111416 vf StewartAreaWaterAnalysis - California
Transcript of 111416 vf StewartAreaWaterAnalysis - California
Stewart Area Water Analysis
————
City of Yuba City
November 2016
285-12-16-10
Patrick A. Johnston, Senior Engineer Date
QA/QC Review: Elizabeth T. Drayer,
Engineering Manager Date
Table of Contents
i City of Yuba City November 2016 Stewart Area Water Analysis w\c\285\12-16-10\wp\111416_SAWA
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................................................................... 1
2.1 Pipeline Criteria ................................................................................................................................ 2
2.2 Booster Pumping Criteria ................................................................................................................. 2
2.3 Storage Criteria ................................................................................................................................ 2
2.4 Fire Flow Criteria .............................................................................................................................. 2
2.5 Peaking Factors ................................................................................................................................ 3
3.0 Model Update .......................................................................................................................................... 3
4.0 Water Demands ...................................................................................................................................... 3
5.0 System Analysis ...................................................................................................................................... 5
5.1 Storage Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 5
5.2 Pumping Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 7
5.3 Pipeline Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 8
6.0 Summary of Findings .............................................................................................................................. 8
Stewart Area Water Analysis
1 City of Yuba City November 2016 Stewart Area Water Analysis w\c\285\12-16-10\wp\111416_SAWA
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report analyzes the effect of the Bogue Stewart Master Plan Area (Stewart Area) development on the City of Yuba City’s (City) water distribution system. The land uses that have been provided for this area include residential, commercial, parks/open space and one area with a land use of business, technology and light industry. The planned development will all contribute to the demands on the City’s potable water system.
The hydraulic model of the distribution system was originally developed during the 1997 Water Master Plan project, updated during the 2004 Water Master Plan and the 2006 Update to Water Demand and Infrastructure System Evaluation projects, and was later updated by City staff to include some of the piping in Regions 2 and 3. Piping for Region 5 was already included in the model. The model is now in a hydraulic modeling software package called WaterCAD.
For the purpose of this analysis, the Stewart Area consists of two portions. The main portion is bordered on the north by Bogue Road, on the west side by South Walton Avenue, and on the south by Stewart Road. The eastern border is not linear, but serves to include approximately half of the land area between Railroad Avenue and Garden Highway within the Stewart Area. The second portion of the Stewart Area is bordered on the west by Garden Highway, on the south approximately by the extension of Stewart Road, and on the east by Levee Road. The northern border is just south of Drummond Drive. The Stewart Area is highlighted in green on Figure 1-1.
The planned land uses for the area include: R-1: Low Density Residential
R-2: Medium/Low Density Residential
R-3: Medium/High Density Residential
C-M: Business, Technology and Light Industry
C-2: Community Commercial
C-1: Neighborhood Commercial
C-O: Office, Office Park
PF: Public Facility
This report analyzes the expected total water demands from the Stewart Area development and the effect of these demands on the City’s potable water distribution system to determine if any improvement projects are triggered by this planned development.
2.0 EVALUATION CRITERIA
The system evaluation criteria that were used to evaluate the effect of the planned Stewart Area development on the City’s water system were taken from the 2004 Water Master Plan Update and the 2006 Update to Water Demand and Infrastructure System Evaluation. The effect of the increased water demands from the development of the Stewart Area was determined by using these criteria to evaluate system performance.
Stewart Area Water Analysis
2 City of Yuba City November 2016 Stewart Area Water Analysis w\c\285\12-16-10\wp\111416_SAWA
2.1 Pipeline Criteria
The criteria used to evaluate the operation of the distribution system pipeline network are shown in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1. Pipeline Velocity and Pressure Criteria
System Criteria ValueAllowable Velocities
Maximum Day and Peak Hour Maximum Velocity
7 feet per second (fps)
Fire-Flow Maximum Velocity 10 fps Allowable Pressures
Normal Operation Maximum Pressure 60 pounds per square inch (psi) Normal Operation Minimum Pressure 40 psi Peak Hour Minimum Pressure 30 psi Fire-Flow Minimum Pressure (at all junctions) 20 psi
2.2 Booster Pumping Criteria
There are no storage facilities that supply the City distribution system via gravity. Therefore, the pumping facilities must supply the demands in the system. The pumping facilities are considered to be adequately sized if the firm pumping capacity is equal to or larger than the Peak Hour demands on the system. For the City, the firm pumping capacity is defined as the combined capacity of the pumping system with the largest single pump out of service.
2.3 Storage Criteria
The criteria used to evaluate the storage in the City system in the prior Water Master Plan updates includes an operational storage component equal to 25 percent of Maximum Day demands and an emergency storage component equal to 75 percent of Average Day demands. Fire flow storage requirements depend on the flow rate and length of time for different fire flow requirements. The largest fire flow storage value is 1,200,000 gallons, as calculated based on a fire flow demand of 5,000 gallons per minute (gpm) and a duration of four hours.
2.4 Fire Flow Criteria
The minimum fire flow requirements for different land use categories are included in Table 2-2. The system must be capable of supplying these fire flow demands for a duration of four hours.
Stewart Area Water Analysis
3 City of Yuba City November 2016 Stewart Area Water Analysis w\c\285\12-16-10\wp\111416_SAWA
Table 2-2. Fire Flow Requirements
Land Use Category Fire Flow Demand, gpm R-1: Low Density Residential 2,000 R-2: Medium/Low Density Residential 3,000 R-3: Medium/High Density Residential 3,000 C-M: Business, Technology and Light Industry 5,000 C-2: Community Commercial 5,000 C-1: Neighborhood Commercial 5,000 C-O: Office, Office Park 5,000 PF: Public Facility 4,000
2.5 Peaking Factors
Peaking factors will be used to scale up the Average Day demands to allow the evaluation of the system under Maximum Day and Peak Hour demand conditions based on the performance criteria described in the sections above. According to the 2006 Water Master Plan Update, the City’s Maximum Day demands are 2.0 times the Average Day demands, and the City’s Peak Hour demands are 3.5 times the Average Day demands. These same peaking factors were used in this analysis to calculate the Maximum Day and Peak Hour demands.
3.0 MODEL UPDATE
Pipelines for the Stewart Area were added to the model. Two storage facilities were added to the system within the Stewart Area, along with booster pumping facilities, at locations provided by the City. No other updates to the hydraulic model were included. Pipeline alignments and diameters provided by the City were initially used to run the model. The pipe diameters were updated to provide appropriate pressures within the distribution system.
4.0 WATER DEMANDS
The base demands used in the model are those that had been updated during the El Margarita Development Analysis in January 2015. The demands for the El Margarita area are included in the model used for this analysis.
To estimate the demands within the Stewart Area, information on the expected land uses was analyzed, along with non-residential land use demand factors that had been developed during the El Margarita Development Analysis by analyzing billing data. Additional land use factors from information provided by the City for Elementary/Middle School, Open Space and Parks. The demand factors are summarized in Table 4-1 below.
Stewart Area Water Analysis
4 City of Yuba City November 2016 Stewart Area Water Analysis w\c\285\12-16-10\wp\111416_SAWA
Table 4-1. Demand Factors
Land Use Gallons Per Day Per Acre (gpd/ac) Business, Technology and Light Industry 294 Community Commercial 1,555 Elementary/Middle School 3,455 Manufacturing, Processing and Warehousing 4,995 Neighborhood Commercial 1,549 Office and Office Park 1,121 Open Space 3,740 Parks 3,740 Public and Semi-Public 191 Regional Commercial 570
Information provided by the City included the estimated areas for each non-residential land use within the development area. Demands were calculated using these areas and the demand factors above. For residential areas, a demand of 216 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) was used, along with an estimate of 2.67 persons per dwelling unit. The 216 gpcd value is the 2015 target from the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. Information provided by the City contained the number of dwelling units estimated within each residential area within the Stewart Area. The residential and non-residential demand estimate calculations produced a total Average Day demand of 1.73 mgd for the Stewart Area, as summarized below in Table 4-2. Open Space was not included, as there is no demand.
Table 4-2. Average Daily Demand for the Stewart Area
LU Code Land Use Area, acre Flow, gpd R-1 Low Density Residential 384 967,786 R-2 Medium/Low Density Residential 63 328,869 R-3 Medium/High Density Residential 30 410,117 C-M Business, Technology and Light Industry 59 17,225 C-2 Community Commercial 35 54,892 C-1 Neighborhood Commercial 8 11,974 C-O Office/Office Park 8 9,248 EMS Elementary/Middle School 23 80,701 OS Open Space 9 34,037
PFPublic Facility (includes Public Facility PG&E Substation and Public Parks 5 890
PK Parks 17 63,286
Total 641 1,979,026
Stewart Area Water Analysis
5 City of Yuba City November 2016 Stewart Area Water Analysis w\c\285\12-16-10\wp\111416_SAWA
These demands for the Stewart Area were added to the demands that were already in the model scenarios, as shown in Table 4-3 below.
Table 4-3. Estimated Demands
Scenario Existing Demands,
mgdEl Margarita
Demands, mgd Stewart Area
Demands, mgd Total Anticipated Demands, mgd
Average Day 14.4 1.1 1.98 17.48 Maximum Day 28.8 2.1 3.96 34.86 Peak Hour 50.4 3.7 6.93 61.03
The demands for the Stewart Area were added to the hydraulic model at appropriate junctions within the Stewart Area.
5.0 SYSTEM ANALYSIS
The operation of the City’s water distribution system was analyzed with the estimated demands for the Stewart Area development to determine the effect that these demands will have on system operation, and to determine if the system improvements that have been proposed are adequate.
5.1 Storage Analysis
The City’s existing storage facilities are summarized in Table 5-1. As indicated in Section 2.3, the total required storage is equal to the sum of the storage components for operational, emergency and fire flow requirements. The operational storage requirement is 25 percent of the Maximum Day demand. The emergency storage requirement is 75 percent of the Average Day demand. The fire flow storage is the largest fire flow storage value, which for the City is 1.2 million gallons (MG).
Table 5-1. Existing Storage Facilities
Tank Site Total Storage Capacity, MG Water Treatment Plant 8.0 Harter Tanks 4.0 Sam Brannon Tank 1.0 Rowe Avenue Tank 1.0 Burns Tank 3.0 Sanborn Tank 3.2
Total 20.2
The current storage requirements for the existing system are displayed in Table 5-2, which indicates that there is a current storage requirement of 19.2 MG, which means that there is currently a surplus of 1 MG of storage capacity. This amount of surplus storage would be sufficient to support 0.8 mgd of Average Day demand. Using the residential demand assumptions of 216 gpcd
Stewart Area Water Analysis
6 City of Yuba City November 2016 Stewart Area Water Analysis w\c\285\12-16-10\wp\111416_SAWA
and 2.67 persons per dwelling unit, this translates to approximately 1,400 additional housing units that could be supported by the existing surplus storage in the City.
Table 5-2. Storage Requirements with Current Demand
Scenario Anticipated Demands,
mgd Storage Requirement Storage Requirement, MGAverage Day 14.4 Emergency Storage is 75% of
Average Day Demand 10.8
Maximum Day 28.8 Operational Storage is 25% of Maximum Day Demand
7.2
Fire Flow 5,000 gpm for 4 hours 1.2
Total 19.2
The current storage requirements for the existing system, when the demands for El Margarita are included, are shown in Table 5-3.
Table 5-3. Storage Requirements with Current Demand with El Margarita Demands
Scenario Anticipated Demands,
mgd Storage Requirement Storage Requirement, MGAverage Day 15.5 Emergency Storage is 75% of
Average Day Demand 11.6
Maximum Day 30.9 Operational Storage is 25% of Maximum Day Demand
7.7
Fire Flow 5,000 gpm for 4 hours 1.2
Total 20.5
The current storage requirements for the existing system, when the demands for both the El Margarita and Stewart Areas are included, are shown in Table 5-4.
Table 5-4. Storage Requirements with Current Demand with El Margarita and Stewart Area Demands
Scenario Anticipated Demands,
mgd Storage Requirement Storage Requirement, MGAverage Day 17.14 Emergency Storage is 75% of
Average Day Demand 13.1
Maximum Day 34.19 Operational Storage is 25% of Maximum Day Demand
8.7
Fire Flow 5,000 gpm for 4 hours 1.2
Total 23.0
Stewart Area Water Analysis
7 City of Yuba City November 2016 Stewart Area Water Analysis w\c\285\12-16-10\wp\111416_SAWA
The required capacity of additional storage facilities to provide adequate storage for the existing demand conditions plus both the demands for both the El Margarita and Stewart Areas is 2.8 MG (Required Storage of 23.0 MG – Existing Storage of 20.2 MG).
The individual storage requirements for the current system demands, the El Margarita Area and the Stewart Area, shown separately, are as follows:
Current System: 19.2 MG
El Margarita Area: 1.4 MG
Stewart Area: 2.5 MG The information provided by the City indicated that two new storage facilities are proposed for the Stewart Area, one on the west side and one on the east side. The system hydraulic model was used to determine if the two storage facilities could be combined into one location. The model indicated that the system can operate adequately with one larger storage facility located in either of the proposed locations within the Stewart Area.
5.2 Pumping Analysis
The City’s existing firm booster pumping capacity is summarized in Table 5-5. The firm booster pumping capacity is defined as the combined capacity of all booster pumping facilities with the largest unit out of service. The City’s distribution system is served entirely by its pumping facilities. Therefore, the firm capacity should be equal to or greater than the Peak Hour demand. The largest pump is the 7.4 million gallons per day (mgd) pump located at the water treatment plant. The firm pumping capacity of the City’s distribution system is 55.2 mgd.
Table 5-5. Pumping Capacity
Location Firm Pumping Capacity, mgd Water Treatment Plant (Existing High Lift Pump Station) 30.0 Booster Pumps at Sam Brannon Tank Site 1.3 Booster Pumps at Rowe Avenue Tank Site 1.3 Booster Pumps at Garden/Burns Tank Site 3.3 Booster Pumps at Harter Tank Site 10.8 Booster Pumps at Sanborn Tank Site 8.5
Total 55.2
As shown in Section 4.0 Water Demands, the anticipated Peak Hour demands after the El Margarita and Stewart areas are fully developed are projected to be 61.0 mgd. This is higher than the firm pumping capacity of 55.2 mgd presented above. Therefore, the firm pumping capacity of the new pump station at the proposed storage facility planned for the Stewart Area must be at least 5.8 mgd.
Stewart Area Water Analysis
8 City of Yuba City November 2016 Stewart Area Water Analysis w\c\285\12-16-10\wp\111416_SAWA
5.3 Pipeline Analysis
The estimated demands for the Stewart Area were added to the hydraulic model to determine if the existing distribution system has sufficient capacity to support these demands, and to determine if the pipelines that have been proposed are adequately sized. For each scenario, if the pumps at the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) were not sufficient, as indicated by pressures in the system that did not meet the pressure criteria, then additional pumps were turned on to increase supply and boost pressure.
As indicated in Table 2-1, the minimum pressure criterion for normal operating conditions is 40 psi, which will be used to evaluate Maximum Day demand conditions. The minimum pressure criterion for Peak Hour demand conditions is 30 psi. The minimum pressure criterion for Maximum Day demand plus fire flow is 20 psi.
The pressures in the distribution system under Maximum Day demand conditions for existing demands plus demands for the El Margarita and Stewart Areas, with four pumps operating at the WTP pump station and one pump operating at the Burns/Garden Pump Station, are displayed on Figure 5-1.
Figure 5-2 shows the system pressures in the distribution system under Peak Hour demand conditions for existing demands plus demands for the El Margarita and Stewart Areas, with four pumps operating at the WTP, two pumps at the Harter Tank Site, one pump operating at the Sanborn Tank Site, one pump operating at the Burns/Garden Storage Facility and one pump operating at the proposed storage facility on the west side of the Stewart Area. The results show that a minimum pressure of 30 psi is maintained within the distribution system, except for one small area west of El Margarita, which is where the demands for the El Margarita area are assigned. This is likely caused by the demands for the El Margarita area being represented by a single demand in this location and has nothing to do with the Stewart Area development.
The model was run within the Stewart Area under Maximum Day for existing demands plus demands for the El Margarita and Stewart Areas plus Fire Flow demand conditions. Fire flow demands were assigned to junctions within the hydraulic model according to the adjacent planned land uses. The pipeline diameters were sized in the model to maintain a minimum pressure of 20 psi during the fire flow demand conditions. Figure 5-3 displays in red the recommended pipeline diameters for the pipeline network within the Stewart Area based on the Fire Flow analysis.
The pressures shown on Figure 5-4 indicate the residual pressure at each junction when the fire flow demand is added to that junction. Fire flow demands are not added all at the same time. The residual pressures are calculated individually for each junction, with only the fire flow for that junction added to the system. For these results, three pumps were operating at the WTP pump station, one pump was operating at the Sanborn Tank Site and one pump was operating at the storage facility proposed for the east side of the Stewart Area.
6.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The analysis described above showed that when both the El Margarita and Stewart Areas are fully developed, additional pumping and storage facilities will be required. The analysis also showed that the pipeline network that has been proposed for the Stewart Area is adequate for all areas
Stewart Area Water Analysis
9 City of Yuba City November 2016 Stewart Area Water Analysis w\c\285\12-16-10\wp\111416_SAWA
except for the southwest corner, where larger pipeline diameters are needed to provide adequate fire flow capacity.
The analysis showed that the City’s current storage facilities are not sufficient to support the development of both the El Margarita and Stewart Areas. The storage deficit is estimated to be 2.8 MG.
The analysis showed that the City’s current pumping facilities are not sufficient to support the development of both the El Margarita and Stewart Areas. The firm pumping capacity deficit is estimated to be 5.8 mgd.
While the City’s existing pipeline network is adequate to support the Stewart Area development, the pipelines proposed within the Stewart Area are not. It is recommended that the pipelines in the southwest corner of the Stewart Area be installed as 16-inch diameter pipelines to support the fire flow demands in this area.
Last Saved: 11/17/2016 1:31:01 PM W:\Clients\285 City of Yuba City\12-16-10 W and WW Modeling\GIS\MXD\Figure1-1.mxd : pjohnston
Figure 1-1 Bogue Stewart Master
Plan Area Development City of Yuba City
Bogue Stewart Master PlanArea Analysis
0 4,0002,000
Scale in Feet
Symbology
Western Stewart AreaEastern Stewart Area
Parcels
SMITH RD
GA
RD
EN H
WY
SING
H'S
WAY
WA
LLA
CE
DR
HAS
TIN
GS
CT
TRID
EN
TC
T
COLONY
CT
WILD
RIVER
DR
BUR
L CT
LASK D
R
S W
ALT
ON
AV
E
MILLFRONT
AVE
EUREKA DR
WIND
RIVER CT
WAVERLYCT
TRUCKEE
CT
TIMBE
R C
T
RH
INE C
T
KE
LSE
Y C
T
ROYAL
RIVER DR
MEADO
W
WALK DR
MU
IR R
D
LOISLN
AUR
OR
A DR
SOUTHPOINTEDRDOLPHIN
CT
PECAN DR
LONELYOAK DR
CA
RM
ELO
WAY
DRUMMOND DR
CORBY CT
GOLDRIVER DR
NEPTUNE DR
TULSA DR
HA
STIN
GS
WAY
SOU
TH
PAR
K DR
RA
MO
NA
AVE
NA
UR
A C
T
CECILY CT
BIG
OA
KS CT
HAM
STEAD
LN
EM
ER
ALD
DR
SPRINGCREEK CT TIFFANY
WAY
SH
ELB
Y C
T
HARBORTOWN DR
EL VALLASCIR
LOSBRAVOS DR
WH
ITE O
AK
DR
SHANGHAI BEND RDR
APID
FALLS D
R
COLD
WATER ST
OR
EG
ON
WAY
CIRCASSIANDR
REED RD
CANTERBURY DR
UTA
HC
T
SHADY LN
TAYLORRD
STARRRD
CO
LOM
BIA D
R BOGUE RDPAC
IFIC
A D
R
DEER
CREEK DR
IDA
HO
WAY
MA
CK
EN
ZIE
WAY
OLE
AND
ER D
R
EDGEWATER WAY
CLA
RE
MO
NT
WAY
MISSISSIPPI DR
BIG
OA
KS
DR
WHITE
ROCK DR
RA
ILR
OA
D A
VE
MOSBURG LP
CA
RR
DR
HW
Y 9
9 N
BH
WY
99
SB
GREEN
VALLEY RD
CA
MIN
ITO
RD
STEWART RD
TUS
CA
N R
D
0 5,0002,500
Scale in Feet
SECO
ND
ST
LIVE
OA
K B
LVD
WIN
CO
JUDY WAY
HEIDI WAY
WA
LNU
T S
T
HWY20 EB
PLUM
AS
CT
S W
ALT
ON
AV
E
AR
I CT
ADELINEST
DOLPHINCT
RO
SE
LN
WEBB ST
LORELWAY
MU
IRR
D
TEAL CT
B ST
DA
PH
NE
LNE
UG
EN
EC
T
OH
LEY
ER
RD
PEASE RD
BUTTEHOUSE RD
COLE CT
MARKLEYRD
LIZANNEDR
PATTONAVE
SHIRLEYPL
SUNSETAVE
HOLLYAVE
CR
ESW
ELL
DR
EDITHAVE
HE
MB
RE
ER
D
ELM
ER
AVE
FORTNARD
GE
NE
VAAV
E
PUTM
AN
AVE
BU
TTE
AVE
RA
ILR
OA
D A
VE
BOGUE RD
HO
LCO
MB
RD
N W
ALT
ON
AVE
POOLEBLVD
GLIDDEN LN
HW
Y 9
9 N
B
CA
MIN
ITO
RD
YOUNG RD
ELM
ER
AVE
LAN
GR
D
GR
OV
ER
D
HWY20 EB HWY 20 WB
GA
BR
IEL
AVE
STEWART RD
REED RD
SMITH RD
STARR RD
RE
DD
ING
AVE
DA
PH
NE
LN
TAYLOR RD
LINCOLN RD
S G
EO
RG
E W
AS
HIN
GTO
N B
LVD
S T
OW
NS
HIP
RD
54
46
47
56
4545
45
55
5548 48 48
51
4747
4747
43
4444
44
44
55
5252
54
49
52
49
45
4645 4645
46
4747
47
4747
4949
555555
5552 5353
5354 54
54
53
55
4747
4747
48
4847
48
4647
50
49 49
5051
50
51
49
51
4545
4545
4343
4343
43
4141 40
4140
40
4040
40
4040
404040
45 4544
45
45
4545 4545
45
45
47
55
48
49 49 49
5051
50
51
44
45
46
46 47
44
4646
45
4545
4847
46
4746
44
45
45
44
454544
44
4444
4444
44
45
45
45
46 4849
4744
45
45
4646
46
47
48
4849
49
5151
50
46 48 49 5351
40
40
42
40
43
40
44 46
4544
45
45
45 46
46
46
46
46
47
4646
47
474747
4849
47 4747
474848
49
49
49
49 50
49
4748
48
5050
51
51
53
54
58
40
44
46
45
51
54
5049
54
49
46
42
43
4343
42
42
43
42
42
42
4343
42
43
43
42
42 4342
42
42
42
4342
42
43
4343 43
43
43
42
42
42
42
42
4243
43
43
43
42
43
43
42
43
43
43
42
43
42
43
42
42
42 42
42
43
4242
42
43
4242
43
43
42
44
43
43
4040
4040
40
4040 40
40 4040
40
40
40 40
40
40
40
40
40
40
4040
40 40
4040
40
40
4040
55555554
54
54
545454 54
5454
54
54
54
54
5547
4747
47
47
4747
47
44 44
44
4344 44
44
44
44 4445 44
44
474747
4747
47
464647
47
4747
47
46
46
4646 46
42
4444
43
444444
44
43
43
43
43
43 4343
4444
44
4343
4343 44
44 44
4343
4444
4242
42
42424141
4141
414141
41
4141
42
42
42
42 42
4242
6
72 00
48
42 43
44
42
4444
44 44
41
45
45
43
4343
4444
45
49
45 4545
44
44
43
4343
4343
43
434343
43
4343
4343
43 43
43
43 43
4343 43
4343
434343
434343
4344
4444
444343
43
43
43
43434242
43
4242
41
4343
4343
43434343
434343
4343
43 43 4343
43
43
43
4443
43
4443
4342
42 42
43
4343
42
4242
42
4242
42
42
4242
43
4343
42
46
53
44
42
44
4644
43
444545
43
4343
42
424242
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
43
4343
8
24
446
7258
49 49
4747
4444
461346
48848
1347
30674610
47
798 79
4140
404242 41
44
44
44 4340
4142
42 41
424340
41 44
41
41
44 41
41
41
4041
40
Figure 5-1 System Pressures for
Maximum Day Demands City of Yuba City
Bogue Stewart Master PlanArea Analysis
Last
Sav
ed: 1
1/18
/201
6 2:
34:5
7 P
M W
:\Clie
nts\
285
City
of Y
uba
City
\12-
16-1
0 W
and
WW
Mod
elin
g\G
IS\M
XD
\Fig
ure5
-1-W
ater
.mxd
: pj
ohns
ton
Symbology
PRESSURE< 30 psi30 - 40 psi
40 - 60 psi
60 - 65 psi> 65 psi
PipesParcels
0 5,0002,500
Scale in Feet
SECO
ND
ST
LIVE
OA
K B
LVD
JUDY WAY
GROVECT
HWY20 EB
PLUM
AS
CT
S W
ALT
ON
AV
E
AR
I CT
ADELINEST
NINA
WAY
DOLPHINCT
RO
SE
LN
WEBB ST
POOLEBLVD
LORELWAY
MU
IRR
D
ELMST
PLUM
AS ST
B ST
DA
PH
NE
LNE
UG
EN
EC
T
OH
LEY
ER
RD
OLI
VE
ST
PEASE RD
KIRA CTBUTTEHOUSE RD
MARKLEYRD
BLE
VIN
RD
PATTONAVE
SHIRLEYPL
SUNSETAVE
BANDYWAY
HOLLYAVE
CR
ESW
ELL
DR
EDITHAVE
HE
MB
RE
ER
D
ELM
ER
AVE
FORTNARD
GE
NE
VAAV
E
PUTM
AN
AVE
BU
TTE
AVE
RA
ILR
OA
D A
VE
BOGUE RD
HO
LCO
MB
RD
N W
ALT
ON
AVE
POOLEBLVD
GLIDDEN LN
HW
Y 9
9 N
B
CA
MIN
ITO
RD
YOUNG RD
ELM
ER
AVE
LAN
GR
D
GR
OV
ER
D
HWY20 EB
GA
BR
IEL
AVE
STEWART RD
REED RD
SMITH RD
STARR RD
RE
DD
ING
AVE
DA
PH
NE
LN
TAYLOR RD
LINCOLN RD
S G
EO
RG
E W
AS
HIN
GTO
N B
LVD
S T
OW
NS
HIP
RD
54
45
56
4343
43
54
5345 46 46
49
45 45
4444
40
4343
43
44
54
5151
5351
52
47
42
43
44
43
45
4546
46
45
4747
47
54
54
5451 5151
5252 53
53
51
54
454545
4545
45
46
46
4546
4545
48
4849
48
50
48
49
4343
4343
4242
4242
43
4041 40
4140
40
4040
40
4040
393939
39
4343
43
43
43
43 43434343
45
54
464647 47
4849
48
505044
44 45
43
4444
43
4343
43
45
44
4544
42
42
42
434242
41
434343
4344
43
43
44 4646
4544
44
42
4444
44
45
46
4647
48
50
47
45 46 47 5249
39
40
41
40
42
41
45
4443
44
44
43 45
45
45
45
44
45
4545
45
464545
46 47
46 4546
464646
4748
48
48
47
48
48
4647
47
4848
49
50
52
53
39
44
47
44
43
49
53
49
53
47
43
40
38
43
424238
41
41
40
38
41
41
39
41
41
4039
40 4140
39
38
42
39
40
41
41
41
42
42
38
40
39
39
40
39
4141
41
42
3938
41
40
41
38
41
41
41
39
41
41
42
3941
39 41
42
39
40
3841
39
39
41
41
38
44
44
46
4040
403939
39
393939 39
393939
3939
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
40
4040
40 40
4040
40
41
4040
53535352
52
53
525253 52
5252
52
53
53
5344
4444
44
44
4444
44
44
41 42
424142
42
42
41
44 4344 44
43
444444
4444
44
4444
4444 44
4444
44
44
4444 44
41
4241
41
444444
44
42
42
42
42
41 4142
4444
44
4141
4141 41
41 41
4141
45
4344
404040
40
39393737
3535
373737
37
3535
38
38
38
38
3838 38
3838
6
66 00
46
39 40
46
39
4444
44 44
40
4243
45
41
4242
4444
4545 4545
44
44
41
414141
4141
41
414242
414141 41
42
42 41
4141
41 41
414141
41
42
4242
434343
444343
4242
424141
42
42 42
4141
41
4141 42
4242
4242
4242 42
42
42
4242
43
434342
42
42
4443
43
4343
4343
4242
41
42 4242
43
41
4141
4141
41
41
4141
4242
41 41
42
44
44
52
44
39
45
4442
42
564545
40
4040
3939
3939
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
40
4040
8
24
456
66
4747
4646
4444
4513
8 478 47
1345
307352
52
74874
4140
404242 41
44
44
44 4240
4041
41 41
414241
41 44
41
41
43 40
41
40
4040
41
Figure 5-2 System Pressures for
Peak Hour Demands City of Yuba City
Bogue Stewart Master PlanArea Analysis
Last
Sav
ed: 1
1/18
/201
6 2:
33:2
4 P
M W
:\Clie
nts\
285
City
of Y
uba
City
\12-
16-1
0 W
and
WW
Mod
elin
g\G
IS\M
XD
\Fig
ure5
-2-W
ater
.mxd
: pj
ohns
ton
Symbology
PRESSURE< 30 psi30 - 40 psi
40 - 60 psi60 - 65 psi
> 65 psi
PipesParcels
Last Saved: 11/17/2016 2:58:24 PM C:\Users\pjohnston\Documents\Projects\YubaCity\WaterModel\Stewart\ExistingMD3.mxd : pjohnston
Figure 5-3 Recommended Pipeline
Diameters City of Yuba City
Bogue Stewart Master PlanArea Analysis
0 4,0002,000
Scale in Feet
Symbology
Proposed Pipe with DiameterExisting Pipes
Parcels
14
12
16
16
16
16
1212
16
16
12
16
14
12
16
16
14
1612
16
14
14
12
1616 14
1616
121216
12
16
14
12 16
16
99
BOGUE
STEWART
WA
LTO
N
RA
ILR
OA
D
SMITH
GA
RD
EN
LASK
STARR
TAYLOR
NAND
TULSA
TUS
CA
N
GE
RM
AIN
E
SHANGHAI BEND
AR
I
SLEEPYPH
ILLI
PS
CO
LOM
BIA
BIG
OA
KS
MU
IR
NEPTUNEHARBOR TOWN
STE
PH
EN
LOIS
MA
GN
OLIA
PAC
IFIC
A
PARKWOOD
ALYSSA
SING
H'S
JEFF
RE
Y
RAPID
FALLS
RADDISON
WH
ITE O
AK
EUREKA
BLUE OAK
SOU
TH PA
RK
RAJ
MILLFRONT
OA
K
CARR
GO
LD R
IVE
R
DE
L LA
GO
SOUTHLAND
CA
MIN
ITO
HAS
TIN
GS
DONALD
SA
PP
HIR
E
LONELY OAK
MA
CK
EN
ZIE
SH
ELB
Y
OLE
AN
DE
R
AU
TUM
NW
OO
D
CECILY
NA
UR
A
SOUTHPOINTE
MO
RR
ISON
CIRCASSIAN
EM
ER
ALD
WHITE ROCK
EL VALLAS
CORBY
HAM
STEAD
GR
EE
N V
ALL
EY
BRAN
DO
N
PH
ILLI
PS
99
Last Saved: 11/18/2016 2:43:50 PM W:\Clients\285 City of Yuba City\12-16-10 W and WW Modeling\GIS\MXD\Figure5-4-Water.mxd : pjohnston
Figure 5-4 Residual Pressures with Max
Day + Fire Flow Demands withRecommended Diameters
City of Yuba CityBogue Stewart Master Plan
Area Analysis
0 4,0002,000
Scale in Feet
Symbology
Residual Pressure< 20 psi
> 20 psi
Pipes
Parcels
SMITH RD
GA
RD
EN H
WY
SING
H'S
WAY
WA
LLA
CE
DR
HAS
TIN
GS
CT
TRID
EN
TC
T
COLONY
CT
WILD
RIVER
DR
BUR
L CT
LASK D
R
S W
ALT
ON
AV
E
MILLFRONT
AVE
EUREKA DR
WIND
RIVER CT
WAVERLYCT
TRUCKEE
CT
TIMBE
R C
T
RH
INE C
T
KE
LSE
Y C
T
ROYAL
RIVER DR
MEADO
W
WALK DR
MU
IR R
D
LOISLN
AUR
OR
A DR
SOUTHPOINTEDRDOLPHIN
CT
PECAN DR
LONELYOAK DR
CA
RM
ELO
WAY
DRUMMOND DR
CORBY CT
GOLDRIVER DR
NEPTUNE DR
TULSA DR
HA
STIN
GS
WAY
SOU
TH
PAR
K DR
RA
MO
NA
AVE
NA
UR
A C
T
CECILY CT
BIG
OA
KS CT
HAM
STEAD
LN
EM
ER
ALD
DR
SPRINGCREEK CT TIFFANY
WAY
SH
ELB
Y C
T
HARBORTOWN DR
EL VALLASCIR
LOSBRAVOS DR
WH
ITE O
AK
DR
SHANGHAI BEND RDR
APID
FALLS D
R
COLD
WATER ST
OR
EG
ON
WAY
CIRCASSIANDR
REED RD
CANTERBURY DR
UTA
HC
T
SHADY LN
TAYLORRD
STARRRD
CO
LOM
BIA D
R
BOGUE RD
PAC
IFIC
A D
R
DEER
CREEK DR
IDA
HO
WAY
MA
CK
EN
ZIE
WAY
OLE
AND
ER D
R
EDGEWATER WAY
CLA
RE
MO
NT
WAY
MISSISSIPPI DR
BIG
OA
KS
DR
WHITE
ROCK DR
RA
ILR
OA
D A
VE
MOSBURG LP
CA
RR
DR
HW
Y 9
9 N
BH
WY
99
SB
GREEN
VALLEY RD
CA
MIN
ITO
RD
STEWART RD
TUS
CA
N R
D
34
40
34
29
3936
262729
46
47 39 43 4323
2423
45
35
29
4422
23
22
45 42
24
43
3941
29