10 Lean Systems
-
Upload
varun-khanna -
Category
Documents
-
view
21 -
download
0
description
Transcript of 10 Lean Systems
-
OPM 2, 2013-15, Term 3 Prof Kedar P. JoshiT. A. Pai Management Institute, Manipal
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Lean Systems
Lean systems affect a firms internal linkages between its core andsupporting processes and its external linkages with its customers andsuppliers.
One of the most popular systems that incorporate the generic elementsof lean systems is the just-in-time (JIT) system.
The Japanese term for this approach is Kaizen. The key to kaizen is theunderstanding that excess capacity or inventory hides processproblems.
The goal is to eliminate the 8 types of waste.
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Eight Wastes or MUDA
Overproduction
Inappropriate Processing / Process waste
Waiting
Transportation
Motion
Inventory
Defects
Underutilized Employees
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Eight Wastes
1. Overproduction
Manufacturing an item before it is needed.
Building more than what is demanded.
2. Inappropriate Processing / Process waste
Using expensive high precision equipment when simpler machines would suffice.
Excessive or redundant operations.
3. Waiting
Wasteful time incurred when product is not being moved or processed.
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Eight Wastes
4. Transportation
Excessive movement and material handling of product between processes.
5. Motion
Unnecessary effort related to the ergonomics of bending, stretching, reaching, lifting, and walking.
Unnecessary or excessive human activity.
6. Inventory
Excess inventory hides problems on the shop floor, consumes space, increases lead times, and inhibits communication.
Building more to protect against system problems
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Eight Wastes
7. Defects
Quality defects result in rework and scrap, and add wasteful costs to the system in the form of lost capacity, rescheduling effort, increased inspection, and loss of customer good will.
8. Underutilization of Employees
Failure of the firm to learn from and capitalize on its employees knowledge and creativity impedes long term efforts to eliminate waste.
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Eight Wastes or MUDA : Examples
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Eight Wastes or MUDA : Examples
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Eight Wastes or MUDA : Examples
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement with Lean Systems
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Supply Chain Considerations
Close supplier ties
Look for ways to improve efficiency and reduce inventories throughout the supply chain
Supplier proximities Rationalizing number of suppliers Close supplier relationships
JIT II
In-plant representative Benefits to both buyers and
suppliers
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Supply Chain Considerations
Reduce the average level of inventory Pass through system faster (MLT) Create uniform workload and prevent overproduction Increase setup frequency
Small lot sizes
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Supply Chain Considerations
Initial Setup Time
Separate setup into preparation, and actual setup, doing as much as possible while the
machine/process is running (save 30 minutes)
Move material closer and improve material handling (save 20 minutes)
Standardize and improve tooling
(save 15 minutes)
90 min
60 min
45 min
25 min
15 min
Eliminate adjustments
(save 10 minutes)
Training operators and standardizing work procedures (save 2 minutes)
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 513 min
Step 4
2. Small lot sizes
Set up time reduction
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Process Considerations
1. Pull method of work flow
Push method
Pull method
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Process Considerations
1. Pull/Push method of work flow
CENTRAL OPS. PLANNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Work
centreDEMANDWork
centre
Work
centre
Work
centre
Instruction on what to make and where to
send it
FORECAST
OR
PULL CONTROL
Work
centre
Work
centre
Work
centre
Work
centre DEMAND
Request Request Request Request
Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery
PUSH CONTROL
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Process Considerations
1. Pull method of work flow
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Process Considerations
1. Pull method of work flow
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Process Considerations
2. Quality at the source
Jidoka
Poka-yoke
Andon
Statistical process control Worker involvement Inspect own workQuality circles
Immediate feedback
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Process Considerations
2. Quality at the source
Jidoka
Andon
1 2 3
8
4
9
5
10 11
6 7
12 13 14STOP BUTTON(STOP THE L INEAUTHOR ITY)
STOP BUTTON(STOP THE L INEAUTHOR ITY)
Abnormality
Station 5
Team Leader
45
Jidoka means "autonomation" or "automation with a
human touch."
Detect a problem and stop production automatically
rather than continue to run and produce bad output.
The principle's origin goes back to 1902 when Sakichi
Toyoda invented a simple but ingenious mechanism
that detected a broken thread and shut off an
automatic loom.
That invention allowed one operator to oversee the
operation of up to a dozen looms while maintaining
perfect quality.
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Poka- Yoke
Error-proofing, also known as Poka-Yoke, is a technique of preventing errors by designing the process, equipment, and tools so that an operation cannot be performed incorrectly.
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
An Equipment on ANDON
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Process Considerations
3. Uniform workstation loads
Takt time
Heijunka
Mixed-model assembly
Lot size of one
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
AAAAA BBBBB BBBBB DDDDD EEEEE
AAAAA BBBBB BBBBB CCCCC EEEEE
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
AABBBB AABBBB AABBBB AABBBB AABBBB
CDEE CDEE CDEE CDEE CDEE
5 units
5 units
10 units
Weekly Production Required
Traditional Production Plan
JIT Plan with Level Scheduling
A
B
C
D
E
10 units
20 units
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Process Considerations
4. Standardized components and work methods
StandardizedWork
Detail of each Process Step
Detail of the Elementsof each Process Step
Work Element Sheet
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Process Considerations
5. Flexible workforce/ Resources
Capable to do many different things with minimal setup time
Workers assume considerable responsibility
Cross-trained to perform several different duties
Trained to also be problem solvers
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Process Considerations
6. Automation
7. Total Preventive Maintenance (TPM) Scheduled & daily PM
Operator performs PM
Knows machines
Responsible for product quality
8. Five S (5S) practices
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
1. Five S MethodTABLE 8.2 | 5S DEFINED
5S Term 5S Defined
1. Sort Separate needed from unneeded items (including tools, parts, materials, and paperwork), and discard the unneeded.
2. Straighten Neatly arrange what is left, with a place for everything and everything in its place. Organize the work area so that it is easy to find what is needed.
3. Shine Clean and wash the work area and make it shine.
4. Standardize Establish schedules and methods of performing the cleaning and sorting. Formalize the cleanliness that results from regularly doing the first three S practices so that perpetual cleanliness and a state of readiness are maintained.
5. Sustain Create discipline to perform the first four S practices, whereby everyone understands, obeys, and practices the rules when in the plant. Implement mechanisms to sustain the gains by involving people and recognizing them via a performance measurement system.
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Designing Lean System Layouts
1. Line flows recommended
Eliminate waste
Workstations in close physical proximity to reduce transport & movement
2. One worker, multiple machines (OWMM)
3. Group technology
Group parts or products with similar characteristics into families
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
One Worker Multiple Machines (OWMM)
One-Worker, Multiple-Machines (OWMM) Cell
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Drilling
D D
D D
Grinding
G G
G G
G G
Milling
M M
M M
M M
Assembly
A A
A A
Lathing
Receiving and
shipping
L
L L
L L
L L
L
(a) Jumbled flows in a job shop without GT cells
Process Flows Before and After the Use of GT Cells
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
(b) Line flows in a job shop with three GT cells
Cell 3
L M G G
Cell 1 Cell 2
Assembly
area
A A
L M DL
L MShipping
D
Receiving
G
Process Flows Before and After the Use of GT Cells
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Receiving postKanban card for
product 1Kanban card for
product 2
Fabrication cell
O1
O2
O3
O2
Storage
area
Empty containers
Full containers
Assembly line 1
Assembly line 2
Single-Card Kanban System
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Storage
area
Empty containers
Full containers
Receiving post
Kanban card for product 1
Kanban card for product 2
Fabrication
cellO1
O2
O3
O2
Assembly line 1
Assembly line 2
Single-Card Kanban System
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Storage
area
Empty containers
Full containers
Receiving postKanban card for
product 1
Kanban card for
product 2
Fabrication
cellO1
O2
O3
O2
Assembly line 1
Assembly line 2
Single-Card Kanban System
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Storage
area
Empty containers
Full containers
Receiving postKanban card for
product 1
Kanban card for
product 2
Fabrication
cellO1
O2
O3
O2
Assembly line 1
Assembly line 2
Single-Card Kanban System
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Storage
area
Empty containers
Full containers
Receiving postKanban card for
product 1
Kanban card for
product 2
Fabrication
cellO1
O2
O3
O2
Assembly line 1
Assembly line 2
Single-Card Kanban System
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Storage
area
Empty containers
Full containers
Receiving postKanban card for
product 1
Kanban card for
product 2
Fabrication
cellO1
O2
O3
O2
Assembly line 1
Assembly line 2
Single-Card Kanban System
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Storage
area
Empty containers
Full containers
Receiving postKanban card for
product 1
Kanban card for
product 2
Fabrication
cellO1
O2
O3
O2
Assembly line 1
Assembly line 2
Single-Card Kanban System
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
KA
NB
AN
Part N
um
ber:
12
34
56
7Z
Lo
ca
tion
:A
isle
5
Bin
47
Lo
t Qu
an
tity:
6
Su
pp
lier:
WS
83
Cu
sto
mer:
WS
116
1. Each container must have a card
2. Assembly always withdraws from fabrication (pull system)
3. Containers cannot be moved without a kanban
4. Containers should contain the same number of parts
5. Only good parts are passed along
6. Production should not exceed authorization
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Number of Containers
Two determinations
Number of units to be held by each container
Determines lot size
Number of containers
Estimate the average lead time needed to produce a container of parts
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Number of Containers
WIP = (average demand rate) (average time a container spends in the manufacturing process)+ safety stock
WIP = kc
kc = d (w + p )(1 + )
k =d (w + p )(1 + )
c
where k = number of containersd = expected daily demand for the partw = average waiting timep = average processing timec = number of units in each container = policy variable
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Number of Containers
Formula for the number of containers
k =Average demand during lead time + Safety stock
Number of units per container
WIP = (average demand rate)(average time a container spends in the manufacturing process) + safety stock
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Determining the Appropriate Number of Containers
EXAMPLE 8.1
The Westerville Auto Parts Company produces rocker-arm assemblies
A container of parts spends 0.02 day in processing and 0.08 day in materials handling and waiting
Daily demand for the part is 2,000 units
Safety stock equivalent of 10 percent of inventory
a. If each container contains 22 parts, how many containers should be authorized?
b.Suppose that a proposal to revise the plant layout would cut materials handling and
waiting time per container to 0.06 day. How many containers would be needed?
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Determining the Appropriate Number of Containers
SOLUTION
a. If d = 2,000 units/day, p = 0.02 day,
= 0.10, w = 0.08 day, and
c = 22 units
k =2,000(0.08 + 0.02)(1.10)
22
= = 10 containers220
22
b. Figure 8.5 from OM Explorer shows that the number of containers drops to 8.
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Application 8.1
Item B52R has an average daily demand of 1000 units. The averagewaiting time per container of parts (which holds 100 units) is 0.5 day.The processing time per container is 0.1 day. If the policy variable isset at 10 percent, how many containers are required?
k =d (w + p )(1 + )
c
= 6.6, or 7 containers
=1,000(0.05 + 0.01)(1 + 0.1)
100
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Other Kanban Signals
Cards are not the only way to signal need
Container system
Containerless system
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Other Kanban Signals
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Benefits of JIT Manufacturing
Shorter lead times
Lower defect rates
Less raw materials inventory
Less WIP inventory
Less finished goods inventory
Enhancements in system flexibility
Reduction in floor space requirements
Improvement in communication
Improvement in employee morale
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
JIT can be effective If
Production system has a flow structure
Set up times are low
Demand is stable
High volume, Repetitive Manufacturing
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Value Stream Mapping (VSM)
Value stream mapping is aqualitative lean tool for eliminatingwaste
Creates a visual map of everyprocess involved in the flow ofmaterials and information in aproducts value chain
Work plan and
implementation
Future state
drawing
Current state
drawing
Product
family
Value Stream Mapping Steps
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Value Stream Mapping
Selected Set of Value Stream Mapping Icons
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Value StreamMapping
A Representative Current State Map for a Family of Retainers at a Bearings Manufacturing Company
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
House of Toyota
A key challenge is to bring underlying philosophy of lean to employees in an easy-to-understand fashion
The house conveys stability
The roof represents the primary goals of high quality, low cost, waste elimination, and short lead-times
The twin pillars, which supports the roof, represents JIT and Jidoka
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
House of Toyota
Highest quality, lowest cost, shortest lead time by eliminating wasted
time and activity
Just in Time (JIT)
Takt time
One-piece flow
Pull system
Culture of Continuous
Improvement
Jidoka
Manual or automatic line stop
Separate operator and machine activities
Error-proofing
Visual control
Operational Stability
Heijunka Standard Work TPM Supply Chain
-
OP
M 2
, 20
13
-15
, Term 3
Lea
n sy
stems
Need of change in fundamental beliefs about managing operationsCapability Capacity & Utilisation
Planning
Forecasting
Material Supply
Culture
MaterialManMachine
Man MachineMaterial
Monthly / MRP Run
Weekly Daily Hourly
Level Pull
Accuracy
Monthly Weekly Daily HourlyFlowPull
Closed Working in SilosPolicingInformation hoarding
Open Interconnected TeamsDisciplined ThoughtOpen Information sharing
Level ProductionKanban
LeadershipCommander
Crisis Management
CatalystCapability Building
CoachFacilitation
Capability Capacity & Utilisation
Planning
Forecasting
Material Supply
Culture
MaterialManMachine
Man MachineMaterial
Monthly / MRP Run
Weekly Daily Hourly
Level Pull
Accuracy
Monthly Weekly Daily HourlyFlowPull
Closed Working in SilosPolicingInformation hoarding
Open Interconnected TeamsDisciplined ThoughtOpen Information sharing
Level ProductionKanban
LeadershipCommander
Crisis Management
CatalystCapability Building
CoachFacilitation