101676677 the Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 1 of 5 Fully Searchable Text

8/15/2019 101676677 the Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 1 of 5 Fully Searchable Text

1/62

THEENERGY MACHINE

OFJOSEPH NEWMAN

byJoseph Westley Newman

An Invention Whose Time Has Come

W rit ten and publ ished by Jos eph W . New ma n(Edited by Euan R. Soule , Jr.)NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA


2/62

DEDICATED TO ALL THE PEOPLES OF THEWORLD WHO LIVE AND ARE YET TO BE BORN


3/62


4/62

AUTHOR'S NOTEI urge the reader to read this Book in its entirety, in the sequ ence o f its dev elop m ent and pres entati

dev elo pe d logical ly f rom on e con cep t to the nex t — just as I or iginal ly inno vate d cep ts wh ich led to the creat ion of m y energy m achin e . By skipp ing throu gh th e Book , the reader ru

a proper comprehen sion of the The ory itseI a lso wish to assure the reader that the Editor and I are aware of accepted grammatical customs

In Chapter On e, I ut i lize a quo ta t io n f rom James C lerk Maxw ell regarding th e mecha nical nat ure ognetic field in w hi ch he said: " In sp eaki ng of the Energy of the field, how ev er, I wish to

as not been taken literally. In fact, this statement by Maxwell has been literally ignored by those wlowed h im. Pe rhaps James Clerk Maxwel l ' s s ta tement w ould not hav e been ignored or over look ed h I WISH TO BE UNDERSTOOD LITERALLY with greater s tyl is t ic emphasis .

By intentionally "breaking" the f low of information ( to the reader) with the use of quota t ion marenth eses , I am stylis tical ly enco urag ing the read er to pro cee d carefully an d "M aster" w hat I tea

The term "Master" should connote to the reader the same meaning as the his tor ica l dis t incteen "M aste r" and "A ppre nt ice . " P lease und ers tand tha t I do no t in tend the te rm to havgato ry im plica t ion to the reader . This is s imply m y wa y of enc oura gin g the reader to u nd ersta

— what is presented in this Book.My un or th od ox trea tm ent of cer ta in wor ds and gramm atical devices is inte nd ed to par tia lly co unt

holog ical ef fec ts of a teaching system w hich of ten rew ards mem orizat ion an d ignores

I must s tress that my purpose is not in any way to condemn or quest ion the inte l lec tual abi l i ty of My sincere purp os e is to quest io n and im pro ve the opera t ion al natu re of the education al syst

M lTHE ENERGY MACHINE OF JOSEPH NEWMAN


5/62

NOTE:Those who understand the essential nature of Mr. Newman's energy machine may claim that its des

are very ' simple and obv iou s" - but only after they are unde rstood. The wheel is "simple vio us," b ut it is nevertheless a very important inv ention that revolutionized ou r develop m ent aOn e might ask: "Wh y was the wheel not obv ious ' to the countless hum an beings w ho li Morgenstern answers

"The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply. "

Soule'.Jr. wishes to express h is grat i tude to physicis t Andre wJ. Galamhos for bringing to h is at ten tion the above quo tation by Chr is tMorgenstern , and for sensitizing him to the nature of innovation via a prop er perspe ctive for that w-hich is "o b v io u s . " Professor Galamboactually re-stated Morgenstern's q u o ta t io n : "The obvious is that which is nerer understood until someone expresses it simply. "|Professor Ga lamb os was orig inally informed of the Morgenstern qu otatio n by Mr. Je rom e Sm ith . |ix

THE ENERGY MACHINE OF JOSEPH NEWMAN


6/62

Acknowledgements wish to expres s my deepest thanks and love to my Dear Wife, Margaret Ellen Green Newman, who ha

m y w ork a bov e all else. She has bee n an d is the perfect wife for me. Her beautynd fam ed c oo kin g abili ty hav e bee n an additional asset to m y efforts. My love for h e

ith her is multiplied by ou r you ng son — Gyrom as — of tw o years . I have nam ed my son after m yrk and for h im I have w ri t ten a song co nce rning his special name w hich I sing to him to inspire and

T o Mr. Garland R obinette I ow e a special thank s and my respect. As a top new s anch orm an with WWL-TVNew O rleans, Mr. Ro bine tte has co nd uc te d himself in a m ore scientific ma nn er with re spect to

triggered the involve men t of o t h e r news media and scientists , but his work also led to on facts, no t wild speculation , biases, and pre judices. Mr. Ro binette is

plim en t and asset to his profes sion. In add ition, Mr. Ro bine tte is a very special person w ho t ru ly care the benefits of my Invention to you, the People.

To Mr. Evan Sou le' , Jr. — a talented teacher and artist in New Orleans — I also o w e special thanks an all the f in ished draw ings which are extremely pro

ara tion, an d pro du cti on of this Book in order to enab le it to be as app ealing as possible to th with his pen agains t som e of my u nscru pulou s adversaries . H

. Soule ' is a special person w ho c ont inu ously wo rks on behalf of my innova t ions bec om ing People.I wish to sincerely thank and give respect to the numerous scientifically-educated individuals l isted i

pter Seve n wh o had th e Scientific Coura ge to speak ou t on my behalf w he n it was not fashionable. A these individuals are a compliment to the word "Scient is t . "My very special thanks to Dr. Robert Smith of NASA, Dr. Roger Hastings of Sperry-Univac, and

— who spoke out first .Joseph Westley Newm an

XITHE ENERGY MACHINE OF JOSEPH NEWMAN


7/62

Table of Contents1. TH E P ROP ER HIS TORICAL P ERS PECTIVE 12 . G Y R O S C O P I C A C T I O N S 43. TECHNICAL DES CRIP T ION O F DRA WING S 124. EXPLANATION F O R A W O R K I N G I N V E N T I O N 155. DECLARATION BY DR . RO GE R HAS TINGS

F O L L O W I N G E X TE N SI VE T E S T IN G O N 5,000 A N D 900 LB. UN ITS 226. DE SCR IPTIO N O F SMALLER UN IT

W I T H A N A FF ID A V I T B Y DR . RO GER HAS T INGS 367 . ADD ITIONAL AF F IDAVITS 408. A N A L O G I E S USEFUL IN U N D E R S T A N D IN G T H E T E C H N IC A L SYSTEM 499. EXPLANATION O F INTERNAL A C T I O N W I T H I N M Y

E N E R G Y M A C H I N E A N D D I S C U S S IO N O F C O M M U T A T O R D E S I G N S 6010. QU AN TU M MEC HAN ICS 7111. LI G H T 7412. US EF UL " W O RK , F ORCE , A N D POWER E Q U A T I O N S 8013. T H E STATIC EM BOD IMEN T (ENERGY MACHINE) 814. EF F ECTS DEM ONS T RATE D B Y PARTICLES

W I T H I N E L E C T R O M A G N E T I C FI EL D S 815. TH E GA S EM BO DIM EN T (ENERGY MACH INE) 816. GR AV ITY 9117. INERTIA 9618. HEA T AN D TH E TH REE LAWS O F THER MO DYN AM ICS 1019. A ST RO NO M Y 1122 0 . A C H I E V E M E N T VS. APATHY 1521. THE P R O P E R TEA CH ING SYSTEM 2322. R E C O M M E N D E D P R O O F O F G O D S E X IS T EN C E 242 3. TH E MERGER BETW EEN MECH ANIZATION AN D ECO NO MIC S 252 4 . TH E P ATENT S YSTEM 2 525. T H E JUDICIA L SYSTEM . . 27


8/62

E PROPER HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

"I cannot conceive curved lines of force without the conditions of a physical existence in thatintermediate space.' — Michael Faraday

my search for Absolute Truth over the last ninete en I have often quest ioned why the conclusions Iy teachings w ere not in accor d with the scien

The difference lies in the fact that during the lastty- three years I have ma de m y l ivel ihood solelym inven ting. This is a profess ion that req uires contin creative thought concerning realistic improvements.

In contrast , the present teaching system from grammar memorization. Thestuden t is in mem orizing the textbo oks

The progress of our human species is dependent upon undergoing a process of continuing physical All tech nical ly-ori ented individuals hav e a

a scientific co nc ept will pre ced e the scientific

The facts relative to the history of the advancement in — medicine , physics , chem istry , — clearly that because a subject matter is taught in accord

However, even at th is la te date many individuals the scientif ic community and other technical in-uals have clearly take n the pos ition that anyth ing in a given instant in time is fact.If there w ere any m eri t to such a bl ind at t i tude, th en Earth would be flat and it would also be the center the Universe , because such a "b el ie f was rig idly in past years. Actually, the present electric motorgenerator would not exist because, prior to 1820, thechings a t that t ime s ta ted that there was no connec-between magnetism and electr ic i ty .There are now and have been those who have bl indly

n the position that there is no credibility to mycvhnical Process which describes my Pioneering Inven

tion of Patent Application Number 179,474. Especiallyper tine nt is the fact that I have de scrib ed in ext ensiv edetail how a magnetic field consists of particles with amechan ica l , gyroscop ic-type action which can beunderstood and predicted and which occurs a t the spof l ight . Furthermore, the energy in a mag netic field the energy which comprises the atoms of the materiafrom which the energy comes and is literally EinsteiEquation ofE = MC2. Co nsequ ently , the mass ( in theform of a gyroscopic particle) must move in a givendirection at C, or the speed of light, and it must alsospin at the speed of light.

"The energy in a magn etic field is theenergy which comprises the atoms of thmaterial from which the energy comes anis literally Einstein's Equ ation ofE = MCI wish to pay tribute to Michael Faraday, whose wostimulated my search, a nd to Jam es Clerk Maxwell . Bof these great scientists have seen even farther into th

future in a way in which they have yet to receive fullcredit and recognit ion.The fol lowing facts concerning these prest ig ious mwe re disco vere d by m e many years after I had originabegun my search:The fol lowing quota t ions are from a book enti t led

Michael Faraday by L. Pearce Williams [published byChapman and Hall, Ltd., London, 1965]. Essentially,Michael Faraday understood the lines of force as realphysical entities. His position was not shared by mostother scientists of that time. This caused Faraday toremark on November 7 , 1855:" How few understand the physical lines of forceThey will not see them, yet all the researches on thsubject ten d to confirm the views I put forth manyyears since. Thompson of Glasgow seems almostthe only one who acknowledges them. He isperhaps the nearest to understanding what Imeant. I am content to wait convinced as I am ofthe truth of my views.'' (page 507)

In correspondence between Michael Faraday andJames Clerk Maxwell, Faraday disagreed at one pointi


9/62


10/62

in any other form. The energy in electromagneticphenomena is mechanical energy. The onlyquestion is, Where does it reside? On the oldtheories it resides in the electrified bodies, conducting circuits and magnets, in the form of anunknow n quality called potential energy, or thepower of producing certain effects at a distance.On our theory it resides in the electroma gneticfield, in the space surround ing the electrifiedand magnetic bodies, as well as in those bodiesthemselves , and is in two different forms, whichmay be described without hypothesis as magneticpolarization and electric polarization, or, according to a very probable hypothesis, as themotion and strain of one and the samemedium. ' " (Emphasis added.)

It is obvious from the above facts that Maxwell matter-in-motion in a magnetic and that there was som e type of mec hanical pro p electromagnetic

I was in the same intellectual posit ion during March,erator . At that t ime, I also conclu ded that a magne t ic

concluded that these par t icles moved at the speedlight. Ho we ve r, l ike Faraday an d Maxw ell , I cou ld not

sight, and, as a result , still teaches the old theory whMaxwel l refer red to as: " the form of an unknown quty cal led potent ial energy, or the power of producincer tain ef fects at a distance."[I will discuss in this Book the actual nature of "potet ia l" energy as opposed to kinet ic energy. ]

The above facts clear ly show that two of the mostprest igious men of science — before the fact — alreendorsed a basic tenet of my Disclosures. The abovequotations, the factual results that will be presented this Book, and the fact that as of this writ ing over th(30) ex trem ely qualified, scientif ically-minde d indiviuals have put for th statements ver i fying that my techlogical prototypes have a greater energy output thanternal energy input into my system, most cer tainly ocome the object ions of mere disbel ief on the par t ofo ther s who have not s tudied my concept s .I t is obvious that neither Maxwell or Faraday coulmechanical ly explain or prove the existence of theseparticles, wh ich I will discus s in this Boo k, no r did t

under s t and or openly predic t how one could obta ingreater energy from a mass or magnetic f ield than thenergy put into the system. Yet , these great men inst ively laid the ground work of endorsement for anywho could mechanical ly explain these par t icles andtherefore expand upon the i r own s incere and dedicaeffor ts to provide a mechanical explanat ion for elec-t romagnet i sm.I have accompl i shed th i s under s t anding and muchmore. By thei r statement*, Faraday and Maxwell hav

In speaking of the Energy of the field, however, I wish to be understood literally. Theenergy in electromagnetic phenomena is mechanical energy." — Jam es Clerk Maxw

befo re on e cou ld efficientlys their energy . I eagerly acce pte d this massive

Field Theory which was no longer only a theoryt a Technica l Process which demonst r a t es and t eachesdi sc losu re of a new sou rce of energ y a ndso dis close d in this Book .It is historically apparent that because Faraday and could not prove or mechanical ly explain these par t icles, the present scient i f ic communi ty hast grasped the essence of Maxwel l ' s and Faraday's in-

fect ively endorsed a basic tenet of my Disclosures bthe fact , even though they had no expl ici t , mechanicexplanat ion for thei r statements.The impor tance, or iginal i ty, and factual corrobora

of my Disclosure will speak for itself.SURELY I AM ENTITLED TO PIONEERING PATEPROTECTION FOR THIS REVOLUTIONARY INVENT

applicat ion is a contin uation-in -part of the pr ior copending ap Serial No. 110,834, filed Jan uar y 9, 1980, which in turn iscon tinuation -in-part of prior patent applicat ion Serial No. 23,136,ed March 2 2, 19 79, an d Serial No. 25 ,90 7, filed April 2, 19 79.


11/62

"The way in wh ich Faraday ma de use of h is l ines of force in co-ordina t ing the phenomena of einduct ion shows him to have been a mathemat ic ian of h igh order, and one f rom whommathemat ic ians of the future may der ive valuable and fert i le methods. " — James Clerk Maxw

will begin with the scientific facts concerning my

Anyone who cannot recognize the veraci ty of certa insions that I und erst ood wh en I in i tia lly s tudied

As you read the following list of experimental facts

*

FIGURE 1CONDUCTOR DOWN

^25 *̂-==^®I8Bf*. .1 ^ - — ^ - T i Sw * ~ ^ II »

^ ^ ^ ^ » U - H

Push a cond uc to r wire dow n and th rough a

FIGURE 2

CONDUCTOR UP

. Push a con du cto r up and throu gh a magne tic field atows to the right as dra w n (oppo site to Figure 1 above ).

to new knowledge may be difficult for iho.s

CONDUCTOR DOWN

FIGURE 3

3 . Flip ove r the mag net 180° an d the direct ion of thelectric current flow will be reversed from that ofFigures 1 an d 2 above , a l though the d i rec t ion and mtion of the conductor remain the same (compare Fig3 to Figure 1 and o bse rve o ppo site results) .

FIGURE 4

CONDUCTOR UP & DOWN

4 . P u s h t h e c o n d u c to r "d o w n " o r "u p " in a m o t ioparallel to , and thro ugh the magn etic lines of force:electric current will flow despite a vigorous or energetic pushing effort.

FIGURE 5

5 . Ho we ver, a l though the co ndu cto r can be very s lly pushed at right angles to the magnetic lines of forthe resulting electric current will move at the speed light.IHE I'.M'.RGY MACHINE OF JOSEPH NLWMAN


12/62

FIGURE 6

CONDUCTOR UP

The condu ctor can be disconnected from the am 180°, reconnected to the am meter of the conductor through,d at right angles to the magnetic lines of force (as in 1-3). Identical results of the electric current be observed even though the condu ctor 5 and 6: the in Figure 6 has been flipped over 180° from of Figure 5, yet the direction of curre nt flow is

The conv entiona l teachings wo uld suggest that the a result of in the condu ctor and that nothing camethe magn etic field. Also, convention al teachings the ma gnetic lines of force are imaginary, of Potential Energy and no Kinetic Energy.s claim was b elieved to be justified because no cur in a magnetic field. There is no merit to this

a con duc tor parallel to magnetic lines of force

As 1 studied the above facts of Faraday's Generator,concluded that the conventional teachings of No. 7 a conclusion by Fara- Generator. Facts 1 -6 above clearly prov ed to me that a field consists of:. particles which have mechanical characteristics. I myself, "How else could these particles 'know'

to travel and why else would the direction current flow be so dependen t upon the magneticand totally indep endent of the conductor itself?"L particles mov ing at the speed of light within thenetic field. The facts prove to me that one did notthe velocity of light to electric curre nt flow by a conductor slowly through a mag netic field. the facts dem onstrated that the resulting elec- current flow consisted of an entity which alreadyeled at the spe ed of light. The slow movement ofconductor at right angles to that entity had simplyhanically deflected the particle from it̂ normal to that of a bullet b eing a metal plate or body of water at

the proper angle which results in the bullet beingdeflected from its original path.)However, I was still puzz led. 1 asked myself, "Whdid the up and down motion of the deflecting conductor produce opposite-direction deflection of thismechanically-natured particle which moved at thespeed of light? W hy did the deflection reverse w henthe magnet was flipped over 180°? And why, whenthe condu ctor moved parallel to these mechanically-natured particles (which were moving at the speed olight), was no current flow p rod uce d?" This latterquestion indicated to me that no prop er deflection othe particles occurred in the mechanical position offorce of the condu ctor.

Also, I asked myself, "When the conductor was mtionless in the magnetic field (consisting of particleswith mechanical characteristics and moving at thespeed of light), why was no current flow produced?This observation indicated that there was no properdeflection of the particles oc curring in the mechanicposition of the conducto r.

10. S u m m a t i o n o f m y t h o u g h t s in the ea r ly monof 1965:Faraday had invented an important invention — telectric generator — but he had invented an inefficieinvention because one always obtained less energyfrom a system than the energy put into that system:yet, the facts clearly showed that the system consisteof an orderly flow of Kinetic E nergy. This KineticEnergy consists of a mechanically-oriented particlewhich moves at the speed of light. T herefore I knewthat in order to construc t the prop er technologicalmechanism which could utilize this energy, I mustsimply und erstand th e essence of the entire system .In addition to making my living by other successfuinventions, the next three years consisted of thousanof hours of testing, studying , and thinking to searchthe truth concerning the nature of this mechanically-oriented particle. During this time, the same questiondominated my thoughts: How did the particles of amagnetic field "know" which way to travel? In retrospect, the answer is extremely simple, but seemed vedifficult to me at the time since I had never taken a

physics course and had been teaching myself manyvaried subjects.At this time in my life, i began to work on anotherinvention consisting of a flywheel which acted as a"mechanical storage battery" for a bicycle. Thisflywheel caused the bicycle to automatically react as"wheelie." Such "stored mechanical energy" withinthe flywheel suggested to me the stabilizing influencof a gyroscope . I then became fascinated with understanding the essence of the gyrosc ope and thereafterlearned the answer to the questions dom inating m ythoughts concerning the explicit, mechanical characistics of the particles comprising a magnetic field andtraveling at the speed of light.


13/62

. The se par tic les consis t of a gyro scop ic mecha nica l ac t ion wh ich can be opera t io nal ly (mechanica l ly) u nd ers t ooLet the fol lowing fac ts prov e or dispro ve this Theo ry:

FIGURE 11-ACONDUCTOR DOWN

sTSS^H^vl>^W . . . - i t s .

^ ^ FIGURE 11-A1FORCE DOWN

Move a con du ctor do wn a t a r ight angle to a11-A magnetic field and the current flow moves left.F i g ur e Apply a do wn wa rd force to the axis of a spin11-A1 ning gyr osc op e and it will pivo t at a right angto the force (in this case pivot left). Now imathat this gyroscope has a forward direction at speed of light.

THE ANALOGY OF THE ABOVE TWO EXAMPLES IS SCIENTIFICALLY EXACT

FIGURE 11-B

CONDUCTOR UP

FIGURE 11-B1

Move the con du cto r "u p " a t r ight angles to the11-B magnetic field and the current flows right and

opposite to Figure 11-A above.F i g ur e Apply an up wa rd force to the axis of the spin11-B1 ning gyr osco pe and it wi l l pivo t at right angto the force. In this case , the gyroscope pivo

right and opposi te to Figure 11-Al above . Noimagine tha t this gyroscope has a forward dirtion at the speed of light.

AGAIN, THE ANALOGY OF T HE ABOVE TW O EXAMPLES IS SCIENTIFICALLY EXA CT

FIGURE 11-C CONDUCTOR DOWNc5S^^.L===*^x FIGURE 11-C1FORCE DOWN

Flip the magn ets ov er 180° and repeat th e11-C action s of Figure 11-A abo ve . Th e cur ren t flowdirection will be right and opposite to that ofExample II-A even though the force direction isthe same.

F i g ur e Fl ip the spinn ing gyrosco pe over 180° . Repe11-C1 the actio ns of Figure 11-A1 a b o v e , the gyroscwill pivot at right angles to the force, hut winow pivot right and o pposite to that of Figull-Al above, even thoug h the force direction the same. Now im agine tha t this gy rosc op e hforward direction at the speed of light.AGAIN, THE ANALOGY OF THE ABOVE TWO EXAMPLES IS SCIENTIFICALLY EXACT


14/62

FIGURE 11-D

CONDUCTOR UP

FIGURE 11-D1

FORCE UP

re Repeat the act ions of Figure 1 I B and the current flow ii'i/l he left and opposite to Figure 1 IB eventhough the force direction is the same.F i g u r e Repea t the acti ons of Figure 11-BI: the gyros11- D 1 will pivot at right angles to the force, hut winow pivot left and opposite to Figure 11-B1even though the force direction is the same.Now imagine that this gyroscope has a forwardirection at the speed of l ight.

AGAIN, THE ANALOGY OF THE ABOVE TWO EXAMPLES IS SCIENTIFICALLY EXACT•

FIGURE 11-E*N29

1

i^^T&fc*^CONDUCTOR UP & DOWNX,

t *o*^>

PARALLEL FORCE DOWN

FIGURE 11-E1

PARALLEL FORCE UPu re Move the cond uctor v igorously "u p " and11-E "d o w n " throu gh the magn et ic f ield, maintaining the conductor force parallel to the magne ticlines of force and no current flow will result.

Fi gu re Apply an "u p " and "d ow n" force para ll el t d11-E1 axis of the spinnin g gyro sco pe. Regardless ohow ene rgetically the force is applied, as lonthe force remains p arallel, the gyroscope wilnot pivot eve n thou gh it has a forward m otio

the speed of l ight.AGAIN, THE ANALOGY OF THE ABOVE TWO EXAMPLES IS SCIENTIFICALLY EXACT

"These particles consist of a'gyroscopic mechanical action' whichcan be operationally (mechanically)understood and predicted ". The reason that a stat ionary cond ucto r in a

he fundamental Laws for the Mathematics of Proba

ue to the random motion of the atoms comprisinge conductor. Such action causes a cancellation effect.he same is true if, from all directions, one randomly no t pivot if the random forces are fast .

THE ANALOGY OF THE ABOVE TWO

G . When one brings a conductor ' 'down " or ' up'' right angles to a magnetic field, the random motioof the atoms within the conductor does not affect thsystem because there is a general drift direction ofthe "up" and "down" force applied to the gyroscoparticles co mprising a magnetic field. Th is effect issimilar to an airflow consisting of gas molecules inrandom mot ion wi th in th e airflow, but also possessa general drif t direction which will apply a force to windmill , etc. If the airflow ceases, however , t hewindmill will not turn even though the molecules ogas — while st i l l moving at high velocit ies — arenonetheless in a random motion which cancels theforce applied to all sides of the windmill .The same effect is true if one applies a randomforce to the axis of a gyroscope. If the random forchas a given drift direction of force, the gyroscope wpivot at right angles to that drift directional force.

AGAIN, THE ANALOGY O F THE ABOVE TWOEXAMPLES IS SCIENTIFICALLY EXACT


15/62

this poin t in time, the facts I had a ssem bled hadd cor rect. A ma gne tic field does consist of discrete

dent i f iable charac ter is tics w hichident ica l to those possessed by a gyro scop e . S uch

y this t ime, however , I a lso mechanica l ly expla inedhich I had con ce ived rega rd ing the

W hy, in a mech anica l sense , does a magn et a t t rac t andrepel other magnets?Why, in a mechanica l sense , do e lec tr ic charges a t t rac t

and repel?W hat is the en ergy in a ma gne tic field an d w hat is its

source?Did the energy used in c rea t ing a permanent magnethave any bear ing upon the s t rength or energyconta in ed w ithin a magn et ic field emit ted f romthe permanent magnet once i t was made?2 . In the early part of 1965, I eagerly researc hed the

net. B ecause I instinctiv ely kn ew that if theinput , the n I wo uld k no w I was incorrec t . But if independent of

was cor rect .Upon examining the known fac t s conce rn ing pe rmaagnets , I aga in kn ew I was correc t and such

12A. For a given energy inp ut into varying mater ia ls ofident ica l volume, the genera ted s t rength of the magnetic field varies drastically

FIGURE 12-A1 * SOFT IRON

PRODUCES WEAK, PERMANENT MAGNETIC FIELD

FIGURE 12-A2/\ >. IRON. NICKELAND COBALT \ NS N *» «- s J

PRODUCESSTRONG.PERMANENTMAGNETICFIELD

The same e lec tr ica l energy input c rea ted extremelyvar iable f ie ld s t rength s I therefore ins tant ly kn ew thathe strength of the magnetic field had to be a result ofthe na ture of the a toms compris ing the mater ia l andno t a result of the electrical energy input.12B . Th e fac ts fur ther demo nstra ted tha t the s t rength othe magnet ic f ie ld was observed to increase as morea toms within the mater ia l became a l igned

FIGURE 12-B1 • • D X WEAKX MAGNETIC\ FIELD

FEW ATOMS ALIGNED

/1 ('/' /^r-> N NFIGURE 12-B2 ^ - • • • • D D L l.' / /DDDDDOD

s ^ *• z , «* •- H Z - - ^ /

\

GREATER ATOM A LIGNMENTPRODUCES STRONG MAGNETIC FIELD

FACT B there fore further c or rob or ate d FACT 12-Aabove as be ing correc t .1 2C. Th e facts a lso taught tha t onc e the maxim umatom a l ignment of a given mater ia l was achiev ed,then no amount of e lec tr ica l input would cont inue toincrease the mag net ic field of that material (SeeFigure 12-B2 above.)

I t was obvious to me from this conclus ion tha t thestren gth of the ma gn etic field of a give n material w asnot re la t ive to the e lec tr ica l energy input . Once themax imum atom a l ignment of a mater ia l was achiev edone could increase the energy input 1000 t imes andthe re would be no increase in the strength of themagnet ic f ie ld of the permanent magnet . Therefore ,FACT 12-C fur ther co rrob ora ted FACT 12-A above .12D . Th e facts also taught that if on e too k a pe rm an enmagnet (such as in Figure 12-D1 below) which has as t rong magnet ic f ie ld and hea ted the magnet to i tsCurie tempera ture , the magnet ic f ie ld would vir tua l lydisapp ear (See Figure 12-D2 below .)


16/62


17/62

MAGNETIC FIELDS IN REPULSIONQUALITATIVE REPRESENTATION OF TH E KINETIC ENERGY OF A MAGNETIC FIELD:GYROS COPIC FUNDAMEN TAL PARTICLES SIMULTANEOUSLY ROTA TING( O N AN AXIS CONS ISTING OF A GIV EN "LINE OF FORCE ) AT THESPEED OF L IG H T A N D TR AV E L IN G AT THE SPEED OF L IG H T AL O N GT H E S E L I N E S * OF F O R C E ' IN AC C O R D AN C E W ITH E IN S TE IN ' SE Q U ATIO N OF E = M C * 'ACTUALLY SHELLS OF FORCEIT IS THE GYROSCOPIC SPIN THA T PLAYSTH E MAJ O R R O L E OF ATTRACTION ANDREPULSION IN MAGNETIC FORCES (EXACT- M™,trT,MAAL


18/62

MAGNETIC FIELDS IN ATTRACTIONQUALITATIVE REPRESENTATION OF TH E KINETIC ENERGY OF A MAGNETIC FIELDGYROSCOPIC FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES SIMULTANEOUSLY ROTATING(O N AN AXIS CONS ISTING OF A GIVEN L INE OF FORCE ) AT THESPEED OF L IGHT A ND TRAVELING AT TH E S P E E D OF L IG H T AL O N GT H E S E L IN E S * OF FO R C E " IN AC C O R D AN C E W ITH E IN S TE IN SEQUATION OF E = M C ACTUALLY SHELLS OF FORCEIT IS THE GYROS COPIC SPIN THA T PLAYSTHE MAJOR ROLE OF ATTRACTION AND E SPINNING GYROSCOPIC PARTICLEREPULSION IN MAGNETIC FORCES (EXACT- unJ.ur̂T̂f ST °F * PARTICLELY AS S H O W N IN STATIC ATTRACTION PATH ALONG T H EAND REPULSION SEE PROOF A 1 LINE ISHELLJOF FORCE:

Vi-*-© - ; ; I,' ' ' GYROSCO\ \ \ ^ ^ ^ ' M ' , ' : ' PARTICLE\ \ V < T - - " - : > ' , ' / AT C AND\ \ ~ -~ZZ~-'',' a - x X S P I N A T C\ ' - - . - $=) THEREFORTHE ENERGY WITHIN A MAGNETIC FIELD. IS THE ETHAT MAKES UP THE ATOMS FROM WHICH THE MAFIELD COMES THIS ENERGY IS LITERALLY EINEQUATION E = M C 2 . HENCE, THE ENERGY MUST MOV


19/62

3CAL D ESCRIPTION O F DRAWINGS ". . . it is imposs ib le for anyone to begin to learnwhat he t h inks he a l ready kn ows ."

— Epictetus

, sc r ibed above are the techn ica l d raw ings for onef Joseph New man ' s theor ies . The two drawings MAG NETIC FIELDS IN REP ULSION a n d MAGNETIC

IN ATTR ACTION — desc r ibe th ree bar magne ts inth ree -d imens iona l configura tion su r ro unde d and by c irculat ing gyrosco pic part ic les , each of offeree

in oppos i te the two d rawings is

the central ma gnet is reversed.]Accord ing to Mr. New man , these gyros copic part ic lese the smallest part ic les kno w n and c o m p r i s e all a toms

the un iverse . The technical drawing s are in nature ; quanti ta t ively , there are trillions of

in the describ ed paths the ma gne tic field. Although sub-a tom ic par

be sh ie lded by lead, th e effects of magn etic be obs erve d thro ugh lead shielding. According

is on e proo f that these particles areThese d rawings represen t the first t ime in the his tory

is p r e s e n t e d in an explicit pictorial th e c o n c e p t s i n n o v a t e d by Mr. New man) a

of t h e p h e n o m e n a of and the principle of " a c t i o n at a d is tance ."

his resea rches on magnetism, James Clerk Maxwell (as as Michael F araday) explicitly desc r ibed the lines of a magne t as kinetic, mecha nical (Maxwell cal led e lectrom agnetism "m atte r in

by Maxwell has bee n forgotn in the past 100 years. W hile Maxwell co uld not ex in detail the act ion of a magne t , he did recognize is mechan ica l in nature .

As one passes a c o n d u c to r w i r e in front of and acrosse en d of a bar magne t , one wil l observ e the cu r ren t to in one direct ion , then bec om e neutral , then

in the opp osite direc t ion. This due to the na tu re of the flow of the gyroscop ic

as the y flow from each end of th e bar magnet On one side of the south (S) end bar magne t , for instance, the particles flowing inn d out a long th e " l ines of fo rce" sp in "u p , " whi le on

of t he same sou th end , th e particles flowg in and out a long the " l ines of f o r c e " sp in "d o w n . " A at right angles to the force

it; hence , as the gyro scop ic particles en th e part ic les c omp osing th e con duc tor wire , they

m o v e " u p " or " d o w n " the co nd uc tor (at right anglesthe direction that they first encounter th e co nduc to r )Mr. Newman indicates that it is principally the spin

the gyroscopic part ic le (and not th e direct ion of flowthe gyroscopic part ic les a long the " l ines of force") tde te rmines magne t ic repu ls ion and a t t rac t ion . The iteract ion of the pe r ipher ies of the particles actually fects such repuls ion and attractio n (see PROO F A).Although th e d rawings dep ic t space be tw een th e particles flowing in a given "l ine of fo rce ," in actuality particles are mo re l ike individual spira ls up on a s tranbeads in the shape of a helix which results in a gyroscopic act ion — each partic le bum ping against thenext. [According to Mr. New ma n, be tw een each pacle there is a very small amo unt of space created byelectromagnetic force surrounding each part ic le .]

As t he d rawings dep ic t , the actual "l in es of fo rce"really shells of force wh ic h e n v e lo p the magne ts asdiscrete shells of gyro scop ic part ic les wh ich lie c o n ctr ical ly within other shells . These "l ines of fo rce" (adep ic ted in on e plane on the drawings) or shells of (in actuality) travel (rotate) in opp osite d irect ions reto one another . The effect of such m ot ion is to placper ipher ies of respective gy roscop ic part ic les (from " l ine of fo rce" to the next) at oppos i t ion (or repuls ito one a n o th e r and consequen t ly ke ep each " l ine offorce" separated from each adjoining (concentr ic) "(shell) of fo rce ."In addit ion, there are as many " l ines of fo rce"emanating from each end of the bar magne t as the reatoms al igned magnetical ly across th e wid th and heof the N an d S ends of the magnet . Because of the lsize of iron filings relative to the sub-atom ic s ize ofgyroscop ic pa r t ic les , the part ic les w ithin the " l ine ofo rce" congea l c lumps of th e filings in to (via th e naeye) a relatively few n u m b e r of such l ines . With mofinely-ground iron filings, m or e "li ne s of fo rce" wobecome vis ible to the h u m a n eye.Each particle (M) travels along th e "line (shell) offorce" at the speed of light (C) and also individuallyspins at the speed of light (C). Con seque ntly , such mtion results in energy (E) since E = M CJ .It should also be noted that , based on the theorieMr . Newman, I cons t ruc ted th ree -d imens iona l m odetw o bar m a g n e t s to s tudy how the gyro scop ic part iinteract. Using simple styrofoam (for the bar magn ewire (for the "l ines of force") , and wo o d e n b e a d s (f

12THE ENERGY MACHINE OF JOSEPH NEWMAN


20/62

configuration at the speed of

.] (See Figure 13-G.)

FIGURE 13-G

SPIRAL PATHOF GYROSCOPICPARTICLE

LINEOF FORCE"

The specific spiral motion of the gyroscopic "particle" occurs at the speed oflight and the general forward motion ofthe spiral configuration also occurs at the speedof light. The combined motions of the gyroscopic"particle" constitute energy, i.e., E = MC .

Such spira l mot ion mechanical ly descr ibes what is meantby the express ion "spins at the speed of light."

An interesting observation occurred following cond S pole faces of two m agnets (see Figure 13-Hl) attract

— FIGURE 13-H1

PERIPHERY REPULSION

PERIPHERY REPULSION '

•G- - QUALITATIVE DEPICTION

when placed directly end-to-end, if one shifts the samfaces to the side of one another (keeping them in thesame plane), one will notice that the periphery spin ofthe gyroscop ic particles flowing from N and S will interact to repel one another, even though opposite polnormally attract one another in a bead on position.

< 3 > — FIGURE 13-HTOP VIEW

PERIPHERY ATTRACTION

PERIPHERY ATTRACTION -$>-£,V ~

-©--- QUALITATIVE DEPICTISimilarly, with two like poles (see Figure 13-H2) brougtogether (N to N or S to S) — while they repel eachother when placed head on, the models appeared to dicate that the magnets would attract each other whe

This simple experim ent to test thevalidity of an explana tion for a previousunobserved (or if observed, thenunexplained) magnetic phenomenon is powerful corroboration for the rigbtneof Mr. Newman's theories.

the ends are placed slightly side to side (alongside onanother and ov erlapping in the same plane.) For thiswriter, the real test was whether actual magnets behaved in this manner. In testing such magnets, I founthat such side attraction (with N to N) and side repuls(with N to S) was observed exactly as the mechanicaldescriptions of Mr. Newman would predict and indicThis simple experiment to test the validity of an expltion for a previously unobserved (or if observed, theunexplained) magnetic phenomena is a powerful corroboration for the Tightness of Mr. Newman's theorie


21/62

Technica l ly speaking, l ike a water wheel harness ing

to

ms of the m agn et. A ma gnetic field is

the motion of the gyroscopic par t ic les about

theopic par t ic le . As the a toms be com e a l igned within

One may wonder tha t , i f the magnets a re depic ted of

100% convers ion eff ic iency ( there be ing no radia t ion,perate at less than 1 % eff ic iency) , and becau se there each a tom,housands of years before one would de tec t any s ignif i

I t should be no ted tha t Mr . Newman has worked onthese ideas for 19 years. Mr. Ne wm an sub m itted histheoretical discussion and proofs to the patent officeeveral years before he cons t ruc ted the ac tua l work ingprototype of his energy machine . Mr. Newman was totally convinced of the Tightness of his theories and didnot need an ope ra t ing machine to prove such Tightnessto himself. From his perspec t ive , such a machine wasneeded as proof to everyone e lse .I t i s Mr. Newman's pos i t ion tha t f rom his var ioustheor ies (of which this discuss ion about the [magnet ic -field-creating] gyroscopic particles is only a single aspec tof his theor ies) one should be able to unders tand tha t i twould be poss ible to construc t an energy machine tha twas capable of harness ing such (gyroscopic) energy i fone could visua l ize the proper conf igura t ion of thematerials necessary to effect such harnessing. Such configuration is the technical aspect of the Patent itself —technica l ly independent of , but theore t ica l ly dependentupon, unders tanding the na ture of the gyroscopic par t i c les and how they interac t with one another , espec ia l lys ince a l l a toms in the universe a re composed of suchparticles.Although this would be a separa te (but physica l ly-

related) theoretical discussion, Mr. Newman has indicate d that gravitation is the obs erv ed effect of the

interac t ion of unobserved e lec tromagnet ic f ie lds (coposed of gyroscopic par t ic les) surrounding bodies inspace . [Mr. Newman has theore t ica l concepts appropate to this subject.]As the drawings a lso indica te , pos i t ive and negat ive lec tr ica l charges a re de termined by the gyroscopic sof individual particles, and such charges are repelleda t t rac ted to one another according to per iphery a t t ration (see PROOF A).Th e fundam enta l , gy rosco pic par t ic le is, therefore ,

unifying factor for the nuclear, electric , magnetic, angravitational fields.Evan R. Soule', Jr.New Orleans, Louisiana (1

(VOT E: To date, over thirty individuals have signeAffidavits attesting to the rightness of Mr. Newm aninvention. These individuals include electrical engineers, physicists, inventors, scientists, and explicitlMr. Milton E verett (biomass energy specialist with Mississippi D epartment of Energy), Dr. Roger Hast(principal physicist for Sperry-Univac in St. Paul, Mnesota), and Mr. Eike Mueller (West Germ an scientand European Space Agency mission coordinator the National Aeronautics and Space Adm inistratio

14


22/62


23/62

caused by the (copper) wire, but must be a result ofthe current itself. This same incorrect conclusion isstill rigidly taught to this day.The following facts will clearly prove that copper ishighly magnetic relative to the speed of a tomalignment/unalignment as well as the action/reactioneffect of the energy release (in the form of the gyroscopic panic les previous ly discussed) f rom the a tomscompris ing the copper wire

"The prior teachings indicate that copperis non-m agnetic and that the resulting field associated w ith current flowcopper is the result o f the current. Thoseteachings are totally wrong. Copper ismag netic It is so mag netic that itdeceives the observer."14C. Wha t the Prior Art teaches: Hyp othe t ica l ly, if on eimposes current into a (copper*) conductor coi l ofpure induc tance , the same cur ren t would be r e turnedas that which was initially placed into the (copper*)conducting coil. (See Figures 14-C1 and 14-C2.)

GRAPH POWER IN PURE INDUCTANCE

SCOPE

FIGURE 14-C2COPPER COIL

[*This process is in no way limited to copper. Actually, one can utilize an y suitable materials for conducting, e.g., super-conduct ing mater ia ls such as niobiumtin, etc.]

Physically speaking, this simply means that theenergy conta ined within the magnet ic f ie ld — w h e ngene ra ted b y pos i t ive (+ ) curr ent f low in one direct ion — is retu rn ed b y the collapsing m agn etic field anegative ( - ) curre nt flow wh en the curren t f lowreverses direc t ion.14D . The Prior Art also teaches Kirchhoffs Lawwhich states: the same amo un t of curren t placed ina sys tem (as a copper conductor) for a given- ins tant time has the same amount of current flowing fromthat sys tem (copper conductor) for the same given-instant of time. (See Figure 14-D.)

FIGURE 14-D

COPPER COIL

METERS SHOW SAME CURRENT OUT OFCOIL AS CURRENT INTO COIL IN TH E SAMEINSTANT OF TIME

E. Th e abov e FACTS of 14C and 14D totally contradict the prior teaching that the magnetic fieldgenera ted by th e current f lowing in a (copper) conductor is solely a result of the current itself and thacopper is non-magnet ic .Look at the facts and open your mindThe fac ts demonstra te the fol lowing: 14C abovesho ws th a t if one inputs a given am oun t of currentinto a cop per coil dur ing a given- ins tant of t ime thas descr ib ed in 14D abo ve , the same amo unt of curent (X) ou tpu ts f rom the cop per coi l dur ing the sains tant of t ime. In addi t ion, 14C above a lso shows if the current is then cut off and the coi l shor ted wmeters in the l ine , then the same amount of curren(X) will now come from the copper coil.Th e fac ts therefore dem onstra te : (X) curren t in a(X) current out plus (X) cu rren t out again w he n th(X) cu rren t inpu t is sto pp ed . The se facts are there fequiva lent to 1 (X) amo unt of current into the coi(copper) and 2 (X) am ou nt of curre nt out of the (cper) coil.

QUESTION: From where did the extra (X) amount current coming from the copper coil emana te?ANSWER: By analog y, the Prior Tea chin gs indicate tcurren t is equiva lent to the volum e of water and tha


24/62

is equiva lent to the pre s sure of water . Therefore , the e s sence of this analogy

to the facts d iscuss ed ab ov e. (See Figures 14-E1

FIGURE 14-E1

BATTERIES•COPPER COIL

ONE GALLON OF CURRENT PUTINTO COPPER COIL AND TWOGALLONS OF CURRENT COMEOUT OF COPPER COIL

FIGURE 14-E2

WATER PIPE

ONE GALLON OF WATER INTO PIPINGSYSTEM WILL AT MAXIMUM ONLYPRODUCE ONE GALLON OF WATEROUT OF SYSTEM(There are those who will blindly state that the magnetic field produced Isequivalent to pressure Increase as related to hydraulics. Such a statement Istotally wrong even by the known laws of hydraulics, because as one increasesthe volume flow per s econd one also increases the velocity of that entity andthereby Its pressure decreases.)

The fac ts c lear ly demonstra te tha t in F igure 14-E1, of cur r en t c am e f rom the copper coil itself

not f rom th e Initial o n e " g a l l o n " of put in to the cop per coi l . (This is an ana logy The mass or v o l u m e of the e lec tr ic current input

be seen or we ighed because it is c o m of gyro scopic par t ic les and is the mechan ica l

of E = M C2.)i*F . Th e Pr ior Teachings dis tor t the abo ve facts andwould indica te tha t the ana logy of o n e " g a l l o n " ofcur ren t has no pressure w he n com ing f rom the coil inFigure 14-E1, and tha t one "ga l lon" of cur ren t has apressure which is thereb y equiva lent to one "ga l lon"of current with the input pressu re . Fur therm ore , su chteachings would indicate tha t because of the resistance within the coil an d oth er losses, no t even thelatter pressure will o c c u r in reality.

Even I was mislead by these teachings for manyyears, and I finally came to the realization that co pp erwas highly magnet ic by a com ple te ly dif ferent mean sthan out l ined above . These means inc luded: (1) mygene ra l comprehens ion which or ig ina ted wi th my recogni t ion tha t the basic building block of all mattermatte r was th e gyroscopic particle, an d (2) a test Iconduc ted us ing a single piece of copp e r w i re 800feet long, which was doubled-back 400 feet to the

s ta r t ing point and h o o k e d to a me te r and dry cell battery. (See Figures 14-F1 an d 14-F2.)

FIGURE 14-F1400 ft.c V-ioit400 ft. BATTERY

FIGURE 14-F2METER

40 0 ft.400 ft. £ >

BATTERY

The te s t shown in Figure 14-F1 has the parallel po st ions of the wire 10 feet apart, wi th no "UnobviousF o r c e " b e t w e e n the para lle l po r t ions of the wire . Thtes t shown in Figure 14-F2 has the para lle l po r t ion s othe wire extremely c lose , with an " U n o b v i o u s F o r c eb e t w e e n the parallel p arts of the single wire.The resul ts of these two te s ts demo ns t ra ted thesame current input for bo th tes ts . Pr ior to theseresults I had recognized tha t th e w o r d s " W o r k , "" F o r c e , " an d " P o w e r " are implici t engin eer ings ta tements and do not repr esen t precise , scientificte rms based upon observa t ional rea l i ty. I conceptua l l

a l te red such macroscopic , engineer ing s ta tements to" O b v i o u s w o r k , " " O b v i o u s F o r c e , " and " O b v i o u sP o w e r . " I wou ld mic roscopica lly de sc r ibe wha t o c curs inte rna l ly, within matte r as " U n o b v i o u s W o r k , "" U n o b v i o u s F o r c e , " and "U n o b v i o u s P o w e r . " (I wilexpla in these concepts la te r in this Book.) Suchsemantic clarification enabled me to k n o w — u p o ncomple t ing the abov e tes ts in Figures 14-F1 and 14-F— tha t coppe r is extrem ely mag net ic .14G. Returning to the above tes t of Figure 14-E1 and14-E2: by my teaching, the facts clearly sho w that inthe above ana logy, one ga l lon of cur ren t "m a t te r "(consisting of gyroscop ic par t ic les) was released fromthe a toms of the copp er coi l This extra one ga l lon ocurrent (gyroscopic par t ic les) comes f rom the c o m p onent par ts of the a toms comp r i s ing the cop per coi land simply utilizes Einstein's Equation of E = M C2 .(I must stress that this is an ana logy only . The volumor mass of matte r via the gyro scopic par t ic lesrepresents the mechanic s of E = M C2 and such particles cannot be seen or we ighed by convent iona lmeans . Their exis tence can be inferred, how ever ,based on the ir mechanica l behav ior com bin ed withknown, observa t ional fac ts . )

r


25/62

How can thisextra one gallon of current exist?WER: The curren t inpu t (gyrosco pic particles) simply relative to the atom s com prising the cop — atoms which align and unalign extremely fast a toms of conven t ional , magnet ic

rrent is turn ed off, the collapsing (gyrosco pices of the) m agnetic field within the coil results in the

in th e gyroscopic particles striking other atoms ihe copper coil at some degree of a right angle and at right angles to that force. This gyroscop ic mo-

Such mechan ical action results inthe gyroscopic particles striking otherwithin the copper coil at some degreea right angle and moving at right anglesto that force."

E = M C2, there will be no observable change inI sho uld add that there is an impo rtant con ceptu al." To state that a given in ven tion is 8.2 efficient, i.e., itduc es ov er e ight times as mu ch energy as i t consume s,

i.e., it comp le te ly conver ts the gyroscop ic par involves production efficien conversion efficiency.

5- No w to discuss the practical usage for this ne w E = MC- and com

, condu c tor s , and coppe r . By unde rs tand ing the ca n bui ld

cond uc t ing co i l which wi l l p ro duc e mo re such as ba t te ry, genera tor , e tc .

I wish to thank Dr. Roger Hastings, Senior Physicist

fearful o rFor "mind-opening purposes" ( to use th e current

A. Take 40-gauge cop per w ire wh ich has a res is tanof 1,049 O hm s for 1000 feet with a total weig ht (ofa toms composed of gyroscopic par t ic les) of a mere.02993 lbs., turning same into a coil with a 10-foot ite r ior diameter and 8.32 fee t in he ight . One wouldtherefore have approximate ly a mere 31.8 turns ofcoppe r w i re ( coppe r a toms , i.e., gyroscopic par t ic le(See Figure 15-A.)

FIGURE 15-A

C O IL \ ^ A fWEAK MAGNETIC FIELDIf 100 volts is connected to coil 15-A, then a currf low of approximate ly 95MA would occur with totapower input of 9.5 wat ts and a resul t ing weak, magnetic field of .012 Gauss or a mere .000014 Joules oenergy stored in this weak, magnetic field.An ins ignif icant current f low would now occur i fthe current input was s topped and coi l 15-A wasshor ted-out to col lapse a weak magnet ic f ie ld and pvide an inductance of only .003 Henries .

15B . Now , con du ct ano ther tes t with 5-gauge cop pewire which has a resistance of .3133 Ohms for 1000feet. However, to equal the same resistance as in 15above , one must now use 3,348,000 fee t of 5-gaugwire with a mass ive , tota l weight (of a toms compoof gyroscopic par t ic les moving and t rave l ing a t thespeed of light, i.e., the mechanica l essence ofEins te in 's Equat ion E = M C2) of 335,469.6 lbs . or16.77 tons. Such wire is turned into a coil with a10-foot interior diameter and 8.32-foot height. Thiss t ruc ture would have approxima te ly a phenomena l90,000 turns of 5-gauge (copper a toms) . I f 100 vol twe re now connec ted to co i l 15-B (see draw ingbelow ), then a curren t f low of appro xim ate ly 95MAcou ld occu r with a tota l po we r input of 9.5 wat ts aa resul t ing, phenomenal ly la rger magnet ic f ie ld of Gauss, or 1,905 times larger for coil 15-B than for c15-A, and 116 Jou les of energy s tored in the mag nef ie ld of Figure 15-B be low. This represents a phenoenal 8 million times more en ergy tha n in the40-gauge coil of 15-A a bove.


26/62

A pheno me nally larger current f low wo uld no w oc th e current input was s topped and coil 15-B was as a result of the collapsing, much greater 15-B. Such generate an inductance of 25,700 8 million times the imluc- of the 40-gauge coil in Figure 15-A above.Clearly, these facts — com bined wi th the above

1 th rough 14 — prov e beyo nd any doubt that is still taught to

this day): "that the magnetic field came only from thcurrent and not the conductor" to be to ta l ly fa lse .[Although his con clu sion is inco rrect, I rema in grateto Hans Christian Oersted for being the first to noticand at tempt to explain an observed connection between an electric current and a magnetic field.)W hen co upled with FACTS 1 throu gh 14, tes ts 15and 15-B clearly prov e that the phe nom ena l differenin strength for the resulting magnetic fields (implyingreat differences in stored energy) and additional curent f low w hen th e input current was s top ped ( indu

19


27/62

tance), had to come from the gyro scopic par t ic lescompr i s ing the com pon ent pa r t s of the a toms withinthe copper coil.The current flow input was the same in both tests,bu t the number of atoms (lbs. of copper) varied considerably from test 15-A to test 15-B correlatingprecisely w i th the phe no me nal dif fe rence in thes trength of magnet ic f ie lds produced, the e x t r e m e difference in the s tor ed en ergy (gyroscop ic par t ic les) ,an d the great difference (ind uctanc e) in the add i t iona lcurrent flow produced w h e n the input current wass t o p p e d In test 15-A and test 15-B. These phenomenaldifferences represent the mechanical essence ofE = M C2: gyroscopic particles.All of the above FACTS 1 t h r o u g h 15 scientificallyestablish the pos i t ion tha t the mathematica l formulase m p l o y e d in the calculation of the ene rgy wi th in amagnetic field (intended to represent the potent ia lenergy or s tored ene rgy of Joules in a magnetic field)are totally incorrect. The FACTS above clearly indicatethat the magnetic field consists of g)>roscopic-type particles w h i c h are the mechanical essence of E = M C2 andrepresent an orderly flow of kinetic energy.

I will go further and s ta te tha t "pot ent ia l" energy,as such, does not exist All energy is kinetic in na ture ,since the gyro scop ic par t ic les cont inue , un der all condi t ions , to m o v e and spin at the speed of light in accordance wi th E = M C2 .The above FACTS prove beyond ques t ion tha t theproper mathematica l equat ion (concerning the"k ine t i c " ene rgy which makes up a magnetic field)mus t be relative to E = M C2 . A pro per mathem atica lequa t ion would recognize that the "UnobviousForce'' produced represen ts the Joules of the ' 'Unobvious Pow er" activated at that instant-in-time and as

so used would diminish the mass of the source of the

Maxwell explicitly stated his debt to Faraday:"The methods are generally those suggested by theprocesses of reasoning which are found in the researches of Faraday, and which, though they havebeen interpreted mathem atically by Prof. Thomsonand others, are very generally supposed to be on anindefinite and unmathematical character, whencompared with those employed by the professedmathematicians. By the method which I adopt, I hoto render it evident that I am not attempting toestablish any physical theory of a science in which 1have hardly made a single experiment, and that thelimit of my design is to shew how, by a strict application of the ideas and methods of Faraday, theconnexion of the very different orders of phenom enwhich he has discovered may be clearly placed befothe mathematical mind. *ISC . In 1979, I filed a pa ten t for this Pioneer ing Invent ion of wh ich severa l em bo dim ents have been taughand disclosed since that t ime. The use of a conduc t icoil is on e of t h o s e em b o d i m e n t s and the original paent and cont in uing pa tent appl ica t ions w ere f iledbefore any phys ica l p ro to types ba sed on the Theorywere bui l t . The physica l prototy pes w ere thereafte rbuilt for the benefit of o the r s , not for myself, s ince knew r such pro to types would ope ra te as I had predied. Scientifically, one should f ind per t inen t the facttha t when the se pro to types we re cons t ruc ted , theyp e r f o r m e d exactly as I had conceptua l ly pred ic ted ithe pa tent appl ica t ions for this Pioneer ing Invent ion

See be low pic ture 15-C1 featuring one of these eaprototypes ut i l iz ing 5-gauge , insula ted copper wirewi th a tota l weight of approxima te ly 4 ,200 lbs. ofc o p p e r a t o m s (or o v e r two tons) , 300 lbs. of N o. 30

... the mag netic field consists of gyroscopic-type particles wh ich are themechanical essence ofE = MC2 and represent an orderly flow of kinetic energy.magnetic field via a 100% ut i l iza t ion {conversion effic iency) of Eins te in 's Equat ion E = M C2 , s ince themagnetic field consists of kine t ic energy having agyroscopic ac t ion which represents the mechanica lessence of E = M C2 .

I leave the task of de termining the na ture of suchequat ions to a thinking, questio ning mathem aticalmind , as I do not have the mathem atical exp ertise. Itshould be noted, ho wever , tha t t he mechanica l com prehens ion of a natura l pheno men on has often historically preceded a mathematical model. James ClerkMaxwell acknowledged the impor tance of MichaelFaraday's mechanical and experim ental abilit ies.Maxwell also recognized that such mechanical aptitudeconst i tuted a major intellectual input to his latermathematical theories. In his paper 'On Faraday's Linesof Force, ' read before the Cam bridge PhilosophicalSociety on December 10, 1855 and February 11 , 1856,

Gauge copper wire (a toms) wrapped o v e r the outs idof the 5-gauge wire (atoms), and a pe rmanen t magneconta in ing approxima te ly 600 lbs. of a toms (orslightly less that 'A of a ton) . [I am deliberately referring to the w i re as " a t o m s " an d descr ibing the magas 600 lbs. of " a t o m s " in o r d e r to accus tom thereader to a mechanical pe r spec t ive conce rn ing thenature of the ac t ion of the gyro scop ic par t ic les conta ined wi th in all a toms.]

The mass ive , permanent magnet had an approxi mate 20- inch diameter and was slightly less than 4 flong. The la rge, condu ct ing co pp er coi l had an approxima te 1 .D of 4 feet, was approxima te ly 3 feet iheight , and was w r a p p e d u p o n a large fiberglass tubThe total weight of the sys tem was approx ima te ly5,000 lbs.*L. Pearce W illiams, Michael Faraday. Chapman and Hall, Ltd.London, 1965, pages 510-511.

20THE ENERGY MACHINE OF JOSEPH NEWMAN


28/62

15-Ct (SIDE VIEW) *W 010 BY %WTT A N D ER S ON

15-C1 (TOP VIEW) *MOTO «Y MATT AMOf RSONThe photographs shown in ISCl simply representrimitive, handmade prototype made (in the bat kc Technical Process u • W.(HH) times more imfuntattt than thrprimitu e,

pmtt>typc\With only I '/? watts input, the back power (emfj generateaspark at the commutator heat magnitude that the back power would. In Short period Of time, explode and destroy a ceramic 5-watt resistor placed on the com the point of current reversal l)r Roger hack emf to be in excess of

The rotating, handmade, 600 lh. (of atoms), 4-foot RPM At 2 00 RPM it wa s cal hy others that the centrifugal force would be lbs. of force attempting to pull the magnet

Everyone who initially viewed the massive unit i15-CI abo ve was then asked the question: Based oyour expertise, how much power would be necessato simply operate this device m echanically? Answefrom 200 to 1000 watts. Other skilled individuals -upon learning that the unit had only copper in the co— stated that in their expert opinion, the unit wouldbe highly inefficient Since il contained no iron core-However, the facts pertaining to the unit's operatioin IS-C1 do clearly prove that the unit could operateo n test than I J4 WOttS an d that it wets phenomenallefficient, i.e., far In excess of 100% production effic iency relative to the power out of the system compared to the external power into the system, andexactly 10096 conversion efficiency relative to theconversion of tin- mass (g \ roscopic particles) of copel atoms to electrical and rotational energy outputI must Mro-s that this process is not perpetual mlion Anyon e w ho follows my teachings is simply

7lM energy out of the total system isequivalent to the small amou nt of electrenergy input (acting as a pure catalyst)

the extant magn etic energy (in the form gyroscopic fyarticles) within the system.

converting (on a 100% conversion efficiency basis)mass into energy via a 100% (or more) production ficiency p r o c e s s . Therefore, th e energy out of the tsystem is equivalent to the small amount of electricenergy input (acting as a pure catalyst) plus the extaut magnetic energy (in the form of gyroscopicftarticles) within the system Due to this lattei mmhi nation 0/energies, it may he said that the externenergy output is greater than the external energy Inp

I will again turn to Dr. Roger Hastings (SeniorPhysicist with Sjx-rry I nivat i wh o has conductedmore tests on different occasions upon my workinprototypes than anyone else. I reemphasize the poithat Dr. Hastings is an exceptional scientist who hicourage and the true scientific attitude. As a result, came forth in my behalf when many others werefrightened or closemindedThe verification of the operation of the unit in

15-CI above, as well as other prototypes, and thequalitative scientific ability and fortitude ol Dr.Hastings arc clearly demonsiraicd via the KM described in Chapter Five Such a healthy, scientific atitude is ev en more ex em plified by the fact that Dr.1lasting . w e nt o n reco rd J% having uo cc l»,ivt the .ittitude that, before he traveled to Lucedale to meetme, to l isten to my concepts, and to conduct tests, w as of the belief that he would be confronting a•crack-pot inven tor. Fortunately, Dr. Hastings' skticism was tempered with genuine curiosity. 1 havediscovered that without such curiosity, skepticismwill rapidly decay into cynicism.Or Roger Hasting.-, statem ents and tests follow.


29/62

W I N G E XT EN S IV E T E S T I N G O N 5,000 AND 900 LB. UN ITS

DECLARATION

The Honorable Commissionerof Patents and TrademarksWashington, D. C. 20231Gentlemen:

This letter represents a disclosure of Investigations andexperimentation which I have performed on Mr. Joseph Newman'senergy generating machine (patent pending). The fact is thatevery experiment which I have performed shows that the energyoutput of the device is indeed larger than the energy Input. Someexaaples are:

1.) The electrical energy output is measured at more thanfour times the electrical energy inout. These results may beverified by examining the oscillograph records taken by Dr. F. NeffWeber in December, 1961.

2.) Acting as a motor Mr. Newman's device performed mechanicalwork In excess of ten times the electrical energy input.

3.) Mr. Newman's device delivers over ten times the torque ofa commercial D.C. permanent magnet motor rated at 80? efficiency.However* during this test Mr. Newman's device is consuming only afraction of the input power of the commercial motor.

These results must be taken seriously. Mr. Newman has madethe. observation that huge magnetic fields may be generated withminimal power input in a large coil wound with large diameter wire.This coil creates a very large torque on a suitably large permanentmagnet. In operation, the batteries powering the coil consume littlepower and discharge at a very slow rate. Yet the motor deliversconsiderable mechanical and/or electrically generated power.


30/62


31/62

DECLARATIONApril 26, 1982

A PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OP THE NEWMAN MOTOR

This document compiles and analyzes the results of severalexperiments performed on the Newman Motor in 1981 and 82. Theresults of the experimental work show that this motor operateswith energy output far in excess of energy input. This work isintended to characterize the motor, and to organize the experimental results. It is hoped that the document will serve as aguide In the development of the mathematical theory which explainsthe Newman Motor.I. Mechanical Energy Output

A.) Te3t against a d.c. Permanent Magnet Motor/Rated 80%Efficient.

Date: 2-20-82In this experiment eight fresh 1.5 Volt alkaline batteries wereconnected to an 80? rated efficient d.c. motor. The motor turnedan oil pump at about 1 Hz. The motor ran for 6 minutes, and thefinal battery voltage was about 60J8 of the starting voltage.

Alkaline batteries were used because battery performancecurves were available from the manufacturer. One such chart isplotted in Fig. 1. The performance of the d.c. motor is verifiedby the chart, which predicts that the batteries, when initiallydrained at 2 amps, will last 6 min. The measured motor drain underload was near 2 amps.

The above results allow us to estimate the power consumed bythe oil pump. We find:

initial pump output power « 0 8Initial battery Input powerpump output • 0.8 x 2 amps x 12 volts - 19 Watts

The same pump was connected to the Newman Motor (with a 90/f permanentmagnet rotor) so that the pump again ran at near 1 Hz. Therefore,the pump was consuming the same power in this experiment. Eight


32/62


33/62

were drained to about 60t of their starting voltage after seven(7) hours Although the input current to the Newman Motor followsa complicated waveform, we may estimate the initial average inputcurrent from the performance curve (fig. 1 ) . Using 0.2 amps at12 volts we find:

Initial Newman Motor Input • 2.k WattsSince the output is consuming 19 Watts we have:

Newman Motor Efficiency - j-9 x 100* • 800%At this point we note that the intrinsic efficiency of the

Newman Motor could be greatly increased. As designed now the motorhas a tremendous leakage flux, and extreme mechanical losses. Anefficiently designed Newman Motor would certainly have three timesthe efficiency quoted above, and perhaps ten times (8000V.).

B.) Static Torque Test Date: 2-20-82The output shafts of the d.c. motor and Newman Motor were connectedin turn to a scale via a pulley and belt. The d.c. motor pulleda maximum of 1.5 lbs., while the Newman motor pulled 13 lbs. Atmaximum load the d.c. motor consumed about 2k Watts while theNewman Motor consumed only 2.M Watts.

Static Torque Ratio Newman motor . 13 » 8.7d.c. motor 1.5

g input energy ratio Newman Power . 0.1d.c. motor power

If we define a motor performance parameter under static loads bythe ratio of maximum torque output to the input energy drain, wefind that this number is 87 times larger for the Newman motor thanfor the d.c. permanent magnet motor

C.) Battery Lifetime Tests March/April, 1982It has become apparent that the batteries powering the Newman


34/62

rotor is spun up to 6 Hz. in 21 sec. when the batteries areconnected to the motor. The voltage drops from 125 V. to 70 V.when the batteries are connected, and remains at 70 V. when therotor runs at speed. The minimum power supplied by the batteriesis therefore equal to the power required to spin up the rotor.This is:

p « 1 I W 2 /t

where t « time to spin up rotor • 21 sec.W • angular speed • 2 x 7f x 6 Hz.I - M R2 + L2)IT 12

M • rotor mass - 11 kg.R » rotor radius • .08m.L • rotor length - .31 m.

This yields a minimum energy required to keep the rotor spinningat 6 Hz. of 13 Watts. Therefore the batteries must be supplyingat least 13/70 • 190 m amps. As a separate estimate it was foundthat a constant drain of 300 m amps, through a resistor drops thebattery voltage from 125 V to 70 V. Consulting the battery chartswe find that a fresh battery with a starting drain of 150 m amps.100 m amps, when V • 2/3 starting voltage) will drop from 2/3 to

1/2 of its starting voltage in a few hours. If the batteries beganat 2/3 of their fresh voltage under a drain of 250 m amps, theywould be very dead in two hours.

The Newman motor has been run for between one and four hoursper day for a total of ten hours. The batteries began at 2/3 oftheir fresh voltage, and after the ten hours the voltage had not


35/62

April 20, 1982. On this date the old batteries have worn downto a point at which they will not even run a 1 1/2 V. small toy motor.Yet when they are connected to the Newman motor, the 90 lb. rotor isspun up to ** -5 Hz. in about 20 secondsII. Electrical Energy Output

The Newman motor generates electrical energy by induction. Therelevant experiments have been documented elsewhere, and indicatean efficiency of about Aoot in the generation of electrical power.Experiments have since been run in which mechanical energy wasmeasured via measurement of the frequency at which the motor runswhile delivering a measured torque. Electrical energy was simultaneously generated, and the sum of electrical and mechanical energywas roughly twice the energy obtained when only electrical energywa3 generated. In this experiment an accurate measure of the inputpower was not made. Instead, batteries were used and the timerequired to drain the batteries to a given voltage was measured. Itwas hoped that the battery charts could be used to estimate theinput power. The result was too close to 100? efficiency to relyupon the accuracy of the charts. It should be noted that the measureoutput energy did not include losses in the belt used to transmittorque. In addition, the whole measurement apparatus was set intomotion by the magnetic force during rotation.III. Static Measurements

Mr. Newman has made measurements of the static torque generatedby his 600 magnet at various voltages. These results agree withtheoretical predictions based upon measurements of the magneticmoment of the magnet. The predicted torque is:

7* - ~M x ~H ,and the maximum torque is MH. The static field generated by thecoil is:


36/62

The magnetic field of the 600# magnet was measured at variousdistances from the magnet using a Hall effect transducer (factorycalibrated). These results were compared with the expression forthe dipole field to yield a magnetic moment of M « 10 ' X- ft' 0r100 gauss ft3. Therefore the maximum torque is predicted to be:

T = MH •» 2.6 x 10" 3 (Si) ft. lbs.,L

T in amps,L in meters.

The length of the motor coil is .69 m. and the number of turnsis 2,630. Therefore

Y * 9.9 I ft. lbs. (I in a m p s .Mr. Newman's measurements of torque and current are listed below:

Voltap I Y Y1612182430

.6.98.751.31.1

17.3/433/429.3/438/447/4

7.218.429.777.318.39average 8.2

The value 8.2 for Y /l compares well with the predicted value of9.9 considering inaccuracies in measureing devices.

It has often been noted by Mr. Newman that for a fixed powerinput to a coil, the torque increases with the moment of the magnet.If the magnet is made infinitely magnetic the torque becomes infiniteven if the power to the coil is very small.IV. Dynamic Properties

A.) InductanceTo begin with, the inductance of the 600# magnet motor coll

may be predicted and taken from measurement. The predicted value is

L - y ^ N2 A ,


37/62

In operation the motor inputs a square wave voltage for ation of the roughly 0.5 Hz. cycle. Since the coil resistance

R., L/R should be much larger than one period, and we predictcurrent rise of:

I - I (1-e -t/L/R) * V tR Lrom an oscillograph photo with no load on the system, the coilcurrent rises 0.5 amps in 0.1 sec. when 200 volts are switched acrossthe coil. Thus:

L - 200 (0.1) - M0 Henries— o ~ —

The magnet is turning during this measurement so the approximateagreement between theory and measurement is reasonable.

B.) Motor FrequencyUnder no load and assuming zero friction, the maximum theoretical

possible frequency of the motor is determined by the condition thatthe induced voltage is equal to -) the Input voltage. The Inducedvoltage is:

Vind *• -w Bmagnet if Ho 2 N ,Bmag • magnetic induction of rotating magnetRo • coll radiusw • 2 f x frequency

With Vind = - V we find:f » V 1

ZTT 1T"Ro2~~rr-Bmag"Now Bmag « 2 T M »


38/62

With m - .01 W (ft) 3 , Ro » .76 m N - 2630,m2ft » T ( 1 ' ) 2 x 4» - 12.56 (ft)3 we find:

V >/t> - .0067 V (Hz)tfP M N Ro2

f » .402 V (rpm)At 200 Volts we find the maximum frequency, if the motor had a lOOitintrinsic efficiency (no losses), is :

f • 80.1* rpm, about double the 600 observed motor frequencyunder no load.

C.) Energy Input (Theoretical Estimate)Assuming that:

1.) The voltage input and induced emf are l80°out of phase.

2.) The voltage input varies sinusoidally.We have:

(V - Vind) e i w t « L dl + IRarI » V - Vind cos(wt - Q)

R )l + (wL)2R

where t an(Q) • wL/RThe average power consumed by the coil is then:

P - 1 V (V - Vind), c o s Q)RV 1 + (wL)*

P • 1 V (V - Vind) * V R (V - Vind)2 2


39/62

This number agrees approximately with Mr. Newman's measurementsof input power, in an experiment in which output was measuredat about 5 Watts. The numbers used in the above calculation areapproximate so the result represents an estimate. The expressionfor the input power along with the expression for Vind allow aprediction of how input power varies with motor frequency and voltagThe plot is shown in Fig. 2, and the prediction is given below:Predicted Power Input = H50 ( V ) 2 (1 - 200 f )

*** ~ ~ ^ Watts(1 + [_f_]2 )3.1

V *> input voltage (volts)f • motor frequency (rpm)

This result was obtained by requiring the derived formula to matchthe experimental result that input power at 200 volts and 35.7 rpm.is 1.8 Watts.

V. Predicted Output PowerThe output power is found by averaging the product of torque

on the magnet and frequency over one cycle. The torque is given by:~ 7^ » T ^ x ~H~* ,

and IT • MH cos (wt) • MNI cos (wt) ,L

Where the fact that maximum torque occurs In phase with maximuminput voltage has been used. The output power is therefore:

P ( t ) - MN (V. - Vind) W c os ( w t ) c os (wt-Q) ,L R


40/62


41/62

The output power goes to zero at the maximum frequency (V • Vind),and also at zero frequency.VI. Predicted Efficiency

Dividing the expressions for output and input power yields:Predicted efficiency « MN W x 100*,

L VWhere W cannot exceed its maximum value. Using MN/L « 9.9 ft. lbs.1 amp • 13 J./amp yields the following expression for the predictedefficiency of the 600 pound Newman motor:

Predicted efficiency • l.k f x 100?, f in r.p.m.V V in voltB

Operating under no load, the above formula predicts a Newman motorefficiency of 2k% (35 rpm at 200 volts). The theoretical maximummotor efficiency is obtained by using the maximum frequency of 80rpm at 200 V., yielding a 5&% upper limit in the case that the motorhas zero frictional losses. Working back through the equations itcan be seen that the maximum predicted efficiency is given purelyin terms of geometrical factors (ratio of magnet volume to coil volumeand cannot exceed lOOt,

It is clear that measured efficiencies for the Newman motor arefar in excess of predicted efficiencies. The predicted input poweris in agreement with measured input.

The measured output power exceeds the predicted output. Forexample, at 1.8 Watts input and 2^% efficiency we expect 0.4 Wattsoutput from the Newman motor. In one experiment the motor generated5 Watts of output power with 1.8 Watts input drain. The discrepanciesare far too large to be explained by experimental errors.VII. Unusual (Non Conventional) Behavior

As seen above, a number of properties of the Newman motorfollow conventional theory. In specific, the input power is as


42/62

when the voltage Is applied. My opinion is that an excess chargeis left in the coil when the input voltage is cut off. At this pointa spark appears and a huge induced e.m.f. Is created in the coil.This e.m.f. should disappear quickly (showing up as a spike). Howeverthe high voltage remains, having the period of the moving magnet.This indicates that the magnet is "pushing" an excess charge aroundin the coil, and this appears as excess current when contact isre-established with the battery.

There is also the issue of the "anomalous" current which appearsduring the spark. It is unclear from the photos whether this currentappears in the coil, but it has the proper sign and magnitude todrive the magnet.VIII. Future Theoretical Research

The upcoming challenge for this writer is to explain the Newmanmotor output mathematically. The purpose of the above documentation,for me, is to isolate the origin of the excess energy. At that pointit is likely that application of a unified theory of charge, matter,and energy, e.g. Mr. Newman's theory, will be required to mathematicaldescribe the results. This mathematical explanation will also have toexplain other various embodiments of the Newman Invention, which willobviously result from the Newman Disclosures.

Waiver: I am acting on my own,and am in no way representingSperry Univac Corporation.

HASTINGS /

DR. \ROGER HASTINGS 7~Principal PhysicistSPERRY UNIVAC CORPORATIONFormer Associate Professor of PhysiNorth Dakota State UniversityAuthor of Scientific Literature


43/62

R I P T I O N O F S M AL LER U N I TI T H A N A FF ID A V IT B Y D R . R O G E R H A S T I N G S

The following is a smaller unit (see photograph 1S-C2 below) composed of 30-gauge, insulated, copper wire weigately 145 lbs. (atoms) an d having a rotating magnet of 14 lbs. (atoms). This porta ble un it, with very little cu

1 Vi milliamps of curre nt (volume of gyroscopic particles) we nt into the copp er coil (of atoms), which Vi watt input for an energy outp ut in excess of 10 wa tts.15-C2:

i ; -.t m M I . ; H * , % . $ ; ? . % \ — - — • j r * ' m

PHOTO BY MATT ANDERSON

See below copy of a test conducted by Dr. Roger Hastings utilizing the 15-C2 unit.

}6THE ENERGY MACHINE OF JOSEPH NEWMAN


44/62

AFFIDAVITJune 17 , 1984

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

On June 16 and 17, 1984 I ran a series of tests onJoseph Newman's 14 5 lb. motor with 14 lb. rotary. These testsshow that power is generated by the motor which greatly exceedsthe battery input power. The results are summarized brieflybelow:

1. Demonstration of Large Current Spikes Produced by the MotorA. Oscilloscope Readings

The oscilloscope showed large (*1 Amp) staircase currentspikes of significant time duration, which were initiated whenthe commutator switched, and flowed both in the coil and batteryportions of the circuit. A picture of this spike taken on thecoil side of the commutator is attached. A block diagram of thecircuit is shown below.

&v$t&.rt* J/t$,Jt, c^t/

$rff&iri. f* rs' / f / **/**

To Stope To scope

101676677 the Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 1 of 5 Fully Searchable Text

Documents

Transcript of 101676677 the Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 1 of 5 Fully Searchable Text