1083ch5_8

download 1083ch5_8

of 4

Transcript of 1083ch5_8

  • 7/27/2019 1083ch5_8

    1/4

    762

    5.8 High-Pressure Sensors

    B. G. LIPTK (1969, 1982, 1995, 2003)

    Types and Ranges: A. Optical (Section 5.7), up to 60,000 PSIG (4338 bars)

    B. Piezoelectric (Section 5.7), up to 100,000 PSIG (6896 bars)

    C. Magnetic (Section 5.7), up to 100,000 PSIG (6896 bars)

    D. Dead-weight testers, up to 100,000 PSIG (6896 bars)

    E. Helical Bourdon (Section 5.4), up to 100,000 PSIG (6896 bars)

    F. Manganin cells, up to 400,000 PSIG (27,586 bars) or more

    G. Strain gauge (Section 5.7), up to 200,000 PSIG (13,793 bars)

    H. Bulk modulus cells, up to 200,000 PSIG (13,793 bars)

    I. Button type pressure repeater, up to 10,000 PSIG (6896 bars)

    Inaccuracy: For dead-weight testers, 0.1% of span or better; for strain gauges from about 0.1%

    of span to 0.25% of full scale, for Manganin cells from 0.1 to 0.5% of full scale; for

    pressure repeaters 0.5 to 1% full scale, for helical bourdon tubes 1% of span; for

    bulk modulus cells from 1 to 2% of full span

    Costs: For types A, B, C, and G, see Section 5.7; for type E, see Section 5.4. Most transducers

    are from $300 to $500. The simplest dead-weight gauges with moderate ranges and

    0.1% inaccuracy cost around $1200 to $1500; the average portable pressure/vacuum

    calibrator costs around $5000; the most sophisticated 0.03% hydraulic calibrator units

    cost about $18,000.

    Partial List of Suppliers: 3D Instruments LLD (D) (www.3dinstruments.com)ABB Automation Technology (E) (www.abb.com)

    Ametek Inc. (D, E) (www.ametekusg.com)

    Ametek Drexelbrook (G) (www.drexelbrook.com)

    Barber Colman Industrial (G) (www.barber-colman.com)

    Barksdale (G) (www.barksdale.com)

    Barton Instrument (G) (www.barton-instruments.com)

    Cosa Instrument (D) (www.cosa-instrument.com)

    DH Instruments (D) (www.dhinstruments.com)

    Dresser Instrument (A, D, E, G) (www.dresserinstruments.com)

    Druck Inc. (B, G) (www.pressure.com)

    Dwyer Instruments (G) (www.dwyer-inst.com)

    Entran Devices Inc. (G) (www.entran.com)

    Fisher Controls Int., a Div. of Emerson Process Management (E)(www.emersonprocess.com)

    Foxboro-Invensys (E, F) (www.foxboro.com)

    Helicoid Instruments Div. of Bristol Babcock (E) (www.bristolbabcock.com)

    Honeywell Inc. (E) (www.honeywell.com)

    Kistler-Morse (G)

    Marsh Instrument Co. (E) (www.marshbellofram.com)

    Marshalltown Instruments Inc. (E) (www.marshbellofram.com)

    Mensor Corp. (B, E, quartz helix) (www.e-pressure.com)

    Mid-West Instrument (E) (www.midwestinstrument.com)

    MKS Instruments (D) (www.mksinst.com)

    Morehouse Instrument (D)

    Moeller Instrument Co. (E) (www.moellerinstrument.com)

    Moore Products, now part of Siemens Inc. (E) (www.sea.siemens.com)

    PI High

    Flow Sheet Symbol

    2003 by Bla Liptk

    http://1083ch5_7.pdf/http://1083ch5_4.pdf/http://www.3dinstruments.com/http://www.3dinstruments.com/http://www.abb.com/http://www.ametekusg.com/http://www.drexelbrook.com/http://www.barbercolman.com/http://www.barksdale.com/http://www.c-a-m.com/http://www.cosa-instrument.com/http://www.dhinstruments.com/http://www.dresserinstruments.com/http://www.dresserinstruments.com/http://www.gesensing.com/http://www.dwyer-inst.com/http://www.entran.com/http://www.emersonprocess.com/http://www.foxboro.com/http://www.bristolbabcock.com/http://www.honeywell.com/http://www.marshbellofram.com/http://www.marshbellofram.com/http://www.e-pressure.com/http://www.midwestinstrument.com/http://www.mksinst.com/http://www.moellerinstrument.com/http://www2.sea.siemens.com/http://1083ch5_4.pdf/http://1083ch5_7.pdf/http://www2.sea.siemens.com/http://www.moellerinstrument.com/http://www.mksinst.com/http://www.midwestinstrument.com/http://www.e-pressure.com/http://www.marshbellofram.com/http://www.marshbellofram.com/http://www.honeywell.com/http://www.bristolbabcock.com/http://www.foxboro.com/http://www.emersonprocess.com/http://www.entran.com/http://www.dwyer-inst.com/http://www.gesensing.com/http://www.dresserinstruments.com/http://www.dhinstruments.com/http://www.cosa-instrument.com/http://www.c-a-m.com/http://www.barksdale.com/http://www.barbercolman.com/http://www.drexelbrook.com/http://www.ametekusg.com/http://www.abb.com/http://www.3dinstruments.com/
  • 7/27/2019 1083ch5_8

    2/4

    5.8 High-Pressure Sensors 763

    Noshok Inc. (E) (www.noshok.com)

    OCI Instruments Inc. (E) (www.ociinstruments.com)

    Palmer Instruments Inc. (E) (www.palmerinstruments.com)

    Perma-Cal Corp. (E) (www.perma-cal.com)

    Reotemp Instrument (D) (www.reotemp.com)

    Rosemount Inc., a Div. of Emerson Process Management (E)

    (www.emersonprocess.com)

    Ruska Instrument (D) (www.ruska.com)Scanivalve Corp. (G) (www.scanivalve.com)

    Senso-Metrics Inc. (G) (www.senso-metrics.com)

    Sensotec (G) (www.senso-metrics.com)

    Smar International (D) (www.smar.com)

    H.O. Trerice Co. (E) (www.hotrerice.com)

    Vaisala Inc. (D) (www.vaisala.com)

    Validyne Engineering Corp. (E) (www.validyne.com)

    Viatran Corp. (G) (www.viatran.com)

    Wallace & Tiernan (D) (www.wallace-tiernan.com)

    Wallace & Tiernan Inc. (E) (www.usfwt.com)

    Weiss Instruments Inc. (E) (www.weissinstruments.com)

    Weksler Instruments Corp. (E) (www.dresserinstruments.com)

    Wika Instrument Corp. (E) (www.wika.com)

    Yokogawa Corp. of America (E) (www.yca.com)

    The term high pressure is relative, because in an average

    plant the pressure of 1,000 PSIG (69 bars) is usually consid-ered to be high, while in synthetic diamond manufacturing

    100,000 PSIG is viewed as normal. For the purposes of this

    section, we will define high-pressure instruments as devices

    that are capable of measuring pressures in excess of 10,000

    to 20,000 PSIG (700 to 1,400 bars). Some of these detectorshave already been discussed in Section 5.4 (helical Bourdons)

    and in Section 5.7 (strain gauge, optical, piezoelectric, and

    magnetic types). Therefore, in this section the emphasis will

    be on the description of dead-weight piston gauges, bulkmodulus, and Manganin cells.

    INTRODUCTION

    High pressure can be measured by:

    1. Dead-weight testers

    2. Pressure repeaters

    3. Elastic deformation gauges, such as helical bourdon

    tubes, strain gauges, or bulk modulus cells

    4. Detecting the change in electrical resistance in mate-

    rials like Manganin

    One might group these sensors by other characteristics, such as:

    1. Mechanical, such as pressure repeaters, helical bour-

    don tubes, or dead weight testers

    2. Electronic, like the strain gauge devices

    3. Very high pressure detectors, as the bulk modulus andthe Manganin cells.

    The only primary high-pressure detector is the dead

    weight sensor, which is also a rather slow measuring device.

    The sensors that detect elastic deformation follow Hokes

    Law but not with absolute accuracy and all have at least 0.1%

    hysteresis. The Manganin gauge was first described by theNobel prize winning physicist Bridgman

    1who recommended

    it as a secondary gauge.

    MECHANICAL HIGH PRESSURE SENSORS

    Dead-Weight Piston Gauges

    As illustrated in Figure 5.8a, these are piston gauges in whichthe test pressure is balanced against a known weight that is

    applied to a known piston area. The test pressure is applied

    by the secondary piston. The principal purpose of these

    free-piston gauges is as a primary standard to calibrate other

    pressure sensors. The National Bureau of Standards (NBS)has been using these devices for many years.

    Piston gauges, or dead-weight testers, are normally pro-

    vided with a number of interchangeable piston assemblies

    and NBS-certified weights. They can be used to calibrate at

    pressure levels as low as 5 PSIG (35 kPa) or as high as

    FIG. 5.8a

    Dead-weight piston tester.

    Dead

    Weight

    Primary PistonGauge

    under TestCylinder

    Screw

    Secondary

    Piston

    2003 by Bla Liptk

    http://www.noshok.com/http://www.ociinstruments.com/http://www.palmerwahl.com/http://www.perma-cal.com/http://www.perma-cal.com/http://www.perma-cal.com/http://www.reotemp.com/http://www.emersonprocess.com/http://www.gesensing.com/http://www.scanivalve.com/http://www.senso-metrics.com/http://www.senso-metrics.com/http://www.senso-metrics.com/http://www.smar.com/http://www.hotrerice.com/http://www.vaisala.com/http://www.validyne.com/http://www.viatran.com/http://www.wallace-tiernan.com/http://www.wallace-tiernan.com/http://www.usfwt.com/http://www.usfwt.com/http://www.weissinstruments.com/http://www.dresserinstruments.com/http://www.wika.com/http://www.yca.com/http://1083ch5_4.pdf/http://1083ch5_7.pdf/http://1083ch5_7.pdf/http://1083ch5_4.pdf/http://www.yca.com/http://www.wika.com/http://www.dresserinstruments.com/http://www.weissinstruments.com/http://www.usfwt.com/http://www.wallace-tiernan.com/http://www.viatran.com/http://www.validyne.com/http://www.vaisala.com/http://www.hotrerice.com/http://www.smar.com/http://www.senso-metrics.com/http://www.senso-metrics.com/http://www.scanivalve.com/http://www.gesensing.com/http://www.emersonprocess.com/http://www.reotemp.com/http://www.perma-cal.com/http://www.palmerwahl.com/http://www.ociinstruments.com/http://www.noshok.com/
  • 7/27/2019 1083ch5_8

    3/4

    764 Pressure Measurement

    100,000 PSIG (690 MPa). The range has been extended to

    even greater pressures, but research on piston and cylinder

    material and their treatment to withstand loads is a limitation.

    Assuming that one wants to generate a pressure of 100,000

    PSIG while keeping the dead weight under 1000 lb (450 kg),

    it is necessary to reduce the piston area to 0.01 in2

    (6.4 mm2).

    This means that a 0.1 in. (2.5 mm) diameter piston will have

    to support a 1000 lb weight, while also being rotated.

    The accuracy of dead-weight piston testers has improved

    over the years. For higher pressure services, the main

    improvement resulted from controlling the piston-cylinder

    clearance by pressurizing the outside surface of the cylinder.

    Thus, the piston-cylinder clearance is kept constant, resulting

    in a slow rate of fall for the piston unaffected by pressure

    level. The laboratory piston gauges are standardized by NBS,

    calibrating the associated weights and measuring the piston

    diameter. NBS has found these dead-weight testers to be inac-

    curate to 1.5 parts in 10,000 of the measured pressure at values

    greater than 40,000 PSIG (280 MPa) and to 5 parts in 100,000

    at lower pressures. The inaccuracy of industrial dead weight

    testers is better than 0.1% of span.

    The free-piston gauge is limited to its principal purpose,

    a primary standard for calibrating other pressure sensors,

    because it is slow in response and is not practical for direct

    industrial installation.

    The utility of the high-accuracy piston gauges is being

    extended to the lower pressure ranges by the titling-type, air-

    lubricated designs. With such design, pressures (and pressure

    differentials) in the millimeter of mercury range have been

    detected to one part in 100,000 full-scale error.

    Button-Type Pressure Repeater

    This instrument (Figure 5.8b) is discussed in more detail in

    Section 5.12. It has been developed for extruder monitoring

    and control in the plastics and synthetic fiber industries. It

    can repeat the process pressures within an error of 0.5 to 1%,

    and it can operate up to 10,000 PSIG (69 MPa) and at tem-

    peratures up to 800F (430C).

    Helical Bourdon

    The detailed features of this instrument (Figure 5.8c) are

    discussed in Section 5.4. The helical elements used in thisinstrument are available with spans up to 0 to 80,000 PSIG

    (0 to 550 MPa) and can detect pressures with an error of

    about 1% of span.

    BULK MODULUS CELLS

    These cells, shown in Figure 5.8d, are comprised of a hollow

    cylindrical steel probe closed at the inner end, and a stem that

    projects beyond the outer end of the probe. When subjected

    to process pressures, the active part of the probe contracts

    isotropically, causing its tip to be displaced to the right. As a

    result, the stem moves outward, increasing the distance it

    projects beyond the outer end. The stem motion can be detected

    by electromagnetic pickup, capacitance pickup, or the use of

    mechanical displacement transmitters (pneumatic or electronic).

    The unit is available with ranges of 050,000 to 0200,000

    PSIG (0350 to 01,400 MPa), and its inaccuracy is 1 to 2%

    of full scale. Its advantages, when compared with other high-

    pressure sensors, include its relatively fast response, its

    remote-reading characteristic, and its design that is absolutely

    FIG. 5.8b

    Button-diaphragm-type pressure repeater.

    FIG. 5.8c

    Helical Bourdon-type pressure sensor.

    FIG. 5.8d

    Bulk modulus cell.

    Output

    Air Signal (P2) Balancing

    Diaphragm

    A2

    A1

    P1P2 =

    P1 A1 = P2 A2

    Air Supply Vent

    Force Bar

    Regulating

    Valve

    SensingDiaphragm

    ThereforeA1A2

    P1

    200(P1)

    Process

    Pressure

    Moving

    Tip

    Pressure Stem

    Probe Cell

    Body

    Packing

    2003 by Bla Liptk

    http://1083ch5_12.pdf/http://1083ch5_4.pdf/http://1083ch5_4.pdf/http://1083ch5_12.pdf/
  • 7/27/2019 1083ch5_8

    4/4

    5.8 High-Pressure Sensors 765

    safe because the probe is not subject to fatigue. The hyster-

    esis and temperature sensitivity of the bulk modulus cell are

    similar to those of other elastic element pressure sensors.

    PRESSURE-SENSITIVE WIRES

    The electric resistance of wires can be changed by applying

    linear strain or by applying hydrostatic pressure to the surface

    of a helically wound coil mounted on a core. This second

    approach is utilized in the operation of the Manganin or gold-chromium wire type pressure sensors. These materials have

    been selected because their electric resistance changes very

    little with temperature variations, while it does change appre-

    ciably with changes in the applied process pressure.

    When a small coil of Manganin wire is subjected to high-

    process pressures, the coil resistance changes linearly withpressure. The pressure-resistance relationship for Manganin

    is substantial, positive, and linear, and therefore can bedetected by a bridge. Manganin is relatively insensitive to

    temperature variations.

    These cells can be obtained with ranges from 0 to 50,000

    PSIG (0 to 3,450 bars) to 0 to 425,000 PSIG (0 to 29,300bars), and their inaccuracy is between

    1/10 and

    1/2% of full

    scale.

    The main disadvantage of this cell is its delicate nature.

    Both the gauge coils and the coil protection bellows can be

    easily damaged by rapid changes in pressure or liquid viscosity.

    The pressure-resistance relationship of other materials,such as platinum, gold-chromium, or lead, have some of the

    same desirable features as Manganin, and they too have beenused as elements in pressure-resistance cells.

    CHANGE-OF-STATE DETECTION

    One other method for high-pressure sensing is to determine

    the pressure at which change-of-state occurs in various mate-rials and then to apply that as a standard. Some of the change-

    of-state points have already been determined. For example, it

    has been established that the melting point of mercury at 0C

    is 109,765 30 PSIG (757 0.2 MPa). Similarly, the first

    polymorphic transition point of bismuth has been found to bebetween 365,000 and 370,000 PSIG (2519 and 2553 MPa).

    DYNAMIC SENSORS

    The interest in dynamic pressure measurement to detect blast

    pressures, rapid chemical reactions, combustion pressures of

    rocket propellants, and so on has increased in recent years.

    Several electronic transducers have been developed for usewith elastic elements. Because these devices were covered

    in Section 5.7, only a brief listing will be given here.

    Electronic transducers for dynamic pressure detection

    include the piezoelectric transducers; the bonded and

    unbonded strain gauge elements; and the variable reluctance,

    differential transformer, and electrical capacitance types.

    Strain gauges bonded to diaphragm or bellows elements

    have given good performance in measuring blast pressures.

    In connection with underwater explosions and noises, piezo-

    electric crystals have been successfully used. These units are

    directionally sensitive to force, necessitating a seal interposed

    between the element and the process and converting pressure

    to force for optimum response.

    Reference

    1. Bridgman, P.W., Physics of High Pressure, London: G. Bell & Sons,

    Ltd., New York: MacMillan, 1952.

    Bibliography

    Babichev, G.G., Kozlovskiy, S.I., Romanov, V.A., and Sharan, N.N., Pres-

    sure Transducers with Frequency Output on the Base of Strain-

    Sensitive Unijunction Transistors, Paper 2.31, 1st IEEE Interna-

    tional Conference on Sensors (IEEE Sensors 2002), Orlando, FL,

    June 2002.

    Bailey, S.J., Pressure Sensors and Transmitters Affected by Technological

    Change, Control Engineering, January 1984.

    von Beckerath, A., Eberlein, A., Julien, H., Kerstein, P., and Kreutzer, J.,

    WIKA Handbook on Pressure and Temperature Measurement, U.S. ed.,

    Lawrenceville, GA: Wika Instrument Corp., 1998.

    Bourdon Pressure Gauges, Measurements and Control, December 1991.

    Buckon, L., Considerations in Selecting a Pressure Calibration Device,

    Paper #910449, Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society,

    1991.

    Budenberg, G.F., Dead Weight Pressure Measurement, Instruments and

    Control Systems, February 1971.

    Comber, J. and Hockman, P., Pressure Monitoring: Whats Happening?

    Instruments and Control Systems, April 1980.

    Demorest, W.J., Pressure Measurement, Chemical Engineering, September

    30, 1985.

    Hall, J., Monitoring Pressure with Newer Technologies, Instruments and

    Control Systems, April 1979.

    Hughes, T.A., Pressure Measurement, EMC series, downloadable PDF,

    Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, Research Triangle

    Park, NC, 2002.

    Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, Industrial Measure-

    ment Series: Pressure (video VHS, PAL & NTSC), Research Triangle

    Park, NC, 2002.

    Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, Pressure: Indicators

    and Transmitters, CD-ROM, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2002.

    Johnson, D., Pressure Sensing: Its Everywhere, Control Engineering,

    April 2001.

    Kaminski, R.K., Measuring High Pressures Above 20,000 PSIG, Instru-

    mentation Technology, August 1968.

    Lewis, J.D., Pressure Sensing: A Practical Primer, InTech, December

    1990.

    Marrano, S.J., How to Choose and Apply Pressure Transmitters, Control,

    March 2000.

    Merritt, R., Keeping Up With Pressure Sensors,Instruments and Control

    Systems, April 1982.

    2003 by Bla Liptk

    http://1083ch5_7.pdf/http://1083ch5_7.pdf/