane surface Cm/Cb>1 and R’< R.
� Concentration polarization increases solute leakage in RO while build up of solute particles on the membrane surface in MF and UF.
FACTORS AFFECTING THE SEPARATION
PROCESSES
CONCENTRATION POLARISATION
FACTORS AFFECTING THE SEPARATION
PROCESSES
CONCENTRATION POLARISATION
• Short term and reversible.
• It occurs when the non permeating particles have Cm> Cb, the concentration polarisation is set up at membrane surface.
• Increases osmotic pressure and reduces flux.
• From the mass balance of the solute:• From the mass balance of the solute:
• Rate of convection towards the membrane= rate of diffusion back into the bulk liquid+ rate of permeation
Js C = D dC/dx + Js Cp
• Concentration of solute in the membrane is given by
Js=k’ ln((Cm-Cp)/(Cb-Cp))
• k’=mass transfer coefficient
• Js=flux
• k’ depends on Diffusivity, mol.wt, viscosity and the thickness of boundary layer.
FOULING
The flux through the membrane decreases slowly with time in all the membrane processes due to fouling caused by e.g.� Slime formation
� Microbial growth
� Deposition of macro molecules (particularly in UF)
� Colloidal deposition and physical compaction in membrane (particularly in RO due to high pressure operation)
Fouling is long term and irreversible.
� Inhibited by careful selection of membrane material(hydrophilic surface is less prone to fouling by proteins)
� Pretreatment of feed (such as pH adjustment or precipitation to remove salt)
� Frequent cleaning with chemicals and backwashing
2 types membrane fouling2 types membrane fouling
�Surface (temporary) fouling
•Foulant appears an evenly deposited layer on the membrane surface
•Can be easily removed by cleaning solution
•Permeation rate of membrane can be regenerated by cleaning
•Most common type of fouling in UF plant
•Most studies dealt with this type of fouling
�Pore (permanent) fouling
•Particulate matter diffuses into the membrane
•Could be caused by the poor quality of the cleaning water
•Flux cannot be regenerated by cleaning
•Determines the lifetime of the membrane
•Received much less attention in literature
Cross flow filtration overcomes both concentration polarization and fouling.
Cross flow membrane filtration
OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENT OF
MEMBRANES
1) Selectivity and high separation efficiency
2) High permeate flux rate
3) Mechanical/physical strength to withstand high pressure upto 50-60atm.pressure upto 50-60atm.
4) Durability and consistency of performance over prolonged periods
5) Resistance to corrosion
6) Ease of fabrication in appropriate shape
7) Low cost and readily available
STRUCTURE OF MEMBRANES
• Semipermeable membrane used in RO and UF have generally two phases.
• Top layer: thin(0.5-10um) dense layer, microporous structure;responsible for basic microporous structure;responsible for basic separation characteristics
• Bottom layer: thick(50-125um) macroporous material;gives strength to the membrane
• Both casted in a single membrane of 0.1 -0.2mm thickness.
PREPARATION OF MEMBRANES
Step I:base material is dissolved in solvent with additives- give homogeneous solution.
Step II: a film is casted by spreading solution over a glass plate or hollow tube.
Step III: controlled atmosphere maintained for Step III: controlled atmosphere maintained for evaporation of solvent.
Step IV: membrane dipped in water bath(273-281K), solvent and additives leachout, thus forming micropores.
Step V: membrane is annealed at 340-360K to cause pore shrinkage.
EQUIPMENT
Components of a typical membrane separation plant
Membrane ModulesMembrane Modules
� Spiral wound: Flexible permeate spacer between 2 flat membrane
sheets
� Hollow fibre: inside out / outside in flow
� Tubular : either single or in a bundle, inside – outside
� Plates and frame: Series of flat membrane sheets and support plates
Membrane ModulesMembrane Modules
Comparison of Membrane ModulesComparison of Membrane Modules
Type of Membrane Type of Membrane
Schematic diagrams of types of membranes
Applications of Membrane Separation
ProcessesSPECIES MOLECULAR
WEIGHT
SIZE(nm) TECHNIQUE
Inorganic salts 10 - 100 0.1 -0.2 RO
Simple organic
substances(acids ,
sugars)
100 - 500 0.4 -1.0 RO
sugars)
Antibiotics 400 - 1000 0.8 -1.2 RO
Biopolymers
(proteins, enzymes,
polysaccharides)
10^4 - 10^6 2 – 10 UF + D
virus 30 – 300 UF + D
Colloids 100 – 1000 UF + MF + D
Bacterial cells 300 – 10^4 UF + MF + D
Yeast and fungi 10^3 – 10^4 MF
CASE STUDIES• Separation of protein from
suspended particles using submerged membrane filtration:
� The main purpose of this study is to understand how to enhance the filtration flux and protein recovery in submerged membrane filtration by using hydrodynamic methods.
� PMMA particles and BSA were selected as the sample cells and
• Separation of ethanol from ethanol–water mixture and fermented sweet sorghum juice using pervaporation membrane reactor :
• Pervaporation, an effective and economical membrane technology, has been proven to substitute distillation process for ethanol separation. In this work, the separation of two types of mixtures; ethanol–water mixture and fermented sweet sorghum were selected as the sample cells and
proteins
� The filtration flux and BSA production in the SPI operation was much higher than in the other techniques, especially when SPI was combined with a periodic backwash.
� Refrence: Journal of Membrane Science, Volume 362, Issues 1-2, 15 October 2010, Pages 427-433Kuo-Jen Hwang, Hung-Pin Lo, Tung-Wen Cheng, Kuo-Lun Tung
fermented sweet sorghum were investigated using cellulose acetate membranes. The pervaporation performances of the two mixtures were carried out under various operating conditions such as ethanol concentrations, operating times and temperatures
• Ethanol flux is affected to a greater extent than water in the fermentation broth
• Refrence: Desalination, Volume 271, Issues 1-3, 15 April 2011, Pages 88-91P. Kaewkannetra, N. Chutinate, S. Moonamart, T. Kamsan, T.Y. Chiu
• Removal of char particles from fast pyrolysis bio-oil by microfiltration:
• Microscopic and ash content analysis of the feed and permeate streams were conducted to determine the efficacy of the process. The results demonstrated the removal of the major quantity of char particles with a significant reduction in overall ash content of the bio-oil.
Journal of Membrane Science, Volume 363, Issues 1-2, 1 November 2010, Pages 120-127Journal of Membrane Science, Volume 363, Issues 1-2, 1 November 2010, Pages 120-127Asad Javaid, Tatiana Ryan, Gayla Berg, Xiaoming Pan, TusharVispute, Surita R. Bhatia, George W. Huber, David M. Ford
GlossaryGlossaryFeed
� The solution to be concentrated or fractionated
Flux
� The rate of extraction of permeate measured in litres per square
meter of membrane surface per hour (L/m2/h)
Membrane fouling
� Deposition of solids on the membrane, irreversible during
processingprocessing
Permeate
•The filtrate, the liquid passing through the membrane
Retentate
•The concentrate, the retained liquid
Transmembrane pressure
•Pressure gradient between the upstream (retentate side) and downstream
(permeate side)