10 SmartGrowth Implementation Committee -...

10 SmartGrowth Implementation Committee

Minutes of Meeting No. SGI 3/05 o f the SmartGrowth Implementation Committee held on 22 May 2013 in the Council Chamber, 91 Willow Street, Tauranga

commencing at 1pm

Present Independent Chairperson W Wasley

Bay of Plenty Regional Council Chair: J Cronin

Tauranga City Council Councillors: L Baldock, T Molloy

Western Bay of Plenty District Council Mayor: R Paterson Councillors: P Thomas, G Webber

Tauranga Whenua Representatives R Bennett, K Smith, M Tapsell

In Attendance SmartGrowth K Tremaine - Strategic Advisor Antoine Coffin - Tu Pukari Advisor Justine Brennan - Programme Manager

Bay of Plenty Regional Council M McLeod - Chief Executive F McTavish - General Manager, Strategy J Read - Group Managers Personal Assistant

Tauranga City Council Rick Curach - Councillor L Auton - Chief Executive C Jones - Deputy Chief Executive A Ralph - Manager: Environmental Policy

Western Bay of Plenty District Council Miriam Taris - Group Manager

New Zealand Transport Agency A Talbot - NZTA

Apologies Cr J Nees - Bay of Plenty Regional Council Cr P Thompson - Bay of Plenty Regional Council Mayor Crosby - Tauranga City Council

SG13/5.1

2 H SmartGrowth Implementation Committee - 22 May 2013

APOLOGIES

That it be Resolved

1. That apologies from Mayor Crosby, Cr Nees and Cr Thompson were received

Moved Cr Webber / Seconded Cr Molloy

CARRIED

SG13/5.2 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - SMARTGROWTH IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE (SG13/04- DATED 26 APRIL 2013)

SGI 3/5.3

The Committee considered the minutes of the SmartGrowth Implementation Committee (SGI3/04) dated 26 April 2013 as circulated with the agenda.

The following amendments were suggested

• Change the venue to read "Suites 3 & 4, ASB Arena, Truman Lane, Tauranga"

• Change the apologies - delete "Cr Mike Williams".

That it be Resolved

2. That the minutes o f the SmartGrowth Implementation Committee (SG13/04) dated 26 Apr i l be conf irmed as a true and correct record, subject to the above amendments.

Moved Cr Webber / Seconded K Smith

CARRIED

CHANGE TO ORDER OF BUSINESS

The Independent Chairperson requested a change to the order of business and a resolution on a presentation by Justine Brennan on Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Bill. The presentation will take place during the monthly report item ofthe Agenda.

That it be Resolved

That the SmartGrowth Implementation Committee:

3. Agrees to include a presentation by Justine Brennan on the Housing Accords and Special Areas Bil l.

Moved Cr Baldock / Seconded Cr Webber

CARRIED

3 12

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee - 22 May 2013

SG13/5.4

The Independent Chairperson confirmed with members there will be a short workshop at the conclusion of the formal meeting to discuss hearing and deliberation processes.

It was noted that Cr Rick Curach, Tauranga City Council is in attendance on behalf of Mayor Crosby.

PRESENTATION - ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN DURING CONSULTATION

Justine Brennan, SmartGrowth Programme Manager gave an overview to members on the activities undertaken during the SmartGrowth Strategy Consultation phase, Appendix A of the SmartGrowth Agenda 22 May 2013.

Key Points • Process update - key dates through to November • Communications and Engagement - Goals and Objectives • Communications and Engagement - Tactics (Committee members

noted Cr Bennett's recommendation to use direct engagement with iwi and hapu through a Combined Tangata Whenua Forum representative has been a great success)

• Communications and Engagement - Direct mail-out of Draft Strategy

Points raised by Members • Possible clash with the Tauranga City Council Projects and Monitoring

meeting 12 August 2013. • Committee members raised an issue around the November launch

date. The general preference for this to happen is before the election. It was understood that the timing is based on the Prime Minister's visit post-election.

• What is a Youth Forum classed as? For there to be a submission on it.

In Response to Questions • Tauranga City Council confirmed the SmartGrowth meeting will occur

after the Projects and Monitoring Council meeting on 12 August 2013. • The Independent Chairperson confirmed the timing ofthe SmartGrowth

Strategy launch in November has been discussed with CEAG. Some preferred to launch prior to the election and some preferred after. It was noted that this is still a work in progress

• Youth Forum - YMCA and Youth Forum. Submission would be relating to the lack of youth input throughout the SmartGrov\rth Strategy.

DECISIONS

SGI 3/5.5 SMARTGROWTH MONTHLY REPORT

The recommendations made on the recent activity in relation to the SmartGrowth update since 26 April 2013 meeting for SGIC consideration were.

That it be Resolved


4 1 3


4. Receives the report entit led SGIC Monthly Report for 22 May 2013.

5. Receives the report t i t led 'Public Information Evenings' attached as Appendix A

6. Receives the report t i t led 'SmartGrowth Partner Forum Submissions' attached as Appendix B

7. Notes the dates and intended process for hearing submissions on the draft Strategy

8. Receives the report t i t led 'SmartGrowth Partner Forum Submissions' attached as Appendix C

9. Agrees that amendments to lead agencies can be made through the SmartGrov\fth submission as detailed in Appendix C

10. Approves the Programme Manager and Independent Chair making minor amendments directly to the draft Strategy.

Moved Mayor Paterson / Seconded Cr Molloy

CARRIED

SGI 3/5.6 PRESENTATION - HOUSING ACCORDS AND SPECIAL HOUSING AREAS BILL

Justine Brennan, SmartGrowth Programme Manager gave a presentation on the Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Bill - Appendix A. Page 10

Kev Points Submissions due by 30 May 2013 Six main concepts Scheduled regions or districts Criteria for adding to schedule Housing Accords - agreement reached Housing Accords - agreement no reached Special Housing Areas Qualifying Developments More permissive resource consent powers Plans, proposed plans and plan variations

Points raised by Members Question around supply and affordability - Section 9 It's not a high threshold test to add to the schedule. The issue is affordable housing, can this be included. The taxation advantage of those investing in property. If the first home buyer had the same tax advantage, the housing would be a lot more affordable. Opportunity to improve the detail ofthe legislation. All costs to be taken into the consideration (Infrastructure)

5 1 4


• Plan change provisions, is it clear that it is a plan change to the District plan and the RPS. Clarity around fast tracking both.

• Combined Tangata Whenua Forum would like to be a part of this, working in collaboration with Councils.

• Mention of Papakainga • Committee members agreed it would be in SmartGrov^h's interest to

make the submission and believe Tauranga could become part of the schedule.

• Committee members would like to be heard on the submission and given the opportunity to present

In Response to Questions • These six areas of hierarchy and in an order. • In land and housing supply in regions. And agreed that it is unclear. • It was noted that a submission could go through with Tauranga on iL • 50% of the Region would meet the test • Improvement in clarity around infrastructure • Understanding that it based on the District Plan. Not so much the RPS • Papakainga is not mentioned in this legislation. It was agreed to include

Papakainga in the submission.

Justine Brennan will co-ordinate the submission with support from SmartGrowth staff, the focus ofthe submission will include

• A pragmatic response - better to be in the tent • Opportunity to improve the detail of the legislation (infrastructure costs,

integration with long-term land use planning) • Reference to previous Productivity Commission reports - difference

between land supply and affordability issues. • Take into account the comments received by members today.

This will be final and a copy will be sent to members for their information only on the 29'̂ May 2013.

That it be Resolved


11. Agrees on a SmartGrovirth submission to the HASH A Bill.

Moved Chair Cronin / Seconded Mayor Paterson

CARRIED

15


The Independent Chairman closed the formal meeting, and reminded members ofthe workshop that will follow.

The meeting concluded at 1.40pm

Confirmed as a true and correct record

W Wasley Independent Chairperson

31 July 2013

Date

IC

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee Hearings and Deliberations

Minutes o f Meet ing No. SG13/06 o f t h e Smar tGrow th Imp lementa t ion Commi t tee Hear ings held on 17, 18 ,19 and 21 June 2013 in the Counc i l Chamber

91 W i l l o w Street, Tauranga c o m m e n c i n g at 9am

Independent Chairperson:

Committee Members:

Bay of Plenty Regional Council

Tauranga City Council

Western Bay of Plenty District Council

Tauranga Whenua Representatives

W Wasley

J Cronin (Chairperson) Cr J Nees Cr P Thompson

Mayor S Crosby Cr L Baldock CrT Molloy

Mayor R Paterson Cr P Thomas Cr G Webber

R Bennett K Smith M Tapsell

SG13/6.1 SMARTGROWTH HEARINGS, DAY ONE 17 JUNE 2013

Apologies Chairman motioned that apologies from K Smith be accepted. Seconded Chairman J Cronin

Carried on the voices

Chairman Noted one late submission from Creative Tauranga and it did not cover any points that were not included in any other submissions. Sought motion to accept the late submission.

Thompson Motioned that the late submission be accepted. Paterson Seconded

Carried on the voices.

Chairman called the first submitter, Te Tumu Land Owners Group, Jeff Fletcher (Submitter No. 67).

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee 17

SGI 3/6.2 APPEARANCES

Mr Fletcher appeared for the Te Tumu Land Owners Group, he went through an overview of their submission and noted that there were a number of key points they wished to raise.

• Kaituna link is a key strategic connection to a future Urban Growth Area and its development should be staged.

• Papamoa East Interchange was an essential piece of infrastructure for the Eastern corridor.

• The Strategy should provide for future water based recreation and marinas as these facilities pertain to building the community.

• The section on Tsunami and Liquefaction includes quite a bit of uncertainty as in particular around the size of the earthquake events modelled in the Kermadec Trench, research and scientific knowledge is still evolving and the GNS modelling did not take into account evacuations from Te Tumu using future roads. In terms of liquefaction, experience in the South Island had shown developments in ground engineering could better manage liquefaction.

• A review of the settlement pattern should anticipate staging of key infrastructure, development viability and market demands.

• Assessment of infrastructure technologies and options for their delivery including the use of alternate technologies is needed.

The Committee sought clarification on a number of matters, these included the options for a road connection to this area and whether a roundabout was the likely connection method to the State highway. Other local examples of this nature were noted. Here recognition of a longer term perspective was sought that would bring the Kaituna link, discussed for some time, into the SmartGrovirth longer term visions. The matter of past decisions and related trigger points was raised (in relation to the Waikarei Plan Change) which is an example of how triggers previously set need to be considered in later changes.

9.23 am

2 The Carrus Corporation was represented by Mr Jim Lochhead (Submitter No. 16) who started by congratulating the forum for the progress and consultation ofthe SmartGrowth project. He raised the following key points;

• Population projections - it was unlikely that the population would grow the same as had been noted during a previous peak. There needs to be some questioning of where any growth would come from. He accepted the logic of demographic project feeding into a revision ofthe Strategy

• There is a need for flexibility and economic viability is a key factor in any growth logics.

• Entries on land titles relating to tsunami risk via PIM / LIM processes should be avoided until the respective report actions were completed.

An example used by the Committee to clarify points from the presentation was The Lakes Development, where a small bubble of activity and a bit of growth could be perceived as a trend. Mr Lochhead argued that 3'" generation UGAs would need to be subjected to feasibility work in the settlement pattern review noting Te Puke as an example. He suggested that Te Puna should also be considered in the settlement pattern review to avoid ad-hoc development as this area would be ideal for lifestyle developments to provide a balance to city intensification.

9.35 am


Andrew Dunstan (Submitter No. 56) appeared next expressing concerns about an ageing workforce and employment opportunities for unskilled / manual workers facing challenges such as high cost of housing. He went on to question the settlement pattern, noting that the Keenan Road area is well suited to development as many key services exist in area and it is located close to transport routes to Auckland and Hamilton. He also argued that the influence of PSA meant that this area is not as well favoured for planting kiwifruit as it once was.

9.48am

4

From the overhead aerial photo the Committee noted that one large area previously in kiwifruit was now cleared and regrafting had been tried unsuccessfully with other locations to the east being preferred. There was an absence of scientific evidence on this matter, but it was acknowledged that this may take years to become available.

The next submitter was Murray Davies (Submitter 24) who also congratulated the Forum on the SmartGrowth review document. He noted his support for the Keenan Road area, adding that excess capacity in the transport network existed at Pyes Pa South. Levies could be used to raise funds for the required work needed to prepare for growth in an area. Developing Pyes Pa South would reduce the pressures elsewhere and being only 10 mins to the city was ideal. The landform was suitable, services existed nearby and social facilities were present. He noted that although part of Keenan Road was narrow and winding, an upgrade sooner rather than later could resolve that for the area.

The Committee explored aspects of the submission such as the new school that was planned. The submitter was unsure of the details but suggested that it was not to be a Ministry of Education school, but an international one. In terms of Keenan Road it was noted that it had edge repairs not formal widening. The ridge area alongside the road was noted for its views. On the subject of access to the nearby State Highway there had been discussions with NZTA (undertaken by the previous submitter), who confirmed that depending on the final alignment, road access would be possible.

10.02am Chairman adjourned for the morning break. 10.21am Chairman resumed the session and called the next submitter.

5 The Kitchener Trust (Submitter No. 73), Zariba Holdings Ltd (Submitter No. 70) and Fairway Holdings Ltd (Submitter No 74) were represented by Aaron Collier, a planner for Aurecon. For the Kitchener Trust he had considered the adjacent Pyes Pa and Lakes Development and his submission covered a number ofthe key points.

• The Trusts land would provide around 450 lots and noted the preferred Tauriko Highway alignment.

• This development was within the existing urban limits yet was at odds with the Draft SmartGrowth maps which identify this area as 'Generation 4 under review'.

• Research undertaken for SmartGrowrth shows that options for wastewater do exist and therefore Pyes Pa area should not be categorised as 'under review'.

The Committee ascertained that the submitter had met with NZTA and that a roundabout at the location shown on the plans was the preferred option, it was also noted Mr Collier was referring to the same block of land detailed in the previous Dunstan submission.

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee 13 Mr Collier continued with the second submission he was presenting. Zariba Holdings Ltd. He explained this was land covered in the Wairakei area at Papamoa East and made the following key points;

• He felt that the settlement pattern review should reassess industrial land needs at Wairakei as a previous report noted 38ha, yet there was over lOOha provided in the latest plans.

• The timeframe for the settlement pattern review should be changed to urgent from short.

• The affordable housing needs in the area needed to meet basic practical considerations and sites that lie outside existing residential zones need consideration.

10.40am Mr Collier was awaiting his third client arriving and agreed to stand down pending their arrival.

Chairperson called Tauranga Youth Development Team (Submitter No. 15)

7 Becks Watts represented this submitter noting an offer of their services to help establish the SmartGrowrth Youth Forum. A detailed explanation of the background to the group was given as well as other initiatives of support in other forums that were being undertaken. Theirs was a voice for youth development across the region and noted that they had visited a number of community forums. Finally noting they were progressing towards becoming an Incorporated Society.

The Committee explored both the formation of the group and involvement with other agencies. Though a key person was leading the group at present succession planning was actively being progressed. There were 25 other agencies involved at this stage on the Youth Development Team. The Committee question whether the group encompassed ordinary youth as opposed to just leaders and prefects. It was noted that this was an area that was actively pursued, with foundation level values clearly identified by youth from local colleges, GetSmart, educational institutes and other representatives. Research on young people was noted as lacking compared to the general population and there was a tendency to not use the youth resource. It was explained that the DHB was to consider a 3 year focus on youth needs on both social and health needs. Finally it was noted that the use of computer based social networking was used to reflect the many ways needed to reach out to youth.

10.59am

8 Aaron Collier resumed his presentation, joined by Peter Cooney for Fairway Holdings Ltd (Submission No. 74). They made the following key points;

• SmartGrowth needed to keep a 50 year horizon given the array of changes that were happening around the district.

• The business and employment trends, local economy were vital for creating growth and requires affordable housing.

• Economic viability of areas identified in the settlement pattern should be a key focus as developers will focus on the economically viable options ahead of lesser economic ones. Parts of Bethlehem near Moffat Road had not been considered for residential development and could be assessed for consideration.

• In terms of a unitary plan - development codes should be merged, but they did not support the merger between Regional and District Plans.

• Council infrastructure should use targeted rates not get the developer to pay, as all costs up-front is not conducive to development.

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee Q Q 5

• Infrastructure development staging should be better considered as well as the uses of alternate technologies.

The Committee clarified a number of points which included covenants and their implications on the cost of developments. Mr Cooney noted that developers were keen to avoid low quality environments which often had flow on effects such as no garages forcing cars and as storage of household items close to the roadside. Differences were seen on approaches with site area factors versus house size aspects and the varied role Councils and Developers played on this matter. Both parties needed to work together to seek a solution. Targeted rates had so far not been shown to work in the western Bay. Some subdivisions in the city have no covenants, though it was noted most developers did not want that. The increased urban design requirements were increasing the detail design aspects for each house which has cost implications. Land was said to be scarce in Tauranga and an opportunity to shift its status (through re-zoning from business to residential) would help. Aspects of rapid market changes were seen to be reflective on financial viability of a project, and these could happen almost overnight. Cost of materials in New Zealand were high especially where there were single manufacturers for building materials. Some goods were cheaper to import and this saw the lack of competition forcing small builders to raise charges as they could not afford massive import undertakings. Examples were given of material sold from NZ overseas and then being re-imported to satisfy local demand. Finally the approach to affordable housing in Queenstown was covered where council dedicated a block to a Housing Trust which had access to low cost loans.

11.34am Chairman awaiting next submitter, short adjournment. 11.40am Chairman resumed session called Te Puke Fast Forward (Submitter No. 20).

9 Graeme Walker represented this submitter and gave a presentation starting with their support for the SmartGrowth Strategic Partners Forum and its work to date. Partner forums have worked well and if there was to be a "Rural Forum" it should be wider than just Kiwifruit growers.

• Research into ground water was needed as well as how this was to be allocated with taking into account horticultural and agricultural needs.

• The use of highways was often referenced in relation to the settlement pattern but there was also a social cohesion aspect that existed as well, with locals ending up paying for upgrades as the last one before a capacity tipping point.

• Support for the Live / Learn / Work / Play vision.

The Committee clarified aspects of the submission, noting the suggestion that Social Infrastructure should be put into another section and it should cover settlement patterns as well. Strategies to deal with PSA were covered and possible outcomes from some of the methods being trialled were raised. Also access to varied grades of water was raised, not all users needed top grade drinking water. Noted that members of the Te Puke Fast Forward could tap into other SmartGrowth forums.

11.57 am

10 Next submitter was Paul Hickson (Submission No. 32) again noting strong support for the SmartGrowth Partners forum. He made the following key points;

• The need for flexibility that would allow change. • He also noted the need to protect surf breaks. • Sports facilities were often blocked by staff by arduous planning

provisions they dealt with. • The importance of Raniguru for Te Puke and providing the labour force.


12.19 pm

• Social infrastructure and housing were important to the whole coastal area down to Whakatane.

• The census was carried out when there were no seasonal workers present, and that when they were present they placed huge pressure on the council infrastructure.

The Committee clarified a number of points including the need for work for young people and the need to keep a balance between productive land and housing. Paengaroa had grown, but people here tended to Live / Learn / Work / Play in the same area which was somewhat different to criteria used by NZTA for their traffic impact assessments. This small town was expected to grow and over 50 years could go from 2,900 people to close to 6-7000. Water existed locally and should be considered for local use first.

11 Creative Tauranga was the next submitter represented by Jennifer Pearson (Submission No. 84). Using a PowerPoint presentation she explained the background to their submission and who they were.

• Partner forums should be urged to adequately resource the actions particularly around building the community.

• Suggested moving the Social Infrastructure part ofthe Strategy into the settlement pattern section

• The Arts and cultural aspect of the area was often overlooked and there was a need to protect the Historic Heritage aspects in the region.

• Overall supportive ofthe spatial plan approach.

The Committee sought clarification on aspects of the typical organisations such as theirs and the rising back office costs, thoughts on mergers had been promoted but yet to be developed.

12.29pm Chairman adjourned for the lunch break. 1.21pm Chairman resumed the session and called the next submitter Te Puke Edge

(Submitter No. 83).

12 Mark Boyle representing this submitter noted a support for this SmartGrowth and highlighted a number of key points.

• Rangiuru should be promoted as surrounded by existing infrastructure and would be easily developed with existing employment. The development and Rangiuru requires a feasibility study. Have plans to approach the Regional Council for some up front funding, but need to complete a number of steps first. This was an important catalyst for development in the area.

• Ongoing growth in Te Puke was noted as was the need for a growth plan there.

• Links to Rotorua were seen as important and the need to attract overseas investors, bringing development and thus employment.

• The Goodness Highway covering the road between Waihi and Whakatane is promoting excursions of tourist traffic from Rotorua and longer stays.

• PSA effects significant and are being worked through.

The Committee asked several questions to obtain further information. This included questions about potential Chinese and Indian investors at Rangiuru. Once an investor's intentions were clear, councils could better target infrastructure needs and appropriateness. However the Biofuel proposal needed action much sooner. Mr Boyle was heading a local team to visit China next week. In terms of working with tourism Bay of Plenty Mr Boyle suggested this was not the appropriate forum for discussion.


22 1.44pm

13 The next submitter was Michael Pittar (Submission No. 1), who noted much of what he wanted to cover was explained by the previous submitter. In addition, he noted the role of the Port, labour force importance, Rangiuru's advantages including geotechnically sound land and as a possible location for a centrally located hospital and affordable housing.

The Committee noted the importance of the eastern arterial route. A Maketu Community plan was seen as important, the area had potential, but felt they were missing out compared to their Western neighbours and as per the previous submitter raising the area's profile in the strategy was noted.

1.58pm

14 Pukehina Beach Ratepayers Association (Submission No 33) was represented by John Cook. He commenced by accepting much of the Tauranga infill approach, but felt Pukehina was more of a lifestyle living place similar to Maketu as has access to the city and rural areas. Pukehina had expressed interests in its local water, waste water control, wildlife, Iwi relationships, and growing a sustainable economy. SmartGrowth should recognise the labour supply and capital facilities in this location. TEL completion would enhance local activities and development. Properties on the beachfront had been served with section 36 notices in respect to Tsunami risk. It was a fragile environment.

The Committee clarified the description of Pukehina, its desire for permanent residents, good schools with a need for a secondary school. Again noting the submitters desire for more positive wording and a more supportive stance on Rangiuru to attract developers. Te Puke was noted for its ability to host larger scale activities and Paengaroa as being more residential. On the aspect of high technology this was explained as Intellectual Property and high end technology industries. Finally noting the availability of infrastructure was seen as vital to growth in the area.

2.23pm

15 The next submitter was Linda Ross (Submission No. 17), who noted the age of some facilities in Paengaroa, the need for more permanent residents, growth of commercial businesses such as Comvita, and the TEL. There was a need to liaise with NZTA and seek likely development plans for roading as these would guide other developments. Shortcomings in local sports facilities and other facilities such as bus shelters were covered as well.

The Committee covered relationships between Paengaroa and Rotorua, the ease of the commute to Rotorua Airport versus Tauranga Airport. Some locals were noted as opposing growth, these were felt to be a small minority.

2.43pm

16 Rory Bragg gave the next short presentation on behalf of the Eastern Districts Rugby and Sports Club (Submission No. 80). He was seeking to maintain the domain sports ground at its present location but noted the State Highway crossing issues. The sports ground was well used and the TEL would bring more people to the area than it would take away.

The Committee questioned the State Highway crossing issue and options for consideration. Alternate sites and options will (depend on State Highway future developments.


23 2.49pm

17 The submissions from Paengaroa Community Association Incorporated (Submission No. 22) and the Paengaroa School (Submission No. 23) were presented by Mark Lendrum. Key points from their submissions included the need for coordinated community planning. NZTA outcomes affect things such as the Domain and its use. SmartGrowth should approach NZTA about its plans for that area.

The Committee clarified points around the use of the domain for residential purposes and the cost implications. Other better suited land existed in the area for residential. There was a feel for positivity in the community, but it centred around the Highway development options.

2.58pm Chairman noted no further submitters today and adjourned until Tuesday 18 June 2013, resuming at 9.00am.


SGI 3/6.3 SMARTGROWTH HEARINGS, DAY TWO 18 JUNE 2013

9.00am Chairman resumed the Hearing

Apologies Chairman noted K Smith absent, and J Cronin and T Molloy would be late. Motion to accept apologies P Thompson Seconded G Webber


Chairman Noted that he had some involvement with the Tertiary Education Partnership but had excluded himself from any discussions relating to the SmartGrov r̂th submission.

P Thompson Also noted a similar involvement with Submitter No.30

Chairman Called the first submitter for the day, Tauranga Ministers Association (Submission No. 59).


18

19

Jeremy Denmead with James Muir presented commencing with some background information and moving on to some matters raised in their submission covering social infrastructure needs, being a member of the Strategic Partners Forum and perceiving local churches as community facilities.

The Committee identified that the needs of youth was seen as an important part of this submission. The submitter confirmed they could provide a sole nominee for the Strategic Partner Forum if invited. The submitter clarified that they only represented the churches in Tauranga area and part of the bay, not the whole sub-region. Each week around 10,000 people attended church in their area and a fair proportion of these were youths, who they felt they could reach out to. There was a desire for them to be recognised in SmartGrowth both as churches and as a member of the SPF. It was noted that there were a number of ethnic based churches as well including Indian, Chinese and Samoan.

The next submitter was Maxwell Lewis (Submitter No. 8) who saw people as the greatest asset of the region and saw a strong tie-in to learning with a focus on creating knowledge centres from networking the sub-regions libraries through a shared service (BOPLASS) with the aim of sharing knowledge across communities. The world was changing fast and many old systems were becoming redundant. Should not ignore home employed people. This idea was seen as aligning with the learning component ofthe SmartGrov\/th vision.

Questions from The Committee clarified that the term knowledge would encompass all areas including with a focus on IT and innovation. It was noted that NZ libraries were thought to be exploring these ideas and the submitter noted a meeting with the local MP on this matter.

9.36am 20 Social Sector Innovation Trust (Submitter No. 30) was represented by

Sharon Hanna with Mary Stewart. They gave a background on the SSIT and its work to pull a number of smaller not-for-profit organisations together, noting the large voluntary input in the sub-region. Key points included;


10

• Support for integrated planning across local communities and organisations including Tangata Whenua groups.

• Need to consider people with disabilities and the aged. • Provision of shared services across different social sector groups. • Social housing needs for the ageing, people with difficulties, and the

disabled. • Keen to be an active partner in SmartGrowth through the Social Sector

Forum • SmartGrowth should consider aspects of community based economic

development. • Reminder that action does not always need new funding it should also

be about better use of existing initiatives.

The Committee clarified that they were members of the Social Sector Forum The value of volunteers was recognised as being unden/alued.

9.58am 21 For the next submitter Helen Gould was accompanied by Carol Anderson in

the presentation for Settlement Support Tauranga (Submitter No.2). The increase in the local communities of overseas migrants meant that there was a high presence of minority groups with varying cultural backgrounds. Highlighted the need for social cohesion with welcoming ceremonies for new migrants and ways to encourage them to participate in their communities.

The Committee sought clarification on a number of points including why councils should get involved. This issue is not about funding, but building communities and seeing migrants as part of their community. Assistance could include multi language brochures and leaflets. SmartGrowth could acknowledge this issue, encourage employers to be more welcoming and help change peoples' attitudes. The submitter also noted the images used in the SmartGrov\/th Strategy which could give more prominence to migrants. Some data was available regarding migrants but as yet there is no formal dataset. There has been an increase in newer cultural migrants such as South America with reductions traditional in English migrants.

10.20am Chairman adjourned for the morning break. 10.42am Chairman resumed the session and called the next submitter, WBOP Tertiary

Providers Forum (Submission No. 18).

22 Alastair Melvin was representing this submitter, opening with congratulations to the SmartGrowth on the draft Strategy. He gave a brief overview of their submission noting that the private education sector needed some recognition in the Strategy and the actions on tertiary education.

The Committee clarified that there was no formal relationship with the Tertiary Education Partnership and SmartGrowth and that there was currently no wider regional tertiary education collective. The key differences between private tertiary facilities and theirs was their ownership. Students in this group were by majority local and only a few overseas students. Its growth potential was noted. The Tertiary Providers Forum were interested in joining the SmartGrowth Partner Forums and noted it would be possible to have a single representative of all the tertiary education sector in the sub-region. Connections with the secondary education sector were self driven, past attempts at a forum had seen little uptake by the secondary institutions.


10.56 am 23

2G The Tauranga Elders Forum (Submission No 49) was represented by Denise Whitehead, noting at the outset their support for the Live / Learn / Work / Play vision that SmartGrowth had adopted. SmartGrowth should not neglect neighbourhood communities. With the growing proportion of older people the value of footpaths for pedestrians should not be forgotten. Also noting that many older people still worked. In respect to housing remote small boxes were not attractive.

11.12am 24

The Committee clarified aspects such as the value of safe parks and walkways, the definition of an "Older Person".

Diane Bruin appeared representing the submission from the Tauranga Budget Advisory Service (Submission No. 47). The main aspect of the submission raised was the shortage of 1 to 2 bedroom homes for the sector of the market that used their services.

The Committee raised aspects of smaller homes and the conflict with developers and the economics of that type of house. Joint ownership options were discussed with the representative who clarified that the typical market rental was around $320 per week with those tenants who were provided with support gaining $220 from WINZ plus a top-up of $100 to meet the market rental cost. Options around communal living were considered and joint tenancies could be way forward for some. For some with mental health issues a 4-person communal facility was often used to provide support. It was noted that the MSD through is client's records had a good database but it was limited in its application for other purposes. The submitter saw ongoing input into SmartGrowth as essential.

11.25am 25

11.38am 26

The Tertiary Education Partnership (Submitter No. 78) was represented by Jennifer Pearson. Noting the 3 tertiary partners in the PowerPoint who had their own goals around education, they praised SmartGrowth for its output and efforts. Submission points including urging the Strategy to carry more definitive support for priority actions and recommending a review of the Tertiary Action Plan taking a regional approach.

Questions from The Committee saw clarification of the Action Plan that SmartGrow/th had signed off on, the investment in a marine study centre by Waikato University. Finally a copy of an earlier Treasury paper was to be provided.

Bruning Farms was represented by Norman Bruning (Submitter No. 28). He noted support for the vision and direction of SmartGrowth, explaining that he saw some advantage in the councils taking a strategic look at their roles with the perspective of not what we do, but what do we enable our communities to do. Waste streams were felt to be an issue with suggestion that approaches should be made to government to lobby for consideration of the full cycle of product packaging. This was seen as vital to enable a sustainable economy. For local grov\rth he felt that Rangiuru development should be brought fonA/ard at least in part. Each of the western Bays' communities were different and should grow in their own way. In respect to forward planning, he felt that borrowing to pay for infrastructure was worthwhile as it would enable growth at a quicker rate and encourage developers. Finally he noted the limited access to the harbour and limited trailer parking for boats users.

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee O y 12

His view on the amalgamation topic was noted by The Committee and his perspective on managing waste streams in the agricultural sector was explored. He did note that there were a lot of private companies that serviced the waste needs of the rural sector. He felt SmartGrowth should be linked in to the Regional Coastal Plan and have some action matters on key topics as well.

11.54am 27 The next submitter was the Bay of Plenty Community Trails Trust

(Submission No. 36) represented by Anthony Avril. He noted at the outset that the Trust was very new and only just being established. Their aim was to promote, fundraise and then construct trails, with an aim to link Waihi to Opotiki mainly through linking up the existing trails. The Trust also seeks support for private land trails as connectors and wishes to involve the local communities to link up existing trails.

The Committee noted the existence of Bay Connections Cycling Strategy and that this Trust wanted to work with that strategy. Rotorua had taken up cycling trails and Te Puke Edge were also involved in trails. This group acknowledged that and wanted to assist co-ordination actions as well as seek links to expand trails. They did not yet have a "Plan" but as they were only 4 weeks old formally it was early days for them. Some key areas around Tauranga were explained and it was noted that a few bridges were needed in some areas to allow links of existing trails. The sale of the old rail route was noted as no longer being an option. Te Puke Trails were noted and the group were in contact with them. The name of the group recognised that is some areas trails may be shared cycles, horses and walkers.

12.10pm Chairman adjourn for lunch 1.11pm Chairman resumed hearing and called the next submitter PATAG

28 The Population Ageing Technical Advisory Group (Submission No. 21) were represented by Dr Elizabeth Spellacy. She welcomed changes that SmartGrowth had made since the first Strategy including the 4 well beings, and that the ageing population should be seen as an opportunity not just a negative impact. Tauranga could be seen as an alternative destination for people with resources, not necessarily money. Needed to develop sustainable communities and support these communities with technologically advanced services. Support for the ageing populations housing needs was emphasised and the need to cover different socio-economic groups. Compact urban form versus sprawl and the need for more infrastructure and services was noted as a positive. Recent suburb designs had a myriad of road layouts that made navigation much more difficult and confusing for the aged drivers. Also several now had no footpaths reducing pedestrian socialisation access.

The Committee asked a number of questions, one clarified the perspective of images of houses in the SmartGrov\/th Strategy. Raising awareness did not have to mean spending dollars. SmartGrowth should keep commuter rail on the long term horizon.

1.27pm

29 Bay of Plenty District Health Board (Submission No. 72) presentation was jointly provided by Helen Mason and Brian Pointon. The DHB support the vision, 5 pillars, approach to 4 well beings, the approach to a compact urban form and transport infrastructure. Key points included;

• The role of SmartGrowth as a plan to identify the key determinants of health for the western Bay

• In respect to climate change SmartGrowth should be pro-active not just adaptive.

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee ^ 13

• Support the identification of the relationship with the clinical school in the strategy.

• Noted full board support for the submission. • Community connections were important and need to look at inequalities

when looking at strategy components, ensure fairness to whole community members.

• Noted the high value of public spaces.

The Committee explored the question of strengthening ties between SmartGrowth and the DHB including by identifying areas of where outcomes from SmartGrowth may achieve similar outcomes sought by the DHB. It was suggested that his may have implications on the DHB annual plan and funding. The submitter confirmed that the DHB would welcome stronger ties with SmartGrowth and that alignment was seen as beneficial.

1.52pm 30 The next submitter was Rebecca Ryder (Submission No. 43). She repeated

the support of previous submitters for the Live / Learn / Work / Play vision in the strategy. As a member of the Southern Harbour Forum and an outrigger canoe club she suggested that planning for grov\rth was key for the strategy, and should entail planning for continued access to the harbour. There were a number of active recreation users, but a lack of access to the water in many places and with reductions of access in some pubic park areas as well. There seemed to be a focus on power boats and passive recreation users when water access was discussed. Access to deep water is limited from many locations in the harbour at low tide.

The Committee clarified the difficulties of gaining deep-water access by small manual craft. The group was in contact with other groups who were part of the forum and they had been briefed on this submission. Research on water users was limited and an annual boat ramp survey focused on power boats and trailer parking. Finally it was noted that a marine spatial plan would be supported.

2.07pm 31 Keith Catran (Submission No. 27) was the next submitter noting an interest in

industrial land he cited past land assessments based on research and technical surveys were supported. On that basis he felt that SmartGrowth did not have enough evidence to support additional industrial land in the western corridor. There seemed enough land available for industrial use out to 2051. Recent reports done for SmartGrov r̂th did not have evidence to back up their findings. Industrial land was usually the lowest cost as it had typically been compromised in some way. Often timing is the issue not availability. Finally disagreeing with the spot zoning logics as he felt it undermined urban limits that were well established.

The Committee ascertained from the submitter that many of the reports raised were known to them. Different land could be zoned as fit for a specific purpose. He felt that recommendation relating to investigating additional land in the western corridor should be deleted due to lack of evidence. He was aware of many of the transport issues associated with several sites and their locations. Finally felt that the Wairoa river area should be retained for future recreational needs and not developed.

2.33pm 32 Rotorua District Council (Submitter No. 65) were the last submitter for the day

and were represented by Mayor Kevin Winters who was supported by Mark Rawson and Rebecca Burton. The key aspects of their submission included;

• Fully support of closer coordination between their council and SmartGrowth.


23 • They wanted to be involved in any regional spatial plan reviews. Also

seeing SmartGrov r̂th becoming part of the Mayors Tri-annual meeting, noting that the Rotorua spatial plan was aimed to align with others.

• The importance of the eastern corridor was explained. How it would support the growth of nearby communities as well as service the transport corridor for goods.

• Better consideration of the international airport at Rotorua's and the desire to capture more of the international flights currently served by Auckland for local residents.

The Committee explored the Rotorua spatial plan and stages for inter-council inputs. Options for joint collaboration were canvassed and how this would apply to areas such as Paengaroa were explored. This would allow investors to see the region in a positive way. Air traffic numbers ex-Rotorua were detailed. Geothermal resources in the region were well understood. Development could happen as power generators undertook talks with the respective land owners. These local developments were not publicised and contact with the respective parties would assist understandings of any progress in the energy sector. As a potential power source for Paengaroa this was seen as very important. Finally a joint working group at both management and political levels was seen as advantageous.

3.01pm Chairman noted no further submitters today and adjourned until Wednesday 19 June 2013, resuming at 9.00am.

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee

SGI 3/6.5

30 15

SMARTGROWTH HEARINGS, DAY THREE 19 JUNE 2013


Apologies

Chairman noted K Smith and P Thomas absent, and Mayor S Crosby, J Nees and Chairman J Cronin would be late.

Motion to accept apologies P Thompson Seconded L Baldock


Chairman Noted an email that had been tabled, it is for information only. Chairman Called the first submitter for the day, Catherine Stewart.


33

9.21am

34

In highlighting aspects of her submission points Catherine Stewart (Submission No. 31). Ms Stewart emphasised her lack of support for intensification and its negative impacts on family values. She did not think that SmartGrowth had adequately engaged with the community. There was adequate land if development was approached differently. There were some alternate ways to deal with aspects of infrastructure in respect to rainwater, wastewater and solar energy use that should be explored. She felt that SmartGrowth was duplicating aspects of the city plan and strategies should be simplified. Council should follow the aspirations of the people they serve, and finally SmartGrowth should look for a more suitable name like KiwiGrov\rth.

The Committee clarified that SmartGrowth held over 40 community engagement meetings in the development of the draft strategy. The submitter argued that intensification should be driven by public demand not formal directions. The submitter felt that intensification was not supported by developers. The Southern Pipeline was unnecessary from the submitter's perspective. The Committee clarified that the Strategy did not seek to impose high density as purported by the submitter and that the Southern Pipeline was required for environmental reasons as well as for accommodating growth.

Strategic Partner Forum (Submission No. 75) was represented by Anne Pankhurst who felt the reviewed SmartGrovyth strategy was excellent. There had been high level of engagement. They had been partners in the development ofthe spatial plan.

• A new tag line may help, not a new name for SmartGrowth. She also felt that better alignment of council plans should occur to ensure that they align with SmartGrovrth.

• Ethnic diversity and demographics needed to be captured earlier in the document.

• Not losing any remaining rail corridors as they may have future roles for CBD links.


16

SmartGrowth should not follow the Auckland example on intensification planning. This needed to be better planned with coordination with developers to make it more attractive.

The Committee understood from questions that there needed to be an assessment of potential gaps in representation on the SmartGrowth Partner Forums and that this should be done by the forums themselves. They would also respond on aspects of appropriate resourcing/supporting of the forums. Lessons from Auckland needed to be heeded, getting communications right, actually hearing their community feedback. Aspects of demographics and potential future changes needed to be considered. Demographics would need to be reviewed. SmartGrowth should enable local control. Leadership was seen to be being provided by the people in the room now (council level). Finally spatial plans should emphasise the role of social (soft infrastructure) at a more local level.

9.42am 35

10.14am 36

The next submitter to appear was the Social Sector Forum (Submitter No. 77) represented by Carole Gordon and Adrienne von Tunzelmann. Starting with a background to their forum and noting opportunities for SmartGrowth to put greater emphasis on social input into economic planning. Not-for-profit organisations needed greater recognition through the Social Sector Forum, which can provide a voice to strengthen collaboration and provide an advocacy for research.

• Agreed with the wellbeing goals, more people could be engaged, there was a value in multi sector partnerships. Sub-regional waste management needed greater emphasis in the strategy.

• On the intensification issue communities should be self sustaining. The social sector should seek cost effective solutions.

• Demographics now needed reviewing. They saw benefits from the SmartGrowth multi sector forums.

• In aiming for a liveable city, note Government has limits on ability to help and communities need to take ownership. Note community solutions and the large volunteer input contributions. There were many advances from Community Council Boards. Community ownership provides an opportunity to do more with less and seek better outcomes.

The Committee clarified how SmartGrowth could influence ties with the Government, there was recognition that local initiatives was seen to be positive and we should avoid reliance on central government. Noted that MSD had not engaged in Social Sector Forum. The bottom-up approach should be valued. Integrated planning across organisations and agencies was supported. The Strategy should also recognise growing social inequality issues. Volunteers and non-profit organisations should be better understood and recognised. Immigrants were a transitional population. There was a demographic aspect versus the ageing population basis. Communications needed reviewing in line with technical and social evolutions. There was a need to reach out to more of the communities as not all were aware of SmartGrowth. Identification of key issues, who is involved, what are the values and what opportunities exist to fit into the SmartGrowth jigsaw.

Property Developers Forum (Submission No. 68) was represented by Jeff Fletcher, Jim Lochhead and Craig Batchelar. They gave a background to the forum noting that they placed a high value on the SmartGrowth partnership. Demographics and the population forecasts, dwelling occupancy rates needed to be re-assessed for the forecasts in the strategy. Similarly employment trends and related inputs to the strategy forecast also needed updating as they were

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee rj f-j 17

sourced from now old data. There was a need for Waikato and Bay of Plenty to be working together not competing. An office should be set up for SmartGrowth with a full time implementation manager. They supported a review of the settlement pattern. This should incorporate a fresh look at 3'̂ '' and 4* generation residential urban grov\rth areas and their weightings in terms of economic viability and market demand factors. The forum supported intensification, but felt it should be demographic opportunity lead, longer term and not blanket applied. More knowledge was needed about the Kermadec Trench and its associated tsunami risks, some research was ongoing. Feel that the PIM and LIM action around reporting tsunami risk on property files was premature and will create problems. Supportive of a collaborative policy office with Waikato.

Declaration of interest Cr Bennett noted that herself Chairman J Cronin, Cr P Thompson and Cr J Nees had an interest in the Tsunami subject matter through the Regional Policy Statement.

Clarifications by The Committee saw explanations of why certain sports entities had located to the Waikato and The Bay of Plenty could look at strategies to retain or lure others here. For housing affordability there was a need to consider some alternative options with targeted rates for specific areas. Aspects of exploring upfront costs for infrastructure, but paid for overtime was needed. Employment statistics could be sourced from more appropriate areas such as the IRD as opposed to the census data, which was historic only. GST returns for example were regularly updated and checked at regular intervals. Region wide data was better than the census data and avoiding over-focussing on small communities, growth needed to be seen across the region, similarly road blocks should not be placed locally, let developers find the gaps for any local intensification opportunities. Then there would be no need to force it. Covenants were not seen as adding overly to the cost of housing. SmartGrowth was seen to be informing the RPS, district and city plans, and calibrating the operating environment. Reviews are scheduled for that. Affordable housing was seen to be a collaborative effort by the various parties. Growth had slowed and a strategy change may be needed, making strategies more nimble and flexible would assist. There was a noted value in the Partner Forums, information was flowing in two directions. It is important that flags are raised early when trouble was on the horizon, the strategy report card could be an important tool in this regard. In expanding on the settlement patterns part ofthe submission the land supply was seen as around 30 years, but some context was needed on that, land areas not viable today may be ok in a few years time. There was land out there that just had not been brought to the market. In terms of density targets of 15 homes per hectare, we are not there yet but we are planning to get there by 2037. There was space for the social sector forum advice on affordable homes, but it was essentially market driven. Hamilton had shown some aspirations in its past development targets and though Tauranga did not seem to have quite got there, it was progressing well with the foundations that come before aspirations are set. Some of this effort needed to work at Government level with greater potential with staff around the table. On the matter of urban limit extensions to accommodate affordable homes, ongoing dialogue was needed as there was not consensus on this issue from within the Property Developers Forum.

10.59am Chairman adjourned for the morning break. 11.13am Chairman resumed the session and called the next submitter, Chamber of

Commerce (Submission 62).

37 The presentation by Anne Pankhurst covered the benefits of employment analysis and the submitter felt the Chamber could assist and that this should be a regional exercise. They did not see any value in changing the name of SmartGrowth as it would be a waste of time and effort. There was a need to better articulate aspects of the strategy that covered Sports, Culture, Arts and


18

Heritage. There was support for a Bay Of Plenty and Waikato combined policy office and for the idea of a subregional bank for collaboratively funding key infrastructure. The report card is key and should be completed more regularly. Volunteers' roles were very undervalued, SmartGrowth should advocate and promote that sector. Improving access around the city was important. Joint ventures should be considered on the affordable homes issue. And finally intensification opportunities in brown-fields areas was supported.

The Committee asked questions on who would carry out activities where a step up change was needed. It was felt a collaborative effort would work best with local government in an enabling role rather than putting up brick walls that stifled opportunity. Leadership in this area should start at home and in this forum. The strategy should consider people who lived and played here, but worked elsewhere. More bigger business would assist by creating promotional opportunities within the city / region. Meetings with local business leaders could occur through the Smart Economy forum.

11.28am 38 SUPA NZ (Submitter No. 37) were represented by Carole Gordon and Harry

Kiriakidis. Promotion of an age friendly city was noted as important, as was an ageing population. The importance of leadership, aspirations and innovations was needed and recognition that things to do can benefit all people. Suggesting that a key challenge for the future would be meeting the needs of an 85+ population. Cities would need to be meaningful, with liveable communities and be intergenerational. Support for the aged would mean better engagement with them looking at universal design homes and aspects of intensification. There is experience out there in this matter, we do not need to re-invent things here. Encouraging a thriving city was fine, but needed to add "age-friendly" as well. SmartGrowth should recognise the issue of social equality. Broadening who is engaged with on that matter would help. Finally tertiary education needed to consider a whole of life perspective.

The Committee clarified that many of the ageing population was financially constrained. The stigma of grumpy old people is caused through people being isolated. One option was to start communicating with the ones who were positive first and then widen out. There was a lot of experience with these aged people, research on this matter would assist, and give a better understanding of the situation for them.

11.57am 39 Freight Logistics Action Group (Submission No. 55) presentation was by

Tony Boyle started by saying he had seen other groups try to do what SmartGrowth was doing and this forum was working well. This industry used to guard secrets, now openly meet and share ideas and experiences, seems a good way to go for this forum as well. However it was noted that SmartGrowth was unilaterally focused on the Western Bay, whereas industries based here deal with matters far wider that these boundaries. He noted a correction to the strategy in that the freight studies was initiated by NZTA not UNISA. Supply and demand for ports was being assessed; Ruakura was seen as out there, but still a bit in the future at this point, maybe 30-40 years to completion. The SmartGrowth strategy should put greater emphasis on the role of the western Bay as a freight transit area. Supported continued investigation of the Kaimai tunnel.

The Committee clarified the old option of a rail link from Te Puke to Ngongataha, but at $40m /kilometre it was put into perspective. There was a situation with large numbers of containers at the port and that had to be dealt with first. Tauranga port was prime land, however it was noted that some larger city ports were blocked by inability to expand or develop, an example was

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee O 4 19

Sydney which had little commercial shipping traffic anymore. An oddity example of development was Lyttleton where containers were shipped through the tunnel before reaching the container yard 7 kilometres away. In the USA there was guidance on container transport mode - 500 miles or less it was truck, above that rail, here in NZ no such guidance exists. Kiwirail were noted to have some support in the Rangiuru area for Kawerau and developments were possibilities for a spur link to service the new proposed site if shown to have economic viability, however it was not likely to see an extension to Rotorua.. Here the high amount of logging meant trucks and the transport corridor were to the fore. Finally the need to work more closely with the Freight Logistics Action Group was noted.

12.15pm 40 Robin Grierson (Submission No. 82) gave the next presentation starting by

noting an edit to the spelling of Monsanto in the handout. Her summary of her submission focussed on the use of sprays in the local area and the interrelationships between healthy environment and healthy community. SmartGrovirth seemed to push a healthy vibrant community, but she cited an increase in spray use locally and that local councils had increased their spray use not reduced it. Finally noting reports on health issues associated with many ofthe sprays in use in the region.

Clarifications for The Committee were on the topic of Climate Change and the need for more recognition in the strategy.

12.31pm 41 Peter Simmons (Submission No. 46) summarised his submission and

supported the thrust of the SmartGrovyth strategy, however he felt that the push for a more vibrant city should include reassessment of commercial zone classification to encourage retail developments in the CBD and note the role of the peninsula corridor. Traffic issues centred around large format stores were seen as an issue. They should be avoided as they did not support a community focussed shopping facility and thus land availability for retail should be restricted outside of the CBD. On the subject of transport he felt that the situation of cars versus buses could be worked on to promote more use of buses. Finally supporting the role of business parks to foster employment growth initiatives, he suggested that land for business parks should be designated in planning documents.

The Committee asked about the aspect of parking charges in the CBD, but in response felt there were more fundamental items needing attention, adding that it would not help control the commercial use of the city and restrictions of commercial land away from the CBD should be considered. On the role of retail to the CBD it was compared to Napier where the submitter cited a thriving CBD.

12.50pm Chairman adjourned for the lunch break. 1.32pm Chairman resumed the Hearing and called the next submitter, Young Leaders

Forum.

42 Young Leaders Forum (Submitter No. 19) presented by Richard Bos (Bethlehem College), Maynard Scott (Aquinas College) and Angus Raiman (Aquinas College) coordinated by Stephanie MacDonald (BOPRC). The opening point was the growing population, especially youth in the Bay of Plenty region. There was a need to preserve land and use it efficiently, create a positive environment and build up, not out, noting the value of park areas to each community and the CBD. On the topic of transport the role of buses was covered with observations about the poor information on actual bus locations and timing, other cities, e.g. Wellington had real time updates at every bus stop

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee _ 20

on timing with systems running GPS progress for every bus. There was an opportunity to improve perceptions of reliability and timeliness. There was support for walking and cycling with a preference for cycle lanes to be next to the footpath with car parking on the outside of that. Cycle racks should be put on all buses. Rail usage should not be forgotten and may well come to the fore in the future. Rail freight was seen as a logical growth for transport. On the matter of Tertiary education, a university campus was very much needed in Tauranga, it would help to retain youth in the region adding that courses pertaining to local industry would be key to its role and success. There would be a shortage of skilled people to replace retirees in the future and wide ranging studies on commercial, marine and cultural subjects being identified. Finally, community values were felt to be vital and small local schools should be part of that.

The Committee clarified that forum members were mainly year 12 /13 with around 20 attendees though there were wide ranging invites sent out. In respect to the cycle lane placement there had been advice given to Council previously that the current layout was safer, however the submitter felt other options should be considered, even a central road cycle lane with turn facilities where road islands occurred. Thought that the safety issue was influential in the number of students cycling to school. In respect to a choice for priority points for their submission tertiary was chosen over transport though it was observed one would lead to the other. Finally on the aspect of tertiary students moving away from the region to pursue education the submitter responded that many would prefer to live at home at that time if there were suitable tertiary faciiities and courses available.

1.56pm 43 Te Puke Community Board (Submission No. 6) represented by Karyl Gunn

started with a PowerPoint on the transformation of a local Te Puke public space by the community funded group. Organisations such as St John and Plunket were now developing new facilities in the re-worked town centre. Connectivity of the town centre was noted as well as implementation of community funded works. Aerial photos were used to illustrate the developments. Communications for their projects had used both traditional means as well as an online presence, thinking outside the square was vital for progress. And with funding there was a need to seek alternate sources. Other points included;

• Water harvesting was a matter that needed more consideration, ecosystems needed protection and care.

• Recognising and connecting with people aged 16-26 who are our future. Engaging with the community is essential including migrants as there was a wide ethnic diversity in the region.

• Noting that Tourism Bay of Plenty is not seen to be working for all communities.

The Committee sought clarification on youth matters and on consultation with local Iwi.

2.14pm 44 Bob Clarkson (Submission No. 66) represented by Andrew Collins opening

with strong support for SmartGrowth. The thrust of this submission was on changing the timeframes investigation into development ofthe submitter's land. There needed to be an ability to respond to the market in a timely manner and with flexibility. There was a need for industrial land that were both large footprint as well as geotechnically suitable. The option for combinations of use of the submitters land, including affordable housing were noted. In the Coffey report there were distinctions between readily available and practically available, also healthy completion was seen as vital to this sector. The action around

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee ^ B ^^

additional business land in the western corridor should be moved to urgent, not the present medium term. In many cases affordable homes were not covered by developers seeming to favour the higher value homes, leaving a gap in the market. And on the value of lower cost homes it was seen as around $300-$350k. Options exist for this land to meet the SmartGrowth strategy with combined zoning and staging factors.

Clarifications by The Committee for this submission explored the options of mixing types of housing with prime sites close to the Wairoa River having obvious attraction values versus other sites that had no such values. Sites close to the river could have set-backs imposed as well as an aspect of urban design to protect the environmental and amenity values of the river. The submitter suggested that there was potential for around 100 affordable homes to be developed, the size of the industrial component of the site use was not quantified. The submitter suggested that the land should be bought within the urban limits first and then staging could be assessed after that. The developer had accepted that they would connect Infrastructure to the various existing facilities and he would get reimbursed later as the sites were progressed. System connection sizes was a matter for discussion, the quality of such facilities was not in question. The areas shown were about 20 hectares each with density figures of 13-15 per hectare noted. A zone with only 20 or so houses was not seen as viable. It was noted that affordable housing developments needs to be well-planned from an early stage with good urban design built into the master plan as it is not easy to retrofit affordable houses to an existing development. The aspect of industrial land and load ratings was explored, non-differential settlement being critical for warehousing where specialist machinery were utilised.

2.52pm 45 Omanawa Holdings Ltd, IMF Element and Tauriko Business Estate Ltd

(Submission No.60) jointly presented by Bryce Don and Craig Batchelar who used a PowerPoint to highlight key points. The submitter requested the urban limits be extended to encompass Belk Road in order to provide additional industrial land in the western corridor. The same request had been made through the Regional Policy Statement process, with the submission being declined and the appeal awaiting the outcome of the final SmartGrov r̂th Strategy. Sites, zoning, cost effective long term land use and traffic aspects were covered in the explanation. They did not agree with the previous submitter feeling that affordable housing development in this vicinity would compromise the SH 29 situation. There was insufficient land identified north west of the city, especially for heavy industry. Larger areas needed to be enabled to allow cost recoveries particularly as a significant amount of developable industrial land would be taken up by the Tauriko Upgrade project leaving Council short on projected development contributions. The submitter did not feel that the geotechnical stability of land in the Tauriko Business Estate was a significant factor as illustrated in the Coffee report. Land in the Tauriko corridor was able to be used to support heavy industry. In addition, heavy buildings had not been shown to generate much employment, usually they were holding heavily automated facilities. Talks with NZTA were referenced in respect to the potential aspects of bypass plans and surrounding land zonings. Finally noting that they were representing several owners with diverse backgrounds.

Here The Committee sought explanations on the changes that needed to be made to get industry to buy into the western corridor. The submitter responded that it would take time, they were dealing with a number of queries and had one deal almost completed, some sales potentials were relocation ones where clients were seeking larger sites for expansion. Competition should be put in perspective in terms of between regions as opposed to micro competition within the same corridor which would serve to drop prices to unsustainable levels. The

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee o ^1 22

local beaches, sunshine and nearby port were factors offered by the region. Comparisons to land deals in the Waikato were made with land prices similar, but flatter land, other factors influenced investment choices. Costs of works and other synergies were also noted including cut and fill situations. The Committee clarifiecj that the changes sought on urban limits won't change actual zones; that would require a plan change. Engagement with Tangata Whenua had been started with Cultural impact reports close to completion. Aspects of influence matters ranged from closeness to existing infrastructure to larger development areas to spread costs over. And finally the land area size aspect was a major influence in details such as pipe sizes for design works. Uncertainty in land areas involved made major changes to fundamental cost calculations, some certainty was seen as vital.

3.47pm 46 Te Puna Holdings Ltd presented by Richard Comyn (Submission No. 11)

who gave a brief explanation of their submission noting they were at the micro level whereas SmartGrovyth was at the macro end of the scale. The Te Puna Community plan had been reviewed and updated in 2006 with confirmation of a rural aspect.

The Committee understood from questions that draft plans would be updated with direction from the SmartGrowth strategy, including the settlement pattern review which would consider more urban development at Te Puna. Though some locals were in support of more residential development others were against it. Protection of versatile soils was accepted as an important aspect of SmartGrowth. The submitter was keen to participate in the SmartGrowth Partner Forums and identifying a member was not seen to be an issue though planning fatigue could be a factor with many activities around including the WBOPDC planning documents.

3.58pm 47 Housing Affordability Forum Christine Ralph and Bob Thorne,

(Submission No. 14) this joint presentation opened with congratulations to SmartGrowth for its strategy document. The collaborative approach and broaching of sub regional issues was welcomed. Sought an amendment the action around Universal Design Homes as PATAG (Population Ageing Technical Advisory Group) was to be seen as the lead forum for this action, not the HAF. Affordable housing should encompass practicality, sustainable targets, affordability and quality. There was support for a pilot programme and HAF prepared to be the lead agency on this action. There was also support for research into housing demands and for this to be linked to updated demographics.

The Committee clarified the forums membership and confirmed that Tauranga Community Trust was a member. In regard to the pilot project, location and thus transport links are vital elements. Economies of scale were accepted as an influence on construction costs. Research on the design and size (1 or 2 bed) would be useful as there is perceived to be a strong demand for smaller homes especially for older people. The Forum acknowledged the support of SmartGrowth in contributing to the administration of the Forum. When questioned on whether affordable housing developments should be provided for by extending the urban limits the submitter responded that the Forum did not have a formal opinion on the matter.

4.17pm Chairman no further submitters today and adjourned until Friday 21 June 2013, resuming at 9.00am.

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee 38 23

SG13/6.7 SMARTGROWTH HEARINGS, DAY THREE 19 JUNE 2013


Apologies

Chairman noted Mayor Stuart Crobsy and Chairman J Cronin absent, K Smith and T Molloy would be late.

Motion to accept apologies P Thompson Seconded J Nees


SG13/6.8

9.00am

APPEARANCES

9.26am 49

Chairman called the first submitter for the day, (Biuehaven Management Ltd -Submission No. 61). Craig Batchelar commencing with a background to this developer and at the start he noted support for the SmartGrowth work on the complex issue of tsunami Risk. There were a number of practices mentioned also notation of some well advanced overseas study on this subject. The Governments signalled changes to the RMA meant there were some risks in taking a leadership role around natural hazards. Actions on assessing risk to urban growth areas and especially developed urban areas was needed, however the submitter was concerned that the public will not have fully grasped this issue and the extent of how it may apply to established areas of Tauranga. There was an urgent need for control on developed areas as opposed to the controls that were in place for undeveloped areas. The scope of engagement on this by the various forums and parties needed to encompass the wider Bay of Plenty as far as Opotiki and Whakatane.

The Committee noted that delays in national level guidance on coastal management were seen as frustrating being on then off several times since 1992, this presented difficulties for each region having to move alone. It was noted that the recent Auckland plan had not covered this topic. It was noted that our leadership on hazard management may carry a risk of giving the impression that we have a heightened risk. There was even risk from possible outcomes from the RPS Environment Court decisions. More science on the Tsunami matter was needed, ancient historic events were known and from a civil defence aspect could end up being a reaction scenario. Some developments haci created a vertical evacuation logic however in the case of the submitters developments this did not apply as they are all single storey at this point. It was suggested that a nationally lead forum would assist. On the RPS matter, the issue of landslides was also cited as a development issue, it was second guess legislation. As the NPS on Coastal Management was on hold other options for local strategies in this area were canvassed.

Joint Agency Group- Maori Housing (Submission No. 34), this was presented by Steve Hill, using a PowerPoint he gave the background to the submission. The Papakainga toolkit that had been created was expected to be picked up by others. Trusts were working through matters well at this stage and a contract for a permanent expertise resource was well underway. There was a lot of work ahead to get things built on the ground, they had some champions, but they also needed specific expertise to make it happen. The submission is seeking support for resourcing through Partners Annual Plans. Funding is required for developments not single houses and is required over the life of the


33 24

9.57am 50

7 year programme. The submitter noted that while Maori land was available for development, the funding environment is very competitive. The Bay of Plenty is leading New Zealand in Papakainga development with the methodology used being picked up elsewhere in the country. The BERL report noted the economic benefits here just had to quantify the details. The Joint Agency Group (JAG) and the Maori Housing Forum (MHF) were achieving benefits. The pressure was on now for loans for the Trusts. The submitter noted that the Trusts worked across Local Government boundaries.

In clarification questions The Committee noted that partner (LGA) contributions sought meant about $22,500 each, however a longer term aim may be to have SmartGrowth as the single contributor. Te Puni Kokiri had put in a % share. Also there were a number of 'In-kind' contributions. There was some uncertainty noted in the future as they had to work council by council, each project has project management needs, but they had to look over the top of that at totai needs. The trusts did not pay 100% and they needed to source additional funds from elsewhere including the government. Whilst seed funding at the start was accepted it was noted that staged funding created some uncertainties. On the matter of a single region planning function it was felt that much of their work was facilitation not planning. Maori housing had wider benefits including improved health due to improved living environment. Though Maori land was provided for these projects it is access to infrastructure that is needed. The value of Maori land provided needed to be valued.

Te Runanga o Ngati Whakaue ki Maketu (Submission No. 10) were represented by Maria Horne, opening with the key aspects of the SmartGrowth Strategy being jobs and affordable housing, and linked to that, reducing migration ofthe younger members ofthe community who travelled overseas for work before returning home. Learning for life needs to start with early childhood education. Rotorua had given a good example of progress with their early childhood education which was leading to smarter people. This was something missing in the SmartGrowth Strategy. Tertiary education needed to consider who it was for if the youth kept going overseas. Demographics were important to understand this and to retain the local Maori culture. They travel to Lincoln and Massey University's to learn then come home to work. Local courses would need to be tailored to local needs and local industries, e.g. Comvita, marine resources, farming etc. Many of these were intrinsic to local cultures.

Questions from The Committee noted that Tertiary education for Maori was in the SmartGrovyth strategy. Noted that courses would need to be tailored to business and farming aspects not just sciences.

10.07am 51 Combined Tangata Whenua Forum, (Submission No. 9) a joint presentation

was made by Antoine Coffin and Karora Smith (Committee Member). Using a PowerPoint they first highlighted their support for SmartGrowth. SGIC members were invited to attend CTWF meetings where they would see the range of diverse views that were presented before the consensus views that came back to this forum. The 3 key points made were centred around facilitating employment, communicating hapu and iwi knowledge of SmartGrowth, the support for cultural awareness and opportunities for treaty settlements, emerging issues around water ownership and management, and finally support for the implementation of the Bay of Connections Maori Economic Development Strategy.

The Committee learnt that the CTWF were supportive of the tertiary partnership. Though they considered the campus facility to be the shell and it was what happened within that was important. Noted that although Maori had assets, they need to be unlocked and affiliated with the Maori youth.


10.37am 52

40 Disaffected youth have some providers to help and the Treaty settlement was part of the solution, unlocking some help was a bigger issue. On the matter of water ownership it was explained that the issues were around profits being generated from water when the water is commercialised. Maori should benefit when the water is turned into profit. Most of these issues fall to the Government rather than local councils to sort out. The CTWF Forum was supported. In regard to communicating better with iwi and hapu, it was explained that the issues are similar to a councillor reaching his electors, they simply cannot reach everybody and do not always have the support of all their constituents. Housing for Maori by built by Maori needing more investigation and continued lobby to Government.

Andrew Coker presented on behalf of Priority One (Submission No. 5) who opened with congratulations to SmartGrowth for its strategy and said the forum was more than the spatial plan, it was a vehicle for developing partnerships across the region. Collaborations were broader across the Bay, noting the second bridge; Route K and the pending tertiary Campus, marine station, export growth, the health school and city centre vibrancy were good examples. They were working with businesses looking at city centre additions, regional grovyth, residential developments and business growth. They were working with business to help them see the advantages of locating in Tauranga and its many opportunities. A number of global forums had noted a scarcity of talent.

The committee asked questions on a number of matters including the aspect of rail, though no calculations had been done it was explained that there were a growing number of locals commuting to Auckland, and that commuter rail is an appropriate aspiration for a 50 year plan. The role of Rangiuru / Paengaroa at the end of the TEL was important as it provided a good range of opportunities with excellent connectivity. There was seen to be an importance on training and education especially for the younger Maori's in the region. Agreed that employment options for the future needed to be better understood. On the matter of freight the rail ink via Hamilton to Auckland was cited as important and it was noted it had been raised by others, when asked if they would lead that topic they felt they would be better supporting other groups activities. On the matter of tertiary training they felt they could provide guidance and direction for private training providers and assist with supporting the Tertiary Providers Forum. The vision is to have a true BOP university here not just a campus of the other universities.

10.57am Chairman adjourned for the morning break. 11.16am Chairman resumed the session and called the next submitter;

53 NZTA, (Submission No. 39) Alistair Talbot with Mark Hazely made the presentation, but noted an apology from Robert Brodnax who had been delayed with traffic problems on SH 29. Opening with expressions of support for the SmartGrowth strategy, which had helped develop triggers to support decisions on around regional development and infrastructure needs. Intended land use and settlement pattern data had provided guidance and reduced the levels of uncertainty and removed impacts of unplanned grow/th and develop more efficiently and strategically. The UNISA growth forecast was accepted by NZTA and in this region funding constraints were acknowledged. The zoning and land releases for industrial use were factors for the SH29 potential development. On the topic of housing, NZTA were keen to work with SmartGrowth partners and assist where possible. Developments of the eastern corridor needed to be kept in focus, similarly the western corridor and its links to the Waikato. The central corridor across the city needed to be staged and monitored as appropriate.

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee m .M 26

Clarifications by The Committee explored earlier issues associated with potential development of the Keenan Road area such as the road connection with Tauriko and the Tauriko Bypass. It was explained that Keenan Road was a somewhat separate issue with its connections assessed in the Tauranga Urban Network study, which would assist with decision making. The settlement pattern review would assist by defining future land requirements and usage. SH29 route options were being worked on and alignments considered, SmartGrowth and NZTA could work closer as various options for both parties were developed. Changes in land use since 2004 meant the northern corridor was seen differently now and would need more research. The Northern link was currently not in the RLTP, cost constraints for this route option had not been clearly identified at this stage, however an update to SmartGrowth will be followed up on. NZTA were to update staff on current options being considered for the Tauriko Bypass prior to deliberations. Finally interactions with Iwi for the SH29 route options and Maori land access were noted as progressing.

11.54am 54 Omokoroa Community Board (Submission No. 38) represented by Glen

Whittaker opening with an expression of support for the SmartGrowth strategy he carried on to note there had been historic opposition to it. There was a sector of the community that did not want Omokoroa urbanised, however since the new Community Board were elected there had been extensive efforts to pull the community together. Despite council spending $50m on infrastructure and developers moving in, the sales had been slow with little effective growth. Development plans and infrastructure had been aligned with previous growth predictions that no longer are appropriate. Moving on, he identified the vast differences between the costs as charged by the various councils in the Bay area, which when coupled with a lack of community facilities was influencing people to move on. Council land for the planned town centre remains undeveloped, as does the small industrial land area. Finally he suggested that if Omokoroa is not to be developed as originally planned, there should be a review by SmartGrovyth to reassess the development options for the area.

Questions from The Committee were around the barriers to development at Omokoroa. The local effect of commuting to Tauranga was now evident, travel time to this hearing was noted by the submitter as an example and this was a concern noting the NZTA submission regarding the Northern Link timing. Exploring options for land allocated as industrial could be undertaken with the idea that an alternate use such as affordable housing could be considered. The community wanted to look at new ways for the future as opposed to looking back. Although the economic downturn was accepted along with its effects it was the predictions for the area that is the issue and the question now is what should be done to correct the lack of performance against those predictions.

12.19pm 55 Waihi Beach Community Board, (Submission No. 52) Murray Craig made

the presentation and noted a number of concerns. This town is a holiday destination, growth is not the issue, there was a noted decline in the permanent residents. With the low occupancy rate, confirmed by the census, there was a need to make better use of the existing housing stock rather than plan more. Rates were going up due to debt increases. Clubs were closing and the community board needed to get a better understanding of local issues. Western Bays was not seen as a grovyth area and should be dropped as such from the SmartGrov r̂th strategy. On transportation, there was nothing in the strategy to support the WaihT Community such as reference to public transport or improving economic activity. The loss ofthe golf course was seen as a factor in declining house sales. On the coastal building set back aspect he felt that council had not heeded the direction of the Environment Court to investigation long term options for coastal erosion. On the matter of Tsunami risk, the coastal

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee m Q 27

Storm surge aspect was largely ignored, the report by GNS science did not cover WaihT Beach and climate change will have an impact on the stormwater network which need to be planned for.

The Committee clarified that public transport was noted as a local issue, though the community had managed to get the Intercity bus to divert its run to include WaihT Beach. Local topography meant stormwater ended up behind the dunes, this along with climate change and rainfall predictions meant stormwater needed to be looked at. Finally on the local rates aspect there were discussions on the rate components as well as the infrastructure costs associated with developing 979 planned building lots yet only 50 were actually built, yielding little income to council.

12.33pm 56 Envirohub Bay of Plenty (Submission No. 50) was the next submitter with a

joint presentation by Mary Dillon and Namouta Pontasi. Starting with an explanation of their background they noted that the SmartGrowth strategy had been a good opportunity for them to check past actions. They noted support for the Partner Forums and the value provided by the forums to SmartGrowth. They felt there could be more diversity of representation across the Partner Forums. They suggested that the tag-line needs reassessing, possibly along the lines of building our future together. They supported the 4 well beings, the building the community aspect and the sustainable environment logic. They also support the development of an Environmental Forum to bring together the 89 environmental groups in this area as the communities have the capacity to build more support but need some principles to guide their outcomes. The vast volunteer work in the area showed how essential these groups of volunteers are locally. They felt that the Strategy document could have another principle to support the work being done by volunteers and promote empowerment of community partnerships. On the matter of residential intensification they supported this direction and the sub-region needs intensification however it should be influenced by the changing demographics in the region. SmartGrowth was doing great work and needed to take bold steps in the future.

Clarifications by The Committee noted that sustainable infrastructure such as in-built water tanks for dwellings was becoming well recognised. The matter of valuing communities efforts was raised, noting the volunteer aspects of much of the support work. Overseas efforts to quantify the value of volunteer work had been noted recently and was quantified at $18 per hour. In Seattle the Council matched the value of the volunteer effort with a monetary contribution towards the project. We need to explore options like this here and these ideas could be worked through with the various Partner Forums. Submissions to local authorities were noted as a means to push issues forward, again conversations at the grass root level were needed in most cases. They were involved in a number of local forums in smaller communities like Maketu, Te Puke and Pukehina. Most small groups supported the logics of being in a network. On the strategy the main observation was waste management and climate change were not well covered. On the matter of intensification of residential housing the SmartGrovyth strategy was seen as about right.

1.09pm 57 Jon Price (Submitter No. 63) was the next submitter. He opened with

congratulations to SmartGrowth for the strategy. He appreciated the push to grow a sustainable economy. Going on to work through the points in his submission he noted that the Tangata Whenua cultural identity was important as was building communities. He noted that young people were struggling in the present environment and needed to be given greater attention. The strategy should reconsider some of the social indicators. The ageing population was

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee A ' l 28

often overlooked, retirement villages were financially out of reach for most people. There should be opportunities to contribute to society for both young and old. Communities should come first and he urged SmartGrovyth to consider developing smart villages.

The Committee noted that going back to village logics may not be attainable with the present demographics, but its core values were accepted. Many migrants brought with them their own cultural methods and that was a matter communities needed to consider when working through local issues. The smart village concept had been developed locally and an example at Papamoa was cited. Logics of fostering communal interactions especially between young and older people were explained. This was noted as common on the Marae villages around the area.

1.49pm 58 FutureProof (Submission No. 44) The last submission for the hearing was

presented by Ken Tremaine. He congratulated SmartGrovyth on the strategy which had been well received by FutureProof He further noted that the Waikato Regional Council had agreed to him representing them for their submission today as well. Using a PowerPoint, he went through the key matters from their submission. Developments in the Waikato region were described including the expressway in the Waikato and the widespread improvements it was bringing to the freight industry. The port of Auckland is limited in terms of its capacity to expand and this coupled with the Ruakura proposal would add to the potential of the Port of Tauranga to grow. There were synergies that could be developed further with Waikato and having consistent tools in their tool kits would assist. It was important to note growth potential in all areas and that UNISA had a role across the regions. On the subject of a joint policy office, he thought that was a good idea that should be explored further as should opportunities to collaborate on transport initiatives as well as demographics. Support for the development of the western corridor would assist both regions. SH 29 as the last link from south of Cambridge to the end of the expressway, was a matter for joint regional initiatives and funding source aspects should be further explored.

The Committee asked about the rail link and were advised that a second rail tunnel was being talked about, it was important for both regions to keep this topic on the long term agenda and to note that the current planning horizon for such things was only 10 years. Many of these things had a 6 year lead in and there were hints in the GPS reports. On the subject of the joint policy office the performance of the Auckland example was questioned, there a different demographic was evident with a lot of social bias and local MP involvement. However here it was a good thing as long as people talked between themselves and gained agreed positions on initiatives. On the matter of adding value via the Tauranga port facility it was felt that the export area was very important and its transport linkages were to be considered. Again the focus would be to work with staff in the backroom and set structures in place, then target key MP's every 6-12 months. Not forgetting the value of the Mayoral forum for such collaborative discussions was important. It was noted that FutureProof was developed in 2009 and was due for a review soon.

2.06pm Chairman noted that deliberations were set down for 3, 4 and 5 of July, adjourning the Hearing at this stage.


SmartGrowth Implementation Committee Hearings and Deliberations

Minutes of Meeting No. SGI 3/06 o f the SmartGrowth Implementation Committee Deliberations held on 3, 4 and 5 July 2013 in the Council Chamber

91 Willow Street, Tauranga commencing at 9am


Bay of Plenty Regional Council Chair: J Cronin Councillors: J Nees, P Thompson

Tauranga City Council Mayor: S Crosby Councillors: L Baldock, T Molloy



In Attendance SmartGrowth Justine Brennan - Programme Manager

Bay of Plenty Regional Council M McLeod - Chief Executive F McTavish - General Manager, Strategy J Read - General Managers Personal Assistant

Tauranga City Council L Auton - Chief Executive

Apologies

Western Bay of Plenty District Council Miriam Tarris - Group Manager


45" 30

SGI 3/6.9 APOLOGIES

That it be Resolved

That apologies from Cr Paula Thompson for lateness be received

Moved Cr Molloy / Seconded Mayor Stuart

CARRIED

The Chairperson welcomed the Committee to Deliberations, following on from the Hearings held on 17, 18, 19 and 21 of June 2013. Each member received a folder containing the draft hearing minutes and copies of all the submission statements and material that was presented over the 4 days.

Also included is a copy of the Bay of Plenty Regional Council Spatial Plan report. This provides a background in terms of the wider BORPC spatial plan initiatives.

The Chairman noted that today's deliberations will be adjourned at 1.30pm in respect of Councillor Maureen Waaka's Tangi and will reconvene at 9am on Thursday 4 July.

SG13/6.10 PRESENTATION - STRATEGIC TRANSPORT FOR THE WESTER BAY OF PLENTY

The Committee received a PowerPoint presentation from Richard Hurn, Alistair Talbot (NZTA) and Bron Healey (BOPRC), giving a briefing on Transport.

Kev Points

• Summarised how the land transport funding system works • Outlined the National Land Transport Programme 2012-15 priorities

and the outcomes being sought from investment • Set out the regional planning and priorities for transportation • Outlined the NZTA Investment Approach • Emphasised the need to work together as one network • Investment signals from policy to action • NLTP 2012-15 in the BOP Region • Changes to the Land Transport Management Amendment Act 2013 • Key purpose is to set out the regions land transport objectives, policies

and measures for at least 10 financial years • Development by the Regional Transport Committee/BOP Regional

Advisory Group • RLTS Vision - Best transport systems for a growing economy and safe

and vibrant Bay lifestyle • RLTS Strategy Option - Optimised Transport System. • RLTP top 10 priority projects from a Regional Level. • Regional Priorities - four key areas 1. Western Bay of Plenty Growth 2. Eastern Bay of Plenty Route Security 3. Rotorua Growth

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee ^ r • 31

4. Regional Transport Infrastructure maintenance.

NZTA noted that the planning work done in collaboration with the three councils meant they have been able to identify the function of each purpose of each corridor for transport.

Comfortable that the transport recommendations in the Strategy aligns with the strategic regional transport direction that is directed in RLTS and the RLTP.

In response to questions thev advised as follows

• Leadership is about Implementation. SmartGrowth is taking a long term political view. Need to hang onto this and hope that constituents hold us to account to deliver the aspirational vision. Need to go for long term 50 year vision, then have medium term 25 year outlook (2 decades) which aligns with delivering long term settlement pattern vision. Then GPS becomes less important, it will always be a tactical and political funding mechanism.

• 18 months ago the key outcome for SH29 was freight efficiency but as the SmartGrowth review has progressed and NZTA has become aware of business land needs within the western corridor, and area rethinking their approach to delivering outcomes. NZTA acknowledged the importance of this corridor in the Settlement Pattern.

• The Settlement Pattern review needs to clearly signal what type of land use will be provided particularly in the western corridor. NZTA need SmartGrowth to provide confirmation of land use in this corridor.

• It was noted by the Committee that SmartGrowth needs to know the details of the SH29 strategy and the preferred route of the Tauriko bypass in order to make those decisions during the Settlement Pattern review

• Agreed that these strategies can't develop in isolation, all part of decision making and need to occur in parallel

• NZTA are really interested in the hard data, the evidence and the triggers for infrastructure. The clearer that is, the better direction it gives to NZTA and RLTS and more likely to get traction. The Settlement Pattern review will give the opportunity to get clear evidence and triggers aligned.

• On taking over land for Rotorua Eastern Arterial, NZTA noted there needs to be a solution to the traffic issues and only have 2 options, either make road wider or find another way around. Signals are that people would prefer to find another route and they are working with communities one step at a time.

• NZTA need certainty from SmartGrowth but the settlement pattern review project would need to be undertaken in partnership using shared evidence base.

• NZTA noted that business land would be the priority impact on the residential component ofthe Settlement Pattern.

• NZTA believes there is an appropriate level of safety noted in the documentation.

The Chairman thanked the presenters for their information.

Moved Mayor Ross / Seconded Cr Nees

SG13/6.11 HEARINGS - OBSERVATIONS

Prior to commencing deliberations the Chairman noted the quality of the submissions that were received; the effort put in by the submitters and the large number in support of the general direction and approach that SmartGrowth is taking with the Strategy.

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee . „ 32 4 ; - ' — ^ - ' •• — •

The Chairman made the followinq observations and comments from the hearings process

• Reinforcing the need for sub-regional leadership to take a proactive approach rather than waiting for direction form Wellington.

• Noting the mandate for SmartGrowth to play this role, provide leadership, set the direction and to hold a long-term view. Visions and aspirations are key aspects of the strategy and submitters look to the partnership in terms of the longer term view and are keen to support the partnership and where the strategy is heading.

• SmartGrowth needs to SmartGrowth can't back away from the challenges, this is part of excitement and commitment in terms of working through the issues and associated thinking and requires looking at matters differently from the past.

• Strategy is not just about the partners, it is wider and the support of other agencies in implementing the strategy is clear.

• There are a number of draft actions in the strategy that highlight the need for creative thinking about the challenges of funding.

• Consider the full range of ideas. The District Health Board in seeking alignment in their annual plan and the direction that SmartGrowth is heading.

• Money is not a reason to have no vision and not do things. Emphasises the importance of creative thinking, and how do we can achieve these actions.

• Finally, wider regional and upper North Island approach has garnered a lot of support during the submission process.

The Committee supported the Chairman's comments and noted that the vast majority of submitters were in support of SmartGrowth and made positive suggestions on how things could be improved. The submission process showed the passion people have for their own communities, and what their future holds was noted.

The Committee made the followinq observations and comments from the hearinqs process

• The Committee congratulated The Chairman and the SmartGrowth Programme Manager on the process of opening the door to the wider community.

• Encouraged by the level of positivity around the community, and there understanding that it is more than just an urban planning tool, ifs a spatial plan across the four well-beings.

• The suggested amendments have reflected that we have listened to the submitters and what they were saying.

• An understanding that there is still a lot of work to do. • The next 12 months are critical, when looking at the way forward. • SmartGrovirth is reaching a new stage in its evolution and there is a lot of

pressure on us to achieve. It is about working together and working with the community through Partner Forums.

• Nimbleness to adjust and strengthen as we go forward, another big piece of work, the way we operate is going to evolve too.

• How we can continue to strengthen SmartGrowth without leaving it to another review to fine tune it the right way.

• Encouraged by the signals from the DHB around the possibility of integrating with their programmes.

• How we think about the implementation and the opportunities to make tweaks and adjustments to deliver everything the Strategy is capable of


• Work innovatively with the community to provide the solutions and SmartGrowth to facilitate this

• The Committee agreed it is good to hear from the critics as well. It was noted the number of supporters far outweighed the critics.

• Combined Tangata Whenua Forum (CTWF) thanked the Committee, and the SmartGrowth Programme Implementation Manager for helping in this process,

• Positive to see that the submitters accepted CTWF as part of this review. • SmartGrowth needs to keep an eye on Auckland and Christchurch. Our

type of spatial plan is different to a legislatively required spatial plan. Our spatial plan has an aggregated means of addressing the communities at large. Ifs not amalgamation its aggregation.

The Chairman thanked the Committee for their discussion points.

The meeting adjourned at 10.15am for morning tea The meeting reconvened at 10.30am

SGI 3/6.12 SETTLEMENT PATTERN REVIEW

Justine Brennan, SmartGrowth Programme Manager gave The Committee a brief summary of the Settlement Pattern Review. This was after questions raised by The Committee around the submissions points, particularly the points that pertain to smaller communities and urban growth areas.

Kev points

• A priority action of the strategy and a separate project. • Undertake the work with a high level of community engagement. • Need to look at how the Settlement Pattern fits into the Region and the

Upper North Island • The demographic analysis is essential to the Settlement Pattern review. • Strategy will be updated following the Settlement Pattern review • Staff are yet to develop a project plan.

SG13/6.13 DELIBERATIONS

Refer to the 'Summary of Submissions and Responses" from the SmartGrowth Hearings on June 17, 18, 19 and 21, Appendix 1 of the Agenda.

The SmartGrowth Draft Strategy Deliberations began at 10.30am.

Updates are reflected in the 'Submission Points by Topic - Version 2 (Updated at SG Deliberations' document "APPENDIX B".

These will be signed off at the next SGIC meeting on 31 July 2013.

The meeting adjourned at 1.30pm Wednesday 3 July 2013 The meeting reconvened at 9.00am Thursday 4 July 2013

Before moving into Deliberations the Committee had a free and frank discussion on various topics.

The key comments included


43 Demographic Proiect

• The need to assess long term trends as opposed to short term blips • Key to get assurance that population decline projections • In danger of spending money on detailed infrastructure planning before

addressing the crucial issues such as decline in growth • Need shared data to provide a shared evidence base - not just for

Council use but ensure it is used by all implementation partners and other external agencies.

Settlement Pattern Review

• Scope of settlement pattern need to maximise our existing investments • Include review of business land requirements including Wairakei,

Omokoroa • Need to look at the implementation tools and how the Settlement

Pattern review project will be bought into the planning frameworks. • Demographics of ageing population need to be overarching the project. • Project needs to be based on what's best for the sub region as a whole

rather than jurisdictional boundaries. • Live Work and play is about choices and lifestyle so we need to do

residential first and then on that basis go back to industrial areas and have another look at them on the basis of confirmed residential areas. .

Wairoa Valley (Tauriko west) Strategic Study

• Need to do strategic study of this area without proposing any particular outcome for use of this land

• Need to look at infrastructure requirements and triggers • Need input from NZTA • Agreed to identify in Strategy that this area will be subject to a strategic

study to inform the Settlement Pattern review but not predetermine residential land use.

Funding

National infrastructure programme, central government may give local government more tools. 89 recommendations resulted from report, 2 have been actioned. There is a problem around local government not using the existing funding tools that they have. Need to lobby central government collectively around how we fund infrastructure. Need to incorporate post Treaty settlement funding arrangements. Need to do the settlement pattern review first and then cost it and then look to closing the funding gap. Clarified that this action in the Strategy is not just about hard infrastructure, it would also cover social and community infrastructure. It is unlikely that we will afford to put in any new hard infrastructure. We need to look at how to best leverage off the existing investment.

Live/Work and Plav

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee »T n 35

•

• Need to redefine what level we want to apply live/work/play. It was at more of a corridor scope but could be reassessed from a sub-regional perspective?

• This revised approach should be applied to the settlement pattern review.

• People should be able to make choices based on preferences and lifestyles as to where they live, work and play.

Amalgamation

• We need to be thinking of implementing the strategy as if TCC and WBOPDC were amalgamated as it will happen in the 50 year timeframe of SmartGrowth.

• Agreed with need to have the discussions at a partner council level and then at SmartGrowth. Incoming Councils should put this on their agenda for the upcoming term while they have the opportunity to put options into the electoral commission.

• We should be assessing our long term asset management plans and management structures and assess whether we can do this better over the next 30 years. We are currently working together for the same community.

• Mayors of the region are currently having these conversations already which may provide a leaver for change. Also legislative change including the powers the Mayors now have through LGA changes, they now have enhanced powers to lead the charge in terms of these outcomes. Change is coming particularly around what is best delivered at a mega level vs local community level.

• Local government is in evolution, reforms will see a changing operating environment. Should be focusing on best outcomes for the Bay of Plenty and what the function of local government will be. Because we have a solid partnership we will be in a good space to deal with it.

• This conversation will also affect Rotorua and Eastern Bay also so it is a bigger conversation than Western Bay. We should not be moving on this with any urgency. Comfortable that through SmartGrowth we are in a good space to react if we need to.

Plan Alignment

• Noted that we are almost there with SmartGrowrth and should not back away from completing the project.

• Should include integration with post settlement iwi management plans and local government and RMA reforms

• Need to ensure that there is a good alignment between IMG and governance. IMG need to be very clear on the expectation of SGIC.

Regional Spatial Plan

• Project scope is to pull together all the sub regional spatial plans and will look at identifying priorities across the region in order to have discussions with central government.

• Important that regional initiative doesn't slow down or take away from SmartGrowth and its place as the spatial plan for the western Bay.

Implementation - Post adoption

• Important to have a full time resource post adoption to ensure progress continues to be made.

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee f- ^ 36

o l • Need to ensure that the message of engagement with communities in

appropriate ways is very clearly articulated at IMG level. • Have a discussion about changing the way we work together and

include the SmartGrowth Partner Forums. IMG should be discussing how the SmartGrowth structure looks like when we have all the forums in place.

5.00pm The Chairman adjourning the meeting and noted that the next SGIC was set down for 31 July which would conclude meeting SGI3/07 (hearings and deliberations).



Minutes of Meeting No. SGI 3/06 o f the SmartGrowth Implementation Committee held on 31 July 2013 in the Council Chambers, Tauranga City Council commencing at

1.00pm


Bay of Plenty Regional Council Councillors: J Nees, P Thompson

Tauranga City Council Mayor: S Crosby Councillors: L Baldock, T Molloy



In Attendance SmartGrowth J Brennan - Programme Manager

Bay of Plenty Regional Council Mary-Anne Macleod - Chief Executive

Tauranga City Council G Poole - Chief Executive C Jones - Deputy Chief Executive

Western Bay of Plenty District Council M Taris - Group Manager

Others J Read - SmartGrovyth Administrator

Apologies Bay of Plenty Regional Council Chairman - J Cronin

SG13/6.14

53 The Chairman welcomed the Committee to the final part of the Hearings and Deliberations for the Draft SmartGrovyth Strategy. Today is a follow on from Deliberations held on the 3, 4 and 5 July 2013.

Meeting reconvened at 1.00 pm

The Committee noted two tabled documents by the SmartGrowth Implementation Manager

1 Letter dated 23 July 2013 to the Regional Spatial Plan Leadership Group

2 Updated Draft SmartGrovyth Strategy 2013 - Incorporating amendments from submissions. July 2013.

APOLOGIES

That it be Resolved

That apologies from Chairman Cronin be received

Moved Cr Thomas / Seconded Mayor Paterson

CARRIED

SG13/6.15 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - SMARTGROWTH IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE (SG13/05- DATED 22 MAY 2013)

The Committee considered the minutes of the SmartGrowth Implementation Committee (SGI3/05) dated 22 May 2013 as circulated with the agenda.

That it be Resolved

That the minutes of the SmartGrowth Implementation Committee (SG13/05) dated 22 May 2013 is confirmed as a true and correct.

Moved Cr Webber / Seconded Mayor Crosby

CARRIED

The Chairman noted a number of matters the committee will need to report back on and these will be highlighted in the SmartGrovyth Programme Manager, presentation "Appendix A " today.

The Chairman confirmed the upcoming workshops next week with the four SmartGrowth Partners, followed by the SGIC meeting and all the partner councils on 30 August. With this in mind, a "working-party" was sought to take on any last minute changes or recommendations to the Strategy from the individual partner workshops. There may be matters raised that could be discussed in the "working party" ready for the 30 August. The Chairman is looking for some Governance assistance.

Justine confirmed that all partner Council's and CTWF will receive a copy ofthe updated version ofthe Draft Strategy well prior to the workshops.

54 39

SmartGrowth Implementation Committee - June/July 2013

SGI 3/6.16 SUMMARY OF SUBMISSIONS AND RESPONSES

Justine covered the changes from the last meeting to the summary of submissions and responses in Appendix B - Submission Points by Topics - Version 3 (Updated following SmartGrowth Deliberations). This document was amended throughout the meeting to reflect SGIC comments.

Key points raised by the Committee included:

• Concern with some actions being are moved to principles particularty around age-friendly and live-able cities. Need to retain the intent ofthe action.

• It was confirmed that the maps should be redrafted so as not to spatially identify any areas in Te Puna, Wairoa (Tauriko west) and Paengaroa that will be subject to strategic investigation. The Committee preferred to replace with an asterix and reference back to the relevant action in the Strategy which will direct the strategic investigation to occur. Committee requested that maps be replaced prior to being sent to full Partner Councils for workshops.

• On Tsunami and Liquefaction, the Committee agreed the wording is more appropriate.

• Implementation of the SmartGrowth Strategy. Comment was made that the SmartGrowth Strategy is the overarching document. The Partner Councils funding and planning frameworks should follow in behind and be directed by SmartGrowth. There is a need to ensure a good level of awareness of this at the full Partner Council workshops otherwise this project has simply been an exercise. We all need to take responsibility for ensuring the SmartGrowth message filters through each ofthe individual organisations.

The four SmartGrowth Partners will have the opportunity to give further feedback on the Strategy over the following week at the Partner Council workshops.

The Committee also discussed a new tagline and logo options. It was agreed that these will be work-shopped using the SmartGrowth Partner Forums as a focus group. Comments received by the committee on the options provided during the presentation included:

• Majority in favour of "Shared Pathway to the future"

• Some liked "a Shared pathway to a thriving Western Bay

• The blocks are good, but did not necessarily fit with the concept of a "Pathway"

SGI 3/6.17 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY ACCORD BILL

It was noted by staff that the Select Committee Report on the Housing Affordability Accord Bill has just been reported back to Parliament. The following points were significant:

• A small number of edits have been made

40 ^ * ^


• Currently in the dispute resolution process

• There were no changes to Schedule 1 so that the Bill remains focused only on Auckland.

• Neighbouring landowners and infrastructure providers to be more informed.

• Comments made by other Parties included that the Bill is not adequately tackling the issue of increasing supply at the affordable end ofthe market.

Justine confirmed she review whether any changes to submission responses are required as a result ofthe Select Committee report.

SG13/6.18 PROCESS TO FINAL STRATEGY APPROVAL

Justine outlined the process to finalise the Strategy as follows;

• The Committee heard submissions on the draft Strategy during the period of 17-21 June.

• The Committee reconvened to consider the response to the submissions during the deliberations on 3 - 5 July 2013.

• Today approval is sought by the Committee on the recommendations in response to submissions as detailed in Appendix B - Submission Points by Topics - Version 3 (Updated fol lowing SmartGrowth Deliberations). Following on from this, the Draft SmartGrowth Strategy will have its final workshop with all the four partner councils.

The Committee agreed to have a "working party" to cover any further changes or issues that may arise from these workshops, in preparation for final sign off of the SmartGrowth Strategy on the 30 August 2013. The "Working Party" to be represented from each partner as follows;

Mayor Stuart Crosby

Councillor Garry Webber

Councillor Jane Nees

Councillor Raewyn Bennett

Independent Chair

That i t be Resolved


1. Agree to have a working party to cover any issues that may arise from the workshops with individual SmartGrowth partners.

Moved Cr Thompson/Seconded Cr Webber

CARRIED

41 5C


That it be Resolved


2. Receives the report ent i t led "Responses to submiss ions and amendments to Draft Strategy'

3. Receives submiss ions in respect o f the draft SmartGrowth Strategy distr ibuted separately in a bound volume pr ior to the hearings.

4. Receives the draft minutes f rom the hearings and deliberations attached as Appendix A and notes that these wi l l be f inal ised and considered at the 30 August meeting.

5. Receives the report 'Summary o f submiss ions and responses' attached as Appendix B.

6. Approves the recommendat ions in responses to submiss ions as detai led in the 'Summary of submissions and responses' report subject to any amendments arising at the meeting.

7. Receives the report ent i t led 'Schedule of Amendments to Draft SmartGrowth Strategy' translating the responses f rom submiss ions into changes to the draft Strategy attached as Appendix C.

8. Approves the changes to the Draft SmartGrowth Strategy identi f ied in the 'Schedule o f Amendments to Draft SmartGrowth Strategy' subject to any amendments ar is ing at this meeting.

9. Notes the process o f agreeing and incorporat ing amendments with SmartGrowth Partners and f inal ising the SmartGrowth Strategy as detai led in this report.

Moved Cr Webber / Seconded Cr Thomas

CARRIED

SG13/6.19 REGIONAL SPATIAL PLAN

10. Notes the SmartGrowth IMG (Implementation Management Group) request to be recognised as the formal l ink between SmartGrowth Partner Counci ls and the regional spatial p lanning project.

Moved Cr Nees / Seconded K Smith

The Chairman took the opportunity to formally acknowledge and thank all the submitters for their passion, their positive-ness, the desire and the thinking that

42 57


went into the submissions. There were 83 submitters and a significant number of these were positive and really wanting to contribute. This is important to the SmartGrowth process, and acknowledgement will be given when we respond to each ofthe submitters.

The Chairman also thanked The Committee for asking creative questions. During the hearings, deliberations and today's meeting the Committee has stayed on the case and the questions that were asked have been very good.

The Chairman acknowledged Justine for her work and Jackie Read, Committee Administrator for the smooth running of the heanngs. Also the partner staff who have been significantly involved, including in the eariy community engagement phase and the ability to have early input in the process and to help shape the strategy. Also thank you to the Partner Forums and their contribution which has led to further forums being established.

Thank you all and well done. We are not quite finished yet, but we are getting there.

The Committee closed with thanking Chairman Wasley for Chairing and Justine Brennan for guiding members through this process.

The meeting concluded at 3.05 pm

Confirmed as a true and correct record

Q ^ - 4 ] ^ ^

W Wasley Independent Chairperson

30 August 2013

Date

10 SmartGrowth Implementation Committee -...

Documents

Transcript of 10 SmartGrowth Implementation Committee -...